+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing future environmental, livelihood & poverty ... · Assessing future environmental,...

Assessing future environmental, livelihood & poverty ... · Assessing future environmental,...

Date post: 22-May-2018
Category:
Upload: hadiep
View: 222 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
54
Assessing future environmental, livelihood & poverty changes in coastal Bangladesh: an integrated framework Social Simulation of Fisheries and Coastal Management Manchester Metropolitan University 6-7 June 2016 Attila Lazar ([email protected] ) University of Southampton on behalf of the ESPA Deltas consortium http://www.espadelta.net/
Transcript

Assessing future environmental, livelihood & poverty changes

in coastal Bangladesh: an integrated framework

Social Simulation of Fisheries and Coastal ManagementManchester Metropolitan University

6-7 June 2016

Attila Lazar ([email protected])University of Southampton

on behalf of the ESPA Deltas consortium

http://www.espadelta.net/

The ESPA Deltas consortium

• University of Southampton - Robert Nicholls PI

• University of Oxford• Exeter University • Dundee University • Hadley Centre MET office • Plymouth Marine

Laboratories National Oceanography Centre Liverpool

• Jadavpur University• IIT Kanpur

• Institute of Water and Flood Management, Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology

• Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies • Institute of Livelihood Studies • Ashroy Foundation• Institute of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease

Research, Bangladesh • Center for Environmental and Geographic Information

Services • Bangladesh Agricultural University• Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute • Technological Assistance for Rural Advancement • International Union for Conservation of Nature • University of Dhaka• Water Resources Planning Organization

UK (7) Bangladesh (12) India (2)

3

• Why Deltas

• Introduce ESPA Deltas

• Introduce ΔDIEM

• Some plausible futures of coastal Bangladesh

Outline

Home to over half a billion (>7%) people (occupy only1% of the world’s land)

Economic hotspots with significant EcosystemServices (fertile land, agriculture, fisheries, aquaculture,forest products, flood/surge protection)

Upstream human actions reduce water (>40%) andsediment supply (~26%): subsidence, loss ofwetlands, accelerated erosion, salinization.

Sea level rise increases salinity & accelerates landloss

Tropical storms & cyclones cause devastatingflooding

High population density, intensive land use andpotential for future mass migration.

Deltas are Hotspots

4

Population potentially displaced by current sea level trends to 2050

Source: IPCC AR4 using data in Ericson et al. (2006)

Threatened Deltas

6

Science questions from policy makersGeneral Economic Division, Planning Comission, Bangladesh

Sealevel rise?

(… cm/100y)

More /extreme

storms?More/intense

rainfall?

Spatial

developments

Subsidence?

More summer

Drought?

Salt

Intrusion?

Decreased

river

Discharge?

Increased

river

Discharge?

Increased

Erosion?

And assessment of the potential Impact of these drivers on ecosystemservices (agriculture, fisheries, forestry, fresh drinking water),

infrastructure, disaster preparedness, and rural livelihoods.

ESPA Deltas (2012-16): Overarching aim

To provide policy makers with the knowledge and tools to enable them to evaluate the effects of policy

decisions on ecosystem services and people's livelihoods

Vision: Link science to policy at the landscape scale

Key Questions

• What are the key drivers of change?

• How will these change with time and how do they interact?

• What are the consequences of these changes for ecosystem services?

• How will these affect the people, particularly the poor?

• How can policy processes use this science?

