AER Combined Report

Annual Education Report 08/20/2012

District-Level Combined Reports Data for Wayne RESA, Edison Public School Academy

Student Assessment Data - Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP)

Subject Grade Student Group School Year % StudentsTested

State % StudentsProficient

District %StudentsProficient

% Advanced(Level 1)

% Proficient(Level 2)

% PartiallyProficient (Level3)

% Not Proficient(Level 4)

English LanguageArts / Reading

03 All Students 2010-11 100% 63.2% 60.4% 7.2% 53.2% 24.3% 15.3%


03 All Students 2011-12 100% 62.4% 56.5% 5.2% 51.3% 31.3% 12.2%


03 Black or AfricanAmerican

2010-11 100% 40.6% 60.4% 7.2% 53.2% 24.3% 15.3%



2011-12 100% 38.4% 55.8% 4.4% 51.3% 31.9% 12.4%


03 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 63% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


03 Female 2010-11 100% 66.8% 65.4% 11.5% 53.8% 25% 9.6%


03 Female 2011-12 100% 65.9% 66.1% 10.2% 55.9% 25.4% 8.5%


03 Male 2010-11 100% 59.6% 55.9% 3.4% 52.5% 23.7% 20.3%


03 Male 2011-12 100% 59% 46.4% 0% 46.4% 37.5% 16.1%


03 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11 100% 50.3% 55.7% 7.1% 48.6% 27.1% 17.1%



2011-12 100% 49.5% 51.6% 8.1% 43.5% 35.5% 12.9%


03 Students withDisabilities

2010-11 <10 32.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 34.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


04 All Students 2010-11 100% 63.5% 58.7% 4.1% 54.5% 34.7% 6.6%


04 All Students 2011-12 100% 67.7% 65.8% 3.5% 62.3% 27.2% 7%



2010-11 100% 40.8% 58.7% 4.1% 54.5% 34.7% 6.6%



2011-12 100% 45.1% 65.8% 3.5% 62.3% 27.2% 7%


04 Female 2010-11 100% 67.4% 65.5% 7.3% 58.2% 29.1% 5.5%


04 Female 2011-12 100% 71.7% 70.9% 7.3% 63.6% 25.5% 3.6%


04 Male 2010-11 100% 59.7% 53% 1.5% 51.5% 39.4% 7.6%

Page 1 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)





04 Male 2011-12 100% 63.7% 61% 0% 61% 28.8% 10.2%



2010-11 100% 50% 52.5% 2.5% 50% 37.5% 10%



2011-12 100% 55% 57.1% 2.9% 54.3% 32.9% 10%



2010-11 <10 29.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


05 All Students 2010-11 100% 65.3% 68% 12.8% 55.2% 21.6% 10.4%


05 All Students 2011-12 100% 68.8% 73.1% 16% 57.1% 17.6% 9.2%



2010-11 100% 45.4% 68.5% 12.9% 55.6% 21.8% 9.7%



2011-12 100% 48.3% 72.9% 15.3% 57.6% 17.8% 9.3%


05 Two or MoreRaces

2010-11 <10 64.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


05 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 68.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


05 Female 2010-11 100% 68.4% 78.1% 18.8% 59.4% 17.2% 4.7%


05 Female 2011-12 100% 71.7% 78% 18.6% 59.3% 13.6% 8.5%


05 Male 2010-11 100% 62.2% 57.4% 6.6% 50.8% 26.2% 16.4%


05 Male 2011-12 100% 65.9% 68.3% 13.3% 55% 21.7% 10%



2010-11 100% 51.9% 65.8% 11.4% 54.4% 26.6% 7.6%



2011-12 100% 56.1% 68.6% 15.7% 52.9% 18.6% 12.9%



2010-11 <10 28% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 34.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 All Students 2010-11 100% 63.2% 53.8% 13.7% 40.2% 28.2% 17.9%


06 All Students 2011-12 100% 67% 70.6% 10.8% 59.8% 19.6% 9.8%

Page 2 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)






2010-11 100% 39.2% 53.8% 13.7% 40.2% 28.2% 17.9%



2011-12 100% 43.8% 70.3% 9.9% 60.4% 19.8% 9.9%


06 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 65.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


