+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: barth
View: 34 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Chapter Twelve. Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness . Chapter Twelve Objectives. Explain the rationale and importance of message research. Describe the various research techniques used to measure consumer’s recognition and recall of advertising messages. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
62
Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness Chapter Twelve
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Assessing Ad Message

Effectiveness

Chapter Twelve

Page 2: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

2

Chapter Twelve Objectives• Explain the rationale and importance of

message research.• Describe the various research techniques

used to measure consumer’s recognition and recall of advertising messages.

• Illustrate measures of physiological arousal to advertisements.

Page 3: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

3

Chapter Twelve Objectives• Explicate the role of persuasion

measurement, including pre- and post- testing of consumer preference.

• Explain the meaning and operation of single-source measures of advertising effectiveness.

• Examine some key conclusions regarding television advertising effectiveness.

Page 4: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

4

Overview of Advertising Research

• More than 80% of advertisers and agencies pretest television commercials before airing them on a national basis.

It’s not easy or inexpensivebut the value outweighs the drawbacks.

Page 5: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

5

What Does Advertising Research Involve?

• To test effectiveness of messages• Pretesting ads during developmental stages• Posttesting to determine if messages achieve

their established objectives

Media Effectiveness (covered later)

Message Research

Page 6: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

6

Four Stages At Which Ad Message Research Might Be Conducted

1. Copy development stage2. “Rough” stage3. Final production stage4. After the ad has been run in the media

Page 7: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

7

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 1: provide measurements that are relevant to the advertising objectives

Principle 2: requires agreement about how the results will be used in advance of each specific test

Principle 3: provides multiple measurements because single measurements are generally inadequate

PACT Principles

Page 8: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

8

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 4: based on a model of human response to communications

Reception of a stimulus

Comprehension of the stimulus

The response of the stimulus

Principle 5: allows for consideration of whether the advertising stimulus should be exposed more than once

PACT Principles

Page 9: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

9

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 6: recognizes that a more finished piece of copy can be evaluated more soundly

Alternative executions be tested in the same degree of finish

Principle 7: system provides controls to avoid the bias normally found in the exposure context

PACT Principles

Page 10: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

10

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 8: takes into account basic considerations of sample definition

Requires that the sample be representative of the target audience

Principle 9: can demonstrate reliability and validity

A reliable test is one that yields consistent results

A valid test is one that is predictive of the marketplace performance

PACT Principles

Page 11: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

11

What Can Be Learned from Message Research?

• Message research is needed to diagnose an advertisement’s prospective equity-enhancing and sales-expanding potential.

• The ARF assessed which of 35 measures best predicts the sales effectiveness of television commercials. The only definitive conclusion of their study is that no one measure is universally appropriate or best.

Page 12: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

12

Message Research Methods

Qualitative Message Research

Quantitative Message Research

Page 13: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

13

Quantitative Message Research

Measurement

Understanding

Control

Improvement

Page 14: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

14

Illustrative Message Research Methods

Page 15: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

15

Advertising Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

MessageResearchMethods

Page 16: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

16

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• Starch readership service (magazines)

• Bruzzone tests (TV)• Burke day-after recall

(TV)

Page 17: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

17

Starch Readership Service

Measures the primary objective of a magazine ad—to be seen and read

Examines reader awareness of ads in consumer magazines and business publications

Readers are classified

Page 18: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

18

Starch Readership Service

Classifications

Noted—remember having previously seen the ad in the issue being studied

Associated—noted the ad and saw or read some part of it that clearly

indicated the name of the brand or advertiser

Page 19: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

19

Starch Readership Service

Classifications

Read Some—read any part of the ad’s copy

Read Most—read half or more of the written material in the ad

Page 20: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

20

Starch Readership Service

Indices are developed

ADNORM index: compares an advertisement’s scores against other ads in the same product category as well as the same size (e.g., full page) and color classifications (e.g., four-color ads)

Page 21: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

21

Measures of Recognition &

Recall

• 39% of people noted the ad,

• 37% associated it,

• 27% read some of it, and

• 10% read most of the body copy contained in the ad.

Page 22: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

22

Measures of Recognition &

Recall • 58% of people noted the

ad, • 54% associated it, • 39% read some of it, and • 39% read most of the body

copy contained in the ad.

