Analysis of statistics 2014
January 2015
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Table of Contents Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2014 .............................................................................................. 4
A. Number of new applications ...................................................................................................... 4 B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications .................................................... 4 C. Processing of applications .......................................................................................................... 4
1. Pre-allocation .......................................................................................................................... 4 2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions .................................................................................... 4 3. Communicated applications ................................................................................................... 5 4. Judgments ............................................................................................................................... 5 5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ............................................. 5
D. Priority policy ............................................................................................................................. 5
General information ............................................................................................................................... 6 Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ................................................................ 7 Processing of applications ................................................................................................................ 9
Country-specific information ................................................................................................................ 14 Albania ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Andorra ........................................................................................................................................... 15 Armenia .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Austria ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Azerbaijan ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Belgium ........................................................................................................................................... 19 Bosnia and Herzegovina.................................................................................................................. 20 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................................................... 21 Croatia ............................................................................................................................................. 22 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................. 23 Czech Republic ................................................................................................................................ 24 Denmark ......................................................................................................................................... 25 Estonia ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Finland ............................................................................................................................................ 27 France ............................................................................................................................................. 28 Georgia ............................................................................................................................................ 29 Germany ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Greece ............................................................................................................................................. 31 Hungary ........................................................................................................................................... 32 Iceland ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Ireland ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Italy ................................................................................................................................................. 35 Latvia ............................................................................................................................................... 36 Liechtenstein ................................................................................................................................... 37 Lithuania ......................................................................................................................................... 38 Luxembourg .................................................................................................................................... 39 Malta ............................................................................................................................................... 40
2/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Republic of Moldova ....................................................................................................................... 41 Monaco ........................................................................................................................................... 42 Montenegro .................................................................................................................................... 43 Netherlands .................................................................................................................................... 44 Norway ............................................................................................................................................ 45 Poland ............................................................................................................................................. 46 Portugal ........................................................................................................................................... 47 Romania .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Russian Federation ......................................................................................................................... 49 San Marino ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Serbia .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Slovakia ........................................................................................................................................... 52 Slovenia ........................................................................................................................................... 53 Spain ............................................................................................................................................... 54 Sweden ........................................................................................................................................... 55 Switzerland ..................................................................................................................................... 56 “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” .............................................................................. 57 Turkey ............................................................................................................................................. 58 Ukraine ............................................................................................................................................ 59 United Kingdom .............................................................................................................................. 60
3/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2014 The Court’s statistics for 2014 disclose some significant differences when compared with previous years and notably a lower number of incoming cases allocated to a judicial formation. This is partly the result of a new approach to Rule 47 of the Rules of Court, which determines what applicants are required to do for their application to be allocated for judicial decision. However, there is also an indication of a falling off in demand with a lower number of cases coming into the system. This has helped the Court to reduce the stock of pending cases since the number of applications disposed of exceeds the volume of incoming cases.
As the backlog of inadmissible cases is progressively eliminated so the spectacular increases of recent years are no longer achievable. As the Court focuses on other categories of cases, productivity will tend to remain more stable, with fluctuations depending on when large groups of cases are processed and adjudicated.
A. Number of new applications In 2014 56,250 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall decrease of 15% compared with 2013 (65,800). 43,450 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (a decrease of 16% in relation to 2013). 12,800 were identified as probable Chamber or Committee1 cases (a decrease of 11%). It is the first time since 2003 that the number of allocated cases has decreased.
B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications 86,063 applications were disposed of judicially, a decrease of 8% in relation to 2013 (93,401). The number of cases disposed of therefore exceeded those allocated by approximately 29,800 (i.e. a monthly surplus of almost 2,500). As a result, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court decreased over the year, by 30% from 99,900 to 69,900.
C. Processing of applications
1. Pre-allocation
As at 31 December 2014 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 19,050, a decrease of 13% in relation to the same date the previous year (21,950). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 2014 was 25,100, an increase of 84%. Half of these files were disposed of under Rule 47.
