ANNUAL REPORT - Abogado

JUDICIARYANNUAL REPORT

THE

2017

MESSAGE

ANTONIO T. CARPIOSenior Associate Justice(Per Section 12, R.A. 296,

The Judiciary Act of 1948, as amended)

Ordained and promulgated by the sovereign Filipino people, the 1987 Constitution serves as the basic and paramount law to which all other laws must conform. As can be gleaned from its Preamble, the 1987 Constitution was established in order to build a just and humane society and establish a government that embodies the ideals and aspirations of the Filipino people. It was enacted in order to promote the common good, conserve and develop the nation’s patrimony, and secure to the Filipino people and their posterity the blessings of independence and democracy under the Rule of Law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace. Being the highest law of the land, it is elementary that all persons, including the highest officials of the land, accede to the 1987 Constitution. It cannot be gainsaid that constitutional principles and doctrines must be respected at all times. They cannot be subjected to the whims and caprices of the government and its officials who run it.

No less than the 1987 Constitution confers the power of judicial review on the Judicial Branch of the government. Section 1, Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution provides that judicial power includes “the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the government.” Notably, the aforesaid provision in the 1987 Constitution introduced the concept of the expanded certiorari jurisdiction of the courts of justice, ensuring the potency and power of judicial review to curb grave abuse of discretion by any branch or instrumentality of the government. Under their expanded certiorari jurisdiction, courts of justice are able to determine the limits of power of the agencies and offices of the government.

In the case of Angara vs. Electoral Commission (63 Phil. 139, 15 July 1936), it was held that “in cases of conflict, the Judicial Department is the only constitutional organ which can be called upon to determine the proper allocation of powers between the several departments and among the integral or constituent units thereof.” Undoubtedly, judicial review is pertinent in the enforcement and fortification of the delicate system of checks and balances and the fundamental principle of the separation of powers among the three departments of the government.

In order to ensure continued public faith, the Judicial Department must be resolute in its commitment to the Rule of Law and in the promotion and protection of the basic rights and fundamental liberties of the Filipino people. Given its pertinent role in the fortification and furtherance of democratic principles and civil liberties, as enshrined in and protected by the 1987 Constitution, the Judicial Branch cannot and must not forget that it is highly accountable to the people and to the country.

In order to ensure continued public faith, the Judicial

Department must be resolute in its commitment to the Rule of Law and in the promotion and protection of the basic

rights and fundamental liberties of the Filipino

people. Given its pertinent role in the fortification and furtherance of democratic principles and civil liberties,

as enshrined in and protected by the 1987 Constitution,

the Judicial Branch cannot and must not forget that it is highly accountable to the people and to the country.”

SUPREME COURT

COURT OF APPEALS

ANTONIO T. CARPIOSenior Associate Justice

PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, JR.Associate Justice

DIOSDADO M. PERALTAAssociate Justice

MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLOAssociate Justice

MARVIC M. V. F. LEONENAssociate Justice

ALFREDO BENJAMIN S. CAGUIOAAssociate Justice

NOEL GIMENEZ TIJAMAssociate Justice

ALEXANDER G. GESMUNDOAssociate Justice

TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTROAssociate Justice

LUCAS P. BERSAMINAssociate Justice

ESTELA M. PERLAS-BERNABEAssociate Justice

FRANCIS H. JARDELEZAAssociate Justice

SAMUEL R. MARTIRESAssociate Justice

ANDRES B. REYES, JR.Associate Justice

Associate Justice REMEDIOS SALAZAR-FERNANDO Associate Justice ROSMARI D. CARANDANG Associate Justice JOSE C. REYES, JR. Associate Justice FERNANDA LAMPAS PERALTA Associate Justice MAGDANGAL M. DE LEON Associate Justice JAPAR B. DIMAAMPAO Associate Justice CELIA C. LIBREA- LEAGOGO Associate Justice MARIFLOR P. PUNZALAN CASTILLO Associate Justice SESINANDO E. VILLON Associate Justice RAMON M. BATO, JR. Associate Justice APOLINARIO D. BRUSELAS, JR. Associate Justice RAMON R. GARCIA Associate Justice RICARDO R. ROSARIO Associate Justice MARLENE GONZALES-SISON Associate Justice PRISCILLA J. BALTAZAR-PADILLA Associate Justice MARIO V. LOPEZ Associate Justice STEPHEN C. CRUZ Associate Justice JANE AURORA C. LANTION Associate Justice ELIHU A. YBAÑEZ Associate Justice FRANCHITO N. DIAMANTE Associate Justice AMY C. LAZARO-JAVIER Associate Justice RODIL V. ZALAMEDA Associate Justice MANUEL M. BARRIOS Associate Justice SAMUEL H. GAERLAN

Associate Justice DANTON Q. BUESER Associate Justice EDWIN D. SORONGON Associate Justice RAMON A. CRUZ Associate Justice MYRA V. GARCIA-FERNANDEZ Associate Justice EDUARDO B. PERALTA, JR. Associate Justice RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO Associate Justice NINA G. ANTONIO-VALENZUELA Associate Justice VICTORIA ISABEL A. PAREDES Associate Justice CARMELITA SALANDANAN MANAHAN Associate Justice ZENAIDA T. GALAPATE-LAGUILLES Associate Justice PEDRO B. CORALES Associate Justice MARIA ELISA SEMPIO DIY Associate Justice MA. LUISA QUIJANO PADILLA Associate Justice RENATO C. FRANCISCO Associate Justice JHOSEP Y. LOPEZ Associate Justice MARIE CHRISTINE AZCARRAGA JACOB Associate Justice HENRI JEAN PAUL B. INTING Associate Justice MARIA FILOMENA D. SINGH Associate Justice PABLITO A. PEREZ Associate Justice RAFAEL ANTONIO M. SANTOS Associate Justice GERMANO FRANCISCO D. LEGASPI Associate Justice RONALDO ROBERTO B. MARTIN Associate Justice GERALDINE C. FIEL-MACARAIG Associate Justice GABRIEL T. ROBENIOL

M a n i l aPresiding Justice ROMEO F. BARZA

Executive Justice Cebu Station GABRIEL T. INGLES Associate Justice EDGARDO L. DELOS SANTOS Associate Justice PAMELA ANN ABELLA MAXINO Associate Justice MARILYN B. LAGURA-YAP Associate Justice EDWARD B. CONTRERAS Associate Justice LOUIS P. ACOSTA Associate Justice EMILY R. ALIÑO-GELUZ Associate Justice DOROTHY P. MONTEJO-GONZAGA

C e b u S tat i o n ( V i s aya s S tat i o n )Executive Justice Cagayan de Oro Station ROMULO V. BORJA Associate Justice EDGARDO A. CAMELLO Associate Justice EDGARDO T. LLOREN Associate Justice OSCAR V. BADELLES Associate Justice PERPETUA T. ATAL-PAÑO Associate Justice RUBEN REYNALDO G. ROXAS Associate Justice TITA MARILYN B. PAYOYO-VILLORDON Associate Justice WALTER S. ONG

C a g aya n d e O r o S tat i o n ( M i n d a n a o S tat i o n )

SANDIGANBAYAN COURT OF TAX APPEALS

AMPARO M. CABOTAJE-TANGPresiding Justice

ROMAN G. DEL ROSARIOPresiding Justice

ERLINDA PIÑERA UYAssociate Justice

LOVELL R. BAUTISTAAssociate Justice

ESPERANZA R. FABON-VICTORINOAssociate Justice

JUANITO C. CASTAÑEDA, JR.Senior Associate Justice

CAESAR A. CASANOVAAssociate Justice

CATHERINE TRIUNFANTE MANAHANAssociate Justice

CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLAAssociate Justice

MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBANAssociate Justice

RAFAEL R. LAGOSAssociate Justice

EFREN N. DE LA CRUZAssociate Justice

GERALDINE FAITH A. ECONGAssociate Justice

MICHAEL FREDERICK L. MUSNGIAssociate Justice

BERNELITO R. FERNANDEZAssociate Justice

MA. THERESA DOLORES C. GOMEZ-ESTOESTAAssociate Justice

KARL B. MIRANDAAssociate Justice

GEORGINA D. HIDALGOAssociate Justice

EDGARDO M. CALDONAAssociate Justice

MARYANN E. CORPUS-MAÑALACAssociate Justice

ALEX L. QUIROZAssociate Justice

REYNALDO P. CRUZAssociate Justice

SARAH JANE T. FERNANDEZAssociate Justice

ZALDY V. TRESPESESAssociate Justice

OSCAR C. HERRERA, JR.Associate Justice

MARIA THERESA V. MENDOZA-ARCEGAAssociate Justice

KEVIN NARCE B. VIVEROAssociate Justice

LORIFEL LACAP PAHIMNAAssociate Justice

BAYANI H. JACINTOAssociate Justice

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

CONTENTS

Drug-relatedCases

Cases withEconomic Impact

Gender-relatedCases

21PAGE

Adjudication ofJudicial Cases

12PAGE

29PAGE

33PAGE

The 2017 Judiciary Annual Report (JAR) is submitted in compliance with Article VIII, Section 16 of the 1987 Constitution.It is the Judiciary’s report card on its operations and activities for the past year.

Adjudication Reports:Judicial Cases (for the entire judiciary);

Gender-Related Cases (for the Supreme Court and the three third-level collegiate courts);Cases involving Women and Children (for the lower courts);

Drug-Related Cases (for the SC, CA and lower courts)

Administrative Actions against:Members of the judiciary;

Court personnel; and Lawyers

Reports on:Budget Expenditures for the Halls of Justice;

Activities of the:Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA);

Mandatory Continuing Legal Education Office (MCLEO), and Philippine Mediation and Conciliation Office (PMCO)

Statistics on the SC, CA, CTA, and SB docket

Statistics on Separate Opinions issued by SC Justices

Decisions with Economic Impact (for the SC, CA, and CTA)

Admission to the Philippine Bar

Updates on Pending and Continuing Reform Programs

Update on the Vice-Presidential Electoral Protest pending before the Presidential Electoral Tribunal

The 2017 JUDICIARY ANNUAL REPORT covers the following areas:

Unless indicated otherwise, all statistics provided are as of December 31, 2017.

This year’s JAR contains some items that have not been reported in previous Annual Reports. For the first time, each court reports on gender- and drug-related cases, and decisions with economic impact on the country.

This JAR also contains an update on judicial reforms, including the results of the recently-approved Continuous Trial System in Criminal Cases and the Small-Claims Courts.

Total amount of money in favor of the government arising from denied claims for refund and upheld tax assessments in 2017 by the Court of Tax Appeals.P5,435,153,153.53

Report on TROs Issued Against Government Infrastructure ProjectsTOTAL NUMBER OF TROS ISSUED AGAINST

GOVERNMENT PROJECTS IN 2017: 1

ADJUDICATION OF JUDICIAL CASES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017

2017 DOCKET(SUPREME COURT)

12

16STATISTICS ON SEPARATE OPINIONS (SUPREME COURT) 17

GENDER-RELATED CASES(SANDIGANBAYAN)

2017 DOCKET(COURT OF APPEALS) 20

GENDER-RELATED CASES(COURT OF APPEALS) 23

24

GENDER-RELATED CASES (SUPREME COURT) 21

DRUG-RELATED CASESDECIDED BY THE COURT EN BANC

CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT(SUPREME COURT)

DRUG-RELATED CASES(SUPREME COURT)

DRUG-RELATED CASES(COURT OF APPEALS)

DRUG-RELATED CASES(LOWER COURTS)

29

33

30

31

32

CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT (SANDIGANBAYAN) 40

CASES INVOLVING WOMEN AND CHILDREN FOR THE YEAR 2017(LOWER COURTS) 24

CaseloadStatistics

Administrative Actions Against Supreme Court Personnel

Administrative Actions Against

Lower Court Judges

46

63

65

PAGE

PAGE

PAGE

Budget forHalls of Justice

EnhancedJustice on Wheels

71 76PAGE PAGE

CASELOAD STATISTICS BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017(COURT OF APPEALS)

TRO ON GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

ADJUDICATION OF CASES(SECOND LEVEL COURTS)PER JUDICIAL REGION

46

52

53

DISPOSED CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT FOR 2017 (COURT OF APPEALS) 43

DISPOSED CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT FOR 2017 (COURT OF TAX APPEALS) 44

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSAGAINST LOWER COURT JUDGES

ADJUDICATION OF JUDICIAL CASES (SHARIA DISTRICT COURT AND SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT)

65

VICE PRESIDENTIALELECTORAL PROTEST 62

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSAGAINST JUSTICES 64

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSAGAINST PERSONNEL OFTHIRD LEVEL COURTS 64

61

ADMINISTRATIVEACTIONS AGAINSTSUPREME COURT PERSONNEL 63

2017 BARSTATISTICS 70

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS AGAINST PERSONNELOF THE FIRST AND SECONDLEVEL COURTS INCLUDING SHARI’A COURTS 65

DISCIPLINARY CASESAGAINST LAWYERS

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSACCORDING TO JUDICIAL REGION

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSACCORDING TOGEOGRAPHICAL REGION

69

66

68

JUDICIAL ANDBAR COUNCIL 75

2017 BUDGET FORHALLS OF JUSTICE 71

COMPLETED BUDGETFOR HALLS OF JUSTICE 72

2018 REPORT ON BUDGETFOR HALLS OF JUSTICE 73

ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTPHILIPPINE JUDICIAL ACADEMY 74

PMCO’SADR PROGRAMS 75

MANDATORY CONTINUINGLEGAL EDUCATION OFFICE (MCLE) 76

ENHANCED JUSTICE ON WHEELS (EJOW) 76

AUTOMATEDHEARING SYSTEM 76

SMALLCLAIMS COURT 77

CONTINUOUSTRIAL SYSTEM 77

ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS PLAN 78

12 13THE JUDICIARY ANNUAL REPORT THE JUDICIARY ANNUAL REPORT2017 2017

ADJUDICATION OF JUDICIAL CASESAS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017

COURT OF APPEALS

Accomplishment Rate

CLEARANCERate

T o t a l C a s e l o a d

Pending Cases as of December 31, 2016

(Adjusted to correctprior reports)

109% 43%

98%

DISPOSITIONRate

C a s e I n f l o w

New CasesReinstated/

Revived/ Reopened Cases

13,006 342

32,903

14,179

19,555

2017 TARGETCASE DISPOSAL

14,520Total Case

Disposal (including Archived

Cases)


18,724

SUPREME COURT

Accomplishment Rate

CLEARANCERate





87% 39%

97%

DISPOSITIONRate

C a s e I n f l o w



6,564 18

14,411

5,685

7,829


5,840Total Case


Cases)

8,726

TOTAL CASELOAD includes pending cases as of December 31, 2016, new cases, and reinstated/revived/reopened cases.

