+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Agricultural Price July 2014 Change

Agricultural Price July 2014 Change

Date post: 19-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
10
RURAL DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE Agricultural Price Change 1 July 2014 www.brandonu.ca/rdi/ HIGHLIGHTS • Farm-gate prices in Manitoba have generally been increasing. However, after an adjustment for inflation, the prices show a general declining trend. Thus, farm prices, in general, are not increasing faster than inflation. • For commodities outside the supply-managed sectors of poultry meat, eggs and dairy, the year-to- year variability of prices can vary from +20% to -20% (and the hog price variability has been at least twice as large). • A comparison of overall farm output prices and overall farm input prices showed a decline in the so-called terms of trade in the early 2000s (i.e. input prices increased faster than output prices) but there was an increase in the terms of trade up to mid-2013. • The price of hogs relative to the price of barley shows a flat trend over the 1985 to 2013 period but the fluctuations in the ratio were often more than 40%. • The price of wheat relative to the price of crude oil is now less (although very variable) compared to the calculation for the 1980s and the 1990s. Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development Institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014. WHY AGRICULTURAL PRICE CHANGE? Agriculture is an important sector in rural Manitoba. On-going mechanization (i.e., the use of larger machines) means that there is a declining number of people employed on farms in Manitoba. However, price trends drive many decisions: 1. if input prices are going up relative to output prices, the “cost-price squeeze” forces farmers to increase yields or lower costs in order to say in business; whereas 2. if output prices are going up faster than input prices, farmers have more cash flow to make investments; and 3. another aspect of agricultural price change is that, if prices are more variable, there is greater uncertainty in being able to generate the cash flow to meet bills for expenditures as they come due. The objective of this Factsheet is to show the trends – and the ups and the downs – in the prices of agricultural commodities. We show the data for: • nominal prices (without an adjustment for inflation); • real prices (adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index); and for a few cases • the trend in the output price per dollar of input prices (using either a key input price, such as the hog/barley price ratio for hogs, or using a price index for a basket of outputs divided by the price index for a basket of inputs). Trade analysts define this as the “terms of trade” – is the selling price (for outputs) going up faster or slower than the buying price (for inputs)? FINDINGS Over time, the prices of farm products in Manitoba have generally increased, in nominal terms (i.e. before adjusting for inflation) (Figure 1). Figure 1. Manitoba Farm Product Price Index, All commodities (2007=100)
Transcript

RuRal Development InstItute

Agricultural Price Change

1

July 2014

www.brandonu.ca/rdi/

HigHligHts• Farm-gatepricesinManitobahavegenerallybeenincreasing.However,afteranadjustmentforinflation,thepricesshowageneraldecliningtrend.Thus,farmprices,ingeneral,arenotincreasingfasterthaninflation.

• Forcommoditiesoutsidethesupply-managedsectorsofpoultrymeat,eggsanddairy,theyear-to-yearvariabilityofpricescanvaryfrom+20%to-20%(andthehogpricevariabilityhasbeenatleasttwiceaslarge).

• Acomparisonofoverallfarmoutputpricesandoverallfarminputpricesshowedadeclineintheso-calledtermsoftradeintheearly2000s(i.e.inputpricesincreasedfasterthanoutputprices)buttherewasanincreaseinthetermsoftradeuptomid-2013.

• Thepriceofhogsrelativetothepriceofbarleyshowsaflattrendoverthe1985to2013periodbutthefluctuationsintheratiowereoftenmorethan40%.

• Thepriceofwheatrelativetothepriceofcrudeoilisnowless(althoughveryvariable)comparedtothecalculationforthe1980sandthe1990s.

Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014.

WHy AgRicUltURAl pRice cHAnge?

AgricultureisanimportantsectorinruralManitoba.On-goingmechanization(i.e.,theuseoflargermachines)meansthatthereisadecliningnumberofpeopleemployedonfarmsinManitoba.

However,pricetrendsdrivemanydecisions:

1. ifinputpricesaregoinguprelativetooutputprices,the“cost-pricesqueeze”forcesfarmerstoincreaseyieldsorlowercostsinordertosayinbusiness;whereas

2. ifoutputpricesaregoingupfasterthaninputprices,farmershavemorecashflowtomakeinvestments;and

3. anotheraspectofagriculturalpricechangeisthat,ifpricesaremorevariable,thereisgreateruncertaintyinbeingabletogeneratethecashflowtomeetbillsforexpendituresastheycomedue.

