An Introduction to Chromatic Homotopy TheoryPart II : Complex Orientations and the Morava K -Theories
Agnes Beaudry
May 16, 2019
Last Time
(1) Spectra Sp and the stable homotopy category SH.
§ SH is a closed symmetric monoidal triangulated categorywhose objects represent (co)homology theories.
§ SH is obtained from Sp by inverting theπ˚ “ S0
˚-isomorphisms.
(2) Bousfield Localization and E -local spectra SHE
§ SHE is obtained from Sp by inverting the E˚-isomorphisms.§ E -Local spectra Y : E˚pZq “ 0 ùñ rZ ,Y s “ 0§ E -Localization X Ñ LEX :
X
��
// Y E -localoo
E˚-iso //
E -local // LEX
;;
Part II – Complex Orientations and the Morava K -Theories
(1) Complex Orientations
(2) Formal Group Laws
(3) Height
(4) Landweber Exact Functor Theorem
(5) Morava K -Theories
(6) Chromatic Fracture Square
Ring Objects
A homotopy ring spectrum E is a ring object in SH. In particular, E has aunit and a multiplication:
S0 Ñ E , E ^E Ñ E
which satisfy the diagrams of a ring object in SH.
It is homotopy commutative if the following diagram commutes in SH:
E ^Eσ //
""
E ^E
||E
For such E , π˚E is a graded ring. It is graded commutative if E is commutative.
Complex Orientations
A complex orientation for a homotopy ring spectrum E is a class
x “ xE P rE2pCP8q
whose restriction under the map
E2pCP8q Ñ E2pCP1q – E2pS2q – π0E
is the unit.
Eilenberg-MacLane Spectra
Let γ1 Ñ CP8 be the tautological line bundle. Recall that
HZ˚pCP8q – Zrxs
wherex “ xHZ P HZ2pCP8q
is the first Chern class of γ1. This is a complex orientation. In fact,
HZ˚pCP8q – HZ˚rrxss.
Complex K -Theory
Let β P π2K be the Bott class and rγ1 ´ 1s P rK0pCP8q. Then
K˚pCP8q – Zrβ˘1srrrγ1 ´ 1sss
The classx “ xK “ β´1rγ1 ´ 1s P rK2pCP8q
is a complex orientation. In fact,
K˚pCP8q – K˚rrxss.
Complex Cobordism
Note that CP8 – BUp1q. The zero section
CP8 Ñ Thompγ1q “: MUp1q
is a homotopy equivalence and gives a class
x “ xMU P rCP8,MU2s “ ĄMU2pCP8q
which is a complex orientation. In fact,
MU˚pCP8q – MU˚rrxss
Exercise : Chern Classes
For a complex oriented theory E with orientation x “ xE ,
E˚ppCP8qmq – E˚rrx1, . . . , xmss xi P rE2ppCP8qmq
andE˚pBUq – E˚rrc1, c2, . . .ss ci P rE2i pBUq
Hint. Use the Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence.
The ci are the Chern classes of E . The map
E˚pBUq Ñ E˚pBUp1qq – E˚pCP8q
maps c1 to x .
Tensor Product of Line Bundles
CP8 ˆ CP8b // CP8
classifying the tensor product of line bundles gives map
E˚rrxss – E˚pCP8qE˚pbq // E˚pCP8 ˆ CP8q – E˚rrx , yss
E˚pbqpxq “ F px , yq “: x `F y
For
CP8 i // CP8
classifying the C-linear dual of γ1,
E˚piqpxq “: ipxq
In fact,c1p`1 b `2q “ F pc1p`1q, c1p`2qq
Properties of b imply:
(1) px `F yq `F z “ x `F py `F zq
(2) x `F y “ y `F x
(3) x `F 0 “ x , 0`F y “ y .
(4) x `F ipxq “ 0
Formal Group Laws
For R˚ “ R´˚ a graded ring and x , y P pR˚rrx , yssq´2. Define a category
FGLpR˚q
Objects. A formal group law (fgl) over R˚ is a power series
x `F y “ F px , yq P pR˚rrx , yssq´2
satisfying the properties (1)-(4).
Morphisms. A morphism f : F Ñ G of fgls is a power series
f pxq P pxR˚rrxssq´2 such that f px `F yq “ f pxq `G f pyq.
The identity is x .
Base Change. If φ : R˚ Ñ S˚ is a ring homomorphism, applying φ to coeffi-cients gives a functor
φ : FGLpR˚q Ñ FGLpS˚q
§ FHQpx , yq “ x ` y is the additive fgl.