TOTAL CASE DISPOSAL includes disposed cases and archived cases.

DISPOSITION RATE is the percentage of the total case disposal overthe total caseload.

CLEARANCE RATE is the percentage of the total case disposal over the new cases.

ACCOMPLISHMENT RATE is the percentage of the total case disposal over the target case disposal.

1 Based on 94% report submission








SANDIGANBAYAN

Accomplishment Rate

CLEARANCERate





51% 19%

306%

DISPOSITIONRate

C a s e I n f l o w



2,513 44

6,771

1,278

4,214


418Total Case


Cases)

5,493

COURT OF TAX APPEALS

Accomplishment Rate

CLEARANCERate




106% 28%

143%

DISPOSITIONRate

C a s e I n f l o w



475 22

1,786

502

1,289


352Total Case


Cases)


1,284


SECOND LEVEL COURTS

Accomplishment Rate DISPOSITION RateCLEARANCE RateTotal

Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

253,453

20,674

872,259 2017 TARGETCASE DISPOSAL

207,850

110%91% 26%

Reinstated/ Revived/ Reopened Cases

New Cases


Pending Cases as of December 31, 2016(Adjusted to correct prior reports)

642,598

Total Case Disposal (including Archived Cases)

229,661

598,132

REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS 1


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

253,390

20,672


207,791

111%91% 26%


New Cases



642,482


229,627

598,047

SHARI’A DISTRICT COURTS 2


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

632

150 2017 TARGETCASE DISPOSAL

59

58%54% 23%


New Cases



116


34

85

FIRST LEVEL COURTS


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

180,989

23,812


217,840

97%117% 56%


New Cases



167,161


210,976

173,336

METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS 3


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

62,21210,444


85,376

86%118% 60%


New Cases



49,153


73,255

49,752

Total Caseload

1,250,396 (EXCEPT FAMILY COURTS)

TOTAL INLOWERCOURTS

809,759440,637771,468

Pending Cases as ofDecember 31, 2016

(Adjusted to correct prior reports)



MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS IN CITIES 4


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

73,5949,077


84,222

100%114% 56%


New Cases



64,681


83,974

65,984

MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS 5


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

22,2382,343


25,957

104%122% 49%


New Cases



27,859


27,113

30,391

FAMILY COURTS 8 (ALREADY INCLUDED IN RTC CASES)


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

30,9494,120


41,857

90%121% 36%


New Cases



65,983


37,517

68,431

MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS 6


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

22,0911,929


21,626

120%117% 51%


New Cases



24,434


25,936

26,350

SHARI’A CIRCUIT COURTS 7


Caseload

C a s eI n f l o w

85419


659

106%82% 40%


New Cases



1,034


698

859

CLEARANCERate

DISPOSITIONRateACCOMPLISHMENT

Rate

104%101% 35% 44,486

425,6902017 Target

Case Disposal

434,442

C A S E I N F L O W

New Cases Reinstated/ Revived/ Reopened Cases


REGULAR APPEALED CASES

CASE OUTPUT

CA/SB/RTC, etc. 4,868 4,650 5,096 6,017 6,344

COA

COMELEC

CSC

OMB

NLRC

BIR

CHR

DOLE

SEC

DAR

DOTC

SSC

SUBTOTAL

DENR

NCIP

ECC

DOJ

OP

HLURB

20

112

6

101

5

-

1

-

2

1

1

-

-

1

-

1

-

1

-

86

47

2

102

4

1

-

-

-

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

86

71

3

126

1

-

-

1

-

-

-

1

1

-

1

-

2

2

1

75

145

-

188

2

-

-

-

-

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

71

49

-

152

3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

2

-

-

ORIGINAL ACTIONS 114 90 87 72 61

TOTAL CASE INPUT 5,234 4,986 5,478 6,503 6,683

4,640 4,992 5,063 6,025 5,627

2017 DOCKET STATISTICS ON SEPARATE OPINIONS (SUPREME COURT)

En Banc Cases First Division Cases Second Division Cases Third Division Cases TOTAL

JUDICIAL MATTERS

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Concurring and Dissenting

Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


Opinion

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes P. A. Sereno0 03 50 0 8

Justice Bienvenido L. Reyes0 00 00 0 0

Justice Diosdado M. Peralta3 10 10 0 5

Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa1 44 30 0 12

Justice Presbitero J. Velasco, Jr.4 01 11 0 7

Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen11 27 23 0 25

Justice Mariano C. Del Castillo1 01 00 0 2

Justice Noel Gimenez Tijam3 00 00 0 3

Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo0 00 00 0 0

Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio 0 05 00 0 5

Justice Estela M. Perlas-Bernabe4 10 01 0 6

Justice Lucas P. Bersamin1 00 00 0 1

Justice Samuel R. Martires2 01 00 0 3

Justice Teresita J. Leonardo-De Castro2 00 00 0 2

Justice Francis H. Jardeleza1 02 01 0 4

Justice Jose Catral Mendoza0 00 00 0 0

Justice Andres B. Reyes, Jr.0 00 00 0 0

TOTAL33 0 6 224 5 4 36 0 0 0 81



ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


















TOTAL1 0 0 02 0 0 01 0 0 0 4


BAR MATTERS

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Dissenting Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


Opinion


















TOTAL3 0 0 00 0 0 01 0 0 0 4


G.R. No.228887

People of the Philippines vs.

Dominador Udtohan y Jose

Qualified Rape and Acts of

Lasciviousness

Aug. 2,2017

G.R. No.220718

People vs.Tubillo Rape June 21,

2017

G.R. No.218970

Escalante vs. People

Child Abuse June 28, 2017

JUSTICEMENDOZA

G.R. No. 224295

People of the Philippines

vs. MendozaRape March 22, 2017

G.R. No.215730


Melchor Panes y Magsanop

Qualified Rape (RPC) Sep. 11, 2017

G.R. No.214880


Amante Padlan y Leones @ Butog

Statutory Rape & Acts of Lasciviousness

(RPC in relation to RA 7610)

Sep. 6, 2017

JUSTICEDEL CASTILLO

G.R. No. 212193 Rape

G.R. No.207943

People of the Philippines vs. Robert Balanza

Rape (RPC as amended by RA 8353 in relation

to RA 7610)

Sep. 11, 2017

Feb. 15, 2017

G.R. No.199894

People of the Philippines vs. Claro Rape April 5, 2017

G.R. No.203114

Awas vs. Peopleof Philippines

Anti-Child Abuse (RA 7160) June 28, 2017

G.R. No.225743


Domingo

Forcible Abduction with Rape

June 7, 2017

G.R.No.

222180

People of the Philippinesvs. Bragat

Rape Nov. 22, 2017

SENIORASSOCIATE

JUSTICECARPIO

G.R. No.214497

G.R. No.224583

Quimvel vs.People

People vs.Palanay

Acts of Lasciviousness

Qualified Rape

April 18,2017

Feb. 1, 2017

JUSTICEVELASCO JR.

G.R. No.215194

G.R. No.217982

Garlet vs. Garlet

People of the Philippines vs. Deloso

People of the Philippines vs. Dizon

Annulment of Marriage:

Psychological Incapacity of Husband

QualifiedRape

Statutory Rape and Rape by

Sexual Assault

Aug. 2, 2017

Dec. 14, 2017

July 10, 2017JUSTICEPERALTA

G.R. No.215331

People vs.Belen Rape

G.R. No.218574


Macapagal

Acts of Lasciviousness in

relation to RA 7610 Qualified Rape

(RPC)

Nov. 22, 2017

G.R. No.218575

People of the Philippines

vs. Ursua

Qualified Rape & Sexual Abuse under

RA 7610Oct. 4, 2017

G.R. No.227705


Hermin Romobioy Pauler

Robbery with Rape Oct. 11, 2017

G.R. No.225065


Armando Labarque a.k.a “Arman”

Rape (RPC as amended by RA 8353 in relation

to RA 7610)

Sep. 13, 2017

G.R. No.218114

People of the Philippinesvs. Aycardo

Acts of Lasciviousness June 5, 2017

G.R. No.212201

People of the Philippinesvs. Deniega

Statutory Rape June 28, 2017

Jan. 23, 2017

G.R. No.227185 People vs. EEE Qualified Rape Sep. 27, 2017

GENDER-RELATED CASES(SUPREME COURT)

CASE NO. CASE TITLE NATURE OF CASEDATE OF

PROMULGATION


PROMULGATION

JUSTICEBERSAMIN

JUSTICELEONARDO-DE CASTRO

JUSTICEB. L. REYES

G.R. No.193544

G.R. No.216938

People of the Philippinesvs. Bentayo

Rape June 5, 2017

People of the Philippines vs. Tionloc

Filing Year

COMELEC

CA

SE

S F

ILE

D NLRC/DOLE

COA 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

CSC

Office of the Ombudsman

Office of the President

Office Quasi-Judicial Bodies*

TOTAL CASES FILED

CASES DISPOSED

COURT OF APPEALS (CEBU)

*e.g., DOJ, DOLE, SSS, ECC, ERC, HLURB, DARAB, NCMB, CIAC

2017 DOCKET

Filing Year

COMELEC

CA

SE

S F

ILE

D NLRC/DOLE

COA 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

CSC




TOTAL CASES FILED

CASES DISPOSED

COURT OF APPEALS (CAGAYAN DE ORO)

*e.g., DARAB, etc.

Filing Year

COMELEC

CA

SE

S F

ILE

D NLRC/DOLE

COA 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

CSC




TOTAL CASES FILED

CASES DISPOSED

COURT OF APPEALS (MANILA)

*e.g., CHED, DAR, DARAB, DENR, DOH, DOJ, DPWH, DTI, ERC

Filing Year

COMELEC

CA

SE

S F

ILE

D NLRC/DOLE

COA 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

CSC




TOTAL CASES FILED

CASES DISPOSED

COURT OF APPEALS (COURTWIDE)

*e.g., CHED, DAR, DARAB, DENR, DOH, DOJ, DPWH, DTI, ERC

1

1

2,422

1,953

4

1

210

147

247

181

100

87

511

420

3,495

2,790

3,596

2,756

0

0

2,380

1,905

4

2

173

122

223

158

156

139

528

446

3,464

2,772

3,393

2,681

0

0

2,240

1,822

3

1

225

181

325

246

45

40

402

346

3,240

2,636

3,296

2,377

1

1

2,900

2,410

1

1

183

142

559

399

24

22

523

454

4,191

3,429

3,205

2,386

2

1

2,627

2,128

1

1

215

176

617

415

16

14

592

512

4,070

3,247

1,513

851

0

198

2

40

43

11

71

365

312

0

174

0

36

37

12

54

313

268

0

114

1

24

46

2

37

224

232

0

193

0

33

121

2

56

405

209

1

177

0

28

117

2

54

379

90

0

271

1

23

23

2

20

340

454

0

301

2

15

28

5

28

379

376

0

304

1

20

33

3

19

380

591

0

297

0

8

39

0

13

357

537

0

322

0

11

85

0

26

444

485


GENDER-RELATED CASES(COURT OF APPEALS)


Case Inflow

Total Case Input

Total Case Output


Pending Casesas of

December 31, 2017

Disposition Rate (1)

Disposition Rate (1)

Clearance Rate (2)

Clearance Rate (2)

[1] Rate of disposed cases vis-à-vis total number of pending cases (Total Case Output / Total Case Input x 100)

[2] Rate of disposed cases vis-à-vis new cases (Total Case Output / New Case (Case Input 2017) x 100)

M A N I L A ( N C R )

90 113

205 230

295 343

203 251

92 92

69% 73%

99% 109%

M A N I L A L U Z O N

131 71

79 41

210 112

92 64

118 48

43% 57%

116% 156%

Total Case Output 2017

Pending Casesas of

December 31, 2016

Case Inflow

Total Case Input

T O TA L

610

350

120%

405555

960

61%

C E B U C A G AYA N D E O R O

G.R. No.229100


AgoncilloRape Nov. 20,

2017JUSTICE

GESMUNDO

G.R. No. 212814

People of the Philippines vs.Carillo, et al.