TheobjectiveofthisFactsheetistoshowthetrends–andtheupsandthedowns–inthepricesofagriculturalcommodities.

Weshowthedatafor:

• nominalprices(withoutanadjustmentforinflation);

• realprices(adjustedforinflationusingtheConsumerPriceIndex);andforafewcases

• thetrendintheoutputpriceperdollarofinputprices(usingeitherakeyinputprice,suchasthehog/barleypriceratioforhogs,orusingapriceindexforabasketofoutputsdividedbythepriceindexforabasketofinputs).Tradeanalystsdefinethisasthe“termsoftrade”–isthesellingprice(foroutputs)goingupfasterorslowerthanthebuyingprice(forinputs)?

FinDings

Overtime,thepricesoffarmproductsinManitobahavegenerallyincreased,innominalterms(i.e.beforeadjustingforinflation)(Figure1).

Figure 1. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,Allcommodities(2007=100)

RuRal Development InstItute

Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014. 2

However,therehavebeenwidefluctuationsinfarmproductprices.Wemightnotethefollowingpeaks:

• August,1973,duetoaleapinthepriceofwheat;

• July,1996,duetopeaksinwheat,canola,potatoesandhogsthatalloccurredintheJunetoSeptemberperiodin1996;

• July,2008,duetopeaksinwheatandcanola.PotatoesandcattleandcalvespeakedinSeptember,2008andhogspeakedinFebruary,2009;and,mostrecently

• June,2013,dueagaintoconcurrentpeaksincropandlivestockprices.WheatpeakedinDecember,2012,canolapeakedinMay,2013;potatoespeakedinJuly,2013,cattleandcalvespeakedinSeptember,2013andhogspeakedinAugust,2013(detaileddatanotshown).

Thesepricesindicate“incentives”toinvest–theydonotnecessarilyindicatethatmorecashwasreceivedbyfarmersasoftenthereasonforatemporarypricepeakisthatfarmershavelittletosellduringthatmonth.

pRice tRenDs ADJUsteD FoR inFlAtion

However,whenweadjustthefarm-gatepricesforinflation1,theoverallleveloffarmpricesinManitobawasdecreasingfromthemid-1970stotheearly1990sandsincethen,farm-gatepriceshavegenerallyfollowedthelevelofinflation,butwithfluctuations(Figure2).

Figure 2.ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,Allcommodities,relativetoCPI*

Wecanagainidentifythepeaks(whicharethesamepeaksasinFigure1)butthesepeaksarewithinapatternofdecliningagriculturalprices,relativetoinflation.

Toillustratethedegreeofvariabilityorfluctuationsinagriculturalprices,wehavetakenthemonthlyManitobaFarmProductPriceIndexandcalculated,fortheperiodsince1985,thepercentchangeinpriceforagivenmonth,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear2.

Wesee5periodswheretheindexforallfarmpriceswasdeclining(i.e.thebarsinthechartarebelowzero)forconsecutivemonths(Figure3):

• January,1985toDecember,1987(exceptfortwomonths);

• August,1989toJuly,1992(exceptfortwomonths);

• October,1996toJune,2000(exceptforthreemonths);

• June,2003toMay,2006(exceptfor10months);

• April,2009toJune,2010;and

• anotherpricedeclinethathasstartedinSeptember,2013.

Figure 3.InDecember,2013,theManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex(acrossallcommodities)wasdown11%comparedtothesamemonthtothepreviousyear

Similarly,wesee5periodswheretheindexforallfarmpriceswasincreasingforconsecutivemonths:

• January,1988toJuly,1989;

• August,1992toSeptember,1996(exceptfor2months);

1.TheConsumerPriceIndexisusedtoadjustforinflation.

2.Tocalculatethepercentchange,wehaveusedthedifferenceinlogarithms.Thisgeneratesthesamepercentchangeforagivenabsolutepositiveornegativechange.Forexample,ifIate3cookiesyesterdayand6cookiestoday,ourusualarithmeticwouldshowanincreaseof100%.IfItheneat3cookiestomorrow,thatisadeclineof50%.Byusingthedifferenceoflogarithmstocalculatethepercentchange,thechangeof3cookiesiscalculatedrelativetothegeometricmeanof3and6andthusthecalculationshowsanincreaseof69.3%ifmyconsumptionincreasesfrom3to6cookiesandadeclineof69.3%ifthereisadeclinefrom6to3cookies.

this series of Fact sheets are available for download at http://www.brandonu.ca/rdi/25th/ 3

RuRal Development InstItute

• July,2000toMay,2003;

• June2006toMarch,2009;and

• July,2010toAugust,2013(exceptfortwomonths).

