AR1000I - semspub.epa.gov · Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) , and as amended by the ... -H-*iHd...

FEDERAL ON-SCENE/ COORDINATOR rs REPORT

RAY YORK AUTO BODY SHOP/DRUM DUMP SITEOAK HILL, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

CERCIAi REMOVAL ACTION 'August 12, 1987 through May 3, ;1988

REGION 111

RESPONSETEAM

Benton M. Wilmoth, OSCU.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region IIIWheeling, West Virginia

AR1000I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FACTS SHEET

FOREWORD

I. INTRODUCTIONA. Initial SituationB. Location of the SiteC. Efforts to Obtain Response from Potential Responsible

PartyII. ROSTER OF AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALS, AND

ORGANIZATION OF THE RESPONSE

III. NARRATIVE OF EVENTS

IV. RESOURCES COMMITTEDA. Initial Funding RequestB. Total Cost Summary

V. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMOVALA* Activities of the Various Agencies

1. Potential Responsible Party2. State and Local Forces3. Federal Agencies and Special Forces4 . Contractors

B. Disposal Methods and Quantities Removed

VI. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

VII. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND RECOMMENDATIONS

VIII. LEGAL ASPECTS

APPENDICESA. Maps and SketchesB. Special Bulletin AC. Additional Funding RequestD. Site Safety ProtocolE. Analytical ResultsF. CorrespondenceG. Photographic DocumentationH. POLREPsI* Delivery Order/Procurement RequestJ* Manifests

A R I O O O i i

REGION III Project #180CERCLA EMERGENCY RESPONSE/IMMEDIATE REMOVAL ACTION FACTS gpEET

SITE: Ray York Auto Body Shop/Drum Dump Site

SIZE: 20 Drums on approximately 600 sq. ft. of soil

LOCATION: Oak.Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia

APPROVAL DATE: August 12, 1987PROJECT DATES: August 12, 1987 through May 3, 1988

DESCRIPTION: The Ray York Body Shop was an abandoned garagelocated in a residential section of Oak Hill,WV, The structure was used by the formerowner to house crude stills used for refiningwaste paint thinners and solvents into adistilled lacquer thinner. Adjacent thegarage twenty (20) drums containing paintsludges and waste solvents were leftunsecured in an area frequented by children.Spillage from the drums had stressed vegeta-tion in the area and deposited dark residueon the side of the garage and drums. TheThe site posed a substantial threat tonearby residents.

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL: Paint Wastes and Solvents

QUANTITIES REMOVED: 36 Drums (55 gallons each)

OSC: Benton M. Wilmoth

REMOVAL CONTRACTOR: AMO Pollution Services, Inc., Canonsburg, PA

DISPOSAL LOCATION: ThermalKEM, Rock Hill, South Carolina

PROJECT CEILING: $100,000

PROJECT COST: $ 67,100 (estimated)

COMMENTS: Cooperation between federal and stateauthorities helped to eliminate this threatto public health and the environment in atimely and professional manner.

Benton M. WilmothSenior On-Scene CoordinatorU.S. EPA Region III RR | QQQ | 2Wheeling, WV 26003

FOREWORD

The OSC, as mandated in the National Oil and HazardousSubstances Contingency Plan (NCP) , and as amended by theSuperfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 isrequired to provide a coordinated Federal response capability atthe scene of a sudden discharge of oil or hazardous substancethat poses an imminent and substantial threat to human healthand/or the environment. In addition, the provisions of theComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and LiabilityAct (CERCLA) promote a coordinated Federal, State, and LocalResponse to mitigate situations at hazardous waste sites.

The threats posed to the residents from the presence ofhazardous wastes at this site necessitated an emergency responseaction to negate the threats. Hence, the provisions of the NCPand CERCLA were implemented by the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region III, Wheeling, West Virginia.

Benton M. Wilmoth, Senior OSCU.S. EPA Region IIIWheeling, WV 26003

A R I O O O I 3

i

INTRODUCTION

A. Initial Situation

On June 11, 1987, the EPA, Region III Emergency ResponseSection was notified by the West Virginia Department of NaturalResources (WVDNR) that a number of drums with unknown contentshad been dumped adjacent to the abandoned Ray York Auto Body Shopin Oak Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia. The site wasreferred to the WVDNR by local concerned citizens due to the factthat the facility was located centrally in a moderate sizehousing development and in an area frequented by children.

On July 1, 1987 Roy F. Weston's Technical Assistance Team(TAT) performed a preliminary assessment of the site per Sr. OSCBenton Wilmoth 's request. The site consisted of eight 55-gallondrums and twelve 30 -gal Ion drums of unknown material. Ten of thedrums proved to be empty, two were sealed firmly, and theremaining drums were filled with an orange/yellow paint sludge inwater or solvent. Spillage from the drums darkened the soil anddistressed the vegetation in the area and stained the shop sidingwith dark residue. The TAT observed children riding bicycleson the lot and playing near the drums and abandoned body shop.

Based on the laboratory analysis of drum and soil samplesobtained during the TAT assessment, the OSC concluded removalaction was necessary to abate a significant threat to the localcommunity posed by the presence of the paint wastes. On August12, 1987, EPA OSC Benton M. Wilmoth activated the Delegation ofAuthority under the CERCLA Section 14-1-A for $50,000 to mitigatethis immediate threat to human health and the environment. TheOSC then issued a Delivery Order to ERCS for $35,000 for anemergency removal at this site.

B. Site Location

The former Ray York Auto Body Shop was located off JohnsonAvenue in East Oak Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia. The siteoccupied a central lot in a moderately sized housing development.Approximately 100 residential homes were located within 1/2 milefrom the site and the Oak Hill business district was within onemile. The site was adjacent (100 feet) a small tributary to theGauley River* Site location maps are included as Appendix A ofthis report.

C. Efforts to Obtain Cleanup by Potential Responsible Party

As of May 3, 1988, no responsible parties (PRP) have beenidentified as the former business is in bankruptcy and theproperty is owned by HUD.

A R I O O O i l f

COM<pQH>HO W55 EHH H

^> y3 feK

CO Q55XO (VH OHa< CONH >*S5Q< QMj |£)aop* P

CO <M X0«S50W ><0

oP5EHCOQ

nV-H433Q<Hoco•H•pft-H

u(0

.poid§u

u0)a01

•o<•o

01E5SG

<wO

th

M Co o•P-H

c <a•H c•O-Hh-OO h0 O0 0o0)c u n0) O 0)O <H-HCO 4-t1 QJ *HCH >O.Q-HH n uid c idh O0) ftO)•a w .p0) 0) *Hb M 01

JS7iH•Hscoc

. ffl

HHH

CH O«-H C

i*tu: i a> c3 W-HC >» -an

-H O fl)H 0> C W-H 0So c p «t*OS W< ft H01 01 4J CH

fl) e Q) 0) > CO-P O «*H & Ch(0 *H 'O 14J 4J >i O -fOco o b A cnn0) C-P C egT) 4-> 0) <D -H0) O &£H^4J H H Q) -d-•H 04 0) n 0) OC i o £ np W « £

C-H O

•H•OH0) A

ra fto10 *O -HU C 01id id a)ID cj£O-H•H H CP<H 0) C<H fl -Ho&g01 id o)M *H O-H-O Cid o o*H e o<H

c uO-H 0)•HH MH *d Q)A CPp (0 C& jfi-H

fl

1O*0ggI,3tf

HHH

CH O4J &c i w0) tf fi ti -H oc i id HO *H O\

•H &•< fl)> C Q)C OJ U M<<H CO 0

01 JQ *O« C 3-P *CO4J O &t S-H cn*-H C £ 1

CQ 0 o eiH eftQ) Q) Q) IO

Q) 0 O U 1C ~-P M-H H IT)•H 04 <H H *H H

p O eo ft

tioft0)

HH-rtftU

Hid-H ••PH•H HCH•HC

fl) O5 tj*s* -*•U fcQ) H^^ oQP

01Q)KjKidiid0<

<Mo

Q) 4Je c> HJJ Q) HM TO M nid 0) 4J inft U CO Mah3 O 0) > Cft

Id 01 -H S N•H <U U 9tCKfl j-in•H p: c i&H fl) O CO& (C 0)4-> t•H M M 01 n> 3 O 0)P H +> id o h *rm 2; vc to o

fl) N J: r>3: HU^

i Q) tr>C J3 CO 4J-HU J 4

M-l O 4J*•* O 43 0)EH *H *H<4J C idEH C 0 01^g g

B *Q

S 01 h Cid 01 o id0) 0) PEH M O CT>01 id cfl) « fc-HO 4JHC H C ft<d <d o 3W 4J tfl•H-H »0n c fl) cW-H -o o< -H-H

0) > PHA o id •Id 53 U 4J HU ftC 0•H T3 fl) OC fl) -g O.C-p 0> 3-PU OP O OQ) 3-H O MEH *O 01 *O ft

id cM O

h H HQ) 0) fl)

5*5O 'OHH 5

43 fl) fl) Mft id id01 O O 3O'H-H Idb SC X 04

tyc-H•oH-H3• PQ (o

U 0C >iOH4J 01 VO

0) H N•* 0) |k oc to id HP CO S H01 - 1flj e *o *n« *• C N

fa °1 ti *Jin p 0) WlO o fl £ nOJ H W S "-

o ic c ft-H A ft c H gooO43-HOQ43 ^ftQft 4*H I

_ 01 >i*H Id 01 pH

HH 0 ft-H so id K O & - ^ „ ..> E<H 04> « « 0

CO Q55 XHO

COH

§s*• p

CQ <

O

CO§

w

01

<HOco•H43ft-HMO01

10SOu

a001a

31idCOIid55

010 >i

u U uO -H I «

CO «H T3 > C 00)CJ C El O H 03 Sfirf O A 0} O JQ ^ 0) *OH H C O I -HH O 00£ « *H 09 0 0 Tj .C 43

O 0) M H I O C *H.COO43 ftOOl HMCM O «-l-P C C001H ftOO0 ft<M Id 0 0 »4 Itf ft<M-H^ ' >40^H. 5 ^ 4 3

, ft M H 01 0) Idft « * 0 CQ 0+3 > ft O-H>

43 C C ft O pC-H Id 0 43 OQ >i 4J C H I

Q O OH43 0

434> H*dC M WM.-HO _o M 3 <d-P o <Q3B«ft.-H M - H O H4)S

01

I P8 *H £ 0e & IJC 0 H•S 8 do • p H

oi

o43 Ca H«** 0 Is*• •* OHO w -H nH CO ft tt H0 CO 0 H

*43 U) CO HHO W C & CO*« W O T! o?0 CO fO _43 • »« H ^SMid D >i * H N fi Cft£ 10 O •** 01to!°i2sr • o^X C H 0QCH

P *coA t 1

ARIOOOI6

LJCO

LJ

L_POID

Oona1-11

oo

a:Q

Q

CDCO

o

m•o

Q_O

Q.LJ

5m

o 1—

05LJ—'

ARIOOOI7

NARRATIVE OF EVENTS

Sr. OSC Benton H. Wilmoth acted upon the States request toinvestigate ababdibed drums at the Ray York Auto Body Shop in OakHill, Fayette County, West Virginia. The OSC tasked Roy F.Weston's Technical Assistance Team (TAT) with performing apreliminary assessment to determine the extent of threat posed tothe local community by the presence of the drums. TAT conducteda preliminary walkthrough of the affected area which produced HNUreadings significantly above background and obtained samples fromdrums, soil and the building.

Laboratory analysis of the samples confirmed the presence ofsolvents and HSL metals in and around the drums in concentrationswhich warranted emergency removal actions* Hence, the OSCenacted his $50,000 Delegation of Authority to initiate cleanupof the site.

ERCS mobilized personnel and equipment to the site where theytransferred solid and liquid waste from origin drums and thesurrounding area into removal drums. ERCS performed post cleanupsampling on the removal area and transported the 21 drums ofwaste to the AMO Pollution Services, Inc. temporary storage depot(TSD), in Canonsburg, PA. <

The analytical data package from the ERCS post cleanupsampling was submitted to the EPA and TAT offices in Wheeling, WV.The data indicated high concentrations of solvents remained insoil adjacent the auto body shop. The OSC deemed it necessary toremobilize ERCS and TAT to the site to complete cleanup of thecontaminated soil.

On site, TAT and ERCS conducted an extent of contaminationstudy in the area of the initial removal. Small pockets ofconcentrated liquid solvent wastes were found isolated in thesoil to a depth of 14 inches. ERCS generated 15 additional drumsof contaminated soil from the area and staged the drums insidethe auto body shop to await acceptance from a final disposalfacility. Additional samples were obtained after the soilremoval for analysis and determination of cleanup progress.

On 2/4/88, ten days after the additional removal, EPA'sOffice of Public Affairs (OPA) was notified by an Oak Hill cityofficial that persons unknown forced entry into the Ray York Shopwhere the 15 drums awaited disposal. Sr. OSC Wilmoth requestedprompt removal of the drums to abate the imminent threat.

TAT and ERCS remobilized to the site for the removal of the15 drums to ThermalKEM final disposal facility in Rock Hill, SC.The 15 drums were transported with the 21 drums from TSD by AMOPollution Services, Inc. to final disposal.

ARIQOOI8

As final disposal costs were anticipated to exceed thecurrent ERCS ceiling of $35,000, the OSC and TAT drafted aRequest for Additional Funding in the amount of $50,000 andsubmitted it to the Regional Administrator for approval.

Upon receipt and review of analytical data from the extent-of-contamination study, OSC/TAT determined minor concentrations ofsolvents still present in the soil posed no threat to thesurrounding community. The OSC determined that further removalactions were unnecessary at this time. Analytical data isincluded in Appendix E of this report.

ARIOOOI9

RESOURCES COMMITTED

A. Funding Request

^ Based on the report by the West Virginia Department ofNatural Resources and the preliminary assessment by Weston'sTechnical Assistance Team, the OSC concluded an imminent andsignificant risk of harm to human health and the environment wasposed by the drums of paint wastes, waste solvents, andcontaminated soil at the Ray York Auto Body Shop.

A copy of Special Bulletin A outlining the OSC's activationof CERCLA funds is included as Appendix B of this report. TheDelegation of Authority (14-1-A) authorizes the OSC to approveCERCLA removals with a total cost of less than $50,000. OnAugust 12, 1987 the OSC issued Delivery Order 17445-03-004to ERCS in the amount of $35,000 to initiate emergency removalactions to and abate the threat posed by the presence of thewaste drums at the Ray York shop. A copy of the Delivery Orderis included as Appendix I of this report.

Funding Increases

The OSC determined that additional monies were necessary tocomplete the final disposal of the thirty-six (36) drums of wastesgenerated from the site. On April 18, 1988, the OSC submitted theAdditional Funding Request to the Regional Office for approval. OnApril 22, 1988, pursuant to the Delegation of Authority 14-1-A,(9/13/87), and as amended by Section 401 (E) of Superfund

\j Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), an increase inthe amount of $50,000 for this site was approved by the RegionalAdministrator, James M. Seif. A copy of the Additional FundingRequest is included in Appendix C of this report.

C. Total Cost Summary (Estimated)

EXTRAMURALA. ERCS (O.K. Materials)

1. Personnel (incl. per diem) $ 12,282.872. Equipment Total 676.803. Field Purchases Total 2,556.844. Subcontracted Services 10,603.995. Sampling and Analysis 4,190.006. Transportation Services 5,419.877. Disposal Services 16,817.91

B TAT 10 392.98EXTRAMURAL SUBTOTAL ' $ 62,941.26

IntramuralA. EPA/OSC $ 1,729.36B* EPA HQ (15%) 9,700.59INTRAMURAL SUBTOTAL $ 11,429.95

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS ,PROJECT CEILING -$100,

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMOVAL

A. Activities of the Various Agencies———mvwrtv

1. Potential Responsible Party

As mentioned earlier in this report, no responsible partieshave been identified as the former business is in bankruptcy andthe current property owner is owned HUD.

2. Federal Agencies

Benton M. Wilmoth, U.S. EPA Region III, Sr. On-SceneCoordinator, directed all site activities during the removal. Sr.OSC Wilmoth coordinated the daily activities of the contractor,state, and TAT personnel.

Ray Germann, EPA Office of Public Affairs, assisted inhandling media queries and public interest concerning the site.

3. State and Local Forces

Pam Hayes, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources,Division of Waste Management, was responsible for directing theinitial spill report to EPA. *

4. Contractors

Roy F. Weston's Technical Assistant Team (TAT) conductedthe initial assessment of the site and provided the OSC withexpertise on determining the extent of threat posed to theadjacent community. TAT performed contractor monitoring, sitedocumentation, site safety monitoring, and conducted an extent-of-contamination study. TAT also assisted with administrativeduties in preparing the draft OSC report.

The Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) contractor,O.H. Materials Inc., subcontracted AMO Pollution Services Inc. tosupply the personnel, equipment, and materials necessary tocomplete removal according to the OSC. AMO conducted sampling,arranged for laboratory analysis, overpacked drums, restored thesite, and transported the removed wastes to TSD and finaldisposal.

B. Disposal Mefchqfls and Quantities Removed

Paint wastes and waste solvents in origin drums weretransferred to stable overpack drums by AMO Pollution personnel.Contaminated soil was hand excavated and also placed in drums. Atotal of 36 drums was generated from the site and transported toThermalKEM in Rock Hill, South Carolina for final disposal. TheUniform Hazardous Waste Manifests are included as Appendix rfrfrf o ,this report. ffffJ-UUUH I* _•*. — • > • - . • . • . -

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

8/12/88 Sr. OSC Benton Wilmoth recognized the threat to humanhealth and the environment posed by the drums of paintwastes and waste solvents at the former Ray York AutoBody Shop in Oak Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia.The OSC enacted the $50,000 Delegation of Authority(14-1-A) for mitigative actions at the site, thenissued Delivery Order Number 7445-03-004 to ERCS for$35,000 to initiate removal actions at the site.

The OSC and Roy F. Weston's Technical Assistance Team(TAT) arrived on scene at 1400 hours this date. ERCSnotified the OSC of contractual difficulties betweenO.K. Materials and AMO Pollution Services whichresulted in the mobilization being postponeduntil 1700 hours.

8/13/87 AMO Pollution Services arrived on scene at 0800 hoursto begin cleanup operations. AMO personneltransferred solid and liquid waste from origin drumsinto removal drums then sealed, decontaminated, andlabeled the drums for transportation. The stainedsoil was removed from the vicinity of the drums andwas drummed for transportation and disposal. TATmonitored and photo-documented all site activities.

Sr. OSC Wilmoth contacted WVDNR, and obtainedtemporary waste generator I.D. Number (#WVP000000800).The OSC also contacted EPA Office of Public Affairs(OPA) to update on site activities.

8/14/87 ERCS completed transfer of wastes from origin drums toremoval drums. A total of twenty-one (21) drums ofwaste material resulted from the cleanup. ERCSperformed post-cleanup sampling on the removal areathen loaded the drums for transport to AMO PollutionServices TSD in Canonsburg, PA to await final disposalacceptance.

The OSC signed State of Pennsylvania, Hazardous WasteShipping Manifest, (PAB 3320376) and all wastes fromdrums and surrounding contaminated soils weretransported to TSD. All personnel demobilized fromthe site 1200 hours this date.

10/16/87 The OSC and TAT received the analytical data from the8/14/87 post-cleanup sampling from O.H. Materials'Laboratory, Findlay, OH. The results indicated highconcentrations of benzene, toluene, and xylenes werestill present in the soil upon which the origin drumswere staged and prompted the OSC to requestremobilization of the ERCS contractor andcomplete the removal.

1/24/88 The OSC, TAT and ERCS mobilized to the Holiday Inn,Oak Hill, WV, at 2200 hours this date. A conferencewas held between all participating parties andlogistics of cleanup operations were discussed.

1/25/88 The OSC, TAT and ERCS arrived on scene at 0800 hoursto begin cleanup operations. ERCS/AMO excavated,drummed, and staged fifteen (15) drums of solvent-contaminated soil inside the former Ray York Shopto await acceptance from their TSD facility.The building was secured by ERCS.

TAT and ERCS conducted an extent-of-contaminationstudy with sampling as small pockets of concentratedliquid solvent wastes were evident in the removedsoil. The samples were sent to Antech LTD LaboratoryServices in Export, PA, for analysis.

The OSC contacted WVDNR (Zeiss) and obtainedprovisional waste generator ID! WVT000000836. The OSCalso contacted EPA/OPA Ray Germann and briefed on siteactivities.

2/4/88 EPA/OPA was notified by an Oak Hill city officialthat persons unknown forced entry into the Ray YorkAuto Body Shop on 2/3/88. Inside, fifteen (15) drumsof solvent-contaminated soil remained staged awaitingacceptance from AMO/TSD.

The OSC requested prompt removal of the drums tomitigate the threat and coordinated TAT and AMOServices to mobilize to site for the removal andtransportation of the drums to a final disposalfacility.

ERCS Response Manager (Porco), obtained approval todispatch the fifteen (15) drums of contaminated soilto ThermalKEN in Rock Hill, SC.

2/6/88 TAT and ERCS arrived on scene at 1200 hours this date.AMO transferred fifteen (15) drums of soilcontaminated with paint wastes staged in the Ray YorkShop to a box truck for transport to TSD where twenty-one (21) drums from the initial removal were picked upfor transport to ThermalKEM.

2/7/88 A total of thirty-six (36) drums were transported toThermalKEM for final disposal.

