ORIGINAL PAPER
Application of PDMS-based coating in drug delivery systemsusing PVP as channeling agent
Hanie Soroory • Arezou Mashak • Azam Rahimi
Received: 21 January 2013 / Accepted: 24 July 2013
� Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2013
Abstract PDMS derivatives have been extensively used
as coating in controlled drug delivery systems in pharma-
ceutical area. The major advantages of these materials are
facilitation of adjustment of desired drug release patterns,
improvement of film formation and storage stability. In this
study PDMS-based coating systems were designed and
applied to acetaminophen tablets and their release was
investigated from the PDMS-coated tablet dosage form as a
drug model. Thus, a water emulsion of PDMS containing
tetraethoxysilane as cross-linking agent and polyvinylpyr-
rolidone (PVP) as channeling agent was prepared. Then, a
uniform smooth thin coating of PDMS was applied on
acetaminophen tablets and in vitro acetaminophen release
from PDMS-coated tablets was carried out with a home-
made setup. The morphology of the coated surfaces was
studied by SEM technique. The effect of PVP on the
mechanical properties of PDMS film was investigated by
dynamic mechanical analysis. It was found that, PVP
increased the mechanical properties of PDMS. Com-
pounding of polyethylene glycol (PEG) with PVP (1:1) as
channeling agents was also studied and compared with
PVPs-containing samples. Despite more channeling agent
content in PEG–PVP samples, the drug release percentage
was decreased.
Keywords Polydimethylsiloxane � Polyvinylpyrrolidone �Coating � Drug delivery
Introduction
In the pharmaceutical industry, coating is often used to
change and enhance the performance of drug delivery
systems, especially solid dosage forms. Enteric coating
systems are designed to provide protection to oral tablets
delivered in the stomach. Literature search results indicate
that wide arrays of polymers have been utilized as coating
materials in oral dosage forms to achieve extended drug
release. The major advantages of these materials are:
facilitation of adjustment of the desired drug release pat-
terns, improvement of film formation and storage stability,
and providing the possibility to develop novel strategies for
site specific drug delivery [1]. Coating polymers such as
Eudragit, cellulose acetate, shellac and ethyl cellulose may
provide alternative materials for the development of these
systems.
One of the most well-known polymers used as coating
material is polydimethylsiloxane. The elastomeric poly-
siloxanes (silicones) with repeating unit [–SiRR’O–] are
the most important class of inorganic polymers in this
category. Of these, poly(dimethylsiloxanes) (PDMS) with
repeating unit [–Si (CH3)2O–] is commercially available
and used in many interesting applications [2–4]. PDMS
derivatives have been extensively used in the pharmaceu-
tical area, such as in controlled drug delivery systems due
to their biostability, noncarcinogenicity, nontoxicity, bio-
compatibility, and good mechanical properties [5, 6].
Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) coatings were prepared
using end-hydroxylated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and dif-
ferent molecular weight polyethylene glycols (PEG) as
channeling agents to control drug release from pharma-
ceutical solid oral dosage forms. It is found that drug
release rate was controlled by the amount and molecular
weight of PEG. In other works, a pan-coating system was
H. Soroory � A. Mashak � A. Rahimi (&)
Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute,
P.O. Box: 14965-115, Tehran, Iran
e-mail: [email protected]
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123
Iran Polym J
DOI 10.1007/s13726-013-0178-7
used to evaluate the effect of curing agent on drug release
from the tablets coated with the same silicone elastomer [7,
8]. PDMS has been used as a pharmaceutical tablet coating
for possible zero-order release (i.e., the highly desirable
delivery of a constant amount of drug per unit of time) and
a new method was developed to prepare stable PDMS
latexes suitable for spray coating on the drug tablets. The
effect of varying amounts of PEG (Mw of 8000 g/mol) in
PDMS lattices was also investigated on controlled drug
release from pharmaceutical solid oral dosage forms [9].
PVP possesses the following properties: solubility in
most conventional solvents, film formation ability, and
affinity to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. Also, it is
soluble in many standard pharmaceutical solvents, though
at high concentrations, making the solution highly viscous.
