Date post: | 22-Oct-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ehab-khiry |
View: | 13 times |
Download: | 2 times |
ACUTE
CNS
INFECTIONS
James E. Peacock, Jr. MD
“The precise and intelligent recognition and appreciation of minor differences is the real essential factor in all successful medical diagnosis…Eyes and ears which can see and hear, memory to record at once and to recall at pleasure the impressions of the senses, and an imagination capable of weaving a theory or piecing together a broken chain or unraveling a tangled clue, such are the implements of his trade to a successful diagnostician.”
Joseph Bell
CNS INFECTIONSOverview
Life-threatening problems with high associated mortality and morbidity
Presentation may be acute, subacute, or chronic Clinical findings determined by anatomic site(s) of
involvement, infecting pathogen, and host response Vulnerability of CNS to effects of inflammation &
edema mandates prompt diagnosis with appropriate therapy if consequences to be minimized
ACUTE CNS INFECTIONS
1. Bacterial meningitis***
2. Meningoencephalitis
3. Brain abscess
4. Subdural empyema
5. Epidural abscess
6. Septic venous sinus
thrombophlebitis
THE PATIENT WITH ACUTE CNS INFECTIONOverall Goals in Management
1. To promptly recognize the patient with an acute CNS infection syndrome
2. To rapidly initiate appropriate empiric therapy
3. To rapidly and specifically identify the etiologic agent, adjusting therapies as indicated
4. To optimize management of complicating features
Does the patient have a “CNS infection syndrome”?
Prodromal/concurrent URI sxs Fever, HA, altered MS Compatible PE findings
- Meningismus - Active RT infxn
- Exanthems - Focal neuro signs
Symptoms and the Likelihood of Meningitis
Symptoms– HA & fever– HA, N/V– HA, fever, N/V– HA, fever, N/V,
photophobia– HA, fever, N/V,
photophobia, stiff neck
Odds of Meningitis .42
.49
.56
.54
.57
Diagnostic Accuracy of Signs of Meningeal Irritation in Pts with Suspected
Meningitis
Sign Sens Spec PPV NPV +LR -LR
Nuchal 30% 68% 26% 73% 0.94 1.02
rigidity
Kernig’s 5% 95% 27% 72% 0.97 1.0
Brudzin- 5% 95% 27% 72% 0.97 1.0
ski’s
From:Thomas KE et al, CID 2002, 35:46-52
If the patient has a “CNS infection syndrome”, is it antimicrobial requiring?
Untreated/partially Rx’ed bacterial meningitis Parameningeal suppurative foci M. tuberculosis/Fungi Syphilis/Borrelia/Rickettsia HSV/CMV/VZV Others (amebae, parasites, etc)
APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH POSSIBLE CNS INFECTION
If the patient has a CNS infection syndrome, is it antimicrobial
or non-antimicrobial requiring?
Crucial and recurring question addressed sequentially over time
Points in Decision- Available Data BaseMaking Process For Decision-Making
Within the 1st 30 mins Clinical assessment of patient contact
After 1-2 hours CSF analysisAt 24-48 hours CSF cultures
Thereafter as clinically indicated
APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH SUSPECTED MENINGITIS
Decision-Making Within the First 30 Minutes
Clinical Assessment
Mode of presentation Acute (< 24 hrs)
Subacute (< 7 days) Chronic (> 4 wks) Historical/physical exam clues
Clinical status of the patient
Integrity of host defenses
CSF STUDIES
Color/Clarity Cell counts/WBC diff Chemistries (protein, glucose) Stains/Smears (Gram) Cultures (routine) +/- Antigen screens
APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITHSUSPECTED MENINGITIS
Decision-Making at 1-2 Hours
CSF Analysis
CSF smears/stainsCSF antigen screens
CSF “profile”
CSF SMEARS & STAINS
GmS + in 60-90% of pts with untreated bacterial meningitis
With prior ATB Rx, positivity of GmS decreases to 40-60%
REMEMBER: + GmS = Heavy organism burden & worse prognosis
CSF ANTIGEN SCREENS
Bacterial antigen screens detect S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, Hib, and GBS; + in 50-100% of pts (esp. useful in pts with prior ATB Rx)
Crypto antigen screen detects C. neoformans; + in 90-95% of pts with crypto meningitis
Should NOT be a ordered routinely
CEREBROSPINAL FLUID PROFILES*
Neutrophilic/Low glucose (purulent)
Lymphocytic/Normal glucose
Lymphocytic/Low glucose
*Profile designation based on WBC differential and glucose concentration. After NE Hyslop, Jr and MN Swartz, Postgrad Med 58:120, 1975.
BACTERIAL VS VIRAL MENINGITIS
Predictors of bacterial etiology: CSF glucose < 34 CSF: Serum glucose ratio < 0.23 CSF protein > 220 CSF WBC count > 2000 CSF neutrophil count > 1180
[Presence of any ONE of the above findings
predicts bacterial etiology with > 99% certainty]
APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH SUSPECTED MENINGITIS
Decision-Making at 24-48 hours
CSF Culture Results
Culture positive Adjust therapy based upon specific organism and sensitivities
Culture negative Evaluate for “aseptic” meningitis syndrome
TO LP OR NOT TO LP
Single most impt diagnostic test Mandatory, esp if bacterial
meningitis suspected If LP contraindicated, obtain BCs (+
in 50-60%), then begin empirical Rx
THE PATIENT WITH SUSPECTEDCNS INFECTION
Contraindications to LP
Absolute: Skin infection over site
Papilledema, focal neuro signs, ↓MS
Relative: Increased ICP without papilledema
Suspicion of mass lesion
Spinal cord tumor
Spinal epidural abscess
Bleeding diathesis or ↓ plts
CNS INFECTIONSCCT
Over-employed diagnostic modality Leads to unnecessary delays in Rx & added cost
Rarely indicated in pt with suspected acute meningitis
Mandatory in pt with possible focal infection Increased sensitivity with contrast
enhancement
CCT Before LP in Patients with Suspected Meningitis
301 pts with suspected meningitis; 235 (78%) had CCT prior to LP
CCT abnormal in 56/235 (24%); 11 pts (5%) had evidence of mass effect
Features associated with abnl CCT were age >60, immunocompromise, H/O CNS dz, H/O seizure w/in 7d, & selected neuro abnls
Hasbun, NEJM 2001;345:1727
CCT Before LP(Cont.)
Neuro abnls included altered MS, inability to answer 2 consecutive questions or follow 2 consecutive commands, gaze palsy, abnl visual fields, facial palsy, arm or leg drift, & abnl language
96/235 pts (41%) who underwent CCT had none of features present at baseline
CCT normal in 93 of these 96 pts (NPV 97%) Hasbun, NEJM 2001;345:1727
CNS INFECTIONSMRI
Not generally useful in acute diagnosis (Pt cooperation; logistics)
Very helpful in investigating potential complications developing later in clinical course such as venous sinus thrombosis or subdural empyema
THE PATIENT WITH SUSPECTED CNS INFECTIONRole of Repetitive LP’s
1. Rarely indicated in proven bacterial meningitis unless clinical response not optimal or as expected, fever recurs, or infection is due to ATB resistant pathogen
2. Essential in pts with “aseptic meningitis” syndromes to monitor course &/or response to empiric therapies
3. Essential in pts with subacute/chronic meningitis of proven etiology to assess response to Rx
4. Not routinely indicated at end-of-therapy for bacterial meningitis
BACTERIAL MENINGITIS
Incidence of 3 cases/100,000 population/yr (~25,000 total cases)
Fever, HA, meningismus, & altered mentation present in > 85% of pts
Other clinical findings– Cranial nerve palsies/focal signs 10-20%– Seizures 25-30%– Papilledema < 1%
BACTERIAL MENINGITISCaveats re: Antimicrobial Rx
Therapy is gen’ly IV, high dose, & bolus Dosing intervals should be appropriate for
drug being administered Utilize “cidal” therapy whenever possible Strive for CSF bactericidal index > 10 Initiate therapy promptly (ie, within 30 mins)
THE THERAPY OF MENINGITISDesirable Antimicrobic Properties
1. Activity vs suspected pathogen(s)
[preferably cidal]
2. Adequate CSF diffusion
3. Acceptable risk of toxicity
THE THERAPY OF MENINGITISCNS Penetration
Good Diffusion
Penicillins
3rd & 4th Gen Cephs
Chloramphenicol
Rifampin
TSX
Poor Diffusion
Early Gen Cephs
Clindamycin
AMGs
Tetracyclines
Macrolides
Bacterial MeningitisImportant Changes in Epidemiology
Marked decline in the occurrence of Hib ↑’ing incidence of S. pneumo (50+% of
cases in US) Shift from peds disease to adult disease ↑’ing incidence of ATB-resistant
organisms, esp. S. pneumo– PCN resistance ~ 35% (15-20% high level)– Ceph resistance 15-20% (5-10% high level)
COMMON BACTERIAL PATHOGENS BASED ON PREDISPOSING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH MENINGITIS
Predisposing FactorAge 0-4 wk
4-12 wk
3 mo to 18 yr 18-50 yr >50 yr
Common Bacterial Pathogens
Streptococcus agalactiae, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus spp., Salmonella
spp.S. agalactiae, E. coli, L. monocytogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidisH. influenzae, N. meningitidis, S. pneumoniaeS. pneumoniae, N. meningitidisS. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, L. monocytogenes, aerobic gram-negative bacilli
COMMON BACTERIAL PATHOGENS BASED ON PREDISPOSING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH MENINGITIS
Predisposing Factor
Immunocompromised state
Basilar skull fracture
Head trauma; postneurosurgery
Cerebrospinal fluid shunt
Common Bacterial Pathogens
S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, L.
