+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessment of Health and Nutritional Status

Assessment of Health and Nutritional Status

Date post: 29-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: bella
View: 85 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Assessment of Health and Nutritional Status. Dr. Premananda Bharati Professor & Head Indian Statistical Institute 203, B.T. Road, Kolkata 700 108 West Bengal, India E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]. What is health?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
45
Assessment of Health and Nutritional Status Dr. Premananda Bharati Professor & Head Indian Statistical Institute 203, B.T. Road, Kolkata 700 108 West Bengal, India E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Assessment of Health and Nutritional Status

Dr. Premananda BharatiProfessor & Head

Indian Statistical Institute203, B.T. Road, Kolkata 700 108

West Bengal, IndiaE-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

Page 2: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

What is health?

WHO (1971) defined “health” as “a complete physical, mental and social well being and not merely an absence of disease or infirmity”.

Page 3: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Nutrition What is nutrition? Nutrition is the process in which we consume food or

nourishing liquids, digest and absorb them and use them for health and growth.

What is nutrients? Nutrients are chemical elements and compounds found

in the environment that plants and animals need to grow and survive.

What are the different types of nutrient? (i) Energy-producing nutrients (also called energy-

yielding nutrients or macronutrients) like carbohydrates, fat and protein.

(ii) Micronutrients often refer to vitamins and minerals.

Page 4: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

What is energy (calorie)?

1) Calorie is an energy measurement unit.

2) One calorie of heat energy is required to raise one gram of water by one degree Celsius.

3) 1,000 calories equal 1 kilocalorie (kcal), which is commonly used in measuring food energy.

4) Estimation of energy requirements for healthy individuals takes account of age, gender, body weight and activity patterns..

What is protein?

1) Proten is mainly used for growth and body repair.

2) When there is an insufficient intake of energy, protein would be broken down and used as body fuel, which may lead to protein-energy malnutrition.

3) One gram of protein provides 4 kcal.

Page 5: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

What is carbohydrate?1) Carbohydrate is the major energy source in an average

diet, which is also the preferred fuel. 2) One gram of carbohydrate provides 4 kcal. 3) When adequate carbohydrate is provided in the diet,

protein would be spared for growth and repair. 4) Carbohydrate can be divided into three main types:

monosaccharides, disaccharides and complex carbohydrate (starches and dietary fibres).

What is fat?1) Fat is technically known as triglycerides, which is a

class of lipids. 2) Fat is a concentrated energy source, which provides 9

kcal for each gram of fat. 3) Fat carries fat-soluble vitamins (i.e. vitamin A,D,E and

K). 4) Fat prevents heat loss in extreme temperatures and

protects organs against shock.

Page 6: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

5) Fat can be divided into saturated fat and unsaturated fat depending on their chemical structures.

6) Unsaturated fat can be further divided to mono- and poly-unsaturated fats.

7) Excess fat intake has been linked to major health problems, including an increased risk of heart disease, obesity, hypertension, diabetes and certain types of cancers.

Page 7: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Direct Indicators:-- Nutritional Anthropometry-- Clinical Assessment -- Bio-chemical Estimations

INDICATORS OF HEALTH AND NUTRITIONAL STATUS

Indirect Indicators:-- -- Dietary assessment -- Vital Statistics

In addition, Secondary Data: -- Socio-economic -- Socio-demographic -- Environmental

Page 8: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

MEASUREMENTS - Using Anthropometric Instruments

REFERENCE VALUES / STANDARDS - National, International

INDICES - Computed; Age dependent / Independent

CLASSIFICATIONS

- Grading of Nutritional Status

NUTRITIONAL ANTHROPOMETRY

Page 9: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS

Anthropometry, which measures the dimensions and composition of the human body.

