Aging in Place: Issues Facing
Manitoba Seniors
Juliette E. Cooper, PhD, OT(C), FCAOT
Professor Emeritus, Department of Occupational Therapy
University of Manitoba
Centre on Aging27th Annual Spring Research Symposium
May 3, 2010
‘Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam, be it ever
so humble, there’s no place like home…John Howard Payne, ca 1823
What I Will Cover
• home and aging
• a model and some determinants
• environmental competence and housing
• Aging in Place – some considerations
• Canada’s seniors – living arrangements, income, cost
of accommodation
• extrapolation to Manitoba
What is “Home”?
• is it a physical space?
• is it a social construct?
• is it a state of mind?
Meaning of “Home”“A home fulfills many needs: a place of self-expression, a vessel of memories,
a refuge from the outside world, a cocoon where we can feel nurtured and let
down our guard.”
“As we change and grow throughout our lives, our psychological
development is punctuated not only by meaningful emotional relationships
with people, but also by close affective ties with a number of significant
physical environments…”
“Those of us fortunate enough to own or rent a home that fits our needs
may never realize the depth of its emotional significance until we lose it,
through divorce, natural disaster, or old age.”
“For many people, the longer they live their lives in one place, the more they
become attached to it – particularly if the time spent in that place included
fulfilling human relationships.”(Marcus, 1995, pp. 4,221,244)
Aging and the Concept of “Home”• growing old in familiar surroundings with familiar faces and familiar
routines can provide contentedness
• moves associated with growing old can be positive; improved housing can
improve quality of life, there may be an increased sense of security
• for some, aging in place means “rootedness”, for others “rigidity”
A study using the data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and
the Health Survey for England found:
• residential mobility declined as age increased
• rates of residential mobility were slightly higher for those who had a
greater number of functional limitations
• the majority of individuals who had spent most of their adult life in their
current home reported feeling “part of the area”, regardless of the
socioeconomic status of the area
• age and aging in place contributed to a feeling of belonging, but not
necessarily to feelings of well-being
• well-being may contribute to feeling of belonging, not the other way
around(Gilleard et al., 2007)
Aging and the Concept of “Home”
In the United States, Golant (2008) stated that a familiar dwelling:
• provides comfort
• gives rise to feelings of control and independence
• allows seniors to maintain continuity with the past
• home and community were seen as the most desirable settings for coping
with changes in health and function
• assistance provided in the home setting ranged from IADLs (housekeeping,
shopping, banking) to ADLs (bathing, dressing, medication management) to
skilled nursing care to behaviour monitoring
• most of these services (88%) were provided by family members (spouses,
daughters)
Sense of Well-being
Feeling of Belonging
Sense of Connectedness
(Gilleard et al., 2007)
Aging and the Concept of “Home”
“Home” provides a:
Person-Environment-Occupation Model
(Law et al., 1996)
PERSON ENVIRONMENT
OCCUPATION
Definitions
What is “Person”?
“…a unique being who assumes a variety of roles simultaneously. These
roles are dynamic, varying across time and context in their importance,
duration and significance.”(Law et al., 1996, pp. 15-16)
What is “Environment”?
“Environments are…those situations which occur outside individuals
and elicit responses in them.”(Law, 1991, p. 175)
Environments can include the built environment (dwelling,
neighbourhood, community), climate, as well as domains such as
cultural, social, socio-economic and political environments.
What is “Occupation”?
“Groups of activities and tasks of everyday life, named, organized, and
given value and meaning by individuals and a culture.
Everything people do to occupy themselves…(CAOT, 1997, p.181)
Person-Environment-Occupation Model
(Law et al., 1996)
PERSON ENVIRONMENT
OCCUPATION OCCUPATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
What is “Occupational Performance”?
Occupational Performance is:• the result of a dynamic, interwoven relationship between
persons, environment and occupation over a person’s lifespan;
• the ability to choose, organize, and satisfactorily perform
meaningful occupations that are culturally defined and age
appropriate for looking after oneself, enjoying life, and
contributing to the social and economic fabric of a community.
(CAOT, 1997, p. 181)
PERSONENVIRONMENT
A Change in Any Element of the P-E-O
Can Affect Occupational Performance
ENVIRONMENT
OCCUPATION OCCUPATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
Focusing on the
Physical Environment…
Key Determinants of Health
1. Income and social status
2. Social support networks
3. Education and literacy
4. Employment/working conditions
5. Social environments
6. Physical environments
7. Personal health practices and coping skills
8. Healthy child development
9. Biology and genetic endowment
10. Health services
11.Gender
12.Culture(Public Health Agency of Canada, n.d.)
In the built environment,
factors related to housing,
indoor air quality, and the
design of communities and
transportation systems can
significantly influence our
physical and psychological
well-being.