It was found that the aqueous solubility of many drugs such
as acetaminophen is increased in the presence of PVP. The
solubility of this drug at 25 �C is increased in the presence
of PVP. Dialysis studies indicated that the nature of
interaction between PVP and acetaminophen is physical
and reversible, and there is no strong binding between PVP
and acetaminophen in their solution [10]. Water-based
PDMS latex with polyethylene glycols (PEG) channeling
agent has been successfully used to control drug release
from pharmaceutical solid oral dosage forms [11–13].
In this study, water-based emulsion of hydroxy-termi-
nated PDMS with PVP as channeling agent was prepared
and coated on acetaminophen tablets to investigate the
effect of PVP on release behavior of this drug. As PDMS
has hydrophobic character, it is necessary to use a second
phase, e.g., a water-soluble polymer as channeling agent.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was used as a channeling
agent for improving the drug release process. The thermal
and mechanical properties of PDMS films containing PVP
were evaluated using TGA and DMTA techniques.
Experimental
Materials
Hydroxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with
viscosity 90–150 cst, tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as cross-
linking agent, and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) as emulsifier
were purchased from Aldrich, USA. Polyvinylpyrrolidone
(PVP) Mw = 36000 g/mol and polyethylene glycol (PEG)
Mw = 6000 g/mol as channeling agents were obtained
from Merck (Germany). Acetaminophen tablets were
kindly provided by Aria Pharmaceutical Co., Iran. Solvents
such as toluene were purchased from Merck (Germany)
and used as received.
Instrumentation
In this study, ultrasonic processor (HD3200, Bandelin,
Germany), laser light scattering (LLS) (SEM-633, France),
infrared spectrometer (EQUINOX55, Bruker, Germany),
scanning electron microscopy (VEGA, TESCAN, The
Czech Republic), energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence
spectroscopy (INCA, Oxford Instrument, UK), differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC-PL, Polymer Laboratories,
UK), thermal gravimetry analysis (TGA-PL1500, Polymer
Laboratories, UK), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis
(DMTA-PL, Polymer Laboratories, UK), and ultra violet
spectroscopy (Shimadzu, Japan) were used.
Method
Preparing emulsion
The emulsions of PDMS in water with 1 % sodium lauryl
sulfate (SLS) as the surfactant were prepared by ultrasonic
processing for 10 min at room temperature. The emulsion
contained 30 (w/w %) PDMS, whereas its average particle
size was obtained 206 nm by LLS measurements. The
processing period affected emulsion properties particularly
its particle size. Particles with sizes greater than 400 nm
were agglomerated during curing and made coating pro-
cesses difficult.
Cross-linking of particles
To achieve good film formation, it is necessary to cross-
link PDMS. Different degrees of cross-linking affected the
characteristics of the resulting films and the specificities of
the pharmaceutical coating. The required cross-linking was
carried out by mixing the desired amount of TEOS (3.25
w/w %) into the PDMS emulsion and then stirring it for
15 min at room temperature. The molar ratio (R) of HCl/
TEOS was 0.5, giving a pH in the acidic range of 1–3. The
mixtures were then stirred at room temperature for 12 h.
Sol fraction
The samples were swollen in toluene and extracted after
4 days to remove any scissioned fragments and unreacted
materials. The networks were then slowly deswollen with
methanol, dried in air for 5 days, and reweighed. Values
for the soluble fraction of polymer, Sf, were then calculated
from the original (Wi) and final (Wf) weights using Eq. (1)
[3].
%Sf ¼Wi �Wf
Wi
� 100 ð1Þ
Iran Polym J
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123
Cross-link density
The samples were initially weighed, mi, and immersed in
10 mL toluene. Samples were placed in a linear laboratory
shaker (25 �C and speed 80 cycles/min-1) for 15 ± 1 h.
Then, swollen samples were removed and cautiously dried
to remove excess solvent before weighing, mg. During this
operation, samples were covered to avoid toluene evapo-
ration during weighing. Traces of solvent and other small
molecules were then eliminated by placing the sample in
an oven at 70 �C for 24 h. Finally, the samples were
weighed for the last time, ms, and volume fractions of
polymer in the samples at equilibrium swelling, m2m, were
determined from swelling ratio, G, and calculated as
follows:
G ¼ mg � ms
ms
� qe
qs
ð2Þ
and,
v2m ¼1
1þ Gð3Þ
where, qe and qs are the densities of elastomer and solvent,
respectively.
