+ All Categories
Home > Documents > AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN...

AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN...

Date post: 07-Jan-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
58
AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY X (1998) FILM A Thesis Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1) Muhammad Aji Akasyah 109026000105 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTEMENT LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2014 M/1435 H
Transcript

AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION

IN AMERICAN HISTORY X (1998) FILM

A Thesis

Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the

Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1)

Muhammad Aji Akasyah

109026000105

ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTEMENT

LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY

STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY

SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH

JAKARTA

2014 M/1435 H

i

ABSTRACT

Muhammad Aji Akasyah, An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination in

American History X (1998) Film, Thesis: English Letters Department, Adab and

Humanities Faculty, State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta,

2014.

This reseach studies about American History X film directed by David

McKeena on 1998. The analysis is aimed to find out how prejudice and

discrimination issues and the relationship between prejudice and discrimination is

described through theories of Prejudice and Discrimination by analyzing the

characters.

From the analysis, there are several characters involved in act of prejudice

and discrimination. After that, it can be concluded that there are two forms of the

relationship between prejudice and discrimination. There are prejudice that does

not lead into discrimination and prejudice that leads into discrimination.

ii

APPROVEMENT

AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN

AMERICAN HISTORY X (1998) FILM

A Thesis

Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the

Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1)

MUHAMMAD AJI AKASYAH

109026000105

Approved by:

Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd

NIP. 19640710 199303 1 006

(Day/Date: )

ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT

LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY

STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH

JAKARTA

2014

iii

LEGALIZATION

Name : Muhammad Aji Akasyah

NIM : 109026000105

Title :An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination in American History X

(1998) Film

The thesis entitled above has been defended before the Letters and

Humanities Faculty’s Examination Comittee onApril 3rd

, 2014. It has already been

accepted as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of strata one.

Jakarta, April 3rd

, 2014

Examination Committee

Signature

Date

1. Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd.

19640710 199303 1 006

(Chair Person) ____________ _________

2. Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum.

19781003 200112 2 002

(Secretary) ____________ _________

3. Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd.

19640710 199303 1 006

(Advisor)

____________ _________

4. Inayatul Chusna, M.Hum.

19780126 200312 2 002

(Examiner I) ____________ _________

5. Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum.

19781003 200112 2 002

(Examiner II) ____________ _________

iv

DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of

my knowledge and belief. It contains no material previously published or written

by another person nor material which to substantial extent has been accepted for

the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of

higher learning, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text.

Jakarta, April 2014

Muhammad Aji Akasyah

v

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

In the name of Allah SWT, The most merciful

and our beloved prophet Muhammad SAW for peace and blessing.

My appreciation in the first place goes to my advisor, Maria Ulfa, M. A,

M. Hum, for her guidance, support, encouragement, and thought in finishing this

thesis.

Many people have helped me in different ways to complete this work. I

would like to thank, particulary, Dr. H. Abdul Wahid Hasyim, MA, the Dean of

the Faculty of Adab and Humanities, Drs. Asep Saefuddin, M.Pd. the Head of the

English Letters Department, Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum, the Secretary of the

English Letters Department. In addition, the writer`s appreciation also goes

toInayatul Chusna, M.Hum., Arif Rahman Hakim M.Hum., and alllecturers of

English Letters Department, who have taught, inspired and educated the writer

during his studying at campus.

The most appreciation goes to my parents, Asmad Effendi and Romlah.

This thesis and all of my work are dedicated to both of them. Their guidance,

advice, prays, and supports are irreplaceable and unchangeable through the time. I

love you both so much. Moreover, I also would like to thank to my brothers and

sisters, Lia, Iqbal, Iqdam, Kheny, and Tia for their support, help, and sharing time.

Another best gratitude goes to all my classmates in C class: Gita, Topik,

Heri, Chris, Kos, Yudaris, Yan, Agus, Yudhi (Mamat), Hafid, Ai, Icha, Erna,

Dwi, Kiki, Ninu, Tiara, Zata, Talitha, Sri, Chusna, Dini and other friends who

vi

can`t be mentioned one by one here. Next, my classmates in literature class:

Andra, Ipin, Agung, Mugni, Suyuti, Vanda, Sapta, Kiput, Aida, Emil, Riri, Isti,

Iis, Nenden, Syifa, Nanda, and all friends who can`t be listed in this paper. Then,

The Bohemians: Gusti, Hakim, Icul. KKN BETA family: Panji, Aponk, Yopie,

Icha, Ruhi, Kiki.My Brothers in Arms; Fian, Ludi, Ilham, Faisal, Harris, Oki.

After that, goes to the best foreigner teachers; Mr. Kim Caula and Mr. Khadri

Fadzil Rahman. Thank you very much for sharing your support, motivation,

thought, laught, and joy.

And my last praise goes to you. You are the biggest part of my support

system. You have give me so much more than I could ever dreamed, your time,

joy, and kindness. Thank you for giving me some memorable songs and I will

always remember your beautiful voice when you are singing. Thank you for not

turning away when things get uncomfortable. Thank you for caring and loving

me. Thank you for everything that you have given me. Thank you for being my

happiness, dear. You are the very best God’s gift to me, thank you very much.

Finally, I hope this paper will be useful and also can give a lot of benefit

for students of English Letters Department who want to do the further research

about Prejudice and Discrimination. And I realize that this paper is far from being

perfect, therefore it is really a pleasure for me to receive some suggestions and

critics.

Jakarta, March 2014

M.A.A

vii

TABLE OF CONTENT

ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... i

APPROVEMENT ............................................................................................. ii

LEGALIZATION ............................................................................................. iii

DECLARATION ............................................................................................... iv

ACKNOWLEDGMENT .................................................................................. v

TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. viii

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background of Study ................................................ 1

B. Focus of Study .......................................................... 6

C. Research Question ..................................................... 6

D. Significance of the Study .......................................... 6

E. Research Methodology.............................................. 7

1. Objectives of the Study ....................................... 7

2. Method of Research ............................................ 7

3. Technique of Data Analysis ................................ 8

4. Instrument of Research ....................................... 9

5. Unit of Analysis .................................................. 9

F. Time and Place .......................................................... 9

CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A. Film Theory ............................................................... 10

1. Character and Characterization Theory .............. 11

viii

2. Prejudice and Discrimination Theory ................. 17

CHAPTER III RESEARCH FINDING

A. Characters Identification ........................................... 23

B. American History X, Prejudice, and Discrimination 25

C. The Relation of Prejudice and Discrimination ......... 42

CHAPTER IV CONCLUSIONS

A. Conclusions ............................................................. 45

BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................. 48

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. Background of Study

Humans usually deal with problems in social life, such as prejudice and

discrimination. Prejudice and discrimination are two things which have relevance.

Both of these can be detrimental to the growth, development, or even integrated in

society, from a small occurrence that only involves two individuals to moreextend

involving group or even a region. This also accompanied by acts of violence

which are very harmful and destructive.

Prejudice and discrimination is a complex and a huge problem in social

phenomena from the past until this time. First known use of word prejudice was in

13th

century1 and discrimination was in 1648.

2 The first example is the negative

stereotypes and prejudices against Muslims fuelling discrimination especially in

education and employment. Muslim women in Europe are being denied jobs and

girls prevented from attending regular classes just because they wear traditional

forms of dress, such as the headscarf, Men can be dismissed for wearing beards

associated with Islam.3 Another example a case of discrimination is Indonesia’s

health services. As we can see on the news, many poor people who cannot get

health care because of their lack of funds, though they have Jamkesda card. Many

1

“Prejudice,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudiceAccessed on

September, 25th

2013 at 17:38 2 “Discrimination,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination Accessed

on September, 4th

2013 at 20:50 3 “Muslim Discriminated Against for Demonstrating Their Faith”,

https://www.amnesty.org/en/news/muslims-discriminated-against-demonstrating-their-faith-2012-

04-23 Accessed on April. 16th

2014 at 19:56

2

reasons issued by the hospital to refuse underprivileged patients. Not a few

patients who eventually dying because the hospital did not want to accept and

give service to them.

Basically, the act of discrimination begin from a prejudice that makes a

person or group making a distinction against other individuals or groups.

Prejudice and discrimination have been widespread in human history, and we

must first clearly distinguish between them. Prejudice refers to opinions or

attitudes held by members of one groups towards another. Gordon W. Allport

defined prejudice as a feeling, favorable or unfavorable, toward a person or thing,

prior to, or not based on, actual experience.4 Anthony Giddens stated a prejudiced

person’s preconceived views are often based on hearsay rather than on direct

evidence, and are resistant to change even in the face of new information.5This

happens because we, humans, are social beings who naturally want to gather with

others who are similar to ourselves.

