| Date post: | 06-Feb-2018 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | nguyenhuong |
| View: | 219 times |
| Download: | 4 times |
Shire of Capel
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
21 December 2016 13.1 Annual Report 2015/16 14.1 EIL Lots 2 and 3 Minninup Road, Stratham 14.2 Development Approval - Outbuilding 14.3 Town Planning Scheme No. 7 – Amendment No. 64 14.4 Amendment to the Special Rural Zone Area 1B Land Use Management
Plan 15.2 Audit Committee Minutes 15.7 Financial Statements for 30 November 2016 16.1 Local Emergency Management Committee Minutes
ATTACHMENT TO ITEM 13.1
Annual Report 2015/16
Attachment: Annual Report 2015/16 (distributed to Councillors under separate cover)
ATTACHMENTS TO ITEM 14.1
EIL Lots 2 and 3 Minninup Road, Stratham
Attachment 1 – Location Plan Attachment 2 – Limestone Slot Location Plan Attachment 3 – Extraction Slot Layout Plan Attachment 4 – Temporary Bund Plan Attachment 5 - Schedule of Submissions Attachment 6 – Draft Complaints Management Procedure Attachment 7 – Draft Licence conditions
ATTACHMENT 1 TO ITEM 14.1
ATTACHMENT 2 TO ITEM 14.1
ATTACHMENT 3 TO ITEM 14.1
ATTACHMENT 4 TO ITEM 14.1
SC
HED
ULE
OF
SU
BM
ISS
ION
S –
EIL
– L
OTS
2 &
3 M
INN
INU
P R
OA
D,
STR
AT
HA
M
N
O
SU
BM
ITT
OR
S
UM
MA
RY
OF
SU
BM
ISS
ION
C
OM
MEN
TS /
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N
1 IC
R15
539
As
owne
rs o
f lo
t 26
00 -
4 D
iam
ond
Str
eet,
D
alye
llup
we
do
not
supp
ort/
appr
ove
for
perm
issi
on t
o pr
ocee
d. W
e pu
rcha
sed
the
land
on
the
215
1 N
ovem
ber,
200
5 as
a r
espe
cted
re
side
ntia
l ar
ea w
hich
was
val
ued
acco
rdin
gly
- "A
Vill
age
in a
For
est
by t
he S
ea",
not
"A
Vill
age
in a
For
est
by a
Lim
esto
ne E
xtra
ctio
n M
obile
Cru
shin
g Pl
ant"
. W
e ha
ve pa
id La
nd
Rat
es t
o th
e Shi
re f
or a
n ar
ea w
hich
has
bee
n ad
vert
ised
as
a
qual
ity
lifes
tyle
an
d Fa
mily
fr
iend
ly s
ubdi
visi
on.
Your
let
ter
advi
ses
appl
icat
ion
for
extr
actio
n w
as a
ppro
ved
in D
ecem
ber
2010
and
ren
ewed
in
Ja
nuar
y 20
15 fo
r th
e ex
trac
tion
of
sand
w
hich
w
e ha
ve
neve
r re
ceiv
ed
notif
icat
ion.
O
ur
conc
erns
ar
e no
ise
fact
ors,
vi
brat
ion
thro
ugho
ut t
he g
roun
d ca
usin
g da
mag
e to
our
bu
ildin
g, d
ust
fact
ors
for
fam
ilies
with
Ast
hma
and
Alle
rgie
s an
d de
valu
atio
n of
our
pro
pert
y.
We
requ
ire
writt
en d
ocum
enta
tion
to a
dvis
e w
hat
mea
sure
s yo
u ha
ve i
n pl
ace
to m
onito
r an
d pr
even
t no
ise,
vib
ratio
n, e
xces
s du
st f
or
heal
th r
easo
ns,
limes
tone
dus
t de
posi
ting
on
build
ings
, ve
hicl
es,
belo
ngin
gs
and
traf
fic
man
agem
ent
for
heav
y ha
ulag
e ve
hicl
es a
nd
mac
hine
ry.
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
in
clud
e th
e cr
ushi
ng
plan
t an
d to
in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in
the
com
plai
nts
hand
ling
proc
edur
e fo
r w
ork
to b
e su
spen
ded
pend
ing
com
plai
nt r
esol
utio
n.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
We
wou
ld
very
m
uch
appr
ecia
te
your
un
ders
tand
ing
with
reg
ard
to t
his
mat
ter
and
supp
ort
our
conc
erns
.
2.
ICR15
418
It is
with
gre
at c
once
rn a
nd d
isap
poin
tmen
t th
at
we
lear
n th
at t
he S
hire
of
Cap
el r
ecei
ved
an
appl
icat
ion
for
chan
ging
the
Pia
cent
ini &
Son
Pty
Lt
d sa
nd p
it in
to a
lim
e st
one
min
e.
Firs
tly w
e ar
e a
disa
ppoi
nted
tha
t th
e Shi
re o
f Cap
el
only
issu
ed a
let
ter
to inv
ite c
omm
ent
on
4 O
ctob
er,
whi
ch o
nly
reac
hed
us o
n 7
Oct
ober
, le
avin
g ju
st
8 w
orki
ng
day
to
resp
ond.
Th
e ap
plic
atio
n fo
r th
e am
endm
ent
was
da
ted
9 Sep
tem
ber
2016
. Th
e be
low
co
mm
ent
on
the
prop
osal
on
ly
addr
ess
the
nois
e fa
ctor
, th
e du
st is
an
othe
r is
sue
all t
oget
her.
O
ur
stro
ng
ob
ject
ion
s ag
ain
st
this
lic
ence
am
end
men
t ar
e b
ased
on
th
e fo
llow
ing
:
Th
e no
ise
repo
rt s
tate
s th
at t
he n
oise
ris
k is
“lo
w”.