2/16/88 Analysis of the eight (8) extent-of-contaminationsamples collected on 1/25/88 was completed by AntechLTD Laboratory Services, Inc. and sent to OSC and TATfor review. Upon review of the data OSC

determined concentrations of benzene, toluene, andxylene found in the samples were insignificant andposed no threat to human health or the environment.

The OSC remitted a copy of the analytical results toBill Jones, resident adjacent the Ray York Shop. Mr.Jones requested a copy of the report as his yard wassampled on 1/25/88 as part of the extent-of-contamination survey.

Based on the lab data, the OSC determined that furtherremoval actions were unwarranted.

4/18/88 The OSC determined that additional monies werenecessary to complete the final disposal of thethirty-six (36) drums at ThermalKEM disposal facility.TAT assisted the OSC in the preparation of anadditional funding request for $50,000 to cover thedisposal costs and submitted the document to the EPARegional Administrator for approval.

4/22/88 The Regional Administrator, James M. Seif, approvedthe Additional Funding Request for $50,000 to completethe disposal of the thirty-six (36) drums at ThermalKEM.The new approved total project ceiling became$100,000.

ARI00021*

looo e__ 1000 aooo xoo 4000 MOO tooo TOOO rtrI KIIOMCTCR

RAY YORK AUTO BODY DRUM SITEOAK HILL, FAYETTE CO.

WEST VIRGINIA

SCALE1___________2 MILES

1 INCH • 1 M1UEO 1______2 3 KILOMETERS

t CCNTIMCTKA m O.433 KtUOMCTCR

RAY YORK AUTO BODY DRUM SITEOAK HILL( FAYETTE CO.

WEST VIRGINIA ^_"' T)26

VC<K UTO fiooy— of u/ns o' r*x»r

RAY YORX flu-re BODY SHOP DRUM 5iTEOflK HlLL, FftVETTE

Vcsr

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIOREGION III

841 Chestnut BuildingPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

SUBJECT- SPECIAL BULLETIN A AUG 20 1987SUBJECT. Ray yorjc Body shop Drum site . ^ DATE: *Uu *"Oak Hill, Fayette County,

FROM: /-Benton M> wiinoth, OSC /Emergency Response and Preparedness fspfytffoii (3HW22)

TO: Project File

THRU: Thomas I. Massey. ChiefEmergency Response and Preparedness/Section (3HW22)

THRU: Thomas C. Voltaggio, ChiefSuperfund Branch (3HW20)

THRU: Stephen R. Wassersug, DirectorHazardous Waste Management Divisio

I. INTRODUCTION

An inspection performed in accordance with the NationalContingency Plan has identified an immediate and significantrisk of harm to human health and the environment posed by thepresence of twenty (20) drums of paint wastes in solventswhich were found to have been illegally dumped by the formerowner of the body shop facility. The drums are partiallyopened and left uncontrolled with unrestricted access on thebankrupt property In Oak.Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia.

Section 104 of CERCLA calls for the initiation of immediateremoval where there is a threat of a release of a hazardoussubstance which may present an imminent and substantial dangerto public health or welfare.

The Delegation of Authority 14-1-A (4/8/86) authorizesthe OSC to approve CERCLA removals with a total cost of lessthan $50,000. The OSC, therefore, approved the use of CERCLAfunds at this site to mitigate the threat to human health andthe environment by securing and removing the hazardous unknownsubstance and contaminated solid to proper storage and disposal.

ARI00028

-2-

II. BACKGROUND

The Ray York Auto Body Drum Site is an abandoned autobody facility in which the former owner performed cruderefining on waste paint thinners and solvents. The site wasreferred to the WVDNR by local concerned citizens due to thefact that the facility ie centrally in a moderately sizedhousing development and the drums are uncontrolled and accessto the site is unrestricted. Pam Hayes, WVDNR Hazardous WasteDivision, contacted OSC Benton Wilmoth to request EPA involve-ment into the matter. The OSC tasked TAT with making a pre-liminary assessment based on the reports from the WVDNR. Tenof the twenty drums found proved to be empty while two otherswere sealed firmly. The remaining drums were filled with anorange yellow paint sludge in solvent. The waste product hasspilled from those drums and created a large stain under thedrums. Upon the initial TAT assessment, the open drums elicitedHNU readings up to 300 ppra.

III. THREAT

The threat of direct human contact, inhalation, and ingestionof lead and related heavy metals and. vlatile organics issubstantial. Analytical data received on the samples taken onthe July 1, 1987 TAT assessment confirm observations of paintwaste in solvents as the HSL metals analysis showed total leadconcentrations at 973 rog/kg in a representative drum sampleand also total chromium concentrations in the same sampleof 173 mg/kg which is indicative of commercial paint waste.The volatile organics analysis of the drum samples indicatehigh organic solvent concentrations such as acetone at 670 ppro;toluene at 3200 ppra; ethylbenzene at 230 ppm; and total zylenesof 1000 ppm.

The drums are located directly adjacent to the Body Shopand access to them is totally unrestricted. The drums are alsouncontrolled as some of them are partially or entirely openedand spillage resulted in a large stain directly under and aroundthe site. The site is frequented by local children as signs ofvandalism at the site are present as is a well worn bicycle pathdirectly through the property. During the TAT assessment,several children were observed walking through the site aswell as walking in the auto body shop itself.

ARI00029

-3-

IV. SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of work proposed for implementation with theemergency delegation appropriation includes 1. Overpacking andremoving the contaminated drum; 2. Removal of contaminatedsoil into drums; 3. Temporary storage at a RCRA approvedTSD facility until such time as final disposal is arranged.

The authorized budget for this 50K removal is:

EPA $ 2,500EPA Hq. (15%) 7,500TAT 5,000ERCS 35/000TOTAL $50,000

V. OSC ACTION

On August 12, 1987 the OSC issued Delivery Order 17445--3-004 to ERCS in the amount of $35,000 to initiate removalactions aimed at mitigating the threat to human health and theenvironment.

*At this time, no Potential Responsible Parties (PRP) have

been identified as the former business is in bankruptcy and theproperty is owned by HUD.

Because the conditions of the Ray York Body Shop DrumSite meet the conditions of Section 300.665 of the NationalContingency Plan for an immediate removal, the OSC has approvedthis immediate removal action.

ARIQOQ30

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTALREGION III

841 Chestnut BuildingPhiladelphia. Pennsylvania 19107

Justification for Additional Funding Request\^ of CERCLA Removal at the Ray York Body

SUBJECT: shop Drum Site DATE: JPR 22 1983Oak Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia

FROM: /ames M. Seif J C -Adm£nTstrator (3RA00)yit

*"fTO: Dr. J. Winston Porter, Assistant Administrator

Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (Wh-548-B)

PURPOSE

Pursuant to the Delegation of Authority 14-1-A, (9/13/87),as amended by Section 401 (E) of Superfund Amendments andReauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) which authorizes theRegional Administrator to approve CERCLA Removal Actionswith a total cost of less than $2,000,000, I have approvedan increase of the Ray York Body Shop Drum Site in theamount of $50,000. The new approved total project ceiling isnow $100,000.

Attachment

flRIOOOSI

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

841 Chestnut BuildingIL-JJ^J , . *i Philadelphia,Pennsylvania 19107Additional Funding Request for theRay York Body Shop Drum Site

SUBJECT.Oak Hill, Fayette County, West Tia DAT£. ARR

Benton M. Wilmoth, SeniorFROM: Emergency Response Section.

James'M. SelfTO: Regional Administrator (33

THRU Stephen R. Wassersug, DifecCoi. ,Hazardous Waste Management Division (3HW00)

ISSUE

Additional funds are required to continue response actionsassociated with this site. An estimated $50,000 will be requiredto complete removal, transportation, and storage of accumulatedhazardous paint wastes and waste solvents to a RCRA approved TSDfacility. This will include disposal analysis of the unknownmaterials and final disposal of an estimated 36 drums ofhazardous waste industrial products.

BACKGROUND

On June 11, 1987, the West Virginia Department of NaturalResources (WVDNR) Division of Waste Management notified OSCWilmoth regarding the presence of unlabeled, potentiallyleaking drums which had been abandoned at the former site of theRay York Auto Body Shop. The former owner of the shop performedcrude refining on waste paint thinners and solvents. The sitewas referred to WVDNR by local concerned citizens becausethe facility is located in a moderately sized housing develop-ment and is in an area easily accessible to children.

OSC Wilmoth directed the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) toperform a preliminary assessment based on the reports from WVDNR*Ten of the twenty drums found proved to be empty while two otherswere firmly sealed. The remaining drums were filled with anorange-yellow paint sludge in solvent. The waste product fromthose drums had spilled and created a large stain around thedrums. Open the initial TAT assessment, the open drums elicitedHNU readings up to 300 ppm.

AR100032

(2)

The TAT witnessed children playing in and around the abandonedshop adjacent the drums. Due to the hazards associated with theabove mentioned substances to human health by contact and to theenvironment by offsite migration, the OSC activated the emergencyprovisions of CERCLA using the delegated $50,000 Authority (14-1-A). Subsequently, the OSC issued Delivery Order No. 7445-03-004to Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) in the amount of$35,000 to initiate removal actions aimed at mitigating thethreat to public health and the environment. The drums emittedvapors, some were without bungs, and spillage was evident whichnecessitated soil excavation. Consequently, with the removal ofthe hazardous materials, temporary storage, and final disposalcosts, additional funds are necessary to complete the emergencyremoval action.

THREAT

The threat of direct human contact, inhalation, andingestion of lead and related heavy metals and volatile organicsis substantial. Analytical data received on the samples takenduring the July 1, 1987 TAT assessment confirmed observations ofpaint waste in solvents. The HSL metals analysis showed totallead concentrations at 973 mg/kg in a representative drum sampleas well as total chromium concentrations in the same sample of173 mg/kg, indicative of commercial paint waste. The volatileorganics analysis of the drum samples indi9ated high organicsolvent concentrations such as acetone at 670 ppm; toluene at3200 ppm; ethylbenzene at 230 ppm; and total xylenes of 1000 ppm.

The drums are staged adjacent the Ray York Body Shop whichis centrally located among homes of a recently built housingdevelopment. Local children walk or ride bicycles on the Yorkproperty and come near the drum area. Spillage from the drumsinfiltrated the soil, stressed the vegetation, and created a matof paint approximately 10'X 30' X 0.75".

ACTIONS TAKEN TO DATE

Work performed to date under the Delegation of AuthorityFunding includes contractor mobilization; preparation of stagingarea with vlsqueen and banner guard; transfer of materials fromoriginal drums of poor integrity into twenty-one (21) ERCSoverpacks and staging drums in TSD; remobilization to the siteto perform additional excavation resulting in fifteen (15) drumsof contaminated soil which were staged and secured onsite.The thirty-six (36) total drums were transported to a finaldisposal facility where disposal operations are currently underway and are expected to exceed the ERCS contract celling.

AR100033

(3)

PROPOSED ACTION

The OSC has determined that additional monies are necessary^_s to compete the final disposal of the thirty-six drums at Thermal

Kern final disposal facility.

PROPOSED BUDGET

EXTRAMURAL COSTSERCS 4,000(36 drums @$800/drums) 28,800

ERCS TOTAL 32,800

TAT Costs $4,200Subtotal, Extramural Direct Costs 37,00015% Contingency 6,000

Total Extramural Costs 43,000

INTRAMURAL COSTS

Intramural Direct Costs 2,580Intramural Indirect Costs , 4,420

TOTAL INTRAMURAL COSTS 7,000

i j TOTAL ADDITIONAL FUNDS $50,000CURRENT CEILING 50,000NEW PROJECT CEILING . • $100,000

ENFORCEMENT STATUS

The person(s) responsible for this illegal dumping arebeing investigated. The OSC continues communication with EPAEnforcement and EPA Office of Criminal Investigation regardingidentification of potential responsible parties.

"EFFORTS TO CONTRIBUTE TO REMEDIAL PERFORMANCEThe Remedial Program has not been involved with this site

to date. However, the actions taken and all future actionswill be consistent with any future remedial efforts.

AR 100031*

(4)

REGIONAL RECOMMENDATION

Because conditions at the Ray York Drum Site, in Oak Hill,West Virginia meet the criteria as set forth in Section 300.65of the National Contingency Plan, I recommend your approval of thisadditional funding request. The estimated costs are $50,000 ofwhich $43,000 are -extramural costs.

You may indicate your approval or disapproval by signing

' "———**-*%,/ / / ^ '£~" £-""Zx< DATE

DISAPPROVED DATE

fiRI00035

SITE/SAFETY PROTOCOLRay York Auto Body Site

Oak Hill, Fayette County, West Virginia

GENERAL

This protocol addresses the safety procedures that will be followed byany and all personnel visiting the site or involved in the CERCLAremoval activity at the Ray York Body Shop. All personnel enteringthe site shall read and sign this safety plan. The protocol willremain in effect until the OSC certifies that the activity isterminated* It does not supercede any Federal OSHA or state or localregulations but is in addition to them. In the event of aconflict between this protocol and a regulation, the more stringent ofthe two will be in force.

Since data available at the present time does not allow a completecharacterization of the drums on the site, levels ofprotection for personnel will be set in accordance with the hazard ofthe job function and location on-site as indicated on the attacheddiagram.

Respiratory Protection Program

All contractor and governmental personnel involved in on-siteactivities shall have a written respiratory protection program andprove that they are physically fit to wear a respirator* Allpersonnel wearing air-purifying respirators on-site are required to befit tested, while those wearing pressure-demand self -containingbreathing apparatus or air-line apparatus, must be properly trainedand experienced in their use. All respiratory protection equipment isto be properly decontaminated at the end of each workday.

Persons having beards or facial hair must_not wear a respirator.

Trainina_and Medical_Monitorina_Procrram

Personnel will have both formal training and on-the-job training,in accordance with OSHA regulations, for those tasks they areassigned to perform on the active site . All unfamiliaractivities will be rehearsed beforehand.

All contractor and governmental personnel who are exposed to hazardouslevels of chemicals shall prove that they are enrolled in a medicalmonitoring program.

.00036

Ray York Body ShopOak Hill, Fayette Co., West Virginia

Page 2> General Safety_Rules_and_Eouipment

a. There will be no eating, drinking or smoking in the Exclusion Areaor hot side of the Contamination Reduction Area.

b. Ail personnel must pass through the Contamination Reduction Areato enter the Exclusion Area.

c. An emergency eye wash will be on the hot side of the ContaminationReduction Area.

d. As a minimum, an emergency deluge shower/spray can is to belocated on the clean side of the Contamination Reduction Area.

e. At the end of the work, all personnel working in the ExclusionArea shall take a hygenic shower.

f. All supplied breathing air shall be certified as Grade D orbetter.

g. Where practical, all tools/equipment will be spark proof, explosionresistant and/or bonded and grounded.

1

h. Fire extinguishers will be on-site for equipment or personnel firesonly..

i. A first-aid kit will be on-scene at all times during operationalhours. An oxygen inhalator respirator will be available. Thelocation of these items on-site will be posted.

j. Persons having beards or facial_hair must not wear respirators *

k. Ho work will be performed in the exclusion area during hours ofdarkness as determined by the site safety officer.

Moming_Safetv Meeting

A morning safety meeting will be conducted each day for all sitepersonnel who sign a daily attendance sheet. The safety procedures,evacuation procedures, and escape procedures, as well as the day'splanned operations, should be discussed.

ARI00037


Page 3CONTROL-AT THE SITE

Access to the site will be restricted by a site security officer andbanner guard installed during the immediate removal phase at this siteand exit from the site shall be through the gate in the ContaminationReduction Area except in a 1ife-threatening emergency*

All persons entering the site shall sign in and out at the OSC commandpost or with the site security officer.

DESIGNATION OF WORK AREAS AT THE_SITE

The entire site will be divided into three areas: (l) Exclusion Areawhich known to be or have a potential for becoming contaminated:(2) the Contamination Reduction Area where decontamination ofpersonnel and equipment exiting the Exclusion Area is performed;(3) the Support Area which is not contaminated.

The Exclusion_Area (EA)At the Ray York Body Shop, the Exclusion Area shallinitially include all areas inside the banner guard.

The Contamination Reduction_Area (CRA)At the Ray York Body Shop,the Contamination ReductionArea will be located immediately outside the Exclusion areaand will be delineated by roped off area.

The Support Area (SA)At the Ray York Body Shop, the Support Area will be thearea outside the Exclusion Area and Contamination Reduction Area.

Changes_in_Designation_of_Work-Areas

As work progress on-side, the OSC may determine that an areapreviously designed an EA is no longer classified in that manner. Itis not intended, however, to change the designation of the CRA sincethis may involve the movement of the decontamination facilities andadded expense.

SAFETY PROCEDURES AND LEVELS OF PROTECTION

Exclusion Area

1. All personnel shall enter and_exit the Exclusion Area through theContamination Reduction Area.

2. Emergency escape routes from the Exclusion Area will beestablished and reviewed as appropriate at each morningsafety meeting. AR I 00038


Page 4

SAFETY PROCEDURES AND LEVELS OF PROTECTION (continued)

Exclusion_Area *

3. All personnel in the Exclusion Area shall use the protectiveequipment designed for their job function but in no case shallless than LEVEL c be used.

4. Personnel performing the following job functions in theExclusion Area will utilize the designed level of protectionequipment.

Contamination Reduction Area

1. Personnel and equipment decontamination will be performed inLevel C.

2 . All personnel entering the CRA will utilize a minimum ofLevel C protection.

3. All personnel entering the CRA must decontaminate which willbe performed in Level C.

4. All equipment entering the CRA must be decontaminated prior toleaving the CRA.

Support Area

1. No contaminated equipment or personnel may enter the Support Area

2. Except in the case of a release of a Toxic vapor, Level_P willbe appropriate for all personnel in the Support Area.

Prime_Contractor

1. Barrel opening, sampling, and overpacking will be performed inLevel B. This applies to anyone involved, including equipmentoperators.

DECONTAMINATION PROTOCOL

All equipment and personnel entering the site must be thoroughlydecontaminated prior to leaving the site. Since there are variousprotocol and equipment available for this purpose, the OSC willdetermine if the proposed decontamination techniques areapplicable. Such determinations will be made on a day-to-day basis as on-site operations dictate.

fiRI-00039


Page 5

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

In the event of a medical or other emergency, the OSC or his designeewill notify the appropriate authority. The following list of phoneof numbers will be posted prominently at each telephone on-site:1. Fire (304) 465-0596

2. Ambulance (304) 465-8700

3. Police (304) 465-0596

4. Federal Government (215) 597-9898

5. EPA Environmental Response Team (201) 321-6649

6. Hospitals (304) 465-0551

WESTOK SPER DIVTSIQKHAZARDOUS WASTE SITE INVESTIGATION AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

Assignor; J gKrroo uJit-wmi___________ REGIONDate of Inspection: l ne. " Tine: "~TODOriginal Safety Plan: Yes lx aKo~ Modification Ko.

Site Nane:_ _kAT Tcr*. SCDY SrtOPSite Address: Street Ko.

cityV

State uV o-r Vv<t6.r»nA _____Zip Code,

Site Contact; V*M U *1<?s vWbflg Phone fcor

Directions to Site: ______

Kap Attached: Yes _If Remote Location: Latitude _______liongitudeSITE HISTORY:

INCIDENT DESCRIPTION

TYPE: A) Spill____,Air Release___ Fire____ HW Site \S Other

B) Assessaent_ ^ Sampling S Emergency Response____Clean-up/Removal Other (specify)____________

C) Urban/Residential S Commercial___ Industrial__Rural Remote,

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION

Size of Site: /6fl'*Sc/ Terrain; FZrtT Weather C H

Containers Involved in the Release or Incident

Drums / Ko. B_ Tanks___ No._

Truck___ License No.___ Tanker___ Box_Railroad Car___ Tank No.___ Box No.___

*

Spill___Source,Other Id -

MATERIALS INVOLVED;

IDLH Overexposure Symptoms

SPECIAL HAZARDS:

ANTICIPATED LEVEL OF PROTSCTION (circle one) : A ($,> C D

U/I If MOW O

FIRST AID INSTRUCTIONS FOR KNOWN CONTAMINANTS;

PERSONNEL EXPOSURE HAZARDS; (H-high, K-nodcratc, l -low, U-unXnown)

Inhalation [ Skin Contact H Ingestion \A Radioactive__

Biological___ Fire___ Explosion___ Unknown \\PERSONNEL PHYSICAL SAFETY HAZARDS:

Heat L^^Cold___ Koise___ Underground Utilities___

Overhead Utilities___ Heavy Equipment___ Slip, Trip, Fall_

Sharp Objects __ Pressurized Airlines___ Cyclinders,___Ladders___ Scaffolds___ Unguarded Openings-Wall, Floor__

Liquids in Open Containers, Ponds, Lagoons J

fifUOOOl*2

ACTIONS TAKEK OK SITE:

Was Entry Made: YES / NO___

Equipment Used: (circle) LEVEL A (B C D WHY;

/ APR Model_____ Cart./Can. Type

Tyvefc___ Poly Tyvek___ Saran Twefc Acid Suit

Rain Gear____ Cotton Coveralls______

Gloves: Inner S Butyl i/ Nitrile____ Viton___ Other.Foot Gear: Safety Boots /* Outer Boots___ Booties / Other,.

Description of Decontamination Used: __________________

AIR MONITORING Performed by; A/-r*ig HA

Instrument Readings: Radiation Meter_____ CGI_______

OVA____ KKU v Detector Tube.

Other ________ ____Wind: Speed___ Direction___ Temp.___ Rel. Hun.____ B.P.,

Summarize Air Monitoring Data /» pgg*.rr*tf»f/»«-*/ *j<n.gryecoA^ *£ rueTH f MWL) P^

SAMPLING Performed by:Sampling Plan (Y or N) Jy If V attach copy to safety planNo. of Samples: Solid Liquid S* Gas ____ Other

Laboratory :Has Lab Been Notified of Potential Hazard Level? Ves V No.