The samples cross-link density, m, was determined from
measurements in a solvent, using the Flory–Rehner rela-
tionship, given by Eq. (4):
m ¼ �Ln 1� m2mð Þ þ m2m þ v12m22m
V1 m1=32m � 2
u m2m
� � ð4Þ
where, V1 = 106.5 is the molar volume of the solvent
(toluene), m2m is the volume fraction of polymer in the
sample at equilibrium swelling, u = 4 is the cross-link
functionality and v12 = 0.47 is the interaction parameter
between polymer and solvent [8]. The densities of elasto-
mers were measured according to ASTM D-1505 at 23 �C
which changed from 1.088 to 1.144 g/cm3.
Film casting
The PDMS emulsion (20 mL) was cast into a polytetra-
fluoroethylene dish and dried for 8 days at room temper-
ature. The resulting film was placed in a vacuum oven and
dried at 60 �C for 24 h prior to any characterization
measurements.
Channeling agent
Different amounts of PVP (2.5, 5, and 7 w/w %) were added
to the PDMS emulsion and the free film was prepared from
them. PEG with Mw = 6000 (5 w/w % and at 1:1 mixture
with PVP) was used as another channeling agent.
EDXRF (Si-mapping)
PDMS films with and without PVP were prepared and then
placed in liquid nitrogen and after breaking coated with
gold. The samples were observed for Si-mapping.
TGA
A thermogravimetric analyzer was used to investigate the
thermal stabilities of the free-standing films under nitrogen
from 50 to 700 �C at a 10 �C/min heating rate.
DMTA
Samples of pure PDMS with different amounts of PVP in a
cubic form with thickness of 1–3 mm, width of 5–10 mm,
and length of 30–40 mm were tested to determine their
DMTA data. The mode of the tensile test was used (fre-
quency: 1 Hz and displacement: 0.5 mm).
Tablet coating
Tablets were covered with different polymers, e.g., Eu-
deragit, PDMS, and Shellac to control or modify the
release rate. In the pharmaceutical industry to apply these
polymeric coatings on tablets, aqueous or solvent-coating
processes are used [13]. There are different ways to coat
the tablets, e.g., spray and dip coating.
Dip coating is one of the most common techniques
used for coating tablets which were used in this research.
In this technique, drug tablets were immersed in the
PDMS emulsion for 5 min and ejected slowly at a con-
stant speed and dried. Acetaminophen tablets were coated
with PDMS emulsion. Then, they were dried for 3 days at
room temperature, placed in liquid nitrogen and cut to
cross sections. Their cross sections were observed by
SEM technique.
In vitro drug release study
In vitro acetaminophen release study from PDMS-coated
tablets was carried out with a homemade setup for the
release studies at 37 �C [14]. The tablets were tested for
24 h in 100 mL of phosphate buffer, pH 5.8, as release
solution with gentle stirring for maintaining sink conditions.
For the determination of acetaminophen release profile,
three coated tablets were placed separately in release
solution. At different time intervals of 1–24 h, 3 mL of
release media were taken and immediately replaced with a
fresh solution. The concentrations of released acetamino-
phen were measured with a double-beam UV–Vis spec-
trophotometer (Shimadzu UV-1650 PC) at the adsorption
maximum of 242 nm. Polydimethylsiloxane emulsions
Iran Polym J
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123
prepared with and without hydrophilic additives are listed in
Table 1.
Result and discussion
LLS analysis
The size of emulsion droplet is important. If it is more than
400 nm, during cross-linking reaction droplets will be
coagulated. Under a specific condition of time and power
of the apparatus, the average size of the droplets was
reduced to 206 nm.
Sol fraction and cross-link density
In this step the polymer chains were cross-linked with
TEOS (3.25 w/w %). To evaluate the progress of the
reaction network, sol fraction and cross-link density were
determined. Sol fraction and cross-link density of the
samples at 3.25 (w/w %) TEOS were 10.388 % and
0.0118 mol/cm3, respectively. Higher sol fraction means
that a lower percentage of chains participated in the cross-
linking reaction. In fact, sol fraction and cross-link density
are criteria for cross-linking reaction.
