+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards

Date post: 22-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: roana
View: 50 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Assessing Geological Hazards. Geohazards ?. 4 of 30. Geohazards are events caused by geological features and processes that present severe threats to humans, property and the natural and built environment. . . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
84
Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30 . to develop a methodology to incorporate ge into the land use planning process Geohazards are events caused by geological features and processes that present severe threats to humans, property and the natural and built environment. Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Di Geohazards?
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Geohazards are events caused by geological features and processes that present severe threats to humans, property and the natural and built environment.

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Geohazards?

Page 2: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

• coastal flooding and riverine flooding• coastal erosion• land sinking – sinkholes• contamination of water from heavy metals

in soil or acid rock drainage• landslides / slope failure

Geo-events that pose threats

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Page 3: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

How do we realistically handle these geohazards in our MCCAPs?

Geo-events that pose threats

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Page 4: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 5: Assessing Geological Hazards

2 climate drivers

1.Sea level rise

2.Changes in precipitation

Page 6: Assessing Geological Hazards

BIO’s relative sea level rise estimates

0.4-0.9m on 50-year time scale

0.9-1.6 on 100-year time scale

Page 7: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 8: Assessing Geological Hazards

Example from

County of Colchester / Truro

Page 9: Assessing Geological Hazards

MSC’sSTORM SURGE MODEL

Tell us the impacts you are seeing and at what water levels!

Model based on OUTPUT WINDS

Page 10: Assessing Geological Hazards

MSC’sSTORM SURGE MODEL

Map display; every hour for 48 hrs out from when model run

Time series graph; point forecast for specific location. Show stage 1, 2 or 3 flooding based on past events.

Page 11: Assessing Geological Hazards

MSC’sSTORM SURGE MODEL

Does NOT include wave run up

Add 10% to surge levelsif wind facing shoreline . . .

. . . then add tide level

Page 12: Assessing Geological Hazards

MSC’sSTORM SURGE MODEL

65cm surge predicted at nearly high tide = 2.9m

75-80 cm surge experienced = so 3m + at least another 10cm for wave run up

(more if wind from S/SE)

Page 13: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 14: Assessing Geological Hazards

Observed sea level rise exceeded what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted by 50% for the period 1990–2006.

80% of the rise in sea level between during 2003–2008 is believed to be from ice melt

Page 15: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 16: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 17: Assessing Geological Hazards

0.42 ± 0.15 0.57m upper uncertainty for relative SLR

So use 0.57m

Page 18: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 19: Assessing Geological Hazards

Water Surplus

Water Deficit

Intensity Short Period Rainfall

Page 20: Assessing Geological Hazards

In a 20 year return period rainfall:

• 5% more rain by 2020s

• 9% more by 2050s

• 16% more by 2080s

Page 21: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 22: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 23: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 24: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 25: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 26: Assessing Geological Hazards

Anne [email protected] 431 7168

www.elementalsustainability.ca

Page 27: Assessing Geological Hazards

Geohazards?

1. What’s the short-list of geohazards potentially relevant to my MCCAP?

2. How are they relevant, and are they priorities?

THANK YOU!• Garth DeMont, Geoscientist with NS Department of Natural Resources• Gavin Kennedy, Hydrogeologist with NS Department of Natural Resources• John Drage, Hydrogeologist with NS Department of Natural Resources

Page 28: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

• coastal flooding & riverine flooding• coastal erosion• land sinking – sinkholes• contamination of water from heavy

metals in soil or acid rock drainage• landslides / slope failure

Geo-events that pose threats

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Page 29: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 30: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Geohazard—Coastal erosion

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

The need to establish setbacks should be informed by geology – both bedrock and surficial

Coastal erosion risk will increase with sea level rise.

Page 31: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Geohazard—Karst

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Occurs inlimestone & gypsum

• sinkholes• water contamination

Under the Nova Scotia Treatment Standard for Municipal Surface Source Water Treatment Facilities, once designated, karst areas are subject to water treatment standards.

