+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ANALSIS RELATIONSHIP OF BEAM COLOUM ON …

ANALSIS RELATIONSHIP OF BEAM COLOUM ON …

Date post: 22-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
1 ANALSIS RELATIONSHIP OF BEAM COLOUM ON REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE BRIDGE WITH LUSAS Achmad Fauzan Z NRP 3107 100 115 Thesis Adviser: Data Iranata, ST, MT, Ph.D Endah Wahyuni, ST, MSc, Ph.D DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya 2011
Transcript

1

ANALSIS RELATIONSHIP OF BEAM COLOUM ON REINFORCEMENT

CONCRETE BRIDGE WITH LUSAS

Achmad Fauzan Z

NRP 3107 100 115

Thesis Adviser:

Data Iranata, ST, MT, Ph.D

Endah Wahyuni, ST, MSc, Ph.D

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning

Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

Surabaya 2011

2

Abstrak

LUSAS is a new software in the civilian world that has not been widely

known by people - people who engaged in the world of Civil Engineering is in this

thesis I will conduct a study of LUSAS. In this thesis I will discuss how to use

LUSAS to analyze a structural model. The model structure should be done in

LUSAS is a relationship structure model beams on the bridge of reinforced

concrete columns. On this bridge there is a different calculation in the relationship

with ISO beams and columns, after which the bridge is in modeling the LUSAS,

there can be seen from the stresses and strains that occur on the bridge. On this

bridge there are diffrence Calculation with a calculation with SNI at Beam and

coloum relationship area where the calculation use Force transfer method

(Sritharan 2005).

3

BAB I

Preliminary

1.1 Latar Belakang Technologi at Civil engginering

world always increas fast, start from

structure bulding system until software for

make an analyses a kinds of structure type.

Study about how to use software for

analyses a Stucture should be do. Not just

for know how to use a software but for fast

analyses use software,

With study about structure analyses

with software would be make easier

analyses on structure so we can get a result

fastly.

In line with the development of

software such as LUSAS, Columns and

beams on the bridge connection it is

necessary to invent a study of the two. In

addition to determine the ability of the beam

column connection on the bridge as well to

know the result of analysis with LUSAS

software which can certainly be applied also

to other models of the structure.

1.2 Formulation of the problem

From the background above the

existing problems are discussed for this

thesis :

• How to make columns and beams

connection model for bridge which can

get load?

• How to analysis columns and beams

connection model for bridge with

LUSAS ?

1.3 Limitation of the problem

• Scope of discussion to be analyzed in

this final analysis only includes the

columns and beams connection with

LUSAS

• Do not discuss the foundation

• Do not discuss the cost

• Do not discuss the implementation

techniques

1.4 Objectives of Thesis

Objectives are achieved in this thesis work

is : 1. On the failure by the structure

of beams and column

connection on bridge are

applied on the reinforced

concrete bridge.

2. Using LUSAS to analyze a

model of the structure beams

and column on bridge

connection.

1.5 Benefit

The benefits of this thesis is able to

use LUSAS to analyze a structure and know

how to design rhe beam and column

connection on the bridge of reinforced

concrete.

BAB II

Review of the Literature

2.1 General

The meaning of the beams and

columns connection on bridge can be seen

in the image below. In the journal, written

by sritharan called tee joint.

Image 2.1. Ilustration Beam and column

connection on bridge

2.2 Force Transfer Method (FTM)

Force Transfer Method (FTM) of

design is preferred ny the design community

as an alternative to designing bridge joints

using the maximum joint shear force. In this

method, the key mechanisms responsible for

the joint force transfer reinforcement is

quantified. The FTM provides constructible

joint reinforcement details because it models

the entire joint force transfer, rather than just

4

isolating the joint shear force as an

independent (Sritharan and Ingham 2003).

2.3 External Strut Force Transfer Model

(EFTM)

The external strut force transfer

model (EFTM) is widely recommended for

use in seismic design of bridge joints

because it considerably reduces the amounts

of reinforcement within the joint panel

region (Sritharan 2005). The adequacy of

the EFTM was invetigated through seismic

testing of a series of larga-scale bridge joints

(Sritharan et al. 1999; 2001.) and the

experimental investigation concluded that : 1. Transfer of power in the connection

area can help by external strut.

2. EFTM provide enough details for

the joint to the reinforced concrete

bridge and a lesser need for

reinforcement in the joint

konserfativ prestressed.