Bay of

Bengal

9

Study area and project elements

Exogenous drivers(upstream flow diversion, ocean circulation, climate change, macro-economics, …)

off-shore fisheries

fisheries

Sundarbans

agriculture

aquaculture

char land

Endogenous drivers(Bangladeshi policies, laws, subsidies, flood management, subsidence, …)

Live

liho

od

& la

nd

use

demography incl. migration

security (financial,

environmental)

markets

livelihood & poverty

10

ESPA Deltas: Components

Bay Bengal:GCOMS

ClimateHadRM3/PRECIS

Upstream Basin:INCA MODFLOW HydroTrend

Delta PlainFVCOM,Delft3DMODFLOW

AgricultureCROPWAT

Coastal FisheriesSize- & Species-based models

Temp, rainfall PE, etc.Sea level, SLP, SST, winds

Water, sediment, nutrients, salinity

water, salinity, sediment Mangrove

Quantitative Biophysical Models

MorphologyLand Cover Land Use

Aquaculture

Surg

e le

vel

Primary productivity, T,S,O2, currents

Soil salinity

flooding

Economic analysis & modelling

Socio-Economic Data Collection & Analysis

Quantitative household survey (consumption, assets, employment, migration, health, poverty, …)

Statistical Associative model(land use, environment, socio-

economy, census)

Population projections

Qualitative household survey(ES vs. livelihoods)

Laws, policies:Gaps, Conflicts, Implementation efficiencies

Stakeholder engagement: Key issues, Scenario development, Iterative learning

Governance Analysis & Stakeholder Engagement

Know

ledge inte

gra

tion (Δ

DIE

M)

Scenario d

evelo

pm

ent &

quantification

Delta Dynamic Integrated Emulator Model (ΔDIEM)

11

• A modelling tool to formally synthesise results AND

aid analysis and planning in coastal Bangladesh.

• Designed to test a range of future scenarios and quantify interdependencies of: • the bio-physical environment and ecosystem services;

• rural livelihoods, poverty & health;

• associated governance.

• PC-based metamodel• fully coupled

• harmonises scales & method

• fast run-time

• includes feedbacks

• operates at the (653) Union level AND

daily/weekly/monthly/yearly time step.

12

Stakeholder

User

ESPA Deltas Team

Planned Interventions & Governance

Bussiness as Usual

More Sustainable

Less Sustainable

Global Climate/Demographic/Economic system

Delta Hydrology

Bay of Bengal

Integrator

Fisheries&

AquacultureAgriculture

Mangrove

System startup

Human Wellbeing changes and responses

Household Health, Food & Income

Emulators

Governance Socio-EconomicPhysical & Ecological

nursery

spwaning areas

Floods protection

system

Historical dataHH Survey DataHousehold

Participant

Issues, scenarios,interventions

50+ agencies

1586 surveyed households

~100 specialists &

students

BUET

Organisation

ΔDIEM conceptual model

Inputs

Climate-precipitation-temperature-evaporation

Bay of Bengal-mean sea level-(subsidence)

Economy-market price-cost of farm inputs-wages

Levees/Polders-location-height-drainage rate

Demography-life expectancy-fertility rate-migration rate

Hydrology-discharge-sediment

Ecosystem Services-agriculture-aquaculture-fisheries-mangroves

Governance-subsidies-land use planning-infrastructure planning

-cyclone-storm surge

Hazards

Outputs

• fish catches• net earnings from

- farming, - aquaculture & - fishing

Livelihoods

• river salinity• groundwater salinity• union-wise soil salinity • crop productivity

Salinisation

I. Household outputs: a) Bayesian statistical module:

• asset-based relative poverty indicator

b) Process-based module:• economics (income, costs/expenses,

savings/assets)

• relative wealth-level• calories / protein intake / BMI• monetary poverty indicators

Household Wellbeing, Poverty & Health

• water elevation • inundated area

Coastal hydrology

II. Regional economic outputs • sectoral output (tons, BDT)• GINI• GDP/capita• income tax revenue• household debt level

Verification:

• programming bugs

• ΔDIEM emulator vs. high fidelity simulator outputs

Validation:

• ΔDIEM outputs vs. other datasets (spatially / temporally)

Verification / Validation

Bio-physical environment emulation is based on high fidelity models

• Climate (MetOffice Hadley Centre)

• Hydrology (INCA, Delft-3D, FVCOM, ModFlow-SeaWat)