Page 23: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

23

Starch Readership Service • Kia Sorento ad

Adnorm index scores • 72 (noted) • 74 (associated) • 73 (read some) • 59 (read most) • The ad performed

28% worse than the average noted score for similar ads.

• Jose Cuervo Especial Tequila ad

• 107 (noted) • 108 (associated) • 105 (read some) • 229 (read most) • The ad performed

slightly above average noted score for similar ads.

Page 24: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

24

Bruzzone Tests

Bruzzone test provides advertisers with a test of consumer recognition of television commercials. Anything identifying the brand is removed, to test whether viewers remember the name of the advertiser.

Page 25: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

25

Measures of Recognition & Recall

Advertising Response Model (ARM) links responses to the 27 descriptive adjectives to consumers’ attitudes toward both the ad and the advertised brand and to purchase interest.

Bruzzone test

Page 26: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

26

ARM for the “Thanking the Troops” Commercial

Page 27: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

27

Measures of Recognition & Recall

Provides valid prediction of actual marketplace performance along with being relatively inexpensive

Doesn’t provide a before-the-fact indication

Tests offer important info for evaluating a commercial’s effectiveness and whether it should continue to run

Tests are performed online

Bruzzone test

Page 28: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

28

Measures of Recognition & Recall

• Used to assess the effectiveness of test commercials and to ID strengths and weaknesses

(1) Claimed-recall scores—indicate the percentage of respondents who recall seeing the ad

(2) Related-recall scores—indicate the percentage of respondents who accurately describe specific advertising elements

Burke Day-After Recall Testing

Page 29: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

29

Measures of Recognition & Recall

Coke execs reject recall as a valid measure

1) Recall simply measures whether an ad is received but not whether the message is accepted

2) Recall is biased in favor of younger consumers

Burke Day-After Recall Testing

Page 30: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

30

Measures of Recognition & Recall

3) Recall scores generated by ads are not predictive of sales performance

4) Day-after recall testing is biased against certain types of advertising content

Understate the memorability of commercials that employ emotional or feeling-oriented themes and are biased in favor of rational or thought-oriented commercials

Burke Day-After Recall Testing

Page 31: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

31

Day-After Recall Vs. Masked-Recognition Research Findings

Page 32: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

32

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• Psychogalvanometer• Pupilometer

Page 33: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

33

Measures of Recognition & Recall

• Ads that are better liked are more likely to be remembered and to persuade

• Efforts are now made to measure consumer’s affective and emotional reactions to ads

Measures of Physiological Arousal

Page 34: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

34

Measures of Recognition & Recall

• Galvanometer—measures minute levels of perspiration in response to emotional arousal

• Pupillometric tests—measure pupil dilation

• Advertising researchers use changes in physiological functions to indicate the actual, unbiased amount of arousal resulting from ads.

Measures of Physiological Arousal

Page 35: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

35

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• Ipsos-ASI Next*TV method

• Rsc’s ARS Persuasion method

Page 36: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

36

Measures of Persuasion

Used when an advertiser’s objective is to influence

consumers’ attitudes toward and preference for the advertised

brand.

Page 37: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

37

Measures of Persuasion

• Performs ad research in more than 50 countries

• Tests television commercials in consumers’ homes

• Tells consumers to evaluate a TV program, but actually evaluating the commercials within the program

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 38: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

38

Measures of Persuasion

• One day after viewing—personal contact with sampled consumers and measure their reactions to the TV program and the advertisements

• Measures message recall and persuasion

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 39: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

39

Measures of Persuasion

• Persuasion measured by:

Consumers’ attitudes toward advertised brands

Shift in brand preferences

Brand-related purchase intent and frequency

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 40: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

40

Measures of Persuasion

1) Tests in a natural environment

2) Assesses the ability of TV commercials to break through the clutter

3) Determines how well tested commercials are remembered after this delay period

4) Allows the use of a representative national sampling

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 41: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

41

Measures of Persuasion

1) Respondents indicate what brands they prefer to receive among a “basket” of options—the pre measure.

2) After exposure to a television program respondents again indicate what brands they would prefer to receive if their name were selected in a drawing—the post measure.