06 Female 2010-11 100% 66.8% 53.8% 12.3% 41.5% 30.8% 15.4%


06 Female 2011-12 100% 70.2% 76.9% 17.3% 59.6% 13.5% 9.6%


06 Male 2010-11 100% 59.7% 53.8% 15.4% 38.5% 25% 21.2%


06 Male 2011-12 100% 63.8% 64% 4% 60% 26% 10%



2010-11 100% 48.9% 49.3% 11% 38.4% 31.5% 19.2%



2011-12 100% 53.6% 72.3% 7.7% 64.6% 18.5% 9.2%



2010-11 <10 23.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 28.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


07 All Students 2010-11 100% 55.6% 57.6% 9.3% 48.3% 26.3% 16.1%


07 All Students 2011-12 100% 59.7% 60.2% 11.9% 48.3% 23.7% 16.1%



2010-11 100% 30.2% 57.6% 9.3% 48.3% 26.3% 16.1%



2011-12 100% 34.7% 59.8% 12% 47.9% 23.9% 16.2%


07 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 58.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


07 Female 2010-11 100% 60.3% 51.7% 10.3% 41.4% 27.6% 20.7%


07 Female 2011-12 100% 63.9% 61.7% 13.3% 48.3% 23.3% 15%


07 Male 2010-11 100% 51.1% 63.3% 8.3% 55% 25% 11.7%


07 Male 2011-12 100% 55.6% 58.6% 10.3% 48.3% 24.1% 17.2%

Page 3 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)






2010-11 100% 40.1% 53.9% 7.9% 46.1% 22.4% 23.7%



2011-12 100% 44.5% 53.7% 10.4% 43.3% 23.9% 22.4%



2010-11 <10 14.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 19% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


08 All Students 2010-11 100% 56% 54.4% 8.7% 45.6% 35% 10.7%


08 All Students 2011-12 100% 60.5% 72.6% 15.1% 57.5% 25.5% 1.9%



2010-11 100% 35% 54.4% 8.7% 45.6% 35% 10.7%



2011-12 100% 39.4% 72.4% 14.3% 58.1% 25.7% 1.9%


08 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 59.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


08 Female 2010-11 100% 60.9% 52.6% 10.5% 42.1% 38.6% 8.8%


08 Female 2011-12 100% 65.3% 69.8% 15.1% 54.7% 30.2% 0%


08 Male 2010-11 100% 51.2% 56.5% 6.5% 50% 30.4% 13%


08 Male 2011-12 100% 55.9% 75.5% 15.1% 60.4% 20.8% 3.8%



2010-11 100% 41.4% 55.6% 6.3% 49.2% 30.2% 14.3%



2011-12 100% 46.7% 72.4% 12.1% 60.3% 24.1% 3.4%



2010-11 <10 16.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 20.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 03 All Students 2010-11 100% 34.8% 38.7% 0.9% 37.8% 28.8% 32.4%

Mathematics 03 All Students 2011-12 100% 36.3% 35.4% 4.4% 31% 26.5% 38.1%

Mathematics 03 Black or AfricanAmerican

2010-11 100% 14.6% 38.7% 0.9% 37.8% 28.8% 32.4%


2011-12 100% 14.5% 35.1% 4.5% 30.6% 26.1% 38.7%

Page 4 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)




Mathematics 03 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 34.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 03 Female 2010-11 100% 33.4% 46.2% 0% 46.2% 25% 28.8%

Mathematics 03 Female 2011-12 100% 34.9% 43.9% 1.8% 42.1% 24.6% 31.6%

Mathematics 03 Male 2010-11 100% 36.3% 32.2% 1.7% 30.5% 32.2% 35.6%


Mathematics 03 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11 100% 21.6% 32.9% 1.4% 31.4% 35.7% 31.4%


2011-12 100% 23% 33.9% 3.2% 30.6% 24.2% 41.9%

Mathematics 03 Students withDisabilities

2010-11 <10 17.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 18.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 04 All Students 2010-11 99.2% 39.6% 31.7% 1.7% 30% 16.7% 51.7%

Mathematics 04 All Students 2011-12 100% 39.9% 43.9% 0.9% 43% 20.2% 36%


2010-11 99.2% 17.3% 31.7% 1.7% 30% 16.7% 51.7%


2011-12 100% 15.9% 43.9% 0.9% 43% 20.2% 36%

Mathematics 04 Female 2010-11 98.2% 37.8% 35.2% 1.9% 33.3% 18.5% 46.3%

Mathematics 04 Female 2011-12 100% 38.5% 49.1% 1.8% 47.3% 10.9% 40%


Mathematics 04 Male 2011-12 100% 41.2% 39% 0% 39% 28.8% 32.2%


2010-11 98.8% 25.3% 27.8% 0% 27.8% 17.7% 54.4%


2011-12 100% 25.3% 35.7% 1.4% 34.3% 20% 44.3%


2010-11 <10 18.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 05 All Students 2010-11 98.4% 38.5% 32.5% 1.6% 30.9% 33.3% 34.1%