Rape July 12, 2017

G.R. No. 196342/ G.R. No. 196848

People of the Philippines vs. Noel Go Caoili alias “Boy Tagalog” Noel Go

Caoili vs. People of the Philippines

Lascivious Conduct under Section 5(b)

of RA 7610Aug. 8, 2017

G.R. No. 223138

People vs. Primavera Rape July 5, 2017

G.R. No. 219952


Jehlson Aguirre y Arididon, et al.

Qualified Trafficking in

Persons under Section 6(a) of RA 9208 (Child

Trafficking)

Nov. 20, 2017

G.R. No. 223513

People of the Philippines vs. Amar Rape July 5, 2017

G.R. No. 215195

People of the Philippines vs.Descartin, Jr.

Statutory Rape June 7, 2017

G.R. No. 216987

People of the Philippines vs. Pacayra Rape June 5, 2017

G.R. No. 228248


Romeo De Guzman y De Castro

Qualified Rape (RPC) Aug. 9, 2017

G.R. No. 219615


AgudoRape June 7, 2017

G.R. No. 220143


BaayRape June 7, 2017

G.R. No. 216937

People of the Philippines vs. Amoc Rape June 5, 2017

G.R. No. 217459

People of the Philippines vs. Alberca Qualified Rape June 7, 2017

G.R. No. 218942

People of the Philippines vs. Bisora Qualified Rape June 7, 2017

G.R. No. 212934

People of the Philippines vs. Gaa Rape June 7, 2017

G.R. No.225146

Rogelio B. Antone vs. People of the

PhilippinesStatutory Rape Nov. 20, 2017

G.R. No.230975

People of the Philippines vs. Niebres Statutory Rape Dec. 4, 2017

G.R. No.224631


Rubillar, Jr.Rape Aug. 23, 2017

G.R. No.214673

Rizaldo L. Orsos vs. People of

the Philippines

Lascivious Conduct under Section 5(b)

of RA 7610Nov. 20, 2017

JUSTICEPERLAS-BERNABE

G.R.No.

214771


BongbongaRape Aug. 9,

2017JUSTICECAGUIOA

People of the Philippines vs. Austria

Statutory Rape/Qualified Rape

Nov. 8,2017

G.R. No. 208625


Ramon Francica y Navalta

Statutory Rape(RPC as amended

by RA 8353 in relation toRA 7610)

Sep. 6, 2017

G.R. No. 207666


TayabanRape Nov. 22, 2017

G.R. No.218592

Topel vs. People of the Philippines

Art. 336 of theRPC in relation to

RA 7610Aug. 2, 2017

G.R. No. 221443

People of the Philippines vs. Ladra

Rape/Acts of Lasciviousness

July 17, 2017

G.R. No. 218404


Rolando Bagsic y Valenzuela

Rape by Sexual Assault (RA 8353

in relation toRA 7610)

Dec. 13, 2017

G.R. No.207946

People of the Philippines vs. Reyes

Rape with Homicide Sep. 27, 2017

JUSTICEMARTIRES

G.R. No. 214762


RonquilloStatutory Rape Sep. 20, 2017


PagamucanStatutory Rape Nov. 8, 2017

G.R. No. 208013

People of the Philippines vs. Corpuz

Rape July 3, 2017

G.R. No. 212161


EntrampasStatutory Rape March 29, 2017

G.R. No. 210654


ArmodiaRape June 7, 2017

G.R. No. 181489

Pavlow vs. Mendenilla

Anti-violence Against Women

and Their Children Act of 2004

RA 9262

April 19, 2017

G.R. No. 217764

Antonieta Lucio @Tonyay vs. People of the Philippines

Child Abuse under Section 10(a)of RA 7610

Aug. 7, 2017

G.R. No. 207776


GacusanRape April 26, 2017


PROMULGATION


PROMULGATION

JUSTICELEONEN

G.R. No. 207772

G.R. No. 210568

JUSTICETIJAM

G.R. No. 223678


GunsayRape July 5, 2017

G.R. No. 220889


Belmonte, et al.Robbery with Rape July 5, 2017

JUSTICEA. REYES JR.


FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

CASE OUTFLOW

TOTALMALE

4,589

3,886

508

195

5,092

3,223

1,542

327

6,577

5,442

4,637

588

217

5,716

3,700

1,772

244

8,476

10,031

8,523

1,096

412

10,808

6,923

3,314

571

15,053

FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

CASE OUTFLOW

TOTALMALE

852

650

22

180

502

335

43

124

1,053

1,185

951

21

213

610

437

49

124

1,294

2,037

1,601

43

393

1,112

772

92

248

2,347

Newly Filed Cases

Revived/Reopened Cases

Referred Cases (from other Salas)

Decided/Resolved Cases

Archived Cases

Transferred Cases (to other Salas)

Newly Filed Cases




Archived Cases


H A N D L I N G J U D G E


CHILD ABUSE

PENDING CASES AS REPORTED BYTHE LOWER COURTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017


DRUG USERS (MINORS)

GENDER-RELATED CASES (SANDIGANBAYAN)

CASES INVOLVING WOMEN AND CHILDREN FOR THE YEAR 2017(LOWER COURTS)

FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

CASE OUTFLOW


TOTALMALE

VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

5,056

4,145

738

173

5,886

3,882

1,799

205

5,090

6,308

5,351

823

134

7,270

4,715

2,316

239

7,141

11,364

9,496

1,561

307

13,156

8,597

4,115

444

12,231

Newly Filed Cases




Archived Cases



5

5

4

44%

9

100%

4Pending Cases as of December 31, 2016


CaseInflow

DispositionRate

Total CaseInput

ClearanceRate

Total CaseOutput


FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

Newly Filed Cases


TOTALMALE

322

276

32

14

364

338

21

5

686

614

53

19

CASE OUTFLOW


Archived Cases

224

112

88

24

412

327

236

85

6

925

551

348

173

30

1,337

FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

TOTALMALE

1,147

950

121

76

2,143

1,714

298

131

3,290

2,664

419

207

Newly Filed Cases


CASE OUTFLOW 1,052

616

357

79

1,692

2,230

1,095

846

289

3,193

3,282

1,711

1,203

368

4,885


Archived Cases



RAPE BY AND AGAINST A MINOR


Transferred Cases (to other Salas)PENDING CASES AS REPORTED BYTHE LOWER COURTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017

FEMALE MALE

RAPE UNDER RA 8353





FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

TOTALMALE

63

46

11

6

117

80

32

5

180

126

43

11

Newly Filed Cases



CASE OUTFLOW 70

52

14

4

151

110

64

41

5

241

180

116

55

9

392


Archived Cases



RAPE COMMITTED BY A MINOR



RAPE AGAINST A MINOR

FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

TOTALMALE

4,254

3,249

725

280

6,003

4,915

808

280

10,257

8,164

1,533

560

Newly Filed Cases


CASE OUTFLOW 4,671

2,642

1,622

407

8,753

5,927

3,328

2,258

341

10,964

10,598

5,970

3,880

748

19,717


Archived Cases



DRUG-RELATED CASESDECIDED BY THE COURT EN BANC

G.R. No. 232413In the matter of the Petition for Issuance of Habeas Corpus with

Petition for Relief/Integrated Bar of the Philippines Pangasinan Legal Aid

and Jay-R. Senin,

Department of Justice, Provincial Prosecutor’s office, Bureau of Jail Management and Penology, and

Philippine National Police.

VS.

Article 125 of theRevised Penal Code, Waiver

The Court declared, and ruled, that all detainees whose pending cases have gone

beyond the mandated periods for the conduct of preliminary investigation, or

whose cases have already been dismissed on inquest or preliminary investigation,

despite pending appeal, reconsideration, reinvestigation or automatic review by

the Secretary of Justice, are entitled to be released pursuant to their constitutional right to liberty and their constitutional

right against unreasonable seizures, unless detained for some other lawful cause.

SUBJECT MATTER

G.R. No. 226679Salvador Estipona, Jr. y Arsuela,

Hon. Frank E. Lobrigo, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 3, Legazpi City, Albay and

People of the Philippines.

VS.

Section 23, Article II of the Republic Act No. 9165 (Plea-Bargaining Provision) The Court declared Section 23 of RA

9165, or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, which prohibited plea bargaining in all drug cases, as

unconstitutional for being contrary to the rule-making authority of the Supreme

Court under Section 5(5), Article VIII of the 1987 Constitution.

SUBJECT MATTER

DATE DECIDED

AUGUST

15GRANTED

2 0 1 7

PONENTE

ASSOCIATE JUSTICEDIOSDADO M. PERALTA

G.R. No. 229781

Hon. Juanita Guerrero, in her capacity as Presiding Judge, Regional Trial

Court of Muntinlupa City, Branch 204, People of the Philippines, P/Dir. Gen. Ronald M. Dela Rosa, in his capacity as Chief of the Philippine National

Police, P/Supt. Philip Gil M. Philipps, in his capacity as Director, Headquarters

Support Service, Supt. Arnel Jamandron Apud, in his capacity as

Chief, PNP Custodial Service Unit, and all persons acting under their control, supervision, instruction or direction in relation to the orders that may be

issued by the Court.

Senator Leila M. De Lima,

VS.

Violation ofRepublic Act No. 9165, Jurisdiction

The Court ordered the Regional Trial Court of Muntinlupa City, Branch 204 to proceed

with dispatch with Criminal Case No. 17-165 (People vs. Leila De Lima, et al.).

SUBJECT MATTER

DATE DECIDED

OCTOBER

10DISMISSED

2 0 1 7

PONENTE

ASSOCIATE JUSTICEPRESBITERO J. VELASCO, JR.

PONENTE

ASSOCIATE JUSTICEJOSE CATRAL MENDOZA

DATE DECIDED

JULY

25

2 0 1 7

GRANTED

CASE OUTFLOW


Archived Cases

231

120

86

25

212

100

76

18

6

205

331

196

104

31

417

CASE OUTFLOW 4,812

3,485

956

371

5,199

4,233

3,086

897

250

6,738

9,045

6,571

1,853

621

11,937


Archived Cases

FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

Newly Filed Cases


TOTALMALE

266

164

45

57

150

137

12

1

416

301

57

58


FEMALE

CASE INFLOW

TOTALMALE

4,230

3,449

478

303

4,007

3,313

387

307

8,237

6,762

865

610

Newly Filed Cases



VIOLATION OF THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACT

ALL OTHER CASES INVOLVING CHILDREN AND FAMILY







DRUG-RELATED CASES(COURT OF APPEALS)

Pending Cases as of December 2016

Total Pending Cases

New Cases

Total New Cases 2017

Total Cases Input 2017

By Minute/Extended with Resolution

Subtotal Pending Cases as of Dec. 2017

By Decision

Total Pending Cases as of Dec 31, 2017

Subtotal Case Output 2017

Disposition Rate [1]

Total Case Output

Clearance Rate [2]

Pend

ing

Case

s 20

16

TOTAL

Case

Out

put

2017

New

Cas

eIn

put

2017

Tota

l Pe

ndin

g Ca

ses

2017

373

877

15

268

253

617

585

1,223

690

1,483

29%

50%

2,100

504

25

349

324

638

793

287

157 124 898

268

398

28%

59%

555

268

182

326

28%

68%

450

1,432

1,673

2,207

29%

54%

3,105

Manila(NCJR)

Manila(LUZON)

CAGAYANDE OROCEBU

[1] Rate of disposed cases vis-à-vis total number of pending cases(Total Case Output / Total Case Input x 100)

[2] Rate of disposed cases vis-à-vis new cases(Total Case Output / New Case x 100)

F I R S T D I V I S I O N

S E C O N D D I V I S I O N

T h i r d D I V I S I O N

TOTAL

170

106

213

131

163

145

301

269

358

86

53

67

66%

33%

46%

29%

20%

19%

215

216

291

489 439 928 206 722 22% 47%




Pend

ing

Case

s as

of

Dece

mbe

r 31

, 201

6

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of

Dece

mbe

r 31

, 201

7




C A S E I N F L O WN E W C A S E S



CASE

INF

LOW

NEW

CAS

ES

TOTA

LCA

SE i

nput

TOTA

L CA

SECA

SE o

utpu

t

DISP

OSIT

ION

RATE

CLEA

RANC

ERA

TE

T o ta lC A S E I N P U T

T o ta lC A S E I N P U T

T o ta lC A S E I n p u t

D i s p o s i t i o nR at e



T o ta lC A S E O U T P U T

T o ta LC A S E O U T P U T

T o ta lC A S E O U T P U T

C l e a r a n c eR at e



DRUG-RELATED CASES (SUPREME COURT)*

*Data is limited to cases filed with the Supreme Court via Rule 124, Section 13,as amended by A.M. No. 00-9-03-SC, thus excluding cases filed via Rule 45 or 65.


