Date post: | 25-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | melvin-cooper |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Adult Social Care Service User Profile
April
ASC, Equality and the Research and Intelligence Team
Introduction
We are proud that Brent is one of the most diverse boroughs in the UK. To work effectively in such a diverse setting, we need a good understanding of all our communities.
The equality characteristics have an important influence on the changing identities and needs of local people. This is part of a series of profiles that provide an overview of the diversity of our service users and residents. They will be used to:
• ensure best quality services that are appropriate for our local communities
• identify any gaps in service use or outcomes
• demonstrate where our services are working effectively
• check who could be affected by changes to policies or services
• measure the effects of the council’s decisions on local people.
All 2011 Census data © ONS Crown Copyright Reserved unless otherwise statedMap data © Crown copyright and database rights 2012 Ordnance Survey 100025260
Wards in Brent
Queensbury
Fryent
Kenton
Northwick Park
Preston
Sudbury
Wembley Central
Barnhill
Welsh Harp
Dollis Hill
Tokyngton
Stonebridge
Harlesden
Dudden Hill
Kensal Green Queens Park
Brondesbury Park
Mapesbury
Kilburn
Alperton
Willesden
Data notes
These diversity profiles bring together information from the 2011 census and other data sources about the demographic, social and economic characteristics of the local population across the borough, including:
• age
• sex
• disability and bad health
• ethnicity
• religion or belief
Census data for Brent are benchmarked against London. All data are from the 2011 Census unless otherwise stated. Adult social care data are from Brent adult social care for September 2014. The profile will be reviewed every two years. There may be differences between 2011 census data and data more recently collected by service areas.
• Data of users from adult social care sources are for those aged 18 and over and are compared to data from the 2011 census for those aged 16 and over.
• Data referred to as “with a limiting condition” or “disabled” are for those that responded their day-to-day activities are limited a little or a lot to the 2011 Census question “Are your day-to-day activities limited because of a health problem or disability which has lasted, or is expected to last at least 12 months?”
All data used in this profile can be found here.
Percentage change in population with limiting conditions from 2001 to 2011 by ward
-2.1% – 0%
0% – 10%
10% – 20%
20% – 25%
Executive summary
24%
of people who cannot speak English well or at all are women in bad health
2014 2019
The population aged 85 and over will increase by 30% over the next five years
=250
Female life expectancy of babies born between 2010 and 2012
Adult social care users with physical disability
41.5%
93.3%
18 to 64 65 and over
85Life expectancy
Healthy life expectancy 63
Aging population
Language and health
Life expectancy and healthy life expectancy
Source: Public Health Outcomes Framework 2010-2012
79.9
84.5
63.2
62.9
79.7
79.2
83.8
83.0
63.2
63.4
63.6
64.1
16.7
Healthy life expectancy Life expectancy21.6
Men
Women
London
England
London
England
Brent
Brent
Disability
1 in 7 (14.4%) people say their day-to-day activities are limited
Brent14.4%
Queens Park11.4%
Stonebridge16.5%
Disability and economic inequality
People with activities limited
Median Household Income
Source:Median Household Income CACI 2014
16.5%
11.4% £22,188
Stonebridge
Queens ParkStonebridge
Queens Park
£41,423
-21.5 -16.5 -11.5 -6.5 -1.5 3.5 8.5 13.5 18.5
-£50,000 -£40,000 -£30,000 -£20,000 -£10,000 £0 £10,000 £20,000 £30,000 £40,000
16.5%
15.1%
13.6%
15.1%
15.1%
15.4%
14.9%
14.1%
13.4%
14.7%
14.9%
14.0%
13.8%
15.1%
14.3%
14.7%
12.8%
15.1%
13.1%
15.8%
11.4%
£22,188
£23,977
£26,312
£27,644
£29,697
£29,847
£30,026
£30,389
£30,796
£30,895
£31,288
£32,262
£32,740
£32,745
£33,620
£35,853