2010-11 99.2% 17.5% 32.5% 1.6% 30.9% 33.3% 34.1%


2011-12 100% 17% 39.8% 2.5% 37.3% 25.4% 34.7%


2011-12 <10 37.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 5 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)




Mathematics 05 Female 2010-11 98.4% 36.3% 31.7% 1.6% 30.2% 33.3% 34.9%

Mathematics 05 Female 2011-12 100% 37.5% 42.4% 1.7% 40.7% 23.7% 33.9%

Mathematics 05 Male 2010-11 98.4% 40.6% 33.3% 1.7% 31.7% 33.3% 33.3%

Mathematics 05 Male 2011-12 100% 41.6% 38.3% 3.3% 35% 26.7% 35%


2010-11 98.7% 24.1% 29.5% 0% 29.5% 32.1% 38.5%


2011-12 100% 24.9% 30% 1.4% 28.6% 28.6% 41.4%


2010-11 <10 14.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 16% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 All Students 2010-11 99.1% 36.2% 37.9% 0.9% 37.1% 22.4% 39.7%



2010-11 99.1% 15.5% 37.9% 0.9% 37.1% 22.4% 39.7%


2011-12 100% 15.4% 37.6% 3% 34.7% 34.7% 27.7%


2011-12 <10 33.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 Female 2010-11 98.5% 36.1% 35.9% 1.6% 34.4% 25% 39.1%

Mathematics 06 Female 2011-12 100% 36.8% 50% 1.9% 48.1% 23.1% 26.9%

Mathematics 06 Male 2010-11 100% 36.3% 40.4% 0% 40.4% 19.2% 40.4%

Mathematics 06 Male 2011-12 100% 37.4% 26% 4% 22% 46% 28%


2010-11 98.6% 22% 31.9% 1.4% 30.6% 23.6% 44.4%


2011-12 100% 22.5% 33.8% 3.1% 30.8% 35.4% 30.8%


2010-11 <10 10% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 11% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 07 All Students 2010-11 98.3% 35.9% 33.6% 0% 33.6% 39.7% 26.7%



2010-11 98.3% 13.2% 33.6% 0% 33.6% 39.7% 26.7%


2011-12 100% 13.4% 25.9% 0.9% 25% 37.1% 37.1%

Page 6 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)





2011-12 <10 34.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 07 Female 2010-11 98.3% 36% 22.8% 0% 22.8% 47.4% 29.8%

Mathematics 07 Female 2011-12 100% 38% 27.1% 0% 27.1% 42.4% 30.5%

Mathematics 07 Male 2010-11 98.3% 35.8% 44.1% 0% 44.1% 32.2% 23.7%

Mathematics 07 Male 2011-12 100% 36.5% 25.9% 1.7% 24.1% 31% 43.1%


2010-11 98.7% 20.8% 26.7% 0% 26.7% 40% 33.3%


2011-12 100% 21.6% 22.4% 0% 22.4% 37.3% 40.3%


2010-11 <10 7.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 8.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 All Students 2010-11 100% 28.9% 9.7% 0% 9.7% 38.8% 51.5%

Mathematics 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 29.4% 27.6% 0% 27.6% 41% 31.4%


2010-11 100% 9.1% 9.7% 0% 9.7% 38.8% 51.5%


2011-12 100% 9.1% 26.9% 0% 26.9% 41.3% 31.7%


2011-12 <10 26.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 Female 2010-11 100% 27.4% 12.3% 0% 12.3% 36.8% 50.9%

Mathematics 08 Female 2011-12 100% 28% 25% 0% 25% 44.2% 30.8%




2010-11 100% 14.6% 7.9% 0% 7.9% 39.7% 52.4%


2011-12 100% 15.3% 19.3% 0% 19.3% 45.6% 35.1%


2010-11 <10 5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 05 All Students 2010-11 98.4% 17.4% 6.5% 1.6% 4.9% 25.2% 68.3%

Science 05 All Students 2011-12 100% 15.3% 13.4% 7.6% 5.9% 33.6% 52.9%

Science 05 Black or AfricanAmerican

2010-11 99.2% 4.1% 6.5% 1.6% 4.9% 25.2% 68.3%


2011-12 100% 3.2% 12.7% 6.8% 5.9% 33.9% 53.4%

Page 7 of 29







% Advanced(Level 1)