Determinants of Active Aging
Gender
Social
determinants
Culture
Economic
determinants
Active
Ageing
Health and
social services
Behavioural
determinants
Personal
determinants
Physical
environment
(Adapted from WHO, 2007, p.5)
What Does “Active Aging” Mean?
The ability to maintain control over one’s immediate surroundings
and to function freely in an environment that is safe, secure and
appropriate is linked on the one hand to the characteristics of the
individual (physiological, psychological) and on the other hand to the
characteristics of the environment in which that individual lives
(economic, social and housing).(Maltais, Trickey & Robitaille, 1989)
Active ageing is the process of optimizing opportunities for health,
participation and security in order to enhance quality of life as people
age.(WHO, 2007, p.5)
Housing is Obviously a Critical
Component of the Physical Environment
PERSONENVIRONMENT
A Change in Any Element of the P-E-O
Can Affect Occupational Performance
ENVIRONMENT
OCCUPATION OCCUPATIONAL
PERFORMANCE
“Environmental Competence”
Time
• physical capacity changes as a person ages
• this change affects a person’s ability to interact with the environment
• “environmental competence” declines
Environmental Competence
Evolution of the Thinking About
Housing for Seniors
(Filion et al., 1992)
Environmental Competence
Traditional Home/Institution Approach
Time
Home
Institution
(e.g., nursing
home, chronic
care hospital)
Environmental Competence
(Filion et al., 1992)
Environmental Competence
Continuum of Adjustment Perspective
Time
Environmental Competence
(Filion et al., 1992)
Institution
Home
Adapted
Housing
Environmental Competence
Maximization of Choice Perspective
Time(Filion et al., 1992)
1.= Shelter Housing
2.= Granny Flats
3.= Support Services
4.= Design Alterations
Environmental Competence
Institution
Home
2.
3.
1.
4.
Environmental Competence
Aging in Place Perspective
Time
Home
(Filion et al., 1992)
Support
Services &
Design
Alterations
Institution
Environmental Competence
So, what is Aging in Place?
Definitions of Aging in Place
• …not having to move from one’s present residence in order to secure
necessary support services in response to changing needs.(Pastalan, 1990)
• Aging in place refers to living where you have lived for years, typically not
in a health care environment, using products, services, and conveniences
which allow you to remain home as circumstances change.”(aginginplace.com, n.d.)
• Staying in one’s home and community.
• Moving to a new community with the intent of remaining there for as long
as possible.(Wick & Zanni, 2009)
• “…opportunity to remain in one’s community…”(Manitoba Government, n.d.)
What are Housing Options for Aging in
Place?
• single detached house
• apartment
• condominium
• co-op housing
• movable dwelling (mobile home)
• garden suite/granny flat
• dedicated seniors’ housing – apartments, homes
• sheltered housing
• congregate housing
• assisted living facility
• stand alone facilities work best if they provide services at both ends of the
continuum – low levels of need and high levels of need.
• the ideal solution would be to provide assisted living amenities within the
confines of residential living.(Bhushan, 2010)
Interior Design Elements Support Aging
in Place
“Habitability” (Demirbilek & Demirkan, 1998)
• minimum number of levels to decrease need for stairs
• good lighting and contrast of surfaces
• furnishings and flooring to decrease risk of falls
• hand rails for stairs – properly installed
• lever door handles, taps
• illuminated lighting controls
• wall switches and outlets within reach of upper limb
• alarm system – auditory and visual, monitored
• rounded corners – counters, furniture
• furniture at correct height
Universal Design• the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the
greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized
design.
• accessible, adaptable, aesthetic, affordable(Mace, n.d.)