BEGINNING BALANCE

Newly Filed Cases

REGIONALTRIAL

COURTS



Archived Cases

Pending Cases as ofDec. 31, 2017

TOTAL INPUT

TOTAL OUTPUT

DISPOSITION RATE

CLEARANCE RATE

DRUG-RELATED CASES(LOWER COURTS)

TOTAL INPUT = Beginning Balance + Newly Filed/Raffled Cases + Revived/Reopened CasesTOTAL OUTPUT = Decided/Resolved Cases + Archived Cases

254,622

289,295

34,673

12%

42%

204,795

83,396

31,995

1,104

2,678

Metropolitan Trial Courts

0

0

0

0

-

-

0

0

0

0

MunicipalTrial Court

in Cities

6

8

16

8

50%

89%

9

7

1

1

Municipal Circuit Trial

Courts

1

2

2

0

0%

-

0

0

1

0

Municipal Trial Courts

3

1

3

2

67%

-

0

2

0

0

TOTAL

204,805

254,633

289,316

34,683

12%

42%

83,405

32,004

1,106

2,679

DISPOSITION RATE = ( Total Output / Total Input ) * 100CLEARANCE RATE = ( Total Output / Newly Filed Cases ) * 100

C A S E I N P U T

C A S E O U T P U T

CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT (SUPREME COURT)Case No. Case TITLE NATURE OF CASE DATE

G.R. Nos. 231658; 231771 & 231774

Lagman, et al. vs. Medialdea, et al.; Cullamat, et al. vs. Executive Secretary, et al.; Mohamad, et al. vs. Executive Secretary, et al.

Martial Law 12/5/2017

G.R. No. 229335 Eminent Domain; Just Compensation

11/29/2017Republic of the Philippines, et al. vs. Belly H. Ng

G.R. No. 229256 The Government Procurement Act (RA 9184); All government acquisition of goods and services shall be done through competitive bidding-National Printing Office failed to comply

11/22/2017Marietta Maglaya De Guzman vs. Office of the Ombudsman and Bestforms, Inc.

G.R. No. 227544 Tax assessment 11/22/2017Commissioner ofInternal Revenue vs. Transitions Optical

G.R. Nos. 210689-90, 210704 & 210725

G.R. No. 156208

Corporate income tax, franchise tax; withholding of fringe benefit tax; tax exemption

EPIRA

11/22/2017

11/21/2017

PAGCOR vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. PAGCOR

NPC Drivers and Mechanics Association (NPC DAMA), et al. vs. The National Power Corporation (NPC), et al.

G.R. No. 220367

G.R. Nos. 193020 & 193040-42; G.R. Nos. 193349-54

Expropriation (Award of Just Compensation andConsequential Damages)

11/20/2017National Power Corporation vs. Marasigan

Cedeño vs. People and Sandiganbayan; Pundaodaya vs. Sandiganbayan and People

RA 3019; Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act committed by a public officer

11/8/2017

G.R. No. 197519 VAT refunds 11/08/2017Mindanao I Geothermal Partnership vs. CIR

G.R. No. 218418 Public Land classifiedas inalienable

11/08/2017Republic of the Philippines represented by the DENR vs. Heirs of Meynardo Cabrera

G.R. No. 205665 Public Land Act on classificationas alienable and disposable

10/4/2017Republic of the Philippines vs.Metro Cebu Pacific Bank


Case No. Case TITLE NATURE OF CASE DATE

G.R. No. 197886 The Government Procurement Act (RA 9184; All government procurement must undergo competitive bidding)

10/4/2017Office of the Ombudsman vs. Antonio Z. De Guzman

G.R. Nos. 171836 & 195213

Eminent Domain;Just compensation

10/2/2017Department of Agrarian Reform vs. Susie Irene Galle; Landbank vs. Susie Irene Galle

G.R. No. 227505 Illegal Recruitment in Large Scale 10/2/2017People of the Philippines vs. Erlinda Racho y Somera

G.R. No. 213953 Election Matter; Creation of a separate local legislative body

9/26/2017Marmeto vs. Comelec

A.C. No. 11543 Legal Ethics on Notary Public acknowledging deed of sale with much lower price depriving the government of correct amount of taxes

9/26/2017Basiyo & Simmonsvs. Alisuag

G.R. No. 170316 Public Lands;Judicial Confirmation of Title

9/18/2017Republic of the Philippines vs.Spouses Joel andAndrea Noval, et al.

G.R. No. 179732

G.R. Nos. 218628; 218631

G.R. Nos. 201665; 201668

G.R. No. 205652

CIAC monetary award against government agency (Government Infrastructure Contract)

Eminent Domain;Just Compensation

Withholding tax;Time to withhold tax

Refund of Tax(Unutilized Input VAT)

9/13/2017

9/6/2017

8/30/2017

9/6/2017

DPWH vs.CMC/Monark/Pacific/Hi-Tri Joint Venture

Evergreen Manufacturing Corporation vs. Republic; Republic vs. Evergreen Manufacturing Corporation

Edison (Bataan) Cogeneration Corporation vs. CIR; CIR vs. Edison (Bataan)Cogeneration Corporation

Procter & Gamble Asia Pte, Ltd. vs. CIR

G.R. No. 185420 Real property taxation 8/29/2017Lanao del Norte Electric Cooperative vs.Provincial Government ofLanao del Norte, et al.


G.R. No. 195457 Involuntary Separation Benefits for Employees Retrenched to Prevent Economic Losses

8/16/2017 Read-Rite Philippines, Inc. vs. Francisco, et al.

G.R. No. 216161 Tax Amnesty 8/9/2017Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Philippine Aluminum Wheels, Inc.

G.R. No. 198146 Refund of Tax (Deficiency VAT) 8/8/2017Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation vs. CIR

G.R. No. 217965 Coco Levy Funds as public funds 8/8/2017CCFOP vs. Aquino III

G.R. No. 190004

G.R. Nos. 187257; 187776

Expropriation (Award ofJust Compensation)

Money judgment against government agency in relation to the New Compensation Plan under RA 6758; set aside writ of execution granting back payment of additional COLA and AA to NAPOCOR employees set aside

8/8/2017

8/8/2017

Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Dalauta

Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) as the People’s Tribune, et al. vs. Hon. Luisito G. Cortez, Presiding Judge, RTC, Br. 84, Quezon City, et al.; Rolando G. Andayam, et al. vs. Hon. Luisito G. Cortez, Presiding Judge, RTC, BR 84, Quezon City, et al.

G.R. No. 197297

G.R. Nos. 144760-61; 167311-12; 167316-17

G.R. Nos. 186329; 186584-86; 198598

Public Land Act on classification as alienable and disposable

RA 3019; Public bidding is required in all government purchases

Art. 171, RPC:Falsification by a Public Officer

8/2/2017

8/2/2017

8/2/2017

Republic of the Philippines vs.Spouses Go

Miranda vs. Sandiganbayan and Ombudsman; Miranda vs. Sandiganbayan and People; Nava vs. Sandiganbayan and People

Malabanan vs. Sandiganbayan; Alid vs. Sandiganbayan; Alid vs. People of the Philippines

G.R. No. 191615 Agrarian reform case on land acquisition partaking the natureof expropriation

8/2/2017Cabral vs. Heirs of Florencio Adolfo and Elias Policarpio

G.R. No. 223366 Eminent Domain; Just Compensation

8/1/2017National Transmission Corporation vs. Oroville Development Corporation



G.R. No. 210669 Public Property;re Road right of way

8/1/2017Hi-Lon Manufacturing, Inc.vs. COA

G.R. No. 181953 Department of Agrarian Reform, formulas translating the Factors in Determining Just Compensation

7/25/2017Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Rural Bank of Hermosa(Bataan), Inc.

G.R. No. 196412 Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (RA 6657; Just compensation)

7/19/2017Landbank of the Philippinesvs. Omengan

G.R. No. 183408 Taxation 7/12/2017CIR vs. Lancaster Philippines, Inc.

G.R. No. 223844 Illegal expenditures 6/28/2017Cariaga vs. Sapigao and Acosta

G.R. No. 214500 Illegal recruitment 6/28/2017People of the Philippines vs. Dela Cruz

G.R. No. 213088

G.R. Nos. 176703; 176721

A.M. No.P-15-3335 (Formerly A.M. No. 15-04-98-RTC)

Franchises and certificates of public convenience

Local business taxes and realty taxes

6/28/2017

6/28/2017

6/28/2017

6/21/2017

LTFRB vs.G.V. Florida Transport, Inc.

Municipality of Cainta vs.City of Pasig and Uniwide Sales Warehouse Club, Inc.; Uniwide Sales Warehouse Club, Inc. vs. City of Pasig and Municipalityof Cainta

Deposit of government fundsOCA vs. Atty. Bantiyan,Clerk of Court VI, et al.

G.R. No. 219070 Land registration (PD 1529)Espiritu, Jr., et al. vs.Republic of the Philippines

G.R. No. 194137 Remittance of contributions 6/21/2017Ambassador Hotel, Inc. vs. SSS

G.R. No. 198162 Anti-Graft andCorrupt Practices Act

6/21/2017Lacap vs. Sandiganbayan [Fourth Division], et al.

G.R. No. 209518 Land title 6/19/2017Tujan-Militante vs. Nustad, as represented by Atty. Lucila

G.R. No. 202922 Tax refund 6/19/2017CIR vs.Semirara Mining Corporation

G.R. No. 195876 Notice requirement as mandated in CMO 15-94 (Revised Guidelineson Abandonment)

6/19/2017Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation vs.Commissioner of Customs


G.R. No. 223334 Just compensation 6/7/2017Bartolata and Pilot vs.Republic of the Philippines, et al.

G.R. No. 210266 Access device fraud 6/7/2017De Silva Cruz vs. People

G.R. No. 205428 Capital gains tax 6/7/2017Republic of the Philippines, represented by the DPWH vs. Spouses Salvador

G.R. No. 195003 Ordinance re: power to regulate right to use ground water

6/7/2017City of Batangas, represented by Hon. Abaya, in her capacity as City Mayor of Batangas, vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, et al.

G.R. No. 215061 Disallowance of the Extraordinary and Miscellaneous Expenses of the ex officio members of the Monetary Board

Fraud/Illegal disbursementof Public funds

6/6/2017Tetangco, Jr., et al.vs. COA

G.R. No. 211093

G.R. Nos. 159139; 174777

Local taxation 6/6/2017

6/6/2017

Mindanao Shopping Destination Corporation, et al. vs. Hon. Duterte, in his capacity as Mayor of Davao City, et al.

Information Technology Foundation of the Philippines, et al. vs. COMELEC, et al.; Pimentel, Jr., et al. vs. Navarro-Gutierrez, in her capacity as Ombudsman

G.R. No. 204906 Government Procurement Act(RA 9184)

6/5/2017DPWH Secretary Datumanong,et al. vs. Malaga

G.R. No. 198485 Tax refund 6/5/2017Marubeni Philippines Corporation vs. CIR

G.R. No. 192723

G.R. No. 175772

G.R. No. 218666

SALN 6/5/2017

6/5/2017

4/26/2017

De Castro vs. Field Investigation Office, Office of the Ombudsman and Commissioner of Customs

Tax refundMitsubishi Corporation (Manila Branch) vs. CIR

Certification proceedingsNoche, in her own behalf and as counsel for Petitioners, et al. vs.Hon. Garin, Secretary- Designate of the DOH, et al.



G.R. Nos. 217872; 221866

G.R. No. 212778

CARL (RA 6657) 4/26/2017

4/26/2017

Alliance for the Family Foundation (Phils.), Inc., et al. vs. Hon. Garin, Secretary-Designate of the DOH, et al.; Noche, in her own behalf and as counsel for Petitioners, et al. vs. Hon. Garin, Secretary-Designate of the DOH, et al.

Castro and Sebastian vs.Mendoza, Sr., on his behalf and as attorney-in-fact of Bustos Public Market II Vendors and Stall Owners Association, et al.

Agrarian reform

G.R. No. 206168 Free patent application 4/26/2017Republic of the Philippines represented by Raw-An Point ElementarySchool, vs.Spouses Lasmarias, et al.