Science 05 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 14.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 05 Female 2010-11 98.4% 15.5% 9.5% 3.2% 6.3% 27% 63.5%

Science 05 Female 2011-12 100% 13.6% 6.8% 5.1% 1.7% 39% 54.2%

Science 05 Male 2010-11 98.4% 19.1% 3.3% 0% 3.3% 23.3% 73.3%

Science 05 Male 2011-12 100% 17% 20% 10% 10% 28.3% 51.7%

Science 05 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2010-11 98.7% 8.3% 3.8% 0% 3.8% 23.1% 73.1%


2011-12 100% 7% 10% 5.7% 4.3% 31.4% 58.6%

Science 05 Students withDisabilities

2010-11 <10 5.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 5.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 All Students 2010-11 99% 14.9% 3.9% 1% 2.9% 24.5% 71.6%

Science 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 16.5% 19.6% 3.7% 15.9% 33.6% 46.7%


2010-11 99% 3.2% 3.9% 1% 2.9% 24.5% 71.6%


2011-12 100% 3.3% 19.8% 3.8% 16% 33% 47.2%

Science 08 Two or MoreRaces

2011-12 <10 14.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Female 2010-11 98.2% 12% 3.6% 1.8% 1.8% 19.6% 76.8%

Science 08 Female 2011-12 100% 13.8% 13% 3.7% 9.3% 33.3% 53.7%

Science 08 Male 2010-11 100% 17.7% 4.3% 0% 4.3% 30.4% 65.2%

Science 08 Male 2011-12 100% 19% 26.4% 3.8% 22.6% 34% 39.6%


2010-11 98.4% 6.9% 3.2% 0% 3.2% 27.4% 69.4%


2011-12 100% 7.7% 13.6% 1.7% 11.9% 35.6% 50.8%


2010-11 <10 3.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 3.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 8 of 29



Student Assessment Data - Michigan Merit Examination (MME)




% Advanced(Level 1)




Page 9 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Functional Independence

Subject Grade Student Group School Year % Students Tested State % StudentsProficient


% Surpassed(Level 1)

% Attained (Level2)

% Emerging(Level 3)

Mathematics 03 All Students 2010-11 <10 74.7% <10 <10 <10 <10


2010-11 <10 65.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 03 Female 2010-11 <10 73.5% <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 77.5% <10 <10 <10 <10





2010-11 <10 64.5% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 61.2% <10 <10 <10 <10


Mathematics 05 Male 2011-12 <10 72.2% <10 <10 <10 <10




2010-11 <10 74.7% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 67.2% <10 <10 <10 <10



Mathematics 07 All Students 2010-11 <10 71% <10 <10 <10 <10



2010-11 <10 61.6% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 61.7% <10 <10 <10 <10




Mathematics 08 All Students 2010-11 <10 79% <10 <10 <10 <10



2010-11 <10 72.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 10 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Functional Independence




% Attained (Level2)

% Emerging(Level 3)


2011-12 <10 71.2% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 Female 2010-11 <10 76% <10 <10 <10 <10



Science 05 All Students 2010-11 <10 56.8% <10 <10 <10 <10



2010-11 <10 47.1% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 36.9% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 05 Female 2010-11 <10 51.6% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 05 Male 2011-12 <10 47.6% <10 <10 <10 <10




2010-11 <10 32.2% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 38.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Female 2010-11 <10 39.8% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Female 2011-12 <10 46.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Science 08 Male 2011-12 <10 53.1% <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 11 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Supported Independence




% Attained (Level2)

% Emerging(Level 3)

Page 12 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MI-Access : Participation




% Attained (Level2)

% Emerging(Level 3)

English LanguageArts

03 All Students 2010-11 <10 61.4% <10 <10 <10 <10



2010-11 <10 65.2% <10 <10 <10 <10


03 Male 2010-11 <10 60.3% <10 <10 <10 <10


04 All Students 2011-12 <10 59.9% <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 55.1% <10 <10 <10 <10


04 Male 2011-12 <10 62.3% <10 <10 <10 <10



2010-11 <10 68.5% <10 <10 <10 <10




2011-12 <10 64.8% <10 <10 <10 <10


Page 13 of 29



Student Assessment Data - MEAP-Access



% Level 1 % Level 2 % Level 3

Reading 04 All Students 2011-12 100% 45.8% 0% 0% 0% 100%

Reading 04 Black or AfricanAmerican

2011-12 <10 39.7% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 04 Male 2011-12 <10 47.6% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 04 EconomicallyDisadvantaged