Analyses:_Jsailing co^ts: ABIOODU3

DOCUMENTATION Performed by:

Type: Photo l*-" Log Book lx Recorder_____ Video

PUBLIC IMPACT-sr 'Distance to Nearest: Residence SO School_____ Hospital.

Public Building_____ Other ____Evacuation: Yes___ No Number__ By Whom:_________

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

Nearest Waterway:_____________________Distance!___

Condition Observed Potential None

Surface Water Contamination mGround Water ContaminationDrinking Water ContaminationAir Contamination ____Soil Contamination XStressed Vegetation . x.Dead Fish, other Animals

PERSONNEL INVOLVED; (NAME, AGENCY, PHONE, ON or OFF SITE)

SITE MANAGER;______________________________________________________

SITE SAFETY COORDINATOR! /M\Kf HAVZLKA__________________________

Have Read & Understood TheSite Safety Plan (check)

EPA

fflttL LklMJ\b **~~Mite ttfivel*.* u--

TAT

. __________________^^_______________ v^

STATE _____ _^__

EMERGENCY INFORMATION

EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBERS;Location Phone Notified

PolicGAmbulance

. Hospital

Nearest PhoneDIRECTIONS TO HOSPITAL!

(ATTACH MAP)

ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY PHONE CONTACTS;

CHEMTKEC (800) 424-9300TSCA HOTLINE (800) 424-9065,(202)554-1404CDC (404) 452-4100 (Day), (404) 329-2888 (Night)BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & FIREARMS (800) 424-9555, (202) 566-7777NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER (800) 424-8802WESTON MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICE (513) 421-3063WESTON 24 HOUR HOTLINE (215) 524-1925, 1926PESTICIDE INFORMATION SERVICE (800) 845-7633EPA ERT EMERGENCY (201) 321-6660RCRA HOTLINE (800) 424-9346BUR. OF EXPLOSIVES, A. A. RAILWAYS (202) 835-9500

Prepared by;Reviewed by :

Approved by;

SPER HSO Reviewed b y : _ ^ D a t e : ^Followup Required: Yes_Followup Performed: Date:,Comments: ___

ARIOOOl*5

APPENDIX E *ANALYTICAL RESULTS

A H O O O i e

b'..S. EPA Contract Laboratory ProgramSample Management Office<209 Madison St. - Alexandria, VA 22314703/557-2490 FTS: 6-557-2490

COVER PAGElEQRGASIC ANALYSIS DATA PACKAGE . .

Lab Same ROCKY KOUTTAIff ANALYTICAL Case Ho. .________SOW Vo. _______764__________ QC Report Ho. 87022

Sample numbers

EPA Ho. Lab ID So. EPA No, Lab ID Ho.

KCJ351D ________ _______

KCJ351

KCJ351S

MCJ352

KCJ353

KCJ354

CKCJ9991

Comments: 4 KEDIUH SOILS FOR TOTAL KETALS AKALYSIS______SERIAL DILPTIOH OP SAKPLE KCJ352 IS IDENTIFIED AS CKCJ999]"

ICP Interelement and background corrections applied? Yes X Ko . ,If yes, corrections applied before X or after generation" ! raw"TISta.Footnotes;££ - not required by contract at this timeFora I:Value - \t.the.respites, a.value greater than.or equal to the :,nstrunent

U

nc; catesn<: can< : cates,ad<: tion itn<; ca ;esndicates

:es

detection limit but less than the contract required de-;ectionlimit, report the value inbrackets (i.e.. U03K Indicate thenethod used,with P (for TCP/Flame AA> or F (for furnacis). ^ .ndicates element was analyzed xor but not detected. Report wixn.he detection limit j&ive le.g.( 100).ncicates a value j estimated or not reported due to the presence ofn-.erference Expi.anatory note included on Qover page.^n<: ca.es va ye deêrminea by Meijflrij f Standard Ao«£f$n.

e samplecorre; ,ess titan e.99;o d vapor.utomated Spectr

Fora I 00002EPA Sample Ko.

KCJ351-U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory ProgramSample Management Office209 Madison St. - Alexandria, VA 22314703/557-2490 FTS: 8-557-2490

Date 6-10-67

IHORGAHIC AHALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB HAME ROCKY MOUHTAIH AHALYTICAL CASE HO. 7642SOV JfO. _____764__________LAB SAMPLE ID. HO. - QC REPORT ffO. 87022»

Elements Identified and Measured

Concentration: Low _____ Medium XMatrix: Vater _____ Soil X Sludge _____ Other _____

mg/kg dry weight

1. ALUM I HUM______4760_____P 13. MAG1TESIUM_____C3201 P

2. AHTIMOKY______15U_____P 14. MAHGA5ESE • 234_____P

3, ARSEfflC______6.2U F 15. .MERCURY______0.12U CV

4. BARIUM _______[593_____P 16. NICKEL________4.9U P

5. BERYLLIUM_____0.62U P 17. POTASSIUM_____C4633 P

6. CADMIUM_______2.5U_____P 18. SELEEIUM 3.1U F

7. CALCIUM_______C16101 P 19. SILVER________2.5U P

8. CHROMIUM______7.2_____P 20. 50DITO_______673U P

9. COBALT 5.6U P 21. THALLIUM______6.2U F

10. COPPER_______16______P 22. TIK__________14U_____P R

11. IROE_________6320 P 23. YAffADIUM______C103 P

12. LEAD_________45______P 24. ZIHTC_________69______P

Cyanide ________ffR__________ Percent Solids <%) 81__________

Footnotes: For reporting results to EPA, standard result qualifiers areused as defined on Cover Page. Additional flags or footnotesexplaining results are encouraged. Definition of such flagsmust be explicit and contained on Cover Page, however.

Comments: ____ ______!_________________BR 1000U8_ - -

Lab Manager iff-frrLu

Form I

U.S. EPA Contract Laboratory ProgramSample Management Office209 Madison St. - Alexandria, VA 22314703/557-2490 FTS: 6-557-2490

00003

EPA Sample Ho.MCJ352

Date 6-10-87


LAB HAME ROCKY MOUHTAIH AHALYTICAL CASE HO, 7642SOV HO. ____ 784LAB SAMPLE ID. HO. QC REPORT HO, 87022



mg/fcg dry weight

1. ALUMIHUM ______ 5240 P 13. MAGHESIUM _____ C1490] P

2. AHT1MOHY ______ 19U _____ P 14. MASGAHESE _____ 520 _____ P

3. ARSEHIC _______ 29 ______ PS 15. MERCURY _______ 0.15U CV»4. BARIUM _______ 244 _____ P 16. NICKEL _______ t273 P

5. BERYLLIUM 0.77U P 17. POTASSIUM C 12301 P

6. CADMIUM _______ 13 ______ P 18. SELENIUM ______ 3.8U

7. CALCIUM _______ C 1730 3 P 19. SILVER _______ 3.1U

8. CHROMIUM ______ 52 ______ P 20. SODIUM _______ 838U

9. COBALT ________ C233 P 21. THALLIUM ______ 7.7U

10. COPPER ________ 80 ______ P 22. T1H ______ 17U

11. IROH _________ 239C0 P 23. VAHADIUM ______ C9.63

12. LEAD _________ 614 _____ P 24. 2IHC _________ 2980

Cyanide ________ HR __________ Percent Solids <%) 65


Comments: ft

————————————————————————— . i ,. —————— ¥-+A —————————Lab Manasrer f t(J

Form I 00004

EPA Sample Ho.MCJ353


Date 8-10-87

IHORGAHIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

LAB HAME ROCKY MOUHTAIH AHALYTICAL CASE HO. 7642SOV HO. ________784__________LAB SAMPLE ID. HO. QC REPORT HO. 87022


Concentration: Low ____ Medium XMatrix: Vater _____ Soil X Sludge Other _____

mg/fcg dry weight

1. ALUM I HUM______10600 P 13. MAGHESIUM_____C15101 P

2. AHTIMOHY______14U_____P 14. MAHGAKESE • 328_____P

3, ARSEHIC______27 P5 15. MERCURY_______1.1_____CV

4. BARIUM________161 _____P 16. HICKEL 23______P

5. BERYLLIUM C1.43 P 17. POTASSIUM_____3430 P

6. CADMIUM______2.2U P 18. SELENIUM •_____2.8U F

7, CALCIUM_______C 2290 3 P 19. SILVER________2.2U P

8. CHROMIUM______14______P 20. SODIUM_______[7503 P

9. COBALT________C15J_____P 21. THALLIUM______5.6U F

10. COPPER_______31______P 22. TIH__________12U_____P R

11. IROH_________22800 P 23, VAN AD I OH______C171 P

12. LEAD_________ 81______P 24. ZINC__________404_____P

Cyanide ________HR__________ Percent Solids (%) 90 _________


Comments:~ n — .

Lab Manager UAJ

Form I


00005EPA Sample Ho.

MCJ354

Date 8-10-87


LAB HAME ROCKY MOUHTAIH AHALYTICAL CASE HO. 7642SOW HO. 784LAB SAMPLE ID. HO. - - QC REPORT HO. 87022



mg/kg dry weight

1. ALUMIHUM 1300 P 13. MAGHESIUM E8521 P

2. AHTIMOHY ______ 15U _____ P 14. MANGANESE _____ 80 ______ P

3. ARSEHIC _______ 5.8U F 15. MERCURY _______ 7.4 _____ CV«4. BARIUM ________ 266 _____ P 16. HICKEL ________ [203 P

5. BERYLLIUM _____ 0.58U P 17. POTASSIUM _____ C11903 P

6. CADMIUM _______ 1030 P 18. SELEHIUM ______ 2.9U F

7. CALCIUM _______ 10200 P 19. SILVER ________ 2.3U P

8. CHROMIUM ______ 251 _____ P 20. SODIUM _______ [1620] P

9. COBALT ________ 59 ______ P 21. THALLIUM ______ 5.6U F

10. COPPER _______ 73 ______ P 22. TIK _________ 50 ______ P

11. IROH _________ 6460 P 23. VAHADIUM ______ 4.1U P

12. LEAD _________ 2220 P 24. 2IHC _________ 830 _____ P

Cyanide ________ HR __________ Percent Solids (%) 66


Comments: Vtvci^ ru* <* \i * ll/g- C*JP *t r T* «A **£• a**, QAiV+'i*™ -y • ATtiubusr-

HPLab Manasrer IJH/

iboooue

Q.C. Report Ho.1IITIAL ATO CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION*

LAB HAME ROCKY MOUTTAIH AHALYTICAL CASE HO.SOV 10. 764

DATE 1 > - « g n U H I T S ug/L

Compound Initial Calib.*-» Continuing Calibration*Metals:

1. ALUMIHUM2. AKTIMOHY3. ARSEHIC4. BARIUM5- BERYLLIUM6. GASNIUX7. CALCIUM8. (JHSGMHJM9. COBALT10. COPPER

i 11. IROH~12. LEAP13. XAGHESIUM14. JCAHGAIESE15. MERCURY16. yiCTCEL17. POTASSIUMId. SEL&AH/H19. SILVER20. SODIUX21. THALLIUM22. TUT23. VAHADIUM24. 2INCOther:

CYAHIDE

TrueValue1980109049I9604814894980050647454219904510250005131.0496502009850950700fir20005113100

Found

'

I

%R i Truei Value!100011000*11000:i000:i0001 100000:i000J 1000

!1000J1000

ttooo1100000:ic0011:i0001 100000!20110001100000!2011000:i000ii000ii:

Found

t 026|07<5

T5HlOUft*I *J1 G\ nrtA1030T*llOô?5?6(OOO1 oKosfc94n*?^^-l^ôto

45-\*\ f)«ft

^ 1"M**\ r»3b

%R

ICX3loT

Vfoi-1*»Inllo311?Io31*f\1«010^«n<\-»q

^tio\

(0 0nIo3

Found

'

%R

!tI

Met-hod*PF

PPPpPPPPfPPCVPPFPPFPPP

AS1 Initial Calibration Source ICV-1&3 s Continuing Calibration Source FISH3 Control Limits: Mercury and Tin 60-120; All Other Compounds 90-110* Indicate Analytical Method Used: P - ICP/Flame AA; F - FurnaceCV - Cold Vapor AS - Automated SpectrophotoanetriflR 100052

• Furnace Initial Calibration Source ICV 2&4 - - . . . _ .• Cyanide Initial Calibration Source ERA 9909

H. Materials Corp.

ANALYTICAL REPORT OW* n SL m i** 419-423-3526

Telex 298248 OHM1 tRiRCAi

OHM

CLIENT: USEPA Region IIIOak Hill, WV

ATTN:

OHM PROJECT NUMBER: 5162E SAMPLE TYPE: Solid Composite

OHM PROJECT MANAGER: J. Copus ANALYSIS PERFORMED:

Landfill Disposal (Sample SC01)

DATE COMPLETED: 9-23-87 DATE RECEIVED: 8-28-87

This report is "PROPRIETARY ASP CONFIDENTIAL" and delivered to, and intendedfor the exclusive use of, the above named client only. O.B. Materials Corp.assumes no responsibility or liability for the reliance hereon or use hereofby anyone other than the above named client.

All of the analyses and data interpretation that form the basis of this reportwas prepared under the direct supervision and control of the undersigned whois solely responsible for the contents and conclusions therein.

Reviewed andApproved by:

9 Manager Analytical Services Date

SRI00053

A Subsidiary of Environmental Treatment and Technologies Corp.

10-02-871

PROJECT 5162E

SUMMARY REPORT OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES

1. INTRODUCTION

O.K. Materials Corp. (OHM) Corporate Laboratory received onesoil sample from US EPA Region III, Oak Hill, West Virginia.This sample was acquired by OHM's technical personnel andtransferred to the laboratory complete with a chain-of-custody record, a copy of which is attached for reference.This sample was analyzed for Landfill Disposal parameters.

II. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

o Total PhenolsThe samples were prepared by accurately weighing anapproximate 20 g aliquot of each sample and then suspendthe solid in 500 ml Lab Grade I water. The pH of thesample solutions were adjusted to pH 4 with 1+9 phos-phoric acid, then 5 mis of 10% copper sulfate solutionwas added to each sample. Samples were mixed for onehour and prepared and analyzed according to EPA TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/ChemicalMethods, SW-846, July 1982; Method 9065, Phenolics(Spectrophotometric, Manual 4-AAP with Distillation).

. o GC/H5 Volatile Organic Analyses and ScreensVolatile analysis of the samples was performed usingmethods based on EPA Test Methods for Evaluating SolidWastes, Physical/ChemlFal Methods, SW-646, July 1982;Method 8240, GC/MS Methods for Volatile Organics.

o GC/MS Semi-Volatile Organic Analyses and ScreensAcid and base neutral extractables were prepared andanalyzed -using methods based on US EPA Test Methods forEvaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/ChemTcai Methods,SW-846, July 1982, Method 8210, GC/MS Methods torSemi-Volatile Organics. Extractions were performed byeither Method 3540, Soxhlet Extraction or Method 3550,

i Sonication Extraction.o Density - Densities of the samples were determined

according to Standard Methods for the Examination ofWater and Wastewater, 16th edition, 1985; Method 213E,Specific Gravity.

RRI0005U

10-02-873

PROJECT 5162E


RCRA Parameterso Metals - Samples were prepared and analyzed according to

USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes. Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-646, 2nd edition, July 198Z. Sampleswere prepared by either Method 3010, 3030, 3050, or 1310as appropriate for the following metals: arsenic, barium,cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver.Sample analyses for these metals were performed accordingto method 6010, Inductively Coupled Plasma Method (SW-846Proposed Sampling and Analytical Methodologies, 1984).

o Pesticides - Solid sample leachates were analyzed forpesticides according to Standard Methods for the Examina-tion of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, 1985; Method509A.

° Herbicides - Solid sample leachates were analyzed forpesticides according to Standard Methods for theExamination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, 1985;Method 509B.

»III. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The following tables detail the results of the variousanalyses performed on Sample I5162E-SC01.

RRI00055

10-02-872

PROJECT 5162E


Total Solids - Samples were analyzed according toStandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-water, 16th edition, 1985; Method 209F, Total, Fixed andVolatile Solids in Solid and Semi-solid Samples.Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides-Solid samples were analyzed and prepared according toUSEPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-B46, 2nd edition, 1982; Method 3550,Sonication Extraction or Method 3540, Soxhlet Extractionand Method 8080, Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs.Total and Amenable Cyanide - The samples were prepared byaccurately weighing an approximate 20 gra aliquot of eachsample into 500 ml of Lab Grade I water. The sampleswere adjusted to pK 12 and stirred for one hour. Thesamples were then analyzed according to USEPA TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, SW-846, 2nd edition,July 1982 (Revised April 1964); Method 9010, Total andamenable Cyanide and by Standard Methods for the Exami-nation of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, 1965;Method 412E Cyanide Selective Electrode Method.

pH - All samples that were water soluble were tested withpH strips to determine if they were corrosive as per EPA-600/4-84-038 (May 1984); Characterization of HazardousWaste Sites, Vol. III.

Sulfides - Sulfide analyses were performed according toEPA 600/4-84-038, Characterization of Hazardous WasteSites-A Methods Manual, May 1984; Section 17, G.I. 2.Determination of Sulfide in Solid Phase Hazardous WasteDisposal Site Samples.

Paint Filter Test - This test was performed on thesamples in accordance with Method 9095, Paint FilterLiquids Test; USEPA SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1982, TestMethods for Evaluating Solid wastes, Physical/ChemicalMethods'1

Flash Point - Flash points were performed at 60°Caccording to the procedure specified in USEPA TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/ChemicalHeTnods, SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1962; Method 1020,Seta-flash Closed-cup Method.

ARI00056

10-02-874

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 1 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL ANALYSIS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Soil CompositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-SC01

Parameter Resultmmmmmmmm*mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm*mmmm*

Color Brown

Odor Mild, Solvent

Flash Point, SF, CC 25°CDensity 1.31 gm/cm3

pH Test 6.0 pH units

Total Sulfide < 10 mg/Kg

Total Cyanide < 1.0 mg/KgAmenable Cyanide * < 1.0 mg/Kg

Total Phenols 9.26 mg/KgPaint Filter Test Pass

Total Solids 84.1% by weight

Total Organic Carbons 260,000 mg/Kg

ARI00057

1U-U4-B/5

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 2 - VOLATILE ORGANICS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Soil compositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-SC01

Compound Concentration (mg/Kg)

Benzene v BDLBromomethane BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLChloromethane BDLDibromochloromethane BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene • BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,1-Dichloroethane t BDL1,2-Dichloroethane BDL1,1-Dichloroethene BDLTrans-l,2-Dichloroethene BDL1,2-Dichloropropane BDLTotal Dichloropropenes BDLEthylbenzene 4,000Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethcne BDLToluene 21,800Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal xylenes 15,900

Limit of Detection - 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

fi{N00058

10-02-876

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 3 - VOLATILE HSL COMPOUNDS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Solid compositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-SC01

Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit (mg/Kg)

iAcetone BDL 500

Acrolein BDL 2,500

Acrylonitrile BDL 2,500

2-Butanone BDL 500

Carbon Disulfide BDL 100

Ethyl ether BDL 500

Ethylene Dibromide BDL 5002-Hexanone BDIi 500

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 500

Styrene BDL 500Tetrahydrofuran BDL 1,000

1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane BDL 250

Vinyl Acetate BDL 500

mg/Kg - ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

W00059C.