§ FK px , yq “ β´1ppβx ` 1qpβy ` 1q ´ 1q is the multiplicative fgl.
Lazard and Quillen’s Theorem – Algebra
MU carries the universal formal group law:
FMUpx , yq “ÿ
i,j
ai,jxiy j
over the Lazard ring
MU˚ – L – Zraij : i , j ě 0s{I
where I is ideal of relations required for FMU to be a fgl.
MU˚ – Zrx1, x2, x3, . . .s, FMUpx , yq “ x ` y ` x1xy ` . . .
Universality. For a F P FGLpR˚q, there is a homomorphism φ : MU˚ Ñ R˚such that
φFMU “ F .
Quillen’s Theorem – Topology
For E complex oriented with fgl FE , there is a map of homotopy ring spectraf : MU Ñ E such that
pπ˚f qFMU “ FE px , yq
n-Series
For any n P N and formal group law F ,
rnsF pxq “ x `F . . .`F xlooooooomooooooon
n-times
is a morphism rnsF : F Ñ F . This is called the n-series.
For example:
§ FHQpx , yq “ x ` y sornsFHQ pxq “ nx
§ FK px , yq “ β´1ppβx ` 1qpβy ` 1q ´ 1q so
rnsFK pxq “ β´1ppβx ` 1qn ´ 1q
Fix p a prime. Let vn P MU2ppn´1q be the coefficient of xpn
in
rpsFMUpxq “ x `F . . .`F x
looooooomooooooon
p-times
“ px ` . . .` v1xp ` . . .` vnx
pn ` . . . .
vn “
#
p n “ 0
xpn´1 mod pp, x1, . . . , xpn´2q
Height
Let F P FGLpR˚q be classified by φ : MU˚ Ñ R˚. If φpvnq is a unit in R˚,then F has height ď n at p. If in addition φpvi q “ 0 for 0 ď i ă n, then F hasheight “ n.
§ FHQ has height 0:rpsFHQ pxq “ px “ v0x .
§ FK has height ď 1:
rpsFK pxq “ px ` pp. . .q ` βp´1xp .
§ KZ{p “ K ^SZ{p has height “ 1:
rpsFKZ{p pxq “ βp´1xp .
For a ring homomorphism φ : MU˚ Ñ R˚ consider the functor CW` Ñ Ab:
X ÞÑ R˚ bMU˚ĄMU˚pX q.
This is a homology theory provided that Exactness holds.
Landweber Exact Functor Theorem
(1) If for every p and n ě 0,
R˚{pp, v1, . . . , vn´1qvn // R˚{pp, v1, . . . , vn´1q
is injective, thenX ÞÑ R˚ bMU˚ MU˚pX q
is a homology theory.
(2) If E is complex oriented and MU˚ Ñ E˚ satisfies (1), then
E˚pX q – E˚ bMU˚ MU˚pX q.
Landweber Exact Functor Theorem
(1) If for every p and n ě 0,
R˚{pp, v1, . . . , vn´1qvn // R˚{pp, v1, . . . , vn´1q
is injective, thenX ÞÑ R˚ bMU˚ MU˚pX q
is a homology theory.
(2) If E is complex oriented and MU˚ Ñ E˚ is as in (1), then
E˚pX q – E˚ bMU˚ MU˚pX q.
BP and Johnson-Wilson Spectra
§ The Brown-Peterson BP is the spectrum coming from
MU˚ Ñ BP˚ “ π˚MUppq{pxi , i ‰ pk ´ 1q – Zppqrv1, v2, v3, . . .s
In fact, MUppq splits as a wedge of suspensions of BP.
§ The Johnson-Wilson Spectrum Epnq is the spectrum coming from
MU˚ Ñ Epnq˚ “ v´1n BP˚{pvn`1, . . .q – Zppqrv1, . . . , vn´1, v
˘1n s
The theory Epnq has height ď n.
Morava K -Theory
Fix p and n ě 1. The n’th Morava K -theory spectrum is constructed fromMUppq by killing
pp, x1, x2, . . . , xpn´2, xpn , xpn`1 . . .q
and inverting vn “ xpn´1. It satisfies
π˚Kpnq “ Kpnq˚ – Fprv˘1n s
and is a homotopy associative ring spectrum. It is complex oriented and
rpsFKpnq pxq “ vnxpn ` . . .
so FKpnq has height “ n at p.
§ Kp0q » HQ§ Kp1q » KZ{pCp´1 is the Adams Summand
§ Kp8q » HZ{p§ Kp2q is Kp2q
Note. These are not Landweber Exact Theories.