-Weight (kgs)

-Height (cms)

- Mid Upper Arm Circumference (cms)

-Waist Circumference (cms)

-Hip Circumference (cms)

- Fat fold thickness (mms) : at Triceps, Biceps, Supra-Iliac, Sub-scapular

Page 10: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Nutritional Anthropometry

Weight : - Total Body mass - Simple, widely used - Sensitive to small changes in nutrition

Height : - Genetically Determined - Environmentally influenced - Stunting Reflects chronic undernutrition

MUAC : - Reflects muscle/fat - Easy to measure, used for quick screening - Independent of age (1-5 years)

FFT: - Measures body fat - Correlates well with total body fat

Page 11: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Standard equipment: - Accuracy / Consistency,

Appropriate techniques: - Training & Standardization

Correct assessment of age:Reference values:

- For comparison and computation of indices

Classification:

- For grading nutritional status

REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRITIONAL ANTHROPOMETRY

Page 12: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Reference Values

Anthropometric measurements obtained on statistically adequate number of individuals who are well nourished, living in an environment free from constraints of any sort and have capacity to reach maximum growth potential at each age group/Gender.

-- National Eg. ICMR, Well-to-do Hyderabad pre-school

children, IAP Standards

-- International Eg. NCHS, Harvard, MGRS, WHO, NHANES

Page 13: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

CURRENT REFERENCE VALUES

National Center for Health Statistics(NCHS) 0- 18 years / By gender. (Hamill et. al. AJCN, 1979 - WHO/1983)

HARVARD (0-60 months / Gender pooled) (Jelliffe et. al. WHO Mono. 53 - 1966)

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

(NHANES) 9-17 years/Gender Specific BMI Centiles. World Health Organization (1995)

WHO (0- 5 years and 5-18 years / By gender) (Official website of WHO, Child growth standards)

Page 14: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

ANTHROPOMETRIC INDICES

Weight for age

Height for age

Weight for Height

Body Mass Index

Page 15: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

NUTRITIONAL GRADING / CLASSIFICATIONS

Preschool Children:

GOMEZ CLASSIFICATION

WEIGHT FOR AGE (% of

NCHS Standards)NUTRITIONAL GRADE

90 Normal

75 – 89.9 Grade I (Mild Undernutrition)

60 – 74.9 Grade II (Moderate Undernutrition)

< 60 Grade III (Severe Undernutrition)

Page 16: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

GOMEZ CLASSIFICATION

Gomez et. al. (J Trop Ped 1956)

Based on Prognosis of children admitted to Hospitals in Mexico - Significantly higher incidence of mortality among children with <60% of standard wt for age

- Significantly higher morbidity among children with 60-75% of standard weight for age

Page 17: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

IAP CLASSIFICATION(Indian Academy of Paediatrics)

WEIGHT FOR AGE

(% of Harvard Standard)

NUTRITIONAL GRADE

80 Normal

70 – 89.9 Grade I (Mild Undernutrition)

60 – 69.9 Grade II (Moderate Undernutrition)

50 – 59.9 Grade III (Severe Undernutrition)

< 50 Grade IV (Severe Undernutrition)

Page 18: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

STANDARD NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

-3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0

34% 34%14% 14%

2% 2%

SD Score

( 2SD = 96 %)

Normal

“Measuring Changes in Nutritional Status” (WHO, Geneva 1983).

Page 19: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

STANDARD DEVIATION (SD) CLASSIFICATION

CUT-OFF LEVEL

NUTRITIONAL GRADE

WEIGHT FOR AGE

HEIGHT FOR AGE

WEIGHT FOR HEIGHT

Median – 2 SD Normal Normal Normal

Median – 3 SD to Median – 2 SD

Moderate Underweight

Moderate Stunting

Moderate

Wasting

< Median – 3 SDSevere

UnderweightSevere

StuntingSevere

Wasting

Page 20: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Nutritional gradation based on BMI (adult) Body Mass Index (BMI) = Weight in kg/ height in meter square

Nutritional gradation based on BMI (adult)

Classification Cut-off points (BMI = kg/m2)

CED grade III (Severe thinness) <16.00

CED grade II (Moderate thinness) 16.00-16.99

CED grade I (Mild thinness) 17.00-18.49

Normal 18.50-24.99

Overweight 25.00-29.99

Obese ≥ 30.00

Page 21: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Urgent need :

There is need to adopt the new WHO growth standards of 0-18 years Children by all.

The Growth charts in ICDS need to be modified using SD classification criteria.

The functionaries have to be trained and oriented to these changes.

The existing data need to be re-analysed using new reference values to enable comparisons.

There is urgent need to build new reference values (age, sex and population specific) for Indian children and adult.