The lack of understanding and treatment to other people who different

from him or his groups are the main reasons why prejudice could happen. In his

journal, Louis A. Penner explained prejudice can be based on group’s age,

occupation, social-class, region of residence, or dozens of other characteristic.

Among of multitude of different kinds of prejudice, the most common is Ethnic

Prejudice.6 Milton Rokeach, social psychologist, proposed an explanation of

ethnic prejudice based on this fact. According to Rokeach,

4

Gordon W. Allport, The Nature of Prejudice, (Massachusetts: Addison Wesley

Publishing Company, 1979). p. 6. 5Anthony Giddens, Sociology Fourth Edition, (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001), p. 250.

6Louis A. Penner, “Prejudice and Discrimination”, in The Encyclopedia Americana, Vol.

22, International ed., p. 545b.

3

“Members of one ethnic group may dislike members of another group

because they assume that people whose race, religion, language, or

cultures are different from theirs will also hold other beliefs, attitudes, and

values that are different from their own. The basis of ethnic prejudice is

thus not ethnic dissimilarity; it is perceived-belief dissimilarity.”7

If prejudice represents attitudes and opinions, discrimination refers to

actual behavior against another group or individual. In accordance with George A.

Theodorson & Achilles G. Theodorson, discrimination is the unequal treatment of

individuals or groups on the basis of some, usually categorical, attribute such as

race, ethnic, religious, or social-class. The term is used to describe the action of a

dominant majority to a weak minority in a relation, therefore this imply an

immoral and undemocratic behavior.8 Nina Osin and Dina Porat defined;

“Discrimination is prohibited by six of the core international human rights

documents. The vast majority of the world's states have constitutional or

statutory provisions outlawing discrimination. And most philosophical,

political, and legal discussions of discrimination proceed on the premise

that discrimination is morally wrong and, in a wide range of cases, ought

to be legally prohibited.”9

Discrimination is a social issue that frequently appears as a controversial

topic in varied life contexts. It showed a negative attitude toward individuals or

groups (institutional). Louis A, Penner described institutional discrimination

occurs when some large organization (for example, a government, business, or

school) engages in practices that are unfair to member of some group and puts

them at a disadvantage. Individual and institutional discrimination differ in the

following respects. Individual discrimination is carried out by people acting on

7Ibid, 545c.

8 George A. Theodorson and Achilles G. Theodorson, A Modern Dictionary of Sociology

(Scarborough, ON: HarperCollins Publishers, 1979), 115-116. 9 Nina Osin and Dina Porateds, Legislating Against Discrimination: An International

Survey of Anti-Discrimination Norms, (Leiden: MartinusNijhoff, 2005).

4

their own. Institutional discrimination occurs when an institution makes laws or

rules that affect the behavior of large numbers of people.10

Actually, this

discussion does not mean to view further on prejudice and discrimination

concepts by each sociologist figures mentioned above, but to point out what

becomes the intention of this research.

Nowadays, in 20th

century or above, prejudice and discrimination issues

are often used as a general theme in the film industry. There are so many works

which use prejudice and discrimination as a general theme such as Remember The

Titans (2000) which was directed by Boaz Yakin. It shows a flinty antidote to the

virus of racial hatred and bigotry. In a variety of wonderful scenes, this film

shows us how these black and white boys learn to salute the inner greatness of

each other's souls. Another film is The Help (2011). Set in 1960s, The Help tells

story about a local newspaper journalist who wants to make a novel concerning

with black maids life in Jackson, Mississippi. This film lifts racism by showing

prejudice and discrimination against black people.

One of the popular films11

that shows prejudice and discrimination issue as

the main theme is American History X (1998). The film is set in Venice Beach,

County of Los Angeles, California. It reflects a wide range of diverse cultures and

social classes, where prejudice and discrimination exist between white people and

10

Louis A. Penner, “Prejudice and Discrimination”, 545a. 11

In September 2008, Empire magazine named it as the 311th of The 500 Greatest Movie

of All The Time.” http://www.empireonline.com/500/35.asp Accessed on July, 17th ‎ 2013‎at‎‎‎20:50 .

It also nominated in Golden Reel Award (1999) for Best Sound Editing - Music (Foreign &

Domestic) by Richard Ford (music editor), and Golden Satellite Award (1999) for Best Motion

Picture Screenplay – Original by David McKenna. Furthermore, main actor of this film, Edward

Norton, have nominated for Best Actor in Academy Awards (1999), Saturn Award (1999), CFCA

Award (1999), Choltrudis Award (1999), OFCS Award (1999), and Young Artist Award (1999).

He has won this category in Golden Satellite Award (1999), Southeastern Film Critics Association

Awards (1999), and Taormina International Film Festival (1999).

5

colored people. It tells a story about two white colored neo-Nazi brothers: Derek

(Edward Norton) and Danny Vineyard (Edward Furlong). Since his father was

killed by Black men, Derek becomes the leader of D.O.C, a neo-Nazi gang in their

neighborhood. He used to lead some frustrated kids and give them firebrand

speech about the foreigners who stole their freedom and exploiting their country.

Derek is described as a hateful, bigoted, and cruel, but he was always an

intelligent and promising man. He spends for over 3 years in prison after killing

two black teen who try to steal his truck. There, Derek learns a few things about

life. His younger brother, Danny, has been heading down the same track Derek

did. He is a member of D.O.C too. But, after Derek realizes what he had done

were truly wrong, he pulls out Danny out of the gang. In the end of the film,

Danny is killed by a black student at the restroom before he submits his essay.12

From the explanation above, in American History X (1998) film, the

distinction between white and colored people constructed by idealism from few

central figures, Derek and Daniel Vineyard. Derek, who became a head leader of

D.O.C, persuades another gang member to act decisively on colored people.

According to them, colored people are social parasite who ready to exploit their

country, America. In this case, the film represents social structure which has been

established based on the skin color associated to social structure, as stated by

Eduardo Bonilla Silva (Professor of Sociology). Because of the racial categories

that lead to the origin of the racial structure, racial ideology which appears in the

film serves as the basic framework for justifying the dominant race. In society,

12

An essay about the events surrounding Derek’s incarceration after he had done about

Mein Kampf essay, through Danny's essay we see the rest of the story portrayed in the film.

6

racial categories based on skin color have been constructed in relation with

prejudice that white groups have more power than the colored group. This

prejudice is underlying the existence of an act of discrimination. According to

McLemore, the relationship between prejudice and discrimination has a mutual

effect on each other which may strengthen the racial categories and the racial

structures in society. In fact, the writer believes that there is a relation between

prejudice and discrimination issue described in American History X film (1998).

B. Focus of Study

According to the background of the study above, this research focuses on

the topic of prejudice and discrimination issue which is showed in American

History X (1998) film. This discussion is meant to give restriction within the

research, so the substance of this research will not be distracted by any

misconception neither from me nor the readers.

C. Research Question

The writer identifies prejudice and discrimination issue in American

History X (1998) film with the question: How is the issue of prejudice and

discrimination described through the characters? And, how is the relationship

between prejudice and discrimination in American History X film?

D. Significance of the Study

American History X is fiercely disturbing; not only the language in the film

is pervasive but also the film itself exposes brutality. Yet, the film is important to

be studied because it shows the linkage of discrimination. Ethnic, racial or skin

7

color discrimination is the main factor which causes the oppression to happen, in

the film. In addition to the above mentioned factor, the other factor that causes the

oppression is prejudice toward individual or other groups. Prejudice have a

tendency to disregard objective facts, but it is based on minimum facts which are

interpreted subjectively toward individual or other groups from different ethnics,

race and skin color, which allowing the discrimination to happen. Nowadays,

prejudice and discrimination issues remain to be polemics that continuously grow

in social life.

The significance of this research is to understand how prejudice and

discrimination are described. And also, the writer expects this study can improve

the reader’s knowledge about prejudice and discrimination. Moreover, the readers

are expected to get some interesting points about racial issues in American History

X film (1998).

E. Research Methodology

1. Objectives of the Study

Based on the issues discussed in the background of the study, the

purpose of this research is to describe the issues of prejudice and

discrimination and the relationship between prejudice and discrimination

that are shown in American History X (1998) film.

2. Method of Research

In this research, the writer uses the descriptive qualitative method.