TGA analysis
Figure 1 shows TGA curves of pure PDMS coating and
PVP-loaded sample in a nitrogen atmosphere. The weight-
loss curves for pure PDMS and PVP-loaded coatings imply
a one-step degradation mechanism.
Partial oxidation of the silicone chain groups into silica
and the formation of species including carbon monoxide,
carbon dioxide, formaldehyde, hydrogen, and water occur
through methyl substitution oxidation. The starting decom-
position temperatures of PDMS and PVP-loaded coatings
are about 400 �C, but at higher temperatures degradation
of the blend occurs slowly. Thus, the thermal stability of
PVP-loaded coatings is somehow higher than that of the pure
PDMS coating. This behavior is due to the chemical inter-
action between carbonyl group of PVP and unreacted OH of
PDMS chains [15]. Therefore, it is demonstrated that the
stability of pure PDMS was improved with the formation of
hydrogen bonding between carboxyl groups of PVP, and the
hydroxyl groups remained in unreacted PDMS during cross-
linking reaction of PDMS.
EDXRF (Si-mapping)
The compatibility of PDMS and PVP greatly affects ther-
mal, mechanical, and release properties of the coating
system. The distribution of PVP phase in PDMS was elu-
cidated using the mapping technique. Figure 2 shows the
EDXRF Si mapping of F0/0 and F5/0. The red points in
these figures denote Si atoms. Figure 2a is related to pure
PDMS coating in which the Si atoms uniformly disperse
throughout the coating. By comparing these two maps in
Fig. 2a, b, it is observed that there is no Si atoms present in
some regions in the PDMS loaded with PVP. It is sug-
gested that this dark regions with no Si atoms belongs to
PVP that acts as channeling agent.
DMTA results
It is found that the mechanical properties of PDMS are
changed by incorporation of PVP. Figure 3a, b shows the
response of PDMS coating to a constant sinusoidal
mechanical stress of constant frequency as a function of
temperature as modulus and tan d, respectively. The values
of the storage modulus decreased as the temperature
increased. For pure PDMS, the a-relaxation attributed to the
glass transition occurred around -110 �C. Above -50 �C
the melting process of PDMS crystallites started and led to a
dramatic drop in the mechanical properties [16].
Viscoelastic properties of the PDMS/PVP films are
given in Fig. 3 for the temperature range of -150 to
150 �C. As the weight fraction of PVP increases in the
blends, an increase in the values of the dynamic modulus
Table 1 Formulation of the prepared samples
Formulation PDMSa (w/w %) PVPa (w/w %) PEGa (w/w %)
F0/0 30 – –
F100 – 100 –
F2.5/0 30 2.5 –
F5/0 30 5 –
F7.5/0 30 7.5 –
F0/5 30 – 5
F5/5 30 5 5
a Values of concentration (w/w %) are related to the solution of
PDMS in water Fig. 1 TGA thermographs of F0/0 and F5/0 film samples
Iran Polym J
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123
can be noticed in the temperature range above -30 �C.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the presence of the PVP
phase significantly improves the overall mechanical prop-
erties of the PDMS film [15]. It can be seen that for sam-
ples with more weight fractions of PVP (F5/0 and F7.5/0), an
increase in the storage modulus values occurred. However,
a drop of storage modulus was revaluated for the F2.5/0
sample probably due to the plasticizing effects of PVP at
lower concentration, which thereby caused more flexibility
of PDMS [16].
SEM results
Figure 4 shows the SEM micrographs of the coated tablets
with PVP/PDMS emulsion. The observed morphology
suggests that a uniform smooth film has been achieved by
coating method (Fig. 4a). No crack or porosity was
observed on the thin polymer coating on the tablets. It was
also found that the polymeric layer was uniform and,
throughout, its thickness was 204 lm (Fig. 4b).
Effect of PVP on release behavior of acetaminophen
The PDMS-based coating systems were designed for
acetaminophen tablets to prevent its release into the
stomach. PDMS cannot absorb water due to its hydro-
phobic characteristic. However to improve water intake
properties of PDMS coating, bulk modification is neces-
sary. It is found that addition of different amounts of pol-
yvinylpyrrolidone and polyethylene glycol as channeling
agents can improve its water absorption. These polymers
are soluble when immersed in the release media and drug
release from the polymeric coating is facilitated by diffu-
sion of water through the core and leaching out of the drug
[10].