£36,665
£39,296
£40,062
£41,354
£41,423
Stonebridge
Harlesden
Alperton
Wembley Central
Dollis Hill
Welsh Harp
Tokyngton
Sudbury
Willesden Green
Kilburn
Queensbury
Kensal Green
Dudden Hill
Barnhill
Fryent
Preston
Mapesbury
Brondesbury Park
Northwick Park
Kenton
Queens Park
Disability and economic inequality
People with activities limited Median Household Income
Lowest
Lowest
Highest
Highest
Source: Median Household Income CACI 2014
Change in disability from 2001 to 2011
-2.1% – 0%
0% – 10%
10% – 20%
20% – 25%
Brent
Queens Park
Harlesden 25.5%
-2.1%
9.2%
Economic activity by disability
Brent
London
England and Wales
73%
74%
77%
4%
4%
3%
23%
22%
20%
Economically inactive Unemployed In employment
18 to 64
65 and over
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Physcial disability Mental health Learning disability Substance misuse and other
Adult social care users: Percentage of disability by age group
Disability by age
Physical disability
Disability by sex Adult Social Care users and Disability Living Allowance (DLA) Claimants
40.0%
8.2%
50.9%
43.7%
21.0%
34.4%
30.4%
16.0%
49.7%
24.3%
10.1%
63.7%
ASC Users
mental health
learning disability
physical disability
WomenMen
DLA Claimants
Source: Disability living allowance claimants May 2014 (NOMIS)
Activities limited by age group
16 to 49
50 to 64
65 to 74
=1000
Activities limited a lot
Activities limited
75 to 84
85 and over
WomenMen
39%
2%22%
23%
15%
33%
5%
34%
20%
8%
Disability and ethnicity 18 to 64
Adult social care service users
Population with a limiting condition
White Mixed Asian Black Other
46%
2%
31%
18%
2%
31%
10%
28%
29%
2%
Disability and ethnicity 65 and over
Adult social care service users
Population with a limiting condition
White Mixed Asian Black Other
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over
Limiting condition and ethnicity by age group and sex
Male Female
White Mixed Asian Black Other Average
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over
Limiting condition and ethnicity by age group and sex – white residents
Male Female
White Mixed Asian Black Other Average
30%25%
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over
Limiting condition and ethnicity by age group and sex – Asian residents
Male Female
36%
29%
White Mixed Asian Black Other Average
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
16 to 49 50 to 64 65 and over
Limiting condition and ethnicity by age group and sex – black residents
Male Female
21%
White Mixed Asian Black Other Average
27%
Disability and religion
Buddhist SikhJewish No religionHindu Other religionChristian Religion not statedMuslim
40.9%
54.0%
16.6%
8.2%
19.1%
16.7%
39.4%
52.3%
22.5%
9.4%
17.7%
18.6%
16 to 64
65 and over
With a limiting
condition
Brent
4.7%
3.3%
10.8%
5.0%
3.4%
2.9%
Bad health and proficiency in English
Cannot speak English well or at all
All people
People in good health
People with bad healthMen
Women
Aged 85+
Changing 65 and over population
2009
2014
2024
2019
=1,000Men aged 65 and over Women aged 65 and over
Source: GLA SHLAA based population projections 2013 rnd
Ethnicity aged 65 and over
Crown copyright and database rights 2014 Ordnance Survey 100025260
65 and over
White BlackAsian OtherMixed
British
Irish
Gypsy or Irish Traveller
Other White
Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Chinese
Other Asian
African
Caribbean
Other Black
White and Black Caribbean
White and Black African
White and Asian
Other Mixed
Arab
Any other ethnic group
Ethnicity aged 85 and over
Crown copyright and database rights 2014 Ordnance Survey 100025260
85 and over
White BlackAsian OtherMixed
British
Irish
Gypsy or Irish Traveller
Other White
Indian
Pakistani
Bangladeshi
Chinese
Other Asian
African
Caribbean
Other Black
White and Black Caribbean
White and Black African
White and Asian
Other Mixed
Arab
Any other ethnic group
Change in ethnicity in white residents aged 65 and over, 2009 to 2024
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
2009 2014 2019 2024
WhiteBlackAsian
0%