Examples of Universal Design
http://www.intheworks.biz/graphics/universal_kitchen_movable.jpg
Examples of Universal Design
http://www.nahbmonday.com/capsco/editor_images/Universal_Design_Demonstration_House_in_VA_for_e-issue.jpg
Community Design Elements Support
Aging in Place
“Age-Friendly Community”• transportation - flexible, affordable, available
• parking - handicap
• mobility – sidewalks (in good repair, cleared of ice and snow), access to
public buildings, traffic control
• safety – outdoor lighting, personal safety in all environments
• opportunities to maintain or establish meaningful social relationships
• social activities – affordable, accessible, appropriate
• communication systems – telephone, media, internet, emergency
contact(Menec et al., 2007)
Elements to Consider in Community
Housing Accessibility in both indoor and outdoor environments
• layout and design features of living space
• maintenance of living space
• removal of ice and snow outdoors
• access to local services – transportation, bank, grocery, pharmacy, medical
care, community centre
Safety and security
• design promotes safety, privacy
• help is available when needed – community and formal support services
• provision for dealing with cognitive impairment
Choice - of housing options
Affordability
• equal access to housing options
• affordable
Communication and connection
• ability to maintain family connections, participate in community life
Equality and dignity
• ability to be equal, respected participants in the community, to maintain
self-esteem, self-worth(Gnaedinger & Doyle, 1999; Manitoba Government, n.d., WHO, 2007)
Aging in Smaller Urban Areas• availability of appropriate housing, for all income ranges
• options for and flexibility of transportation – shuttle bus to grocery,
volunteer drivers, Handi-van
(Menec et al., 2007)
“Service-rich”communities:• have an array of formal services (acute care, home care, long-term care)
• have appropriate and affordable housing
• have recreation/volunteer-based activities
• have appropriate, affordable transportation
• provide services available “at the right time, at the right place, for the right
duration” (p. e154)
• provide services that are accessible (no waiting lists), affordable for all, are
coordinated, on a continuum, seamless
• have environments that meet peoples’ economic, health, cultural and
spiritual needs
• support independence
• provide quality of life for seniors(Davenport et al., 2009)
Aging in Rural Areas
Rural SaskatchewanAbility to access services is affected by:
• weather and state of roads
• limited availability of public transportation
• availability of health professionals
• lack of trained service providers(MacKenzie, 2001)
Atlantic Canada• there has been an out-migration of younger families from rural areas in
Atlantic Canada because of loss of jobs. One consequence has been the
seniors in Atlantic Canada are moving from rural to urban areas to be closer
to primary health care and other formal services, amenities and informal
support.
• the value of housing in rural areas is less than that in urban areas. This can
preclude a senior moving from a rural home to an urban centre. (Davenport et al., 2009)
Key Considerations for Aging in Place
Collins (2002), using the Aging in Manitoba database to investigate
the predictors of relocation of seniors, found that the key predictors
were:• older age
• renter status
• increased dependency in instrumental activities of daily living
• decreased participation in socially oriented leisure activities
• concerns about adequacy of income
Implications of these findings for service needs:• meal preparation
• laundry
• shopping
• managing finances
• housekeeping
• yard work
• home maintenance and repairs
• home modifications
• home structural repairs
• transportation
• senior centres
• recreation facilities
• recreation activities
• visitation
• financial assistance
• financial alternatives
• safe, accessible, affordable housing
Canada’s Seniors: Can they Afford to Age in Place?
Canada’s Seniors
2004 – 4.1 million persons age 65 or older
Living Arrangements (2001 Census)
• 93% in private dwellings, 7% in collective dwellings (primarily nursing homes,
hospitals)
• of those who live in private dwellings, 69% are in houses, 29% in apartments,
1% in mobile homes
• housing preferences shift with aging - of private householders aged 85+, 58%
are in houses, 41% are in apartments (rental or condominium)
• 45% live with spouse/partner, 27% live alone, 18% with children/grandchildren,
7% in an institution, 3% with others.
• institutional residency is 2% for those age 65-74, 32% for those age 85 and
over
• rate of institutionalization has declined in last 30 years – home care
programs and community support allows seniors to stay in their homes longer.
• health status and functional abilities are key considerations in choice of living
arrangements(Clark, 2005)
Canada’s Seniors – Income (2003 dollars)
Median After-tax Income of Seniors, 2003
Canada Manitoba
Couples $36,500 $36,700
Unattached Females $18,200 $17,700
Unattached Males $20,200 $19,600
Percentage of Seniors’ Income Allocated to Accommodation, 2003
Age 55-64 Age 65-74 Age 75 +
Couples 22.9% 23.7% 28.1%
Unattached Females 31.4% 28.6% 33.9%
Unattached Males 33.3% 35.4% 32.9%
(Turcotte & Schellenberg, 2007)
Cost of Housing - Affordability• cost of housing includes
• rent/condominium fees, mortgage/loan payments for the dwelling
• electricity
• heating fuel
• water, other municipal services
• property taxes
• repairs, upkeep
• “Housing Affordability Problem” is defined as: 30% or more of before-tax
household income is spent on shelter
• in 2001, housing affordability problems affected:
•18% of Canadian seniors
• seniors with the lowest household income
• seniors who lived alone
• seniors from visible minority groups, recent immigrants living in large
cities
• owners of high-value homes (taxes, utilities, municipal fees)(Clark, 2005)
Cost: A Challenge for Seniors Housing in
Winnipeg
Canadian Elder Standard - “typical” cost of basic needs in 5 Canadian
cities (Halifax, Montreal, Toronto, Calgary, Vancouver) in 2001 (adjusted to 2008
values using city-specific CPI)
Monthly rent for single person, couple:Halifax = $687, $704 Montreal = $569, $588 Toronto = $1020, $1029
Calgary = $886, $878 Vancouver = $855, $857(MacDonald et al., 2010)
Examples of ranges for monthly rent for Winnipeg seniors housing (1 bedroom):
• “rent geared to income”
• “27% of gross income”
• $3450(Age and Opportunity, 2009)
Median annual income in Manitoba, 2006:
55-64 years $28,620 ($2385/month), $644/mo available for rent
65+ years $20,605 ($1717/month), $464/mo available for rent(derived from Ryan & Blandford, 2009)
Do We Have a Problem?