Tha
t m
eans
the
ris
k of
exc
eedi
ng
the
leve
ls
stip
ulat
ed
in
the
WA
Envi
ronm
enta
l Pr
otec
tion
Act
19
86:
Envi
ronm
enta
l Pr
otec
tion
(Noi
se)
Reg
ulat
ions
19
97
is
“low
”.
Low
is
d
efin
itel
y n
ot
goo
d
enou
gh
. P
leas
e u
nd
erst
and
th
at t
he
“Ass
ign
ed n
ois
e le
vel”
of
45
dB
LA
10
is
hig
her
th
an t
he
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
Our
equ
ipm
ent
is w
ell m
aint
aine
d w
ith
us e
mpl
oyin
g ov
er 1
00 m
echa
nics
.
Th
e m
oder
n re
vers
ing
nois
e is
des
igne
d on
ly t
o be
hea
rd im
med
iate
ly b
ehin
d th
e ve
hicl
es,
our
vehi
cles
are
fitt
ed w
ith t
his
mod
ern
type
.
W
e ar
e ha
ppy
to h
ave
the
Shi
re o
f Cap
el
visi
t ou
r op
erat
ions
at
any
time.
Yo
ur m
etho
d ho
w t
o ch
eat
the
requ
irem
ent
is a
mis
inte
rpre
tatio
n of
the
re
quirem
ents
and
is n
ot p
ract
ical
.
Th
e in
form
atio
n su
pply
for
the
m
anuf
actu
rer
is t
he m
ost
accu
rate
av
aila
ble.
Pl
ease
sup
ply
your
info
rmat
ion
on t
he
high
er n
oise
leve
l of cr
ushe
rs.
It
is o
ur u
nder
stan
ding
tha
t no
ise
trav
els
furt
her
on s
till o
r lig
ht w
ind
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
curr
ent
amb
ien
t n
ois
e le
vels
in
th
e ar
ea.
The
“Ass
igne
d no
ise
leve
l” o
f 45
dB
LA10
fo
r hi
ghly
se
nsiti
ve
area
no
ise
sens
itive
pre
mis
es i
s al
read
y qu
ite n
oisy
. It
ex
ceed
s th
e le
vels
w
e ex
perien
ce
curr
ently
in
Dal
yellu
p an
d it
is d
efin
itel
y n
ot
wh
at
we
bo
ug
ht
into
w
hen
we
inve
sted
in
D
alye
llup.
A
peac
eful
re
side
ntia
l en
viro
nmen
t is
w
hy
we
have
ch
osen
to
buy
prop
erty
and
live
her
e.
The
mo
del
led
n
ois
e le
vels
o
f th
e p
rop
ose
d m
inin
g a
ctiv
itie
s d
o n
ot
even
co
mp
ly
wit
h
the
alre
ady
noi
sy
reg
ula
tio
n
with
out
all
sort
s of
qu
estio
nabl
e fix
es r
ecom
men
ded
to t
ry t
o ac
hiev
e th
at.
Thin
gs
like
build
ing
a te
mpo
rary
noi
se b
und,
whi
ch is
jus
t a
heap
of
sa
nd
and
othe
rs
like
“the
ex
trac
tion
stag
es
wou
ld
need
to
m
ove
nort
hwar
ds
such
tha
t th
e w
orki
ng f
ace
acts
as
a no
ise
barr
ier
at a
ll tim
es”
?? a
nd “
the
cru
sher
an
d l
oade
r s
houl
d b
e p
lace
d as
cl
ose
to
th
e w
orki
ng f
ace
as p
ract
icab
le”.
So
wha
t ha
ppen
if
it is
no
t pr
actic
al?
They
al
so
add
thin
gs
like
“Add
ition
al
nois
e m
anag
emen
t sh
ould
inc
lude
ens
urin
g th
at
all p
lant
is w
ell m
aint
aine
d, p
artic
ular
ly t
he
exha
ust
syst
ems
and
that
br
oad-
band
re
vers
ing
beep
ers
are
used
in
lieu
of t
he
stan
dard
ton
al r
ever
sing
bee
pers
”. S
o no
w
we
(esp
ecia
lly s
hift
wor
kers
) ha
ve t
o lis
ten
days
, on
win
dy d
ays
the
nois
e is
di
ssip
ated
.
W
e ar
e no
t w
orki
ng a
t ni
ght,
like
whe
n th
e sp
eedw
ay is
on.
Ye
s, P
iace
ntin
i pai
d fo
r th
e no
ise
asse
ssm
ent
as w
e ar
e th
e on
e as
king
fo
r ap
prov
al,
Lloy
d G
eorg
e Aco
ustic
s is
a
prof
essi
onal
org
anis
atio
n an
d a
Mem
ber
Firm
of Ass
ocia
tion
of A
ustr
alia
n Aco
ustic
al C
onsu
ltant
s.
Ye
s, P
iace
ntin
i will
sto
p if
it is
fou
nd t
o ex
ceed
the
lim
its.
Bef
ore
we
rest
art
we
will
intr
oduc
e fu
rthe
r op
erat
ion
met
hods
. Y
es,
thes
e m
ay in
clud
e m
ore
sand
bun
ds,
as t
hey
are
effe
ctiv
e no
ise
cont
rol.
Ye
s, t
he e
xist
ing
licen
se d
oes
not
allo
w
crus
hing
, th
at is
why
thi
s ap
plic
atio
n ha
s be
en m
ade.
Th
e us
e of
the
lim
esto
ne fits
in w
ith o
ur
subd
ivis
iona
l pla
nnin
g.