• Bay of Bengal (POLCOMS-GCOMS, fisheries species model)

• Mangrove (SLAMM, Markov chain & cellular automata model)

Novel integration approaches

• emulation methodology

• regional soil salinity component

• extended FAO CROPWAT model(with salinity, temperature, CO2, aquaculture)

Verification / Validation

Soil salinity conceptual model

FVCOM results (Q0-BAU, year 2000) ΔDIEM emulation (Q0-BAU, year 2000)

Emulated river salinity (ppt) matches well the FVCOM results

𝑤𝑖 = 1 − 𝑑𝑖𝑟

2

Verification / Validation

Labsa (Satkhira)

Observations:IWM Annual Research Report (BARI 2009-2014)

Simulated soil salinity (dS/m) reproduces observed seasonality & magnitude

Verification / Validation

The novel process-based household module builds on

• primary data (ESPA Deltas household survey: qual. & quant.)

• secondary data (BBS, HIES)

• expert knowledge

Key features:

• Coupled with bio-physical changes

Verification / Validation

• 37 household archetypes (based on

seasonality of livelihoods)

• economic decisions (i.e. coping strategies including loans)

• poverty/health indicator outputs

Observation (HIES)Simulation (min/mean/max)

Household food expenditure (BDT/month) follows sparse observations, but shows large annual fluctuations pre-2020.

Q0-BAU

Verification / Validation

HIES (rural, 2000-2010), World Bank (national, 2013-14)Simulation (min/mean/max)

Income inequality (GINI, %

population) matches rural observations, but not national.

Verification / Validation

The novel geo-spatial (statistical) asset poverty module built on

• CENSUS, and other socio-economic indicators

• Land cover and land use maps

• Soil salinity, flooding indicators

Inputs:Land coverLand useSoil salinityWaterloggingAccess to marketEmployment rateChildren in schoolLiteracy rate

Amoako Johnson et al. Sustain Sci (2016) 11:423–439

Output:Asset poverty index:The likelihood for being in the poorest poverty quintal

BD Health Survey 2011

Census 2011 ΔDIEM (year 2011)

Simulated (relative) asset poverty indicator captures observed spatial variability

Verification / Validation

Amoako Johnson et al. Sustain Sci (2016) 11:423–439

Stakeholder Engagement

An ongoing process from the beginning

of the project:

• Issue Identification

• Scenario development

• Policy exploration

Participatory Modelling

the Iterative Learning Loop

Long iteration route that involves seeking advice from a broader team

v

26

Stakeholder

Integrator

ESPA Deltas Team

Shorter iteration, running ΔDIEM with different inputs, SSPs,…

Users

Participatory Modelling

the Iterative Learning Loop

Relevant management/policy questions for ΔDIEM analysis

today future

• renegotiated Farakka treaty

• changing polder heights

• land zoning policies

• new potential crops

• farming subsidies

• guaranteed crop prices

• fishing regulations

• groundwater use policies

• new loan types

28

ESPA Deltas’ scenario frameworkSR

ES A

1B

(RC

P 6

.0 -

8.5

)

By

20

50

Development Scenarios

Less Sustainable(LS)

Business As Usual(BAU)

More Sustainable(MS)

moderately warmer& wetter

(Q0)

warmer& wetter, but variable

(Q8)

much warmer& drier

(Q16)

Sea Level scenariosMean sea level rise (compared to 2000)

2050 2099

Q0 +0.25 m +0.73 m

Q8 +0.21 m +0.58 m

Q16 +0.23 m +0.56 m

Subsidence (2000 to 2100): 0.3 m

Kay et al 2015. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2015, 17, 1311

Q16 might be the ‘worst’ climate – higher temperature &decreasing rainfall

Climate scenarios

2100 2100

5 – much below normal

4 – below normal

3 – near normal

2 – above normal

1 – much above normal

Getting wetter Getting dryerVery variable

An

nu

al m

ean

Dry

sea

son

• The number of days with low flows and high flows seem to gradually increase in most scenarios

• More extremes and large inter-annual valriabilityare likely

River flow scenariosDrought / Flood indices

32

Fishery scenariosBay of Bengal total catches and values

• Current rates of catches are not sustainable.