The conclusion has been validated in a

companion paper by developing a model for

the transfer of three joint trials as measured

by using the powef of state and

experimental data (Sritharan 2005).

2.4 Modifined Eksternal Strut Force

Transfer Model

Modification of EFTM served to

joint with reinforcement concrete and

prestressed concrete beam cap.

Given the lack of EFTM, model

modifications to the reinforced concrete

bridge joint is assumed: 1. Armature of the bar column with

sufficient embedment length into

the joint placement and transfer of

good style need the development of

these two mechanisms and splice

clamping mechanism with the

direct help of external joint strut

clamping mechanism.

2. Contribution of the clamping

mechanism and the splice is the

same and each mechanism supports

0,5 Tc, where Tc is the

compressive stress field at the

moment of the column under

conditions of excess.

3. Eksternal joint strut oriented at 45o

to the vertical axis and supports

0,15Tc.

4. Splice mechanism disturbing

development area adjacent to the

cross beam press column, which

will require more reinforcement in

the region of the that has been set

by simple beam theory.

Beam press force of a positive moment in

the column on the press is significantly

higher than the knee joints at tee joints.

Consequently, the reinforcement needed to

splice different mechanisms between the

two types of joint (Sritharan 2005).

2.5 Tee Joints

Image 1 is a modified EFTM, where

in the compression force of the column is

modeled with two ties (Priestley et al.

1996). The voltage conducted to estimate

the additional geometric considerations.

This condition will be met when the column

longitudinal bars extended to joint adjacent

to the tip of the beam with a length of

armature reinforcement that meets (Priestley

1996).

Ia,eff = 0,14db fyc / ��′c (mm,MPa) ..........(1)

Where : db = diameter

fyc = Stress from

column

f’c = Stress beam

joint

Definition of Ia,eff calculated for the

penetration of the voltage along the

reinforcement rods to the joint and to the

type of bonding is expected in the high

pressure joint diagonal struts (Sritharan dan

Ingham 2003).

5

Image 2.2. Modification of the external strut

models for tee joints

Estemasi Stress demands in the tee joint at

estemasi one by one for each transfer

mechanism based on the conditions and

force that occur in each mechanism. 1. Clamping mechanism used external

joint strut:

Based on the demand pressure

on the extermal stirrups and consider

the external strut inclination of 450,

then the horizontal compression

force (Ts) is needed at the point can

be defined by the equation below

(Sritharan 1998, 2005)

Ts ≈ (0.5 − 0.15)Tc tan α1 − 0.15Tc

= (0.35 x 1.15 − 0.15)Tc (α1≈ 49 °

is used)

≈ 0.25Tc

..........(2)

2. Transfer mechanism of splice:

This mechanism assumes that

the 0,5Ts helps transfer of

compressive force the column to the

point D and the rest make a

contribituon to the armature of the

column tie at point D in image 2,

these conditions allow the request to

the end of the reinforcing to be

stable.

Besides taking into account

the voltage transfer mechanism also

takes into accoint the average tensile

stress on the crack, it is defined in

the equation :

0,7 �cr

1 + �500 � … … … . (3)

Where ft = the average tensile stress

in the principal stress directions; fcr =

cracked concrete and closer o,33

��′c (MPa), dan � = average tensile

stress. Of the voltage transfer method

to get this mechanism is also in the

equation to define the additional

demad on stirrups beam crosssection

adjacent to the column press (Tes’),

where : Tes’ = 0,25Tc.

(Sritharan,2005)

By combining and recombining the request

of the clamping mechanisms, demand total

compressive force on the joint area of the

force transfer can be determined (See table).

Tabel 2.1. Comparasion of the voltage at the

joint request of reinforced concrete using the

original and modified external strut force

transfer model.

Of the combined table and equation Tc

(Compressive stress column) can be

obtained equation are used to make the

design of the tee joint, Where Tc = 0.5ASCλα

fyc (Priestley et al. 1996).

2.6 LUSAS LUSAS is one of the world’s system

of structural analysis. LUSAS system using

finite element analysis techniques to provide

accurate solutions for all kinds of problems

of linear, nonlinear, dynamic and thermal.