Page 22: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Measuring calorie through diet survey Diet survey (i) One or seven days dietary survey is conducted in

each household. Each raw food item to be cooked for each meal is weighed in a Salter pan type balance prior to cooking. Household members not taking meal at home or guest(s) taking meal in the household are also recorded. Respondents are asked on the next day, whether any food had been left over or consumed by their livestock or shared with neighbour. If yes, the amounts are recorded. Approximate amounts (weight) of food items consumed by member(s) outside home during that day are also recorded.

(ii) 24 hours recall method is conducted in each member of the households through pre-tested structured questionnaire. For children specifically preschool, question should be asked to their mothers.

Page 23: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Nutrient consumption

(i) The nutritive values are estimated from the food composition tables like Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (Gopalan et al., 2007). Calorie need of an individual is taken as the basis of estimation of consumption unit. Besides age and sex of the household members, the physiological status like stage of pregnancy or lactation of the woman of in the household is also taken into consideration.

(ii) Consumption of calories, protein and fat are classified on the basis of Recommendatory Dietary Allowances (RDA) of India (ICMR, 2004).

Page 24: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Consumption unit of household by age and sex in India

Individual Age (years)

Calories according to ICMR recommended allowances

Consumption unit1

Male 60 2875 2875/2875= 1

Male 25 2875 2875/2875= 1

Male 12 2190 2190/2875= 0.76

Female 55 2225 2225/2875= 0.77

Female 21 2225 2225/2875= 0.77

Female 18 2060 2060/2875= 0.72

Female 11 1970 1970/2875 =0.68

1Total household consumption unit = 5.70

Page 25: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Energy Requirements of Boys and Girls at Different Age Groups: A Comparison Between FAO and ICMR Estimates

Boys Girls

Age groups Body weigh

t

Daily energy requirements Body weigh

t

Daily energy requirements

FAO ICMR FAO ICMR

Kg. Kcal/d/kg

Kcal/d

Kcal/d Kg. Kcal/d/kg Kcal/d Kcal/d

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

0-5 months 5.4 93 502 583 5.4 92 497 583

6-11 months 8.6 80 688 843 8.6 79 679 843

1-3 years 12.2 82 1000 1240 12.2 79 964 1240

4-6 years 19.0 75 1425 1690 19.0 72 1368 1690

7-9 years 26.9 69 1856 1950 26.9 64 1722 1950

10-12 years 35.4 62 2195 2190 31.5 55 1733 1970

13-15 years 47.8 56 2697 2450 46.7 47 2195 2060

16-17 years 57.1 51 2912 2640 49.9 44 2160 2060

Page 26: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Daily Energy Requirements for Men and Women in India

Age group Lifestyle Men Women

Mean weigh

t

BMR Daily energy requirements

Mean weigh

t

BMR Daily energy requirements

FAO ICMR FAO ICMR

Kg. Kcal/d/kg

Kcal/d

Kcal/d/kg

Kcal/d Kg. Kcal/d/kg

Kcal/d

Kcal/d/kg

Kcal/d

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12)

18-29.9 Sedentary 60 27 2479 41.3 - 50 25 1912 38.2 -

Moderate 60 2851 47.5 - 50 2200 44.0 -

Heavy 60 3645 60.7 - 50 2812 56.2 -

30-59.9 Sedentary 60 26 2387 39.8 - 50 25 1912 38.2 -

Moderate 60 2746 45.8 - 50 2200 44.0 -

Heavy 60 3510 58.5 - 50 2812 56.2 -

60 or more Sedentary 60 22 2020 33.7 - 50 22 1683 33.7 -

Moderate 60 2323 38.7 - 50 1912 38.2 -

Heavy 60 2970 49.5 - 50 2475 49.5 -

18 or more Sedentary 60 25.8 2367 39.4 2425 50 24.6 1882 37.6 1875

Moderate 60 2722 45.4 2875 50 2165 43.3 2225

Heavy 60 3480 58.0 3800 50 2768 55.4 2925

Page 27: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Health What is health?

I. WHO (1971) defined “health” as “a complete physical, mental and social well being and not merely an absence of disease or infirmity”.

II. The concept of health varies among different culture and geographical settings (Colson and Selby, 1974) and the cognition of the concept depends upon the value system of that particular society (Opler, 1963).