monocytogenes, aerobic gram-negative bacilli (including P. aeruginosa)
S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, group A β-
hemolytic streptococci
Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus
epidermidis, aerobic gram-negative bacilli
(including P. aeruginosa)
S. epidermidis, S. aureus, aerobic gram- negative bacilli (including P. aeruginosa),
P. acnes
EMPIRIC THERAPY OF MENINGITIS IN THE ADULT
Clinical Setting Likely Pathogens Therapy
Community-acquired S. pneumoniae Ceftriaxone
N. meningitidis 2 gm q12h
[Listeria] +
[H. influenzae] Vancomycin 1-2 gm 12h
+/-
Ampicillin 2 gm q4h
Closed head trauma S. pneumoniae Pen G 3-4 mu q4h
Streptococci + Vancomycin 1-2 gm q12h
EMPIRIC THERAPY OF MENINGITIS IN THE ADULT
Clinical Setting Likely Pathogens Therapy
High risk patients S. aureus Vancomycin 2-3 gm/d Compromised hosts Gram negative + Neurosurgical bacilli Ceftazidime 2 gm q8h or Open head injury Listeria Cefepime 2 gm q8h Nosocomial [Ceftriaxone 2 gm q12h] Elderly [Cefotaxime 2 gm q4h] +/-
Ampicillin 2 gm q4h
SPECIFIC THERAPY FOR KNOWN PATHOGENS
Pathogen Recommended Therapy
S. pneumoniae* Pen G 18-24 mu/d
N. meningitidis or
Streptococci Ampicillin 12 gm/d
[Chloro 75-100 mg/kg/d]
[Ceftriaxone 2-4 gm/d]
H. influenzae Cefotaxime 12 gm/d
[Ceftriaxone 2-4 gm/d]
Group B strep Pen G 18-24 mu/d
or
Ampicillin 12 gm/d
[plus aminoglycoside]
SPECIFIC THERAPY FOR KNOWN PATHOGENS(continued)
S. aureus Nafcillin 12 gm/d
[Vancomycin 2-3 gm/d]
Listeria Ampicillin 12 gm/d
or
Pen G 18-24 mu/d
[plus aminoglycoside]
Gram negative Cefotaxime 12 gm/d
bacilli [Ceftriaxone 2-4 gm/d]
Pseudomonas Ceftazidime 6-8 gm/d or
Cefepime 6 gm/d
[plus aminoglycoside]
*Penicillin-susceptible (i.e. PCN MIC < 0.06). If penicillin resistant, see Table 7.