NotethatoutputpriceshavebeendroppingsinceSeptember,2013.

Thereisanoldadageamongoldagriculturaleconomists–“thesolutiontohighpricesishighprices.”Thismeansthatinagriculture,higherworld-widepricesgeneratemoreworld-wideproductionwhichalwayshasreducedprices.JohnMorrissintheJanuary23,2014issueofTheManitobaCo-operator3makesthesamepoint.Henotedthatin1972,weheardthatitwas“differentthistime.”Then,ineachbriefpricerally–1980,1985,1993,1996,2006andthenin2012-13–weheardthis“Theworld’spopulationisgrowing.It’sgettingmoreaffluent,sopeoplewilleatmoremeat.Theyaren’tmakinganymoreland.”

Heconcludeswiththeobservation“Nexttimeyouhearthatit’sdifferentthistime,remember–itwon’tbe.”

pRice tRenDs By coMMoDity gRoUp

Fortheperiod1985todate,thepatternofagriculturalpricechangebycommoditygroupispresentedinthechartsinAppendixA.Tosummarize:

• Croppricessince1985haveshownnoup-wardordown-wardtrend,relativetoinflation(AppendixAFiguresA3,A5,A7,A9andA11);

• However,thevariationofpricesinthisno-trendscenarioislarge.Year-to-yearpricechangesof+20%or-20%are‘typical’(AppendixAFiguresA4,A6,A8,A10andA12);

• Thepricesoflivestockandanimalproductshaveshownageneraldeclineinprices,relativetoinflation,since1985(AppendixAFiguresA13,A15,A17,A19andA21).Theexceptionisthefarm-gatepriceofmilkwhichshowsagenerallyflattrendinAppendixAFigureA23whichmeansthepriceshavegenerallybeenincreasingwiththerateofinflation.Relativetoinflation,therewasaslightrelativedeclineuptotheearly1990s,

aslightrelativeincreaseuptothemid-2000sandthetrendinthefarmgatemilkpricehasbeenflat(i.e.increasingwithinflation)sincetheendof2007;

• Thesupplymanagementsystemforpoultrymeat,eggsandmilkhasmutedthefarm-gatepricevariability(AppendixAFiguresA20,A22andA24);

• Thepricefluctuationforcattleandcalveshasreachedboth+20%and-20%inyear-to-yearchangessince1985(AppendixAFigureA16);and

• Thepriceforhogsshowsmuchmorevariability.Since1985,ayear-to-yearpricechangeof+40%and-40%hasoccurredatleasttwice(AppendixAFigureA18).

oUtpUt pRices RelAtive to inpUt pRices

Above,wehaveadjustedoutputpricesfortherateofinflationasonewaytoshowthe“relative”trendinoutputprices.

Here,wecompareoutputpricestoinputpricestoseewhetherthepriceofanagriculturalproductisincreasingfasterorslowerthanthepricesof(selected)inputstoproducethatproduct.

Bothoutputpricesandinputpricespeakedinthe3rdquarterof2008,thendeclineduptothe4thquarterof2009andincreasedagainupto2013(Figure4).ThemostrecentdatafortheFarmInputPriceIndexreferstothe3rdquarterof2013.

Figure 4. Indexofpricesoffarmoutputsandfarminputs,Manitoba

FARM-level “teRMs oF tRADe”

BytakingtheratiooftheFarmOutputPriceIndexdividedbytheFarmInputPriceIndex,wecan3.SeeMorriss,John(2014)“Differentthistime–again.”TheManitobaCo-operator,January

23,2014,p.4.

RuRal Development InstItute

Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014. 4

calculatethefarm-level“termsoftrade.”Thisratioindicateswhetherfarmoutputpricesareincreasingordecreasingrelativetofarminputprices(Figure5).

Figure 5. Agriculturetermsoftrade:Outputpricesrelativetoinputprices,Manitoba

Outputprices,relativetoinputprices,inManitobaagriculturedeclinedfrom2002tothe2ndquarterof2006,temporarilypeakedinthe3rdquarterof2007,declinedagaintothe3rdquarterof2009beforeincreasingandplateauingfromthe3rdquarterof2011tothe2ndquarterof2013.Recallthatanincreaseinoutputpricesrelativetoinputpricesprovidesfarmerswithsomeleewayintheirinvestmentdecisions.However,anotherrelativedeclineinoutputpriceshasstartedinthe3rdquarterof20134.

