AFTER 500 YEARS COLUMBUS EGG PROBLEM HAS FINALLY BEEN SOLVED

Unforgettable, unforgivable, Stefan...(Si veda anche la foto con cui si apre il Reprint di Omero Speri e Piero Zorzi nella I Parte di questo

stesso numero/See also the photograph which appears in the Reprint by Omero Speri and Piero Zorzi in the first

Part of this same number)

Marinov: Annus Horribilis(The Story of) A Payed Advertisement Published by Nature

(Stefan Marinov)

The year l996 will be an earthquake year for conventional physics: many formulas in thetextbooks will be changed, many century-old dogmas will be renounced and many saints willbe de-sainted. This radical change had to begin tens of years ago but the lack of glasnost inphysics all over the world has delayed it and instead to have evolutional step-by-stepreformations and several lighter earthquakes, now there will be a tremendous one. Vousl'avez voulu, Georges Dandins!

By my half-a-century experimental and theoretical work I showed the following (seereferences in my 16 books, 60 refereed papers, 8 paid advertisements and numerous papersand editor's comments in the journal DEUTSCHE PHYSIK edited by me):

1. The principle of relativity is wrong. Indeed, I rneasured three times optico-mechanicallyand once electromagnetically the Earth's absolute velocity. Its magnitude is 350 km sec-1

wlth equatorial coordinates of its apex d = -20° , a = 12h (approx.).

2. The principle of equivalence is wrong. Indeed, my interferometric "coupled mirrors"experiment which was carried out during a year showed that when the laboratory'sacceleration was kinematic (acceleration with respect to distant stars), the laboratory'svelocity changed, while when it was dynamic (gravitational attraction by the Earth) therewas no change.

3. The energy conservation law is wrong. My machines MAMIN COLIU and VENETIN COLIUwhich work with zero, or near to zero, Lenz effect, and SIBERIAN COLIU which works withanti-Lenz effect violated this law. Only because of lack of money I could not close theenergetic cycle in the first two, but the third one was not expensive and I could run it as aperpetuum mobile. The day when I shall present this machine at a press-conference will bethe start-day for the earthquake.

4. The Lorentz equation is wrong. If there are two electric charges q , q' moving withvelocities v , v' and the vector-distance from q' to q is r , according to the Lorentz equationthe force with which q'v' acts on qv is given by the following Grassmann formula

Marinov: Annus Horribilis http://itis.volta.alessandria.it/episteme/ep6/ep6-marin.htm

1 of 10 Monday 23 March 2015 08:41 PM

fG = (m 0qq'/4p r3){(v.r)v' - (v.v')r}. (1)

Numerous experiments done by other authors (Hering's experiments are from thebeginning of the century!) and by me showed that the force acting on qv can be not onlytransverse to its velocity, as required by (1), but also longitudinal. Any rational man whenseeing at least one falsifying experiment rejects the respective formula (Popper), howeverfor thousands and thousands of Betonköpfe [heads made with ferro-concrete!] even hundredexperiments were not enough. In the photograph [not included in the original] there is onesuch falsifying experiment which (as well as the other) can be carried out by children: Acylindrical magnet is cut along one of its axial planes and the one half is turned up-down(the magnetic forces themselves do the rotation). Around this magnet, there is à troughfilled with mercury in which the copper ring which can be seen at right swims (the childrentake salt solution and suspend the ring on threads). After sending current of some tens ofamperes from the battery at left, which is regulated by the rheostat, the ring begins torotate. That's all!