§ A spectrum is a (p-local) finite spectrum if it is isomorphic up to a shiftin SH to (the p-localization) Σ8X for X a finite CW complex.
§ E is a field if E˚X is free over E˚ for any X .
Some Properties of Kpnq
§ Kpnq is a field and any field E is a wedge of suspensions of Kpnq’s.
§ Kpnq˚ has a Kunneth Isomorphism:
Kpnq˚pX ^Y q – Kpnq˚pX q bKpnq˚ Kpnq˚pY q.
§ Kpnq^Kpmq » ˚ if m ‰ n
§ Let 0 ă n ă 8. If X is finite, then
Kpnq˚X “ 0 ùñ Kpn ´ 1q˚X “ 0.
Let C0 “ Cp,0 Ď Sp be the full subcategory of p-local finite spectra and
Cn “ Cp,n “ tX P C0 : Kpn ´ 1q˚X “ 0u
Then, Cn`1 Ď Cn. A spectrum has type n if it is in CnzCn`1.
An isomorphism f : F Ñ G , given by f pxq P xR˚rrxss, is strict if f pxq “ x` . . ..
Let ĄFGLpR˚q have objects formal group laws over R˚ and morphisms strict isos:
ĄFGL : Graded Rings ÝÑ Groupoids
Quillen’s Theorem – Continued
MU˚MU – MU˚rb1, b2, b3, . . .s bi P MU2iMU
wherefMUpxq “ x `
ÿ
iě1
bixi`1
represents the universal strict isomorphism. That is,
φ : MU˚MU Ñ R˚
is a the data:
F ,G P FGLpR˚q f : Fs. iso.
–// G
In particular, ĄFGL is representable:
objpĄFGLpR˚qq – HomRingspMU˚,R˚q
morpĄFGLpR˚qq – HomRingspMU˚MU,R˚q
The Moduli Stack Picture MFGL at p
0 ≤ 1 ≤ 2 ≤ n-1≤ n
…E(n)
K(n)
⟵ En
MďnFGL
{M“nFGL
oo
Mďn´1FGL
OO
Mďn´1FGL X {M“n
FGLoo
OO
Chromatic Fracture Square (Hopkins–Ravenel)
LetLn :“ LKp0q_..._Kpnq
ThenLn » LEpnq » L
v´1n MU
.
There is a natural transformations
LnX Ñ Ln´1X LnX Ñ LKpnqX
In fact, for any X , there is a homotopy pull-back:
LnX //
��
LKpnqX
��Ln´1X // Ln´1LKpnqX
MďnFGL
{M“nFGL
oo
Mďn´1FGL
OO
Mďn´1FGL X {M“n
FGLoo
OO
Thank you!
π˚Sp2q (Illustration by Isaksen)
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 350
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
The E∞-page of the classical Adams spectral sequence
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
h0 h1 h2 h3
c0
Ph1 Ph2
h23
d0 h30h4
h1h4
Pc0
P 2h1
h2h4
c1
P 2h2
g
Pd0
h4c0
h20i
P 2c0
P 3h1 P 3h2
d20
h24
n
h100 h5
h1h5
d1
q
P 3c0
p
P 4h1
h0h2h5
e20
P 4h2
t
h22h5
x
h20h3h5
h1h3h5
h5c0
h3d1
u
P 2h20i
f1
Ph1h5
g2
P 4c0
z
P 5h1
Ph2h5
d30
P 5h2
g2
h23h5
h5d0
w
B1
N
d0l
Ph5c0
e0r
Pu
h70Q′
B2
d0e20
P 5c0
P 6h1
h5c1
C
h3g2
gn
P 6h2
d1g
e0m
x′
d0u
h0h5i
e20g
P 4h20i
P 6c0
P 7h1
h1Q2
B21
d0w
P 7h2
B3
g3
d20l
D3
A′
d0e0r
h25
h5n
E1 + C0
Rh1X1
d20e2
0
h1H1
X2C′
h250 h6
h1h6
h3Q2
q1
P 7c0
k1
B23
Ph5j
gw
P 8h1
r1
B5 + D′2
d0e0m
Q3
X3
C11
d0x′ e0gr
d20u
P 8h2
d2
h22H1
h3A′
h30G21
h0h4x′
h22h6
p′
D′3
h3(E1 + C0)
h3h6
p1
h2Q3
h1h3H1
d1e1
h1W1
π˚Sp2q (Illustration by Isaksen)
π˚Sp2q (Illustration by Isaksen)
Telescope Conjecture (Ravenel)
The first n-rays are detected by LnS0.
Chromatic Splitting Conjecture (Hopkins)
The gluing data for the chromatic layers is simple.