It
is n
ot o
ur in
tent
to
exce
ed t
he n
oise
re
gula
tions
or
to m
ake
dust
, as
suc
h w
e ar
e no
t as
king
the
shi
re t
o al
low
thi
s to
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
to G
rrrr
r G
rrrr
r da
y af
ter
day
inst
ead
of
Bee
p Bee
p. K
eep
in
min
d t
he
reve
rin
g
bee
per
s fa
ll o
uts
ide
the
sco
pe
of
the
no
ise
reg
ula
tio
ns
and
co
uld
be
mu
ch
lou
der
.
Th
e so
und
dam
ping
pro
posa
ls in
the
Noi
se
Ass
essm
ent
is
base
d on
w
ork
prac
tises
th
eref
ore
the
Sh
ire
of
Cap
el
mu
st
con
du
ct
un
ann
oun
ced
p
erio
dic
al
ind
epen
den
t n
oise
m
easu
rem
ents
to
en
sure
th
at
the
no
ise
leve
ls
stay
w
ith
in t
he
limit
s. C
an w
e ge
t a
writt
en
unde
rtak
en
that
w
ill
be
done
? Th
e fu
ll re
port
mus
t al
so b
e m
ade
avai
labl
e.
The
unit
of
mea
sure
of
th
e “A
ssig
ned
leve
l”,
nam
ely
“dB L
A S
low
10”
mea
ns t
hat
the
nois
e le
vel
can
exce
ed t
his
leve
l fo
r 10
%
of
the
repr
esen
tativ
e as
sess
men
t pe
riod
. In
pra
ctic
e th
at m
ean
s th
at a
lo
ader
can
be
dro
pp
ing
a t
on o
f ro
ck
into
a
met
al
rece
pto
r ev
ery
few
m
inu
tes
bu
t ca
n s
till
clai
m t
o c
om
ply
, si
nce
th
e n
ois
e is
o
nly
p
rese
nt
for
10
% o
r le
ss o
f th
e ti
me
(ass
essm
ent
per
iod
).
The
clai
ms
in
the
Inde
pend
ent
Noi
se
Ass
essm
ent
are
base
d on
a m
odel
whi
ch is
pr
edic
tions
onl
y an
d i
s so
lely
rel
ian
t o
n
the
inp
ut
dat
a. T
he n
oise
lev
el d
ata
of
happ
en.
W
e ar
e re
quired
to
reha
bilit
atio
n ba
ck t
o fa
rm la
nd,
this
ex
trac
tion
will
it w
ill
help
us
to p
rogr
ess
our
subd
ivis
iona
l pl
anni
ng.
W
e di
sagr
ee t
he S
hire
of Cap
el is
als
o re
spon
sibl
e fo
r th
e ov
ersi
te o
f al
l ac
tiviti
es w
ithin
Cap
el t
hese
incl
ude
econ
omic
dev
elop
men
t.
Th
e lim
esto
ne w
ill b
e us
ed t
o bu
ild
road
s an
d w
e ar
e pl
anni
ng t
o ha
ve a
sc
hool
bui
lt on
our
site
.
Res
iden
ce w
ill n
ot b
e su
bjec
t to
co
nsta
nt n
oise
, no
r w
ill it
rai
se c
urre
nt
nois
e le
vels
sig
nific
antly
.
Th
ere
is a
ver
y la
rge
econ
omic
ben
efit
for
Cap
el w
ith P
iace
ntin
i st
arting
on
the
deve
lopm
ent
of o
ur s
ubdi
visi
on w
ork,
of
whi
ch
the
smal
l vo
lum
e of
lim
esto
ne
extr
actio
n is
par
t of
.
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
in
clud
e th
e cr
ushi
ng
plan
t an
d to
in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in
the
com
plai
nts
hand
ling
proc
edur
e fo
r w
ork
to b
e su
spen
ded
pend
ing
com
plai
nt r
esol
utio
n.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
the
min
ing
plan
t us
ed
in
this
m
odel
is
su
pplie
d by
the
man
ufac
ture
r an
d is
for
br
and
new
pla
nt.
It is
also
in
thei
r in
tere
st
to s
peci
fy l
ow n
oise
lev
els
and
we
do n
ot
know
ho
w
it is
m
easu
red
or
calc
ulat
ed.
Cru
sher
pla
nt n
oise
leve
l is
usua
lly m
ore
in
the
rega
in o
f 12
0 dB
A.
The
win
d sp
eed
is
assu
med
to
be 4
m/s
, th
at i
s on
ly 1
4.4
km
per
hour
, w
hich
is
pret
ty m
uch
a w
indl
ess
day
for
Dal
yellu
p an
d is
not
rea
listic
. Th
e te
mpe
ratu
re i
s as
sum
ed t
o be
20
degr
ees
C.
We
have
not
see
n th
at t
empe
ratu
res
for
the
last
six
mon
ths.
Tem
per
atu
re h
as a
h
ug
e in
flu
ence
on
h
ow
fa
r so
un
d
trav
els
sin
ce
the
air
mo
lecu
les
are
mu
ch d
ense
r at
low
er t
emp
erat
ure
s.
For
exam
ple
we
can
clea
rly
hear
the
noi
se
of t
he s
peed
way
rac
ing
during
the
eve
nt
and
that
is
seve
ral
kilo
met
res
away
, th
is
min
e is
onl
y a
coup
le o
f hu
ndre
d m
eter
s aw
ay
and
it is
go
ing
ever
y da
y.
The
com
pany
th
at co
mpi
led
the
Inde
pend
ent
Noi
se A
sses
smen
t w
as c
ontr
acte
d an
d pa
id
by f
or P
iace
ntin
i &
Son
Pty
whi
ch r
aise
s qu
estio
ns o
f ef
fect
ive
inde
pend
ence
. It
is
not
clea
r if
anyb
ody
at
the
Shi
re
offic
e ac
tual
ly u
nder
stan
d th
e N
oise
Ass
essm
ent
beca
use
it se
ems
they
jus
t ac
cept
the
se
asse
ssm
ents
on
face
val
ue.
