Date post: | 31-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | brielle-nobles |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in stroke prevention
Dr Sepehr ShakibDirector
Clinical PharmacologyRoyal Adelaide Hospital
Topics
• Stroke basics
• Risk calculators
• Lipids and strokes
• Antiplatelets– Clopidogrel– Aspirin + dipyridamole
• Warfarin for AF
What are the different types of strokes?
• Ischemic– Lacunar– Thrombotic– Cardioembolic– Watershed
• Hemorrhagic
Ischemic strokes
• Lacunar:– Occlusion of deep penetrating branches of
arteries– Occlusion caused by microatheroma,
lipohyalinosis, hypertension changes– Most caused by hypertension– Account for 20% of all ischemic strokes
Lacunar stroke
Ischemic strokes
• Cardioembolic– Strokes from other parts of the vascular tree eg
atrial fibrillation, recent MIs, endocarditis, aortic arch etc…
– Some caused by lipid accumulation
• Thrombotic strokes– Due to development of thrombosis and occlusion
of blood vessels supplying brain eg middle cerebral artery
Middle cerebral artery stroke
Hemorrhagic strokes
• Much more rare and more catastrophic
• Caused by:– Hypertension– Amyloid angiopathy– Aneurysms
Hemorrhagic stroke
Hemorrhagic transformation
• Development of hemorrhage in large ischemic stroke
Risk calculators: http://www.cvdcheck.org.au/
Risk
• 52 years old
• Bp 142/87
• Family history of IHD
• LDL 6.4, HDL 0.8
• Has just stopped
smoking
Risk Engine
Based on UKPDS follow-up data
Relationship between lipids and strokes
• BMJ June 2003
Stroke reduction for 1mmol/L reduction in LDL cohort studies
15% reduction in ischemic strokes
19% increase in hemorrhagic strokes
Association between lipids and strokes summary
• As your LDL falls ischemic strokes
– ↑ hemorrhagic strokesOverall benefit depends on the relative balance of
absolute risks of ischemic vs hemorrhagic strokes
• Even with ischemic strokes get smaller relative reduction in events than IHD– Cf 32% (95% CI 27-36%) reduction in ischemic heart
disease events for every 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL
Benefits of lipid lowering in trials
• Original evidence from IHD trials– Eg reduction in strokes in 4S and LIPID study
• Heart Protection Study first study to demonstrate reduction in strokes in those without IHD (Lancet 2002)– 25% reduction in all strokes
Aspirin
• Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration
• BMJ 2002• 287 studies involving
205,000 patients!• Most placebo
controlled data related to aspirin
Relative Benefit
Absolute benefit
Benefits in other vascular events
What about risk of bleeding?
GI bleeding
• Meta-analysis 24 RCTs with 66,000 patients
• 0.45% annual bleeding rate
• OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.51-1.88)
Hemorrhagic stroke risk
• 16 trials, 66542 patients
• 108 hemorrhagic strokes
• Risk 0.05% per year
What about dose of aspirin- efficacy
“There remains uncertainty about such low doses (<75mg) are as effective”
Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration
Dose of aspirin- toxicity?
• Opinion quite varied from there being no dose dependency to there being one
• No direct comparison of doses
• Small adverse event rate
• Differences in background populations in different studies
Am J Cardiol 2005
• 31 trials
• 192,036 patients
• Looked at low (<100mg), moderate (1-200mg) and high dose (>200)
Bleeding risk
There appears to be dose dependencyToxicity is substantial even at low dose
Aspirin summary
• Effective at reducing rate of recurrent stroke
• Even small doses associated with risk of bleeding– Mainly GI bleeding but some intracerebral
• Benefit outweighs risk in patients with previous stroke
• There appears to be increased toxicity at increased doses
Aspirin Questions?
Clopidogrel
• CAPRIE study
• Clopidogrel 75mg vs aspirin 325mg
• History of stroke, MI, or peripheral vascular disease
• 19,185 patients
Clopidogrel efficacy
5.8%
5.3%
Clopidogrel toxicity
* p<.05
Aspirin + Dipyridamole
• Antithrombotic Trialists Collaboration 2002– 6% non-significant reduction in strokes with
addition of dipyridamole to aspirin– Systematic review of 25 studies, involving
10,404 patients
ESPRIT study
• 2700 patients randomised to any dose of aspirin +dipyridamole SR 200mg twice daily
• Open label
Esprit results
• Fewer strokes with aspirin + dipyridamole
• Fewer hemorrhages with aspirin + dipyridamole (??)
• Systematic review of 6 studies shows reduction in recurrent events
Antiplatelet therapy
Which is the ideal antiplatelet?
• Stroke 2008 meta-analysis: addition of dipyridamole to aspirin: ‘robust benefit’
• Editorial: “…considering the 40 times difference in cost and the discrepancies noted above, such benefit is uncertain and, judging by the data, far from robust”
What about aspirin+dipyridamole compared to clopidogrel?
PROFESS
• Recent ischemic strokes
• Randomised to clopidogrel or asa+dip
• 20,000 patients for 2.5 years
• Non-inferiority design
Primary outcome- recurrent stroke
Hazard Ratio for Aspirin–ERDP 1.01 (0.92–1.11)
Safety outcomes
Other safety
Antithrombotic options
Drug Efficacy Adverse effects
Aspirin 22% in risk Bleeding risk
(0.5-1% per year)
Aspirin + dipyridamole
? more effective than aspirin
Headaches, nausea, flushing
Clopidogrel Slightly more effective than aspirin
Similar bleeding to aspirin
Warfarin Same as aspirin More bleeding
Aspirin + Clopidogrel
Same as aspirin More bleeding
Antiplatelet key messages
• Aspirin is antithrombotic of choice in primary stroke prevention when CV risk is high
• Aspirin, aspirin+dipyridamole or clopidogrel are main antiplatelet cfhoices in secondary stroke prevention– Choice depends on circumstances (PBS
criteria, intolerances)
Antiplatelet questions?
Risk of stroke with AF
• Risk highest with valvular AF
• All other stratification tools refer to non-valvular AF
• There are numerous different risk stratification tools which rely on different risk factors
CHADS2
Score• National Registry
of Atrial Fibrillation
• JAMA 2001
• Subsequently validated in different studies
Benefit of antithrombotic therapy
• Warfarin reduces risk of stroke by 70%
• Aspirin reduces risk by 30%– Less effect on large disabling strokes
• Aspirin + dipyridamole- very limited data
• Clopidogrel- no data
• Aspirin + clopidogrel- not as good as warfarin ? Better than aspirin
Warfarin contraindications
Not contraindications
Co-prescription of interacting drug
What is risk of bleeding with warfarin?
• Literature rate varies between 0.1%-50% per year• Initiation/transition period
– Risk of mis-communication, new behavior– Modifiable risk
• Bleeding due to underlying lesion– Eg colonic polyp, peptic ulcer, bladder lesion– “Desirable” bleeding– Not modifiable
• Long term bleeding risk– Depends on risk factors of bleeding and how well managed– Partly modifiable
5 point risk calculator
• Only applies to patients who are suitable for warfarin
• Validated in other populations
• Am J Med 1998
5 point bleeding scale
• 1 point each for :• Age > 65
• History of stroke
• History of gastrointestinal bleeding
• 1 point for any of: diabetes, recent MI, Hb<10, Creat >.13mmol/L
Score
Classifi-cation
Risk of major bleed
At 1 year
0 Low 3%
1 - 2 Intermediate 12%
3 - 4 High 25%+
Warfarin questions?