+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Are Viruses and THMs a Problem in Urban Waste Water...

Are Viruses and THMs a Problem in Urban Waste Water...

Date post: 26-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
35
Are Viruses a Hazard in Waste Water Recharge of Urban Sandstone Aquifers? Hydrogeology Research Group Earth Sciences School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham UK John Tellam, Rae Mackay, Michael Riley, Joanna Renshaw, Michael Rivett, Richard Greswell, Fernanda Aller, Veronique Durand With Steve Pedley & Eadaoin Joyce Robens Centre, Surrey University [email protected] [email protected]
Transcript
  • Are Viruses a Hazard in Waste Water Recharge of Urban Sandstone Aquifers?

    Hydrogeology Research GroupEarth Sciences

    School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences

    University of BirminghamUK

    John Tellam, Rae Mackay, Michael Riley, Joanna Renshaw, Michael Rivett,

    Richard Greswell, Fernanda Aller, Veronique Durand

    With

    Steve Pedley & Eadaoin Joyce

    Robens Centre, Surrey University

    [email protected]@bham.ac.uk

  • Aims

    To determine if viruses are a hazard for urban waste-water recharge programmes in urban sandstone aquifers

  • Why viruses?

    For most contaminants there is at least a certain amount of experience for predicting mobility

    Virusescomparatively little experience / data (worldwide)recent evidence suggests that may be an issue

  • The aquifer

    1cm2

    Permo-Triassic Sst sequence.

    UK’s second most used aquifer, and equivalent red-bed sequences used across EU and beyond.

  • 100μm

    100μm

    .

    1 mm

  • Thomas and Tellam (2006)

  • 0

    -200

    -100

    100

    m above sea level

    5 km

    Sandstone

    WestEast

    Mudstone

    Low permeability Carboniferous rocks

    Water level / pressure surface

  • Natural WLs

    • Gw velocity ~ 10-100 m/y

  • 0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    1850 1900 1950 2000Year

    Tota

    l abs

    trac

    tion

    (Ml/d

    )

    80

    90

    100

    110

    Wat

    er le

    vel (

    m

    abov

    e se

    a le

    vel)

    Knipe et al. (1993)

  • NiPCV = 20 μg/L

    01020304050

    0.3 1 3 10 32 100

    320

    1000

    3200

    Mor

    eNi (μg/L)

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    FrequencyCumulative %

    NO3PCV = 50 mg/L

    05

    1015202530

    10 30 50 70 90 110

    130

    150

    NO3 (mg/L)

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    FrequencyCumulative %

    TeCEPCV = 10 μg/L

    01020304050607080

    0.02 0.1 0.4 2 6 25 100

    400

    2000

    TeCE (μg/L)

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    FrequencyCumulative %

    ZnPCV = 5 mg/L

    0

    5

    10

    15

    200.3 1 3 10 32 10

    032

    010

    0032

    00Mo

    re

    Zn (μg/L)

    Freq

    uenc

    y

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100%

    FrequencyCumulative %

    Tellam (In press)

  • Human virus occurrence in UK urban sstaquifersEPSRC Study: Enteroviruses in Groundwaters

    Date Site Enterovirus

    (PFU/L) Rotavirus (PFU/L)

    Industrial Wells

    19/05/99 8 2

  • Site A Multilevel

    Depth of sample (mbgl)

    Coliphage PFU/L

    Enterovirus (cell culture)

    Enterovirus RT-PCR

    Rotavirus RT-PCR

    Norwalk like viurs RT-PCR

    Adenovirus PCR

    Astrovirus RT-PCR

    1 8.24

  • Experimental studies of virus survival

    Poliovirus

    Pla

    que

    form

    ing

    units

    /mL

    Week600

    100

    0

    Data from Jane Sellwood,

    Health Protection Agency

  • Last detection by PCR (weeks):

    Untreated Groundwater

    Treated Groundwater

    Ringers Solution

    Enterovirus 32 16 >104 Adenovirus 96 >104 >104 Norovirus Genogroup I

    84 100 >104

    Norovirus Genogroup II

    96 >104 >104

    Data from Jane Sellwood,

    Health Protection Agency

  • Experimental studies of virus mobilitylaboratory column expts

  • field

  • No virus recovered

    Joyce et al. (In press)

  • 0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    08/08/05 13/08/05 18/08/05 23/08/05 28/08/05 02/09/05 07/09/05 12/09/05 17/09/05 22/09/05

    PFU

    /ml

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    fluor

    esce

    in (P

    PB)

    MS2

    PhiX174PRD1

    H40/1

    fluo

    Joyce et al. (In press)

  • The SWITCH project WP3.2: approach, issues, design, and progressApproach

    can we use the aquifer’s attenuation capacity to make sure that viruses are not present in recovered waste water?

