+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Analyse locale de l'essai de force bloquée - MINES...

Analyse locale de l'essai de force bloquée - MINES...

Date post: 16-Sep-2018
Category:
Upload: doanh
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
59
Laurent DANIEL GeePs, UMR CNRS 8507, CentraleSupélec, Univ. Paris-Sud, Univ. Paris-Saclay, Sorbonne Univ. and UPMC Univ., 11 rue Joliot-Curie - 91192 Gif sur Yvette Cedex - France [email protected] Analyse locale de l'essai de force bloquée sur les céramiques piézoélectriques
Transcript

Laurent DANIEL

GeePs, UMR CNRS 8507, CentraleSupélec, Univ. Paris-Sud, Univ. Paris-Saclay,Sorbonne Univ. and UPMC Univ.,11 rue Joliot-Curie - 91192 Gif sur Yvette Cedex - France

[email protected]

Analyse locale de l'essai de force bloquée sur les céramiques piézoélectriques

• Electro-mechanical conversion

– Direct piezoelectric effect : mechanical -> electric

– Inverse piezoelectric effect : electric -> mechanical

Piezoelectricity

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 2

F

+

–F+

+

–+

Applications of piezoelectricity

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 3

Equations of piezoelectricity• Coupled – linear – constitutive equations

• Voigt notation

• Longitudinal mode with axial stress

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 4

P

Outline

• Blocking force experiment• Ferroelectric behaviour• Synchrotron diffraction on piezoelectric ceramics• In situ blocking force experiment• A piezoelectric test ?• Conclusion

L. Daniel 5Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Outline

• Blocking force experiment• Ferroelectric behaviour• Synchrotron diffraction on piezoelectric ceramics• In situ blocking force experiment• A piezoelectric test ?• Conclusion

L. Daniel 6Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Blocking force experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 7

• A standard test for piezoelectric actuators» Performed on a poled piezoelectric ceramic

• A standard test for piezoelectric actuators» Piezoelectric strain generated by an applied electric field

Blocking force experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 8

* Stress free strain (d33 E)

• A standard test for piezoelectric actuators» Suppression of the piezoelectric strain

by application of a compressive stress

Blocking force experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 9

* Stress free strain (d33 E)

* Blocking stress (d33 E Y)

Determination of d33 and Y

Blocking force experiment• Definition of actuators operating configurations

L. Daniel 10

[Webber et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2010]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Outline

• Blocking force experiment• Ferroelectric behaviour• Synchrotron diffraction on piezoelectric ceramics• In situ blocking force experiment• A piezoelectric test ?• Conclusion

L. Daniel 11Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Ferroelectric behaviour• Origins of ferroelectric behaviour

L. Daniel 12

T > Tc

T < Tc

[Ferroelectric domains in tetragonal PZT, courtesy of D.A. Hall]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Ferroelectric behaviour

L. Daniel 13

,E

• Piezoelectric effect(« intrinsic »)

• Domain switching(« extrinsic »)

E

+ role of internal stresses

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Outline

• Blocking force experiment• Ferroelectric behaviour• Synchrotron diffraction on piezoelectric ceramics• In situ blocking force experiment• A piezoelectric test ?• Conclusion

L. Daniel 14Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 15

• In situ analysis using high energy x-ray diffraction• PZT 51-49 (tetragonal), λ = 0.1515 Å

[ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 16

2 dhkl sin θhkl = nλ

[Svitlyk et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2013]

[Diamond, I15-EE8699, 2013]Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction• Polycrystals

– Different crystallographic orientations• Diffraction rings

– Radius : particular plane {hkl}– Angular position :

particular crystallographic orientation

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 17

2 dhkl sin θhkl = nλ

E

Diffraction profiles• Typical diffraction profiles

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 18

• Analysis of single (111) and double peaks (200,110)

Diffraction profiles

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 19

Spontaneous polarisation strain : o = 2(c-a)/(c+2a) ≈ 1.6%

Outline

• Blocking force experiment• Ferroelectric behaviour• Synchrotron diffraction on piezoelectric ceramics• In situ blocking force experiment• A piezoelectric test ?• Conclusion

L. Daniel 20Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

In situ BF experiment• External loading sequence

– (re-)poling (electric field)– application of a static electric field– application of a progressive uniaxial compression

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 21

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

In situ BF experiment• Evolution of {111} lattice spacing

(piezoelectricity + internal stresses)

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 22

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

• Evolution of domain orientations (002): • Multiple of random distribution (mrd)

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 23

[Jones et al., J. Appl. Phys., 2005]

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

• Evolution of domain orientations (101): • Multiple of random distribution (mrd)

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 24

[Jones et al., J. Appl. Phys., 2005]

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

• In situ blocking stress curves (ψ=0, different E levels)

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel 25

Approximately parallel lines (fixed ψ) Slope depends on crystalline orientation Non-uniform blocking stress (orientation dependent), up to 20% var. (fixed E)

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

P

• In situ blocking stress curves (E=2.5 kV/mm, different ψ)