So
th
is
rais
es
the
all-
imp
ort
ant
qu
esti
on
: If
no
ise
mea
sure
men
ts a
re
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
take
n
afte
r th
e m
ine
has
st
arte
d
op
erat
ion
s, a
nd
fo
un
d t
o e
xcee
d t
he
limit
s, w
ill P
iace
nti
ni
& S
on P
ty L
td b
e fo
rced
to
sto
p t
he
min
ing o
r is
it
goin
g to
be
a ca
se o
f th
em p
laci
ng a
noth
er s
and
bank
or
the
chea
pest
fix
tha
t m
ay n
ot b
e ef
fect
ive
and
then
get
the
ir o
wn
Aco
ustic
sp
ecia
list
to co
ntra
dict
th
e re
adin
gs an
d pu
t th
e on
us b
ack
on t
he r
esid
ent
to p
rove
on
ce m
ore
it di
d no
t w
ork
and
so o
n un
til
the
resi
dent
s (e
spec
ially
th
ose
in
clos
e pr
oxim
ity)
giv
e up
and
sel
l at
a lo
ss.
Onl
y la
st y
ear
the
sand
ext
ract
ion
licen
ce
was
ren
ewed
and
it
clea
rly
stat
es t
hat
n
o cr
ush
ing
p
lan
t is
al
low
ed
on
the
site
. SO
W
HAT
HAS
CH
AN
GED
? W
hat
chan
ged
was
tha
t th
ey “
disc
over
ed”
usab
le
limes
tone
an
d no
w
sudd
enly
is
ok
ay
to
have
a c
rush
ing
plan
t on
site
. B
ut
it i
s n
ot
okay
w
ith
u
s.
It
is
not
okay
to
su
bjec
t hu
ndre
ds o
f re
side
nts
to c
ontin
ued
nois
e an
d du
st s
o th
at P
iace
ntin
i & S
on P
ty
Ltd
can
prof
it fu
rthe
r. I
t is
no
t ok
ay to
ca
use
peop
le
to
lose
va
lue
on
thei
r pr
oper
ty
whi
lst
mak
ing
Piac
entin
i m
ore
prof
itabl
e.
THIS
TY
PE
OF
MIN
ING
A
CTI
VIT
Y
WA
S
NO
T P
RES
ENT
WH
EN
WE
BR
OU
GH
T O
UR
P
RO
PER
TIES
. In
fa
ct w
e w
ere
told
tha
t th
e sa
nd p
it w
ill b
e cl
osed
in 2
015.
If
the
Cap
el S
hir
e w
ants
to
al
low
n
oisy
an
d
du
sty
min
ing
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
acti
viti
es o
n L
ots
31
3 a
nd
31
4 t
hen
th
ey
shou
ld
no
t h
ave
allo
wed
re
sid
enti
al
dev
elo
pm
ent
so
clo
se
to
the
area
in
th
e fi
rst
pla
ce.
We
are
entit
led
to t
he s
ame
peac
e an
d qu
iet
as
the
rest
of
Dal
yellu
p. W
e w
ere
here
fir
st,
befo
re a
ny L
imes
tone
ext
ract
ion,
we
pay
th
e sa
me
hig
h
rate
s as
th
e re
st
of
Dal
yellu
p.
Who
wan
ts t
o w
alk
in a
par
k (w
hich
con
trib
ute
to o
ur h
igh
rate
s) w
hile
lis
teni
ng t
o cr
ushe
rs in
stea
d of
birds
.
W
e al
so k
now
fro
m e
xper
ienc
e th
at,
once
al
low
ed,
it m
ay n
ot s
top.
Ins
tead
it
coul
d ex
pand
. N
ext
year
th
ey
may
“d
isco
ver”
ne
w d
epos
its o
f lim
e an
d as
k fo
r an
othe
r am
endm
ent
and
so
it m
ay
go
on.
The
reha
bilit
atio
n of
the
land
to
resi
dent
ial l
and
whi
ch is
sup
pose
d to
hap
pen
in 2
019
coul
d be
dra
wn
out
for
a ve
ry lo
ng t
ime.
A
par
t fo
r th
e le
gal
an
d
tech
nic
al
issu
es i
t ca
n b
e ar
gu
ed t
hat
it
will
be
mo
rally
wro
ng
fo
r th
e S
hir
e o
f C
apel
to
su
dd
enly
allo
w m
inin
g r
igh
t on
th
e d
oo
rste
ps
of
its
resi
den
ce.
The
fact
is
that
thi
s w
ill d
rast
ical
ly c
hang
e th
e cu
rren
t pe
acef
ul
envi
ronm
ent.
W
e w
ill
have
a
cons
tant
min
ing
activ
ity n
oise
eve
n in
our
ow
n ho
me.
We
are
not
an
ti-e
con
omic
d
evel
opm
ent,
bu
t th
is p
roje
ct,
un
like
road
s o
r sc
ho
ols
et
c.,
will
b
rin
g
no
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
ben
efit
s to
th
e co
mm
un
ity
nor
wo
uld
it
cre
ate
any
sig
nif
ican
t n
ew j
obs
or
eco
no
mic
act
ivit
y. I
t w
ill o
nly
en
rich
a
few
in
div
idu
als
at
the
exp
ense
of
h
un
dre
ds
of
resi
den
ts.
It
will
o
nly
ca
use
mis
ery
and
fin
anci
al l
oss
for
the
resi
den
ce.
Bei
ng s
ubje
cted
to
cons
tant
noi
se h
as a
n in
fluen
ce o
n a
pers
on’s
gen
eral
wel
l-be
ing
and
heal
th.
App
rova
l of
thi
s am
endm
ent
can
resu
lt in
co
nsta
nt
com
plai
ns,
orga
nize
d pr
otes
t gr
oups
, la
w s
uite
s, r
ates
bo
ycot
ts a
nd t
he l
ike.