To investigate the effect of PVP as channeling agent on
acetaminophen release profile, three formulations (F2.5/0,
F5/0, F7.5/0 samples) were designed and studied as presented
in Table 1. The percentage of drug released from coated
acetaminophen tablets with PDMS layer containing dif-
ferent amounts of PVP versus time is shown in Fig. 5.
All coated tablets showed small amounts of drug
releases (0–10 %) during the first 4 h in the release media.
The PVP contents and mechanical properties of the coat-
ings are two main parameters affecting the release behavior
Fig. 2 Si-mappings of a F0/0 and b F5/0 film samples
Fig. 3 DMTA results: modulus (a) and tand (b) for PDMS and
PDMS/PVP film samples
Iran Polym J
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123
of PDMS coating. For example, incorporation of higher
amounts of PVP (F7.5/0) resulted in faster release of acet-
aminophen through diffusional pathways due to dissolution
and leaching out of PVP in water, thereby increasing the
rate of drug release. On the other hand, an unusual release
behavior for F2.5/0 and F5/0 was observed, i.e., a higher
amount of drug was released from tablets coated by PDMS
layer with lower contents of PVP, which can be explained
on the basis of the mechanical properties of polymeric
coating, as the mechanical properties of a polymer are
important factors in its drug delivery behavior. As shown in
Fig. 3a, there is a dramatic drop in the mechanical prop-
erties of the F2.5/0 sample compared with F7.5/0 and F5/0
samples regarding DMTA results.
A gradual drop of storage modulus E0 at lower amount
of PVP (F2.5/0) and the resulting flexibility properties may
be due to the plasticizing effect of PVP in lower amounts,
which was confirmed by moving the Tg peak of F2.5/0
toward the Tg peak of PDMS (Fig. 3a). This is an indica-
tion of more miscibility of PDMS and PVP due to their
chemical structures [16]. Consequently, the amount of
acetaminophen released from F7.5/0 sample was more than
that of the F5/0 and F7.5/0 samples.
Effect of both PEG and PVP on release behavior
of acetaminophen
Controlled release formulations have been developed by
coating of acetaminophen tablets with PDMS containing
both PEG and PVP. PEG was also selected as channeling
agent, because it is known to be non-toxic and it has
hydrophilic characteristic to make it soluble in water. It has
been used as excipient for a number of pharmaceutical drug
formulations.
Both PVP and PEG are miscible and through combi-
nation, hydrogen bonding between carbonyl groups of
PVP-repeating units and complementary hydroxyl end
groups of PEG chains are formed. By forming two H bonds
through both terminal OH groups, PEG acts as a reversible
cross-linker for PVP chains [16]. However, when the tab-
lets were coated with PDMS coating containing both PVPFig. 4 SEM micrographs of: a coated tablet (a) and its 204 lm
coating thickness (b)
Fig. 5 Effect of different amounts of PVP (2.5, 5 and 7.5 w/w %) on
drug release rate of PDMS/PVP film samples
Fig. 6 Effect of PVP (F5/0), PEG (F0/5), and PEG ? PVP (F5/5) on
drug release rate of PDMS/PVP/PEG film samples
Iran Polym J
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123
and PEG, drug release occurred with lag time and was
reduced due to the slow solubilization of the two chan-
neling agents. The formation of channels took some time.
In this case, drug release took about 400 min. After
400 min, the absorption of water by the coating increased
and H bonds were broken; therefore, PVP and PEG were
swollen and dissolved in water separately. Finally, drug
release was followed by formation of channels.
Figure 6 shows the percentage release of acetaminophen
versus time for F0/5, F5/5 and F5/0 formulations. It is
observed that the highest amount of drug release occurred
for PEG. It can be explained by the fact that PEG is more
soluble in water than PVP; thus, formation of channels can
be easier.
From Fig. 6, it is also clear that drug release from
samples containing both PVP and PEG were unexpectedly
lower than PEG, whereas for coatings with more loading
levels (10 %) of PVP ? PEG as channeling agents, it was
expected that more channels were formed and thus more
drug was released. These phenomena can be explained by
considering molecular interactions between PVP and
PEG.