Wenowexplorewhetherthepriceofaselectedcommodityisincreasingordecreasingrelativetothepriceofamajorinputsusedtoproducethecommodity.

Thevariationinwheatprices(AppendixBFigureB1)maybecomparedwiththevariationinfertilizerprices(AppendixBFigureB2).Whenwelookattheratioofwheatpricesdividedbyfertilizerprices,theso-called‘termsoftrade’havevariedovertime(Figure6).Therewasageneraldeclineintheearly2000s,aspikeinthe1stquarterin2008beforeasharpdeclinetothe4thquarterof2008followedbysomewhatofanincreaseto2013.Again,thevariability,ratherthanthetrend,maybethemajorobservationhere.

Figure 6. Ratioofwheatpricetofertilizerprice(2010=100),Canada

Feedgrainisamajorinputinhogproduction–anditisaninputwithafluctuatingprice.ThevariationinthepriceofManitobahogsisshowninAppendixBFigureB3andthevariationinthepriceofManitobabarley(amajorfeedgrain)isshowninAppendixBFigureB4.Whenwecalculatetheratioofthepriceofhogstothepriceofbarleytoseewhetherthepriceofhogsisgoingupordownrelativetothepriceofbarley,wefindvirtuallynotrendbutverywidefluctuationsintheratio(Figure7).Thewidevariationsinthehog/barleypriceratioareanamplificationofthevariabilityinthehogprice(AppendixBFigureB3)andthevariabilityinthepriceofbarley(AppendixBFigureB4)5.

Figure 7. Hog/barleypriceratio,Manitoba

4.Thisdeclinehascontinuedinthe4thquarterof2013asportrayedinFigures1and3.

5.TheseobservationsarerelevanttotherequestbyfarmersforapriceinsuranceprogramandtherecentwillingnessoftheGovernmentofManitobatoparticipateinapilotprojecttoevaluatesuchaprogram–see“Manitobajoinsthelivestockpriceinsuranceclub,”ManitobaCo-operator,February26,2014(http://www.manitobacooperator.ca/2014/02/26/manitoba-joins-the-livestock-price-insurance-club/).

Finally,wecomparetheindexofthepriceofwheat(AppendixBFigureB5)withtheindexofthepriceofcrudeoil(AppendixBFigureB6).Petroleumfuelsfarmmachineryandalsopetroleumpricesdrivethepriceoffertilizer.Again,theresultisaveryvariablechartoftherelativeprices(Figure8)6.Inthe1980sandthe1990s,thepriceofwheatrelativetothepriceofcrudeoilfluctuatedupanddownbyafactorof4.Since2000,thefluctuationhasbeen“only”(!)afactorof2.5.Perhapsoneobservationisthatthepriceofwheat,relativetothepriceofcrudeoil,appearstobelowerinthe2000sthaninthe1980sand1990s.

Figure 8. Priceofwheatrelativetopriceofcrudeoilbecamelowerandremainedlowerafter2000,Canada

sUMMARy

Althoughemploymentchangeinagricultureisdrivenmorebytherateofadoptionoflargermachines,thechangeinpricesinagricultureisanindicatoroftheleewayorfinancialcapacityforfarmerstomakeinvestments.

Farm-gatepricesinManitobahavegenerallybeenincreasing,butafteranadjustmentforinflation,thepriceshavegenerallybeendecliningrelativetothepaceofinflation.

Forcommoditiesoutsidethesupply-managedsectorsofpoultrymeat,eggsanddairy,theyear-to-yearvariabilityofpricescanvaryfrom+20%to-20%

this series of Fact sheets are available for download at http://www.brandonu.ca/rdi/25th/ 5

RuRal Development InstItute

(andthehogpricevariabilityhasbeenatleasttwiceaslarge).

Acomparisonofoverallfarmoutputpricesandanoverallfarminputpricesshowedadeclineintheso-calledtermsoftradeintheearly2000s(i.e.inputpricesincreasedfasterthanoutputprices)buttherewasanincreaseinthetermsoftradeuptomid-2013.

Thepriceofhogsrelativetothepriceofbarleyshowsaflattrendoverthe1985to2013periodbutthefluctuationsintheratiowereoftenmorethan40%.

