+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING...

ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING...

Date post: 11-May-2018
Category:
Upload: tranquynh
View: 215 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
24
1 ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS IN VIETNAM IN TERMS OF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCES Dr. Nguyen Dai Minh PhD PEng Deputy-General Director, Vietnam Institute for Building Sciences & Technology (IBST) GEM-SEA Workshop on Seismic Vulnerability of Buildings Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 1 st July 2013
Transcript

1

ASSESSMENT AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING RC

BUILDINGS IN VIETNAM IN TERMS OF EARTHQUAKE

RESISTANCES

Dr. Nguyen Dai Minh PhD PEng Deputy-General Director, Vietnam Institute for Building

Sciences & Technology (IBST)

GEM-SEA Workshop on Seismic Vulnerability of Buildings Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

1st July 2013

2

1. Seismicity in Vietnam

- Vietnam Seismic Zone map (500 year RP) shows that in the country

the earthquake intensity of VI-VII in MSK-64 scale will generally

possibly happen. There is only in the North-West part of Vietnam

seismic intensity up to VIII in MSK-64 scale.

- From 1900-2006, the historical records show 115 earthquakes with

M=4-4.9, 17 earthquakes with M= 5-5.9 and 2 earthquakes with M>6.

- Previously, there were no records of earthquakes with M>4 in the

South of Vietnam but in 2005 earthquake with M>4 rocked tall buildings

in Vung Tau and HCM city.

- In 2012, there were a series of reservoir induced earthquakes in Song

Tranh hydro power plant, the Middle part of Vietnam, causing the

worries to local people and government.

3

Seismic design:

- From 1954 - 1976: Most buildings were low-rise and not designed

considering the seismic resistance.

- From 1976 - 1986: There were widely used the prefabricated RC

buildings based on the East-German and the former USSR standards

in Hanoi and Nghe An. These buildings were designed to resist the

earthquakes with intensity of VII - VIII (MSK-64 scale).

- From 1986 - 1997: Many buildings and structures were not designed

considering seismic loads. However, key-important government

structures and some buildings as requested by the investors were

designed considering the earthquake loading. The applied codes were

the Russian SNiP II -7-81* and UBC:1991.

2. Earthquake resistance of existing buildings

in Vietnam – general remarks

4

- From 1997 until now: Many buildings (since 2006, most buildings)

were designed considering the earthquake with intensity VII. The

applied codes were SNiP II-7-81*, UBC:1997 and TCXDVN 375 : 2006.

Seismic resistance of buildings:

- All most old residential buildings and houses are very poor in terms of

seismic resistances.

- Most high-rise buildings constructed in recent 5 years were designed

taking into account the earthquake loading either based on SNiP II-7-

81*, UBC 1997 or TCXDVN 375: 2006. However, through the

investigations conducted in Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh city, Vung Tau and Dien

Bien Phu in 2009 – 2010, it was found that the seismic detailing were

not strictly followed.

5

Comments:

(1) On the codes and regulations: There have been the regulations for

the buildings regarding to earthquake resistances. Seismic zoning

maps including the earthquake intensities (MSK-64 scale), PGA values

etc. have been issued for design and constructions.

(2) High-rise buildings and structures built since 2000 up to now

generally have been designed considering the earthquakes, and based

on one of the: TCXDVN 375:2006, SNiP II-7-81* and UBC: 1997.

6

(3) Residential buildings, especially the prefabricated RC structures,

having the below signs, will possibly be collapsed if earthquakes with

I=VII-VIII occurred:

- Large-prefabricated RC panel buildings with the connections joints

significantly damaged or fully damaged;

- Buildings that have the additional loadings such as the water tanks on

roofs, extending the rooms in the apartments, adding stories etc. but

not calculated and designed regarding to the seismic loads;

- Buildings where the walls were removed or columns were cut-off to

create the larger space for shopping or other commercial services;

- Buildings classified by D class according to TCXDVN 373 : 2006

“Specifications for evaluations of the dangerous of the building

structures”.

7

(4) Normal houses with following signs will be dangerous if earthquakes

with I = VII-VIII happen:

- Settlement with inclination > 1 %;

- Very thin buildings;

- Very old masonry buildings with footing and brick walls significantly

deteriorated;

- Brick buildings with the walls or columns having the vertical cracks

with crack widths > 2mm and crack lengths > 1/2 the height of the story.

8

Recommendations:

(1) For buildings (prefabricated buildings) that are evaluated in D –

class based on TCXDVN 373 : 2006, recommend to demolish and to

replace with new buildings;

(2) Enhance regulations and code system, prepare technical guidelines

in terms of seismic resistance construction;

(3) Propagate to people to be aware of the construction to follow the

regulations; publish, spread and teaching the construction methods

regarding to earthquake resistances; guide people the actions needed

for human safety, evacuate and rescue when earthquakes occur;

9

(4) Teaching in universities and training for engineers and architects the

seismic analysis and detailing;

(5) Continue to update the seismic data; develop, adopt and transfer

the effective earthquake resistance technologies in Vietnam.

10

3. Causes for damages or collapses

of existing buildings by earthquakes

(1) Irregularities in plan of the buildings: The large difference between

the mass center and the rigidity center in plan shall cause the torsional

effect when earthquakes occur.

(2) Irregularities along the height of the buildings: The very in-uniform

arrangement of the lateral stiffness and mass along the height of the

buildings shall lead to local damages at the locations where the

stiffness or mass changed.