10-02-877

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 4 - VOLATILE SCREEN


Compound • Concentration (mg/Kg)

Aliphatic hydrocarbons ' 1,290

1-Propoxy-hexane 1,130

Limit of Detection - 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-nillion)BDL - Below Detection Limit

AR100Q6Q

10-02-878

PROJECT 5162ETABLE 5 - BASE/NEUTRXI" COMPOUNDS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Solid CompositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-SC01

Compound Concentration (mg/kg)

Acenaphthene BDLAcenaphthylene BDLAnthracene BDLBenzo(a)anthracene BDLBenzo(b)fluoranthene BDLBenzo(k)fluoranthene BDLBenzo(a)pyrene BDLBenzo(g,h,i)perylene BDLBis(2-chloroethyl)ether BDLBisj 2-chloroethoxy)methane BDLBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BDLBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BDL4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BDLButyl benzyl phthalate 9632-Chloronaphthalene BDL4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BDLChrysene BDLDibenzo(a,h)anthracene BDLDi-n-butylphthalate , BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL

^/ Diethylphthalate BDLDimethylphthalate BDL2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL2,6-Dinitrotoluene BDLDioctylphthalate BDL1,2-Diphenyl hydrazine BDLFluoranthene BDLFluorene BDLHexachlorobenzene BDLHexachlorobutadiene BDLHexachloroethane BDLHexachlorocyclopentadiene BDLIndeno-(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BDLIsophorone ' BDLNaphthalene 526Nitrobenzene BDLN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BDLN-Nitrosodiphenylamine BDLPhenanthrene BDLPyrene BDL1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BDLLimit of Detection - 100 mg/kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL • Below Detection Limit

AR 10006J

10-02-879

PROJECT S162E

TABLE 6 - ACID EXTRACTABLE



4-Chloro-3-Kethylphenol BDL2-Chlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dichlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dimethylphenol BDL2,4-Dinitrophenol BDL

2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol BDL

2-Nitrophenol BDL4-Nitrophenol * BDL

Pentachlorophenol BDL

Phenol BDL

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BDL

Limit of Detection - 100 »g/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

ARIQ0062

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 7 - ADDITIONAL SEMI-VOLATILE


Compound

AnilineBenzyl Alcohol4-ChloroanillneDibenzofuran

2-Methylnaphthalene

2-Methylphenol

4-Methylphenol,

2-Nitroaniline3-Nitroaniline

4-Nitroaniline

2,4, 5-Trichlorophenol

HSL COMPOUNDS

Concentration

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

BDL

10-02-8710

(mg/Kg)

Limit of Detection • 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

ARI00063

10-02-8711

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 8 - SEMI-VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS



Butyl acetate 733Ethylglycol acetate 1,870

Butylglycol acetate 974

Aliphatic hydrocarbons 1,005

Limit of Detection - 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)

ARI00061*

10-02-8712

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 9 - PESTICIDES AND PCBS


Concentration DetectionCompound Name mg/Kg Limit ng/Kgmmmmmmmmm———mm-mmm——mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmt

Aldrin BDL 0.1BHC-alpha BDL 0.1BHC-beta BDL 0.1BHC-gamma BDL 0.1BHC-delta BDL 0.1Chlordane BDL 1.04,4'-DDD BDL 0.14, 4 '-DDE BDL 0.14,4'-DDT BDL 0.1Dieldrin BDL 0.1Endosulfan-alpha BDL .0.1Endosulfan-beta BDL 0.1Endosulfan sulfate BDL 0.1Endrin * BDL 0.1Endrin Aldehyde BDL 0.1Heptachlor BDL 0.1Heptachlor Epoxide BDL 0.1Toxaphene BDL 1.0

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS

Aroclor 1016 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1221 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1232 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1242 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1248 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1254 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1260 BDL 1.0

mg/Kg » ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

AHI00065

10-02-8713

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 10 - RCRA PARAMETERS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: EP Toxicity Leachate; Solid compositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-SC01

Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/L) Limit (mg/L)

RCRA Metals

Arsenic 0.159 0.1Barium BDL 0.1Cadmium BDL 0.1Chromium BDL 0.1Lead BDL 0.1Mercury BDL 0.05Selenium BDL 0.1Silver BDL 0.1

Pesticides

Lindane BDL 0.001Endrin BDL 0.001Methoxychlor BDL 0.01Toxaphene BDL 0.01

Herbicides

2,4-D BDL 0.012,4,5-TP BDL 0.01

mg/L - ppm (parts-per-million)BDL • Below Detection Limit

ARI00066

10-02-8714

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 11 - TEST BULKING RESULTS


Test Bulking Parameters

Date of Test Bulk: 9-02-87

Samples Bulked: 673, 674, 675, 677, 678, 679, 681, 682,685, 688, 690

Temperature Rise: < 2.0°CGas Evolved: None observed

Precipitate: None observedGelling or Solidification: None observed

ARI00067

10-02-8715

PROJECT

QC SUMMARY

A. Conventionals:

Cyanide: 76.0%Total Phenols: 80.2%

B. GC/MS Priority Pollutant Volatile Organics:

BFB Tune File: See attachedSurrogate Recoveries:

Sample Blank Spike

1,2-Dichloroethane-d. 104 104 98.2Benzene-d. 106 104 98.9Toluene-d, 119 114 106BFB 121 114 113

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)

Benzene 97.0Bromomethane 101Bromodichloromethane , 110Bromoform 135Carbon Tetrachloride 122Chlorobenzene 102Chloroethane 98.42-Chloroethylvinyl ether 117Chloroform 102Chloromethane 92.6Dibromochloromethane 1321 , 2-Dichlorobenzene 1171 , 3-Dichlorobenzene 1111,4-Dichlorobenzene 1171,1-Dichloroethane 1091,2-Dichloroethane 91.41,1-Dichloroethene 117Trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 98.21,2-Dichloropropane 1031 , 3-Dichloropropenes 98.6Ethylbenzene 96.6Methylene Chloride 1091,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane 94*8Tetrachloroethene 97*41,1, 1-Trichloroethane 1071,1,2-Trichloroethane 86.0Trichloroethene 108Trichlorof luoromethane 115Toluene 93.8Vinyl Chloride 101 aoiAnnr^Total Xylenes 110 A R I 0 0 0 6 Q

10-02-8716

PROJECT S162E

QC SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries (in Percentages): ContinuedAdditional CompoundsMethyl ethyl Ketone 92.4Carbon Disulfide 104Acetone 60.0*Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 106Methyl Pentanone ' 94.8Xylenes 94.2Styrene

C. GC/MS Priority Pollutant Semi-volatile Organics:DFTPP Tune File: See attachedPercent Surrogate Recoveries:

Sample Blank2-Fluorophenol 89.2 111Phenol-d, 88.2 119Nitrobenzene-d. 83.2 1182-Fluorobiphenyl 96.7 t 1252,4, 6-Trlbromophenol 86.6 ' 119p-Te rpheny 1-dj 4D. Pesticides, Herbicides: Percent Spike Recoveries

Aldrin 52.0Lindane 62.0Toxaphene 59.02,4-D 88.02,4,5-TP 81.0B-BHC 79.6b-BHC 86.3Heptachlor 85.0

PCBs Recoveries: Aroclor 1254-165%E. Metals: Percent Spike Recoveries

Arsenic 100 94.5Barium 96.4 98.5Cadmium 108 106Chromium 104 103Lead 101 99.6Mercury 99.5 97.6Selenium 100 98.8Silver 101 100

ARI00069

ll« >A

"C100-

90-

ft&*

7 *

-CO-

40-•

30-

20-

"i

0760to

«9

iBu I0 '

00 Nt DFTPP 9X17X87 (canSUB NRtl 7,tt ,

198

/ *\l

"i 1181

148,,r, til,

^

285

N

i l l

442N

-

276/

1100 ' 160 ' 260 ' 260

/ ?3 365

360 ' 350 ' 460 '

376

•100

•90

•60

:70

-60

-60

•40

•30

«0

•10

•0

>A0750 50 NG OFTPP 9x17x87375 SUB NRH

rile: >A0750 Scan *: 375 Retn. timei 7.86

m/z Int. m/z Int. m/z Int. m/z Int. m/z Int.

39.00 6.23 78.00 3.15 128.95 21.26 198.95 6.79 256.00 6.7244.00 .04 79.00 3.76 129.95 1.66 203,95 2.81 258.00 3.0448.90 .57 79.90 2.35 134.95 1.39 204.95 5.15 273.00 1.6850.00 15.17 81.00 4.03 140.90 2.22 205.95 21.07 274.00 3.7751.00 56.14 92.95 5.34 148.00 2.25 206.95 2.68 275.00 23.3152.00 2.55 97.95 4.04 156.00 1.94 216.95 6.81 276.00 2.6655.90 1.79 98.95 3.37 167.00 4.14 220.95 5.88 277.00 1.6157.00 4.05 100.85 1.75 167.90 1.71 222.95 1.57 296.00 6.1557.90 .93 106.95 12.54 178.90 3.11 224.05 11.93 32«flDfnfimtt62.90 2.10 107.95 1.88 180.00 2.13 225,05 3.32 7<SlUDu U '.*L6 70 .96 109.95 30.20 185.00 1.20 226.95 5.18 423.05 3.966fev90 65.64 110.95 4.38 186.00 11.41 244.05 10.21 441.05 11.5774.00 4.95 116.95 9.75 187.10 3.39 245.05 1.43 442.05 76.9475.00 8.19 122.95 1.34 192.00 .96 246.05 2.10 443.05 13.6776.00 2.70 126.95 43.21 195.95 3.36 255.00 49.34 444.05 1.4177.00 44.86 127.95 3.29 197.95 100.00

(t-tt-tt)oons

^« ND._ ________ CCKIWCTGR OCKITUCT NO.^/ ————————

- I D » « T I H E

^RUN NUHBDt j>______ OC RTPCRT NO._________ Jtf*LYST_

TJKE CHECK: |>

Vc5168

69

70

127

197

.98

^

275

365

441

442

443

Ion ttund&nce Criteria30-60% of Bate 198

lect than 2% of *att 69

B&st 69 relative abundanceless than 2% of Bats 6940-601 of •*» 198

less than 1% of nass 198base peaX, 1001 relative abundance5-9% of *asc 19810-301 of Base 198greater than 11 of mass 198less than feats 443greater than 40% of Bass 19817-23% of use 442

% Relative Abundance

&ti0 P )*'•O

•0 (o )1

.7.1-OM6

£.?«2?.?-^9/

//,<^1^^ <l^2

ivaluc in parenthesis is % mass €9*Value in parenthesis is I mass 442Cements t

PR0007I

NO. CONTRACTOR____________CONTRACT NO.

TNSTRUHENT*UN NUKBER

ID «&eO DATE 1/H/V7

I OC REPORT NO.

TIKE rÂNALYST <3)ii/«f

TUNE CHECK t

50

75

95

96

173

174

ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA

15 - 40% of the base peak

30 * 60% of the base peak

Base peak, 100% relative abundance


Less than 1% of the base peak

Greater than 50% of the base peak

% RELATIVE ABUNDANCE

<W

/CO

61<

o.//

r/r-175 5 - 9% of Bass 174 (Pf)*

176

177

lvalue in'value in

Comments:

Greater than 95%, but less than101% of 174

5 * 9% of Bass 176

parenthesis is % of Bass 174.parenthesis is % of Bass 176.

V

7J.f

u"»8

BR100Q72

'• Ir ___.___.____.___,___iw————'——'——'——

g

• COU!

K) W

NJ

—I ** •• COO "*J•d! .;v i ^ *~^

•aI6?CH 4-

CDXCO

K>

Pp

-K S•M K

• CB_ •>!

CO

K>

70

ARI00073S... - -M«*

'OC tO '0 61 'O S OO '20T'C£T C2'0 2T 'T S 00 'TOT

9 TO '0 tO "0 00 *TS2 *9 TO '0 tO '0 00 *OOT22 tO'O tT *0 00792 '80S £0 *T fiS 'fi S OO "96CC £0*0 9C*0 00 'CCS '26CCT fit '02 00 'OOT S 00 'C6TC tO'O 02*0 00*602 't2GT 9£"T 09*6 S 00 *t62 IT CT *0 C£'0 00*802 'C8C 1C '0 OC '2 S 00 'C6662 0* '0 t6 *T 8 00 YO2 'T2t 9C '0 *L "2 00 '262t 9O '0 42 '0 00 *C6T *28 TT '0 CC *0 S 00 '689 TO '0 tO "0 00 '26T 'BSZ. CO 'T 2T 'C S 00 *88GC *0 "0 T2 '0 00 'T6T *9C9 £8 '0 92 *t 5 OO *LB28fi LL *0 BL 'C OO 'LL\ '±L OT '0 Tfi '0 S 00 '28002TT 88 'tT U.'*L OO '9ZT '20fi *9 '0 92 'C S OO 'T886fi 6£*0 68 'C 00*C*T 'tT 20 '0 60*0 S 00*08OSC IT TC "fiT tS "t/. 00 'frill 'Ofit 09 '0 26 '2 S 00 *6£LI 20 '0 TT '0 OO 'CZT '2G tO *0 T2 'O S 00 *6£9 TO '0 tO '0 00 *0£T 'C8 T T '0 tfi '0 S OO *TT TO '0 £0 *0 00 *69T ' GE Cfr '0 6T '2 S 00 *fi TO 0 GO '0 00 *G9t '8028 T6 OT GG *Gfi S OO '6 TO '0 90 *0 OO *6CT '80C2 0 C 66 >T S OO *2T 20 *0 80 *0 OO 'Lt\ *9fi£ 00 *T T6 > S 00 *C£C TO'O GO'0 OO'CfiT *9fi 0 '0 9C *0 S 00*29 TO'O frO'O 00'2fiT *TC £0 '0 GG '0 S 00 'OLTT TO 'O £0 *O 00 'TfiT '89ST 80 '2 6T *OT S 00 '69fit 90 '0 62*0 OO'OfiT 'O GT 28 'T 06*8 S iOO '898T 20 '0 2T '0 00 "BtT "T£T G2 *0 TT 'T S iOO '£9fit 90*0 62*0 OO'CfrT *OG frO '0 6T '0 S cOO "C9862 Otr *0 fr6 'T 00 'TtT 'Gt9 C8 '0 8T > S £00 'G9TT TO '0 *O '0 00 'IGT '22£ 96 '0 69 > iOO '292T 20 '0 80 '0 00'9GT *9t9 9B *0 02 '* S £00 'T9OOT GT 0 fi9 0 00 *CGT 'fiT 20 '0 OT '0 S £00 '099 TO '0 tO '0 00 '2CT 'tB TT *0 Cfi '0 S £OO '8C2G tO '0 T2 '0 t 00 'OGT '009 08 *0 06 'G B £OO '£C62 tO 0 6T '0 00 'Lt\ 'OTG Tt '0 TO *2 S £OO *9fi9 TO '0 tO '0 00 *92T *t2 GO '0 9T *0 S £00 'fifi9 TO'O tO '0 00 'C2T 'Gfi £.0 '0 tC '0 S £00 'GfiT2 GO '0 tT *0 00 't2T 't TO '0 GO '0 S £OO '2fiOG tO '0 6T '0 00 '22T '290T Tt 'T 06 '9 S £OO 'Tfi9C Z.O -0 9G 0 00 '02 T '260t tt fi 6fi '92 S cOO 'OS6G fiO '0 C2 '0 S 00 '6TT 02 96 '0 89 t £00 *6t91 20 0 OT '0 5 00 'BTT 'Ot fiO '0 92 '0 £00 'Bt2 OO '0 TO '0 S 00 '£TT 'LLt LZ'Q 08 'T S cOO *£t9 60 '0 2t '0 00'9TT *6C£ TO "T G6 *t S £00 'fit61 GO '0 2T '0 00 'til '092 CG '0 69 'T S £00 *Ct2 OT '0 L* '0 OO *2TT '96 GT '0 29 '0 S £OO '2t6 TO *0 9O '0 S 00 'TTT *B8 2T '0 L£ '0 S cOO *TtGT 20 '0 80 O 8 00 *60 \ *tBG TC 0 6t '2 S £00 '6C^G CO 0 t2 0 00 SOT frtCT T9 'T 68 'L S £OO *8GTC tO '0 O2 0 S 00 *90T '2T2T T9 'T LB 'L S £OO '.EG02 O. *0 2C T 8 00 'COT 6L\ t2 '0 9T T S £00 9C

X VM X «*»W -uaûi om % VM X0 • T82*o oo-o00 'TX GCTt - pewuirts cfiTf o% tGTt

t29 Vd3 0'8 • <0*02)022-<0'G>fitBJ8 <ON C 'tt> Tf»0*T

*t92C£ :3IU 1 t Z682SDJ :TT»3 9t :t * 00 '8fi -i. 4B/TT/6QC6 :i/« ««*a GtT t

is

C]UdM•

• •- -*•—

/\*i

RECORD

: O• £: w* p

: u.. O•

<X

i °

. |sffllso isS'fi

u.

P g 1

ifliMiQ < *

P!

•!UI

r4

1 i?)

3!fi NI f

S S^

^

£ N

H"7*-

*>?

d t- M- O^ 3

I*'

If-i\^ ^|V1

Ik

0 •

« *c *!•»

OT

-

JS

M* «Elis5s

iw

li

.

^*\^^^\ \ i^^ \ \ N \ ^ \ \ \ *i\

' 1 I •;•; v m

* «t

U**J *™4 *sl

i1;f . . • "/" . . • - • . • , - •

•*

\'*.

v'.

Is4 • '

,5 .* •j55^!So4SS3Sj1§5S'->J^

om«*t«s»s*B«itt«t«.

wIp

HI

S

£oww

S

£9 a

i!1

a|HI 3

isl-

Msi

I* <

!( !i

Q$

k•3s.

-4i

4

J1

>1

K

t

-

Im

,AS

?2cioc^

IStifrs*A

nt

:l^•o»*•

-V3in- !,>

^

M

eP

%i|

rS

1

^

n

<j*

P

'>•

I

!°<

*

»

•

V7*•

o

\1

-

iT;

ID

O.H. Materials Corp*

(

f«

P-SLB°5£1LM«

CHAIN-OF-XdSTODY RECORD

VFindlty, Ohio 45839-0551

M° 9 *\ 9 -1 4

Phone (419)423-3526

v"

<5**«-At

§

TCOIU1 M

KUCCT LOCATION

NAME OP CLIENT

PROJECT TELEPHONE NO

WOJfCTNUMBCT

yqe* AWV/OAK&U- KA*

US, a*/R&ic*i -jm

(&/) iv-zziz.

StttT-E*

5 *« *

1is

if11

c

M

!|

> M \ \ - - -

"\ \t *V 1.

v v- \• V i

i * "5 ^

I..ft <£ ff- P- — * . n33J56 «?

s?***

I

Mi

oft.

Mfip• 1

t|ii

*4-JijI

JVi

-

i 5** y

flS*

1^ 1!i

h

jol

^

|

>'"1

'

V

CM

i

-. 'in to i

Purpose of anafyfie

use twck

of fr

ont sheet if necessary)

- '""J

/iMAtysii Rv^ DKfrtL ? eyrbjr OF

CJTWOMftTOtJ.

PROJECT LOCATION

NAME OF CLIENT


PROJECT NUMBER *

y<>4*

4uTo

us***

57tjf

8.5-

Z M

i!

1

|if

\ \^ \

•»•* i?

*" ^

sf *>* #?

r- ^*a ~*. u.

^ & £r-" W o %ft. 0. ^ *»

5- a J"* O P- «o>9 >4

u-M- Q

O 0

?" *"0 0

< V-1 tf

M *"**« H_. )(O •»

L **

0 x)

— rt

K

S5

ACCEPTED BV

aM a

cUl S

TRANSFER

NUMBER

^«*«

x}

It

-

1 *i

1no

i1i

^

a»

~

•

n * n •o

Purpose of an

atytis uMjwch

of fr

ont s

heet

rf necessary) 1/*/W

»«Nj

O.H. Materials Corp."W?.r'r-

ANALYTICAL REPORT

OHM

419-423-3526Telex 298248 OHMI

CLIENT: TJSEPA Region IIIOak Hill, WV

ATTN:

OHM PROJECT NUMBER: 5162E SAMPLE TYPE: Liquid Composite


Incineration Disposal (Sample LC01)


This report is "PROPRIETARY'. AND CONFIDENTIAL" and delivered to, and intendedfor the exclusive use of* the above named client only. O.B. Materials Corp.assumes no responsibility or liability for the reliance hereon or use hereofby anyone other than the above named client.

All of the analyses and data interpretation that form the basis of this reportwas prepared under the direct supervision and control of the undersigned vhois solely responsible for the contents and conclusions therein.

Reviewed andApproved by:

Thomgfs E. Gran, ?qfv.t Manager Analytical Services Date

ARI00078


PROJECT 5162E


I. INTRODUCTION

O.K. Materials Corp. (OHM) Corporate Laboratory received onesample from USEPA Region III, Oak Hill, West Virginia. Thissample was acquired by OHM's technical personnel and trans-ferred to the laboratory complete with a chain-of-custodyrecord, a copy of which is attached for reference. Thiscomposite was analyzed for Incineration disposal parameters.

It. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

o Metals - Samples were prepared according to USEPA TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/ChemicalMethods, SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1962.Samples wereprepared by either Method 3010, 3030, 3050, or 1310 asappropriate for the following metals; antimony, arsenic,barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead,manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium,and zinc. Sample analyses for these metals wereperformed according to method 6010, Inductively CoupledPlasma Method (SW-846 Proposed Sampling and AnalyticalMethodologies, 1984).

° Density - Densities were determined by either ASTM MethodD1298-60 for liquids or by Method 213E for solids,Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-water 16th edition, 1985.

o BTU Content-Solids and Liquids - The BTU content of thesamples was determined by either ASTM E711-81, TestMethod for Gross Calorific Value of Refuse Derived Fuel(RDF-3) by Bomb Calorimeter, Section II, Vol. 11.04 or byASTM D240-76, Test Method for Heat of Combustion ofLiquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, Section 5,Vol. 05.01.

0 Ash Content - The ash content of the samples wasdetermined by either ASTM E830-81, Test Method for Ash inthe Analysis Samples of Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF-3),Section II, Vol. 11.04, or by ASTM D482-80 Test Methodfor Ash from Petroleum Products, Section 5, Vol. 05.01.

o Sulfur Content - The sulfur content of the samples wasdetermined by either ASTM E775-81, Test Methods for TotalSulfur in the Analysis Sample of Refuse-Derived Fuel,Section II, Vol. 11.04, or by ASTM D129-64 (1978), TestMethod for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General BombMethod), Section 5, Vol. 05.01.

fiRI00079

PROJECT 5162E


Pesticides and PCS Content - Samples were prepared byMethod 3^10, 3540, or 3550 as appropriate; and analyzedaccording to Method 8080 of USEPA Test Methods forEvaluating Solid Wastes, Phsical/Chemical Methods,y

19SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1982.

o Chlorine Content - The samples were analyzed for percentchlorine according to American Society for Testing andMaterials, Section 5, Method D808-81, Chlorine in New andUsed Petroleum Products (Bomb Method).

° Viscosity - Organic liquids were analyzed using aBrookfield viscometer according to ASTM D2983, Volume5.03, 1983.

o Water and Sediment Content - Organic liquids wereanalyzed for percent levels of water and sedimentaccording to ASTM D4007, Volume 5.03, 1983, CentrifugeMethod.

