+ All Categories
Home > Documents > APSE – November, 2013

APSE – November, 2013

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: kuame-ochoa
View: 28 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Turning Tides: Re-Investing in the Future of Supported Employment. David Mank, Ph.D. and Teresa Grossi, Ph.D. Indiana Institute on Disability and Community Indiana University www.iidc.indiana.edu. APSE – November, 2013. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
27
David Mank, Ph.D. and Teresa Grossi, Ph.D. Indiana Institute on Disability and Community Indiana University www.iidc.indiana.edu Turning Tides: Re-Investing in the Future of Supported Employment APSE – November, 2013
Transcript
Page 1: APSE – November, 2013

David Mank, Ph.D. and Teresa Grossi, Ph.D.

Indiana Institute on Disability and Community

Indiana Universitywww.iidc.indiana.edu

Turning Tides: Re-Investing in the Future of Supported Employment

APSE – November, 2013

Page 2: APSE – November, 2013

WORK: Intentional physical or mental effort directed toward the production or accomplishment of something, most often to benefit someone other than one’s self.

Page 3: APSE – November, 2013

Initial investments in the 1980’s and 1990’s created

an environment of possibility.

Page 4: APSE – November, 2013

Supported employment emerged in federal law in

1984.

P. L. 98-527

Page 5: APSE – November, 2013

The history from the late 1970’s to the present includes a host of developments and documentation of positive outcomes, development of improved methods, organizational approaches, systemic strategies, as well as policy and funding mechanisms.

Page 6: APSE – November, 2013

There is an unevenness across states in the implementation of employment options.

Page 7: APSE – November, 2013

There are about 20% of people in some day service with access to integrated employment, and this average has been much the same for nearly 20 years.

Page 8: APSE – November, 2013

From impossible to possible ….From possible to beneficial ….From beneficial to allowed ….From allowed to preferred ….From preferred to expected ….From expected to required ….

…. to the same standard as everyone else

Employment

Page 9: APSE – November, 2013

U. S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy

Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Department of EducationCenter for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Social Security Administration

Renewed National Scale Investment

Page 10: APSE – November, 2013

Alliance for Full ParticipationNational Governor’s AssociationEmployment First Approaches

AND …

Page 11: APSE – November, 2013

Supported Employment MethodsCustomized EmploymentSelf-EmploymentProject SearchTransition

Improvements in Employment Implementation

Page 12: APSE – November, 2013

Excellent job matchMaximum hours / week possibleNeutral supportsBenefits planningPersonalizeTake advantage of what is ‘typical’ in a job setting

Maximizing Individual Outcomes

Page 13: APSE – November, 2013

Funding Focused on Outcomes

Page 14: APSE – November, 2013

Individual ChoicesFamily ExperiencesLegislation

New Information About Sheltered Settings

Page 15: APSE – November, 2013

Few hours day / weekGroup employmentSub-minimum wageProviders as employer of recordAggressive use of tax creditsProtecting SSI/SSDI benefits

Ways to Diminish Outcomes

Page 16: APSE – November, 2013

Over 300 different types of cereals?

Over 40 different types of toothpaste?

Over 230 different types of soups?

Did You Know That We Have Choice Of:

Page 17: APSE – November, 2013

How many work experiences (paid or nonpaid) do individuals with disabilities typically have prior to a permanent job?

How many experiences does it take before truly understanding a person’s strengths, preferences, interests, and needs?

How many opportunities prior to closing the case?

Choice For Individuals:

Page 18: APSE – November, 2013

People choose to congregatePeople are happy where they areIts too expensiveThe community is not a friendly place

Some people aren’t “ready”Some people are too severely disabled

Supported Employment is simply a different – not a better - paradigm

Arguments Against Expansion of Supported Employment

Page 19: APSE – November, 2013

Renewed Business

Leadership:

Walgreens, Starbucks, BLN’s

and More

Page 20: APSE – November, 2013

Litigation

U. S. Department of Justice

Page 21: APSE – November, 2013

Renewed Investment in Transition and Post Secondary Education

Page 22: APSE – November, 2013

International Developments

Page 23: APSE – November, 2013

Rising Voice of Self-Advocates

(sabe.org)

Page 24: APSE – November, 2013

Equal employment opportunities for equal pay for all people

Immediately, no new people can go into sheltered workshops

Immediately, no new people can go join an enclave

Ending sub-minimum wage in 2012

Ending enclaves in 2014

Therefore, Be It Resolved

Page 25: APSE – November, 2013

Funding Constraints:Hours of employment delivered for people that do get jobs

Continued slow pace of expansion

“Benefits trap”Sustained pressure in states to expand day services

Potential Threats to Further Expansion of Integrated Employment

Page 26: APSE – November, 2013

PolicyLitigationResearchImplementationFunding

Implications

Page 27: APSE – November, 2013

Do what we already know how to do

Put control of resources in the hands of people with disabilities

Eradicate policy conflictsClose the door of entry into segregated programs

Expand investment with employers

Invest in broader community initiatives

A New Path to Change


Recommended