The ARS Persuasion Method--rsc

ARS Persuasion Score = Post % for target brand –Pre % for target brand

Page 42: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

42

Measures of Persuasion

The ARS Persuasion score simply represents the post-measure percentage of respondents preferring the target brand minus the pre-measure percentage who prefer that brand

A positive score indicates a shifted preference toward the target brand

A higher-scoring commercial generates greater sales volume and larger market share gains

The ARS Persuasion Method--rsc

Page 43: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

43

Measures of Persuasion

ARS Persuasion scores are valid predictors of in-market performance

The higher the score, the greater the likelihood that a tested commercial will produce positive sales gains when the focal brand is advertised under real-world, in-market conditions

The ARS Persuasion Method--rsc

Page 44: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

44

Predictive Validity of ARS Persuasion Scores

Page 45: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

45

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• AC Nielsen’s SCANTRACK

• IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 46: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

46

Measures of Sales Response

Single-Source Systems

Gather purchase data from panels ofhouseholds using: (1) electronic television meters (2) optical laser scanning of universal

product codes (UPC) at retail checkout (3) split-cable technology

Page 47: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

47

Measures of Sales Response

SCANTRACK collects purchase data by having panel households use handheld scanners

Panelists record purchases of every bar-coded product purchased regardless of the store where purchased

Nielsen’s SCANTRACK

Page 48: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

48

Measures of Sales Response

Use handheld scanners to enter:

Any coupons used

Record all store deals

Record in-store features that influenced their purchasing decisions

Nielsen’s SCANTRACK

Page 49: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

49

Measures of Sales Response

IRI knows what items each household purchases by linking up optically scanned purchases with ID numbers

Members provide IRI with detailed demographic information

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 50: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

50

Measures of Sales Response

Single source data consists of:

(1) household demographic info

(2) household purchase behavior

(3) household exposure to new television commercials that are tested under real world test conditions

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 51: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

51

Measures of Sales Response

Uses optically scanned purchase data to know exactly which commercial each household had the opportunity to see and how much of a brand is purchased

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 52: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

52

Measures of Sales Response

Two types of tests are offered: (1) weight tests and (2) copy tests

1) Weight tests—panel households are divided into test and control groups

2) Copy tests—holds the amount of weight constant but varies commercial content

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 53: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

53

Conclusions by rsc

• Ad copy must be distinctive• Ad weight without persuasiveness is

insufficient• The selling power of advertising wears

out over time• Advertising works quickly if it works at

all

Page 54: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

54

Conclusion 1: All Commercials Are Not Created Equal: Ad Copy Must

Be Distinctive • Commercials having strong selling

propositions are distinctive and tend to achieve higher ARS Persuasion scores.

• Commercials for new brands tend to be most persuasive, but commercials for established brands can be made persuasive via brand differentiation.

Page 55: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

55

Illustration Of a

Commercial With a Strong

Selling Proposition

Page 56: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

56

Evidence from Frito-Lay’s Copy Tests

Page 57: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

57

Conclusion 2—More is Not Necessarily Better: Weight Is Not

Enough • Ad weight means the number of gross

rating points (GRP) that support an advertising campaign.

• An ineffective ad (not distinctive or persuasive) has no likelihood of increasing sales even if the ad weight is doubled or tripled.

Page 58: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

58

Relations Among Advertising Weight, Persuasion Scores, and Sales.

Page 59: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

59

The Role of Sales-Effective Advertising for an Undisclosed Campbell Soup Brand

Page 60: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

60

The Relationship Between Media Weight and Creative Content

47 commercials for established brands were tested and classified as:

1. Rational information 2. Heuristic appeals 3. Affectively based cues Finding: increased advertising weight led to

significant sales increases in sales only for commercials using affective cues.

Page 61: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

61

Conclusion 3—All Good Things Must End: Advertising Eventually

Wears Out • Advertising ultimately wears out and must

be refreshed to maintain or increase brand sales.

• Familiar brands have been shown to wear out more slowly than unfamiliar brands.

Page 62: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

62

Conclusion 4—Don’t Be Stubborn: Advertising Works Quickly or Not at

All• Some advertisers tend to “hang in there”

and wait for an ad to increase sales.• Most of the sales impact occurs in the first

three months of a new ad. • “Sunk costs” are an issue to consider, but

if an ad is not working at first, it probably never will.


Recommended