G.R. No. 178467 Breach of contract; Use of Counterfeit US dollar bills

4/26/2017Spouses Carbonell vs. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co.

G.R. No. 205279 Refunds or credits of input tax 4/26/2017Visayas Geothermal Power Co.vs. CIR

G.R. No. 199669

G.R. Nos. 201530; 201680-81

Tax deduction

Tax abatement

4/25/2017

4/19/2017

4/19/2017

Southern Luzon Drug Corporation vs. DSWD, et al.

CIR vs. Asiatrust Development Bank, Inc.; Asiatrust Development Bank, Inc. vs. CIR

G.R. No. 213948 Petition for Injunction/condominium development project

4/25/2017Knights of Rizal vs.DMCI Homes, Inc. et al.

G.R. No. 185348 Declaratory relief/Interpretationof Municipal Waters

Tambuyog Development Center, Inc., represented by Umengan vs. De Borja, et al.; Republic of the Philippines, oppositor

G.R. No. 185320 Declaratory relief/Interpretationof Municipal Waters

4/19/2017De Borja vs. (“PUMALU-MV”), et al.; Republic of the Philippines, oppositor

G.R. No. 164795 HLURB 4/19/2017TGN Realty Corporation vs.Villa Teresa Homeowners Association, Inc.


G.R. Nos. 220598; 220953

G.R. Nos. 216538; 216954

Plunder Law (RA 7080)

Trust Funds Government Accounting Code of the Philippines (PD 1445)

4/18/2017

4/18/2017

Macapagal-Arroyo vs.People of the Philippines and Sandiganbayan; Aguas vs. Sandiganbayan (First Division)

DBP vs. COA;Antonio, et al. vs. COA

G.R. No. 181284 IPRA (RA 8371) 4/18/2017Unduran, et al., vs.Aberasturi, et al.

G.R. No. 207246 Public utility entities 4/18/2017Roy III vs.Chairperson Herbosa, et al.

G.R. No. 210251

G.R. Nos. 186717; 190357

Excise tax on cigarettes

AMLA (RA 9160)

4/17/2017

4/17/2017

Secretary Purisima, et al. vs. Philippine Tobacco Institute, Inc.

Republic of the Philippines represented by the Anti-Money Laundering Council vs. Bolante, et al.; Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Anti-Money Laundering Council vs. Judge Dumayas

G.R. No. 186421 Violation of Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (RA 3019)

4/17/2017Fuentes vs.People of the Philippines

G.R. No. 182582 Tax refund 4/17/2017Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co.vs. CIR

G.R. No. 222743 VAT 4/5/2017Medicard Philippines., Inc.vs. CIR

G.R. No. 186603 Agrarian reform 4/5/2017Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Regional Executive Director, DENR, Region VI, Iloilo City vs.Espinosa, et al.

G.R. No. 192345 Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (RA 6657) Just compensation

3/29/2017Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Spouses Esteban and Chu



G.R. No. 193828 Application of Law of Acquisition of Right-of-way, Site or Location for National Government Infrastructure Projects (RA 8974, Just Compensation)

3/27/2017Republic of the Philippines represented by the MIAA vs.Heirs of Eladio Santiago

G.R. No. 175726 Eminent Domain 3/22/2017Land Bank of the Philippinesvs. Heirs of Antonio Marcos, Sr.

G.R. No. 192536 Taxation (Disputed assessment) 3/15/2017Alcantara vs. Republic of the Philippines, represented by BIR, Revenue Region No. 11-B, Davao City, et al.

G.R. No. 193987 Comprehensive Agrarian ReformLaw (RA 6657; Just compensation)

3/13/2017Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Phil-Agro Industrial Corporation

G.R. No. 180654 Taxation (Franchise Tax) 3/6/2017NAPOCOR vs. Provincial Government of Bataan, et al.

G.R. No. 213943 Taxation (Filing of false return) 3/22/2017CIR vs. Philippine Daily Inquirer, Inc.

G.R. No.215705 to 215707

G.R. No. 190809

Taxation

Part-Time Employees’ Retirement Benefits

2/22/2017

2/13/2017

CIR et al. vs.Philippine Airlines, Inc.

De La Salle Araneta University vs. Juanito C. Bernardo

G.R. No. 221590 Taxation (Assessment) 2/22/2017CIR vs. Asalus Corporation

G.R. No. 203514 Application of National Internal Revenue Code of 1997(Income Tax Exemption)

2/13/2017CIR vs. St. Luke’s Medical Center

G.R. No. 202597 Taxation (Tax refund) 2/8/2017Spouses Pascual vs.First Consolidated Rural Bank (Bohol), Inc., et al.

G.R. No. 193381 Application of 2007 Tax Amnesty Law (RA 9480)

2/8/2017CIR v.s APO Cement Corporation

G.R. No. 201326 Taxation (VAT) 2/8/2017Sitel Philippines Corporation (Formerly ClientlogicPhilippines, Inc. vs. CIR


G.R. Nos. 187257 & 187776

Application of Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989(RA 6758)

2/7/2017Republic of the Philippines represented by the OSG as the People’s Tribune, et al. vs.Hon. Cortez, Presiding Judge, RTC, Br. 84, Quezon City, et al.

G.R. No. 190431

G.R. Nos. 184450; 184508; 184538; 185234

G.R. Nos. 213027; 213253

G.R. Nos. 189158 and 189530

G.R. No. 170506

G.R. Nos. 205045; 205723

Government Contracts:Build Operate Transfer Law(RA 6954)

Recovery of illegally acquired assets and properties ofthe Marcoses

Penal Charges under theCorporation Code

Agrarian Reform:Just Compensation

Taxation

Taxation (Excise Tax)

1/31/2017

1/24/2017

1/18/2017

1/11/2017

1/11/2017

1/25/2017

Bayan Muna Party-List Representative Satur C. Ocampo, et al. vs. Leandro R. Mendoza,et al.

Soriano, et al. vs. Secretary of Finance and CIR; Senator Roxas vs. Teves and Hefti; TUCP vs. Teves and Hefti; Senator Escudero, et al. vs. Teves and Esquivias IV

Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos vs. Republic of the Philippines; Marcos and Araneta vs. Republic of the Philippines

Ient and Schulze vs. Tullett Prebon (Philippines), Inc.; Ient and Schulze vs. Tullett Prebon (Philippines), Inc.

Land Bank of the Philippines vs. Heirs of Lorenzo Tañada and Expedita Ebarle

CIR vs. San Miguel Corporation


CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT (SANDIGANBAYAN)

SB-13-CRM-0102 - 0103

SB-15-CRM-0073 & 0076

SB-11-CRM-0256 - 0257

SB-11-CRM-0036 - 0037

SB-15-A/R-0008

SB-17-CRM-0284

Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act

Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Falsification of Public Documents

Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Malversation of Public Funds

Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act

Forfeiture of Unlawfully Acquired Properties

Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, Illegal use of Public Funds, Malversation of Public Funds

December 7, 2017

November 17, 2017

September 29, 2017

August 18, 2017

July 18, 2017

January 10, 2017

People of the Philippines vs. Jesus S. Salceda, Sr., et al.

People of the Philippines vs. Jesus Loretizo Nieves

People of the Philippines vs.Tito S. Sarion

People of the Philippines vs.Raul R. Lee

Republic of the Philippines vs.Manuel P. Valencia

People of the Philippines vs. Santiago S. Labayen


DISPOSED CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT (COURT OF APPEALS)

Associate JusticeGARCIA

Case No.

Case TITLE

Filing Date Date of Promulgation

Remarks

CA-G.R. CV-105430

Filipino Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Inc., represented by General Manager Debra Ann Gaite vs.Anrey, Inc., represented by president Miguel Anton

Infringement of Copyright

9/7/2015 4/19/2017

Associate JusticeMANAHAN CA-G.R. SP-135157

CA-G.R. SP-135158

Bargn Farnaceutici Philippines, Inc. vs.Hearst Communications, Inc.

5/6/2014

Remarks Trademark

Filing Date

3/31/2017Date of Promulgation

Case No.

Case TITLE

Associate JusticeFRANCISCO CA-G.R. SP-137480

SEL-J Pharma, Inc., vs. the Director General, Intellectual Property Office and United Laboratories, Inc.

10/08/2014

Remarks Confusingly similar trademarks

Filing Date


Case No.

Case TITLE

Associate JusticeFERNANDEZ

Remarks Trademark Registration

Filing Date

Case No.

Case TITLE

CA-G.R. SP-132366

Ginebra San Miguel, Inc. vs. Office of the Director General and/or Director of the Bureau of Trademarks, Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines

10/22/2013Date of Promulgation5/17/2017

Associate Justice INTING, S. B. CA-G.R. SP-140218

National Bureau of Investigation-Nestle Philippines, Inc. vs.Hon. Leila M. de Lima, in her capacity as Secretary of Justice and Lailanie Tamang y Santiago/L.S. Tamang Store

Deception, passing off and fraud upon the public are still the key elements that must be present for unfair competition to exist

4/23/2015

Remarks

Filing Date


Case No.

Case TITLE


Remarks Unfair Competition

Filing Date

Case No.

Case TITLE

CA-G.R. SP-133365

Wilton Dy and Philites Lighting and Electronics, Inc., vs. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Philips Electronics Lighting, Inc.


8/30/2017


Remarks Unfair Competition

Filing Date

Case No.

Case TITLE

CA-G.R. SP-133664

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Philips Electronics Lighting, Inc. vs. Wilton Dy and Philites Lighting andElectronics, Inc.


8/30/2017

PENDING REVIEW WITHTHE SUPREME COURT





DISPOSED CASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPACT (COURT OF TAX APPEALS)

JANUARY

JAN2017

FEBRUARY

FEB2017

MARCH

MAR2017

APRIL

APR2017

MAY

MAY2017

JUNE

JUN2017

T A X P A Y E R S ’ C L A I M F O R R E F U N DDENIED

106,217,979.09

173,617,420.37

40,587,603.71

137,099,144.00

41,659,221.63

153,849,216.23

41,504,879.42

212,808,159.13

74,578,267.63

69,381,444.78

293,501,898.50

298,093,981.02

170,581,849.14

8,633,537.39

13,244,883.00

169,926,978.31

58,996,592.88

920,685,809.50

380,943,899.64

540,129,383.00

135,542,699.45

332,777,347.65

338,398,059.83

101,796,048.73

UPHELDGRANTED CANCELLEDA S S E S S M E N T A G A I N S T T A X P A Y E R S

TOTAL IN FAVOR OF GOVERNMENT

5,435,153,153.53

T A X P A Y E R S ’ C L A I M F O R R E F U N DDENIED UPHELDGRANTED CANCELLED

A S S E S S M E N T A G A I N S T T A X P A Y E R S

JULY

JUL2017

AUGUST

AUG2017

SEPTEMBER

SEP2017

OCTOBER

OCT2017

NOVEMBER

NOV2017

DECEMBER

DEC2017

10,283,416.31

236,360,985.95

60,063,008.73

257,937,355.15

223,876,749.86

22,610,505.01

1,464,162,606.04

104,507,197.17

25,704,280.86

2,546,788,438.68

168,397,337.99

135,724,662.31

0.00

3,970,990,547.49

330,538,896.95

120,665,571.04

185,845,368.23

97,781,244.22

45,205,847.21

158,288,380.89

2,280,394,958.76 TOTAL

967,498,347.46

857,611,234.12

15,889,748.87

49,469,186.44

194,524,400.31

34,431,758.75

3,949,012,114.25

TOTAL IN FAVOR OF TAXPAYER

6,229,407,073.01


MANILASTATION(NCR/LUZON)

PENDING CASES AS OF DECEMBER 2016

CASE OUTPUT 2017BY MINUTE/EXT. RESOLUTION

MANILA(NCR)

CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases

CASEINFLOW 9,878

2,725

2,087

5,066

211

28

24

159

N E W ( A L L ) R E I N S TAT E D

S p e c i a l C A S E S

SPECIALCASES

1,232 220 70 25CIVIL

CASESCRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


MANILA (LUZON)

MANILA (NCR)

MANILA (NCR)

CASE OUTPUT 2017BY DECISION

2,520 971 683 418SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

MANILA (NCR)

2,928 1,930 1,379 289SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


MANILA (LUZON)

460 189 80 23SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


MANILA (LUZON)

1,675 1,008 576 548SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

MANILA(NCR)

CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases



10,698

2,423

2,388

5,887

13,271

3,591

3,513

6,167

45%

40%

40%

48%

100%

88%

114%

116%

Total Case Output

2017

Pending Case as of Dec. 2017


Clearance Rate [2]

MANILA (NCR)

Criminal Cases

Civil Cases

Special Cases

TOTALCASEINPUT2017

23,969

6,014

5,901

12,054

3,901 1,860 1,387 206SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

CASELOAD STATISTICS BY GEOGRAPHICAL REGION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017(COURT OF APPEALS)