Thepriceofwheatrelativetothepriceofcrudeoilisnowless(althoughveryvariable)comparedtothecalculationforthe1980sandthe1990s.

Certainly,itisanadvantagetofarmersiftheir‘termsoftrade’aremovingintheirfavour(i.e.outputpricesincreasingfasterthaninputprices).Whenthecost-pricesqueezere-appears(i.e.inputpricesareincreasingfasterthanoutputprices),farmerneedtoincreaseyields(morebushelsperacre,morepoundsofporkmarketedpersow,etc.)and/ortheyneedtoreducecostsinordertostayinbusiness.

FURtHeR ReseARcH QUestions

• WhateffectdoestheexchangeratewiththeUnitedStatesandcornpriceshaveonagriculturalpricechange?

Funding for this project was provided by the Manitoba government.

6.Giventheconnectionbetweenthepriceofcrudeoilandthepriceoffertilizer,the2002to2013patterninFigure8isessentiallythesamepatternasthepatternfor2002to2013inFigure6.ThedatainFigure6arequarterlyaverages(i.e.3-monthaverages)whereasmonthlydataareshowninFigure8.

RuRal Development InstItute

Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014. 6

AppenDix A sUppleMentARy cHARts: MAnitoBA FARM pRoDUct pRice inDex

Figure A1. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,Allcommodities,relativetoCPI*

Figure A4. InDecember,2013,theALLCROPSFarmProductPriceIndexwasdown23%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A2. InDecember,2013,theManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex(acrossallcommodities)wasdown11%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A5. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,GRAINS,relativetoCPI*

Figure A3. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,ALLCROPS,relativetoCPI*

Figure A6. InDecember,2013,theGRAINSFarmProductPriceIndexwasdown32%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

this series of Fact sheets are available for download at http://www.brandonu.ca/rdi/25th/ 7

RuRal Development InstItute

Figure A10. InDecember,2013,theVEGETABLES(exceptpotatoes)FarmProductPriceIndexwasdown8%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A7. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,OILSEEDS,relativetoCPI*

Figure A11. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,POTATOES,relativetoCPI*

Figure A8. InDecember,2013,theOILSEEDSFarmProductPriceIndexwasdown20%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A9. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,VEGETABLES(exceptpotatoes),relativetoCPI*

Figure A12. InDecember,2013,thePOTATOESFarmProductPriceIndexwasthesame,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

RuRal Development InstItute

Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014. 8

Figure A13. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,LIVESTOCK&ANIMALPRODUCTS,relativetoCPI*

Figure A14. InDecember,2013,theLIVESTOCK&ANIMALPRODUCTSFarmProductPriceIndexwasup5%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A18. InDecember,2013,theHOGFarmProductPriceIndexwasup2%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A16. InDecember,2013,theCATTLE&CALVESFarmProductPriceIndexwasup8%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A15. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,CATTLE&CALVES,relativetoCPI*

Figure A17. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,HOGS,relativetoCPI*

this series of Fact sheets are available for download at http://www.brandonu.ca/rdi/25th/ 9

RuRal Development InstItute

Figure A19. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,POULTRYMEAT,relativetoCPI*

Figure A20. InDecember,2013,thePOULTRYMEATFarmProductPriceIndexwasdown9%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A24. InDecember,2013,theDAIRYFarmProductPriceIndexwasunchanged,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A22. InDecember,2013,theEGGSFarmProductPriceIndexwasdown2%,comparedtothesamemonthinthepreviousyear

Figure A21. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,EGGS,relativetoCPI*

Figure A23. ManitobaFarmProductPriceIndex,DAIRY,relativetoCPI*

RuRal Development InstItute

Bollman, Ray D., & Ashton, W. Rural Development institute, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, July, 2014. 10

AppenDix B: sUppleMentARy cHARts: pRices FoR cAlcUlAtion oF pRice RAtios FoR DiscUssion oF teRMs oF tRADe

Figure B1. Indexofpriceofwheat(2010=100)Canada

Figure B4. Priceofbarley(dollarpermetrictonne),Manitoba

Figure B2. Indexofpriceoffertilizer(2010=100)Canada

Figure B5. Indexofpriceofwheat(2010=100),Canada

Figure B3. Priceofhogs(dollarsperhundredweight),Manitoba

Figure B6. Indexofpriceofcrudeoil(2010=100),Canada


Recommended