2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions
In 2014 83,675 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a Committee or a Chamber, a 7% decrease compared with 2013 (89,740). The Single-Judge formation decided 78,660 cases in 2014, a decrease of 2% compared with 2013 (80,583). The number of applications struck out, in a decision or a judgment, following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration, increased by 16% in 2014 (2,198 compared to 1,890 in 2013). Friendly settlements (1,696) increased by 15% (1,481 in 2013) and unilateral declarations by 23% (502 compared to 409 in 2013).
1 Committee competence provided for in Article 28 § 1 b) of the Convention.
4/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
3. Communicated applications
Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the respondent Government. In 2014 7,897 applications were communicated (roughly equivalent to 2013 when 7,931 applications were communicated).
4. Judgments
Judgments were delivered in respect of 2,388 applications (compared with 3,661 in 2013 – a decrease of 35%). A significant proportion of these applications were joined with the result that the number of judgments actually delivered was 891, a decrease of 3%. 209 judgments (in respect of 1,410 applications) were adopted by a three-judge Committee formation. These judgments accounted for 59% of the applications decided by a judgment (75% in 2013).
5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)
The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,929) increased by 20% compared with 2013 (1,608). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 216 cases (an increase of 100% compared with 108 in 2013) and dismissed them in 783 cases (4% less than the 818 in 2013). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court. The increase in the number of requests granted can be explained by 110 cases linked to the conflict in Ukraine.
D. Priority policy 2 The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases, namely the cases falling within the top three categories (“priority applications”). At 31 December 2014 there were 7,386 applications in these categories.
The number of priority applications dealt with at different stages of the procedure in 2014 increased by 32% compared to 2013. 34% more priority applications were communicated to the respondent Governments in comparison with 2013. The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee increased by 36%. The number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration rose from 247 in 2013 to 326 in 2014. The number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment increased by 21% in 2014.
2 An explanation of the Court’s priority policy can be found on the Court’s internet site http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Priority_policy_ENG.pdf
5/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
General information
Table 1 General statistical information
56250 65800 -15%
2014 2013 +/-
7897 7931 0%
2014 2013 +/-
86063 93401 -8%
2388 3661 -35%
83675 89740 -7%
31/12/2014 1/1/2014 +/-
69900 99900 -30%
29650 39000 -24%
32050 34400 -7%
8200 26500 -69%
31/12/2014 1/1/2014 +/-
19050 21950 -13%
2014 2013 +/-
25100 13650 84%
- by judgment delivered
1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation 2014 2013 +/-[round figures (50)]
Applications allocated
2. Interim procedural events
Applications communicated to respondent Government
3. Applications decided
By decision or judgment
5. Pre-judicial applications [round figures (50)]
Applications at a pre-judicial stage
Applications disposed of administratively
- by decision (inadmissible or struck out)
4. Pending applications [round figures (50)]
Applications pending before a judicial formation
- Chamber (7 judges)
- Committee (3 judges)
- Single-Judge formation
6/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation3
Chart 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year
Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation
3 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 2002 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage.
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
1050013800
28200 2720032500
3540039200
41600
49700
5700061100
64300 64900 65800
56300
15900 1980029400
38500
5000056800
66500
79400
97300
119300
139650151600
128100
99900
69900
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
7/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Chart 3 High case-count States (more than 1,700 applications pending before a judicial formation)
Chart 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation4
4 The “Pending Government action” category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying the pilot procedure.
Ukraine1365019,5%
Italy1010014,4%
Russia1000014,3%
Turkey950013,6%
Romania34004,9%
Serbia25003,6%
Georgia23003,3%
Hungary18502,6%
Poland18002,6%
Slovenia17002,4%
remaining 37 States1310018,7%
Total number of pending applications: 69,900
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)831711,9%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)4320861,8%
Communicated1473621,1%
Pending Government action31304,5%
Admissible533
0,8%
Total applications69,900
8/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Chart 5 The Court’s total caseload by priority category
Processing of applications
Chart 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications
Cat. I795
1,1%
Cat. II374
0,5%
Cat. III64059,2%
Cat. IV1863026,6%
Cat. V3539550,6%
Cat. VI-VII832511,9%
Total applications69,900
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Applications
judgment delivered 757 934 889 736 816 1208 1719 1734 1880 2393 2607 1511 1678 3661 2388
Applicationscommunicated 1463 1573 1686 1717 2447 2956 3232 3456 4416 6203 6674 5360 5236 7931 7897
Applicationsinadmissibleor struck out
6779 8992 17865 17272 20350 27612 28160 27059 30163 33067 38575 50677 86201 89739 83675
9/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Chart 7 Number of judgments since 2000
Chart 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed from 2011 to 2014
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
695
888 844
703 718
1105
15601503
15431625
1499
11571093
916891
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2011 2012 2013 2014
1342
1563
1303
1742
573
921771
1051
412546 517
623communicated
decision
judgment
10/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population
The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 824 million inhabitants on 1 January 2014. The average number of applications allocated per 10,000 inhabitants was 0.68 in 2014.