Page 32: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Geohazard—Heavy Metals

Toenails, Tap Water and You: The Arsenic ConnectionNS DNR Report of Activities: 2009

Page 33: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30Geohazard—Heavy Metals

Toenails, Tap Water and You: The Arsenic ConnectionNS DNR Report of Activities: 2009

In unstable climatic conditions where rocks and soilsare saturated one week and dry the next there is ahigher risk of transport into groundwater systems.

Will that be our climate?

Page 34: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30Geohazard—Acid rock drainage

Pyrite and pyrrhotite oxidize when exposed to air, resulting in production of sulphuric acid and iron oxides.

Sulphuric acid is soluble.

Picture from NASA Earth Science Division

Page 35: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30Geohazard—Acid rock drainage

The amount of water that will fall in a ‘20 year return period’ rainfall (i.e., an event that has a 5% chance of happening any given year) will be:

5% more rain fall by the 2020s9% more rain will fall by 2050s

16% more rain fall by the 2080s.

Picture from NASA Earth Science Division

Page 36: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards 4 of 30

Picture from NS DNR Geological Services Division

Geohazard—Slope stability

• Slope angle?• What’s beneath our feet? On surface and underlying?• How saturated is it?• How warm is it?

different kind of assessment than coastal erosion Slope Stability Guidelines for Development Applications

Page 37: Assessing Geological Hazards

Decision Flow Diagram

Page 38: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing Geological Hazards

•Understand how climate change can trigger certain hazards

•Are any of these hazards present in my jurisdiction?

•Where?

•Do they impose an intolerable risk?

•How urgent is the need to respond?

Page 39: Assessing Geological Hazards

Anne [email protected] 431 7168

www.elementalsustainability.ca

Page 40: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Page 41: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Page 42: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Update the Draft Stormwater Management Plan

Recommend BMPs so that future development won’t increase peak runoff flows

Page 43: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Update the Draft Stormwater Management Plan

Recommend BMPs so that future development won’t increase peak runoff flows

Assess the effects of climate change on rainfall intensity and the effects of these changes on the storm water mgt plan

Page 44: Assessing Geological Hazards

SWMM5

Stormnet

Page 45: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

New climate-wise design rainfalls

Stormnet

Page 46: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Page 47: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

What’s the rainfall pattern during the day: sub-day durations? (used for IDF curves)

Page 48: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Conclusions:

•Predicted magnitude of the increase in precip volume expected in 1 day is 29%

•Predicted increases for 24 hr rain are higher than increases in annual rainfall

•Predicted increases for shorter durations are greater than increases for longer

durations

Page 49: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

StormnetDesign Storms

Page 50: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Page 51: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

•redefine peak flows to be associated with

potential future rainfall events

•estimate the equivalent pipe diameter of culverts required to convey the peak flows, and

•estimate the costs for culvert replacements to accommodate peak flows

Page 52: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Minor Drainage System

Page 53: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Designed for rainfall events with return periods of1 in 5 to 1 in 10 , based on HISTORICAL RECORD.

Page 54: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Designed for rainfall events with return periods of1 in 5 to 1 in 10 , based on HISTORICAL RECORD.

Rainfall events in exceeding this cause surcharge:Up-the-pipe-flooding

Page 55: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Major Drainage System

Natural water channels tend to have capacity for a 1 in 2 year rainfall event, based on historical records

Page 56: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Major Drainage System

The level of service expected by the public and other stakeholders is rising

Page 57: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Recommendation:

All structures with capacity less than the estimatedmaximum peak runoff flows predicted by the

(stormnet) modeling should be upgraded.

Page 58: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Major Drainage System

4 Recommendations:

1. Examine each watershed in the Town, starting with the watershed where the potential risk of flood damage is greatest, and figure out:

• if and where there are opportunities to increase the capacity for water storage/detention and

• if existing culverts and structures could withstand a 1 in 100 year return period rainfall as defined by simulated rainfall events modeled in the study.