But…There’s No Place like Home
ReferencesAge and Opportunity (2009). Winnipeg housing directory for older adults. Retrieved from
http://www.ageopportunity.mb.ca/files/Wpg_Housing_Directory_2009.pdf
Aginginplace.com (n.d.). Retrieved from http://aginginplace.com
Bhushan, S. (2010). Aging in place. Retrieved from http://www.ltlmagazine.ciom
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1997). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa ON: CAOT
Publications.
Clark, W. (2005) What do seniors spend on housing? Canadian Social Trends, Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 11-008.
Collins, D.C. (2002). A longitudinal perspective of residential relocation among Manitoba seniors. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of
Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Davenport, J., Rathwell, T.A., Rosenber,g, M.W. (2009). Aging in Atlantic Canada: Service-rich and service-poor communities. Healthcare
Policy, 5, e145-e160.
Demirbilek, O. & Demirkan, H. (1998). Involving the elderly in the design process. Architectural Science Review, 41, 157-164.
Filion, P., Wister, A., Coblentz, E.J. (1992). Subjective dimensions of environmental adaptation among the elderly: a challenge to models of
housing policy. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 10, 3-32.
Gilleard, C., Hyde, M., Higgs, P. (2007). The impact of age, place, aging in place, and attachment to place on the well-being of the over 50s in
England. Research on Aging, 29, 590-605.
Gnaedinger, N. & Doyle, V. (1999). Aging together – aging in place: Seniors living in age-mixed housing co-ops in Canada. Mature Medicine
Canada, 2, 307-308.
Golant, S.M. (2008). Commentary: irrational exuberance for the aging in place of vulnerable low-income older homeowners. Journal of
Aging and Social Policy, 20, 379-397.
Law, M. (1991). The environment: a focus for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 171-179.
Law, M., Cooper, B.A., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., Letts, L. (1996). The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: a transactive approach
to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9-23.
MacDonald, B-J, Andrews, D., Brown, R.L. (2010) The Canadian Elder Standard – pricing the cost of basic needs for the Canadian elderly.
Canadian Journal on Aging, 29, 39-56.
Mace, R. (n.d.) About universal design. Retrieved from: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm
MacKenzie, P. (2001). Aging people in aging places: Addressing the needs of older adults in rural Saskatchewan. Rural Social Work, 6, 74-83.
ReferencesManitoba Government (n.d.). Aging in place. Retrieved from http://www.gov.mb.ca/health/aging inplace/docs/aging_in_place.pdf
Maltais, D., Trickey, F, Robitaille, Y. (1989). Maintaining seniors independence: A guide to home adaptations. Ottawa ON: Canada Mortgage
and Housing.
Marcus, C.C. (1995). House as a mirror of self: exploring the deeper meaning of home. Berkeley CA: Conari Press.
Menec, V.H., Button, C.M., Blandford, A.A., Morris-Oswald, T. (2007). Age-friendly Cities Project, Portage la Prairie, Manitoba, Canada. A
report prepared for the city of Portage la Prairie. Retrieved from Centre on Aging website:
http://www.umanitoba.ca/centres/aging/media/Portage_Report_May_2007.pdfaging/media/Portage_Report_May_2007.pdf
Pastalan, L.A. (Ed.). (1990). Aging in place: The role of housing and support services. New York: Haworth Press.
Public Health Agency of Canada (n.d.) Key determinants of health. Retrieved from:
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ ph-sp/determinants/index-eng.php#key_determinants
Ryan, J. & Blandford, A. (2009). Manitoba seniors, 2006 Census: Labour force and income update. Retrieved from Centre on Aging website:
http://umanitoba.ca/centres/aging/media/Labour_Force_and_Income_Update- 2009.pdf
Turcotte, M. & Schellenberg, G. (2007). A portrait of seniors in Canada. 2006. Ottawa ON: Statistics Canada. Catalogue no. 89-519-XIE.
Wick, J.Y. & Zanni, G.R. (2009). Aging in place: Multiple options, multiple choices. The Consultant Pharmacist, 24 (11), 804-812.
World Health Organization (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/ageing/
publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf