1
(c) Schargel Consulting
At-Risk Learners CANBecome Successful Graduates
National Quality in Education Conferencewww.schargel.com/ [email protected]
(c) Schargel Consulting
The Wealth of Nations• Centuries Wealth Determinate• 14 & 15th The nation with the most gold• 16 & 17th The nation with the most colonies• 18 & 19th The nation with the greatest industrial
production• 20th The nation with the greatest military• 21st The nation with the best schools
2
(c) Schargel Consulting
EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGES AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURY
• Schools need to be globally competitive• Raise academic achievement of students• Lower dropout rate• Narrow achievement gap• Increase school success
(c) Schargel Consulting
NCLB & “HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS”
Recent studies offer compelling evidence that teachers are one of the most critical factors in how well students achieve. Effective teachers helped students greatly outperform those who had ineffective teachers. In a Tennessee study, students with highly effective teachers for three years in a row scored 50 percentage points higher on a test of math skills than those whose teachers were ineffective.
3
(c) Schargel Consulting
Every school day 181 school buses loaded with children
leave school never to return. That is the number of students
who drop out EVERY
SCHOOL DAY
(c) Schargel Consulting
We are no longer dealing exclusively with
TRADITIONAL STUDENTSwho come from TRADITIONAL
FAMILIES.
4
(c) Schargel Consulting
Traditional Students• Come from stable environments.• Come from two-parent nuclear family.• Speak English as the primary language.• Have a stay-at-home mom.• Have parents who actively support education
and teachers.• Have homes focused on learning and
education.• See education as a “way up” in society.
(c) Schargel Consulting
TRADITIONAL EDUCATIONAL REMEDIES
• Fix the parts of education• Fix the teachers• Fix the students• Fix the parents• Fix the schools• Fix the media• FIX THE BLAME!
5
(c) Schargel Consulting
IMPROVE THE PROCESS
Schools are improving. However they are not improving
systemically, measurably or as quickly as society and the
workplace needs the improvement.
(c) Schargel Consulting
IMPROVE THE PROCESS
HOW CAN YOU IMPROVE THE RESULTS UNLESS YOU
CHANGE THE PROCESS THAT PRODUCED THEM?
6
(c) Schargel Consulting
Educational Reform must focus on:
• Learning and teaching.• Must be systemic• Cannot be episodic.• Must focus on causes, not symptoms.
(c) Schargel Consulting
The Educational System “Stool”
Students Schools
Communities Parents
Accoun tabilityAssessm
ent
Managem
entSystem
s
In two dimensional thinking, this may appear stable; however, in reality…
7
(c) Schargel Consulting
The Educational System “Stool”
Students Schools
Communities Parents
Accoun tabilityAssessm
ent
Cla s sr oomPe rfo r m
a nc e
Managem
entSystem
s
We need threelegs to supporta 3-D stool…
©Franklin Schargel, 2005
(c) Schargel Consulting
LOOK AT THE VIDEO
• What challenges did we face that you don’t?
• What did we do differently than what you do?
8
(c) Schargel Consulting
SCATTER DIAGRAMTest grades/Homework done
Test
Grades
# of Homeworks Completed
100
90
80
70
60
50
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
. …. . . . .
. … .
. . … .
… . . . . ….
(c) Schargel Consulting
SCATTER DIAGRAMTest grades/Days Absent
Test
Grades
# of Days Absent
100
90
80
70
60
50
6 5 4 3 2 1 0
. … .. . . . . .
… .. . … .
… . . . . ….
9
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE
• WITH STUDENTS– The dropout rate fell from 21.9% to 2.1%.– Classroom cutting reduced 39.9%– Post-secondary school attendance increased to
72.1%.– Big Brother, Big Sister Apprentice Training Program– Increased student involvement (peer tutoring, senior
citizens, extra curricula activities
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE
• WITH PARENTS– Membership in PTA increased 1440% in 9
months.– For the first time in the 71 year history of
the school parents ran for PTA offices.– Family Night was started.– The PTA set their own agenda for their
meetings.
10
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE
• WITH STAFF– Union grievances fell from 29 to 2.– Interdepartmental meetings were held.– Monthly staff recognition and reward.– The Quality Steering Committee was
established as the change mechanism within the school.
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT WE WERE ABLE TO ACHIEVE
• WITH OUR EXTERNAL CUSTOMERS– Business partnerships– The school received over $5 Million in grants.– Continuous Improvement Scholarships.– Post-secondary school alliances.– Widespread media recognition
11
(c) Schargel Consulting Fishbone or Cause and Effect Diagram
(c) Schargel Consulting
STUDENTSDROPPING OUT OFSCHOOL
DROPOUTFishbone or Cause and Effect Diagram
PERSONAL REASONS
FAMILY REASONS
SCHOOL REASONS
COMMUNITY PRESSURES
HighIncidentsof criminalactivities
Ineffectivedisciplinesystem
Low abilitylevel
Low SES
12
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT PLACES STUDENT TO BE AT-RISK
• Low SES• Non-English-speaking home• Ineffective parenting/abuse• Low parental expectations• Dysfunctional home life• No parent involvement• High mobility• Low educational level
Family-Related Factors
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT PLACES STUDENT TO BE AT-RISK
Poor school attitudeLow ability levelAttendance/truancyBehavior/discipline problemsPregnancy
Drug abusePoor peer relationshipsNonparticipationFriends have dropped outIllness/disabilityLow self-esteem
Student-Related Factors
13
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT PLACES STUDENT TO BE AT-RISK
School-Related Factors• Conflict between home/school culture• Ineffective discipline system• Lack of adequate
counseling• Negative school climate• Retentions/Suspensions
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT PLACES STUDENT TO BE AT-RISK
School-Related Factors• Disregard of student learning styles• Inappropriate use of technology• Passive instructional strategies• Lack of language instruction• Lack of relevant curriculum• Low expectations
14
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHAT PLACES STUDENT TO BE AT-RISK
Community-Related FactorsLack of community support services Lack of community support for schoolsLack of recreational activitiesHigh incidences of criminal activitiesLack of school/community linkagesHigh poverty
Wells, S. E. At-risk youth: Identification, programs, and recommendations. Englewood, CO: Teacher Idea Press.
(c) Schargel Consulting
Why & How Are StudentsAt-Risk?
15
(c) Schargel Consulting
Who Are Students At-Risk
Background CharacteristicsRace/Ethnicity Dropout Rate
➨ White, non-Hispanic 7.3
➨ Black, non-Hispanic 12.6
➨ Hispanic 28.6
➨ Asian/Pacific Islander 4.3Dropout Rates in the United States: NCES, U.S. Department of Education
(c) Schargel Consulting
Why are students at-risk?
Status dropouts (16-24) by repetition of grade:
Ever retained 24.1%
Never retained 10.1%
16
(c) Schargel Consulting
Why are students at-risk? NELS:88: Reasons for Dropping Out of School
• Had poor grades/was failing school 31.4%
• Did not like school 30.0%
• Could not get along with teachers 15.4%
• Was suspended/expelled from school 10.7%
• Could not get along with students 6.4%* Dropout Rates in the United States
(c) Schargel Consulting
Who is at-risk?
Background Characteristics
Family Income Level/Dropout Rate
Low 11.0
Middle 5.0
High 2.1
Dropout Rates in the United States. NCES, U.S. Department of Education
17
(c) Schargel Consulting
TYPES OF DROPOUTS
PHYSICAL
PSYCHOLOGICAL
“PUSH OUT”
Dropout Rates in the United States NCES, U.S. Department of Education
(c) Schargel Consulting
WHO IS MOST “AT-RISK”?• Those with irregular attendance.• Those who are two years or more below grade level.• Those who show a disinterest in school.• Those who come from families with either a low or high income.• Those who are overage for their grade.• Those who are discipline problems.• Those with a language deficit.• Those who are teen parents.
18
(c) Schargel Consulting
Effective Strategies• Early Interventions• Basic Core Strategies• Instructional Practices• Making the Most of Community
Resources
(c) Schargel Consulting
Early Interventions
19
(c) Schargel Consulting
Family Involvement
Effective Programs Use a Wide-Angle Approach With Children At-Risk
• Family members • Employers • Community agencies • Educational System
(c) Schargel Consulting
Early Childhood Education
• Birth to 36 months—Brain development• Child Care—Develop readiness for
school• Grades 1-3—Key to academic
achievement; base for career awareness
20
(c) Schargel Consulting
Reading and Writing Programs
Most Successful Programs• Have a real-world application• Develop communication skills• Foster a love of reading• Include computer skills• Include math skills
(c) Schargel Consulting
Basic Core Strategies
21
(c) Schargel Consulting
Mentoring and Tutoring
Major Goals• Academic achievement• Career preparation• Behavior modification• Parenting skills• Social enrichment
(c) Schargel Consulting
IMPACT OF MENTORING• 46% decrease in drug
use (Tierney, et.al, 1995)
• 52% skipped school less (McLearn, et.al, 1998)
• 62% improved self esteem (McLearn, et.al, 1998)
• 66% improved reading and math grades(Waits, 2003)
22
(c) Schargel Consulting
IMPACT OF MENTORING
• 89% improved attitude toward life (Americorp, 2000)
• 80%improved study skills (Waits, 2003)
• 93% parent favorable comments (Youthfriends 2001)
(c) Schargel Consulting
Beginning Teacher Attrition is a Serious Problem
14% 24% 33% 40% 46%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year
Source: Richard Ingersoll, adapted for NCTAF from “The Teacher Shortage: A Case of Wrong Diagnosis and Wrong Prescription.” NASSP Bulletin 86 (June 2002): pp. 16-31.