Sharan B. Merriam states that qualitative research is an umbrella term

covering an array of interpretive techniques which seek to describe,

8

decode, translate, and otherwise come terms with the meaning, not the

frequency, of certain more or less naturally occurring phenomena in the

social world.13

Neil J. Salkind also mentioned that, in general, qualitative

researchers are interested in studying social processes, how people make

sense and create meaning, and what their lived experiences are like.14

So, by using this method, the writer try to analyze prejudice and

discrimination issue in American History X (1998) film by using character

and characterization in film theory and S. Dale McLemore theory about

prejudice and discrimination.

3. Technique of Data Analysis

In analyzing the data, the writer use descriptive analysis technique

by implementing the following procedures: Gathering the data from

several sources; such as film, books, articles, journals, encyclopedia, and

browsing from the internet, watching the film in detail and intensively,

reading the film script to avoid any misconception about the core of the

film, collecting the data by watching film and reading film script.

Therefore, the writer analyze the data using the writer assessment

to find correlation between the data and the question which try to be

answered in this research, and the last is summing up the correlation will

be described specifically as the conclusion of this research to articulate the

answer of the research question.

13

Sharan B. Merriam. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation.

United States of America: A Wiley Imprint, 2009. p. 13. 14

Neil J. Salkind (Ed), “Qualitative Research”, Encyclopedia of Research Design Volume

3, (Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications, Inc, 2010) p.1159

9

4. Instrument of Research

Based on Buchari Alma, in the qualitative method the researcher is

the primary instrument for data collection and analysis.15 The instrument of

this research is the writer as the researcher to collect the data, to find the

correlation between the data and the research question, and to answer the

research question.

5. Unit of Analysis

American History X (1998) film is the unit of analysis of this

research. American History X is 1998 drama film directed by Tony Kaye

starring Edward Norton and Edward Furlong. It was distributed by New

Line Cinema.

F. Time and Place

This research is conducted in the Faculty of Adab and Humanities, Syarif

Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta. To mention the time of the

research, this research is began in the academic year 2013.

15

Buchari Alma. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis.(Bandung : AlfaBeta.2010)., p.15.

10

CHAPTER II

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

A. Film Theory

Film is one part of the art which is produced by recording real images with

cameras or by creating images through special effect or animation. Advancing

audio and visual aspects, film could be an influential and effective instrument of

universal communication. Present-day, film is a popular provenance of

entertainment. Not only entertainment, but film is also used as a powerful method

for educating and vindicating a historical record.

As mentioned in the previous chapter, Joseph M. Boggs and Dennis W.

Petrie defined film is a unique and powerful art form on a par with painting,

sculpture, music, literature, and drama.16

Film communicates visually and

verbally; visually, through action and gesture; verbally, through dialogue.17

In

point of view, a film can cover the full spectrum from the purely objective to

intensely subjective; in depth it can focus on the surface realities and the purely

sensual, or it can delve into the intellectual and philosophical.18

Film can run the

gamut of feeling from the most fragile, tender, and beautiful to the most brutal,

violent, and repulsive.19

In analyzing a film, a circumspection and precision are necessary for the

researchers in capturing certain elements which are presented in it. Still according

16

Joseph M. Boggs & Dennis W. Petrie., Op. Cit, p.2 17

Ibid. 18

Ibid.,pp.2-3 19

Ibid., p.3

10

11

to Boggs and Petrie, film analysis requires us to respond sensitively to the

simultaneous and continuous interplay of image, sound, and movement on the

screen.20

Like the novel, short story, or play, film has some unique elements such,

theme and focus, conflict, character and characterization, allegory, symbolism,

and irony. However, the writer did not use all the elements of the film in this

research, but only focus on character and characterization.

1. Character and Characterization Theory

Boggs and Petrie claimed that characters are the most human elements

in the film. The characters in a story are believable in the same way that the

story is believable.21

The characters should bring a reality impression within

the film and insist the viewers to believe that what they see in the film is a

reality. Boggs and Petrie also explained. They conform the laws of probability

and necessity (by reflecting externally observable truths about human nature),

they conform to some inner truth (man as we want him to be), or they are

made to seem real by the convincing art of the actor.22

Boggs and Petrie define several techniques of characterizations to

portray the characteristics of each character:

a. Characterization through Appearance

Because most film actors project certain qualities of character the

minute they appear on the screen, characterization in film has a great deal

to do with casting. A major aspect of film characterization is revealed

visually and instantaneously. Although some actors may be versatile

20

Ibid., 21

Ibid.,p.50 22

Ibid.

12

enough to project completely different qualities in different roles, most

actors are not. The minute we see most actors on the screen, we make

certain assumptions about them because of their facial features, dress,

physical build, and mannerisms and the way they move. Our first visual

impression may be proven erroneous as the story progresses, but it is

certainly an important means of establishing character.23

The viewers will directly make assumptions about how character’s

personality or character appearances about their facial features, dress,

physical build, mannerism and the way they move will be shown as long

as the story running in film.

b. Characterization through Dialogue

The dialogue (what they say and how they say it) of the character

in film can reveal the significant detail about themselves. In accordance

with Boggs and Petrie, their true thoughts, attitudes, and emotions can be

revealed in subtle ways through word choice and through the stress, pitch,

and pause patterns of their speech. Actors’ use of grammar, sentence

structure, vocabulary, and particular dialects (if any) reveals a great deal

about their characters’ social and economic level, educational background,

and natural processes.24

c. Characterization through External Action

It must be assumed, of course, that real characters are more than

mere instrument of the plot, that they do what they do for a purpose, out of

23

Ibid. 24

Ibid.,pp.50-52

13

motives that are consistent with their overall personality. Thus, there

should be a clear relationship between a character and his or her actions;

the actions should grow naturally out of the character’s personality. If the

motivation for character’s action is clearly established, the character and

the plot become so closely interwoven that they are impossible to separate,

and evey action that the character takes in some way reflects the quality of

his particular personality. 25

The external action is not only the characters actions which grow

naturally out of the character’s personality in the film, but also the action

that the characters do beyond their motives or their substance purpose in

the film.

d. Characterization through Internal Action

Inner action occurs within characters’ minds and emotions and

consists of secret, unspoken thoughts, daydreams, aspiration, memories,

fears, and fantasies. The most obvious way in which the filmmaker reveals

inner reality is by taking us visually into the character’s mind so that we

see or hear the things that the character imagines, remembers, or thinks

about. This may be achieved through a sustained interior view or through

fleeting glimpses revealed by means of metaphors. In addition to

providing glimpses into the inner action by revealing the sounds and sights

the character imagines he sees and hears, the filmmaker may employ tight

close-ups on an unusually sensitive and expressive face (reaction shots) or

may utilize the musical score for essentially the same purpose.26

25

Ibid.,pp.52-53 26

Ibid.,p.53

14

Through internal actions the characters unspoken thoughts,

daydreams, aspiration, memories, fears, which implied in the sounds and

sights the characters imagines, can reveal the character’s secret about his

or her emotion and minds.

e. Characterization through Reactions of Other Characters

The way other characters view a person often serves as an excellent

means of characterization. Sometimes, a great deal of information about a

character is provided through such means before the character first appears

on the screen.27

Through their dialogue and the way they response the main

character, sometimes the other character have a noteworthy role to define

the main character’s personality.

f. Characterization through Contrast: Dramatic Foils

One of the most effective techniques of characterization is the use

of foils─contrasting characters whose behaviors, attitudes, opinions,

lifestyle, physical appearance, and so on are the opposite of those the main

characters. The effect is similar to that achieved by putting black and

white together─the black appears blacker and the white appears whiter.28

The passage above means that other characters have contrast

characteristics with the main character. Both should affirm the line of the

difference between them.

27

Ibid. 28

Ibid.,p.54

15

g. Characterization through Caricature and Leimotif

In order to etch a character quickly and deeply on our minds and

memories, actors often exaggerate or distort one or more dominant

features or personality traits. This device is called caricature (from

technique used in cartooning).29

A similar means of characterization,

leimotif, is the repetition of single action, phrase, or idea by a character

until it becomes almost a trademark or theme song for that character.

Because it essentially exaggerates and emphasizes (through repetition),

such a device acts very much like caricature.30

In this way, the actor

described with special accents or exaggerated from the usual.

h. Characterization through Choice of Name

The qualities of sound, meaning, or connotation within the name of

a character can help reveal the character personality.