Two major components of this system is :

• LUSAS Modeller : fully interactive

graphical user to build a model and see

the result of the analysis

Tension demand original model Modified model

External stirrups 0,25Tc over hb/2 0,25Tc over hb

joint stirrups 0,125Tc 0,19Tc

joint spirals 0,25Tc 0,25Tc

beam top bars 0 0,35Tc

beam bottom bars 0,125Tc 0,30Tc

6

• LUSAS Solver : finte element analysis

is a powerful engine to analyze the

problem defined in LUSAS modeller

BAB III

Metodelogi

Diagram alir metodelogi

3.1 Literatur Study

Finding journals relating to the

mothods and ways of modeling method

possible:

• Free Transfer Method (FTM)

• Eksternal Strut Force Transfer

Model (EFTM)

• Modifined Eksternal Strut Force

Transfer Model

3.2 Bridge Model desing

Material specification determines

which will be used for modeling and for

data input to the process LUSAS work.

Specification is determined as the quality of

concrete used and the quality of the

reinforcement and calculate the dimensions

loading and reinforcement on the model

bridge.

3.4 Tee Joint

Before planning the first joint

calculations performed on the model to ger the

size of the model, these calculations include the

following :

• Calculate the length joint :

Ia,eff = 0,14db fyc / ��′c .......... (7)

Dimana : dd = Diameter

fyc = Stress of column bar

• Calculate external joint area :

Aes = 0,125λ0Asc

������ .......... (8)

• Calculate the area of vertical joint

reinforcement:

Ajs = 0,095λ0Asc

������

.......... (9)

• Calculate the ratio of horizontal joint

reinforcement hoops:

ρs = �.� ��� λα ���

��� !" .......... (10)

• Calculate the additonal area of the

beam logitudinal reinforcement

ends:

Abt = 0,175λ0Asc

�����#

..........(11)

• Calculated the additional area

under the beam longitudinal

reinforcement:

Abb = 0,15λ0Asc

�����#

.......... (12)

After all the variables to be drawing in

AutoCAD drawing

Start

Literatul Study

Bridge design

model

Model Drawing

LUSAS analysis

Finish

7

3.5 LUSAS analysis

LUSAS analysis to be done in

several stages, first is drawing the model.

Drawing 3D model consists of two types

namely the type of solid element for

beam or column and line type for

reinforcement. Once the process is

carried drawing mesh, which divides the

model role in the process a small part. In

LUSAS mesh used in the beam volume

mesh with name of element type HX20.

Below is a sample image of the element

Image 3.9 HX20

Element is used for 3D solid element that

can not be defined in 2D.

Element type of line used to define

the reinforcement in the LUSAS element

names are used to define the reinforcement

is BRS2, Below is a sample image of the

element.

Image 3.10 BRS2

Once the mesh is geometric. The

geometric model to be analyzed here is only

required for element line. Function of the

geometric area of reinforcement is to

determine which is defined in LUSAS. After

that procced to define the material.

Will be analyzed in the model used

two types of material that is concrete and

steel. After that procced to determine the

placement and weight of the model.

4.6 Penulangan tee joint

Image 4.11 detail of Tee Joint 1. Area required from external stirrups joint

between joint and cap beams.

Aes = 0,125.ʎ0.Asc.

���

��$

= 0,125.1,4. 66234,37.%��%��

= 11591,01 ''2

Aes per-joint = )*�

%

= ++,-+,�+

%

= 2897,75 mm2

Use 3 stirrup with 4 leght ø19 mm (Aes

pasang = 3400,62 mm2)

2. Reinforcemet horizontal joint rasio

8

ρs = �.� )��ʎ/ 0��

���1"!

Where 234 = 0,3 . dbl. fyc/��′5

= �.� .664�%,�7.+,% .%��

%�� .( �,�.+-.%��/��,)! = 0.19

Aperlu = ρs . b.d

= 0,19.6600.1000= 1.254.000mm2

Use reinforcement ø 19mm with space 200 mm

(Apasang = 1.413.600 mm2).

3. Additional areas of longitudinal

reinforcement in the beam

Abl = 0,175. ʎ0.Asc.

���

��$

= 0,175.1,4. 66234,37.%��%��

= 16227,42 mm2

Abl per-joint = )9:

%

= +6447,%4

%

= 4056,85 mm2

Use reinforcement 9 D 25 mm (Abl pasang =

4415,625 mm2)

4. Additional areas of longitudinal

reinforcement in the beam

Abb = 0,15. ʎ0.Asc.