SUGGESTED TREATMENT REGIMENS FOR ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIAL MENINGITIS
Suggested Regimen
Bacteria Antibiotic Dosage
N. meningitidis Ceftriaxone 2g q12h
Penicillin MIC 0.1-1.0 µg/ml or
Cefotaxime 2g q4-6h
H. influenzae Ceftriaxone 2 g every 12h
-Lactamase producing or
Cefotaxime 2 g every 4-6h
S. pneumoniae Vancomycin 1-2 g every 12h
Highly resistant to +
penicillin (MIC > 1 g/ml) Ceftriaxone 2 gm every 12h
+/-
Rifampin 600 mg every 12-24h
Relatively resistant to Ceftriaxone 2-3 g every 12h
penicillin (MIC 0.1-1.0 g/ml) or or
Cefotaxime 2 g every 4h
or
Vancomycin 1-2g every 12h
Risk Factors for Drug-Resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP)
Extremes of age Recent ATB Rx Significant comorbid disease HIV infection or other immunodeficiency Day care or day care parent/sib Recent hospitalization Congregate settings (Institutions, military)
CORTICOSTEROIDS AND MENINGITIS
Role of steroids still somewhat uncertain Recent European study in adults suggested
that Rx with dexa associated with ↓ in risk of unfavorable outcome (25%→15%, RR 0.59) & in mortality (15%→7%, RR for death 0.48)
Benefit primarily ltd to pts w/S. pneumo Dose of dex was 10mg IV q6h X 4d; per
protocol, dex given concurrent with or 15-20 mins before 1st dose of ATBs
CORTICOSTEROIDS AND MENINGITIS(Cont)
Only pts with cloudy CSF, + CSF GmS, or CSF WBC count >1000 were enrolled
Accompanying editorial raised concerns about use of steroids in pts with DRSP who are being Rx’ed with vanc b/o ↓ in CNS conc of vanc with concurrent steroid use
Practically speaking, almost all pts with presumed bacterial meningitis are candidates for at least 1 dose of dexa NEJM 2002;347:1549
PREDICTORS OF ADVERSE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PTS WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED BACTERIAL
MENINGITIS
Retrospecitve study; 269 pts (84% culture +) Adverse clinical outcome in 36% of pts (Death 27%, neuro deficit
9%) ↓BP, altered MS, and seizures on presentation all independently
associated with adverse clinical outcome Adverse outcomes in 5% of low risk pts (0 features), 37% of
intermediate risk pts (1 feature), and 63% of high risk pts (2-3 features)
Delay in administration of appropriate ATB Rx also associated with adverse clinical outcome
Aronin et al, AIM1998;129:862
BACTERIAL MENINGITISDuration of ATB Rx
Pathogen Duration of Rx (d)
H. influenzae 7
N. meningitidis 7
S. pneumoniae 10-14
L. monocytogenes 14-21
Group B strep 14-21
GNRs 21 NEJM 1997;336:708
VIRAL MENINGITIS/ENCEPHALITIS
Enteroviruses
Polioviruses
Coxsackieviruses
Echoviruses
Togaviruses Eastern equine
Western equine
Venezuelan equine
St. Louis
Powasson
California
West Nile
Herpesviruses
Herpes simplex
Varicella-zoster
Epstein Barr
Cytomegalovirus
Myxo/paramyxoviruses Influenza/parainfluenzae
Mumps
Measles
Miscellaneous Adenoviruses
LCM
Rabies
HIV
NONVIRAL CAUSES OF ENCEPHALOMYELITIS
Rocky Mountain spotted fever Acanthamoeba
Typhus Toxoplasma
Mycoplasma Plasmodium falciparum
Brucellosis Trypanosomiasis
Subacute bacterial endocarditis Whipple’s disease
Syphilis (meningovascular) Behcet’s disease
Relapsing fever Vasculitis
Lyme disease
Leptospirosis
Tuberculosis
Cryptococcus
Histoplasma
Naegleria
BRAIN ABSCESS Infrequent but not uncommon; pathogenesis diverse with
contiguous spread & blood-borne seeding most common Clinical features include HA (90%), fever (57%), MS changes
(67%), hemiparesis (61%), & papilledema (56%) Dx often suggested by neuroimaging (CCT or MRI) LP is contraindicated due to risk of herniation Infxns often polymicrobial (strep, enteric GNRs, &/or
anaerobes); S. aureus may cause abscesses in association with IE
Other less common etiologies include Nocardia, fungi, M. tuberculosis, T. gondii, & neurocysticercosis
Drainage often a necessary component of management
BRAIN ABSCESSEmpiric Therapy
Penicillin G 18-24 mu IV qd
Metronidazole 500 mg IV q6h
Add nafcillin 12 gm/d if staph suspected
(use vanc if MRSA a concern) Add cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or ceftazidime if GNRs
suspected Substitute vanc 2-4 gm IV/d for pen G if DRSP
suspected