5. The Lorentz-Marinov equation is the right one. As according to (1) f'G is not equal andoppositely directed to fG , I obtained Marinov formula by the most simple and naturalsymmetrization of (1) (take into account that r = -r')

fM = (fG - f'G)/2 = (m 0qq'/8p r3){(v'.r)v + (v.r)v' - 2(v.v')r} . (2)

Proceeding from (2), and assuming F ¹ 0 , ¶ A/¶ t ¹ 0 , I obtained by the most simplecalculations that the force with which an electric system acts on a test charge q moving withvelocity v is

f/q = -gradF - ¶ A/¶ t + v´ B + vS = Elor + v´ B + vS , (3)

where F , A are the electric and magnetic potentials generated by the system at the point ofthe charges location, Blor = rotA is the Lorentz magnetic intensity, Swhit = -divA/2 is theWhittaker magnetic intensity and

Bmar = -(m 0/8p ) q'(v´ v')(r.v)/v2r3 ,

Smar = -(m 0/8p ) q'(v.v')(r.v)/v2r3 , (4)

are the Marinov vector and scalar magnetic intensities. B = Blor + Bmar is called vectormagnetic intensity and S = Swhitt + Smar is called scalar magnetic intensity. (3) is called theLorentz-Marinov equation. If neglecting the last term and under B we understand Blor weobtain the Lorentz equation which I call the Lorentz-Grassmann equation. That's the wholetheory!

6. The angular momentum conservation law is wrong. My Bul-Cub machine withinterrupted current and rotating Ampere bridge with interrupted current rotated under theaction of internal forces only. Marinov's formula allows violation of the angular momentumconservation law as the magnetic forces with which two charges interact are equal andoppositely directed but may not lie on the line connecting them.

7. It is impossible to violate the momentum conservation law in electromagnetism. Obviousconclusion from Marinov's formula.

8. Displacement current does not exist. For closed circuits both Grassmann and Marinovformulas do not allow violation of the momentum and angular momentum conservationlaws as the first terms in (1) and (2) contain total differentials. As conventional physicsbelieves in the displacement current of Maxwell, it accepts that all currents always areclosed. I showed by numerous experiments that there is no displacement current (neither invacuum nor in dielectrics) and one can interrupt the circuits by the help of condensers. Atthe age of 15 I understood that displacement current is a phantasmagoria and presented tomy teacher in Sofia the following objection: "If the displacement current between the platesof a condenser acts with magnetic forces on other currents, then according to Newton's thirdlaw the other currents must act with magnetic forces on the displacement current and set it



in motion. But how, comrade teacher, can vacuum be set in motion?" Teacher's answer was:"Shut up, child!"

9. The gauge transformations are illegitimate. According to conventional physics not thepotentials but the intensities determine the motion of the test charge (exactly the opposite istrue), and thus any change of the potentials which leaves the intensities the same isallowable, i.e. one can calibrate the potentials. It is easy to see that the calibration divA = 0 isallowable. Thus conventional physics believes that a really existing force, the Whittakerforce fw = -qvdivA/2 = qvSwhitt can be put equal to zero. Monstrosity! To see the action of fw

take two metal spheres the one charged positively and the other negatively. Put around oneof the spheres a circular wire along which current flows, so that it is perpendicular to theline connecting the spheres. When connecting the spheres by a wire and current begins toflow, the circular wire begins to rotate. The only force which acts on the circular wire is fw .

10. There is no propagation of interaction. As only mass can move from one point toanother, "interaction" can be only a ghost. But a rational man does not believe in ghosts. onthe other hand, the mathematical expressions of Bmar and Smar show that the "fields" cannotpropagate in space with a certain velocity, as Bmar and Smar depend on the direction ofmotion of the test charge. To these people who may object that one is not sure whether theLorentz-Marinov equation is the right one, my answer is: Until the day when some falsifyingexperiment should be presented (ths day will never come!) the world is impelled to accept itas true.