Source: GLA SHLAA based population projections 2013 rnd
Other
Change in ethnicity in black residents aged 65 and over, 2009 to 2024
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
2009 2014 2019 2024
WhiteBlackAsian
28%
Source: GLA SHLAA based population projections 2013 rnd
Other
Change in ethnicity in Asian residents aged 65 and over, 2009 to 2024
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
2009 2014 2019 2024
WhiteBlackAsian
66%
Source: GLA SHLAA based population projections 2013 rnd
Other
Mental health – wellbeing in London
Brent
Excerpted from London: The Information Capital by James Cheshire and Oliver Uberti (Particular Books, 30 October 2014)
Mental health – depression and anxiety
Brent England
64.70
53.40
10.85 11.95Depression and anxiety prevalence
Depression and anxiety prevalence among social care users
Source: Public Health Profiles: community mental health 2012/13 and common mental health disorders 2012/13
Mental health – dementia prevalence by GP practice postcode
Proportion of patients aged 65 and over
Dementia prevalence (all ages)
29%
4%
11%
More than 1%
0.75 to 1%
0.5 to 0.75%
0.25 to 0.5%
Under 0.25%
Source: Public Health Profiles: national general practice profiles, 2012/13
Age and sex of adult social care users
=200
18 to 64
65 and over
WomenMen
Key outcome – direct payments age
Adult Social Care users Receive direct payments
=200
18 to 64
65 and over
65 to 74 75 to 84 85 and over
Key outcome – direct payments ethnicity, aged 18 and over
Receive services from CASSR Receive direct payments
WhiteBlackAsian Other
Indian378
Pakistani160
Other Asian378
African249
Caribbean839
Other black379
British1,398
Irish373
Other white496
301 128 398 152
631 188 223
Mixed
64
Key outcome – direct payments disability, aged 18 to 64
Physical disability
Mental health
Learning disability
Substance misuse and other
665
249
675
14
Adult Social Care users Receive direct payments
21%
8%
48%
58%
Equality analysis guidance
When officers are performing equality analysis, they could use the information in these diversity profiles to help answer the following questions:
What differences are there between the diversity profile of your customers and the local area? Are people with some equality characteristics under or over represented?
Who is likely to be affected by any changes to your policies, strategies and services?
How can you ensure that consultation exercises reach all relevant stakeholders and communities including potential service users?
Would projects and services that worked well elsewhere need to be tailored for our diverse local communities?
Remember to think about the needs of all local people, including smaller groups such as the lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender, LGBT, community, Gypsies and Travellers, Eastern European and white working class people.
These profiles are only a starting point to understanding the nuances of Brent and its rich diversity. We encourage officers to draw on additional information from the borough profile and Brent data and to engage with communities to build a fuller picture of the needs and concerns of all our residents.
If officers have any further questions, please contact the Equality Team on [email protected].
Further data.
For more information on the topics covered in this diversity profile, please use the following links:
Number of men and women at each age in 2001 and 2011
Number of people per hectare and per household in 2011
Number of people by main religion in 2001 and 2011 for Brent and regions
Number of people by main religion in 2001 and 2011 for wards in Brent
Number of people by healthiness in 2001 and 2011 for Brent and regions
Number of people by healthiness in 2001 and 2011 for wards in Brent
Number of people by selected ethnic group in 2001 and 2011 for Brent and regions
Number of people by selected ethnic group in 2001 and 2011 for Brent and regions
Number of people by their ability in English in 2011 for Brent
Number of people by their ability in English in 2011 for the wards in Brent