48 THE JUDICIARY ANNUAL REPORT2017

CEBUSTATION



CEBU STATION

Criminal Cases

Civil Cases

Special Cases

TOTALCASEINPUT2017

5,704

1,381

1,849

2,474

CEBU STATION

CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases

CASEINFLOW 1,846

533

419

894

68

10

11

47


CEBU STATION

CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases


1,841

479

503

859

3,863

902

1,346

1,615

32%

34%

27%

34%

100%

89%

120%

96%

Total Case Output

2017



Clearance Rate [2]



CAGAYANDE ORO STATION


805 646 193 241

CAGAYAN DE ORO STATION

Criminal Cases

Civil Cases

Special Cases

TOTALCASEINPUT2017

3,230

784

963

1,483


CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases

CASEINFLOW 1,282

337

312

633

63

13

5

45





CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases



1,640

321

495

824

1,590

463

468

659

51%

40%

51%

55%

128%

95%

158%

130%

Total Case Output

2017



Clearance Rate [2]


1,533 1,419 408 430SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

CEBU STATION

CEBU STATION

CEBU STATION


CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES





TOTAL

CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases

CASEINFLOW 13,006

3,595

2,818

6,593

342

51

40

251


TOTAL

Criminal Cases

Civil Cases

Special Cases

TOTALCASEINPUT2017

32,903

8,179

8,713

16,011



TOTAL

CriminalCases

CivilCases

SpecialCases



14,179

3,223

3,386

7,570

18,724

4,956

5,327

8,441

43%

39%

38%

47%

109%

89%

120%

114%

Total Case Output

2017



Clearance Rate [2]

TOTAL

SUMMARY OF CASES ACCORDING TO ORIGIN


RTCRTC

RTC

NLRCNLRC

NLRC

OTHER QUASI JUDICIAL AGENCIESOTHER QUASI JUDICIAL AGENCIES

OTHER QUASI JUDICIAL AGENCIES

TOTAL

CriminalCrimes Criminal

Crimes

CriminalCrimes


Crimes

CriminalCrimes


Crimes

CriminalCrimes

HeinousCrimes Heinous

Crimes

HeinousCrimes


Crimes

HeinousCrimes


Crimes

HeinousCrimes

CivilCases Civil

Cases

CivilCases

CivilCases Civil

Cases

CivilCases

CivilCases Civil

Cases

CivilCases

CASEINFLOW

3,367215

1,611

00

0

00

0

1,166100

1,297

00

0

00

0

5,855590

2,796

00

0

00

0










3,391647

622

3,655427

373

2,1214,248

1,253

13,006 342N E W R E I N S TAT E D

TOTAL CASE INPUT 2017

32,903


CASE OUTPUT 2017 BY DECISION

TOTAL

RTC

NLRC

Other Quasi Judicial Agencies



14,179

10,698

1,841

1,640

18,724

13,721

3,863

1,590

43%

45%

32%

51%

109%

100%

100%

128%

Total Case Output

2017

Pending CaseS as of

Dec. 2017


Clearance Rate [2]

TOTALTOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

9,1675,322

2,248

5,855590

2,796

3,367215

1,611

1,166100

1,297


TOTAL

TOTAL


TOTAL

9,167 5,855 3,367 1,166SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

2,254 590 215 100SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

5,316 2,796 1,611 1,297SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES

SPECIALCASES

CIVILCASES

CRIMINALCRIMES

HEINOUSCRIMES


TRO ONGOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT

Province of Cebu, represented by Hon. Hilario P. Davide III vs.Maningo Enterprises, represented by Engr. Margarito Maningo Jr.

ACCORDINGLY, the Court RESOLVES to GRANT petitioner’s application for a TRO, effective for a period of sixty (60) days from notice, restraining/enjoining the CIAC from issuing the Writ of Execution, and if such Writ of Execution has already been issued, to restrain/enjoin the sheriff or any person acting upon such order from implementing the said Writ, conditioned upon posting by petitioner of a bond in the sum of ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P100,000.00), within ten (10) days from notice, to answer for any damage which respondent may suffer by reason of this TRO. Petitioner’s failure to comply with the posting of the bond within the ten-day period shall result in the lifting of the restraining order. Respondent is DIRECTED, within ten (10) days from notice, to SHOW CAUSE why the application for a Writ of Preliminary Injunction should not be granted. SO ORDERED.

This Petition seeks the review and reversal of the March 18, 2017 Final Award, and Findings of the Construction Industry Arbitration Commission (CIAC) directing the petitioner Province of Cebu to pay respondent Pragmatice unpaid progress billings/collectibles arising from three (3) separate contracts to construct public school buildings, Senior Citizen’s Buildings and Bagsakan Center, with interests, attorney’s fees and the cost of the suit. Petitioner argued that the Award is contrary to facts, law and jurispudence and that the CIAC gravely erred.

CASE NO.

CASE TITLE

Nature of Case

DISPOSITION

TOTAL

Nineteenth Division, Court of Appeals Cebu Station

Filing Date Date of Promulgation

ResolutionCA-G.R.SP-10789

4/11/2017 7/28/2017

TRO GRANTED

1 SP CASE

ADJUDICATION OF CASES(SECOND LEVEL COURTS) PER JUDICIAL REGION

1ST JUDICIAL REGION

107,911

598,047

67,548

253,390

6,123

20,672

181,582 65,396 97% 36%116,186

872,109 229,627 91% 26%642,482

2ND JUDICIAL REGION

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)

CASE INPUT

CASE OUTPUT

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of

Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

3RD JUDICIAL REGION

4TH JUDICIAL REGION

5TH JUDICIAL REGION

TOTAL INPUT = Beginning Balance + Newly Filed/Raffled Cases + Revived/Reopened CasesTOTAL OUTPUT = (Decided/Resolved Cases + Archived Cases) - Total Adjustments

DISPOSITION RATE = (Total Output / Total Input) * 100 CLEARANCE RATE = (Total Output / Newly Filed Cases) * 100

26,594

8,831

381,929

96,602

28,619

9,022

110,991

25,912

47,007

14,426

Pending Beginning (1/1/17)17,006268,242 18,84077,80531,407 123,184

Newly Filed Cases8,782105,177 8,77730,65813,874 43,086

Revived/Reopened Cases8068,510 1,0022,5281,726 2,448

168,718

38,411

Pending Cases as of December 31, 201717,763285,327 19,59785,07932,581 130,307

CLEARANCE RATE101%92% 103%85%104% 89%

DISPOSITION RATE33%25% 32%23%31% 23%

L U Z O N

REGIONALTRIAL COURT

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION


35,998

17,269

111,103

57,836

13,420

6,334

41,542

21,788

1,046

793

2,847

1,008

50,464

24,396

10,950

5,600

82%

88%

22%

23%

39,514

18,796

155,492

80,632

29,945

13,395

72%

61%

19%

17%

125,547

67,237

9TH JUDICIAL REGION

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)

CASE INPUT

CASE OUTPUT

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of D

ecem

ber 3

1, 20

17

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

10TH JUDICIAL REGION




Newly Filed Cases6,651 5,45313,94339,123 13,076

Revived/Reopened Cases440 4501,1463,192 1,156

Pending Cases as of December 31, 201721,970 19,28532,889115,422 41,278

CLEARANCE RATE96% 112%80%96% 107%

DISPOSITION RATE23% 24%25%25% 25%

M I N D A N A O

V I S A Y A S

7 t h J u d i c i a l R e g i o n



28,352 25,37044,060153,106 55,324

6,382 6,08511,17137,684 14,046

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OUT

PUT

49,752

49,752

62,212

62,212

10,444

10,444

122,408 73,255 118% 60%49,153

122,408 73,255 118% 60%49,153

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of

Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATEMETROPOLITAN

TRIAL COURT

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as o

f Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

MUNICIPALTRIAL COURTS

IN CITIES

65,984

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

4,302

1,721

9,754

13,942

2,464

32,183


IN CITIES

73,594

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

4,741

1,504

6,875

12,512

2,971

28,603


IN CITIES

148,655

1ST JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

9,885

64,787 2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

3,369

17,919

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

27,967

5,647


IN CITIES

9,077

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

842

144

1,290

1,513

212

4,001MUNICIPAL

TRIAL COURTSIN CITIES

83,974

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

6,486

1,964

8,773

13,438

3,057

33,718


IN CITIES

64,681

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

3,399

1,405

9,146

14,529

2,520

31,069


IN CITIES

56%

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

66%

58%

49%

48%

54%

52%


IN CITIES

114%

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

137%

131%

128%

107%

103%

118%


New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)


CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OUT

PUT

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as o

f Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

4,551

1,939

16,480

9,990

4,864

1,522

20,555

14,169

881

146

2,321

1,294

10,296

3,607

6,593

1,739

136%

114%

64%

48%

3,703

1,868

39,356

25,453

23,878

15,546

116%

110%

61%

61%

15,478

9,907Pe

ndin

g Be

ginn

ing

(1/1

/17)

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of D

ecem

ber 3

1, 20

17

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

V I S A Y A S




9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

2,340

4,877

8,807

1,297

17,321

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

6,302

11,324

5,778

1,032

24,436

9TH JUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

8,914

44,512 10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

17,554

15,484 12THJUDICIALREGION

2,560

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

4,228

4,891

8,050

965

18,134

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

4,686

12,663

7,434

1,595

26,378

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

74%

112%

129%

155%

108%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

53%

72%

48%

62%

59%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

272

1,353

899

231

2,755


New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)30,391 22,238 2,343 54,972 27,113 122% 49%27,859

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1/

1/17

)

CASE INPUT

CASE OUTPUT

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of

Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

DISPOSITION RATE

3,037

1,570

52%

46,966

22,888

49%

3,779

1,305

35%

16,307

6,787

42%

7,679

4,514

59%


Newly Filed Cases1,33318,751 1,2385,0393,796 7,345

Revived/Reopened Cases1121,961 102540602 605

16,164

8,712

Pending Cases as of December 31, 20171,46724,078 2,4749,5203,165 7,452

CLEARANCE RATE118%122% 105%135%119% 119%

54%

1ST JUDICIAL REGION

2ND JUDICIAL REGION

3RD JUDICIAL REGION

4TH JUDICIAL REGION

5TH JUDICIAL REGIONL U Z O N

M U N I C I P A LT R I A L C O U R T

TOTAL INPUT = Beginning Balance + Newly Filed/Raffled Cases + Revived/Reopened CasesTOTAL OUTPUT = (Decided/Resolved Cases + Archived Cases) - Total Adjustments

DISPOSITION RATE = (Total Output / Total Input) * 100 CLEARANCE RATE = (Total Output / Newly Filed Cases) * 100


724

969

2,471

778

804

677

1,963

482

165

86

271

20

1,693

1,732

1,098

810

137%

120%

65%

47%

595

922

4,705

1,280

2,442

534

124%

111%

52%

42%

2,263

746Pe

ndin

g Be

ginn

ing

(1/1

/17)

CASE INPUT

CASE OUTPUT

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of D

ecem

ber 3

1, 20

17

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

Pending Beginning (1/1/17)266268,242 4073951,666 598

Newly Filed Cases271 2714331,524 549

Revived/Reopened Cases10 1918111 64

547 697846 1,211

312 291501 679

Pending Cases as of December 31, 2017235 4063451,518 532

CLEARANCE RATE115% 107%116%117% 124%

DISPOSITION RATE57% 42%59%54% 56%

9TH JUDICIAL REGION



12TH JUDICIAL REGIONM I N D A N A O

V I S A Y A S




3,301

1,783

Pend

ing

Case

s as o

f Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OUT

PUT

26,350 22,091 1,929 50,370 25,936 117% 51%24,434

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of

Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT

MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL

COURT

26,350

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

1,694

2,166

3,406

3,664

1,962

12,892


COURT

22,091

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

1,840

1,948

3,039

2,844

1,277

10,948


COURT

50,370

1ST JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

3,695

24,934 2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4,258

6,771

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

6,872

3,338


COURT

1,929

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

161

144

326

364

99

1,094


COURT

25,936

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

2,093

2,133

3,333

4,236

1,373

13,168


COURT

24,434

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

1,602

2,125

3,438

2,636

1,965

11,766


COURT

51%

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

57%

50%

49%

62%

41%

53%


COURT

117%

1ST JUDICIALREGION

2ND JUDICIALREGION

3RD JUDICIALREGION

4TH JUDICIALREGION

5TH JUDICIALREGION

L U Z O N

114%

109%

110%

149%

108%

120%


DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE


Pend

ing

Case

s as o

f Dec

embe

r 31,

2017

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OUT

PUT

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

1,907

1,518

6,466

3,041

2,671

1,076

6,012

2,265

150

114

359

95

4,728

2,708

2,807

1,073

105%

100%

59%

40%

1,922

1,638

12,837

5,401

6,211

2,331

103%

103%

48%

43%

6,638

3,078Pe

ndin

g Be

ginn

ing

(1/1

/17)