2011-12 <10 44.5% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 06 All Students 2011-12 100% 59% 100% 0% 100% 0%


2011-12 <10 51.3% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 06 Male 2011-12 <10 58.6% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 59.3% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 60.7% 100% 100% 0% 0%


2011-12 <10 53.2% <10 <10 <10 <10

Reading 08 Female 2011-12 <10 63.8% <10 <10 <10 <10


2011-12 <10 60.5% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 04 All Students 2011-12 100% 55.1% 100% 0% 100% 0%


2011-12 <10 49% <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 54.6% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 06 All Students 2011-12 100% 59.6% 0% 0% 0% 100%


2011-12 <10 53.1% <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 60.5% <10 <10 <10 <10

Mathematics 08 All Students 2011-12 100% 43% 100% 0% 100% 0%


2011-12 <10 37.8% <10 <10 <10 <10



2011-12 <10 42.3% <10 <10 <10 <10

Page 14 of 29



AYP Detail Data

Student Group Location Subject % Tested (Goal 95%) % Proficient for AYP*

All Students State English Language Arts /Reading

98.8% 82.9%

All Students State Mathematics 98.5% 57.5%

All Students District English Language Arts /Reading

99.9% 85.7%

All Students District Mathematics 99.9% 63.9%

American Indian or AlaskaNative

State English Language Arts /Reading

97.7% 78.6%

American Indian or AlaskaNative

State Mathematics 97.5% 47.4%

Asian, Native Hawaiian, orPacific Islander


100.6% 89.8%




District English Language Arts /Reading

N/A N/A


District Mathematics N/A N/A

Black or African American State English Language Arts /Reading

96.9% 67.4%

Black or African American State Mathematics 96.4% 32.2%

Black or African American District English Language Arts /Reading

99.9% 85.8%

Black or African American District Mathematics 99.9% 63.8%

Hispanic or Latino State English Language Arts /Reading

99% 75.8%

Hispanic or Latino State Mathematics 98.5% 44.6%

Two or More Races State English Language Arts /Reading

99.1% 83.6%

Two or More Races State Mathematics 99% 54.9%

Two or More Races District English Language Arts /Reading

<30 <30

Two or More Races District Mathematics <30 <30

White State English Language Arts /Reading

99.2% 86.9%

White State Mathematics 99% 63.9%

EconomicallyDisadvantaged


98.3% 74.4%




District English Language Arts /Reading

100% 83.6%


District Mathematics 100% 57.9%

Students with Disabilities State English Language Arts /Reading

97.7% 51.5%

Students with Disabilities State Mathematics 97.3% 32%

Students with Disabilities District English Language Arts /Reading

<30 <30

Students with Disabilities District Mathematics <30 <30Note: 1037 Recently arrived LEP students took part in the State’s ELPA instead of the MEAP/MME/MI-Access.

Page 15 of 29



AYP Detail Data - Graduation Rate

Student Group Location Graduation Rate (High Schools only) (Goal80%)

All Students State 79.2%

American Indian or Alaska Native State 68.49%

Asian State 90.49%

Black or African American State 62.56%

Hispanic or Latino State 68.31%

Migrant State 73.33%

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander State 71.79%

Two or More Races State 73.44%

White State 84.81%

Female State 83.17%

Male State 75.45%

Economically Disadvantaged State 67.16%

Students with Disabilities State 64.79%

* All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year.

Page 16 of 29



AYP Detail Data - Attendance Rate

Student Group Location Attendance Rate (Goal 90%)

All Students State 94.8%

All Students District 99.7%

American Indian or Alaska Native State 94.1%

American Indian or Alaska Native District 100%

Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander State 96.4%

Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander District 100%

Black or African American State 91%

Black or African American District 99.7%

Hispanic or Latino State 94.3%

Two or More Races State 95%

White State 95.8%

White District 100%

Economically Disadvantaged State 94.8%

Economically Disadvantaged District 99.7%

Students with Disabilities State 93.2%

Students with Disabilities District 99.5%

* All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year.

