+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Anand S. Nagoo, Ph.D. - Multiphase Flow Science Group at … · code is for design and optimization...

Anand S. Nagoo, Ph.D. - Multiphase Flow Science Group at … · code is for design and optimization...

Date post: 18-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: dangnga
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
43
2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science 1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo) 1 Anand S. Nagoo, Ph.D. Department of Petroleum & Geosystems Engineering The University of Texas at Austin, USA Improved Speed and Reliability of Averaged (1D) Multiphase Flow Calculations for Use in Combined 1D-CMFD Field-Scale Process Simulations: Validation of PipeFractionalFlow and CMFD codes
Transcript

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

1

Anand S. Nagoo, Ph.D.

Department of Petroleum & Geosystems Engineering

The University of Texas at Austin, USA

Improved Speed and Reliability of Averaged (1D)

Multiphase Flow Calculations for Use in Combined

1D-CMFD Field-Scale Process Simulations:

Validation of PipeFractionalFlow and CMFD codes

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

2

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

What is PipeFractionalFlow?

What is PipeFractionalFlow? An analytical averaged (1D) code

for rapid and reliable predictions of steady-state and transient

multiphase flow variables along wellbores and pipelines. The

code is for design and optimization of field-scale processes.

GUI EXE

XLS RPi

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

3

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

3

Theory Overview + Four CMFD Applications

• Introduction to the Pipe Fractional Flow Theory underlying the

PipeFractionalFlow™ C++ code

• Use of the Pipe Fractional Flow Theory to reformulate and unify prior

volume fraction models

• Benchmarking against current and former commercial1D codes

• Experimental validation against PipeFractionalFlow and multiphase

CFD codes

– Converging-diverging-converging gas-liquid nozzle flow

– Transient riser-base gas lift for liquids removal

– Non-Newtonian multiphase gas-liquid-solid slurry flow

– Dilute pneumatic conveying gas-solid flow

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

4

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

4

Several Modeling Approaches

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

5

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

5

Averaging in Space and Time

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

6

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

6

Some 1D modeling applications in Oil & Gas

- Real-time drawdown management and downhole surveillance & monitoring

- Minimize need (and huge costs) for permanent DHPG installs in new wells

- Provide reliable DHPG simulation in old wells with faulty/non-functioning gauges

- Steady-state and transient three-phase flow analytical predictions from surface

- Fast simulations for closed loop optimization & reservoir model calibration

- System modeling at discrete level (multi-segmented approach)

- Analytical phase volume fraction modeling

- Minimize need (and huge costs) for multiple field flow meters & maintenance

- Gas lift, ESP pump intake modeling, liquids loading, plunger lift optimization, etc.

• Accurate downhole pressure from surface at low cost (THE PRIZE)

• Transient real-time modeling for surveillance & optimization

• Wellbore and pipeline flow rate calculations (virtual flow metering)

• Horizontal well artificial lift modeling

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

7

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

7

Some CMFD modeling applications in Oil & Gas

• Heat transfer in Christmas tree

• Severe slugging in riser

• Sand transport in pipes (PnC, slurries)

• Cuttings transport modeling in wellbores (mud rheology, density, etc.)

• Hydrate formation

• Slug flow around pipe elbow

• Non-Newtonian multiphase flows

• Three phase separator

• Temperature effects in transportation of viscous oil

• Etc…

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

8

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

8

Goal: Combined 1D-CMFD Co-Simulation

• Fast enough to provide to provide answers within design timeframe

• Accurate enough to provide sufficiently insightful answers for better

design decisions

• 1D simulator for long wellbores and pipelines; 3D CMFD simulator for

3D equipment, transition regions

• User friendly environment for activating the right mix of high-fidelity tools for the problem of interest

• Why?

– It’s cheaper and safer to be wrong in the virtual world!

– Expand the modeling scope and lifecycle

– Dynamic boundary specs. vs. fixed (invalid) boundary specs.

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

9

What Differentiates Us – Analytical Theory

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

10

What We Generate – Fractional Flow Curves

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

11

How We Standout – A Modern Approach

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

12

Rationale for Fractional Flow Method

mixu

uf

2

2

1

2

1,2v

vH

2

21,2

1,2

2122

222

2111

ssH

H

svsv

sv

u

uf

mix

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

13

Rationale for Fractional Flow Method

11

1

2

2

1,2

2

f

fH

s

1

2

2

2

2

1,2

11

f

f

s

sH

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

14

Volume Fraction Models as Slip Ratios

2

2

1,21

102.1

,2

0

f

s

uH

mix

v

Cmix

1

2

2

71.0,]12[

1.0

1

2

4.0

1

2

9.0

2

2

1,2

1128.0

f

f

f

fH

ttXparameterMartinelliandLockhart

2

2

5.0

1,21

135.02.1

,2

0

f

s

u

gDH

mix

v

C

mix

5.0

1

2

1,2

Fauske

H

And so on…

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

15

Drift-Flux Equations as Slip Ratios

mix

mix

u

vC

s

f ,2

0

2

2

2

2,2

01,21

1

f

s

u

vCH

mix

mix

mixv

parameter

slipparticle

averaged

parametersparticletoparticle

averaged

mix

velocityslip

averaged

s

vssuCS

,2

2

1,22

201,211

Different quantities! (relation between “global” and “local”)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