One important method of characterization is the use of names

possessing appropriate qualities of sound, meaning, or connotation. This

technique is known as name typing.31

Another method which mentioned by Boggs and Petrie for

analyzing characters in film is defined into three different types of pairing:

i. Stock characters and Stereotypes

Stock characters are minor characters whose actions are

completely predictable or typical of their job or profession (such as a

bartender in a western). They are in the film simply because the situation

29

Ibid. 30

Ibid.,p.56 31

Ibid., p.57

16

demands their presence. They serve as natural part of the setting, much as

stage properties like a lamp or chair might function in a play.32

Stereotypes, however are character s of somewhat greater

importance to the film. They fit into preconceived patterns of behavior

common to or representative of a large number of people, at least a large

number of fictional people. Examples of stereotypes are the rich playboy,

the western hero’s sidekick, the pompous banker, and the unmarried

aunt.33

j. Static versus Dynamic or Developing Characters

Developing characters are deeply affected by the action of the

plot (internal, external, or both) and undergo some important change in

personality, attitude, or outlook on life as a result of the action of the story.

The change can be of any type but is significant to the total makeup of the

individual undergoing the change. 34

Static characters remain essentially the same throughout the film.

The action does not have an important effect on their lives (as might

generally be the case with the her of an action/adventure film). Or they are

insensitive to the meaning of the action and thus are not capable of growth

or change.35

k. Flat versus Round Characters

Flat characters are two-dimensional, predictable characters who

lack the complexity and unique qualities associated with psychological

32

Ibid.,pp.57-58 33

Ibid.,p.58 34

Ibid. 35

Ibid.,p. 59

17

depth. they often tend to be representative character types rather than real

flesh-and-blood human beings.36

Round characters or three-dimensional characters are not

inherently superior to flat characters. The terms merely imply how

different characters function within the framework of a story.37

In other words, this utilization of three different types of pairings is

used to classify a character and his or her importance and his or her role in

the film into a specific definition of a character which intended to

analyzed.

2. Prejudice and Discrimination Theory

It is mentioned in the previous chapter, prejudice and discrimination is

a complex and a huge problem in social phenomena from the past until this

time. Prejudice and discrimination have been widespread in human history,

and we must first clearly distinguish between them. S. Dale McLemore

explained, firstly, the term of prejudice refers to an attitude or some other

similar internal state or disposition, feeling, or opinion. The term

discrimination in contrast, refers to an overt acting. Secondly, although racial

and ethnic prejudice and discrimination may involves attitudes and actions

that are intended to favor a particular group or its members, these terms refer

to actions directed against certain persons. Thirdly, prejudice usually is

thought to precede, lie behind, or be the cause of discrimination.38

36

Ibid.,p. 60 37

Ibid. 38

S. Dale McLemore, Racial and Ethnic Relations in America; Second Edition, (Newton,

Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc, 1983). p. 108

18

a. Prejudice

Prejudice represents attitudes and opinions. Prejudice refers to

opinions or attitudes held by members of one groups towards another. In

accordance with McLemore, prejudice is an unfavorable attitude toward

people because they are members of a particular racial or ethnic group.39

There are three factors that can affect the prejudice, namely:

1) Cultural Transmission

Cultural transmission is a factor which was influenced by the

cultural environment. People will naturally learn what is already

established in the community. McLemore defined, two aspects of a culture

are particularly closely related to the extent and kind of prejudice that is

found in given society. The first of these has to do with the shared beliefs

that members of one group have about the members of the other groups in

the society. The second has to do with culture’s prescriptions concerning

the degrees of intimacy of “nearness” that one group’s members should

permit or desire from any other group’s members.40

39

Ibid., p.108 40

Ibid.,pp.110-111

19

2) Personality Traits

Personality traits are a factor which related to the frustration-

aggression hypothesis. As mentioned by various scholars in McLemore that

frustration always leads to aggression and aggression is always the result of

frustration. But, this hypothesis got refinement and revised after a number

of studies have been designed, proposed, and tested that aggression could

be caused by things other than frustration.41

Here, McLemore generalized

the argument that all people experience various frustrations in their daily

lives, that these frustrations give rise to hostile feelings, that the hostile

feelings may lead to aggressive behavior, and that the aggression may be

aimed at a substitute target. He explained the frustration-aggression theory

points in a different direction. It assumes that the guilt produced by

scapegoating―the sense that one may have committed an injustice―may

be accompanied by a fear that the injured person will retaliate. The

combination of guilt and fear now becomes a new source of frustration, and

this new source of frustration, like the original source, arouses aggressive

feelings. For example racial minorities have afforded a weak and a

convenient target ─ scapegoats ― for the free-floating aggressions of the

majority. In this way, prejudice serves to assist the majority-group

members to displace (and possibly to “drain off”) their accumulated

feelings without exposing themselves to a high risk of retaliation.42

41

Ibid., p.116 42

Ibid.,pp.117-118

20

3) Group Identity

This factor explained that the members of human groups would be

drawn together by a common interest, they simultaneously become

distinguished from another group. The ethnocentrism automatically

generates prejudice in a group’s member. McLemore said, in this way, the

group’s preference become their preference; its standard, their standard; its

beliefs, their beliefs, and its enemies, their enemies. Prejudice is a

predictable consequence of this natural ethnocentrism.43

b. Discrimination

If prejudice represents attitudes and opinions, discrimination refers to

actual behavior against another group or individual. Discrimination is a social

issue that frequently appears as a controversial topic in varied life contexts. It

showed a negative attitude toward individuals or groups (institutional).

McLemore argues that discrimination is an unfavorable action toward people

because they are members of a particular racial and ethnic group.44

It was

mentioned before that prejudice may lead to discrimination. But, this process

can be reversed. Discrimination by those who are wealthy and powerful may

create other group differences which then foster prejudice. There are three

factors of discrimination (which also are theories of indirect prejudice)

43

Ibid., p.120 44

Ibid., p.108

21

1) Situational Pressure

As well as a number of studies demonstrated that prejudice and

discrimination do not necessarily go together. Discrimination may not

occur when prejudice in present, and it may occur when prejudice is

absent. In either case, a serious objection is raised to the presumption that

prejudice is the cause of discrimination. People may claim to be

unprejudiced but, in fact, discriminate under some conditions; but they

also show that people may claim to be prejudiced and not discriminate.

The specific social pressures arising in particular situations seem, in many

instances, to many outweigh personal prejudice as a cause of

discrimination. Situational pressures theory is focus on behavior rather

than attitudes, but it also emphasizes the current determinants of behavior

rather than those growing out of socialization process. Individuals learn

stereotypes and social distance norms; individual develop personality

needs that predispose them more-or-less toward becoming prejudiced;

individuals respond to situational pressures and behave in discriminatory

ways.45

45

Ibid.,pp.127-129

22

2) Group Gains

This theory of discrimination is based on how groups struggled for

possession of the land; how the fear of another group would take jobs

away. Those two important resources conflicts between groups led to

relatively fixed social arrangements in which the members of the more

powerful groups enjoyed greater privilege and higher social standing than

those in the less powerful group. The members of dominant group have

discriminated systemically against the members of racial and ethnic groups

because the discriminators seem to gain by that.46

3) Institutional

In this case, we could see that the discrimination that occurs in one

institutional setting may carry over into or have side effects on a related

institutional setting. Schools, hospitals, factories, banks, and so on do not

need to be staffed by prejudiced people in order to achieve discriminatory

result. To carry the matter further, a father’s difficult in finding

employment may lead his son to drop out of school to go to work. The son,

too, may encounter the same employment problems as the father. Both the

group-gains theory and the institutional-discrimination theory emphasize

that discrimination has important sources other than individual prejudice.47

46

Ibid., pp.130-135 47

Ibid.,pp.136-137

23

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH FINDING

In this chapter, I analyze prejudice and discrimination issue in American

History X (1998) film. After watching this film carefully and continuously, I

analyze some characters through their dialogues, pictures, and acts that are

relevant with the issue of prejudice and discrimination in the film by using

character and characterization theory. Hereafter, I connect the correlation between

character acts with prejudice and discrimination theory. Finally, I explain the

relationship between prejudice and discrimination issues portrayed in American

History X (1998) film.

A. Characters Identification

The issue of prejudice and discrimination in American History X are

shown through the characters with various ethnics, such as White, Black, Asian,

and Hispanic. In this film, a number of white characters consider that colored

characters or other ethnics are not part of their country, America. They, colored

people, are illegal immigrants who should not be protected by the state.