° Total Solids - Solid samples were analyzed for TotalSolids (TS) according to Standard Methods, 16th edition,Method 290F, Residue, Total, Gravimetric, Dried at103°C-105°C.

o GC/MS Volatile Organic Analyses and Screens - Volatileanalysis of the samples are performed using methods basedon USEPAs Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes,Physical/CFemical Methods, SW-846, July 1982; Method8zJo, GC/MS Methods for Volatile Organics.

o GC/MS Semi-Volatile Organic Analyses and Screens - Acidand base neutral extractables are prepared and analyzedusing methods based on USEPAs Test Methods forEvaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods,SW-846, July 1982; Method 6240, GC/MS Methods for S«mi-Volatile Organics.

o Flash Point - Flash points were performed according tothe procedure specified in USEPA Test Methods for Evalu-ating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846,2nd edition, July 1982; Method 1010, PensJty-MartinClosed-cup Method.

III. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The following tables detail the analytical results for sampleI5162E-LC01.

ARI00080

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 1 - INCINERATION DISPOSAL ANALYSIS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Liquid CompositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-LC01

Parameter Resultmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmi

Color Red/OrangeOdor Mild, Solvent

Number of Phases ' 2Percent by volume of phases 10/90

Physical state of phases LiquidDensity 1.01 gm/cm3

Flash Point, PM, CC < 20°CViscosity, Brookefield 30 cpuBTU Content ' < 200 BTU/lb

Ash Content 0.08% by weight

Chlorine Content < 0.1% by weight

Sulfur Content < 0.1% by weight

Total Solids 1.66% by weight

Total Suspended Solids 0.44% by weightTotal Dissolved Solids 1.22% by weight

ARI0008I

PROJECT 5162E



Compound Concentration (mg/L)

Benzene BDLBromomethane BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether , BDLChloroform BDLChloromethane BDLDibromochloromethane BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,1-Dichloroethane ' BDL1,2-Dichloroethane BDL1,1-Dichloroethene . BDLTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL1,2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-l,2-Dichloropropene BDLTrans-1,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 170Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluoromethane BDLToluene 1,240Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 710

Limit of Detection - 100 mg/L ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

Aftf00082

PROJECT 5162E


SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Liquid CompositeETC SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-LC01


Acetone ,1,860 100

Acrolein BDL 100

Acrylonitrile BDL 1002-Butanone BDL 100

Carbon Disulfide BDL 100

Ethyl ether BDL 100Ethylene Dibromide BDL . 100

2-Hexanone BDL 100i4-Mcthyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 100

, Styrene BDL 100

Tetrahydrofuran BDL 100

1,1,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane BDL 100

Vinyl Acetate BDL 100

mg/L - ppm (parts-per-million)BDL -Below Detection Limit

ARIOOQ83

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 4 - VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS

V, SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Liquid CompositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-LC01

Compound Concentration (mg/L)mmmmmmmmmmmammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmt

No chromatographic peaks present with an area greater than 25% ofthe internal standards

ftR l-0008'l*

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 5 - BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS



Acenaphthene BDLAcenaphthylene BDLAnthracene BDLBenzo(a)anthracene BDLBenzo(b)fluoranthenc BDLBenzo(k)fluoranthene BDLBenzo(a)pyrene BDLBenzo(g,h,i)perylene BDLBis(2-chloroethyl)ether BDLBis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BDLBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BDLBis (2-chloroisopropyl} ether1 BDL4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BDLButyl benzyl phthalate BDL2-Chloronaphthalene BDL4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BDLChrysene BDLDibenzo(a,h)anthracene BDLDi-n-butylphthalate , BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDLDiethylphthalate BDLDimethylphthalate BDL2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL2,6-Dinitrotoluene BDLDioctylphthalate BDL1,2-Diphenyl hydrazine BDLFluoranthene BDLFluorene BDLHexachlorobenzene BDLRexachlorobutadiene BDLHcxachloroethane BDLHexachlorocyclopentadiene BDLIndeno-(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BDLIsophorone BDLNaphthalene 276Nitrobenzene BDLN-Nitrosodi-n-propylaminc BDLN-Nitrosodiphenylamine BDLPhenanthrene BDLPyrene BDL1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BDL

Limit of Detection - 100 mg/L ppm (parts-per-million)BDL • Below Detection Limit AR i 00085

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 6 - ACID EXTRACTABLE



4-Chloro-3-Nethylphenol BDL2-Chlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dichlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dimethylphenol BDL2,4-Dinitrophenol BDL

2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol BDL

2-Nitrophenol BDL

4-Nitrophenol BDL

Pentachlorophenol • BDLPhenol BDL


Limit of Detection - 100 mg/L ppm (parts-per-million)BDL -Below Detection Limit

ARI00086

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 7 - ADDITIONAL SEMI-VOLATILE HSL COMPOUNDS

v .. SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Liquid CompositeOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-LC01


Aniline DDL

Benzyl Alcohol ' BDL

4-Chloroaniline BDL

Dibenzofuran BDL

2-Methylnaphthalene BDL

2-Methylphenol BDL

4-Methylphenol BDL

2-Nitroaniline BDL

3-Nitroaniline , BDL4-Nitroaniline BDL


Limit of Detection - 100 mg/L ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

flRIOOOS?

PROJECT S162E

TABLE 8 - SEMI-VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS


Compound • Concentration (mg/L)

Petroleum Hydrocarbons analyzed by GC;

Gasoline Fraction 7,550

Limit. of Detection - 100 mg/L ppm (parts-per-million)

AR 1 00088

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 9 - PESTICIDES AND PCBS



Aldrin BDL 100BHC-alpha *• BDL 100BHC-beta BDL 100BHC-gamma BDL 100BHC-delta BDL 100Chlordane BDL 5004,4'-DDD BDL 1004,4'-DDE BDL 1004,4'-DOT BDL 100Dieldrin BDL 100Endosulfan-alpha BDL 100Endosulfan-beta BDL 100Endosulfan sulfate BDL 100Endrin BDL 100Endrin aldehyde BDL 100Heptachlor BDL 100Heptachlor epoxide BDt 100Toxaphene BDL 100

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS

Aroclor 1016 BDL 500Aroclor 1221 BDL 500Aroclor 1232 BDL 500Aroclor 1242 BDL 500Aroclor 1248 BDL 500Aroclor 1254 BDL 500Aroclor 1260 BDL 500

mg/L - ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

ARI00089

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 10 -

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:OHM SAMPLE NUMBER:

Compound Name

Antimony

ArsenicBarium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Chromium (Total)Copper

IronLeadManganese

Mercury

NickelSelenium

Silver

Thallium

Zinc

TOTAL KETALS FOR INCINERATION

Liquid Composite5162E-LC01

Concentrationmg/L

BDL

2.15

48,2

BDL

5.55

79.2

BDL

1,152

4i6

11.7

0.40

2.12

BDL

BDL

BDL

77.8

DISPOSAL

DetectionLimit mg/L

1.01.01.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

mg/L - ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

ARI00090

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 11 - TEST BULKING RESULTS


Test Bulking Parameters

Date of Test Bulk: 9-02-87

Samples Bulked: 672, 676, 680, 681, 683, 684, 686,689, 691, 692

Temperature Rise: < 2.0°CGas Evolved: None observed

Precipitate: None observedGelling or Solidification: None observed

AR.10009.1

PROJECT 5162E

QC SUMMARY

A. Conventionals:Cloride Percent Recovery: 113%

B. GC/MS Priority Pollutant volatile Organics:BFB Tune File: See attachedSurrogate Recoveries:

Sample Blank Spike

1,2-Dichloroethane-d. 97.8 111 94.4Benzene-d. 101 111 89.3Toluene-d! 114 123 105BFB 117 127 90.0

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)Benzene 102Bromomethane 97.2Bromodichloromethane 108Bromoform 116Carbon Tetrachloride 114Chlorobenzene 88.0Chloroethane ' 1002-Chloroethylvinyl ether 119Chloroform 121Chloromethane • 95.2Dibromochloromethane 1191,2-Dichlorobenzene 57.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 99.11,4-Dichlorobenzene 57.01,1-Dichloroethane 1301,2-Dichloroethane 1011,1-Dichloroethene 127Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1191,2-Dichloropropane 90.71,3-Dichloropropenes 98.9Ethylbenzene 107Methylene Chloride 1261,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 93.8Tetrachloroethene 1151,1,1-Trichloroethane 1021,1,2-Trichloroethane 98.2Trichloroethene 124Trichlorofluoromethane 121Toluene 102Vinyl Chloride 100Total Xylenes 103

ARI00092

PROJECT 5162E


Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries (in Percentages): Continued

Additional CompoundsMethyl ethyl Ketone 98.1Carbon Disulfide 111Acetone 96.5Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 104Methyl Pentanone 89.0Xylenes 105Styrene

C. GC/MS Priority Pollutant Semi-volatile Organics:DFTPP Tune File: See attachedPercent Surrogate Recoveries:

Sample Blank Spike2-Fluorophenol 60.4 66.8 61.0Phenol-d. 45.9 46.8 55.7Nitrobenzene-d. 73.5 60.2 65.42-Fluorobiphenyl 91.4 61.6 1072,4,6-Tribromophenol 79.5 103 75.2p-Terphenyl-d14 125 , 113 128

Semi-volatile Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)^ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 87.0 94.4

2-Chlorophenol 112 106Phenol 51.2 86,5N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 85.5 91.51,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 96.3 1024-Chloro-3-Methylphenol .76.5 86.0Acenaphthene 109 1052,4-Dinitrotoluene 104 107Dibutylphthalate 93.0 1014-Nitrophenol 46.9 86.9Pyrene 90.5 81.2

D. Pesticides, Herbicides: Percent Spike RecoveriesAldrin 52.0Lindane 62.0Toxaphene 59.02,4-D 88.02,4,5~TP 81.0Heptachlor 85*0a-BHC 79.6b-BHC 86.3

PCBs Recoveries: Aroclor 1254- 68%ARI 00093

PROJECT 5162E


, E. Metals: Percent Spike RecoveriesAntimony 88.2 96.8Arsenic 97.2 91.7Barium 93.2 92.9Beryllium 97.5 100.2Cadmium 98.9 99.6Chromium 97.4 96.2Copper 92.9 93.8Iron v 95.6 96.4Lead 95.4 99.7Manganese 121.0 118.5Mercury 109.9 154.6Nickel 96.2 101.7Selenium 92.5 98.4Silver 101.3Thallium 98.5 103.4Zinc 113.5 109.9

ARI00091*

R

COCK

fe £:comentk<->25 u-

U)

2 COUJ V

ooocy

8

CH

IS

igW8g' - *

R-_•• M^

—— -" * • •

fc~.

(9ir>CM

CM

CDHIT)

R

ARI00095

PUfts List Data: BFB91487 f 119 Bate m/i: 9509/14/87 6:21:00 +3:58 C«li: FC91487 t 3 RIC: 68224.Sample: 44. 5NC BFB ISO 220Condf. : 45(3. 0)-220<20.0> t G. 0 EPA 624• 112 to «127 ftunatd - tVl to §143 - «91 XI. 00

34 0. OO 0.00 0. Mini*a hin Inttn: 7.262 t 0 Max!«*Has* X RA X RIC Inttn. Hats X RA X RIC Inttn.

36.00? S 1.34 0.28 193. 109.00 S 0.46 0.10 66.37. OO? S 9. 21 1.94 1324. 106. 00 S 0. 43 O. O9 62.38. OO? 6 8. 30 1. 75 1192. 110. OO 6 0. 15 0. 03 21.39. 00? 8 3. 68 0. 78 529. 115. 00 S 0. 06 0.01 9.40. OO S 0. 19 O. 04 27. 116. 00 S 0. 30 O. O6 43.44. OO S 0. 66 0. 14 95. 117. OO S 0. 25 0. OS 36.45. 00 S 2. 20 0. 46 316. 116. 00 S 0. 06 0. 01 9.46. 00 S 0. 19 0. 04 28. 120. 00 S O. 05 0. 01 7.47. OO S 1. 71 0. 36 246. 121. 00 S 0. 06 0. 01 9.48.00 S 0.50 0.11 72. 122.00 S 0.09 0.02 13.49. 00 S 5. 26 1. 11 756. 123. 00 S 0. 05 0. 01 7.50. OO S 32. 07 6. 75 4608. 125. OO S 0. 17 0. O4 25.51.00 S 8.87 1.87 1274. 126.00 S 0.09 0.02 13.52.00 S 0.24 0.05 34. 127.00 S 0.15 0.03 22.55. OO S 0. 64 0. 13 92. 130. 00 S 0. 34 0. 07 49.56.00 S 1.80 0.38 258. 134.00 S 0. 15 0.03 21.57. OO 8 3. 83 0. 81 550. 135. OO S 0. 18 0.04 26.60.00 S 0.81 0.17 117. 136.00 S 0.11 0.02 16.61.00 8 4.77 1.00 685. 137.00 S 0.08 0.02 12.62. 00 S 4. 59 0. 97 659. 140. 00 S 0. 05 0.01 7.63. 00 S 3. 64 0. 77 523. 141. 00 S 0. 46 0. 10 66.

. OO S 0.37 0.08 53. 143.00 S 0.33 0.07 48.65. 00 S 0. 06 0. 01 8. 144. 00 S 0. 06 0. 01 9.67. 00 S 0. 17 0. 04 24. 145. 00 6 0. 24 0.05 34.68. OO S 10. 80 2. 27 1552. 153.00 S 0. 17 0.04 24.69. OO S 3. 40 0. 72 488. 154.00 S 0. 15 0.03 21.70.00 S 0.54 0.11 78. 155. OO S 0.26 0.06 38.71.00 S 0.38 0.08 55. 157.00 S 0.07 0.01 1O.72. OO S 0. 37 0. OS 53. 158. 00 S O. O7 0. Ol 1O.73.00 8 5.19 1.09 746. 160.00 S 0.07 0.01 10.74.00 5 16.73 3.52 2404. 161.00 S 0. 10 0.02 14.75. 00 S 56. 40 11.88 B104. 162. 00 S 0. 17 0.04 24.76. 00 8 3. 66 0.61 554. 163.00 6 0. 10 0.02 15.77. 00 S O. 72 0. 15 104. 171. OO S 0. 10 0.02 14.78.00 8 0. 29 0.06 41. 173. OO 8 0.22 0.05 32.79.00 8 3. 17 0.67 456. 174.00 S 65.26 13.74 9376.80.00 S 1.11 0.23 159. 175.00 6 3.77 0.79 542.61. OO S 3.36 0.71 483. 176.00 6 65.26 13.74 9376.62. OO 6 0. 71 0. 15 102. 177.00 6 3.27 0.69 470.87.00 S 3.22 0.68 463. 168. OO 6 0.06 0.01 6.68.00 S 3.77 0.79 542. 191.00 6 0. 16 0.03 23.89.00 6 0.19 0.04 28. 192.00 6 0.08 0.02 11.91.00 8 0.27 0.06 39. 193.00 S 0.05 0.01 7.92.00 S 1.90 0.40 273. 207.00 S 2.07 0. 44 29B.Q c93.00 6 2.96 0.62 426. 208.00 S 0.45 0. O$R | U l*M." 094.00 S 9. 52 2.01 1368. 209.00 E 0.25 0.05 ~ 36.

O95.0O S 100. OO 21.06 14368. 214.00 6 0.05 0.01 7.96.00 6 5.73 1.21 623. 223.00 6 0.22 0.05 32.97.00 S 0. 13 0.03 18. 224.00 6 0.06 0.01 6.104. OO S 0.33 O. O7 46.

NO._____________CONTRACTOR____________CONTRACT »0.

INSTRUMENT

ÛN NUMBER

TUNE CHECK;

SO

75

95

96

173

174

O75176

177

ID n S* DATE yfiy/f} TIME J$& $fj&

1 OC REPORT NO. ANALYST <&"

ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA % RELATIVE ABUNDANCE

15 - 40% of the base peak - .

30 - 60% of the base peak /•/ u

Base peak, 100% relative abundance JQQ

5 - 9% of the base peak ^-a*

Less than 1% of the base peak ^ .Z-

Greater than 50% of the base peak CX~3

5 - 9% of BBSS 174 <7 •-„ <5#?37» 73Greater than 95%, but less than * .101% of 174 t£3 CM>3

5 - 9% of mass 176 7.^ ^ft*

lvalue in parenthesis is %'value in parenthesis is %

of »ass 174.of aass 176.

Comments i

IU >A0764

O:90-

BO-

70-

60-

BO-

40-

30-

20-

u.

69

1,BO

60 N6 DFTPPSUB

198

77/ 127\

"I 118

V41 nl100 ' 150 '2

^

9NRH

'18X8? 8c%n 3787, 89 i. 0

442

V

296

!!DO

\

11

276/

50

296t 365...L,,,.,....!,.,,,,,,.,;,.300 350 409

•100

•90

«0

•70

•40

-CO

•40

•30

-20

•10

•0

>A0764 50 NG DFTPP 9/16/87378 SUB NRM

File: >A0764 Scan *: 378 Retn. time: 7.89

m/z Int. m/z Int. m/z Int. m/z Int. m/z Int.

38.90 6.25 78.00 3.04 126.95 41.11 197.95 100.00 255.00 45.8348.90 .41 79.00 3.18 127.95 3.40 198.95 6.90 256.00 6.6150.00 14.62 60.00 2.41 126.95 16.85 203.95 2.63 257.90 2.7251.00 57.46 61.00 4.34 129.95 1.57 204.95 4.16 274.00 3.6052.00 3.20 92.95 4.56 140.90 2.49 205.95 20.96 275.00 22.6055.90 1.67 97.95 3.19 167.00 3.51 207.05 2.71 276.00 3.0656.90 4.11 98.95 3.22 167.9d 2.35 216.95 5.77 296.00 5.4163.00 2.11 100.95 1.65 179.00 3.10 221.05 5.61 365.00 2.1866.90 65.44 106.95 13.07 160.00 1.67 224.05 11.66 423.05 3.7274.00 4.75 109.95 28.66 186.00 11.18 224.95 3.05 441.15 9.7975.00 8.35 110.95 4.13 187.00 3.31 226.95 4.34 442.05 68.5976.00 2.47 116.95 9.07 195.95 2.90 244.05 10.31

iCASE K>.____________ CCNZWtfTQR CCKXRACT »

XD TIKE

RUN MUKBgR OC REPORT M O . A N A L Y S T

TIKE CHECK: EM

c5168

6970

127

197

.98

99i-275

365

441

442

443

Ion Abundance Criteria30-60% of Bass 198

lees than 2% of fiats 69

B&SS €9 relative abundanceless than 2% of Base €940-601 of B*ts 198

less than 1% of Base 198base peak, 1001 relative abundance5-9% of Bass 198

10-90% of Bass 198

greater than 1% of Bats 198lets than Bats 443greater than 40% of Bass 198

17-23% of B&ss 442

% Relative Abundance

n.rO (O)1ts~ <•/* (o)1

v//o/OO

c.™-2-1. i1>>3

f.M6*U

<tf/>2ivalue in parenthesis is I Bass 69

e in parenthesis is I Bass 442Concents:

flRI00099

Z

o

-S<?

•S s»sqOSz0-*!t o i

tj4f)

?

4H-

*

v:

If

gOoiu£C

Q

CO RO

A

M

j

j

Mf •

î^

^

f7

V'S»

V.. —.

T**Pu

•CwCJ

>

fc-^

TODY RECORD

CO

O

Xo

»•

O.H.

Mtttriali Corp

P.O. Box 551

Findtay. Ohio 45839-0

Phone (419) 423-352

5!^^ I

X'!pi

\ in• ^ ** isl| >B« vn

CT TELEPHONE NO

«>zm.

7

i *3 (Q

1

5•a:

H'IJL

1'6.i»* rt8*3 **

-

I

t

||

1M

i!

V 1 I i V — — — .* J \ \ J

3 ;C

v. ^

V\ < °

i ' "ei

5 -x

I\\

, /V ^

i\

I. '1 ™ • —

^

- , - • • ' . - . ; . . • - • • ' • A

3

SS

ACCEPTED r

TRANSFERS

RELMOUISHEO BY

ISui V

S w

1 =U

j«

I

W

l£1*j

•jl

^j

^V

-?Itb

i*

B

J

ii§X1i;H

I^54

T^

CM

1

M

J(

!.iji(

%

n

li

jjS

*3-£-ri

•ii«iiSc

•

-

r

ID

OCMCM

CO1

• 1

oGCOo111ffiOop-coAu.OZ

Xu

-i!Ssofef

PROJECT LOCATION

NAME OF CLIENT


PROJECT NUMBER

You

AUTO

USE?*

s'le

u *I* "

I <t

3 *

DESCRIPTION

|§

M

i|

•

\ \^ \

aT *^

A «fc

sf "1 1

• **

^ ol2 r "I^ *C* 3 K.0» 0. ^ >*

^ "° K tr

*"o *o v_J3 -4J

S 5<" l"

V*< ^—1 tf

14 *""7« rJ

*" S)' i

"o 1 AR|

i

•I

I

ACCEPTED

BV

TRANSFERS

RELINQUISHED *V

it

Si

i'

S>%^:

55V

"t

1^1•s

-

ifI A

:Q:|

^

j

^

"

^

n * •n w

I!im

iiiIz

&

ANALYTJCALREPORT . - ^ -^ .AT j j. j a - .21 , s y_3t.2o

Tcl«298218OHMI LR.RC\i

OHM

CLIENT: USEPA Region IIIOak Hill, W

ATTN:

OHM PROJECT NUMBER: 5162E SAMPLE TYPE: Solids'


GC/MS Volatile Organics plusScreens


This report is "PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL" and delivered tot and intendedfor the exclusive use of, the above named client only. O.H. Materials Corp.assumes no responsibility or liability for the reliance hereon or use hereofby anyone other than the above named client.