11. Potential, radiation and radiation reaction electric intensities. These three kinds ofintensities can be obtained if putting in the expression for the Lorentz electric intensity Elor

(see (3)) the observation electric and magnetic potentials

F = q/4p e 0r , A = m 0qv/4p r

with r = r' - v'.r'/c , v = v' + u'r'/c, (5)

where r , v , u are distance, velocity and acceleration at the observation moment t and r' , v' ,u' at the advanced mornent t' = t - r/c (conventional physics wrongly calls t' "retardedmoment"). Conventional physics, following Lienard and Wiechert, wrongly writes A with v' .For this reason conventional physics obtains only the potential and radiation intensities,Epot , Erad , and artificially introduces the radiation reaction intensity Erea coming tophantasmagoric "self-accelerations". Proceeding from (5) I (and any child who candifferentiate!) obtained also the radiation reaction intensity Erea = -m 0qw/6p c , where w = w'

is the charge's super-acceleration. Erad = m 0qr'´ {(r' - v'r'/c)´ u'}/4p (r' - v'.r'/c) is due tomoving mass (radiated energy), as charges moving with acceleration lose energy, while Erea

acts on the radiating charge itself. To obtain all radiation effects one has simply to integratethe obtained formulas for a single charge. That's nearly all about radiation ofelectromagnetic waves!

12. There are no "fields". According to the "field-marshals" the "fields" exist physically. Onecan move them and a moving magnetic field produces electric field, etc. When I hear allthese stupidities, I get diarrhea. After repeating the Rowland experiment (a magnetic needlenear a charged disk deviates when the disk is set in rotation), I carried out the inverse one(the disk at rest, the needle rotates) and the co-moving one (disk and needle rotate), takinginstead of a needle a Hall detector. According te the "field-marshals" the inverse experimentmust give the same effect as the direct one (I observed no effect), while the co-movingexperiment must give null result (I observed the same effect as the direct experiment). Theinertial experiments can be done charging a conveyer belt.

13. Current conducting wires become charged positively. Conventional physics asserts thatthey remain neutral (Clausius postulate). Meanwhile always after measurements, therheostat in the photograph [included in the original but not here, due to its poor quality]remained charged and touching it by hand there was a spark. The positive sign wasestablished by the method known to ancient Greeks. Every child explains the effect takinginto account that the positive electrode of the battery "sucks" electrons from the wire whilethe negative electrode "spits" electrons and the former effect is primary.

14. B-machines and S-machines. The electromagnetic machines working on B are called



B-machines and these ones working on S are called S-machines. By the help of the first threefingers of his right hand any child older than 15 can show when looking at the third term in(3) that the B-generators brake. Meanwhile by the help of only one finger any child youngerthan 15 can show when looking at the fourth term in (3) that the S-generators accelerate.

15. The perpetuum mobile SIBERIAN COLIU. Swhitt produced by the first term in (2) and for acomplete circuit is null. For this reason can be observed only at interrupted circuits (seeitem 9). However Smar can be different from zero also for a complete circuit. Why then hasnobody observed it? - Because all people have worked with cylindrical or quasi-cylindricalmagnets for which Smar = 0 . Who has cut a cylindrical rnagnet in two pieces rotating the onehalf up-down? - NOBODY!!! The first man who has done this is called Gennadi Nicolaev andlives in Tomsk [... - Russian words follow]. For this reason I called this magnet the SIBERIANCOLIU magnet and the perpetuum mobile which I constructed with it is the SIBERIAN COLIUmachine. The machine shown in the photograph [once again not included in the original] is aSIBERIAN COLIU machine. It will work as a perpetuum mobile if the driving torqueproduced by the current induced in the ring when it will be set in rotation with a certainvelocity will be larger than the friction torque. I constructed this machine in the photographin 1993 and the last three years I did nothing else than to try to increase its driving torqueand decrease its friction torque. The driving torque was produced only by the S (i.e., Smar )currents. Smar is very strong near the cutting plane, from the one side positive, from theother negative. The dozens of my SIBERIAN COLIU machines are presented withphotographs in DEUTSCHE PHYSIK.

16. All conventional theories for the origin of Earth's magnetization are wrong. If rotating acylindrical piece of any metal by a boring machine, one sees that it becomes magnetized.Conventional physics believes first that only ferromagnetics become magnetized and secondthat the magnetization is proportional to the angular rotational velocity, as this waspromulgated by Barnett. My friend C. Monstein demonstrated that the magnetization isproportional to the linear rotational velocity and I called this the Monstein-Barnett effect.Proceeding from the Monstein-Barnett effect I calculated the magnetization of the Earth, theSun and the planets, obtaining excellent coincidences with the measured values. As Venus isthe only planet whose nucleus is liquid, it is not magnetized. The most cherishedconventional theory for Earth's magnetization is the "unipolar dynamo theory" of Elsasser.It is ridiculous, as a unipolar machine can work only at the existence of sliding contacts andmoving with respect to each other parts.