Character is one of the important elements in a film. Derek and Daniel

Vinyard are the major characters in American History X film. They are two white-

brothers, who join into D.O.C. gang. Derek Vinyard is an intelligent man with a

high courageousness and leadership to runs his gang. He battles through a

purification to help his younger brother and becomes the father figure of the

24

family. Daniel Vinyard is the younger brother of Derek. He lost a father figure in

his life, so he has been heading down the same track Derek did.

Asides from major character, there are some minor characters in American

History X. The householder of Vinyards family, Dennis Vinyard; a firefighter,

was killed on his duty to extinguish hazardous fires that threaten in the black

neighborhood. The other Vineyard families are Doris, their mother, and Davina,

younger sister of Derek. She is a liberal, open-minded, and brainy young woman.

Seth Ryan is a Derek’s close friend, an overweight white man and a member of

D.O.C gang. Derek has a girlfriend, her name is Stacey. She is a member of

D.O.C gang too.

Other minor characters are Dr. Bob Sweeney; a Black principal at Venice

Beach High School, Mr. Murray Rosenberg; a teacher and he had been dating

with Doris, Cameron Alexander; an idealist and prime mover of D.O.C gang,

Lamont; Derek’s best friend in jail, Huge Aryan; a prisoner and leader towards a

small Nazi group in jail, Lawrence; one of black gang member and Little Henry; a

young black student at Venice Beach High School, also one of black gang

member. In addition, numerous other characters are not described clearly, such

members of D.O.C gang and employees of Archie’s Ranch Market.

From all of the characters that mentioned above, some of them will be

focus discussed related to prejudice and discrimination issues whether they are

actors; who perform prejudice and act of discrimination, victims; who become

victims of what the actors have done. The characters who are relatedin prejudice

and discrimination as actorsareDerek Vinyard, Daniel Vinyard, Dennis Vinyard,

25

Seth Ryan, and several of D.O.C gang members. Furthermore, a number of

characters who are related to prejudice and discrimination issues as victims in

American History X (1998) film are Mr. Murray, Lawrence (with his friend), Dr.

Bob Sweeney and some minority group members.48

B. American History X, Prejudice, and Discrimination

American History X (1998) is a film which raises prejudice and

discrimination issues towards White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, and another ethnic.

After analyzing some characters through their dialogues, pictures, and acts that are

relevant with the issue of prejudice and discrimination in the film by using

character and characterization theory, in this part, I will analyze the issues through

theory of prejudice and discrimination by S. Dale McLemore which is divided

into cultural transmission, personality traits, and group identity lead to prejudice,

and situational pressure, group gains, and institutional structure lead to

discrimination.

There are several characters who become actors of prejudice and

discrimination, such as Derek Vinyard, Daniel Vinyard, Dennis Vinyard, Seth

Ryan, and D.O.C gang members. From that mentioned characters, they are

commit to the act prejudiceand discrimination.

Derek Vinyard, the oldest son of Vinyard’s family. Through his

appearances, firstly he described as a simple or naïve person with a neat hair and

slightly longer who is swallowing everything he recently know (Picture 1). At this

48

This refers to some characters who work in Archie’s Ranch Market.

26

time, Derek has a real father figure, Dennis Vinyard, his father. Dennis Vinyard,

is a husband of Doris and a father from his four children. He works in L.A County

fire department. Derek describes him as a decent hard worker man. On his duty to

extinguish hazardous fires in a Compton drug den, Dennis is killed. He gets shoot

after some social parasites (minorities) rob him. He cares about his children

activities and discusses it together. When he is still alive, Derek tells him about

his activity in school and he follows what his father said.

Derek : What do you expect?

A decent hard working Americans like my dad are getting rubbed out by

social parasites.

Picture 1 (01:39:52)

Derek has a younger brother, Daniel Vinyard or Danny. He is a

student of Venice Beach High School. This young bald guy is so infatuated

with Derek. Danny actually seems to be like Derek. As the dialogue that

mentioned, Danny is a talented student same as Derek.

Dr. Bob Sweeney : How are you doing‟?

Daniel : Fine.

Dr. Bob Sweeney : Things at home ok?

Daniel : Yap

Dr. Bob Sweeney : Derek got out this morning, did he not?

Daniel : Yeah, he did.

Dr. Bob Sweeney : He was one of my students you know that right? Honors

English. He was a brilliant student. Like you. But he

hung out with simple-minded fools, also like you…

(00:08:29 – 00:09:02)

27

Danny is a very young and impressionable guy. He is one of a D.O.C

gang member too. When he was a teenager, he lost his father. Derek, as his

first brother, turns into a father figure for Danny. Danny stays on behind his

brother. It is shown in various scenes; when Derek gives a firebrand speech

toward D.O.C members (Picture 4) and then at the basketball court on the

D.O.C versus black gang game (Picture 5).After Derek’s incarceration, Danny

follows his brother foot-steps further. However, in his quite young age, it is

difficult to maintain his thought without any companion. He starts influenced

with rhetoric or propaganda white supremacy, and blinded by them in the

gang.

Picture 2 (00:36:11) Picture 3 (00:17:56)

He thinks that what he has done is right. He feels that he had grown up

and now he is not a 14 years old kid anymore. Danny becomes a heavy

smoker. Later than Derek’s free from prison, Danny wants to impress Derek

with his essay about Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” and his new tattoo which

he got a month ago officially from Cameron. Derek does not want his brother

fall into the same track Derek did. Firstly, Derek just tells Danny to stay at

home and not to join the party, but Danny ignores it. At the end of the film,

28

after he realizes what had he done and taught were wrong, and he tries to

make a new life, but Danny is getting shot and die at a school’s toilet.

From three characters mentioned above, the first aspect that leads

prejudice,cultural transmission, is described.According to McLemore,

Cultural transmission is a factor which was influenced by the cultural

environment. People will naturally learn what is already established in the

community.49

Dennis is a major factor or who should be responsible for the

beginning of prejudice in Vinyard’s family. At first, Derek is very impressed

with his teacher, Sweeney. He is so excited and passionate when Sweeney

gave him an essay exam on Native Son book and learn about black literature.

Dennis : Read the book. Ace the guy‟s test. Just don‟t swallow everything he

feeds you whole. Just because you see it on the news.

Derek : But, like what?

Dennis : All this stuff about making everything equal. It‟s not that simple. Look!

Now, you got this book, Native Son, what happen to the other books in

the course? They are not any good anymore because Mr. Two-Ph.Ds says

they aren‟t?

Derek : (laughing)

Dennis : Are you gonna trade in great books for black books? Does that make

sense? Huh? You gotta question these things, Derek. You gotta look at

the whole picture. We‟re talking about books here. But, I‟m also talking

about my job. I got two black guys on my squad now. Who get their job

over a couple of white guys who actually scored higher on the test. That

makes sense? Huh? Yeah. Sure. Everything equal now. But I got two guys

watching my back or responsible for my life who aren‟t as good as two

others. They go the job because they were black. Not because they were

the best.

Derek : That sucks

Dennis : Yeah! Is that what America is about? No, America is about best men for

the job. You do your best you got the job. You know that. This affirmative

action crap I don‟t know what that‟s about. There‟s some hidden agenda

or something going on. You see what I‟m saying?

49

McLemore, Op. Cit, p.110

29

Derek : Yes, I do. I don‟t know. I didn‟t think about that. This guy though, I

don‟t know, Dr. Sweeney, he comes on like so strong, it‟s hard not to

listen to him. I don‟t know maybe some of what he says is kind of…

Dennis : It‟s bullshit.

Derek : Yeah... Yeah… Maybe...

Dennis : No. no. no. it‟s nigger bullshit. You see that don‟t you?

Derek : Yeah.

Dennis : You gotta watch out for that.

Derek : Yeah! I got what you saying. I will.

Dennis : Good boy I‟m proud of you/

(01:39:33 – 01:42:03)

Firstly, Derek does not have a little bit prejudice about black people.

But, when Dennis tells him that the entire thing Sweeney or Black literature

said is nonsense, it changes not only Derek, but also Danny’s perspective and

mindset about black people or black literature. McLemore explained that the

building blocks of prejudice are contained within the society’s traditions or

culture and are transmitted to children in a natural way as they are exposed to

those traditions in the home and community50

. Things which happened to

Dennis’ job environment and experiences are the cause of prejudice. In this

prejudice aspect Dr. Bob Sweeney is a victim. He is the headmaster of Venice

Beach High School and Derek’s former history teacher. He is well educated

mid-forties African-American with 2 PhDs. He assists for Derek and Danny.

He helps Derek to realize his actions and makes him understand that his

younger brother sets him as a pattern on everything he does. Then, Bob

Sweeney becomes his mentor when Derek in prison and helping him to release

his past. He is a good figure that comes to Derek in his time of need.