Page 17 of 29



Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Reading/ELA

School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11

2001-02 38% 31% 42%

2002-03 38% 31% 42%

2003-04 38% 31% 42%

2004-05 48% 43% 52%

2005-06 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52%

2006-07 50% 48% 46% 45% 43% 41% 52%

2007-08 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61%

2008-09 60% 59% 57% 56% 54% 53% 61%

2009-10 70% 69% 68% 67% 66% 65% 71%

2010-11 78% 77% 76% 75% 74% 73% 79%

2011-12 86% 85% 84% 83% 82% 82% 86%

2012-13 93% 92% 92% 91% 91% 91% 93%

2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Page 18 of 29



Michigan Annual AYP Objectives for Mathematics

School Year Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11

2001-02 47% 31% 33%

2002-03 47% 31% 33%

2003-04 47% 31% 33%

2004-05 56% 43% 44%

2005-06 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44%

2006-07 59% 56% 53% 50% 46% 43% 44%

2007-08 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2008-09 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2009-10 67% 65% 62% 60% 57% 54% 55%

2010-11 75% 74% 71% 70% 67% 66% 67%

2011-12 83% 82% 81% 80% 78% 77% 78%

2012-13 91% 91% 90% 90% 89% 89% 89%

2013-14 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Page 19 of 29



District AYP Status

AYP ELA/Reading Status AYP Mathematics Status AYP Overall Status

Met Met Met

Page 20 of 29



Schools in District AYP Status

School/ Building Title 1 Status AYP ELA/Reading Status AYP Mathematics Status AYP Overall Status Education Yes Report CardGrade

School Status Indicator

Edison Public SchoolAcademy

Yes Met Met Met C

% of Schools making AYP: 100%% of Schools in School Improvement status: 0%% of Schools in Corrective Action status: 0%% of Schools in Restructuring status: 0%% of Title I Schools making AYP: 100%% of Title I Schools in School Improvement status: 0%% of Title I Schools in Corrective Action status: 0%% of Title I Schools in Restructuring status: 0%

Page 21 of 29



Teacher Quality Data

Other B.A. M.A. Ph.D

Professional Qualificationsof All Public Elementary andSecondary School Teachersin the District

0 50 7 0

Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers

Page 22 of 29




Certification Percent

Percentage of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in theDistrict with Emergency Certification

14%

Page 23 of 29




District Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools

Percentage of Core AcademicSubject Elementary and SecondarySchool Classes not Taught byHighly Qualified Teachers

Page 24 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Mathematics Results

Percent of Students Percent below Basic Percent Basic Percent Proficient Percent Advanced

All Students 100 22 43 30 5

MaleFemale

5050

2122

4245

3129

64

National LunchProgram EligilityEligibleNot EligibleInfo not available

4356

3511

4741

1741

18

Race EthnicityWhiteBlackHispanicAsianAmerican IndianNativeHawaiian/PacificIslanderTwo or More Races

711663

2

1453317‡‡23

45394822‡‡50

3681945‡‡21

50226‡‡6

Student classified ashaving a disabilitySDNot SD

1387

5018

3744

1332

15

Student is an EnglishLanguage LearnerELLNot ELL

496

4721

4144

1131

15

‡ Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011Mathematics Achievement.

Page 25 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Mathematics Results



MaleFemale

5149

2830

3941

2624

75


4258

4518

3941

1532

29


7416431

2

22662613‡‡‡

43264125‡‡‡

2971831‡‡‡

60532‡‡‡


1288

7025

2341

527

16


298

5729

2740

725

106

‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment Program (NAEP) 2011Mathematics Achievement.

Page 26 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 4 Reading Results



MaleFemale

5050

3831

3336

2426

67


4555 51

21

3236

1533

210


7017630

2

26675119‡‡36

37242933‡‡31

3071733‡‡19

71315‡‡14


1387

7330

1736

827

27


397

6733

2635

725

07

# Rounds to zero

‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment.

Page 27 of 29



NAEP 2011 Grade 8 Reading Results



MaleFemale

5050

2818

4743

2435

24


4258

3514

4644

1837

04


7416431

1

18462519‡‡‡

46435027‡‡‡

33102539‡‡‡

30114‡‡‡


1288

6719

2746

631

03


298

5222

4045

830

03

# Rounds to zero

‡ Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. Some apparent differences between estimates may not be statistically significant. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP), 2011 Reading Assessment.

Page 28 of 29



Grade Subject Participation Rate forStudents withDisabilities

Standard Error Participation Rate forLimited EnglishProficient Students

Standard Error

4 MathReading

8575

2.03.1

7393

3.32.4

8 MathReading

7363

2.53.3

8379

4.74.5

Page 29 of 29

Date post:	06-Mar-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	tamara-paris-collins
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

AER Combined Report

Documents