State
2011 2012 2013 2014 1.1.2011 1.1.2012 1.1.2013 1.1.2014 2011 2012 2013 2014
Albania 84 111 106 83 2832 3195 2899 2896 0,30 0,35 0,37 0,29Andorra 8 6 2 5 85 85 76 76 0,94 0,71 0,26 0,66Armenia 173 238 196 154 3263 3274 3027 3017 0,53 0,73 0,65 0,51Austria 387 377 437 315 8404 8443 8452 8508 0,46 0,45 0,52 0,37Azerbaijan 501 342 324 403 9111 9235 9356 9477 0,55 0,37 0,35 0,43Belgium 251 268 270 159 11001 11041 11162 11204 0,23 0,24 0,24 0,14Bosnia and Herzegovina
508 430 870 667 3843 3829 3829 3831 1,32 1,12 2,27 1,74
Bulgaria 1200 1274 1209 928 7369 7327 7285 7246 1,63 1,74 1,66 1,28Croatia 1186 1905 1840 1095 4412 4398 4262 4247 2,69 4,33 4,32 2,58Cyprus 69 78 144 55 840 862 866 858 0,82 0,90 1,66 0,64Czech Republic 522 547 481 369 10487 10505 10516 10512 0,50 0,52 0,46 0,35Denmark 111 103 84 65 5561 5581 5603 5627 0,20 0,18 0,15 0,12Estonia 346 301 237 187 1340 1340 1320 1316 2,58 2,25 1,80 1,42Finland 431 314 315 186 5375 5401 5427 5451 0,80 0,58 0,58 0,34France 1594 1344 1536 1142 65048 65398 65579 65857 0,25 0,21 0,23 0,17Georgia 395 367 157 102 4469 4498 4498 4491 0,88 0,82 0,35 0,23Germany 1757 1492 1525 1027 81752 81844 80524 80780 0,21 0,18 0,19 0,13Greece 668 722 728 585 11310 11291 11063 10993 0,59 0,64 0,66 0,53Hungary 654 735 991 2402 9986 9958 9909 9879 0,65 0,74 1,00 2,43Iceland 10 10 9 28 318 320 322 326 0,31 0,31 0,28 0,86Ireland 54 55 62 33 4570 4583 4591 4604 0,12 0,12 0,14 0,07Italy 4708 3246 3180 5476 60626 60821 59685 60783 0,78 0,53 0,53 0,90Latvia 291 286 322 298 2075 2042 2024 2001 1,40 1,40 1,59 1,49Liechtenstein 9 16 7 12 36 36 37 37 2,50 4,44 1,89 3,24Lithuania 305 373 428 387 3053 3008 2972 2943 1,00 1,24 1,44 1,31Luxemburg 24 31 38 23 512 525 537 550 0,47 0,59 0,71 0,42Malta 22 26 50 39 415 416 421 425 0,53 0,63 1,19 0,92Republic of Moldova 1017 934 1354 1105 3560 3560 3559 3558 2,86 2,62 3,80 3,11Monaco 8 5 10 4 33 36 36 36 2,42 1,39 2,78 1,11Montenegro 314 180 289 158 618 618 623 624 5,08 2,91 4,64 2,53Netherlands 800 675 778 674 16656 16730 16780 16829 0,48 0,40 0,46 0,40Norway 155 101 148 141 4920 4986 5051 5109 0,32 0,20 0,29 0,28Poland 5022 4071 3968 2761 38530 38538 38533 38496 1,30 1,06 1,03 0,72Portugal 165 217 267 252 10572 10542 10487 10427 0,16 0,21 0,25 0,24Romania 5124 6768 5413 4427 21414 21356 20020 19943 2,39 3,17 2,70 2,22Russia 12454 10746 12328 8952 142857 143056 143507 143507 0,87 0,75 0,86 0,62San Marino 0 1 4 5 32 32 34 34 0,00 0,31 1,18 1,47Serbia 3726 4894 5058 2787 7276 7241 7182 7147 5,12 6,76 7,04 3,90Slovak Republic 553 531 464 324 5392 5404 5411 5416 1,03 0,98 0,86 0,60Slovenia 424 422 496 352 2050 2055 2059 2061 2,07 2,05 2,41 1,71Spain 802 694 781 644 46153 46196 46728 46508 0,17 0,15 0,17 0,14Sweden 1942 546 362 272 9416 9483 9556 9645 2,06 0,58 0,38 0,28Switzerland 358 326 442 303 7870 7955 8039 8137 0,45 0,41 0,55 0,37"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
352 350 535 382 2057 2060 2062 2066 1,71 1,70 2,59 1,85
Turkey 8651 8986 3505 1589 73723 74724 75627 76668 1,17 1,20 0,46 0,21Ukraine 4614 7791 13132 14198 45598 45453 45373 45246 1,01 1,71 2,89 3,14United Kingdom 1542 1702 908 720 62499 62990 63905 64308 0,25 0,27 0,14 0,11Total 64291 64937 65790 56275 819319 822271 820814 823700 0,78 0,79 0,80 0,68SOURCES 2013 and 2014: Internet sites of the Eurostat service (“Population and social conditions” ) or from the United Nations Statistics Division.
Applications allocated to a judicial formation
Population (1000)
Allocated/population(10000)
11/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation
State
Single Judge or
Committee (cat. VI - VII)
Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)
CommunicatedPending
Government action
Admissible TOTAL
Albania 8 181 173 0 4 366Andorra 2 0 2 0 0 4Armenia 184 774 78 0 4 1040Austria 27 57 42 0 2 128Azerbaijan 6 1160 233 0 5 1404Belgium 23 279 54 0 11 367Bosnia and Herzegovina 271 71 13 367 6 728Bulgaria 209 626 122 0 12 969Croatia 87 286 168 0 8 549Cyprus 5 33 30 0 1 69Czech Republic 47 135 27 0 12 221Denmark 1 13 11 0 1 26Estonia 38 14 12 0 3 67Finland 63 14 22 0 2 101France 180 168 122 0 20 490Georgia 12 2117 145 0 2 2276Germany 192 97 40 0 6 335Greece 164 667 354 0 17 1202Hungary 530 1078 203 0 19 1830Iceland 9 9 3 0 1 22Ireland 3 0 0 0 0 3Italy 483 7198 2347 37 22 10087Latvia 154 99 68 0 11 332Liechtenstein 5 2 3 0 0 10Lithuania 26 162 79 0 8 275Luxembourg 4 1 5 0 0 10Malta 3 40 20 0 2 65Republic of Moldova 165 724 251 6 13 1159Monaco 0 1 1 0 0 2Montenegro 368 92 38 0 1 499Netherlands 104 167 56 0 2 329Norway 41 20 6 0 2 69Poland 373 1139 268 0 17 1797Portugal 30 171 73 0 8 282Romania 306 997 1692 333 57 3385Russia 1535 5500 2334 536 85 9990San Marino 2 6 1 0 0 9Serbia 903 652 508 445 15 2523Slovakia 22 113 48 0 15 198Slovenia 72 162 57 1406 3 1700Spain 139 20 46 0 4 209Sweden 13 4 22 0 7 46Switzerland 46 55 38 0 8 147"The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
25 135 75 0 3 238
Turkey 442 7105 1856 0 85 9488Ukraine 930 10793 1894 0 18 13635United Kingdom 65 71 1096 0 11 1243
ALL STATES 8317 43208 14736 3130 533 69924
12/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements from 2012 to 2014
State
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014Albania 2 1 1Andorra 0 0Armenia 2 0Austria 0 0 1 1 8Azerbaijan 0 3 11 1 11 23Belgium 0 0 0 3 1Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 3 43 176 0Bulgaria 28 4 3 85 19 9Croatia 6 3 3 18 31 36Cyprus 0 0Czech Republic 7 20 1 4 12 1Denmark 0 6 1Estonia 0 0 1Finland 4 1 0 8 3 1France 4 2 9 2 2 4Georgia 1 3 14 4 11 15Germany 1 2 3 2 3 2Greece 0 0 3 55 54Hungary 2 3 1 53 73 31Iceland 0 0Ireland 0 1 1 3 0Italy 0 44 27 117 4 9Latvia 1 0 1 1Liechtenstein 0 0Lithuania 0 1 0Luxembourg 0 0Malta 2 0Republic of Moldova 5 21 6 13 8 9Monaco 0 1Montenegro 0 0 1 19 10Netherlands 0 1 1 1 2 4Norway 0 0Poland 40 41 26 111 93 83Portugal 1 5 6 10 4 39Romania 61 38 64 35 29 51Russia 100 102 161 3 39 78San Marino 1Serbia 3 9 52 415 679 1016Slovakia 3 4 3 9 23 9Slovenia 0 1 1 1Spain 0 0 1Sweden 0 1Switzerland 0 0The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia' 1 48 38 67 55 69Turkey 14 27 2 99 86 84Ukraine 313 23 63 178 28 36United Kingdom 2 4 3 7 5 12Grand Total 606 409 502 1303 1481 1696
Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement
13/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Country-specific information
Albania
Chart 9 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 10 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)8
2%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)18150%
Communicated17347%
Admissible4
1%
Total applications366
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2012 2013 2014
111106
83
58
48
129
39
70
38
10 9
21
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
14/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Andorra
Chart 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)2
50%
Communicated2
50%
Total applications4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2012 2013 2014
6
2
5
15
6
2
0 0
12
0 0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
15/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Armenia
Chart 13 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 14 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)18418%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)77474%
Communicated788%
Admissible4
0,4%
Total applications1 040
0
50
100
150
200
250
2012 2013 2014
238
196
154
229
195
56
1119 1616
2 4
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
16/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Austria
Chart 15 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 16 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)27
21%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)57
44%
Communicated42
33%
Admissible2
2%
Total applications128
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2012 2013 2014
377437
315
549
611
387
14 27 1823 22 7
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
17/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Azerbaijan
Chart 17 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 18 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)6
0,4%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)1160
82,6%
Communicated233
16,6%
Admissible5
0,4%
Total applications1 404
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2012 2013 2014
342324
403
694
284
245
34
115 117
3713 11
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
18/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Belgium
Chart 19 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 20 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)236%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)27976%
Communicated54
15%
Admissible113%
Total applications367
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2012 2013 2014
268 270
159
468
253
145
2737
226 9 19
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
19/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Chart 21 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 22 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)27137%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)71
10%
Communicated132%
Pending Government action36750%
Admissible6
1%
Total applications728
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2012 2013 2014
430
870
667
361
1019
1185
29
213
41226
11
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
20/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Bulgaria
Chart 23 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 24 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)20921%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)62665%
Communicated12213%
Admissible121%
Total applications969
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2012 2013 2014
12741209
928
1425
2552
2380
85 44 7772 26 21
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
21/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Croatia
Chart 25 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 26 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)87
16%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)28652%
Communicated16831%
Admissible8
1%
Total applications549
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2012 2013 2014
19051840
1095
2392
2047
1491
59142 115
22 24 33
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
22/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Cyprus
Chart 27 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 28 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)5
7%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)33
48%
Communicated30
44%
Admissible1
1%
Total applications69
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2012 2013 2014
78
144
5555
163 155
2 3 30 1 0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
23/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Czech Republic
Chart 29 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 30 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)47
21%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)13561%
Communicated27
12%
Admissible126%
Total applications221
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2012 2013 2014
547481
369
773827
735
43 36 1230 11 13
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
24/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Denmark