50

Ibid.

30

The second aspect that leads prejudice is personality traits. Personality

traits are a factor which related to the frustration-aggression hypothesis.

McLemore argues that all people experience various frustrations in their daily

lives, that these frustrations give rise to hostile feelings, that the hostile

feelings may lead to aggressive behavior, and that the aggression may be

aimed at a substitute target.51

This second aspect is described when Derek’s father is killed by Black

people. Derek is interviewed by a media to respond his father’s death which is

suspected occurs in a black Compton drug den.

Reporter :Look, I know this is though. But, how do you feel right now?

Derek : How do you think I feel? I think is typical.

Reporter : Typical how?

Derek : Well, this country‟s becoming a heaven for criminals so what do you

expect? A decent hard working Americans like my dad are getting rubbed

out by social parasites.

Reporter : Parasites?

Derek : Blacks, browns, yellow, whatever.

Reporter : I don‟t understand. You think maybe your father‟s murder was race-

related?

Derek : Yeah. It‟s race-related. Every problem in this country is race-related.

Not just crime, like immigration, AIDS, welfare. Those are problems of

the Black community, Hispanic community. Asian community, they‟re not

white problems.

Reporter : Aren‟t those really issues the deal more with poverty?

Derek : No. They‟re not products of their environments. Minorities don‟t give

two shits about this country. They come here to exploit it, not to embrace

it. Millions of white Europeans came here and flourished within a

generation. So what the f*** is the matter with these people? They have

to go around shooting at fireman?

Reporter : What does this have to do with the murder of your father?

Derek : Because my father was murdered doing his job! Putting out a fire in a

f***ng nigger neighborhood. He shouldn‟t have given a shit about. He

got shot by a f***ing drug dealer who probably still collects a welfare

check.

(00:14:31 – 01:15:42)

51

Ibid., p.117

31

The dialogue above shows that Derek’s frustration about the death of

his father in a Black Compton drug den brings him to the aggression at a

substitute target. His anger against a perpetrator that likely executed by Black

drug dealer, instead him to other minorities such Asian and Hispanic which

engender a new frustration. In this chase, new frustration becomes a

cornerstone of Derek’s bad opinion aligned with minorities which residing in

the United States and assumes that minorities are the cause of all the problems

that exist in his country.

Then, along with his maturity and joining the gang, Derek becomes a

manly and an intrepid person. Not only his body is muscled but also he has a

shaved head, a thick goatee, and a well-crafted swastika on his left chest

(Picture 4).At this time, he is an important figure in D.O.C, his Neo-Nazi

gang. He becomes a leader of D.O.C and an acquaintance of Cameron

Alexander; the mastermind of D.O.C gang. Cameron does white supremacy

propaganda through article, literature, and videos. He is the biggest distributor

of white power literature in L.A. County. He also promotes white power

bands, writes some reviews, and hates columns. Cameron looks Derek as a

clip to recruit a slew of insecure, frustrated, impressionable kids, and be sick

over the presence of black or Mexican gang near Venice Beach. Derek sticks

to Cameron very close. Start from these two people work in partnership,

D.O.C grows to be one of considerable white gang in there.

32

Picture 4 (00:54:54)

While joining the D.O.C gang, Derek is described as a hateful, bigoted,

and cruel. He turns into an idealist person. He clings with the bedrock of the

gang. He has a good leadership. Even though he uses to lead a neo-Nazi punk

gang with some frustrated kids as the members. In the gang, Derek is a Christ

like or a prophet figure. The members pay some respects to him, and they

follow everything what Derek said. His devotion with the gang is one the

cause of prejudice and discrimination.

Seth : Drink up, Danny, before your brother sees you.

Chris : Holy f***, he‟s here?

Seth : Yeah, he‟s f***ing here. Go pay your respect.

Chris : F*** you, Seth!

…………

Chris : Father Vinyard?

Jason : How‟s it going? I‟m Jason. This is Chris.

We‟re friends with your brother.

Chris : You‟re a f***ing God, man!

…………

(00:57:43 – 00:58:00)

In the film, there are some dialogues from some characters which are

members of the D.O.C gang that associated to the last aspect of prejudice;

Group Identity. This aspect explains that the group preferences will be the

same preferences for members in the group. McLemore said that in this way,

the group’s preference become their preference; its standard, their standard; its

33

beliefs, their beliefs, and its enemies, their enemies. Prejudice is a predictable

consequence of this natural ethnocentrism.52

First, from the dialogue below, Derek who became the leader of the

D.O.C gang gives a speech to the members on the existence of minorities in

their country, America. Derek says that minorities are not the part of America.

They all come to America illegally, with bad purpose, ruin, exploit or take

over everything in the Country. In Venice Beach, there are so many minorities

who take over the jobs which previously occupied by the local community or

white race.

Derek : All right, listen up. We need to open our eyes. There‟s over two million

illegal immigrants bedding down in this state tonight. This state spent

three billion dollars last year on services for those people who had no

right to be here. Three billion dollars. $ 400 million just to lock up

illegal immigrant criminals, who only got into this country because the

INS decided it‟s not worth the effort to screen for convicted felons. Our

government doesn‟t give a shit. Our border policy is a joke, so is

anybody surprised that south of the border they‟re laughing at us?

Laughing at our laws? Every night, thousands of these parasites stream

across the border like some f***ing piñata exploded. Don‟t laugh!

There‟s nothing funny here. This is about your life and mine. It‟s about

decent hard-working Americans falling through the cracks and getting

the shaft because the government cares more about the constitutional

rights of a bunch people who aren‟t even citizens of this country. On the

Statue of Liberty it says “Give me your tired, your hungry, your poor.”

Well it‟s American who are tired and hungry and poor. And I‟m saying

until you take care of that close the f***ing book because we‟re losing.

We‟re losing our right to pursue our destiny. We‟re losing our freedom

so a bunch of f***ing foreigners can come in here and exploit our

country. And this isn‟t something that‟s going on far away. This isn‟t

happening places we can‟t do anything about it. It‟s happening right

here. Right in our neighborhood. Right in that building behind you.

Archie Miller ran that grocery store since we were kids here. Dave

worked there. Mike worked there. He went under, and now some

f***ing Korean owns it who fired these guys and is making a killing

because he hired 40 f***ing border jumpers. I see this shit going on

and I don‟t see anybody doing anything about it. And it f***ing pisses

me off. So look around you, this isn‟t our f***ing neighborhood. It‟s a

battlefield. We‟re on battlefield tonight. Make a decision. Are we going

52

Ibid., p.120

34

to stand on the sidelines? Quietly standing there while our country gets

raped? Are we going to ante up and do something about it?

(00:35:26 – 00:37:48)

All the members of the gang accept Derek’s speech above

immediately. And, they have to believe and pursue all the words Derek said

because they are part of the gang which is led by Derek.

Secondly, this aspect is described by Danny and Seth. Seth Ryan,

Derek’s best friend, is an overweight man, an extremist and a white-

supremacist. In one of some scenes, Seth sings pertaining to his pride become

a white man. He sings out loud and he clenches his left hand while driving his

van (Picture 5). He works as a pest exterminator. He has a big mouth. Derek

describes him as an idiotic. He can’t find the sufficient words to express

himself and his lack of knowledge is reveal by his continual and over use of

swear words.

Seth : Derek, can we please go eat? I‟m f***ing starving here.

Derek : I don‟t give a shit. Go wait in the living room

Doris : I want him out of my house

Derek : I know. Look.

He‟s an idiot. He‟s always been an idiot

(00:32:06 – 00:32:32)

Picture 5 (00:24:43)

35

From the dialogue below, Danny still believe that the half of minorities

is not white race problems. However, because they are members of the same

gang, Seth emphasizes Danny to equalize that they, the minorities, are all the

same; no one of them is good. They will always be parasites or barrier for

white’s welfare.

Seth : Who do you hate Danny?

Danny : I hate anyone that isn‟t a white Protestant.

Seth : Why?

Danny : They‟re a burden to the advancement of the white race.

Some of them are alright I guess...

Seth : None of them are f***ing alright Danny, ok?

They're all a bunch of f***in‟ freeloaders. Remember what Cam said

“we don't know 'em. We don't wanna know „em. They're the f***ing

enemy.” Now what don't you like about them? And say it with some

f***ing convictions!

Danny : I hate the fact that it‟s cool to be black these days.

Seth : Good.

