+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

Date post: 18-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: irc
View: 268 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
IRC’s Marieke Adank presented recent findings relating to monitoring and sustainability of rural WASH services in Ghana at the SWWW 2012.
13
Marieke Adank Stockholm Water Week 2012 MONITORING RURAL WATER SERVICE DELIVERY IN GHANA Marieke Adank Stockholm Water Week 2012
Transcript
Page 1: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

Marieke

Adank

Stockholm

Water Week

2012

MONITORING RURAL WATER

SERVICE DELIVERY IN GHANA

Marieke

Adank

Stockholm

Water Week

2012

Page 2: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …2

TRIPLE-S AND MONITORING IN

GHANA

• Developing and testing of indicators

• Assessing the current status of service

delivery

• Assessing the potential to improve data collection using mobile phone technology

2

Page 3: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …3

DATA COLLECTION

East Gonja, Northern Region

Akatsi, Volta Region

Sunyani West, Brong Ahafo Region

Page 4: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …4

INDICATORS

Water services: functionality, reliability, quantity (use),

quality, accessibility (distance and crowding)

Water service providers: day-to-day management

Service authority functions: planning, coordination,

oversight, monitoring, technical support

Developing indicators:

Set by government, with stakeholders

Based on national standards and guidelines

Score: 0 - 100

Benchmark: minimum acceptable score

Page 5: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …5

EXAMPLE OF WATER SERVICE PROVIDER SCORING:

COMPOSITION OF WATSAN COMMITTEE

Score Narrative description

0 The composition of the WATSAN committee is not in line with the CWSA guidelines

25 There is a WATSAN committee, which has been composed in line with the CWSA guidelines, but the WATSAN has not received initial training

50 Benchmark: There is a WATSAN committee. Its composition is in line with the CWSA guidelines and it has received initial training

75 There is a WATSAN committee. Its composition is in line with the CWSA guidelines and its members have received refresher training on an irregular basis

100 There is a WATSAN committee. Its composition is in line with the CWSA guidelines and its members have received refresher training on at least bi-annual basis

Page 6: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …6

SERVICE PROVIDER BENCHMARKING

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% o

f W

ATS

AN

s m

eeti

ng

the

ben

chm

k

Akatsi East Gonja Sunyani West

3 financial indicators 3 governance indicators 5 operational indicators

Page 7: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …7

CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MANAGEMENT AND POINT

SOURCE RELIABILITY

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% o

f re

liab

le p

oin

t so

urc

es

Point source managed by WATSAN that does not meetbenchmark

Page 8: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …8

68% 64%

32% 36%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Not managed byWATSAN

Managed byWATSAN

% o

f p

oin

t so

urc

es

not reliable

reliable

RELIABILITY AND SERVICE PROVIDERS

Page 9: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …9

SERVICE AUTHORITY INDICATORS

• Direct monitoring of technical, administrative and

financial performance of the community-based service

providers, and provision of technical assistance when

needed

• Presence of DWST

• Data flows from district to regional level

• District level budget allocation and utilisation

• Facility management plans and by-laws

• Coordination of NGOs

Direct support

Page 10: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …10

SERVICE AUTHORITY SCORES PER DISTRICT

WS-Sup1 /WB-Sup1 - Monitoring support Akatsi (n=109)

East Gonja (n=51)

Sunyani West (n=28)

Grand Total (n=288)

% of WATSANs for which the monitoring support benchmark is met 87% 28% 7% 59%

Support indicators Akatsi East Gonja Sunyani

West Average

Presence of District Water and Sanitation Team 0 25 25 17

Data flows from district to region level 25 25 0 17

Allocation and utilisation of district budget 50 25 0 25

Presence of facilitaty management plans and by-laws 25 0 0 8

NGO coordination 25 0 0 8

Page 11: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …11

SUPPORT AND MANAGEMENT

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

%o

f W

ATS

AN

s m

eet

ing

the

be

nch

mar

k o

n

serv

ice

pro

vid

er

ind

icat

ors

Percentage of WATSANsmeeting service providerbenchmark, withoutmonitoring support

Percentage of WATSANsmeeting service providerbenchmark, with monitoringsupport

Page 12: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …12

CONCLUSIONS

• Monitoring performance of service providers

(management) and service authority functions

(support) in addition to monitoring services provided

• Indicators should be context specific and based as

much as possible on national level norms and standards

• Findings from Ghana

– low levels of management and support

– correlations between performance of water service providers and

reliability

– correlations between the performance of direct support

(monitoring support) and the performance of the service

providers

Page 13: Adank monitoring rwsn ms wg_stockholm_aug 2012

WATER SERVICES THAT LAST …13

NEXT STEPS

• Discuss indicators and revise where needed

• Use findings as input for discussion on national level

norms and standards

• Scale up use of the indicators, through integration in

rural water supply monitoring system DiMES

• Link data collection process using mobile phone

technology (FLOW) to DiMES


Recommended