23
(c) Schargel Consulting
Service-LearningImportance• Facilitates teaching and learning• Integrates learning and service• Requires collaboration with community• Connects learning to life• Develops sense of caring• Fosters respect for self and others
(c) Schargel Consulting
Alternative SchoolingTypes• School-Within-A-School• Residential• Separate Alternative• College-Based• Magnet• Charter
24
(c) Schargel Consulting
After-School Experiences
Components• Academic--support/enrichment• Recreational• Cultural• Social• Career exploration
(c) Schargel Consulting
Instructional Practices
25
(c) Schargel Consulting
Professional Development
Effective Programs • Long-term, school-based • Include demonstration, practice, and
feedback• Comprehensive staff involvement• Sufficient time and resources
(c) Schargel Consulting
Ineffective Professional DevelopmentMost programs are too brief, too
scattered, and too infrequentMost programs are not designed to
meet the needs of the schoolMost programs do not address the
problems of at-risk students
26
(c) Schargel Consulting
ACTIVE LEARNINGBasic Ideas of Learning Styles
• Multiple Intelligence - Nine Intelligences• Different processes of learning • Students’ preferred learning style• Require different teaching methods
(c) Schargel Consulting
Instructional TechnologiesBenefits
• Address individual learning styles• Provide active learning opportunities• Promote collaborative learning• Improve students’ attitudes• Engage student interest• Reduce inequities
27
(c) Schargel Consulting
Individualized Instruction
Individualize Instruction for All Students• Modified case management—counseling and
social services• Mentoring and tutoring• Instructional technology• Learning styles• Alternative schools
(c) Schargel Consulting
Community Collaboration
• Community agencies• Faith-based community• Business/Industry• Volunteers• Parents
Schools Cannot Do It Alone
28
(c) Schargel Consulting
Workforce ReadinessCareer Education
For All Students K-12• Is supportive, goal-oriented• Creates awareness of possibilities• Provides needed experiences• Develops work-place skills• Encourages positive habits
(c) Schargel Consulting
Violence PreventionComprehensive violence prevention
includes• A clear discipline program• Anger management techniques • A conflict resolution curriculum• Peer mediation• A caring and cooperative culture• A respect for diversity
29
(c) Schargel Consulting
Systemic Renewal
• Policies• Processes• Practices• Partners• Pennies
from Best Practice - Zemelman, Daniels and Hyde
MORE & LESS
30
from Best Practice - Zemelman, Daniels and Hyde
MORE & LESS• MORE experiential, inductive, hands-
on learning
• MORE active learning with all the attendant noise of students doing, talking,collaborating
• MORE deep study of a smaller number of topics
• MORE responsibility transferred to students for their work: goal setting, record keeping, monitoring, evaluation
• MORE choice for students: e.g., picking their own books, etc.
• MORE attention to affective needs and varying cognitive style of students
• MORE cooperative, collaborative activity
• MORE reliance on descriptive evaluations of student growth
from Best Practice - Zemelman, Daniels and Hyde
MORE & LESS• LESS whole class teacher-directed
instruction
• LESS student passivity, sitting, listening, receiving
• LESS student time reading textbooks
• LESS attempts by teachers to cover large amounts of material
•• LESS rote memorization of facts and
details
• LESS stress on competition and grades
• LESS use of and reliance on standardized tests
31
(c) Schargel Consulting
THE STARFISHThere was a old man walking down a deserted beach just before dawn. In the distance he saw a young child. As he approached the child, he saw him pick up stranded starfish and throw them back into the sea. The old man gazed in wonder as the child again and again threw the small starfish from the sand into the water.
The old man asked him, “Why do you waste so much energy doing what seems to be a waste of time?” The youth explained that the stranded starfish would die if left in the morning sun. But there must be thousands of beaches and millions of starfish,” exclaimed the old man. “Why are you making such an effort when it won’t make any difference?”
The young man looked down at the small starfish in his hand and as he threw it to safety in the sea he said, …
“It makes a difference to this one. And it makes a difference to me”