Danny : I hate this hip-pop f***in‟ influence on white-f***in' suburbia.

Seth : Good.

Danny : And I hate Tabitha Soren and all their Zionist MTV f***ing pigs telling

us we should get along. Save us the rhetorical bullshit Hillary Rodham

Clinton cuz it ain'tgonna f***in‟ happen.

Seth : That's some of the best shit I have ever heard come out of your mouth,

damn!!

(00:27:38 – 00:28:24)

And, by the presence of D.O.C, the first aspect of discrimination −

group-gains, is illustrated. D.O.Cis a white supremacist Neo-Nazi gang which

presumes that the arrival of illegal immigrant or minorities will not only break

the ecosystem in their environment but also in their country. Their disgust

against the existence of minorities is wreaked by destructing Archie’s Ranch

Market. They believe that the transition of Archie's Ranch Market ownership

into Korean lead deterioration for local residents which being fired and

replaced with the minorities which later become victims of discrimination.

36

This aspect of discrimination is based on how groups struggled for

possession of the land; how the fear of another group would take jobs away,

said McLemore.53

It is very clearly illustrated The pictures below are

overview of discrimination conducted by D.O.C gang members. After running

into the market, Derek straights to the owner, a Korean, then strangling and

say that what he had done is against the law. At the moment, he throws that

Korean into a rack (Picture 6). Therefore, Derek beats one of employees with

a stick who went into the back room and took a firearm (Picture 7). Several

other gang members persecute a black cashier by pouring cleaning products,

chili, cream, and milk to make her face white (Picture 8) and there is also a

Mexican employee showered with bottles and beans after he gets trampled

(Picture 9). Seth is involved in this case. He destroys all the objects in front of

him and also throws a small-Latin employee into a rack (Picture 10).

Picture 6 (00:38:06) Picture 7 (00:39:01)

Picture 8 (00:39:23) Picture 9 (00:39:14)

53

Ibid.,p.130

37

Picture 10 (00:39:35)

Hereinafter, Derek has to undergo his tough times. He is imprisoned

for three years after killing two black gang members who try to steal his truck.

That is the first illustration of situational pressures aspect that appears in

American History X film. Besides killing two black gang members, another

situational pressures illustrated when Derek evicts Mr. Murray from his house.

According to McLemore, Situational pressures aspect focuses on

behavior rather than attitudes, but it also emphasizes the current determinants

of behavior rather than those growing out of socialization process. And,

individuals learn stereotypes and social distance norms; individual develop

personality needs that predispose them more-or-less toward becoming

prejudiced; individuals respond to situational pressures and behave in

discriminatory ways.54

Lawrence is a victim of this aspect. He is one of black gang members

who involved in Derek’s car robbery. In a basketball game, he engages a

deliberate with Seth and tries to bet a hundred bucks which is switched with a

court bet and he lost the game. When he is stealing Derek’s car, his action is

known by Danny who immediately rushed to inform that incident to Derek.

54

Ibid., p.129

38

Derek, who has assumed that all minorities are social parasites, does not

hesitate to commit acts of discrimination against them. Derek is very annoyed

with the arrival of three black gang members who tried to steal his car in the

garage of the house. Lawrence is shot in the leg by Derek. Lawrence who is

lying in pain and cannot escape then killed sadistically. Derek tells him to sink

his teeth into the sidewalk, at that moment Derek treads his head tightly

(Picture 11). One of Lawrence friend get shot at his right chest (Picture 12).

And, another one successfully escapes from Derek’s anger.

Picture 11 (00:54:15) Picture 12 (00:05:07)

Later, when Vinyard’s family held a dinner, Doris invites her date; Mr.

Murray Rosenberg, to having dinner together. He is a Jewish and also a

teacher in Venice Beach high school. Murray assigns a report to his students;

one of them is Danny, which related to the struggle for the civil right. He

thinks that Danny’s essay about “Mein Kampf” is travesty. He assumes that

Derek is the man behind Danny’s report. He has a terrible experience with

Derek, he involves in a heated discussion about liberalism at a dinner with

Vinyard’s family. On the sidelines of dinner, there is a debate about the

problems of minorities in America. Derek trying really hard to show that his

opinion is the most corrects in this debate. Finally, Derek evicts Murray

because he considers that Murray’s advent will only damage his family with

39

Murray’s positive statements aligned with minorities. The dialogue below

shows Derek’s resentment that led to the eviction of Murray from his home.

Murray : What are you doing, Derek? This is your family.

Derek : Right, my family. So you know what? I don‟t give two shits

about you or anybody else or what you think. You‟re not part of it. And you

never will be.

Murray : That has nothing to do with it!

Derek : Oh, it doesn‟t? You don‟t think I see what you trying to do

here? You think I‟ll sit here and smile while some kike tries to

f**k my mother? It‟s never gonna happen, Murray. F***ing

forget it. Not on my watch. Not while I‟m in this family. I will

f***ing cut your shylock nose off and stick it up your a**

before I let that happen. Coming in here and poisoning my

family‟s dinner with your Jewish, nigger-loving, hippie

b***s***! F**k you! Yeah, walk out! A**hole-f***ing, Cabala

reading.Motherf***er! Get the f**k out of my house! You see

this? That‟s mean not welcome!

(00:47:05 – 00:47:53)

From the two examples above show that Derek does act of

discrimination in certain situations with pressure. And, the victims of his acts

of discrimination are minorities. At this point, we can see clearly that Derek

follows the stereotypes that developed during his joining of D.O.C gang and

also after he considers how awful the minorities, deeply affected him to

discrimination. However, this does not only happen to Derek but also on

Danny. After Danny urinates in the school toilet, he sees Little Henry, one of

Venice Beach high school students and a member of black gang. He hates

Danny. He is slightly described in the film. Along with his two black friends,

he overruns a white student in a toilet who tells the teacher that he is cheating.

Little Henry is not delighted to see Danny's presence, he immediately push

and insult Danny. Danny does not say at all, he just blowing smoke into Little

Henry’s face.

40

Picture13(00:11:43) Picture14 (00:11:45)

The last aspect is Institutional. According to McLemore, both the

group-gains aspect and the institutional-discrimination aspect emphasize that

discrimination has important sources other than individual prejudice. In this

case, we could see that the discrimination that occurs in one institutional

setting may carry over into or have side effects on a related institutional

setting.55

In American History X film, this theory is not illustrated.

During in prison, Derek gets a lot of lessons. He meets Lamont at

laundry who becomes his close friend. Lamont is a funny middle-aged Afro-

American. He is sentenced for six years because of stealing a television and

wounding a policeman’s foot. Beforehand, Derek does not want to say any

words toward Lamont when they are working together to sort out the

underwear at laundry. Lamont notices Derek’s strange attitude and he tells

Derek that in the prison Whiteman is minority.

Lamont : By the way, what you in for?

Derek : …………… (Silence)

Lamont : Probably robbed some old lady, huh?

Derek : …………… (Silence)

Lamont : (Laugh) Ok, I know your kind, right?

Badass peckerwood with an attitude.

Let me tell you something, man.

55

Ibid., p.137

41

You better watch your ass.

Because in the joint, you the nigger, not me.

(01:12:42 – 01:13:17)

Derek meets and enters with some other prisoners who have a

similarity with him; neo-Nazi belief, aside from Lamont. However, after he

joins them, he discovers so many indiscretions contained therein. Then, he

decides to go away from them because of that oddity. Shortly after Derek

leaves them, they put a grudge and retaliate by rape him. Derek becomes so

complicated. Fortunately, Dr. Bob Sweeney comes in his time of need.

Sweeney is a teacher who gets highly pleased by Derek. He tells Derek about

Danny, gives him some books, and asks him a question; “Has anything you‟ve

done made your life better?” (01:29:06 – 01:29:08). With that question,

Derek realizes after what he had done in his life were truly wrong, he begs

Sweeny to help him out of this situation. After a lot of experience which led

him to an alteration, he exchanges his appearance. He grows his hair to show

that he is not the old Derek (Picture 15).

Picture 3 (01:32:52)

From the explanation above about the three aspects of prejudice

according to McLemore appears in American History X (1998) film,cultural

transmission is rising through Dennis Vinyard. Afterwards, a personality trait

42

is reveal through Derek Vinyard. And the last, group identity is portraying

through Derek, Danny, and Seth. Then, about the three aspects of

discrimination, group gains is portraying through D.O.C gang, situational

pressures by Derek and Daniel Vinyard. And institutional is not illustrated in

American History X (1998) film. And, The characters who become victims of

prejudice and discrimination are Mr. Murray Rosenberg, Lawrence, Dr. Bob

Sweeney, Little Henry, Lawrence unknown friend, and Archie’s Ranch

Market staff. From that mentioned characters, some are victims of prejudice

and another are victims of discrimination.