Conclusion
In this study, PVP and PEG were incorporated as chan-
neling agents in PDMS-based coating for acetaminophen
tablet. TGA and DMTA results showed the PVP effects on
thermal behavior and mechanical properties of the PDMS
polymer. The in vitro drug release profiles from coated
tablets were compared during 24 h. Different behaviors
were observed in drug release profiles on increasing the
amount of channeling agent. It was found that drug release
percentage increased for higher amount of PVP-loaded
sample (F7.5/0) due to enhancing the channel formation in
the release media. Higher drug release percentage was
observed for sample with lower PVP (F2.5/0) compared with
F5/0 due to reduction of mechanical properties. The results
also showed that drug release was increased by the addition
of PEG. It can be concluded that some molecular interac-
tions exist between PVP and PEG that affect their drug
release behavior.
Acknowledgments The financial support from Iran National Sci-
ence Foundation (Grant No. 87041557) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Siepmann F, Siepmann J, Walther M, MacRae RJ, Bodmeier R
(2008) Polymer blends for controlled release coatings. J Control
Release 125:1–15
2. McCarthy DW, Mark JE (1998) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) elasto-
mers from aqueous emulsions: I. preparations, and characteriza-
tion of the curing and aging processes. Rubber Chem Technol
71:906–927
3. Fu Y, Kao WJ (2010) Drug release kinetics and transport
mechanisms of non-degradable and degradable polymeric deliv-
ery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 7:429–444
4. Rahimi A, Mashak A (2013) A review on rubbers in medicine:
natural silicone and polyurethane rubbers. Plast Rubber Compos
42:223–230
5. Mashak A (2008) In vitro drug release from silicone rubber–
polyacrylamide composite. Silicone Chem 3:295–301
6. Mashak A, Rahimi A (2009) Silicone polymers in controlled drug
delivery systems: a review. Iran Polym J 18:279–295
7. Li LC, Peck GE (1989) Water based silicone elastomer controlled
release tablet film coating 1: free film evaluation. Drug Dev Ind
Pharm 15:65–95
8. Dahl TC, Sue IT (1992) Mechanisms to control drug release from
pellets coated with a silicone elastomer aqueous dispersion.
Pharm Res 9:398–405
9. Nahrup JS, Gao ZM, Mark JE, Sakr A (2004) Poly(dimethylsi-
loxane) coatings for controlled drug release polymer modifica-
tions. Int J Pharm 270:199–208
10. Garekani HA, Sadeghi F, Ghazi A (2003) Increasing the aqueous
solubility of acetaminophen in the presence of polyvinylpyrroli-
done and investigation of the mechanisms involved. Drug Dev Int
Pharm 29:173–179
11. Gao Z, Nahrup JS, Mark JE, Sakr A (2005) Poly(dimethylsilox-
ane) coatings for controlled drug release. III. Drug release profiles
and swelling properties of the free-standing films. J Appl Polym
Sci 96:494–501
12. Panou AI, Papadokostaki KG, Tarantili PA, Sanopoulou M
(2013) Effect of hydrophilic inclusions on PDMS cross-linking
reaction and its interrelation with mechanical and water sorption
properties of cured films. Eur Poly J 49:1083–1810
13. Pandey P, Turton R, Joshi N, Hammerman E, Ergun J (2006)
Scale-up of a pan-coating process. AAPS Pharm SciTec 7:125–132http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001430571
3001730 - af005
14. Mashak A, Taghizadeh SM (2006) In vitro progesterone release
from c-irradiated cross-linked polydimethylsiloxane. Radiat Phys
Chem 75:229–235
15. Carlberg M, Colombini D, Maurer FHJ (2004) Ethylene–pro-
pylene–rubber (EPR)/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) binary
polymer blends: morphology and viscoelastic properties. Appl
Polym Sci 94:2240–2249
16. Feldstein MM, Roos A, Chevallier C, Creton C, Dormidontovac
EE (2003) Relation of glass transition temperature to the
hydrogen bonding degree and energy in poly(N-vinyl pyrroli-
done) blends with hydroxyl-containing plasticizers: 3. Analysis of
two glass transition temperatures featured for PVP solutions in
liquid poly(ethylene glycol). Polymer 44:1819–1834
Iran Polym J
Iran Polymer and
Petrochemical Institute 123