(3) The unsuitable changes of the existing structures: Changes or

upgrading such as making the floor holes, columns removed, increase

the stories, wall removed or adding the separating walls in the upper

floor etc. => soft story or basements.

11

(4) The construction errors: Columns are not in vertical, the

eccentricities between beams and columns, large errors in

construction materials (properties), foundation problems (very soft

foundations, foundations that are easily in liquidations) etc.

(5) Big difference between the old applied codes and the present

effective codes: the safety of buildings is even critical under the

normal loading and becoming more critical under the seismic

loading combinations.

12

(6) Construct or install the structure components or equipments (such

as water tanks, mobile phone antennas …): possibly cause the main

structure damages when earthquake occurs.

(7) Influence of the structure modeling and the calculation data input:

Because of the complicated geological conditions or the difficulties of

the structural modeling due to the architecture (like transferring slab

with many stories above in high-rise structures), the earthquake

analysis may not be accurate.

(8) Progressive collapse: the vertical seismic loads influence to the

structure because of removing of the columns in the basement or

lower stories of the buildings for car parks or shopping areas or office

for rents etc.

13

(9) Brittle or very low-ductile structures: most old masonry or concrete

structures (without reinforcement) are belonged to this type. These

structures are dangerous in terms of earthquake resistances.

(10) Influences of the adjacent buildings: Due to the adjacent buildings

mostly do not ensure the seismic joints, and easily collide each other

during vibrations caused by earthquakes.

(11) Poor quality of the construction joints.

14

Procedure (based on EN 1998-3:2005):

- Determination of the seismic risk at the site (PGA etc.).

- Building and site investigations.

- Assessments.

- Select the intervention solutions.

4. Guidelines for assessment and

retrofitting of existing RC buildings regarding

to earthquake resistances

15

Tcl - the remain life service of the existing structure = Tds – the age of

the building

kgh – parameter depending on the applied limit state (recom. kgh =1 )

IgRg aa

3

1

50

clgh

I

Tk

Determination of PGA value:

agR - referenced peak ground acceleration

I - importance factor, determined by the following formula:

16

Investigations:

- Investigations on the life and imprortance class as well as the

present functions of the buildings

- Foundations and footings investigations

- Structure investigations

- Evaluations of the knowledge levels of the existing structures

Knowledge level (KL): KL1, KL2 and KL3

Confidence factor CF

KL CF

KL1 1,35

KL2 1,20

KL3 1,00

17

Assessments:

Determine the ground type based on TCXDVN 375:2006.

Structure modelling analysis: based on the information collected to

model structures in which the mean values of the material properties

shall be used in the analysis.

Earthquake loading and seismic load combinations: following

TCXDVN 375:2006.

Methods of analysis: Linear methods, non-linear method and q-

factor method.

Safety check: dd RE

Conclusions of structure assessments.

18

Structure retrofitting/interventions:

a) Local or overall modification of damaged or undamaged elements

considering strength, stiffness and ductility of these elements;

b) Adding new structural elements (bracing, brick in fill, RC columns

and even shear wall etc.);

c) Modification of the structural system (elemination of some structural

joints, widening of joints; modification to more regular and more

ductile structures etc. );

d) Addition of new structural system to take some or all of the entire

seismic loads;

e) Change the existing non-structural elements to be structural

elements;

19

f) Introduction of passive protection devices through either dissipative

or base isolation;

g) Mass reduction;

h) Restriction or change of use of the building;

i) Partial demolition;

j) Intervention into the footing and foundations if the foundation is not

uniform (eg.: building on both pilling and shalow foundations);

k) Combinations of the above methods.

20

5. Cases of studies

Rach Mieu res. building

- designed in 1985, located in Phu

Nhuan district, HCM city

- 1 basement + 16 storeys

- Present situations: there are not

found any damages.

Comments:

- The structure used RC frames-shear walls; regular in plane but irregular

along the height;

- Pile footing; ground type C; FS2;

- Importance factor I = 1,0;

- The building has not shown the defects on materials;

- Detailing following TCXDVN 375:2006 was not applied;

- The structure can sustain the earthquake in HCM city (PGA = 0.08g).

21

Block D5, Giang Vo district, Hanoi

- 5 storeys and 2 blocks, prefabricated RC building

constructed during 1960-1970

- Existing situations: degrading, construction joints

are in corrosion, rebars corrosied and rusted

Comments:

- This is a prefabricated structures with longitudinal and crossing bearing walls, the

ductility is very low;

- The regularities in plan and along the height are not satisfied because of modifications,

extensions etc.;

- Ground type: D, using shallow foundations;

- KL1 - limited;

- Can not sustain the seismic loads (PGA = 0.1 g).

22

Building B3, Nghĩa Tân district, Hanoi

- 5 storeys, built in 1982;

- Present situation: degradtion.

Comments:

- Prefabricated structures with bearing walls systems;

- Construction joints rae very deteriorated;

- There were no records on the buildings (including the structures and

foundations). KL is very poor;

- Cannot sustain the earthquake with PGA=0.1g.

23

THAT ARE THE INFORMATION ON THE ASSESSMENT

AND RETROFITTING OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS IN

VIETNAM REGARDING TO EARTHQUAKE

RESISTANCES.

Thank you very much for your attentions!

24

Thank you very much !


Recommended