17. Magretic energy does exist. By the most elementary speculations and calculations Ishowed that: a) the gravitational energy of two masses is not a negative quantitiy, asaccepted by conventional physics, but a positive quantity, b) the gravitational potentialgenerated by all masses of the universe is equal to c2 , c) electricity and gravity are twocompletely analogical sciences from a mathematical point of view. The only difference isthat the gravitational "charges" are the proper masses m0 = m/(1 - v2/c2)1/2 and that negativemasses do not exist. There are no other differences. Thus a magretic energy, i.e., a"magnetic kind" of energy in gravity must exist and gravity is to be called gravimagretism(this is the title of part IV of my encyclopaedic work CLASSICAL PHYSICS). I proposed a verysimple experiment which can reveal the existence of magretic energy. This experiment,moreover, can serve for measurement of the Earth's absolute velocity.

18. The recession hypothesis for the galaxies is wrong. I call stellar "red shift" this onewhich is caused by the gravitational action of the star on the emitted by it light, galactic "redshift" this one which is caused by the gravitational action of the respective gaIaxy andcosmic - by all cosmic matter. Conventional physic believes that the big "red shifts" of Iightcoming from remote galaxies are due to their recession velocities. This is a phantasmagoria.The most simple calculation, which can be carried out by any child, shows that they are dueto the gravitational action of all cosmic matter and that they are proportional not to thedistance of the emitting galaxy (or quasar) but to the square of this distance. I showed thatthe experimental data fit much better to a square plot. Respectively, instead of a Hubbleconstant, a Hubble-Marinov constant is te be introduced, for which the children obtain thestrictly defined value HM

2 = 2p g m /3c2 , where g is the gravitationa constant and m is theaverage mass density in the Universe.

NOTE. On the 5 March 1996 I submitted to NATURE my paper AFTER 500 YEARS COLUMBUS-



EGG-PROBLEM HAS FINALLY BEEN SOLVED, in which I show how a body can be maintainedin a state of UNSTABLE equilibrium (problem which, contrary to the general opinion,Columbus has NOT solved). My "Marinov egg" is supported by magnetic forces. If it hasSPHERICAL form, it has three degrees of freedom (the Euler angles) free and representsmoreover a PERPETUUM MOBILE. If before the 1 May the paper will not appear in thescientific columns of NATURE, I shall publish it as a paid advertisement. In the first (orsecond) case 15 days after the publication I shall present my SIBERIAN COLIU perpetuunmobile at a press conference.

Stefan Marinov

Morellenfeldgasse 16, A-8010 Graz

- - - - -

[The previous pages are reproduced from pp. 34-35 of Marinov's Deutsche Physik(International Glasnost Journal on Fundamental Physics), Vol. 5, N. 19, July-September 1996,and appeared in Nature, Vol. 380, N. 6572, 28 March 1996, p. xiv, as a payed Advertisement,with the attached NOTE as reported. Marinov extensively explains later on in his journal(pp. 40-45) how he tried to publish instead the following text, but that he was told that: "weare enable to publish the advertisement unless [this note] is deleted [...] we would naturallyrefund your money" (letter from Nature, 15th March 1996), so that he had to accept at lastthe publication of an "amended" version.]