All
we
wan
t is
to
mai
ntai
n th
e cu
rren
t am
bien
t no
ise
leve
l. Th
ese
min
ing
activ
ities
w
ill
rais
e th
e cu
rren
t no
ise
leve
ls s
igni
fican
tly.
In
lig
ht o
f th
e ab
ove
plea
se c
onsi
der
the
resi
dent
s an
d do
not
app
rove
thi
s or
any
ot
her
amen
dmen
t to
the
min
ing
activ
ities
on
Lot
s 31
3 an
d 31
4. W
e tr
ust
that
you
w
ill d
o th
e righ
t th
ing,
the
one
you
can
sl
eep
with
, an
d pu
t yo
ur re
side
nts
first
. Th
ere
is n
o o
r ve
ry l
ittl
e ec
on
om
ic o
r d
evel
op
men
t b
enef
its
for
Cap
el i
n t
his
p
roje
ct.
3.
IC
1563
1 W
e ju
st w
ante
d to
you
(th
e Cap
el S
hire
) to
hea
r ou
r co
ncer
ns a
bout
the
new
lice
nce
been
issu
ed
for
the
limes
tone
nea
r us
. W
e ar
e in
Fri
artu
ck
road
and
we
alre
ady
have
issu
es w
ith t
he g
roun
d
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
shak
ing,
dus
t co
min
g in
our
win
dow
s an
d of
co
urse
the
big
loud
ban
gs t
hat
we
can
here
fro
m
our
loun
ge r
oom
. I
have
bee
n to
ld t
hat
the
new
cru
sher
for
Pi
acen
tini a
nd s
ons
is g
oing
to
be lo
uder
tha
n a
rock
ban
d??
Is t
hat
true
? As
we
love
our
wild
life
and
enco
urag
e w
ild b
irds
to
com
e to
our
gar
den
I do
not
wis
h to
lose
the
sou
nd o
f ou
r bi
rds.
Als
o w
hat
time
is t
he c
ut o
ff t
ime
to u
se t
he c
rush
er?
We
go f
or a
wal
k m
ost
nigh
ts a
t 6:
30-7
pm a
nd
we
wal
k righ
t al
ong
She
rwoo
d an
d w
e w
ould
hat
e to
hav
e to
hav
e to
yel
l at
each
oth
er o
n ou
r w
alk.
Can
als
o pl
ease
exp
lain
wha
t w
ater
res
ourc
e ar
e th
ey g
oing
to
tap
into
? As
we
are
very
wel
l aw
are
that
our
wat
er is
one
of
so
few
pre
ciou
s gi
fts
we
wou
ld li
ke t
o kn
ow
whe
re t
he w
ater
is g
oing
to
com
e fr
om.
Than
k yo
u fo
r yo
ur t
ime
Col
in..
W
e do
und
erst
and
we
need
to
get
this
rig
ht a
s w
e pl
an t
o be
Dal
yellu
p re
side
nts
for
a lo
ng t
ime
as w
e ju
st lo
ve li
ving
her
e.
cove
red
belo
w.
We
also
wou
ld b
e co
ncer
ned
by “
the
grou
nd s
haki
ng,
dust
com
ing
in o
ur
win
dow
s an
d of
cou
rse
the
big
loud
ba
ngs
that
we
can
hear
fro
m o
ur lo
unge
ro
om”.
How
ever
, w
e do
not
fee
l tha
t ou
r cu
rren
t op
erat
ion
or t
he p
lann
ed
oper
atio
n w
ould
hav
e th
is e
ffec
t on
Fr
iart
uck
Roa
d.
Lo
uder
tha
n a
rock
ban
d, y
es t
he
equi
pmen
t is
loud
at
113d
B,
rock
ban
ds
are
norm
ally
sta
ted
at b
eing
120
dB.
You
wou
ld h
ave
to s
tand
rig
ht n
ext
to t
he
crus
her
for
it to
be
at t
his
leve
l, In
Fr
iart
uck
Roa
d th
e le
vel i
s le
ss t
han
35dB
. Th
is is
abo
ut t
he s
ame
as b
eing
in
a Li
brar
y.
O
pera
tion
finis
hes
at 5
:00p
m,
so y
our
wal
k w
ill s
till b
e en
joya
ble.
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
: Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ICR15
740
I am
writin
g to
you
to
expr
ess
my
conc
ern
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
4.
rega
rdin
g th
e ap
plic
atio
n to
am
end
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry L
icen
ce –
Lot
s 31
3 &
314
Min
ninu
p Roa
d, D
alye
llup.
I liv
e di
rect
ly o
ppos
ite t
his
site
and
cur
rent
ly
enjo
y th
e ar
ea.
I am
con
cern
ed t
hat
if th
e pr
opos
ed a
men
dmen
t is
suc
cess
ful,
ther
e w
ill b
e an
incr
ease
in t
ruck
tr
affic
and
tra
ffic
noi
se in
and
out
of th
e si
te.
I am
als
o co
ncer
ned
that
the
exc
avat
ing
and
crus
hing
of lim
esto
ne w
ill a
lso
crea
te m
ore
nois
e an
d du
st in
the
are
a.
Whi
le I
am
no
expe
rt,
I am
als
o co
ncer
ned
abou
t an
y lo
ng t
erm
eff
ects
of ex
trac
ting
limes
tone
fr
om t
he g
roun
d so
clo
se t
o ho
mes
and
ref
illin
g w
ith s
and.
I u
nder
stan
d th
at m
ovem
ent
can
happ
en in
hou
ses
for
up t
o 2
year
s af
ter
they
ha
ve b
een
built
. M
y ho
use
is a
bout
8 y
ears
old
an
d I
am c
once
rned
abo
ut f
utur
e m
ovem
ent
that
m
ay h
appe
n ca
used
by
the
extr
actio
n of
lim
esto
ne a
cros
s th
e ro
ad.
My
othe
r co
ncer
n is
for
tre
es a
nd w
ildlif
e di
rect
ly
behi
nd m
y ho
use.
Our
pro
pert
y ba
cks
onto
a
poss
um c
orrido
r an
d w
e en
joy
the
flora
and
fa
una
surr
ound
ing
us.
I am
con
cern
ed t
hat
the
flora
and
fau
na m
ay b
e di
stur
bed
by t
he n
oise
, du
st a
nd m
ovem
ent
crea
ted
from
the
pro
pose
d am
endm
ent.
As
you
can
imag
ine,
I a
m a
hom
e ow
ner
that
has
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
the
truc
k tr
affic
wou
ld b
e ab
out
the
sam
e. W
e pl
an t
o ke
ep m
ost
of t
he
limes
tone
on
site
. W
e cu
rren
tly s
ell
limes
tone
whi
ch is
scr
eene
d fr
om t
he
sand
, th
e cr
ushe
d lim
esto
ne w
ill b
e ab
out
the
sam
e sa
les
volu
mes
as
the
exis
ting
scre
ened
lim
esto
ne s
ale.
The
back
fill o
f th
e pi
t to
the
pro
pose
d su
bdiv
isio
n le
vel w
ill b
e co
mpa
cted
and
ap
prov
ed b
y a
stru
ctur
al e
ngin
eer.
Thi
s en
sure
s th
at t
here
will
not
be
sett
lem
ent
in t
he f
utur
e ho
uses
.
Ther
e sh
ould
be
no in
crea
sed
effe
ct o
n th
e flo
ra a
nd fau
na t
han
curr
ently
.
It is
our
und
erst
andi
ng t
hat
nois
e tr
avel
s fu
rthe
r on
stil
l or
light
win
d da
ys,
on w
indy
day
s th
e no
ise
is
diss
ipat
ed.
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
som
e co
ncer
ns a
bout
the
sho
rt a
nd l
ong
term
im
pact
s th
at
this
am
endm
ent
mig
ht
have
. I
wou
ld r
athe
r vo
ice
them
now
rat
her
than
fee
l di
sgru
ntle
d if
any
of t
hem
cam
e to
pas
s w
ithou
t sa
ying
any
thin
g.
5
ICR15
739
We
had
a th
orou
gh r
ead
of b
oth
the
appl
icat
ion
and
docu
men
ts
prov
ided
fo
r th
e ex
trac
tion
of
limes
tone
in
D
alye
llup
thro
ugh
Piac
entin
i an
d Son
. Th
e En
viro
nmen
tal A
sses
smen
t do
es n
ot c
onsi
der
in
any
way
ef
fect
s of
gr
ound
vi
brat
ions
tr
ansm
itted
into
the
res
iden
tial a
rea
of D
alye
llup.
Th
roug
h th
e sa
ndy
unde
rgro
und
alre
ady
now
w
e oc
casi
onal
ly fee
l vi
brat
ions
em
itted
by
Pi
acen
tini
and
Son
sa
nd
min
ing
oper
atio
ns
in
Min
ninu
p Roa
d in
Dal
yellu
p. W
hat
wou
ld t
he le
vel
of
vibr
atio
ns
be
with
a
limes
tone
cr
ushe
r in
op
erat
ion?
Th
e En
viro
nmen
tal N
oise
Ass
essm
ent
done
by
LG
Aco
ustic
s as
sum
es
an
aver
age
win
dspe
ed
of
4m/s
an
d al
l w
ind
dire
ctio
ns
but
in
fact
th
e do
min
ant
win
d di
rect
ion
in D
alye
llup
over
the
last
5
year
s w
as
sout
herl
y (h
ttp:
//w
ind.
will
ywea
ther
.com
.au/
wa/
sout
h-w
est/
daly
ellu
p.ht
ml
Win
d ro
se
annu
al
5 ye
ar
aver
age/
BO
M)
and
thus
the
res
iden
tal
area
s w
ill
be
impa
cted
fa
r m
ore
than
st
ipul
ated
in
th
e st
udy.
So
far
in O
ctob
er t
he a
vera
ge w
inds
peed
w
as 4
.7 m
/s w
hich
is
high
er t
han
wha
t th
e st
udy
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
Ther
e is
litt
le t
rans
fer
of v
ibra
tions
into
th
e gr
ound
for
m t
he c
rush
ers.
It
is o
ur u
nder
stan
ding
tha
t no
ise
trav
els
furt
her
on s
till o
r lig
ht w
ind
days
, on
win
dy d
ays
the
nois
e is
di
ssip
ated
and
hig
h w
ind
nois
e w
ould
he
lp t
o di
ssip
ate
the
nois
e.
Th
e en
viro
nmen
tal n
oise
ass
essm
ent
uses
the
wor
st n
oise
tra
velin
g w
eath
er
scen
ario
s. H
owev
er,
if th
e w
eath
er
caus
es t
he s
ound
s ab
ove
that
the
mod
el
pred
icte
d, w
e w
ill s
top
the
crus
hing
and
de
lay
until
bet
ter
wea
ther
pat
tern
s.
Th
e G
roov
in in
Moo
, di
d no
t ha
ve a
ny
requ
irem
ents
pla
ced
on it
like
the
noi
ses
bund
s w
e ha
ve in
pla
ce.
Sim
ply
we
will
not
be
crea
ting
any
dust
bl
oom
s, I
f it
look
s lik
e w
e ar
e un
able
to
cont
rol t
he d
ust
we
will
sto
p w
ork.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
assu
mes
. An
area
the
stu
dy d
oes
not
cons
ider
at
all
is t
he
nois
e pr
opag
atio
n th
roug
h re
flect
ion
on low
lyi
ng
clou
d co
ver
with
no
or s
low
win
d m
ovem
ent.