All of the analyses and data interpretation that form the basis of this reportwas prepared under the direct supervision and control of the undersigned whois solely responsible for the contents and conclusions therein.

Reviewed endApproved by: _____________________ _______^

Thomas E. Gran* Ph.D.* Manager Analytical Services 4ate

ARIOOI03A Subsidiary of Environmental Treatnwm and Ttchnologfos Corp.

PROJECT 5162E


I. INTRODUCTION

O.H. Materials Corp. (OHM) Corporate Laboratory received onesample from USEPA Region III, Oak Hill, West Virginia. Thissample was acquired by OEM's technical personnel and trans-ferred to the laboratory complete with a chaln-of-custodyrecord, a copy of which is attached for reference. Thesesamples were analyzed for GC/MS volatile organics andscreens. ' '

II. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

o GC/MS volatile Organic Analyses and Screens - Volatileanalysis of the samples are performed using methods basedon USEPAs Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes,Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-646, July 1962? Method8240, GC/MS Methods for Volatile Organics.

III. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The following tables detail the analytical results forsamples I5162E-667 through I5261E-671.

ARIQQIQ1*

PROJECT 5162E


SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SoilOHM SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-667


Benzene , BDLBromomethane • '* BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform . • BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLChloromethane BDLDibromochloromethane BDL1,2-DiChlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene • BDL1,1-Dichloroethane BDL1,2-Dichloroethane t BDL1,1-Dichloroethene BDLTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL1,2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-1,2-Dichloropropene BDLTrans-1,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 6.03Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane / BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trlchloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluoromethane BDLToluene 18.9Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal xylenes 383

Limit of Detection - 0.400 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL • Below Detection Limit

fiFUOOIOS

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 1 * VOLATILE ORGANICS (CONTINUED)



Benzene BDLBromome thane . '- BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform • BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL .2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLChloromethane BDLDibromochloromethane BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobcnzenc BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene . BDL1,1-Dichloroethane BDL1,2-Dichloroethane BDL1,1-Dichloroethene ' BDLTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL1,2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-1,2-Dichloropropene BDLTrans-1,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 13.7Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluoromethane BDLToluene 10*7Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 532

Limit of Detection • 0.400 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

AR100106

PROJECT S162E

TABLE 1 * VOLATILE ORGANICS (CONTINUED)



Benzene BDL •Bromomethane ' ' BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform • BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLChloromethane BDLDibromochloromethane BDL1,2-DiChlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene * BDL1,1-Dichloroethane BDL1,2-Dichloroethane , BDL1,1-Dichloroethene BDLTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL v1,2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-1,2-Dichloroptopene BDLTrans-1,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 32,8Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene t BDLTrichlorofluoromethane * BDLToluene 24.8Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 166

Limit of Detection - 0.400 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

ARIOOI07

PROJECT S162E

TABLE 1 - VOLATILE ORGANICS (CONTINUED)



Benzene t . , BDLBromomethane ' ' BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform * BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLChloromethane BDLDibromochlocomethane BDL1,2-DlChlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-DiChlorobenzene . BDL1,1-Dichloroethanc BDL1,2-Dichloroethane * BDL1,1-Dichloroethene BDLTrans-1,2-Dichloroethene BDL

^ * 1,2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-l,2-Dichioropropene BDLTr&ns-l,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 11.7Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluoromethane BDLToluene 12.8Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 207

Limit of Detection * 0.400 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

ARI00108

PROJECT. 5162E

TABLE 1 - VOLATILE ORGANICS (CONTINUED)



Benzene . BDLB romome thane ; BDLBromodichlorome thane BDLBromoform • BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLChlorome thane BDLDibromochlorome thane BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dlchlorobenzene . BDL1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,1-Dichloroethane BDL1 , 2-Dichloroethane ' BDL1 , 1-Dlchloroethene BDLTrans-1, 2-Dichloroethene BDL1 , 2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-l,2-Dichloropropene BDLTrans-1, 3-Dlchloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 67.1Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1, 1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1, 2-Tr ichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluorome thane BDLToluene 76.5Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 700

Limit of Detection - 0.400 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

flRiooiog

PROJECT 5162E


SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SoilETC SAMPLE NUMBER: 5162E-667

Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit ()

Acetone 0.957 1.0

Acrolein BDL 1.0

Acrylonitrile BDL 1.0

2-Butanone 2.61 1.0

Carbon Disulfide BDL 1.0

Ethyl ether BDL 1.0

Ethylene Dibromide BDL • 1.0

2-Hexanone BDJ, 1.0

. 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 1.0^ j * Styrene BDL 1.0

Tetrahydrofuran BDL 1.0

1,1, 2-Trichloro-l ,2,2-tr if luoroe thane BDL 1.0

Vinyl Acetate BDL 1.0

mg/Kg * ppm (parts-per-million)BDL - Below Detection Limit

A R J O O i l O

-O/8

PROJECT 5162E

TABLE 2 - VOLATILE HSL COMPOUNDS (CONTINUED)


Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit ()

Acetone • BDL 1.0

Acroleln . BDL 1.0


2-Butanone 2.59 1.0


Ethyl ether BDL 1.0

Ethylene Dibromide BDL 1*0\

2-Hexanone BDL 1.0. t 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 1,0

«Styrene BDL 1,0

Tetrahydrofuran BDL 1.0

l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trif luoroethane BDL 1.0



A R I O O I I I

9-24-879

PROJECT 5162E



Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit ()mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmi

Acetone ' BDL 1.0

Acrolein BDL 1.0

Acrylonitrile BDL 1 . 02-Butanone 2.39 1.0


Ethyl ether BDL . 1.0

Ethylene Dibromide BDL 1.0i2-Hexanone BDL 1 . 0

4-Methyl-2-Pentanpne (MIBK) BDL 1.0

Styrene BDL 1.0

Te trahydrofuran BDL 1 . 0

1,1, 2-Trichloro-l ,2,2-trifluoroethane BDL 1.0



AR 1001 12

9-24-8710

PROJECT 5162E


SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: SoilETC SAMPLE' NUMBER: 5162E-670

Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit ()mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm^^^mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmt

Acetone ' BDL 1.0

Acrolein BDL 1.0

Acrylonitrile BDL 1.02-Butanone 2.05 1.0


Ethyl ether BDL 1.0Ethylene Dibromide BDL 1.0

i2-Hexanone 0.949 1.04-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 1.0

Styrene BDL 1.0Tetrahydrofuran BDL 1.0

1,1, 2-Trichloro-l ,2,2-trif luocoethane BDL 1.0



ARIOOI 13

11PROJECT. 5162E



Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit ()••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••i

Acetone 1.07 1.0

Acrolein BDL 1.0


2-Butanone 2.62 1.0


Ethyl ether BDL 1.0Ethylene Dibromide BDL 1.0

2-Hexanone BDL 1.0

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 1.0

Styrene BDL 1.0

Tetrahydrofuran BDL 1.0l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-

t r i fluo roe thane BDL 1.0vinyl Acetate BDL 1.0


AR 1 00 I I if

12

PROJECT 5162E

QC SUMMARY

A. GC/MS Priority Pollutant Volatile Organics:

BFB Tune File: See attachedSurrogate Recoveries:

1667 1668 1669 t670 1671 Blank Spike

1,2-Dichloroethane-d. 97.8 91.1 83,6 86*9 106 111 94.7Benzene-d, 95.9 95.5 92.1 96.4 100 111 98.0Toluene-d* 114 110 106 112 113 123 107BFB 127 118 111 118 118 127 115

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)Benzene 118Bromomethane 106Bromodichloromethane 110 .Bromoform 121Carbon Tetrachloride 122Chlorobenzene 118Chloroethane 1102-Chloroethylvinyl ether t 120Chloroform ' 115Chloromethane 112Dibromochloromethane 1241,2-Dichlorobenzene 1291,3-DiChlorobenzene 1171,4-Dichlorobenzene 1291,1-Dichloroethane 1291,2-Dichloroethane 97.81,1-Dichloroethene 125Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1141,2-Dichloropropane 1251,3-Dichloropropenes 107Ethylbenzene 113 \Methylene Chloride 1181,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 94.4Tetrachloroethene 1311,1,1-Trichloroethane 1061,1,2-Trichloroethane 114Trichloroethene 126Trichlorofluoromethane 117Toluene 112Vinyl Chloride 113Total Xylenes 109

PROJECT 5162E


Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries (in Percentages): Continued

Additional CompoundsMethyl ethyl Ketone 102Carbon Disulfide 109Acetone 84.2Methyl isobutyl Ketone 111Methyl Fentanone 101Styrene • 116

A R I O O I I 6

WO.__ ___ ____ _CONT*ACTOH_____________CONT&ACT MO.

INSTRUMENT

HUN KUKBER

TUKt CHECK

SO

75

95

96

173

174vv_y «

175

176

177

Rvalue in'Value in

Comments:

ID fafJfJ DATE '^llVlV^

1 cc fttrotr NO.

SON ABUNDANCE CRITERIA


30 - 60% of the base p«ak





5 - 9% of mass 174

Greater than 95%, but less than101% of 174

5 - 9% of aass 176

parenthesis is % of mats 174.parenthesis is % of mass 176.

V

TIRE -*f* OffTjT

JUCALYST G&*

\ RELATIVE ABUNDANCE

iif' . fr.L

(JO

6.11-

D-l fa

vft 1**

K2, *

' ^ 6

tfi* «

A'RIOOll?

CON-LOCO~ 51 N. fen ++ ®- ~es wCQU.

OO

IF)

ie s-

r———•———'———'——'———-———'——tfHIUU'l IBC ^ _

£ *

ruts List Data: BF891687 * 12O Bate a/i: 95O9/16/E7 7:49:00 * 4:00 Call: FC91487 « 3 RIC: 125OS6.Staple: «4. 5NC BFB ISO 220Condt. : *3<3. 0>-220<20. 0) €8.0 EPA 624*112 ta «129 suwBtd - tS9 to §134 - #39 XI. OO

3c O. OO 0.00 0. Hini»a Kin Inttn: 0.2E: * 0 M*zi»aHas* X RA X RIC Intcn. Hats X RA X RIC Int«n.

36. OC~ S 1. 31 0. 26 328. 107. 00 S 0. 03 0. 01 7.37. OC* £ 9. 98 2. OO 2500. 1 10. OO S 0. 02 0. OO 6;38. OC- 5 9.04 1.81 2264. 113.00 S 0. 08 0.02 21.39. OC- £ 3. 44 0.69 863. 115. OO S O. 07 0.01 18.45. OC £ 3. 03 0.61 760. 116. OO S 0.20 0. O4 SO.46. OC £ 0. 06 0. 01 16. 117. 00 S 0. 29 0. 06 73.47. OC H 1 . 50 0. 30 376. 1 18. OO S 0. 27 0. 05 68.48. OC r C 51 0.10 129. 119.00 S 0.30 0.06 76.49. CC £ 561 1. 12 14O6. 122. 00 S 0. 01 0. 00 2.50. (X =22 76 6. 56 82O8. 126. 00 S 0. 17 0. 03 42.51. OC = 9.31 1.86 2332. 129.00 S 0.06 0.01 15.52. OC £ 0 26 0. 05 65. 130. 00 S 0. 16 0. 03 4O.55. OC £ C. 14 0. 03 36. 131. 00 S 0. 05 0. 01 12.56. OC £ 1. 83 0. 37 456. 132. 00 S 0. 04 0. 01 9.57. OC S 4. 11 0. 82 1030. 133. 00 S 0. 18 . 0. 04 45.58. OC S 0. 08 0. 02 19. 134. 00 S 0. OS 0. 01 13.60. OO S O. 67 0.13 167. 135. OO S 0.01 0.00 2.61. OO S 4. 96 0. 99 1244. 141. Ob S 0. 51 0. 10 128.62. 00 S 4. 92 0. 99 1234. 143. 00 S 0. 57 0. 11 142.63.00 S 3.78 0.76 947. 147.00 S 0.06 0.01 14.64. 00 S 0. 27 0. 05 67. 148. 00 S 0. 06 0. 01 14.65. OO S 0.01 0.00 3. 150.00 S 0.03 O. 01 6.68. OC £ 1 1 65 2. 33 2920. 154. 00 S 0. 02 0. OO 4.69. OC r IZ. 44 2.49 3116. 155.00 S 0.06 0.01 15.70. OC £ 0.54 0.11 136. 157. OO S 0. O8 0. 02 21.72. OC £ 0 53 0.11 132. 159.00 S O. O6 0.01 15.73.OO £ 4.68 0.94 1172. • 161.00 S 0. Ol 0.00 2.74. OO £ IS O4 3. 61 4520. 163. 00 8 0. 03 0. 01 7.75.OO S 56 56 11.73 14672. 166.00 S 0. Ol 0. OO 3.76. OO S 4. 07 0. 81 1019. 173. OO 6 0. 16 0. 03 39.77. OO S 0. 60 0. 12 150. 174. 00 S 68. 20 13. 66 17O8S.78. OO S 0. 22 0. 04 56. 175. 00 S 3. 52 0. 71 682.79. OO S 3. 47 0. 70 870. 176. 00 S 67. 18 13. 46 16832.80. OO S 0.66 0.13 166. 177.00 S 3.52 0.70 881.81. OO S 3.50 0.70 878. 178.00 S 0.04 0.01 9.62. OO £ O. 57 0. 11 142. 191. OO S 0. 20 0. 04 SO.86. OC £ 0. 08 0. 02 20. 192. 00 S 0. 03 0. 01 6.87. OC £ 4. 61 0. 92 1154. 193. 00 S 0. 04 0. 01 9.88. OC £ 4. 29 0. 86 1074. 205. 00 S 0. 01 0. OO 2.B9. OC £ 0. 23 0. 05 57. 207. 00 8 3. 78 C 7692. OC = 1 . 79 0. 36 449. 206. OO 8 0. 57 O. 1 193. OC £ 3.14 0.63 786 209. OO . S 0,47 0. 09 117.94. OC s 1O. 19 2. 04 2552. 210. OO S 0.02 0.00 4.95. OC S 1OO. OO 20. 04 25056. 223. OO S 0. 02 0. 00 n , • &

UU \ »r.V, 96. OC £ 6.12 1.23 1534. 262.00 6 0.0397. OC S O. 17 0. 03 42. 281. OO S 0. 21 O O4 S3.

* 103. OC £ O. 13 0. 03 33.1O4. OC £ O.2Q 0.06 70105 O' i 0. 16 0. 03 39.1O6 O " O. 37 O. O7 92.

HO. CONTRACTOR_____________CONTRACT NO.

TNSTRUHENT

"fctJN NUMBER

TUNE CHECK;

50

75

95

96

173

174

-il*

176

177

ID fiiV DATE $|ft ?-r

If OC REPORT NO.

: /f6Q

ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA

15 - 40% of the base peaX






5 - 9% of mass 174

Greater than 95%, 'but less than101% of 174

5 - 9% of mass 176

TIME 013S"

ANALYST &6***

\ RELATIVE ABUNDANCE

Wft*loo1.-%D./?

froMl «*}

' M *«y. t$

lvalue in parenthesis is % of mass 174.'Value in parenthesis is % of mass 176.

Comments 2

BRIOOI20

•

»• finX

<Ei-tCO Q*

»*

*oomr COen »-«£22CQU.•* ••

OO

i ^* <Mto«

cox^<w-t

_.O COC*»C^^» ~4G>CSO<r• •oo i* *-.•** ^ O4- CDLJ

rrjP J3E5C

•• >.(AOOC3G

2:<S4Z *CN5 •?y><OC>ce at •%-'»*P= r r>*o wiHfc &p- OQ •• •• f-» FI«.J-.„ rw*j U?<DIn v QL u -4

?slP=zio^to

**

'

«CO

CO

g— —————————————————————————————1

10

S-«

0

i>

^

-T

ffT^

i*S^ ^ ^fc

RRtOOlfei=^

w

C

"«

— C

»•

c-tf

»

e— c

^

»

^

(

«* -List Data: -BFV71TB7 W 171 Bast «/«: 9707/17/87 9:28:OO + 4:02 Call: FC91487 • 3 RIC: 53312.Sample: 44. 5NC BFB ISO 220Conds.: 45<3. 0)-220(20. 0) €8.0 EPA 624tllO to «132 summed - *131 XI. 00

36 0.00 0.00 0. Minima Min Inttn: 8.281 f 0 MaximaMats X RA X RIC Inttn. Mat* % RA % RIC Inten.

36. OO? S 1.86 0.35 187. 96.00 S 6. 78 1.28 680.37. OO? S 10. 51 1.98 1054. 99. 00 1. 28 0.24 128.38. OO? S 9. 07 1.71 910. 100. 00 0. 08 0.02 8.39. OO? S 3. 75 0. 71 376. 102. 00 S 0. 16 0. 03 16.40. OO S 1. 49 0.28 149. 105. 00 S 0. 42 0.08 42.41. 00 S 2. 61 0.49 262. 106.00 0. 53 0. 10 53.43. OO S 4. 24 0. 80 425. 108. 00 0. 15 0. 03 15.44.00 S 1.88 0.35 189. 110.00 0.62 0.12 62.45. OO S 7. 14 1.34 716. 111.00 S 0. 31 0. 06 31.47. OO 3. 18 0. 60 319. 112.00 0. 43 0.08 43.48. 00 0. 44 0. 08 44. 113. 00 0. 26 0. 05 26.49. OO 6. 23 1. 17 625. 115. 00 S 0. 64 0. 12 64.50. 00 S 34. 37 6. 47 3448. 116. 00 0. 65 0. 12 65.51. OO S 9. 62 1. 81 965. 117. 00 S 0. 24 0. 05 24.52.00 S 0.11 0.02 11. 125.00 0.11 0.02 11.53. 00 S 0. 15 0.03 15. 127. 00 0. 33 0. 06 33.54.OO S 0.32 0.06 32. 129.00 0.53 0.10 53.55. OO S 1. 95 0.37 196. 130. 00 ' 0. 12 0. 02 12.56.00 S 1.35 0.25 135. 133.00 S 0.72 0.14 72.57. OO S 5. 86 1. 10 588. 137. 00 0. 11 0. 02 11.60. t>0 S 0. 61 0. 11 61. 139. 00 0. 14 0. 03 14.61.00 S 4.93 0.93 495. 141. OO S 1.02 0.19 102.62.00 5.46 1.03 548. 143.00 0.44 0.08 44.63.00 S 3.20 0.60 321. 149.00 S 1.10 0.21 110.67.00 S 0.35 0.07 35. 150.00 0.12 0.02 12.68.OO S 12.72 2.39 1276. 152.00 0.13 0.02 13.69. 00 S 11. 06 2.08 1110. 153. 00 O. 11 0. 02 11.70. OO S 1.96 0.37 197. 156.00 0.08 0.02 8.71. OO S 1.48 0.28 148. 159.00 0.16 0.03 16.73.OO S 4.73 0.89 475. 163.00 0.13 0.02 13.74. OO 815. 35 2.89 1540. 165.00 0. 23 0. 04 23.75. OO S 56. 78 10. 68 5696. 168. 00 0. 42 0. 08 42.76. OO S 4.39 0.83 440. 169.00 O. 26 0.05 26.77. 00 S 0.89 0. 17 89. 170. 00 0. 49 0. 09 49.78. OO S 0. 83 0. 16 83. 173. 00 0. 19 0. 04 19.79. OO S 4. 66 0.88 467. 174. OO S 70. 02 13. 18 7024.80. OO 1.80 0.34 181. 175.00 3.79 0.71 380.81. OO S 3.27 0.62 328. 176. 00 8 68. 82 12. 95 6904.82. 00 S 1.48 0.28 148. 177.00 3.64 0.68 365.83. OO S 0. 84 0. 16 84. 193. 00 0. 53 0. 10 53.85. 00 S 0. 14 0.03 14. 205. 00 0. 08 0. 02 8.86.00 S 0.31 0.06 31. 208.00 1.27 0.24 127.87. 00 S 3. 02 0. 57 303. 209. 00 0. 30 0.06 30.88.00 S 3.21 0.60 322. 219.00 0.20 0.04 20,90. 00 1. 17 0. 22 117. 223. 00 0. 46 A*l W) 0 I 2 2*6,91. OO S 0. 11 0.02 11. 262.00 0. 23 0.04 23,92.00 SO. 20 0.04 20. 281.00 8 0.33 0.06 33.93.00 S 2.36 0.44 237.94.OO S 6. 97 1.69 900.95.OO S 1OO. OO 18.82 10032.

lu8 N

1 Vi

8 4

T

£

t

•X«

ll

klt

it

S.

•w

o

flRI

£*sS

Vi

412/733-116!LABORATORY SERVICES One Wangle Drive, Export, PA 15632

General Data Table

Client: Mr. Joe Forco Antech Project No.: 88-0158AMO Pollution Services Receipt Date: 2/8/88R.D. 2, Box 3X1B Verbal Report Date: 2/15/88Canonsburg, PA 15317 Report Date: 2/16/88

Page 1 of 1

Reference: Soil Characterization; OHM York Auto Body; Project No. 254-87;Purchase Order No. J5162-E-38268

SampleIdentification

A -B -C -D -E -

y F -G -H -

10001004101010151017104010441445<2>

Benzene '*'

<56<5<5<5<5<5<5

Toluene'1'

19 '67<5<56714

Xylene*1*

2011191127111117

'1'Analyses performed and reported on an as-received basis using Methods 5030 and8020 (PID detector) as referenced in: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,1986, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, 3rd ed., Office of SolidWaste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C. This method is equivalent to EPAMethod 602 with calibration using five nonzero standards.