> In my advertisement (whose text is published on p. 34 of this issue) the following NOTE wasattached:

NOTE. In 1986 Dr. Maddox, the then-editor of NATURE, accepted for publication my big paper"Experimental violations of the principles of relativity, equivalence, and conservation ofenergy and angular momentum". During my visit in March 1987 he personaily began tocompose this paper on his computer and I stayed in his office and corrected any sheet whichhe gave me. He could not compose the whole paper and I left London. However during a yearthe composition of the paper remained, as Schubert's symphony, unvollendet. Thus in June1988 I flew to London and composed the paper myself in NATURE's composition office. Thepaper had to appear on the 18 August 1988 but because of the Benveniste's case ìtspublìcatiori was postponed for the 13 October. "I do not have the stomach for a second battle



in such a short tirme" wrote to me Dr. Maddox on the 29 July. This paper is still notpublished. If the paper will not appear in the scientifìc columns of NATURE until the 1 May1996, I shall publish it as a paid advertisement. In the first (or second) case 15 days after thepublicatìon of the paper I shall present my perpetuum mobile SIBERIAN COLIU at a pressconference.

As in a week or so after my 13-February-letter no answer came from Mrs. Smith, I asked heron the phone which is the matter. She told me that there are problems with the NOTE andthat she has to consult Dr. Campbell and Dr. Maddox. Until the 26 February no answer cameand I phoned again. [...] [The conclusion of this story has already been mentioned: afterNature's refusal of 15th March, Marinov proposed a different shortened version, which wasfound acceptable: "I can confirm that your amended paragraph of today is acceptable forpublication" [loc. cit., p. 45].

- - - - -

[The following one is Nature's letter of 26th January 1996 (see the quoted issue of DeutschePhysik, p. 38) which refused a paper proposed by Marinov only a few days before, namely on22nd January 1996. It was this circumstance which forced him to ask for the publication ofthe payed advertisement above.]



MARINOV'S NOTE.

First I would like to note that if an editor has pricks of conscience when rejecting a paper, henever mentions in bis rejecting letter (if he decides such a letter to write!) the title of thepaper and the date of submission. The same does Dr. Campbell in his above letter. Thus thetitle of my rejected article was

EXPERIMENTAL VIOLATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLES OF RELATIVITY, EQUIVALENCE, ANDCONSERVATION OF ENERGY AND ANGULAR MOMENTUM,

and it was submitted on the 22 January 1996 by post.

This paper, as a matter of fact, was accepted for publication by Dr. Maddox in April 1986 andin final form in June 1988 but it never appeared in NATURE (see the story in detail in thefollowing pages). The paper, as composed by me in June in London was published in THETHORNY WAY OF TRUTH, Part III (1988), p. 146.

But Dr. Campbell allowed to me to publish an advertisenìent in NATURE and in her fax of the9 February Mrs. Smith wrote me that the price for two pages will be 5290 £.



- - - - -

[Furthermore, on April 1996, after a new correspondence's exchange, Dr. Campbell wrote toMarinov the following final letter, which is published at p. 50 of the quoted issue of DeutschePhysik, together with a comment of our poor friend Stefan*.]



> Only in religion and similar AUTHORITATIVE spiritual and ideological domains are there"orthodox" and "unorthodox" views. In physics there are views confirmed or rejected byexperiments. Of course, there are views for whose verification there are no experiments, orcontradictory views which predict the same experiments. However a FORMULA can beeither right or wrong, a formula cannot be "orthodox" or "unorthodox". In my writings Ipresent FORMULAS. And I present EXPERIMENTS which can be calculated by these formulasand which cannot be calculated by the formulas of "orthodox" physics.

- - - - -

[* On the morning of July 15th 1997, Stefan Marinov committed suicide in Graz, the Austriantown where he lived very poorly since many years as an exile. As far as his scientific activityis concerned, since the times of the previous Advertisement, he had the resources to editthree more numbers of Deutsche Physik, namely NN. 20, 21 and 22: the very last one is datedApril-June 1997...



More information about this singular figure of dissident XXth Century physicist can befound in the article N. 13 ("In Stefan Marinov memoriam") published at the web page:

http://www.dipmat.unipg.it/~bartocci/listast.htm .]



Date post:	22-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	harishkumarsingh
View:	8 times
Download:	3 times

AFTER 500 YEARS COLUMBUS EGG PROBLEM HAS FINALLY BEEN SOLVED

Documents