Chart 31 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 32 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)1
4%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)13
50%
Communicated11
42%
Admissible1
4%
Total applications26
Total applications26
0
50
100
150
200
250
2012 2013 2014
103
84
65
201
88
60
8 6 51 0 2
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
25/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Estonia
Chart 33 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 34 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)38
56,7%Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)14
20,9%
Communicated12
17,9%
Admissible3
4,5%
Total applications67
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2013 2014
301
237
187
269
533
451
8 9 98 6 7
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
26/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Finland
Chart 35 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 36 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)63
62,4%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)14
13,9%
Communicated22
21,8%
Admissible2
2,0%
Total applications101
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2012 2013 2014
314315
186
615
300 272
24 21 85 3 12
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
27/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
France
Chart 37 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 38 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)18037%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)16834%
Communicated12225%
Admissible204%
Total applications490
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2012 2013 2014
13441536
1142
2518 2391
1273
45 74 8932 36 24
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
28/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Georgia
Chart 39 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 40 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)121%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)211793%
Communicated1456%
Admissible2
0,1%
Total applications2 276
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2013 2014
367
157
102
521
579
273
30 38 2812 2 3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
29/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Germany
Chart 41 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 42 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)19257%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)97
29%
Communicated40
12%
Admissible6
2%
Total applications335
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2012 2013 2014
1492 1525
1027
2468
3033
1182
22 24 2523 7 13
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
30/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Greece
Chart 43 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 44 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)16414%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)66756%
Communicated35429%
Admissible171%
Total applications1 202
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2012 2013 2014
722 728
585
861
472554
93
188
268
58 43
126
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
31/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Hungary
Chart 45 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 46 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)53029%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)107859%
Communicated20311% Admissible
191,0%
Total applications1 830
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2012 2013 2014
735
991
2402
8401048
2260
106 124 210
27 42 60
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
32/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Iceland
Chart 47 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 48 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)9
41%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)9
41%
Communicated3
14%
Admissible1
4%
Total applications22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2012 2013 2014
10 9
28
1011
17
2 20
20
1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
33/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Ireland
Chart 49 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 50 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3
100%
Total applications3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2012 2013 2014
55
62
33
63 63
51
8
202 2 1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
34/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Italy
Chart 51 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 52 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)4835%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)719871%
Communicated234723%
Pending Government action
370,4%
Admissible220%
Total applications10 087
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2012 2013 2014
3246 3180
5476
2693 2872
9625
148 62
1763
122 78 145
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
35/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Latvia
Chart 53 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 54 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)15446%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)99
30%
Communicated68
21%
Admissible113%
Total applications332
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2012 2013 2014
286322 298296
308
484
16 19 2714 10 19
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
36/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Liechtenstein
Chart 55 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 56 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)5