^2)Chain of custody form identifies sample as H-1045; sample container marked asH-1445. Harry Smith (2/15/88) advised to identify sample as H-1445.

App roved: _ ___Thomas W. HillVice President, Technical Services

AR1001 21*

QA Reporting SheetSoil Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary

Volatile*: EPA Method 8020<1>

Client: Mr. Joe PorcoAMO Pollution ServicesR.D. 2, Box 311BCanonsburg, PA 15317

Parameter Analyzed: Trifluorotoluene

Antech Project No.: 88-0158Date of Report: 2/16/88

SampleIdentification

A -B -C -D -E -v «•G -H -B -B -

100010041010101510171040104414451004 Duplicate1004 Spike

Blank

Units

%%ZZZZZZZZZ

Result

120117

. 120113103110113113107113127

Method referenced in: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986, TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, 3rd ed., Office of SolidWaste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C. This method is equivalentto EPA Method 602 with calibration using five nonzero standards.

AR100I25

QA Reporting SheetMatrix Spike Summary of Volatile*

EPA Method 8020<1>

Client: Mr. Joe PorcoAMO Pollution ServicesR.D. 2, Box 311BCanonsburg, PA 15317

Antech Project No.: 88-0158Date of Report: 2/16/88

Sample Identification

Parameter

BenzeneTolueneXylene

Units

ug/gVg/g

yg/g

B-1004

6611

B-1004Duplicate

<57

19

Blank

<5<5<5

Matrix SpikePercent Recovery

(Z)

1029964

*1'Analyses performed and reported on an as-received basis using Methods5030 and 8020 (FID detector) as referenced in: U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency, 1986, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846,3rd ed., Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.This method is equivalent to EPA Method 602 with calibration using fivenonzero standards.

ARI 00 I 26

-ta*j LJ*>I

!•( i

1*1§-iLiJ.

C.JJ.

licete. :

J»f2B'orf* P

£H.F

Ul

^

V,

a

^

; *••

p.\\i«4

)

*

.*•

*

1:ik>S*»•*

s.•»**Methrxl

ooIs)

0,

c.C

•WWi •

Purpose oi'--•-''•

S

So-w

' XO

ront sheet if

<D

S

ro

•

N

j•r

- '

t

f

£

?g

r

i5?i»>d

f-

**»»

A

^

•••••

>»•»r\

|0&%'S-3

""

f..': '

> f

I.'

j

1" oJ 1ft

2

TRANSFERNUMBER

iim *

3 -«S *

(3 -it

5 Sa

»:.35

I. n

-4

ffl

T' ° u£_

H ' •

3 ——— \r- .i*. *S i" • - • • • • ir • - • - t§/• ... \Cj ' CJ NJ ^8 1 . .

:-3 Q tE J? 92'^ :Q O o !f a - nt •.

ll 1 ll?•» ^ • Ô . **!l

j- £ <*t ' "S 'i" rr fl) ra :f g- P.-"'* ?

• B -ft. S -J' OT • . in Srf ..-g f t** [& * ' - ^

tfl • *;1 ' Ol• f c tGJ V) O H

° ' .• . R ^ j•* **.' tH 'ON [

O O» tC r_i 5s • " • 5j - I"n ' u> pi ' i^ d1- n O b«.| sp* t^* ' C

:.B, »'..'§ i!— ' D* •«" " O 0* tQ • *• • nt tQ •

i; . & •• o\ 5* r

• 5> '$ f.' >.'•> ». /s -%j'W ..:•?':. §-'gi' w s . to'...w i — • . . •_ ^^h

" -J 3 P5T Co £

•"'R 5. .iv ,-.-5E ' ' • ^/ " . '

' . •'•J51 "= •'"H .

"0 - "- --

. • •' 03 CB ' • Cn U" • •?* ' U) . M . ' . i— '

P m rs '--3 M o ' o = 03 • >1 |-» >.' :-» i-* •-"•-!-* t-* (-•_ o o o o o o o o1 **. .rf.-. ,t* M 1-* I-1 O O) tjl if»> O — i Ul O 16" O1 .^

1 ' • • . ..- ' -• ' • " • • • ' .•T . • .

. ' ' 1 • ' '-* . H*

K. m

? ^ . ' . f'

1 ' ( • ' - . . . ' : ' . ' •

? • " :- • • • ' • ' • ' • ' •

F / ' , . ff"-:[• ' ( —— —— : ———— ; —————— - ———— |.

""• • • fi{ • • • • , " " . '

n P• » • - . ' 3; aj .! . ^-^ : <; - . • '.

j . ' • • ' . " ' - ,• . W IT-. : . . - ' . : ' - -

5 . •' . • . - . . ' • * " . ' .' .'...•

•." • .' • ' • • ' . •

!: -. ' •.-.•: • •'. ' , ......-•- -I'

. . . ' • • • • . . . - .

'••'-•.--• • ! . . ' • • • . '. " '• ' ' '

; '"

Km

^ 9

O C 'BER ft SIZE .ONTAINERS

• -'_• .•;•-.,•

1• :•••/.!. ••

-•-:•

M S

*' E

!• **Q

"8-'':.'"•

o'ri §3 • |

$ . .

i-.::-:'

.*•• •

<«

in' .•§

o ' .•-

'-»' :'."?n 5

j . ... . ' •.'O : ' : . • '

3 ...

firaiM;-; 1r* '" i"** ..' -9

lof Vr

IX '{§f| P;< x

•||S 1• »

*,*

•'••-• o. . '•v . I • •'

• z • -O :"fl

••'•'•' o ' :.. ' --'C . i

CD ;TODY RECORD

V O ... !'i. '. ' f*j* i

Ev;;oO ':•,' '•'•'. i

i.-»i-' -to127 .•-'• : ' 10' ;

CD !00 j

APPENDIX E «ANALYTICAL RESULTS

A R I O O I 2 8

APPENDIX F

CORRESPONDENCE

AR 100 I 29

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III

Emergency Response Section303 Methodist Building

i Wheeling, West Virginia 26003

Bill Jones202 Sidney StreetOak Hill, WV 25901

Dear Mr. Jones,

As per your request, I am informing you of the results of thesoil sample taken from your yard on January 25, 1988, by EPA'sTechnical Assistance Team.

The sample was analyzed and found to contain concentrationsof Benzene (less than 5 parts per million), Toluene (6 ppm), andXylene (11 ppm). These compounds are widely used as constituentsin gasoline and other industrial products and were found in suchlow concentrations in the above sample that, being indicative ofthe soil in your yard, should be regarded as common occurrenceand of no threat to human health or the environment according tothe most recent toxicological standards.

Should you have any additional inquiries concerning thismatter, please contact me at the above location. Thank you.

Benton H.WilmothEPA Region III, OSC

A R I Q O I 3 0

POLREP #1 - Ray York Auto Body Shop Drum SiteOak Hill, Fayette County, WV

ATTENTION: Tom Massey and Tim Fields

I. Situation (1700 hours - 8/13/87)

A. Pam Hayes, WVDNR Division of Waste Management, notifiedOSC Ben Wilmoth of the presence of unlabeled, potentially leakingdrums which had been abandoned at the former site of Ray YorkAuto Body Shop in Oak Hill, Fayette County, WV. Approximatelytwenty (20) drums of paint sludge and solvents outside of theformer body shop lay uncontrolled with a large area of vegetativestress about it.

B. OSC tasked.TAT with performing a preliminary assessmentand sampling on July 1, 1987.

C. On 8/5/87, OSC/TAT received analytical data from the 7/1assessment, results confirmed presence of paint sludge andsolvents for nine of the drums on site. Lead in concentrationsof 973 mg/kg as well as solvents such as acetone (670 ppm) andtotal xylenes (1,000 ppm) were detected on site.

D. The OSC recognized the threat to human health and theenvironment and enacted $50K Delegation of Authority (14-l-A)for mitigative action, on August 12, 1987, OSC issued DeliveryOrder No. 7445-03-004 to ERCS for $35K to initiate removalactions at the site.

E. Authorized budget and estimated costs to date (COB8/13/87):

Cost to Date CeilingEPA $ l.K $ 2.5KEPA HQ (15%) 1.9K 7.5KTAT 1.5K 5.OKERCS 10.OK 35.OK

Total $50.OK

F. Personnel on scene: EPA - 1, TAT - 2, ERCS - 6

G. Weather: Warm and sunny, 85 degrees

II. Actions Taken

A. OSC and TAT arrived on scene (1400 hours) 8/12/87.

B. ERCS notified OSC of contractual difficulties betweenO.H. Materials and AMO Pollution Services which resulted in afailure to mobilize on the part of ERCS until 1700 hours on8/12/87.

C. ERCS arrived on scene at 0800 hours 8/13yB7|cleanup operations. *? !

D. ERCS transferred solid and liquid waste from drums onsite into removal drums and then deconned, wrapped, and sealedthe site drums for removal. Stained soil was removed from thearea directly under the drums and was drummed for disposal.

E. OSC contacted EPA/OPA to update as to site activity.

F. OSC contacted D. J. Austin, WVDNR, for temporary wastegenerator I.D. Number (IWVP000000800).

III. Future Plans

A. ERCS to transfer materials on site to AMO PollutionServices for temporary storage pending final disposal.

B. ERCS to take post cleanup samples from contaminated soilarea.

C. OSC to await results of ERCS post cleanup sampling todetermine the effectiveness of the removal and if further cleanupactions are necessary.

D. OSC/TAT/ERCS to demoblize from site pending completionof removal actions 8/13/87.

Benton M. Wilmoth, OSCU.S. EPA Region IIIWheeling, WV

AR100I32

Polrep |2 - Ray York Auto Body Shop D:Oak Hill, Fayette County, WV

ATTENTION: Tom Massey and Tim Fields

I. Situation (1800 hrs., 8/14/87)

A. CERCLA removal actions completed this date. All wastefrom drums and surrounding contaminated soils transported to AMOPollution Services TSD (Canonsburg, PA) to await final disposaldisposition.

B. Media interest extremely high.

C. Estimated Cost to Date (COB 8/14/87)

Cost Ceiling

EPA 1.5K 2.5KEPA/HQ 2.5K 7.5KTAT 2.5K 5.OKERCS 12.5K 35.OK

19. OK 50. OK

D. Weather: Hot and sunny 90 degrees.

II. Actions Taken »A. Transfer of materials from origin drums of poor

integrity to ERCS drums results in a total of 21 drums fordisposal purposes. Old drums to be crushed and shredded.

B. ERCS performed post cleanup sampling on removal area.

C. OSC signed State of Pennsylvania, Hazardous WasteShipping Manifest, (PAB 3320376) .

D. TAT/ERCS demobilized from site, 1200 hours, 8/14/87.

III. Future Plans

A. OSC awaiting information on final disposal from AMOPollution Services*

B* OSC awaiting results of ERCS post cleanup sampling todetermine if any further actions are necessary.

C. TAT to await final disposal information as well as ERCSsampling results to begin drafting OSC report.

HI i iBenton M. WUtobth, OSCUS EPA - Region IIIWheeling, WV 26003

/1RIOOI33

POLREP #3 - Ray York Auto Body Dump SiteOak Hill, Fayette Co., WV

ATTENTION: Tim Fields and Bob Caroncc: Steve Jarvela

I. situation (1800 hrs., 1/25/88)

A. OSC/TAT received analytical data from 8/14/87 post-cleanup sampling at the Ray York Site on 10/16/87. Resultsindicated high concentrations of benzene, toluene and xyleneswere still present in the soil in the drum removal area.

B. OSC, Ben Wilmoth initiated removal actions to completeremoval of contaminated soil on 1/13/88. ERCS subcontractors,AMO Pollution Services, of Canonsburg, PA to complete removal.

C. Personnel on scene: EPA-1, TAT-2, ERCS-4.

D. Estimated costs to date (COB 1/25/88):

Cost Ceiling

EPA 1.8 2.5KEPA HQ. 3.3 7.5KTAT 3.8 ' 5.OKERCS 16.5 35.OK

TOTAL 25.4 50.OK

E. Weather: Overcast, cold: 30°. Five to nine inches ofsnow predicted over next 24 hour period.

II. Actions Taken

A. OSC/TAT/ERCS mobilized to Holiday Inn, Oak Hill, WV 2200hours, 1/24/88, site meeting was held to coordinate logistics ofcleanup operations.

B. OSC/TAT/ERCS arrived on scene 0800 hours 1/25/87 to begincleanup operations.

C. ERCS excavated, drummed and staged 16 drums of solventcontaminated soil inside of the Ray York Shop pending acceptancefrom TSD facility. This building is secured by ERCS contractor.

D. TAT/ERCS conducted extent-of-contamination study andfound pockets of concentrated liquid solvent wastes isolated inthe soil, where solvent drums had been removed.

E. OSC contacted the WVDNR (Zeiss) and obtainedwaste generator ID# WVT000000836.

F. OSC Wilmoth contacted and briefed EPA/OPA Ray Germann onsite activities to date.

III. Future Plans

A. TAT/ERCS to continue extent-of-contamination study. Allexcavation on site suspended pending additional sampling andanalytical results obtained through extent-of-contaminationstudy.

B. TAT/ERCS to demobilize from site 1/27/88.

C. OSC to remain in contact with EPA/OPA with updates onsite activities.

D. OSC/TAT to draft Additional Funding Request for theremoval/disposal of additional contaminated soil found on site.

Benton Wilmoth, OSCUS EPA - Region IIIWheeling, WV 26003

A R I O O I 3 5

POLBEP 14 - RAY YORK AUTO BODY SHOP DRUM SITEOAK HILL, FAYETTE COUNTY, WV

ATTENTION: BOB CARON, STEVE JARVELA, TIM FIELDS

I. SITUATION (1300 HOURS - 2/5/88)

A. ON 2/4/86 EPA/OPA WAS NOTIFIED BY AN OAK HILL CITYOFFICIAL THAT PERSONS UNKNOWN FORCED ENTRY INTO THE RAY YORKBODY SHOP ON 2/3/88. SIXTEEN (16) DRUMS OF SOIL CONTAMINATEDWITH PAINT WASTE SOLVENTS AND AWAITING TSD APPROVAL ARE STAGEDWITHIN THE BUILDING AND POSE A THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH. OSCWILMOTH REQUESTED PROMPT REMOVAL OF THE DRUMS TO MITIGATE THETHREAT AND COORDINATED TAT AND AMO SERVICES TO PHOTO-DOCUMENTSITE ACTIVITIES AND TRANSPORT THE DRUMS TO FINAL DISPOSAL.

B. ESTIMATED COSTS TO DATE (C.O.B. 2/4/87):COST TO DATE CEILING

EFA * 1.9K * 2.5KEPA HQ (15*) 3.4K 7.5KTAT 3-5K 5.OKERCS 17.OK 35.OK

TOTAL $25.8K $50.OK

II. ACTIONS TAKEN

A, JOE PORCO (AMO) OBTAINED APPROVAL TO DISPATCH 16 DRUMS OFSOIL CONTAMINATED WITH BENZENE, TOLUENE, AND XYLENE TO THERMALKEMIN ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA ON MONDAY, 2/8/88 FOR FINAL DISPOSAL.

B. TAT CONTACTED EPA/OPA AND UPDATED ON CURRENT SITE STATUS.

III. FUTURE PLANS

A. ERCS/TAT TO MOBE TO SITE 1200 HOURS SATURDAY, 2/6/88,TO TRANSFER THE DRUMS FROM THE RAY YORK SHOP TO FINAL STORAGEAND PHOTODOCUMENT SITE ACTIVITIES RESPECTIVELY.

B. OSC AWAITING ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF THE SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN1/25/88.

C. OSC/TAT TO DRAFT ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUEST FOR THEREMOVAL/DISPOSAL OF ADDITIONAL CONTAMINATED SOIL POUND ON SITE.

BENTON M. WILMOTR, OSCU.S. EPA REGION IIIWHEELING, WV ARIOOI36

POLREP #5 - RAY YORK AUTO BODY SHOP DRUM SITEOAK HILL, FAYETTE COUNTY, WV

ATTENTION: BOB CARON, TIM FIELDS, STEVE JARVELA

I. SITUATION (1200 HOURS, 2/8/88)

A. FIFTEEN (15) DRUMS OF CONTAMINATED SOIL REMOVED FROMTHE RAY YORK BODY SHOP ARE CURRENTLY ENROUTE TO THERMALKEM INROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA FOR FINAL DISPOSAL.

B. ESTIMATED COSTS TO DATE:

COST CEILINGEPA 1.2K 2.5KEPA HQ (15$) 5.6K 7.5KTAT 3.8K 5.OKERCS 32.5K 35.OK

TOTAL 43- 1K 50. OK

II. ACTIONS TAKENi

A. UNDER OSC DIRECTION, AMO POLLUTION SERVICES, INC. ANDTAT ARRIVED AT THE RAY YORK SITE 1200 HOURS, 2/6/88. AMOTRANSFERRED 15 DRUMS OF SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PAINT WASTES STAGEDIN THE RAY YORK SHOP TO A BOX TRUCK FOR TRANSPORT TO THERMALKEMIN ROCK HILL SOUTH CAROLINA FOR FINAL DISPOSAL.

B. TAT MONITORED AND PHOTO-DOCUMENTED THE REMOVAL.

C. TAT CONTACTED EPA/OPA RAY GERMAHN AND UPDATED HIM ONSITE STATUS.

III. FUTURE PLANS

A. OSC AWAITING ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF POST CLEANUP SAMPLESTAKEN 1/25/88.

B. OSC TO DETERMINE IF FURTHER REMOVAL ACTIONS ARENECESSARY PENDING RECEIPT AND REVIEW OF THE ANALYTICAL DATA.

BENTON WILMOTH, OSCUS EPA - REGION IIIWHEELING, WV 26003

AR100137

POLREP 16 AND FINAL - RAY YORK AUTO BODY SHOP DRUM SITEOAK HILL, FAYETTE COUNTY, WV

ATTENTION: BOB CARON, TIM FIELDS, STEVE JARVELA

I. SITUATION (1700 HOURS, 2/29/88)

A. ANALYSIS OF THE EIGHT EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION SAMPLESCOLLECTED 1/25/88 BY AMO POLLUTION SERVICES, INC. WAS COMPLETEDBY ANTECH LTD LABORATORY SERVICES ON 2/16/88 AND SENT TO WHEELINGTAT FOR REVIEW. RESULTS INDICATED THE PRESENCE OF BENZENE,TOLUENE, AND XYLENE IN CONCENTRATIONS SIGNIFICANTLY BELOWEXPOSURE LIMITS SET BY NIOSH AND OSHA IN THE SOIL SURROUNDING THERAY YORK SHOP.

B. BASED ON THE LAB DATA, THE OSC HAS DETERMINED THATFURTHER REMOVAL ACTIONS AT THE RAY YORK SITE ARE UNNECESSARY.

C. THE TWENTY-ONE DRUMS STAGED IN TSD FROM THE 8/4/8?REMOVAL WERE TRANSPORTED WITH THE 15 DRUMS FROM THE 2/6/88REMOVAL TO THERMALKEM IN ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA ON 2/7/88FOR FINAL DISPOSAL.

D. ESTIMATED COSTS TO DATE (C.O.B., 2/29/88)

COST CEILINGEPA 1.9K 2.5K

^ EPA HQ (15*) 5.9K 7.5KTAT 5.OK 5.OKERCS 32.2K 35.OK

TOTAL 44. OK 50. OK

II. ACTIONS TAKEN

A. OSC WILMOTH WAS CONTACTED BY TAT AND UPDATED ONANALYTICAL RESULTS THIS DATE.

B. AS FURTHER REMOVAL ACTIONS WERE UNWARRANTED, OSCCLOSED ALL REMOVAL ACTIONS AS OF 2/29/88.

C. OSC SENT A COPY OF THE ANALYTICAL RESULTS TO BILLJONES, RESIDENT ADJACENT THE RAY YORK SHOP. MR. JONES REQUESTEDA COPY OF THE REPORT AS RIS YARD WAS SAMPLED ON 1/25/88 AS PARTOF THE EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION SAMPLING ACTIVITY.

III. FUTURE PLANS

A. OSC/TAT TO PREPARE OSC REPORT AND SUBMIT FINAL DRAFT TOPRINTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NCP.

B. OSC TO DISTRIBUTE OSC REPORT UPON RECEIPT FHw'00138PRINTING, ~

BENTON WILMOTH, OSCUS EPA - REGION IIIWHEELING, WV 26003

POLREP #7 and FINAL* - RAY YORK AUTO BODY SHO?*bRUM SfTEOAK HILL, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

ATTENTION: Bob Caron, Tim Fields and Steve Jarvela

I. Situation (1200 hours, 5/1/88)A. The OSC has determined that additional monies are

necessary to complete the final disposal of the thirty-six drumsat Thermal Kern final disposal facility.

B. On April 22, 1988, pursuant to the Delegation ofAuthority 14-1-A, (9/13/87), and as amended by Section 401 (E) ofSuperfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), anincrease in the amount of $50,000 for the Ray York Body Shop DrumSite was approved by the Regional Administrator, James M. Seif.The new approved total project ceiling is now $100,000.

C. Estimated costs to date (C.O.B. 4/30/88)Cost Ceiling

EPA 2.4K 9.5KEPA HQ (15%) 9.2K 13.5KTAT 6.OK 9.2KERCS 52.8K 67.8K

TOTAL 70.4K 100.OKII. Actions Taken

A. TAT assisted OSC in preparation of additional fundingrequest for $50,000 to complete disposal of the thirty-six drumsremoved from this site.