We
freq
uent
ly
expe
rien
ce
the
prop
agat
ion
of
even
th
e no
ise
from
th
e su
rf or
no
ise
from
Bus
sell
Hig
hway
be
ing
prop
agat
ed
to
far
grea
ter
dist
ance
s th
an
the
stan
dard
no
ise
mod
ellin
g w
ould
pre
dict
. In
Dal
yellu
p no
ise
from
Gro
ovin
th
e M
oo c
an b
e he
ard
and
acco
rdin
g to
the
stu
dy
the
Cru
sher
’s n
oise
lev
el i
s hi
gher
tha
n th
at o
f a
rock
ban
d an
d th
e cr
ushe
r is
loc
ated
far
clo
ser
than
the
fes
tival
site
.
Ano
ther
con
cern
we
have
is
the
deve
lopm
ent
of
dust
blo
oms
from
the
cru
sher
and
han
dlin
g an
d m
ovin
g of
lim
esto
ne.
The
only
men
tion
of d
ust
is
on p
age
5 an
d 6
of P
iace
ntin
i an
d Son
’s R
eque
st
for
Am
endm
ent
to
the
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry
Lice
nce.
The
dus
t de
velo
pmen
t an
d pr
opag
atio
n of
ai
rbor
ne
dust
ha
s no
t be
en
asse
ssed
. Th
is
shou
ld b
e in
depe
nden
tly a
sses
sed
prio
r to
any
am
endm
ents
of
the
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry L
icen
ce.
It i
s no
t su
ffic
ient
to
assu
me
that
the
lim
esto
ne
has
a hi
gh m
oist
ure
cont
ent.
Why
the
n is
the
cr
ushi
ng e
quip
men
t fit
ted
with
dus
t su
ppre
ssio
n de
vice
s?
Som
e fu
rthe
r qu
estio
ns t
hat
aros
e:
The
Req
uest
fo
r Am
endm
ent
to th
e Ex
trac
tive
Indu
stry
Li
cenc
e m
entio
ns
dust
su
ppre
ssio
n
Th
e cu
rren
t lic
ense
is o
n lo
t 31
3 an
d 31
4.
W
e ar
e re
quired
to
have
the
wor
k be
hind
a b
und
or e
dge
of t
he e
xtra
ctio
n fa
ce.
This
is b
est
done
by
mov
ing
nort
h in
to t
he f
ace
to u
se t
he fac
e as
the
no
ise
refle
ctor
. M
ovin
g aw
ay f
rom
the
fa
ce w
ould
less
en t
he im
pact
of
the
nois
e re
flect
ion.
Noi
se a
sses
smen
ts a
re n
orm
ally
don
e to
7:
00pm
, w
hich
is t
he n
orm
al d
ay
asse
ssm
ent
period
. W
e w
ill n
ot b
e w
orki
ng a
fter
5:0
0pm
.
Yes,
the
lim
esto
ne e
xtra
ctio
n is
onl
y fo
r th
e pe
riod
of th
e cu
rren
t lic
ense
. R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
syst
ems
in
the
crus
hing
an
d st
ockp
iling
ar
ea.
Wha
t ar
e th
e w
ater
res
ourc
es u
sed
for
dust
su
ppre
ssio
n? W
here
is
th
e w
ater
co
min
g fr
om
and
how
m
uch
wat
er
wou
ld
be
used
fo
r th
e pu
rpos
e of
w
ettin
g m
achi
nery
an
d st
ockp
iles?
H
as t
he p
oten
tial
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
of
the
addi
tiona
l w
ater
use
bee
n as
sess
ed,
wat
er b
eing
a
scar
ce r
esou
rce
duri
ng t
he s
umm
er m
onth
s?
Why
do
es
the
Req
uest
fo
r Am
endm
ent
to
the
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry L
icen
ce i
nclu
de l
ot 3
13 a
nd
314
whe
n th
e pr
opos
ed li
mes
tone
ext
ract
ion
area
co
vers
onl
y lo
t 31
3 an
d th
e En
viro
nmen
tal
Noi
se
Ass
essm
ent
has
only
bee
n do
ne f
or t
his
area
but
st
ipul
ates
tha
t an
ope
ratio
n m
ovin
g so
uthw
ards
in
stea
d of
no
rth
will
be
m
uch
mor
e no
ise
inte
nsiv
e?
Why
do
es
the
timef
ram
e fo
r op
erat
ion
of
the
limes
tone
cr
ushi
ng
in
Dal
yellu
p m
entio
ned
in
the
Envi
ronm
enta
l N
oise
Ass
essm
ent
go u
p to
7
pm a
t ni
ght
whe
reas
the
Shi
re o
f Cap
el’s
cur
rent
lic
ence
allo
ws
oper
atio
n un
til 5
pm
? W
e co
nclu
de f
rom
the
tot
al a
vaila
ble
limes
tone
of
abou
t 60
.000
t a
nd a
yea
rly
extr
actio
n ra
te o
f 40
.000
to
ns th
e to
tal
oper
atio
n of
th
e m
obile
cr
ushe
r w
ill b
e lim
ited
to 1
1/2
to
2 ye
ars
whi
ch
is w
ithin
the
exp
iry
date
of th
e cu
rren
t lic
ence
?
6.
ICR16
945
As
a ho
meo
wne
r an
d ra
tepa
yer
at 1
0 Ja
de C
res
Dal
yellu
p (w
hich
is
ad
jace
nt
to
the
prop
osed
C
OM
MEN
T:
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
Cru
shin
g Pl
ant)
I
obje
ct
very
st
rong
ly
to
the
Cap
el
Shi
re's
de
cisi
on
to
gran
t pe
rmis
sion
to
Pi
acen
tini
&
Son
s ap
plic
atio
n fo
r a
Lim
esto
ne
Cru
sher
Pla
nt a
t th
eir
Har
ewoo
ds R
d sa
nd P
it.