50%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)2
20%
Communicated3
30%
Total applications10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2012 2013 2014
16
7
12
1514
8
0
3
10
1
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
37/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Lithuania
Chart 57 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 58 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)269%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)16259%
Communicated79
29%
Admissible8
3%
Total applications275
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2012 2013 2014
373 428 387
705
416
356
26 15 2612 12 5
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
38/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Luxembourg
Chart 59 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 60 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)4
40%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)1
10%
Communicated5
50%
Total applications10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2012 2013 2014
31
38
23
3031
26
1 2 32 2
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
39/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Malta
Chart 61 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 62 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3
5%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)40
61%
Communicated20
31%
Admissible2
3%
Total applications65
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2012 2013 2014
26
50
39
20
12
32
129
15
3
10 8
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
40/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Republic of Moldova
Chart 63 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 64 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)16514%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)72462%
Communicated25122%
Pending Government action
61%
Admissible131%
Total applications1 159
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
2012 2013 2014
934
1354
1105
1905
3143
1341
56 85 7332 19 25
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
41/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Monaco
Chart 65 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 66 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)1
50%
Communicated1
50%
Total applications2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2012 2013 2014
5
10
4
7
10
55
0
2
0
3
0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
42/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Montenegro
Chart 67 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 68 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)36874%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)92
18%
Communicated388%
Admissible1
0%
Total applications499
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2012 2013 2014
180
289
158
181
342
446
4 15 29153 1
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
43/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Netherlands
Chart 69 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 70 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)10432%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)16751%
Communicated56
17%
Admissible2
0,6%
Total applications329
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2012 2013 2014
675
778
674
859
1389
796
37 42 257 1 3
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
44/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Norway
Chart 71 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 72 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)41
59%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)20
29%
Communicated6
9%Admissible
23%
Total applications69
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2012 2013 2014
101
148141
165
115
158
2
17
14 4 4
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
45/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Poland
Chart 73 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 74 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)373
20,8%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)1139
63,4%
Communicated268
14,9%
Admissible17
0,9%
Total applications1 797
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
2012 2013 2014
4071 3968
2761
7283
5388
2565
192 154 19374 23 28
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
46/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Portugal
Chart 75 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 76 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)30
11%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)17160%
Communicated73
26%
Admissible8
3%
Total applications282
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2012 2013 2014
217
267252239 236
186
37 26
91
2513 22
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
47/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Romania
Chart 77 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 78 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)3069%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)99729%
Communicated169250%
Pending Government action33310%
Admissible57
1,7%
Total applications3 385
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2012 2013 2014
6768
54134427
10066
7697
7096
439 384869
155 166 127
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
48/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Russian Federation
Chart 79 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 80 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)153516%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)550055%
Communicated233423%
Pending Government action536
5,4%