B. On 4/22/88, additional funds requested for this sitewere approved by James M. Seif, Regional Administrator.III. Future Plans

A. OSC/TAT to prepare OSC report and submit final draft toprinting in accordance with the NCP.

B. OSC to distribute OSC report upon receipt from printing,

* This polrep is in addition to "Polrep #6 and Final" submitted2/29/88. r "v

Benton Wilmoth, OSCUS EPA - Region IIIWheeling, WV

flRI00139

APPENDIX I

DELIVERY ORDER/PROCUREMENT REQUEST

AR1001

O.H. Materials Corp.16406 U.S. Route 224 Ea»tP.O. Box 551Findlay, Ohio 45839-0551419-423-3526

lex 298248 OHMItRlRCAi

OHM

August 12, 1987

Mr. Benton WilmothUSEPA Region III303 Methodist Buildingllth & Chapline StreetsWheeling, WV 26003

Dear Mr. Wilmoth:

RE: Contract #68-01-7445; ERCS Zone I

This letter shall confirm that O.H. Materials Corp. hasreceived Delivery Order No. 7445-03-004 for the York BodyShop Site in Oak Hill, West Virginia, and has started workas per your request.

Sincerely,

JcJhn E. CopusDeputy Program ManagerERCS Zone I

JEC:wjr

pc: Richard Mueller, Contracting OfficerSteve Jarvela, Regional DFOFile I5162-E4-004

^ AR I O O U I


•

DELIVERY ORDER FOR EMERGENCY

(This delivery order is issued subject to all farms and conditions of the contract identified in Slock 2.11. DATE OF ORDER

y 8-to -872. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. ORDER NUMBER

4. TIME OF INITIAL ORDER flf initial orderwas verbal)(Specify Time Zone)

6. DELIVERY ORDER CEILING AMOUNT (Obligated Amount)

35*. 000.DAM

6. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATAAppropriation Number Document Control No. Account Number Object Class

7e. ISSUED TO: CONTRACTOR (Name. Address, and ZIP Code) 8a. ISSUED BY: ORDERING OFFICE (Name. Address, end ZIP Code)

5-5- /

7b. PROGRAM MANAGER (Name and Phone Number) 8b. EPA REGION/USCG DISTRICT 8C.ZONE

7c. RESPONSE MANAGER (Name and Phone Number) 8d. ON-SCENE COORDINATOR (Name and Phone Number)

9. RESPONSE LOCATION (Site Name and/or Address and ZIP Code) 10. CONTRACTOR REQUIRED ON SITE /Date am/ T/me/(Specify Time Zone) J&"* D AM

11. REQUIRED WORK COMPLETION DATE

1 2. STATEMENT OF WORKThe Contractor shall furnish the necessary personnel, materials, services, facilities, and otherwise do all thingsnecessary for or incident to the performance of the work set forth below:

Soil

Vy 13. ORDERING OFFICERNAME/TITLE SIGNATURE DATE

ERA Form 1900-69 (11-83, ORDERING OFFICER/OSC ; ^ U .OPO

(Shaded areas are for use of procurement office only)_______ _____ Page ofUo environment*! Protection Agency

Washington, DC 20460 „ ... - .B«zt WilaotiiProcurementRequest/Order

l, Name oi Originator

3. Mail Code3HH22

4. Telephone Number304-233-9331

[tern Required

6. Signature of Originator 7. Recommended Procurement MethodQ Competitive Q Other than full and open competition Q Sol* tourcs imall purchis*

Jeliver To (Project Manager)Stere Jarvel*

9. Address841 Chestnut St. Phil*, PA 19107

10. Mail Code3HV25

11. Telephone Number213 597-7915

12.FinancialOeu

a. Appropriation

63/20x3145b. Servicing Finance Office Number NOTE: Item 12<d) Document Type — Contract = "C,"

Purchase Order * "P"

.. FMOUse .(0(13 digit!

DocumentControl Number(e) (6 digits)

Account Numberif} f JO digits)

ObjectClass

(g) 14 digits)Amount (h)

Dollars Cent£70067 35*000

13. Suggested Source (N»me. Address. ZIP Cede. Pftone/Contect)OH MaterialsFlndlay OB

14. Amount of moneycommitted tt:

D OriginalOIncreaseD Decrease

1B. For Small Purchase* Only: Contracting Office ia autho-rized to exceed the amount shown in Block 12(h) by 10% or•100, whichever ii less.

Ores DNO16. Approval*

a. Branch/OfficeThomas C.

Date d. Property Management Officer/Oesignee Date

b. Division/Office f xX .-v*!. x~w'-->Stephen R

Date e. Other (Specify) Date

c. Funds listed in Block 12 and Block M (if any) areavailable and reserved. (Signature of Certifying Qfficia. iRich Measlmer

Date f. Other (Specify) Date

177 Date or Order 18. Order Number 19. Contract Number (if any) 20. Discount Terms

21. FOB Point 22. Delivery to FOB Point by On or before (Date) 23. Person Talcing Order/Quote and Phone No.

Contractor (Name, address, ZIP Code) 25. Type of OrderD a. Purchase

Reference your quote (See block 23)

Plaaae furnish the above on the terms specified on both sides of this order and ontha attached sheets, if any, including delivery as Indicated.

Q b. Delivery provisions on tha reverse are deleted. Tha delivery order issubject to the terms and conditions of the contract. (See Block 19)

C. G Orel G Written G Confirming

26. Schedulehem

Number Supplies or Service*W

QuantityOrdered

(e)UnitId)

EstimatedUnit Price

fa)UnitPriceto Amount

(g)QuantityAccepted

(h)

SIZE HAHEs York Body Shop

SII£ IDs7 1C

LOCATIONi County fayctteCity OafchlllState OT

COtmUCT i 63-01-7443

DELITOtT OSDER KOi 7445-03-004

IOOIU3Total*

27. United States of AmericaBy f Signature)

28. Typed Name and Title of Contracting Officer

EPA Form 1900-8 (Rev. 9-86) Previous editions are obsolete. COPY 5-RECEIVING

/Shaded areas ere for use of procurement office only)___________________________ ___ Page of/ f i* US environmental Protection >/ I X, Washington, DC 20460/ • ' I T ' •*

&EPA ProcurementRequest/Order

i. name of urtgmaior

3. Mail Code3HV22

4. Telephone Number304-233-9831

2. Date ot Requisition

10/37

Signature of Originator 7. Recommended Procurement MethodLJ Competitive LJ Other than full and open competition O Sola tource small purchase

8. Deliver To {Project Mineger)rhonas hassey

9. Address841 Chestnut St., PhllA., PA 19107 3HB22

10. Mail Code 11. Telephone Number213 597-9893

12.FinancialData

a, Appropriation60/20x8145

b. Servicing Finance Office Number NOTE: Item 12(d) Document Type — Contract * "C,"Purchase Order» "P"

.. FMO Use .ic) (13 digits)

DocumentControl Number(e) (6 digits)

Account Number(f) (10 digits)

ObjectClass

(g) (4 digits)Amount (h)

Dollars Cent

13. Suggested Source (Ntme. Address. ZIP Code. Phone/Contset)

OS Material*

14. Amount of moneycommitted is:

D OriginalD IncreaseD Decrease

18. For Small Purchase* Only: Contracting Office is autho-rized to exceed the amount shown in Block 12(h) by 10% or1100. whichever Is less.

Ores DNO

16. Approvalsa. Branch/Office

C-

Date d. Property Management Officer/Designee Date

t>. Division/Office Data e. Other (Specify) Date

c Funds listed in Block 12 and BTock 1 Sfif any) are ~l)ete~available and reserved\JSignature of Certifying Qffitie* I

f. Other (Specify) Date

17. Date of Order 18. Order Number 19. Contract Number (if any) 20. Discount Terms

1. FOB Point 22. Delivery to FOB Point by On or before (Date) 23. Person Taking Order/Quote and Phone No.

24. Contractor (Neme. address. ZIP Code) 25. Type of OrderD e. Purchase

Reference your quote (See block 23)

Please furnish the above on the terms specified on both sides of thisordar and onthe attached sheets, if any. Including delivery as Indicated.

Db. Delivery provisions on the reverse era deleted. The delivery order issubject to the terms and conditions of the contract. (See Block IS)

C. D Orel D Wrinen G Confirming

26. ScheduleItem

Number(a)

Supplies or Services(b)

QuantityOrdered

(e)Unit(d)

EstimatedUnit Price

(a)UnitPrice Amount

(g)QuantityAccepted

(W

SITS BAHai York Body Shop

SITS H>1

LOCATION: County* Fayvtte CountyCity: OafehlllStates WT

CJSKR * 7445-03-004. . <&_. . AR QOiU

Total*27. United States of America\v By (Signature)\

28. Typed Name and Title of Contracting Officer

APPENDIX J

MANIFESTS

A R I O O I i f t S

P. O. Box 2063Harris burg, PA 17120 * S l5 V

Please print or type. (Form designed for use on ettte (12-prtchl typewriter.)EB-8WM-81;REV- 10/84 __________Form Approved. 0MB Ho. 2000-0404. empires 7-31-86________

t UNIFORM HAZARDOUSWASTE MANIFEST

1. Generator's US EPA ID No. De«5SmMoU/- V- P O & O Q O O g 0- 0| & I- t

2. Page 1Iof

Information in the shaded areasIB not required by Federal lewbut Is required bv State lew.

I. Generator's Name and Mailing Address

4. generator's Phone i

A. State Menrfoet Doeument Number

PAB 3320376YORK AUTO

Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA tO NumberFbLornog tjpvM-rs />ic I P-AbO"

C. State Trsm. 10PA-AH I 0- /'S

7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number D. Transporter's Phone iI. Stale Trane.»

fl. Deslgneted FedHty Neme and She Address 10. US EPA ID NumberAMO FbU-UTto/J SEK.ViCCS IHC

tS3P? iP-A-C»03gq-tVl

PA-AH I ' ' ' I•. Trantporwr-t Phone I W/Ua. state Paoaty's p Not RequiredH. Feo«tY's Phone (

11. US DOT Description (Including Proper Shipping Neme. Hexerd Class, end tt> Number)

WASTE

12. Container*

Ho. Type

10.0

M

13.Tot el

Quantity

14.UnitrVt/VoH

I.Waste No.

d.

J. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above {Include physical stele end haxont eodel^ Haz. Code Physical State Hez. Code Physical State

.. LU LUK. Handing Codes for Wastes Listed Above

b. igm -.LLJ LU b.18. Special Handling Instructions and Additional lnform*tton

AN\0 PoULOTiOiJ SERVICES JMC.

16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: Itwftby declare th«ih«con»nri of thfc consi0nm«ni art fully and cccurMtlr dMcnbwt Bbov* by proper snipping nam* «nd an d»ii(i«l,packed, markwi and labalad. and arc in all rMpacts in propar condirton for iranaport by highway according to applicable international and national gownmem ragulationa.UnlM* I am a small Quantiiy genarator who haa »tan attempted by alatute or reguleiion from the duly to make a waate minimisation certification under Section 30O2 (bl of RCRA. I altocertify that I have a program in place to reduce volume and icxicity of waaie generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and I have selected the method oftreatment, ateraoe. or oitpotil currently available to me which minimum the present and future three! to humen health and the environment.

Printed/Typed Name j Signature | » « I e Month Dey Year-o>

COCOroo

CD

17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of MaterialsName Stgnettyy * M SI Month Day Year

18. Trenfoorter 2 Achnowfadgement of Baeriot of MaterialsPrinted/Typed Neme I Signetun Month Day Year

I I I19. Discrepancy Indication Space

F"AC

1 20. Facttty Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted hi K*nA8R I Q Q I U &

Printed/Typed neture . m Month Oey Veer

riftSPA Form 8700-22 (3-84)

COPY 3-TSD FACILITY. MAIL TO GENERATOR

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES /0KK 8C 4' Skcp CûU (iBureau of Waste Management i ' .

P. O. Box 2063Hanisburg, PA 17120

Please print or type. (Form designed for use on eRte (12-pitchl typewriter.)gB-8WM-81:REV. 10/84 Form Approved. 0MB No. 2000-0404. Expires 7-31-86

r VUNIFORM HAZARDOUSWASTE MANIFEST

1. Generator's US EPA ID No.u/- V- P o a o o o o g p. oj

2. Page 1* I

Information In the shaded areasto not required by Federal towbut to required by State tow.

3. Generator's Name and Mating Address

•.generator's Phone t

' _^. A--

A. State Manifest Document Number

PAB 3320376B. State Oen. ID

YORK. AUTO6. Transporter 1 Company Name 6. US EPA ID Number

AMD teLumohi s& icws /*vc \ P-AC. State Trans. IDPA-AH | O

7. Transporter 2 Company Name 8. US EPA ID Number£DOr*

LD. Transporter's Phone I tfj * ?3J— SffV.

9. Deslonated Facllty Neme and She Address 10. US EPA ID NumberI. State Tram. •>PA-AH I

AMO FbULUTioV £E*Vt££« F. Transporter's Phone I WfU •12.1-6466Q. state Faculty's ID Not RequiredH. Facfflly's Phone (

12. Containers

No. Type

13.Total

Quantity

14.Unit

Itft/Voll

I.Waste No.

^ HAXAK&cuS WASTEN

Q

o- c- o

« £ WASTE set-to.,„ ..„. . . .._., g-o-o-o

o

J. Additional Descriptions for Materials Listed Above (Include physical state end ha*erd code)Hex. Code Physical State

NUHai. Code Physical State

LU LUK. HandOng Codes for Wastes Usted Above

-.LU LU b. d.IB. Special Handing Instructions and Additional Information

AMO FOU-UTIO|CF=" THH" AOOVC MATCRtll*. UffaM

L. tviu BE" BC-*v¥*M»*fi*itfe Fir*16. GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by proper shipping name and are tiaatified,

Unleaa I am a email quantity generator who hea been exempted by statute or regulation from the duty to make a wane minlmitation certification under Section 3002 (bl of RCRA. I aliocertify that I have a program in place to reduce volume and toxfcity of wane generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and I have selected the method oftreatment Storage, or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human health and the environment.

Printed/Typod Name Month Day Year

17. Transporter 1 Acknowledgement ofHecofpt of MaterialsName / Bgnatuey y# - y **"*" °** Ytfr

-18._TnfMDOr1er_2 Aeknewfadaament of Reeehrt of MaterialsPrinted/Typed Name I Slgnetun Month Day Year

__________________III-19. Discrepancy Indication-Space

F"A AR I 00 I it?

20. Feeffity Owner or Operator: Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as noted hi hem 19.

Printed/Typed Name" tun f" . j Month D*y Year

EPA Form 8700-22 (3-84)rnov I_TCP\

south Carolina Department of Healthand Environmental Control

003)734-6424

UNIFORM HAZARDOUSWASTE MANIFEST

Inlormafion to Vt« shaded trsu M Mlraqulrad by Fadenl taw. but h&y State am

7. TrineportorlCornptnyNiflw

fl, f rated Facftty NuTws^WaAddrau

16. Spactal Hartdltng

£, t4£f4UttCrf ASC.etMeejofielgr>irMnteMluI a. aeNKKATOVfBlCCimnCATIONt

p ed.r»a/tee<i. end tabe ey* erettta taws of ttM ccsis) of SouVt CaraOna.

Pri /TypadNama . |t i ite*r-*>i- IJlllMtftt,

SgnUun n «_ 1.1' ^J MOrth Day Yav

17. Tfinsportef 1 AcknowledMmant of Receipt of UiMriilsM Mntod/JVpedftoiMa

.a»<*-A fi. Mp*y.«?

18. Tnnsporttr2>Qcnowladflamamo( RecaJptofMiiarttltSflnttur* ...... Month Oty Y«sr

_____________ t . i . • .18. OUcrtpancylndicarionapaca

F»

r ML yeXtUyOwr ofOp<riiyCar1tficrtkx»o(n<aipteln, vrmwrt/TypedNajna Stflnatur* Uonft Oty Yaar

I i I i I>8 fRnv

ând Environmental Control

UNIFORM HAZARDOUSWASTE MANIFEST

Information to IM ahaded ATMS h MIrequire* byfadetil taw, but to by&ttatt*

1 UACPAOKumbar

r/Tr»nep6rtaf 2 Company Ntnw . . •• ..-.. I m EPA C Number . ..'••;'.': ' . ' .' _:__ ' _•'. ' t l .1 1- L l-^l "t i l LOwiflfialadFac Na e dStteAddftM .• 1ft U&B»AK>NumbV

11. U& DOT Owcrlptfon fhcJud/v A«IP*v Sft V ff Mun« Nuavtf Qua. srt.D. Number) 12. ContainedHa Type

13. Total Quantity

AW flJl&O.' ' '»'••'.ft. i.!'--.T- ^ ^ TT Bi1 /

Rl- 1"nit

I I I

I_I I I I I

f I f I

dUJ-| i i i i hi i i i I15. Special Handling I

1*. aBNKKATOffSCenTinCATlOM: |t»ef« d*cl«fee ia oofrtentie«Msooi»lo*iner«e/»l

*M law* of «M tato of Aow*! CaraUrM.M I am • la>g« queine o neratw J«en B el I new* a prognvn to piece fo

m<e edo«e aimenteloIhel to ewedleble to ma end tfwt I «en eAord.

lem<eina*qoerta ffsnenrtOfJhe*e

J/TypadNtraa Stsnttun

iN

O la. Tran»portaf Zetttad/TypadNuna Month Oty V«a/

bj , , . .IJA <| i i i i i

i ? r!i_*'*|y-'. .-_ f- *l>'0>: C«rtrficalion of rocaipl ol najardoua fnateriato cowrcd bvtfib manifest except at notad tn •am 1ft.

UNIFOmAZAROOUSWASTE MANIFEST

South Carolina Department of Healthand Environmental Control

ru- "FEB'18S3SFormAj

AlWffiffifffttofonMlfon to t>« theded araai It netrwjulred by Federal law, but b by Stale few.

0en«raU s Name and MalOnQAddreu

<OeYtarator'iPrH>oa(

7. Transporter a Company Namei i i i i i t i t

Mi UA EPA D NumberOea nit«fFac%nfeme«id8teAddnBM

II Total Quarttty11. US. OOT Description (Including pnpv Shipping Name, Heard Out, and 10 number)

U aw ffdmft&bt -kid, C '**',•.* ^_r » l II l li

p I I

*^»—. ,. - ....,.——»-~ — »-——---.-.—- __ , .f* #(&& tbW)f? & hfl < /}•(<->^ TTT/-.SC/ * 3 Sc/'& u\ £&i l,AA 4l

IS. Spaclal Hanollr.s !nsuvctom and Addftfonal kttormaiton

QKNMATOH'tceilTll'ICATMMt: lhare**y*>cl*re»>rta c«n<enwofe cMfte«jnme»aere»ultyentfam labeled, enet are toe* rtspscia to preper eaneWan Hr Mneportey Mjhwmy eooonUng to appsjceBle tniemaa'onel and Bartonel govenvnem niouieaone enel

precacabie) end a>el l have eetaeted •>o»»»xittca6te meaiodal *mui*M, sionga. or dtoooeaJ cuffenay axllible teBie »«Wch mlnlifri»ee »e) prejesni and Mure aireet •» nmnenhe th and th<e«>v*ronri>en»Ofttliem«eiiie e anlrtyiefte lofJ havettai le •MtaDta M Me ana thai f aan

»onf"«

U.Moled/Typed Name

^«fonetu» ^^^ - . Month Ofct Yeer

PHmad/TypfdNanw

t i H» M i. M.i i l«*M i i i t i I** <|_i i i i i 1"

.C*iifKaikinoffaM#o*hi c> Sejnalart V / ~S 7 Mwm (>•/ V«w

'V

South Carolina Department of Health •u *.*,*.-.,-*aao*fl*«e(,Cokanbi•hone: 00384-680and Environmental Control "OOM*"te—KIM01

00*7344434

FflWTeiTyW Form evasions J tor uaa an aUs IH-pHchT typewrtarl _______________Iniomabon h ** efuided eraa« la

U&CPADNuej(w

Ml U&IPAB Number

11. UC. DOT Deecrlpeon ****** Proper ««¥*« Mm* Murtf Cleat iraf 49

.s><2 ptamrnibiz uwict, si-os.

IB. Special llandHng inatuofone end AMtontf Moneton

•M lava M •*• ajMe e« e*wei Oewa

UNIFORM HAZARDOUSW?Tj MANIFEST

anei »*o an. hwimenc OH iHema ana* ayaiKey fenenMoi.l n> »• •• <• a gaa< i»1» •Hurtlo mumnie isy aiaasj amaiaeini airfeelaet XoaeO »ae*»«i imp • BUfil me***e<,**mt\tiDmeeM»+los*o9er*.

T. Tr AcfcnoeTledoaineot ol Hecalpl aj Uatsrieriranted/Typed NMM" .//e / Montt) Oty Y«w

4 PlMM/TyptdNMieX t . i . l ." Ol«cf«p«ncy Indtcaion Qpaca

»r 'I i « ' » * I*1 'LjLLULjJ1*•I i i i i i I** <l i i i i i IK*

,-d c* Mm •.*,.»« .«< Ofemtx. CattflcaBon ot racayl ol haiantoui maiivUli cnva/oJ by Mi mantfagt except u notod m Bern 1ft. —————————, Unnffi Da/ Yi

i •

Date post:	23-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	ngoduong
View:	214 times
Download:	1 times

AR1000I - semspub.epa.gov · Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) , and as amended by the ... -H-*iHd...

Documents