III. It is, therefore, important to measure health based on the facts relating to how it is defined (Mc Dowell et al., 2004)

Page 28: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Physical measure of health

a) Infant and child mortality

b) Nutritional status through anthropometric measurements:-

(a) children (b) adult

c) Haemoglobin status

d) Blood glucose status

e) Blood pressure

f) Morbidity pattern etc.

Page 29: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Nutritional status of preschool (0-60 months) and others children (5–19 years)

Three nutritional indices as weight for age z score (WAZ), height for age z score (HAZ), weight for height z score (WHZ) are calculated using World Health Organization (WHO) standard (WHO, 2006) for preschool children.

Similar indices are used along with Body Mass Index (BMI) percentile using National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) (Frisancho, 1990) and also World Health Organization (WHO, 2000) for children aged 5-19 years.

Z- Scores <-2 SD of the above indices are considered as underweight (WAZ), stunting (HAZ) and wasting (WHZ). <5th percentile of BMI was considered as undernutrition. All the indices were internationally recommended (WHO, 1995).

Page 30: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

How to calculate Z score Z-score is defined as the deviation of the value observed

for an individual from the median of the reference population, divided by the standard deviation (SD) of the reference population.

Z- score = (observed value) – (median of the reference population) SD of the reference population

LIKE Z- score = 8 kg in weight – 10 kg in weight 2 kg in weight = - 1 (normal)

Page 31: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Nutritional status among adult

(i) Body Mass Index (BMI) = Weight (kg)/ Height (m2)...…………... (James et al., 1988)

Nutritional gradation based on BMI (adult) The subjects are classified on the basis of chronic energy deficiency (CED) grades (James et al., 1988; WHO, 1995) as follows:

ClassificationCut-off points (BMI = kg/m2)

CED grade III (Severe thinness) <16.00

CED grade II (Moderate thinness) 16.00-16.99

CED grade I (Mild thinness) 17.00-18.49

Normal 18.50-24.99

Overweight 25.00-29.99

Obese ≥ 30.00

Page 32: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Anthropometric Classification BMI(kg/m2)

Principal cut-off points Additional cut-off points

Underweight <18.50 <18.50

     Severe thinness <16.00 <16.00

     Moderate thinness 16.00 - 16.99 16.00 - 16.99

     Mild thinness 17.00 - 18.49 17.00 - 18.49

Normal range 18.50 - 24.9918.50 - 22.99

23.00 - 24.99

Overweight ≥25.00 ≥25.00

     Pre-obese 25.00 - 29.9925.00 - 27.49

27.50 - 29.99

     Obese ≥30.00 ≥30.00

          Obese class I 30.00 - 34-9930.00 - 32.49

32.50 - 34.99

          Obese class II 35.00 - 39.9935.00 - 37.49

37.50 - 39.99

          Obese class III ≥40.00 ≥40.00

Source: Adapted from WHO, 1995, WHO, 2000 and WHO 2004

Page 33: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

General consequences of undernutrition

Increase in morbidity and mortality Constant weight loss, muscular

hypercatabolism Psychological disorder like long depressive

syndromes Immune deficiency Digestive disorder Food-drug interactions and toxicity Consequences of micronutrient deficiencies

Page 34: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

General consequences of overnutrition

Increase the risk of Atherosclerosis Increase risk of hypertension, diabetes,

stork, heart disease, and some form of cancer

High mortality rate Disturbance of endocrine function In females, it increases endometrial,

cervical, ovarian cancer

Page 35: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Haemoglobin

• Oxyhaemoglobin is estimated immediately after collection of blood samples using Sahli’s haemomter, following standard technique (WHO,

1968) Classification of haemoglobin (gm/dl) level (adult and adolescents)

The subjects were classified on the basis of different grades of haemoglobin (WHO, 1975) as follows:

Classification Cut-off points (gm/dl)

Male Female

Severe anaemia ≤ 7.00 ≤ 7.00

Moderate anaemia 7.01-10.00 7.01-10.00

Mild anaemia 10.01-12.99 10.01-11.99

Normal anaemia ≥13.00 ≥ 12.00

Haemoglobin level among adolescents is classified on the basis of international standard as normal (≥ 12.0 gm/dl) and anaemic (<12 gm/dl) (WHO, 1992).