CASE

INPU

T

CASE

OU

TPU

T

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Revi

ved/

Reop

ened

Cas

es

Pend

ing

Case

s as

of D

ecem

ber 3

1, 20

17

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

V I S A Y A S




9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

1,462

1,778

2,619

1,133

6,992

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

1,032

1,808

1,492

799


M I N D A N A O

2,542


11TH JUDICIALREGION

3,787

4,212 12THJUDICIALREGION

2,058

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

1,472

1,466

2,022

1,082

6,042

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

1,070

2,321

2,190

976

6,557

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

104%

128%

147%

122%

128%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

42%

61%

52%

47%

52%9TH JUDICIAL

REGION

10TH JUDICIALREGION

11TH JUDICIALREGION

12THJUDICIALREGION

M I N D A N A O

48

201

101

126

476


DIS

POSI

TIO

N R

ATE

New

ly F

iled

Case

s

Pend

ing

Begi

nnin

g (1

/1/1

7)

CLEA

RAN

CE R

ATE

SHARIA DISTRICT COURT

85

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

16

69


116

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

14

102


150

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

21

129

SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT

1,732

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

595

1,137


34

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

7

27

SHARIA CIRCUITCOURT

698

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

178

520


1,034

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

417

617


23%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

33%

21%


54%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

175%

46%


40%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

30%

46%


82%

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

82%

82%

SHARIA CIRCUITCOURT

859

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

372

487


63

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

4

59


2

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

1

1

SHARIA CIRCUITCOURT

854

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

216

638

SHARIA CIRCUITCOURT

19

9TH JUDICIALREGION

12TH JUDICIALREGION

7

12

Pending Beginning (1/1/17)

Newly Filed Cases Revived/Reopened Cases

CASE INPUT CASE OUTPUT

Pending Cases as of Dec. 31, 2017

CLEARANCE RATE DISPOSITION RATE

ADJUDICATION OFJUDICIAL CASES

(SHARIA DISTRICT COURT AND SHARIA CIRCUIT COURT)


VICE PRESIDENTIALELECTORAL PROTEST

Output 2017

265

9

-

[Note: Revision proceedings commenced on April 2, 2018]

Number of pleadings filed and acted upon

Number of case disposals

Percentage of contested ballot boxes reviewed and appreciated before expiration of the term of office contested

SIGNIFICANT ORDERS/RESOLUTIONS(a) January 24, 2017 – Protestee’s Verified Answer with Special and Affirmative Defenses and Counter-Protest NOTED;

(b) March 21, 2017 – Identified the cash deposits due the parties and the dates when they are to be paid;

(c) April 25, 2017- Preliminary Conference Briefs required to be submitted; protestee directed to pay the first installment of the cash deposit as stated in the resolution datedMarch 21, 2017;

(d) June 6, 2017 – Panel of three (3) PET Commissioners constituted; resetting of preliminary conference fromJune 21, 2017 to July 11, 2017;

(e) July 11, 2017 – Preliminary Conference Order;

(f) August 29, 2017 – Protestant’s first cause of action (for the annulment of Vice President’s proclamation) was dismissed, among others;

(g) October 10, 2017 – Precautionary Protection Order (PPO) lifted for precints (45,751) not covered by proceed with decryption and printing of ballot images;

(h) October 18, 2017 - Tribunal resolved to amend Rule 39(b) of the 2010 PET Rules; directed the hiring of the Revision Committee members; and

(i) December 5, 2017 – Tribunal authorized retrieval of ballots for Camarines Sur.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS AGAINSTSUPREME COURT PERSONNEL

D i s c l i p i n a r y C a s e s

N O N - D i s c l i p i n a r y C a s e s

Immediate Termination of Casual Employment

Dropped from the rolls due to AWOL

Suspended andReprimanded

Suspended

Reprimanded

Suspended with Warning

Severely Reprimanded with Warning

2

1

1

2

31

2

5

6

16TOTAL

TOTALBased on the January-December 2017 statistics provided by the SC – Office of Administrative Services


ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSAGAINST JUSTICES

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSAGAINST PERSONNEL OF THIRD LEVEL COURTS

Court of Appeals

Court of Appeals

Sandiganbayan

Sandiganbayan

Court of Tax Appeals

Court of Tax Appeals

TOTAL

TOTAL

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

2

0

4

0

7

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

4

0

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

Ad

mo

nish

edA

dm

oni

shed

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Cen

sure

dC

ensu

red

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ceD

ism

isse

d F

rom

Ser

vice

Fin

edF

ined

Sus

pen

ded

Sus

pen

ded

Rep

rim

and

edR

epri

man

ded

Tota

lTo

tal

* Case output includes decided cases that were filed before December 31, 2016** Per records received for the year 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSAGAINST LOWER COURT JUDGES

11

18

3

7

0

0

3

12

32

73

5

42

1

112

55

264

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

1

0

4

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

15

0

0

0

1

0

2

0

1

0

0

0

24

0

2

0

6

18

3

7

0

0

1

12

17

73

2

39

0

111

29

260

Ad

mo

nish

edA

dm

oni

shed

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Cen

sure

dC

ensu

red

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ceD

ism

isse

d F

rom

Ser

vice

Fin

edF

ined

Sus

pen

ded

Sus

pen

ded

Rep

rim

and

edR

epri

man

ded

Tota

lTo

tal

SECOND LEVEL COURTS [RTC]

FIRST and SECOND LEVEL COURTS

FIRST LEVEL COURTS[MeTC / MTCC / MTC / MCTC]

SHARI’A DISTRICT COURT [SDC]

SHARI’A DISTRICT COURTS [SDC]

SHARI’A CIRCUIT COURT [SCC]

SHARI’A CIRCUIT COURTS [SCC]

HALL OF JUSTICE

TOTAL

TOTAL

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS AGAINSTPERSONNEL OF THE FIRST AND SECOND LEVEL COURTS INCLUDING SHARI’A COURTS

* Case output includes decided cases that were filed before December 31, 2016** Per records received for the year 2017


ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSACCORDING TO JUDICIAL REGION

6

5

3

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

Ad

mo

nish

edA

dm

oni

shed

3

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cen

sure

dC

ensu

red

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ceD

ism

isse

d F

rom

Ser

vice

17

15

1

1

0

1

1

2

1

0

0

1

1

0

3

2

2

1

4

1

1

2

0

0

0

0

3

4

Fin

edF

ined

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1S

usp

end

edS

usp

end

ed

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Rep

rim

and

edR

epri

man

ded

29

24

6

5

0

1

1

3

1

1

0

1

1

0

4

2

3

1

4

1

4

3

0

0

0

0

5

6

Tota

lTo

tal

SEC

ON

D L

EVEL

CO

URT

JU

DG

ESFI

RST

LEV

EL

COU

RT J

UD

GES

NCR

NCR

1

1

7

7

4

4

2

2

8

8

5

5

3

3

9

9

10

10

11

11

12

12

6

6

TOTAL

TOTAL

* Case output includes decided cases that were filed before December 31, 2016** Per records received for the year 2017SOURCE: Docket and Clearance Division, Legal Office, OCA


18

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

0

0

Ad

mo

nish

edA

dm

oni

shed

Ad

mo

nish

ed

7

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

3

0

0

0

0

0

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Cen

sure

dC

ensu

red

Cen

sure

d

12

0

0

1

0

0

2

0

0

1

0

3

0

0

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ceD

ism

isse

d F

rom

Ser

vice

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ce

73

0

0

22

0

0

8

0

0

6

1

2

0

0

3

4

1

0

8

3

2

13

0

0

Fin

edF

ined

Fin

ed

39

2

3

2

0

0

0

0

0

5

1

4

1

0

1

3

1

3

3

1

0

15

1

3

Sus

pen

ded

Sus

pen

ded

Sus

pen

ded

111

0

1

21

0

0

4

0

0

6

2

6

0

1

5

3

2

2

2

0

1

57

0

0

Rep

rim

and

edR

epri

man

ded

Rep

rim

and

ed

260

2

4

51

0

0

15

0

0

19

4

18

1

1

12

11

5

7

16

4

3

95

1

3

Tota

lTo

tal

Tota

l

FIR

ST a

nd S

ECO

ND

LEV

EL

COU

RT P

ERSO

NN

ELSH

AR

I’AC

OU

RT J

UD

GES

SHA

RI’A

CO

URT

PER

SON

NEL

NCR

9

9

1

10

10

7

4

2

11

11

8

5

3

12

12

9101112

6

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL


ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONSACCORDING TO GEOGRAPHICAL REGION

6

5

0

0

1

Ad

mo

nish

ed

3

3

0

0

0

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

0

0

0

0

0

Cen

sure

d1

1

0

0

0

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ce

17

4

2

8

3

Fin

ed

2

0

0

1

1

Sus

pen

ded

0

0

0

0

0

Rep

rim

and

ed

29

13

2

9

5

Tota

l

SEC

ON

D L

EV

EL

CO

URT

JU

DG

ES NCR

LUZON

VISAYAS

MINDANAO

TOTAL

5

4

0

0

1

Ad

mo

nish

ed

0

0

0

0

0

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

0

0

0

0

0

Cen

sure

d

2

0

1

1

0D

ism

isse

d F

rom

Ser

vice

15

6

2

3

4

Fin

ed

1

0

0

0

1

Sus

pen

ded

1

1

0

0

0

Rep

rim

and

ed

24

11

3

4

6

Tota

l

FIR

ST L

EV

EL

CO

URT

JU

DG

ES NCR

LUZON

VISAYAS

MINDANAO

TOTAL

18

8

1

0

9

Ad

mo

nish

ed

7

4

2

1

0

Ben

efits

Fo

rfei

ted

0

0

0

0

0

Cen

sure

d

12

7

2

2

1

Dis

mis

sed

Fro

m S

ervi

ce

73

41

12

7

13

Fin

ed

39

10

7

7

15

Sus

pen

ded

111

35

11

8

57

Rep

rim

and

ed

260

105

35

25

95

Tota

l

FIR

ST a

nd S

EC

ON

D L

EV

EL

CO

URT

PER

SON

NEL NCR

LUZON

VISAYAS

MINDANAO

TOTAL

Disbarred

Reprimanded

Admonished

Censured

Fined andWarned

Fined

Suspended from the Practice of Law and

Notarial Commission

Suspendedfrom thePractice of Law

Suspended Notarial Commission

Fined and Reprimanded

Fined and Admonished

Warned

TOTAL

OrderedArrested

DISCIPLINARY CASESAGAINST LAWYERS

4

9

1

50

47

0

0

151

21

9

0

5

0

5

Based on the January-December 2017 statistics provided by the Office of the Bar Confidant



2017 BARSTATISTICS

Source: Office of the Bar Confidant, Supreme Court of the Philippines

Admitted to take the Bar

TOTA

L 7,227

TOTA

LTO

TAL

PER

CEN

TAG

EPE

RC

ENTA

GE

Examinees Who CompletedAll Four Sundays

S u c c e s s f u l E x a m i n e e s

6,748

1,724

93.33%

25.5%

TOTA

L

TOTA

LTO

TAL

PER

CEN

TAG

E

PER

CEN

TAG

EPE

RC

ENTA

GE

Examinees Who Showed Upfor the First Sunday

FIRST TIME TAKERS REPEATERS

6,759

3,0783,681

93.52%

45.53%54.46%

SUPR

EME

COUR

T &

LOW

ER C

OURT

S

COUR

T OF

APP

EALS

COUR

T OF

TAX

APP

EALS*Multi-Year

Obligation Project

In thousands

TotalProject Cost

Proposed

Granted

Increase/ Decrease

Utilized

Remarks

On

hold

; Wai

ting

for

final

pro

ject

site

Ong

oing

; Pro

cure

men

t of

DA

ED; R

e-bi

ddin

g of

pr

ocur

emen

t of

pro

ject

man

ager

Ong

oing

; Pro

cure

men

t of

DA

ED

On

hold

; Wai

ting

for

final

pr

ojec

t si

te

Ong

oing

; Bid

ding

NO

TE:

2017

GA

A in

crea

sed

the

budg

et a

lloca

tion

to a

llow

fo

r th

e co

nstr

uctio

n of

a

4-st

orey

bui

ldin

g, in

stea

dof

3 s

tore

ys

1,021,796

418,720

0

418,720

310,202

31,621

0

31,621

367,763

54,502

0

54,502

778,669

407,517

0

407,517

19,942

19,942

10,058

30,000

217,056

0

NA

NA

NA

42,888

42,888

5,400

48,288

48,288

32,000

32,000

10,888

10,888

(Additional Funding Requirements)