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel 26Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

ψ-dependent (contraction for ψ=0, expansion for ψ=90o) Stress does not “cancel” the effect of electric field

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

In situ BF experiment• Identification of local coefficients

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 27

Very high level of crystalline anisotropy[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Apparent Young modulusApparent longitudinal

piezoelectric coefficient

Outline

• Blocking force experiment• Ferroelectric behaviour• Synchrotron diffraction on piezoelectric ceramics• In situ blocking force experiment• A piezoelectric test ?• Conclusion

L. Daniel 28Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

A piezoelectric test ?• Non linearities

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 29

Linear fitting not fully satisfactory (200)[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Blocking force Blocking force slope

A piezoelectric test ?• Domain switching during blocking force test (non 180o, ψ=0)

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 30

Moderate amount of domain switching (5%vol. for ψ=0, 2.5 kV/mm) Enough to generate significant strain (o = 1.6%)

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

A piezoelectric test ?• Correlation between strain and mrd (vol. fraction of domains)

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 31

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

First poling (all ψ)

A piezoelectric test ?• Correlation between strain and mrd (vol. fraction of domains)

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 32

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

All measurements (all ψ)

A piezoelectric test ?• Correlation between strain and mrd (vol. fraction of domains)

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 33

{200} = 4 10-4

{110} = 8 10-4

{110} = 8 10-4

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Domain switching isthe dominant factor

Intrinsic Piezoelectricity isalmost negligible

A piezoelectric test ?• Irreversibility of the experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 34

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

A piezoelectric test ?

• Phase transformation

L. Daniel 35Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

P

The application of stress can induce phase transformation Appearance of a rhombohedral phase

Conclusion• The blocking force test is a complex experiment

No “cancellation” of the effect of electric field by stress Heterogeneous state from the beginning (residual stresses) Non-purely piezoelectric and nonlinear elastic test (domain switching)

• No local information can be extracted from the macroscopic piezoelectric interpretation

• In-situ synchrotron experiment can provide local information Local piezoelectric coefficients, local elastic properties Domain switching process Level of internal stresses

Need for advanced micro-mechanical analysis tools Highly material dependent

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 36

L. Daniel1,2, D.A. Hall1, J. Koruza3, K.G. Webber3, A. King4,5, P.J. Withers1, J. Appl. Phys., 117, 174104 (2015)

1 School of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK2 GeePs (UMR CNRS 8507, CentraleSupélec, Univ. Paris-Sud, Univ. Paris-Saclay, UPMC, France3 Institute of Materials Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany4 European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), 38043 Grenoble, France5 Synchrotron SOLEIL, BP 48, 91192 Gif sur Yvette cedex, France

[email protected]

Acknowledgement

In situ BF experiment• Definition of local strain (R refers to the reference state Ri just after repoling)

• {111} = (d111-dR111) / dR

111

• {200} = (d200-dR200) / dR

200 with d200 = (mrd{002} d002 + (3-mrd{002})d200)/3

• {110} = (d110-dR110) / dR

110 with d110 = (mrd{101} d101 + (3-mrd{101})d110)/3

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 38

• A uniaxial experiment ?

Blocking force experiment

L. Daniel 39Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• A uniaxial experiment ?

Blocking force experiment

L. Daniel 40Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Blocking force experiment• A uniaxial experiment ?

L. Daniel 41Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

Uniaxial stress does not “cancel” the effect of electric field Polycrystalline materials: what happens at a local scale ?

Diffraction profiles• Characterisation in the unpoled state

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 42

Diffraction profiles• Characterisation in the unpoled state

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 43

Diffraction profiles• Characterisation in the unpoled state

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 44

Unpoled state

d110(ψ) = 2.7491 ± 0.0003 Åd101(ψ) = 2.7176 ± 0.0003 Å

d111(ψ) = 2.2361 ± 0.0004 Å

d002(ψ) = 1.9686 ± 0.0003 Åd200(ψ) = 1.9218 ± 0.0003 Å

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 45

E = 0 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 46

E = 1 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 47

E = 2 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 48

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

E = 3 kV/mm

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 49

E = 4 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 50

E = 0 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 51

E = 1 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 52

E = 2 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 53

E = 3 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Diffraction profiles under electric field (first poling)

Synchrotron x-ray diffraction

L. Daniel 54

E = 4 kV/mm

[PZT51-49,ESRF, ID11-MA1727, 2013]

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

• Poled state– Heterogeneous strain– E = 0, = 0

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 55

• Electric field– E = 2.5 kV/mm, = 0

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 56

• Compressive stress– E = 2.5 kV/mm– = -30 MPa

In situ BF experiment

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 57

Conclusion• Contribution of synchrotron diffraction in materials science

(smart materials, surface vs bulk)• A tool for the validation of micro-mechanical tools• Prediction of the impact on lifetime performance, fatigue, …• Applicability to ferroics in general (domain microstructures)

L. Daniel 58

E

Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016

L. Daniel Rencontres Franciliennes de Mécanique 2016 59


Recommended