Page 36: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Mean per capita consumption of calories, protein, and fats

Calories (kcl) Protein (gms) Fats (gms)

Year Round Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Urban

1983 38 2,240 2,070 63.5 58.1 27.1 37.1

1987–8 43 2,233 2,095 63.2 58.6 28.3 39.3

1993–4 50 2,153 2,073 60.3 57.7 31.1 41.9

1999–0 55 2,148 2,155 59.1 58.4 36.0 49.6

2000–1 56 2,083 2,027 56.8 55.3 34.6 46.1

2001–2 57 2,018 1,982 54.8 54.2 33.6 46.1

2002(2) 58 2,025 2,014 55.4 54.9 34.7 47.0

2003 59 2,106 2,020 58.0 55.5 36.4 46.7

2004(1) 60 2,087 2,036 56.9 55.9 35.5 46.8

2004–5 61 2,047 2,021 55.8 55.4 35.4 47.4

Source: Authors’ calculations from NSS data. Nutrients are calculated, following the NSS practice, by multiplying reported quantities (purchased, grown, or received outside the market) by a set of nutrient conversion factors which are themselves revised from time to time.

(Deaton and Drèze, 2008)

Page 37: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Rural per capita calorie consumption, 1983 to 2004-5

(Deaton and Drèze, 2008)

Page 38: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Urban per capita fat consumption, 1983 to 2004-5

(Deaton and Drèze, 2008)

Page 39: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

State Rural Urban

Calories per day

Percentage of norm (2400)

Calories per day

Percentage of norm (2400)

Andhra Pradesh 2424 101 2457 117

Assam 2258 94 1481 71

Bihar 2252 94 2605 124

Gujarat 2197 92 2069 99

Haryana 2311 96 1526 73

Himachal Pradesh 2714 113 2277 108

Karnataka 2304 96 2682 128

Kerala 1456 61 2004 95

Madhya Pradesh 2584 108 2360 112

Maharashtra 2326 97 2451 117

Orissa 2507 104 2720 130

Punjab 2266 94 2183 104

Rajasthan 3016 126 2561 122

Tamil Nadu 2215 92 2050 98

Uttar Pradesh 2266 94 2027 97

West Bengal 2633 110 2089 99

Potential calorie intake of poverty-line class in different states in India

(Sen, 2005)

Page 40: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

State and zone wise percentage distribution of different types of nutritional status among the under six children of India by sex