    Empirical investigation ….

  • The main issues to be addressed are:

    1. velocities and distances of travel of viable viruses under aquifer conditions

    2. effects of (pumping-induced) gw velocity changes

    3. effect of attachment on viability

  • Design and Progress• field monitoring

    – velocities and distances of travel under aquifer conditions

    • field experimentation– velocities and distances of travel under aquifer

    conditions– effects of pumping-induced gw velocity changes

    • laboratory experimentation– effects of pumping-induced velocity changes– effects of attachment on viability

    • modelling

  • modellingUsed in all other aspects of project:

    - planning expts- hydrogeological assessment of field systems- interpretation of field and lab data- extrapolation of results

    Will use flow modelsand possibly a colloid transport model developed in a project just ending

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    Time (s)

    C/C

    0

    colloids free viruses attached viruses total viruses non-reactive virus

  • field monitoring

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50(1) mbgl: metres below ground level(2) sampling intervals separated by bentonite seals (gray shade)(3) cfu/100mL: colony-forming units / 100mL

    sand

    ston

    em

    udst

    one

    8 12 20 401 2 3 1 2 3 4

  • Site A Multilevel

    Depth of sample (mbgl)

    Coliphage PFU/L

    Enterovirus (cell culture) (PFU/2mL)

    Enterovirus RT-PCR

    Rotavirus RT-PCR

    Norwalk like viurs RT-PCR

    Adenovirus PCR

    Astrovirus RT-PCR

    1 8.26

  • field monitoring: aims

    - to confirm previous finding that viable human viruses exist to at least 40 m depth

    - sample example piezometer system

    - to determine if there is seasonality, and therefore constrain velocity

    - sample piezometer monthly for 1.5 years

    - to determine the frequency of occurrence- sample wells

  • field experimentation (phage):aims

    - to determine the effect of residence time on virus attenuation

    - stopped flow push-pull testing

    - to determine the effect of velocity / velocity change on virus release

    - vary Q when pumping out

    - to determine the removal of virus with distance

    - undertake 20 m test

  • progress

    - pumped intervals previously used for injection ~ 1 year earlier- no phage detected- inactivated, or transported away??

  • - developed a preliminary flow model of the site

  • laboratory experimentation

    may 2005

    G

    PV

    D DetectorV Solenoid valveP Flow pumpG Pressure gaugeT Tracer (virus/colloid/dye)S Solvent (water)Tm Temp’ monitor

    Data/control

    T S

    D

    Tm

    Temperature controlled enclosure

  • laboratory experimentation: aims- to determine the effect of attachment on the viability of subsequently detached viruses

    - stopped-flow expts

    - to determine effect of flow velocity on mobility

    - use several flow rates

    ……. if time permits

  • Integrationcan we use the aquifer’s attenuation capacity to make sure

    that viruses are not present in recovered waste water?

    Empirical investigation ….

    1. velocities and distances of travel of viable viruses under aquifer conditions

    2. effects of (pumping-induced) gw velocity changes

    3. effect of attachment on viability

    • Hazard?• Rules to reduce risk

    modelling

  • Integration

    Monitoring

    - distance travelled

    - velocity in aquifer system

    - min pathway frequency

    Lab Expts

    - f(time)

    - f(velocity)

    Field Expts

    - f(time)

    f(velocity)

    f(distance)

    dependence on source characteristics

    Hazard?

    Rules to reduce risk

    modelling

    Are Viruses a Hazard in Waste Water Recharge of Urban Sandstone Aquifers? AimsWhy viruses?Human virus occurrence in UK �urban sst aquifers Experimental studies of virus survival Experimental studies of virus mobility fieldThe SWITCH project WP3.2: approach, issues, design, and progressDesign and ProgressmodellingIntegrationIntegration


Recommended