Page 59: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Major Drainage System

4 Recommendations:

2. Identify flood limits generated by the design rainfall event with 1 in 100 year return period on Town Land Use Mapping

Page 60: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Major Drainage System

4 Recommendations:

3. DEFINE acceptable level of (stormwater mgt) service in consultation with stakeholders

Page 61: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

Major Drainage System

4 Recommendations:

4. Develop a prioritized list of modifications to existing structures (e.g. culverts), based on what they now knew about the condition and capacity of existing culverts, as well as stakeholder views on acceptable levels of flood risk

Page 62: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process Plan to adopt the

updated Plan at the Jan. 2013 Council mtg

Page 63: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process A stormwater mgt

plan will have to be submitted as part of all development applications

Page 64: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing changes in precipitation

. . . to develop a methodology to incorporate geology into the land use planning process

Take away messages:

•Work at the watershed level

•Engage climatologists to model and downscale design rainfalls

•Ask about the modeling software

•Visually present flood hazard and risk to stakeholders

Page 65: Assessing Geological Hazards

When does an impact become a priority?

Page 66: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 67: Assessing Geological Hazards

Adaptive capacity is the ‘action’ component, the dynamic ability to respond and adapt in the face of change.

Adaptive capacity refers to the combination of assets and resources that form the base from which adaptation actions and investments can be made.

. . . adaptive capacity considers processes and response. Aspects such as flexibility, redundancy, experience, and networks of support can all be key factors for developing adaptive capacity.

Page 68: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 69: Assessing Geological Hazards

High Urgency = understand impact and develop appropriate response within 3 yrs

Med. Urgency = initiation of action within 3-10 yrs

Low Urgency = action can wait 10 years, as there’s lots of capacity to ‘absorb’ impact

Page 70: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 71: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 72: Assessing Geological Hazards

We can’t determine disaster risks with climate and exposure data alone… we also need to consider social vulnerability.

Vulnerability:the predisposition of aperson or group to beadversely affected

Exposure:the people, places or infrastructure that are affected

Climate Trends:the frequency and severity of the weather eventor climate trend

Page 73: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing adaptive capacity

CommunityCharacterizations

100 Measures

10 themes

1. Health2. Education3. Demographics4. Sense of

community5. Governance6. Safety and

preparedness

7. Infrastructure8. Local economy9. Macro economy, 10. technology

Page 74: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing adaptive capacity

Core measures

•Well-established and widely used

•The data is measurable and readily available (or could be collected through a community survey), and

•Meaningful in the context of the theme area and community climate adaptation

Page 75: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing adaptive capacity

Study Limitations

• some indicators can’t be quantified

• qualitative information may not provide clear conclusions

• some qualities of adaptive capacity don’t have indicators

• there aren’t agreed on parameters indicating strong adaptive capacity

• What’s an appropriate reference?

• Research focuses on historical response

Page 76: Assessing Geological Hazards
Page 77: Assessing Geological Hazards

Assessing adaptive capacity

Hosting a conversation about socio-ec factors in the context of climate projections can add breadth to adaptation strategy, and help you identify and capitalize on actions that can benefit the community no matter how the future climate unfolds.

So what will help us host that conversation?

Page 78: Assessing Geological Hazards

Anne [email protected] 431 7168

www.elementalsustainability.ca

Page 79: Assessing Geological Hazards

Closing

Page 80: Assessing Geological Hazards

However good our future research may be,

we shall never be able to escape from the

ultimate dilemma that all our knowledge is

about the past,

and all our decisions are about the future.

Ian Wilson, 1975

Page 81: Assessing Geological Hazards

Order / ControlThe place for management

Chaos / OrderThe place for leadership

Art of Hosting

Page 82: Assessing Geological Hazards

Chaos / OrderThe place for leadership

1. What critical uncertainties face the organization?

2. What major strategic decisions do you have to make?

3. What do you need to know about the future in order to make these decisions?

Page 83: Assessing Geological Hazards

http://climatechange.gov.ns.ca/content/impactsWorkshop

Page 84: Assessing Geological Hazards

Anne [email protected] 431 7168

www.elementalsustainability.ca


Recommended