16

E.g. Woldesmayat and Ghajar (2007)

Fractional flow paths (solid lines in left chart above) as compared against

two published datasets (diamond and circular points above) from Spedding

and Nguyen (1976), spanning a wide range of flow patterns and flow rates

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

17

Insight 1 – Capture Interrelationships

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

18

Insight 2 – Reduce Uncertainty

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

19

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

19

Benchmarking and Validation

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

20

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

20

Publicly Verifiable Benchmarking

Cousins, Denton and Hewitt

(1965) – Exp. # 49, data also in

Table . of Wallis’s One Dimensional Flow textbook

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

21

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

21

Publicly Verifiable Benchmarking

Owen, D. G.: An

experimental and

theoretical analysis

of equilibrium

annular flows, Ph.D.

Dissertation, Dept.

of Chem. Eng., U. of

Birmingham (1986)

Also available from

Theofanous, T. G.,

Amarasooriya, W.

H.: Dataset no. 1 -

pressure drop and

entrained fraction in

fully developed

flow, Multiphase Sci.

and Tech., v. 6, part

1, pp. 5-13 (1992)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

22

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

22

Publicly Verifiable Benchmarking

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

23

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

23

Publicly Verifiable Benchmarking

• Crowley et al. (1986)

• Slug Flow

• Large Diam., Fr12-Water

High Gas Density

• Johnson (1996)

• Stratified Roll Waves*

• Med. Diam., SF6-Water

High Gas Density

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

24

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

24

Publicly Verifiable Benchmarking

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

25

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

25

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Pougatch, K.,

Salcudean, M., Chan,

E., Knapper, B.:

Modeling of

compressible gas-liquid

flow in a convergent-

divergent nozzle,

Chem. Eng. Sci., v. 63,

pp. 4176-4188 (2008)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

26

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

26

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

27

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

27

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Same

scale! Multiple cases in the paper - lines

are our predictions. Demonstrates

the accuracy of our in-situ phase

flow rate calculations.

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

28

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

28

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

29

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

29

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

30

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

30

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

31

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

31

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

32

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

32

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

33

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

33

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

34

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

34

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Kapok

Choke (2004) Flambouyant

Flowline (1996)

Eroded

Choke

Internals

Immortelle

Separator

Dangers of

sand/solids

production in

oil and gas –

an unforgiving

problem!

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

35

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

35

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Luo and Gidaspow (1997)

Dissertation Data

3” diameter riser

Air-Glass Beads (520 μm)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

36

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

36

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Luo and Gidaspow (1997)

Dissertation Data

3” diameter riser

Air-Glass Beads (520 μm)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

37

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

37

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Rautiainen et al. (1999)

J. Powder Technology

8” diameter riser

Air-Glass Beads (64 μm)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

38

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

38

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Wang and Zhu (2005)

Intl. J. Multiphase Flow

1” diameter riser

Air-Glass Beads (20 μm)

Electrostatics and Adhesion

CMFD model

in paper

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

39

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

39

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

Zenz Plot

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

40

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

40

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

CMFD model

in paper

Henthorn and Curtis (2005)

J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

1” diameter riser

Air-Glass Beads (70, 200 μm)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

41

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

41

Experimental Validation – PFF vs. CMFD

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

42

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

42

Take Home Message

• Insightful analytical modeling leads to improved understanding of averaged

(1D) multiphase flow behaviors. Analytical prediction brings significant practical

implications for 1D codes – breaking speed and accuracy limits in field-scale

design and optimization of multiphase flow problems

• The new analytical formulation underlying the PipeFractionalFlow code have

been successfully used to predict (and compared side-by-side) the macroscopic

averaged results from published CMFD papers and experiments.

• The net of the co-existing and competing local flow microphysics (the resultant

collective behavior of the flowing multiphase mixture) are captured in our

physics-based averaged analytical equations.

• New value outcome = integrating via up-scale and down-scale calculations fast

and reliable field-scale 1D simulation with advanced, local CMFD codes for

process simulations, i.e. PipeFractionalFlow can be used as reliably accurate

boundary conditions for CMFD codes (such as MFiX, STAR-CCM+, Fluent, etc.)

2017 DOE-NETL Multiphase Flow Science

1D simulations of averaged CMFD results for combined 1D-CMFD process flows (Nagoo)

43

Thanks to all for your time!

Acknowledgements

• Department of Petroleum & Geosytems Engineering | pge.utexas.edu

• Pipe Fractional Flow, LLC | pipefractionalflow.com


Recommended