���

��$

= 0,15.1,4.66234,37. %��%��

= 13909,21 mm2

Abb per-joint = )99

%

= +�-�-,4+

%

= 3477,3 mm2

Use reinforcement 8 D 25 mm (Abb pasang = 3925

mm2)

Information :

ʎ0 : reinforcetment overstrength factor

Asc : The area of reinforcement columns

fyc : Stress melting column longitudinal

reinforcement

fyv : Stress vertical cross bar melting

Image 4.12 The area reinfocement in

columns

fyc : Stress melting column longitudinal

reinforcement

fyv : Stress vertical cross bar melting

4.6.2 Correction of rein

After the tee joint calculation is done there

is a correction in the tee joint

reinforcementm correction made in the

shear reinforcement in the foundation area.

• Tensil reinforcement of joint area :

From tee joint calculation :

Abl pasang = 4415,625 mm2 < As pakai = 4906,25

mm2

Be fix using As pakai = 4906,25 mm2

9

5.1 Drawing model in LUSAS

Drawing in LUSAS at the strat by

determining the coordinates of the points on

the axis (x,y,z) which then connect to the

line and become a model to be analyzed.

• First run LUSAS program there will be a

display like this :

Image 5.1 first run LUSAS

chose “create new model” and klik ok, then

this box will appear :

Image 5.2 new model LUSAS

Enter the file name and the title of the model on

the box, and select a unit which in use. Choose a

unit that can not change again. Because the

modeling using the reference from ISO and not

the conposite template in the startup box is filled

with the standard and the box is filled with

structural user interface. Vertical axis here in use

on the X axis, this determiation can be used

which, in accordance with the wishes of the user.

Then click OK then appear like this worksheet :

Gambar 5.3 worksheet LUSAS

5.1.1 Depiction of the beam and beam

reinforcement

To Illustrate beams and columns in the 3D

model is done by selecting Geometry

Shape wizard

Image 5.4 Shape wizard

Then this box will appear :

Image 5.5 Box Shape wizard

Choose Cuboid at column Solid and Volume at

column Type, colunm Origin used to determine

the coordinates of the strating point of the

picture, here begins the coordinates of the point

10

coordinates (0;0;0). Than click Next, Then this

box will appear :

Image 5.6 Shape wizard dimensi

for reinforcement Geometry Point, so to

describe the coordinates of the point and include

reinforcing those points are connected by lines,

then it will be like this :

Image 5.7 Geometry Beam dan reinforcement

Because there are four beams are the same then

the block is copied four blocks the result will be

like this:

Image 5.8 Geometry Beam dan reinforcement

after copies

5.2 Mesh

Mesh is a divison of the model to the elements –

a smaller element.

5.2.1 Mesh at beams and column

For the mesh in the beam and column volume

mesh type.

Image 5.10 mesh Volume

Element code used is the HX20, because the

number of nodes in the model beams and

columns of more than 4 nodes. Once the mesh

the result will look like this :

Image 5.11 Mesh beam and column

5.2.2 Mesh pada tulangan

Mesh in the same way with mesh reinforcement

in beams and columns using only the type of

mesh on the Line, as reinforcement in the model

is defined by line, box for mesh line like this :

11

Image 5.12 Box mesh Line

To define the 3-dimensional

reinforcement within the meaning of the name of

the element which in use is BRS2.

5.3 Attributes

5.3.1 Entering the size of reinforcement

In this section the size of the reinforcement is

determined by clicking Line Geometric

Attributes, and this box will appear:

Image 5.13 Geometric Line

In the column select Element type "bar", then

input-sectional area of reinforcement in the

column "Cross-sectional area (A)"

5.3.2 Defining the type of material

The material used in the model of the

bridge made the same on all parts, the use of

concrete with f'c = 35 MPa and reinforced with

fy = 400 MPa.

To define the material select Material

Attributes Material Library button on the

toolbar

Gambar 5.14 Material Library

Then this box will appear :

Image 5.15 Material Library Concrete

Choose Concrete Material, pada kolom

Grade Select Ungrade, and input units Units

that will be used. Because the use of concrete f'c

= 35Mpa, the value of young modulus calculated

by:

E = 4700.��′5

12

= 4700.�35

= 27805,57 Mpa = 27,8 x 106 KN/m

After clicking OK, select all the parts on

the model and then drag the material that has

been undefined to the worksheet.

As for the reinforcement material used

Mild Steel

5.3.3 Supports

Supports in LUSAS with placement.