Zones and States Boys Girls

N

Under weight

SeverelyAnemic

Under weight and

severely anemic N

Under weight

Severelyanemic

Under weight and

severelyanemic

North –East 4254 24.8 12.5 2.9 3957 15.7 12.2 2.0

Arunachal Pradesh 956 29.6 12.2 3.3 904 14.7 10.8 2.2

Assam 1152 27.4 12.4 2.8 1046 23.7 11.6 2.9

Manipur 1002 17.7 10.8 2.1 915 8.6 12.8 0.9

Meghalaya 87 41.4 9.2 2.3 83 39.8 14.5 3.6

Mizoram 311 22.2 9.3 1.9 336 9.8 6.5 0.9

Nagaland 195 17.4 5.6 1.0 178 18.5 6.2 1.1

Sikkim 375 20.8 22.1 4.8 315 10.2 22.2 2.5

Tripura 176 36.4 19.3 5.1 180 16.7 18.3 2.2

East 20993 51.1 19.8 11.3 20010 50.9 20.9 11.7

Bihar 8751 54.0 21.6 13.1 8127 55.5 24.1 15.3

Jharkhand 3635 55.5 18.8 12.3 3383 54.1 18.3 10.8

Orissa 5559 46.9 21.4 10.5 5648 45.0 21.4 9.9

West Bengal 3048 45.2 12.9 6.4 2852 45.6 13.7 6.5

Central 31656 57.9 20.1 13.0 29326 55.3 20.7 12.9

Madhya Pradesh 10482 58.2 17.4 10.7 9719 56.2 17.2 10.3

Chattisgarh 2845 50.5 25.2 13.5 2816 47.2 25.2 13.0

Uttar Pradesh 18329 59.5 20.9 14.2 16791 56.1 22.0 14.3

Page 41: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

West 12109 51.0 31.4 16.9 10939 51.1 31.0 16.7

Goa 167 34.1 7.2 4.2 162 34.0 8.6 3.7

Gujarat 4804 51.0 36.4 20.1 4179 50.7 36.3 19.6

Daman & Diu 266 44.0 28.9 14.7 258 41.5 30.2 11.2

Dadra & Nagar Haveli 262 51.1 50.4 26.7 255 47.8 49.0 25.9

Maharashtra 6610 51.7 27.8 14.6 6085 52.4 27.3 14.9

North 22899 47.8 20.1 10.8 19365 42.8 20.7 10.3

Haryana 5629 37.8 24.2 10.2 4501 31.9 25.3 9.1

Himachal Pradesh 1288 40.0 16.5 7.9 1146 34.6 16.6 5.8

Jammu 767 22.4 3.4 0.4 738 20.7 4.6 0.9

Delhi 1244 35.5 17.8 6.8 1089 35.4 20.1 7.7

Punjab 3687 41.8 23.8 11.2 2939 36.2 22.9 10.0

Rajasthan 8330 59.5 19.1 12.8 7148 56.5 20.3 13.4

Chandigarh 58 44.8 29.3 15.5 72 26.4 29.2 6.9

Uttaranchal 1896 62.0 15.6 11.4 1732 45.6 16.0 9.5

South 12294 42.4 18.0 8.2 11719 37.2 17.9 7.4

Andhra Pradesh 2647 45.6 22.4 11.0 2469 38.0 22.0 9.7

Karnataka 2727 48.2 21.1 10.7 2609 43.8 19.3 9.7

Kerala 752 37.9 2.9 1.3 714 34.9 2.7 1.1

Tamil Nadu 5420 39.0 16.9 6.8 5209 34.3 17.7 6.3

Pondichery 478 39.2 14.4 5.6 718 33.6 14.8 5.6

Islands 421 33.3 18.0 2.9 425 28.2 10.4 3.5

Andaman & Nicobar 360 33.6 10.3 3.1 365 25.2 10.1 3.0

Lakshadwip 62 31.1 11.5 1.6 60 46.7 11.7 6.7

India 104626 50.3 20.8 11.6 95741 47.4 21.2 11.4

Page 42: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

State and zone wise percentages of rural and urban CED and their differences and ranking

Percentages of Malnourished (BMI <18.50)

Rural UrbanRural and urban

difference Ranking of differences

North-east 22.5 17.3 5.20 1

Arunachal Pradesh 10.2 12.6

-2.40 2

Assam 28.1 18.4 9.70 10

Manipur 17.6 18.2 -0.60 3

Meghalaya 25.3 18.2 7.10 7.5

Mizoram 27.9 15.6 12.30 15

Nagaland 18.5 13.1 5.40 6

Sikkim 10.6 13.3 -2.70 1

Tripura 36.5 25.1 11.40 13.5

East 43.8 27.2 16.6 4

Bihar 39.0 31.4 7.60 9

Orissa 48.8 32.9 15.90 18

West Bengal 48.9 22.8 26.10 26

Central 38.1 25.5 12.6 2

Madhya Pradesh 38.4 27.0 11.40 13.5

Uttar Pradesh 37.8 23.3 14.50 17

West 44.8 22.5 22.30 6

Goa 29.6 22.5 7.10 7.5

Page 43: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Gujarat 46.7 22.7 24.00 24

Maharashtra 48.2 22.4 25.80 25

North 31.3 15.7 15.60 3

Haryana 30.4 13.4 17.00 21

Himachal Pradesh 30.2 16.7

13.50 16

Jammu 29.5 12.8 16.70 19

New Delhi 13.2 12.1 1.10 4

Punjab 20.3 9.10 11.20 12

Rajasthan 37.6 27.1 10.50 11

South 36.8 18.8 18.00 5

Andhra Pradesh 42.4 19.8 22.60 22

Karnataka 46.1 23.3 22.80 23

Kerala 19.5 14.4 5.10 5

Tamil Nadu 33.7 16.8 16.90 20

 India 36.0 20.4 15.6(Bharati et al., 2008)

Page 44: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Conclusion Economic condition

Nutrient consumption

Health and Nutritional status

Inequalities

Health condition

However, this inter-relationship is varied population-wise along with their residential status.

(Ompad et al., 2007)

Page 45: Assessment of  Health and Nutritional Status

Recommended