Fernandez et al 2015. ICES Journal of Marine Science; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsv217

33

Demography scenarios

• Population is expected to decrease even under the MS scenario

Szabo et al 2015. ESRC Centre for Population Change; Working Paper 61; March 2015; ISSN 2042-4116

Economic scenariosPercentage change in ΔDIEM Economic Input Variables by 2030No further change after 2030

Economic input variable LS BAU MSCost of agriculture (seed, pesticide, fertiliser types) 0 10 20Cost of aquaculture (feed, post larvae, fishling) 20 10 0Cost to keep livestock/poultry, fishing, Forest collection 0 10 20Land rent cost (farming) 0 10 20Cost to do Services & Manufacturing business 20 0 -20Market (selling) price of agriculture crops 0 10 20Market (selling) price of fish 30 10 20Market (selling) price of aquaculture crops (shrimp) 0 10 20Income from forest goods (honey, fruits, timber, etc) -20 -10 0Income from Manufacturing, Services and Livestock/Poultry 65 110 165Remittances (BDT/month) 20 30 40Household expenses 0 10 20Daily wage (without food) (BDT/day) 0 10 30Cost of diesel (BDT/gallon) 0 10 20Employment rate (% population) 0 10 30Literacy rate (% population) 2 4 8Children in school (% population) 2 5 10Travel time to major cities -10 -30 -50USD/BDT exchange rate & PPP exchange rate 0 0 0 H

un

t, A

. 201

5. E

SPA

Del

tas:

Eco

no

mic

Po

licy

Dim

ensi

on

s. P

roje

ct R

epo

rt

35

Composite indicatorsNormalised to the minimum/maximum range.

Farming & fishing income:

• weighted average income from farming and fishing

Welfare:

• process-based poverty index

• statistical asset poverty likelihood

Food security:

• calorie intake,

• protein intake

• BMI

GINI:

• Income inequality in union

36

Composite indicatorsNormalised to the minimum/maximum range.

Drought:

• number of day below 20 percentile total inflow

• number of days with no precipitation (March-June)

• Australian drought watch index (March-June)

Flood:

• Number of days above 90 percentile total inflow

• Number of days with >25cm inundation depth

Soil salinity:

• Area averaged soil salinity (March-June)

37

Socio-Economy vs. Provisioning Ecosystem Services

• Q16LS: moderate improvement in poverty and food security, but collapse of rural income and enhanced off-farm sectors. Inequality gently rising after 2025.

• Q0MS: enhanced agriculture, fisheries and off-farm (diversity), large improvement in poverty and food security, but ES income slightly decline after 2025. Inequality gently improving after 2025.

1 – increase0 – decrease

38

Hazards vs. Provisioning Ecosystem Services

• Q16LS: drought with collapse of income and less flooding.

• Q0MS: increase in flood and water availability with rise in income.

• High inter-annual variability for many indicators.

1 – increase0 – decrease

Relative asset poverty index in 2050The likelihood for being poor

- very likely

- very unlikely

• Decline in relative poverty around the Sunderbans

• Stubborn (relative) poverty in the East connected to transport and access.

Q16LS

Q8BAU

Q0MS

40

Relative asset poverty index Key factors controlling poverty

Amoako Johnson et al. Sustain Sci (2016) 11:423–439

41

Dominance of livelihoods (Q0BAU)

• Importance of business and manufacturing incomes increases.

• Small farm owners and fishers rely less on Ecosystem Services.

42

Mean calorie Intake in 2050 (kcal/cap/day)

• Calorie intake, protein intake and BMI are mainly affected by the socio-economic scenarios.