LUSAS determination on the placement is more

flexible because we can determine the direction

of rotation and displacement of the placement.

Supports used in the modeling here there are two

kinds:

1. joints

2. clip

Support for the joint type of

displacement on the axis X, Y, Z in the key but

still no rotation. As for the type of clamp,

rotation and displacement in the key of all.

Support kinds of joints used in the node and the

line for beams and columns, the following

picture box Supports joint and clamp type :

Gambar 5.16 Supports Joints

Gambar 5.17 Supports Clip

Choose Attributes Supports, Enter the

direction of displacement and rotation of the

placement After that drag on the elemet a given

placement. The result will be like this:

Gambar 5.18 Model with Supports

5.3.4 Loading

In this section the load acting on the structure

defined. On the toolbar select the Attributes

Loading, then this box will appear:

13

Gambar 5.19 Loading

Expenses are defined in this section is called the

dead load on the body force and load LUSAS

LUSAS live in called the Global Distributed.

After undefined drag the dead weight load on all

the elements strukutr and live load on the plate

only. After all expenses are defined and the drag

on parts of the structure element, the result will

be like this:

Gambar 5.20 Model with Load

5.4 Running and result of LUSAS

Running on LUSAS done by clicking this icon:

The following is the result after the Running:

Image 5.21 Beam Stress

From Image 5.21 it can be seen the

concrete contours of stress, the value of the

contour diagram was made with colors,

Great value is automatically created by

LUSAS.

Here is a concrete value of voltage at

three different points on the bridge

longitudinal direction (Z coordinates):

Tabel 5.1 Beam Stress

Node

Koordinat

(Z)

Tegangan

(Mpa)

124 0 4,29E+04

514 9,81 1,62E+05

519 11,96 2,41E+05

BAB VI

NonLinier LUSAS Analysis

To get the maximum load that can be

borne by the structure of nonlinear analysis

is necessary. Nonlinear analysis using

LUSAS done in several steps as follows:

Click icon loadcase ( ) Click right,

than choose Controls than Nonlinear and

Transient

Gambar 6.1 Nonlinier Analysis

14

6.1 Graph the results of nonlinear analysis on

the beam:

05

1015202530354045

Tega

nga

n T

ek

an

(M

pa

)

Regangan

Regangan vs Tegangan Tekan (Mpa) pada beton

Image 6.3 Graph of Strain vs. stress

relationship (MPa) in the press area of

concrete

00,5

11,5

22,5

33,5

44,5

Tega

nga

n T

ari

k (M

pa

)

Regangan

Regangan vs Tegangan Tarik (Mpa) pada beton

Image 6.4 Graph of Strain vs. stress relationship

(MPa) on the concrete tensile

0102030405060708090

0

9,8

2E

-09

1,0

7E

-08

1,2

0E

-08

1,3

2E

-08

1,4

4E

-08

1,5

6E

-08

1,7

0E

-08

1,8

2E

-08

1,9

6E

-08

2,1

1E

-08

2,2

4E

-08

2,3

4E

-08

2,4

6E

-08

2,5

9E

-08

2,6

2E

-08

2,6

3E

-08

Tega

nga

n (M

pa

)

Regangan

Regangan vs Tegangan (Mpa) Tulangan

Image 6.5 Graph showing the relationship

Rengangan vs stress (Mpa) on Reinforcement

Of the three charts above can be seen

the extent to which the performance of this

structure, in Figure 6.3 shows the

breakdown in the press area of concrete that

collapsed when stress reaches 30 Mpa, nor

in the figure 6.4 and 6.5 which shows the

collapse of the concrete and the tensile

reinforcement..

6.2 Crack on structure

By nonlinear analysis using LUSAS can be

seen also the location of cracks that occur in

the structure, the following is a picture

cracks during initial loading and when the

structure collapsed:

Image 6.6 Cracks in the structure of early

Image 6.7 Cracks at the collapsed structure

In Image 6.5 can be seen cracking

due to initial loading that occurs in the

connections between beams and columns,

while in the beam there are only a few

cracks, it can be seen with a red mark on the

beam column connections and relationships

in the middle of the beam span. For cracks

that occur when the structure collapsed can

be seen in Figure 6.6. this occurs when the

concrete has a voltage of 25 MPa, when

compared with the cracks on initial loading,

cracks that occur when the structure

collapsed many have additional cracks on

the beam while at the junction between the

beam column connection occurred a little

additional cracking.


Recommended