The Actors of

Prejudice and Discrimination

• Derek Vinyard

• Danny Vinyard

• Denis Vinyard

• Seth Ryan

• D.O.C gang members

The Victims of

Prejudice and Discrimination

• Murray Rosenberg

• Lawrence

• Dr. Bob Sweeney

• Little Henry

• Archie's Market Staff

C. The Relation of Prejudice and Discrimination

In this section, I try to explain the relationship between prejudice and

discrimination portrayed in American History X (1998) film. After correlating all

of the explanation above, there are two forms of prejudice and discrimination

relationship.

43

The first is prejudice which does not lead to discrimination. This form is

showed through Denis’ depiction that is presently does prejudice toward Dr. Bob

Sweeney or another black but does not discriminate them. Dennis declares all the

things Sweeney said to Derek are nonsense even Sweeny has two PhDs. Also, he

tells Derek not to swallow everything from Black literature because he assumes

that there is a veiled propaganda to make black people equal with white people.

PREJUDICE DOES LEAD TO DISCRIMINATION

The second form is prejudice that leads to discrimination. This form is

described from several characters such Derek, Danny, Seth, and D.O.C gang

members. At the first, Derek does not have any prejudiced feeling about blacks or

other minorities but all the things are changing after his father tell them about

black. Afterwards, when his father is killed, Derek getting ignite with his emotion

PREJUDICE DOES NOT LEAD TO DISCRIMINATION

44

and makes him to start prejudice toward black people or other minorities. When

he needs a father figure, Cameron comes with his white supremacists propaganda

and he creates Derek to become a leader of D.O.C. That prejudice develops in a

row with socialization process, Derek learns stereotype around him then establish

him to discriminating black or other minorities. This also happens to Danny; who

is always admiring his brother. He follows his brother steps. While Derek joins

the gang, Danny does the same. When he needs a father figure after Derek sent to

prison, he goes deeper because he meets Cameron. So that a cause he forming the

same mindset as Derek. Seth and another D.O.C gang members are becoming

prejudice because they are believe to white supremacist propaganda by Cameron.

They feel overwhelmed since the emergence of new gangs or the comings of

minorities in their neighborhood and lead them to discriminate. This is become

exacerbated by the presence of a sense to struggled for their possession of the

land; how they fear of another group would take jobs away in their neighborhood.

45

CHAPTER IV

CONCLUSIONS

A. Conclusions

American History X is directed by Tony Kaye and it is distributed by New

Line Cinema. It is first released in United States in 1998. The film is abou two

white colored brothers who become involved in the neo-Nazi movement. The film

is set in Venice Beach, County of Los Angeles, California. It reflects a wide range

of diverse cultures and social classes, where prejudice and discrimination exist

between white people and colored people. I analyze the prejudice and

discrimination portrayed and how the relationship between them described

through some characters.

In this research, to understand the film in detail, I did not use all the

elements of the film, but only focus on character and characterization theory by

Joseph M. Boggs and Dennis W. Petrie. They define several techniques of

characterizations to portray the characteristics of each character, such

Characterization through appearance, dialogue, external action, internal action,

reactions of other characters, contrast: dramatic foils, caricature and leimotif,

choice of name. And, they also explain about stock characters and stereotypes,

static versus dynamic or developing characters, flat versus round characters.

Hereafter, the prejudice and discrimination issues are raised by using S.

Dale McLemore prejudice and discrimination theory. He defines prejudice

represents attitudes and opinions. Prejudice refers to opinions or attitudes held by

46

members of one groups towards another. The three aspects that can affect the

prejudice are cultural transmission, personality traits, and group identity. Then, He

also defines that discrimination refers to actual behavior against another group or

individual. The three aspects that can affect discrimination are situational

pressures, group gains, and institutional structure.

From the analysis, I found two major characters and several minor

characters. Derek is an important figure in his gang, D.O.C. Daniel or Danny is

Derek’s brother and he is so infatuated with him by following the same track

Derek did. And, several minor characters are Dennis Vinyard, Seth Ryan, Huge

Aryan, Mr. Murray Rosenberg, Dr. Bob Sweeney, Lawrence, and Little Henry.

Those characters mentioned above, subsequently divided into two

categories. The first category is the actor of prejudice and discrimination; Derek

Vinyard, Daniel Vinyard, Dennis Vinyard, Seth Ryan, And D.O.C gang members.

The second category is victims of prejudice and discrimination; Mr. Murray

Rosenberg, Dr. Bob Sweeney, Lawrence, Little Henry, and Archie’s Ranch

Market staffs.

After that, those characters are correlated with prejudice and

discrimination theory. The first aspect of prejudice is cultural transmission. This

cultural transmission aspect is influenced by the cultural environment and shown

in the film by Vinyard’s family; Dennis, Derek, and Danny. The second aspect is

personality traits and shown by Derek. In accordance with personality traits

aspect, Derek’s frustration about the death of his father brings him to the

aggression at a substitute target. The last of prejudice aspect, group identity is

47

shown through Derek, Danny, and Seth. They have the same preferences because

they are members in D.O.C, white supremacy gang.

Then, the first aspect of discrimination is situational pressures. Several

illustrations of situational pressures aspect in American History X film is Derek

kills two black gang members and evicts Mr. Murray from his house, also Danny

blows smoke into Little Henry’s face. The second aspect is group gains which is

very clearly illustrated D.O.C gang ruins Archie’s Ranch Market. The last aspect

of discrimination is institutional structure, this aspect is showed by Huge Aryan

who feels annoyed or frightened by Derek’s arrival to gang which would

destabilize the existing system with Derek’s behavior and speech.

Finally, I found that there are two forms of prejudice and discrimination

relationship portrayed in American History X (1998) film. The first is prejudice

which does not lead to discrimination. This form is showed through Denis’

depiction that is presently does prejudice toward Dr. Bob Sweeney or another

black but does not discriminate them. The second form is prejudice that leads to

discrimination. This form is described from several characters such Derek, Danny,

Seth, and D.O.C gang members.

48

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books:

Alma, Buchari. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Tesis. Bandung : AlfaBeta.2010.

Allport, Gordon W. The Nature of Prejudice. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley

Publishing Company, 1979.

Ballinger, Claire “TEXT,” in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research

Methods, Vol. 2, 2008 ed.

Boggs, Joseph M. and Dennis W. Petrie.The Art of Waching Film,5th

Ed.California:Mayfield Publishing Company.2000.

Boordwell, David and Kristin Thompson. Film Art: An Introduction, fourth

edition. New York: Mc-Graw Hill, Inc. 1993.

Giddens, Anthony.Sociology Fourth Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.

McLemore, S Dale.Racial and Ethnic Relations in America; Second Edition.

Newton, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 1983.

Merriam, Sharan B. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and

Implementation. United States of America: A Wiley Imprint. 2009.

Osin, Nina and Dina Porat eds.Legislating Against Discrimination: An

International Survey of Anti-Discrimination Norms. Leiden: Martinus

Nijhoff, 2005.

Penner, Louis A. “Prejudice and Discrimination”, in The Encyclopedia

Americana, Vol. 22, International ed.

Salkind, Neil J. (Ed), “Qualitative Research”, Encyclopedia of Research Design

Volume 3, Thousand Oaks, CA, SAGE Publications, Inc. 2010.

Silva, Eduardo Bonila. Racism without racists: color-blind racism and the

persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, Maryland:

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 2006

Theodorson, George A. and Achilles G. Theodorson.A Modern Dictionary of

Sociology. Scarborough: HarperCollins Publishers. 1979.

Websites:

49

amnesty. org, Muslims discriminated against for demonstrating their faith,

(Accessed on April. 16th

2013)<

https://www.amnesty.org/en/news/muslims-discriminated-against-

demonstrating-their-faith-2012-04-23>

empireonline.com, 311th of The 500 Greatest Movie of All The Time, (Accessed

on April. 17th

2013)< http://www.empireonline.com/500/35.asp>

merriam-webster.com, Prejudice, (Accessed on September, 25th

2013)<

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudice>

merriam-webster.com, Discrimination, (Accessed on September, 4th

2013)<http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination>

Film:

American History X. Dir. David McKeena. Perf. Edward Norton, Edward Furlong.

1998.


Recommended