Admissible85
0,9%
Total applications9 990
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
2012 2013 2014
1074612328
8952
22142
23845
15574
796 699 1101216 257 218
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
49/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
San Marino
Chart 81 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 82 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)2
22%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)6
67%
Communicated1
11%
Total applications9
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
4,5
5
2012 2013 2014
1
4
5
1 1 1
0
1
0
1
0 0
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
50/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Serbia
Chart 83 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 84 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)90336%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)65226%
Communicated50820%
Pending Government action445
17,6%
Admissible150%
Total applications2 523
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2012 2013 2014
4894 5058
2787
1599
3685
11427
905
1421
41839 193 63
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
51/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Slovakia
Chart 85 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 86 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)22
11%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)11357%
Communicated48
24%
Admissible158%
Total applications198
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2012 2013 2014
531
464
324
1079
684
354
43 56 2823 16 14
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
52/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Slovenia
Chart 87 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 88 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)724%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)16210%
Communicated573%
Pending Government action140682,7%
Admissible3
0%
Total applications1 700
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2012 2013 2014
422496
352
1517
896
411
90 48 5722 25 30
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
53/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Spain
Chart 89 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 90 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)13966%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)20
10%
Communicated46
22%
Admissible4
2%
Total applications209
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2012 2013 2014
694781
644
895
1029
790
26 42 1411 13 35
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
54/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Sweden
Chart 91 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 92 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)13
28%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)4
9%
Communicated22
48%
Admissible7
15%
Total applications46
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2012 2013 2014
546
362
272
894
365
311
3210 415 16 8
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
55/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Switzerland
Chart 93 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 94 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)46
31%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)55
37%
Communicated38
26%
Admissible8
5,4%
Total applications147
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2012 2013 2014
326 442
303341
1197
403
23 24 98 13 19
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
56/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Chart 95 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 96 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)25
10%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)13557%
Communicated75
32%
Admissible3
1,3%
Total applications238
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
2012 2013 2014
350
535
382
618
850
492
155126 73
8 9 10
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
57/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Turkey
Chart 97 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 98 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)4425%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)710575%
Communicated185619%
Admissible851%
Total applications9 488
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2012 2013 2014
8986
3505
1589
7914
9011
2784
422 508200134 190 115
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
58/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
Ukraine
Chart 99 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 100 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)9307%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)1079379%
Communicated189414%
Admissible180%
Total applications13 635
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2012 2013 2014
7791
1313214198
7305
8049
12731
1032
2934
738301
2281
1073
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
59/60
ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2014
United Kingdom
Chart 101 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body
Graph 102 Major procedural steps in processing applications
Single Judge or Committee
(cat. VI - VII)655%
Chamber or Committee -awaiting first examination
(cat. I - V)716%
Communicated109688%
Admissible111%
Total applications1 243
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2012 2013 2014
1702
908
720
2047
1633
1970
48 35
1071
35 19 27
Applications allocated to a judicialformation
Applications declared inadmissible orstruck out
Applications communicated to theGovernment
Applications in which judgments delivered
60/60