• Magnitude depends on governance

Q16LS

Q8BAU

Q0MS

Crop yield in 2050 (fraction)Mean of all crops throughout the year

• Higher yield and more salt tolerant crops perform better.

• Crop variety depends on the development scenario.

- potential yield

- no yield

Q16LS

Q8BAU

Q0MS

Farming income in 2050 (BDT/month)

Q16LS

Q8BAU

Q0MS

• Most farmers are poor• Better varieties improve livelihood,

not enough for a step change in wellbeing

Intervention examples

• Increased Ganges baseflow

• Agriculture subsidies

46

Intervention: increased dry season flowDaily river salinity (ppt)

Riv

er s

alin

ity

(pp

t)

Q0MSQ8BAUQ16LS

Dry season Dry season Dry season Dry season

47

Intervention: better price for grains (rice, wheat, maize)Relative wealth of farmers in 2050

baseline after intervention

Q0MSQ0MS

Q16LS Q16LS

- least poor

- poorest

Key Conclusions

•Key Findings of relevance to policy

• Future is substantially impacted by policy interventions –more so than climate impacts (until 2050)

• Strong signal of off-farm economics exists within all scenarios

• Diversity of livelihoods is significant with substantial benefits from access to diverse range of economic inputs (agriculture, aquiculture, off farm)

• These are early findings based on the current data, models and assumptions. This needs to be owned and further developed in Bangladesh. This is the beginning of the process.

ESPA Deltas Legacy(Post-December 2016)

• Data at BUET, WARPO and the ESPA Deltas web sites

• Downloadable ΔDIEM from BUET and ESPA Deltas web sites

• Trained and experienced staff at BUET

• Journal papers (27+ journals published to date, with many more to come)

• Newsletters and Policy Briefs

• Established interest and collaboration with the Dutch-funded Delta Plan 2100 project and with the General Economic Division of the Planning Commission in Bangladesh.

DECCMA project (2014-18)

(DEltas, Vulnerability and Climate Change: Migration and Adaptation)

Overarching aims:

1. to assess migration as an adaptation option in deltaic environments under a changing climate;

2. to deliver policy support on sustainable gender-sensitive adaptation in deltaic areas.

http://www.geodata.soton.ac.uk/deccma/

DECCMA objectives

1. to understand the governance mechanisms that promote or hinder

migration of men and women in deltas;

2. to identify climate change impact hotspots in deltas where vulnerability

will grow and adaptation will be needed;

3. to understand the conditions that promote migration and its outcomes, as well as gender-specific adaptation options for trapped

populations, via surveys;

4. to understand how climate-change-driven global and national macro-economic processes impact on migration of men and women in deltas;

5. to produce an integrated systems-based bio-physical and socio-economic

model to investigate potential future migration under climate change;

6. to conceptualise and evaluate migration within a wide suite of

potential adaptation options at both the household and delta level;

7. to identify feasible and desirable adaptation options (planned and autonomous) and support implementation of stakeholder-led gender-

sensitive adaptation policy choices.

DECCMA Study sites

DECCMA integration

Key features:

• Spatial / temporal scenarios

• Adaptation (household/individual level) including migration

• ‘Evaluation’ of success considering gender -> research tem & stakeholder views

Using different modelling techniques:

1. Bayesian Belief Network modelling

2. Meta modelling: building on the ΔDIEM framework but with an adaptive agent-based social model

Lazar et al 2015, A method to assess migration and adaptation in deltas: A preliminary fast track assessment, DECCMA Working Paper

Social Simulation of Fisheries and Coastal ManagementManchester Metropolitan University

6-7 June 2016

Assessing future environmental, livelihood & poverty changes

in coastal Bangladesh: an integrated framework

Attila Lazar ([email protected])University of Southampton

on behalf of the ESPA Deltas consortium

http://www.espadelta.net/


Recommended