2018 BUDGET

Proposed

Granted 92,419 170,513 202,154

92,419 170,513 202,154

2017

BU

DG

ET

FOR

HA

LLS

OF

JUST

ICE

Cebu

City

Hal

l of J

ustic

e (J

udic

ial C

ompl

ex)*

Laoa

g Ci

ty*

Man

daue

City

*

Caga

yan

De

Oro

City

*

Cons

truc

tion

of a

3-s

tore

y Bu

ildin

g

SAN

DIG

AN

BAYA

N

Sand

igan

baya

n Bu

ildin

g II

Sten

o O

ffice

Con

stru

ctio

n

CTA

Bui

ldin

g III


PROP

OSED

GRAN

TED

San Juan City

Mauban, Quezon

Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro

Iligan City, Lanao Del Norte

Wao, Lanao Del Sur

Rapu-Rapu, Albay

Tanay, Rizal

Roxas, Palawan

Dumangas, Iloilo

Masbate, Masbate

Naujan, Oriental Mindoro

Puerto Prinsesa, Palawan

Flora, Apayao

SUPREME COURT & LOWER COURTS

Calapan, Oriental Mindoro - Building 2

Compostella, Compostella Valley

Ramon Magsaysay, Zamboanga Del Sur

Tabuk, Kalinga (Completion of Bldg. 2)

100,000

20,000

15,000

156,217

30,000

15,000

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

11,968

60,460

60,105

10,774

7,500

100,000

20,000

15,000

156,217

30,000

15,000

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

11,968

60,460

60,105

10,774

7,500

100,000

20,000

15,000

156,217

30,000

15,000

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

7,500

11,968

60,460

60,105

10,774

7,500

2018 REPORTON BUDGETFOR HALLSOF JUSTICE

In thousands

TOTA

L PR

OJEC

T CO

ST

COMPLETED BUDGETFOR HALLS OF JUSTICE

REGION IREGION IV-AREGION IV-B

REGION VIREGION VIIIREGION XREGION XIREGION XIICARAGA

TOTAL

2016

php 6,069,185.99

php 3,017,342.59

PHP 5,383,592.60

PHP 3,028,870.35

php 17,498,991.53

PHP 2,698,000.00

php 3,147,863.00

PHP 6,073,308.45

PHP 5,859,217.92

php 13,942,303.28

PHP 12,121,787.71

Php 6,050,009.65

php 2,998,452.41

php 52,890,942.42

2017

REGION I

REGION IV-A

REGION IV-B

REGION VI

REGION VIII

REGION X

REGION XI

REGION XII

CARAGA

TOTAL

REGION XI

REGION XII

CARAGA

TOTAL


ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTPHILIPPINE JUDICIAL ACADEMY

MALE TOTAL TPAs

TOTAL TPAs

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

FEMALE

COR

E PR

OG

RA

MS

COR

E PR

OG

RA

MS

COR

E PR

OG

RA

MS

COR

E PR

OG

RA

MS

TOTA

L

TOTA

L

TOTA

L TOTA

L

CON

VEN

TIO

NS

AN

D S

EMIN

AR

S

CON

VEN

TIO

NS

AN

D S

EMIN

AR

S

CON

VEN

TIO

NS

AN

D S

EMIN

AR

S

CON

VEN

TIO

NS

AN

D S

EMIN

AR

S

SPEC

IAL

FOC

US

PRO

GR

AM

S

SPEC

IAL

FOC

US

PRO

GR

AM

S

SPEC

IAL

FOC

US

PRO

GR

AM

S

SPEC

IAL

FOC

US

PRO

GR

AM

S

MED

IATI

ON

PRO

GR

AM

s

MED

IATI

ON

PRO

GR

AM

s

MED

IATI

ON

PRO

GR

AM

s

MED

IATI

ON

PRO

GR

AM

s

OTH

ERPR

OG

RA

MS

OTH

ERPR

OG

RA

MS

OTH

ERPR

OG

RA

MS O

THER

PRO

GR

AM

S

874 1,338 3,355

871

1,745 4,251 7,486 1,363 3,188 18,033

2,913 4,131 709 1,229 9,853

654 1,959 8,180 29

34 21 145

7 54

HIGHLIGHTS

PUBLICATIONS

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION(ADR) SERVICES PROVIDED

FACILITY SERVICES(PHILJA TRAINING CENTER)

• 145 Training Program and Activities (TPAs) conducted, exceeding the targeted 67 (216 %)

• 4 issues of PHILJA Bulletin• 12 issues of Electronic Alerts• 130 copies of 2015 PHILJA Annual Report• 3 issues of PHILJA Judicial Journal (completion of layout and review) and editing of PHILJA Judicial Journal on Drugs Law (230 pages) and International Criminal Court (161 pages)• 1 issue of 2016 PHILJA Annual Report (completion of layout and content)

• 3 Court Annexed Mediation Units established (Davao Oriental, Compostela Valley and Abra) exceeding the targeted 2 (150%)• 6 Judicial Dispute Resolution sites declared (Misamis Occidental, Lanao del Norte, Bukidnon, South Cotabato, Sarangani and General Santos) exceeding the targeted 4 (150%)• 62% of total mediated cases settled via CAM, exceeding the targeted 56%

• 63,626 Venue and Accommodation Services rendered, exceeding the targeted 6,000 • 14,335 Maintenance and Operations of Property, Plant and Equipment rendered, exceeding the targeted 5,050• 8,677 Administrative Support Services rendered, exceeding the targeted 750

SOURCE: Office Performance Commitment and Review as of March 28, 2018

• 48`TPAs conducted in partnership with Development Partners

• Updating, relayout and redesign of the PHILJA: An Introduction and Supplement• International Conference on the Training of the Judiciary Programs in English, French and Spanish (156 pages) and program cover with packets (2 spreads)• 2018 PHILJA Flip and Desk Calendars

PMCO’SADR PROGRAMS

JUDICIAL ANDBAR COUNCIL

With CAM & JDR

With CAM only

No CAM & JDR

From the existing 135 PMC Units as of 2016, additional3 PMC Units (Davao Oriental, Compostela Valley, and Abra)were established in 2017.

With Nominations Pending in the Office of the President (OP) 135

193

29

6

0

0

106

0

469

With Insufficient Applications

With Sufficient Applications (Being Processed)

Recently Opened

For Transmittal to the OP

For First Deliberation

With Sufficient Applications (Deferred)

Existing Vacancies

Forthcoming Vacancies

21,497 out of 37,024 CASES SUCCESSFULLY MEDIATED

2,693 out of 8,292 CASESSUCCESSFULLY MEDIATED

44 out of 190 CASESSUCCESSFULLY MEDIATED

COVERAGE

STATUS

TOTal

58%

92% 138 81 367% 50 728 245

33%

23%

SUCC

ESS

RATE

of courtshave CAM

of courtshave JDR

existingPMC Units

existingJDR sites

existingACM Units

PMC UnitStaff

accredited mediators

in ACM

accredited mediators in CAM/ MCAM

CAM &MCAM

JDR

ACM


MANDATORY CONTINUINGLEGAL EDUCATION OFFICE (MCLEO)

SMALLCLAIMS COURT

CONTINUOUSTRIAL SYSTEM

ENHANCED JUSTICE ON WHEELS (EJOW)

AUTOMATEDHEARING SYSTEM

JANUARY

14

JULY

52

FEBRUARY

43

AUGUST

37

MARCH

35

SEPTEMBER

55

APRIL

21

OCTOBER

67

MAY

51

NOVEMBER

56

JUNE

31

DECEMBER

26

TOTAL

488

MCLEOactivities/seminars conducted

Based on the applications to conduct MCLEO activity filed by accreditedMCLEO Providers and approved by the MCLEO Governing Board.

*Equipment provided are part of the lease program of the Court.

No. of successful mediation cases

89 378 264No. of promulgated

decisions

September to December 2017 210,113

8,971

10,335

1,209

10,118

428

41

14,324

4,864

4,534

1,085

5,742

346

51

January 2018

February 2018

March 2018

April 2018

May 2018

June 2018

No. of inmates released

Phase 1 – Original Covered Courts

(Quezon City, Makati, Pasig,Mandaluyong, Manila, Lapu-Lapu,

Angeles [including Clark],Tacloban, Davao and Cebu)

Provision of Automated Hearing Room Equipment has been increased to cover the whole National Capital Judicial Region and Region IV-A whichincreased the number of courts that have AHR equipment to 595.

(Caloocan, Las Piñas, Malabon,Marikina, Muntinlupa, Navotas,

Parañaque, Pasay, Taguig, Valenzuela,and CALABARZON)

Phase 2 – Additional Courts*

281 314

CLEARANCERATE

83.88%20,234 CASE INPUT

16,973 CASE OUTPUT

CASE OUTPUTCASE INPUT


HON. ALEXANDER G. GESMUNDOAssociate Justice

Committee Chairperson

ATTY. THEODORE O. TEChief, Public Information OfficeCommittee Vice-Chairperson

HON. ROMEO F. BARZAPresiding Justice, Court of Appeals

Member

HON. ROMAN G. DEL ROSARIOPresiding Justice, Court of Appeals

Member

HON. AMPARO M. CABOTAJE-TANG Presiding Justice, Sandiganbayan

MemberHON. KARL B. MIRANDA

Associate Justice, Sandiganbayan and Chair,Judiciary-Wide Committee on Data Reconciliation

MemberHON. JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ

Court AdministratorMember

HON. RAUL BAUTISTA VILLANUEVADeputy Court Administrator and Chair,Judiciary-Wide Committee on Budget

MemberHON. JENNY LIND ALDECOA-DELORINO

Deputy Court AdministratorMember

ATTY. FELIPA B. ANAMAClerk of Court En Banc

Member

ATTY. ANNA-LI R. PAPA-GOMBIODeputy Clerk of Court En Banc

Member

ATTY. JILLIANE JOYCE R. DE DUMOOffice of the Chief Justice

Member

ATTY. CYD KRISTINE DAPHNE S. LIBUTAN-DUEÑASPublic Information Office

Committee Secretariat

MS. HELEN GRACE D. SANTOSPublic Information Office

Committee Secretariat

Members of the SpecialJudiciary-Wide Committee on THE Annual Report

HON. KARL B. MIRANDAAssociate Justice, Sandiganbayan

and Chairperson, Judiciary-Wide Committee on Data Reconciliation TWG Chairperson

ATTY. THEODORE O. TEAssistant Court Administrator and Chief, Public Information Office

Supreme CourtWorking Chairperson

HON. RAUL BAUTISTA VILLANUEVADeputy Court Administrator and Chairperson,

Judiciary-Wide Committee on BudgetMember

ATTY. ANNA-LI R. PAPA-GOMBIODeputy Clerk of Court En Banc, Supreme Court

Member

ATTY. ANITA JAMERLAN-REYAssistant Clerk of Court, Court of Appeals

Member

ATTY. JASON T. LORENZODirector III, Office of the Legal Research and Technical Staff, Sandiganbayan

Member

ATTY. DAN B. FERNANDOExecutive Clerk of Court IV, Court of Tax Appeals

Member

DIR. ELSIE R. TIAUZON-FORTEZAChief of Office, Office of Administrative and Finance Services

Court of Tax AppealsMember

ATTY. MARIA VICTORIA GLEORESTY SP. GUERRADirector IV and Assistant Chief of Office

Public Information Office, Supreme CourtMember

MR. JAY B. REMPILLOSC Chief Judicial Staff Officer

Public Information Office, Supreme CourtMember

MS. CHARITO C. CRUZ-ROJASStatistician III

Statistical Reports Division, Court Management Office, Office of the Court Administrator (CMO-OCA)

Member

MR. ERWIN D. OCSONStatistician III

Statistical Reports Division, CMO-OCAMember

MS. MA. NORIE E. BALUBARStatistician II


MR. RYAN B. CARDINALStatistician II


ATTY. CYD KRISTINE DAPHNE S. LIBUTAN-DUEÑASPublic Information Office

TWG Secretariat

MS. HELEN GRACE D. SANTOSPublic Information Office

TWG Secretariat

MR. JOSEPH L. ALBACITEDesign and Layout Artist

Members of the Technical Working Group (TWG) for the Special Judiciary-Wide Committee on THE Annual ReportENTERPRISE INFORMATION

SYSTEMS PLAN

OPERATIONAL

CONTRACT AWARDED INSTALLED

ONGOING DELIVERY & INSTALLATION

FOR PROCUREMENT

Judiciary Data Center Supreme Court (JDC)Disaster Recovery Site Angeles City (DR Site)

Legal ResourceManagement

Judiciary I.T. Infrastructure Phase 1

Systems Integration Services– Phase 1 Lot 1 & 2

Hearing Management System

JudiciaryEmail System

Leasing of I.T. Equipment

Purchase of I.T. Equipment

Lawyer Information System

Regional DataCenters

Judiciary I.T. Infrastructure Phase 2

Enterprise Resource Planning System (ERP)

Judiciary PortalSystem

ePHILJASystem

Documents, Records and Archiving

Management System(DREAMS)

MISO Re-Engineering

Development Plan

MISO Process Modernization Program

e-Courts

Digitization ofCourt Records

Systems Integration Services – Phase 2


THE

2017


THE

2017

Date post:	02-Dec-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times