This
is
a ou
trag
eous
dec
isio
n by
the
Shi
re a
nd i
t is
qui
te o
bvio
us t
he s
hire
has
no
know
ledg
e of
th
e no
ise
and
Dus
t pr
oble
ms
asso
ciat
ed
with
th
ese
type
s of
pla
nts,
With
the
pla
nt g
oing
24/
7 th
e no
ise
and
dust
ou
r ne
ighb
ourh
ood
will
be
su
bjec
ted
to w
ill b
e in
tole
rabl
e. W
e bu
ilt i
n th
is
area
to
be a
way
fro
m i
ndus
tria
l no
ise
and
Dus
t an
d w
e w
ish
it to
rem
ain
so.
O
ur p
reva
iling
win
d co
mes
fro
m t
he S
outh
Wes
t w
hich
put
s Sou
th D
alye
llup
righ
t in
the
fir
ing
line
for
any
Dus
t th
e pl
ant
crea
tes,
an
y D
ust
supp
ress
ion
met
hods
the
Com
pany
ins
talls
jus
t w
on’t
wor
k w
ith t
he s
tron
g w
inds
we
rece
ive.
If
the
Lim
esto
ne Pl
ant
is ap
prov
ed it
won
’t st
op
ther
e, t
he n
ext
thin
g w
ill b
e a
Lim
esto
ne B
lock
M
akin
g Pl
ant
It's
bee
n pr
oven
tha
t H
igh
Eart
h Bun
t W
alls
don
't w
ork
eith
er W
ith t
he r
umbl
e of
tru
cks
mov
ing
abou
t th
e Pl
ant
and
road
s, t
he c
runc
h of
fro
nten
d lo
ader
s dr
oppi
ng
thei
r lo
ads
and
reve
rsin
g up
(b
leep
ble
ep b
leep
) co
mbi
ned
with
the
Noi
se a
nd
Dus
t fr
om t
he P
lant
will
tur
n ou
r ne
ighb
ourh
ood
into
a
pollu
ted
was
tela
nd
with
ou
r ho
mes
be
com
ing
wor
thle
ss.
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
The
crus
her
will
not
be
runn
ing
24/7
, no
r an
y op
erat
ions
at
the
sand
pit.
It is
our
inte
ntio
n th
at w
e w
ill b
e ha
ving
th
e sa
me
effe
ct a
s w
e cu
rren
tly h
ave
on
your
str
eet.
If
it is
hig
her
we
will
sto
p w
ork
and
will
not
res
tart
unt
il w
e ca
n.
Th
e co
ntro
ls y
ou t
hink
will
not
wor
k ar
e cu
rren
tly w
orki
ng a
t th
e pr
esen
t.
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
Can
the
Shi
re p
leas
e se
e se
nse
on t
his
mat
ter
and
not
gran
t Pi
acen
tini
perm
issi
on t
o er
ect
a Li
mes
tone
pl
ant
in
Har
ewoo
ds
Rd,
w
e th
e re
side
nts
don'
t w
ant
it, w
hate
ver
the
mod
eled
no
ise
and
Dus
t le
vels
sa
y do
n't
belie
ve
them
be
caus
e th
ey c
an b
e Fu
dged
to
suit.
for
onc
e ca
n th
e Shi
re r
espe
ct a
nd lis
ten
to t
he R
atep
ayer
s of
Cap
el.
7.
IP
A25
88
We
wou
ld l
ike
it to
be
note
d th
at w
e st
rong
ly
obje
ct t
o a
licen
se b
eing
gra
nted
to
allo
w a
sto
ne
crus
her
plan
t to
be
esta
blis
hed
in D
alye
llup.
W
e liv
e in
She
rwoo
d D
rive
, ju
st o
ff H
arew
oods
, an
d ha
ve e
njoy
ed b
eing
on
the
quie
t si
de o
f th
e su
burb
fo
r se
vera
l ye
ars.
It
w
ould
no
t be
ac
cept
able
to
no
w
be
plac
ed
alm
ost
on
the
boun
dary
of th
is in
dust
rial
act
ivity
. T
he c
onst
ant
nois
e w
ould
no
doub
t be
inv
asiv
e.
No
mat
ter
wha
t th
e ap
plic
ant
has
indi
cate
d re
gard
ing
the
leve
l to
expe
ct,
at t
he m
omen
t it
is
com
plet
ely
quie
t an
d pe
acef
ul,
so a
ny c
onst
ant
hum
or
nois
e w
ould
be
dist
inct
ly n
otic
eabl
e.
Dus
t w
ould
als
o no
dou
bt b
ecom
e a
prob
lem
, pa
rtic
ular
ly
on
win
dy
days
, of
w
hich
w
e ha
ve
man
y! U
sual
ly t
he w
ind
com
es o
ff t
he o
cean
fro
m
that
direc
tion
tow
ards
our
hom
es.
Ano
ther
con
cern
is
the
addi
tiona
l tr
affic
act
ivity
up
and
dow
n H
arew
oods
Roa
d. T
he n
oise
fro
m
truc
ks w
ill a
lso
impa
ct o
n al
l th
e re
side
nts
in t
his
area
. Th
e st
ate
of th
e ro
ad an
d ge
nera
l ro
ad
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
It is
our
inte
ntio
n th
at w
e w
ill b
e ha
ving
th
e sa
me
effe
ct a
s w
e cu
rren
tly h
ave
on
your
str
eet.
If
it is
hig
her
we
will
sto
p w
ork
and
will
not
res
tart
unt
il w
e ca
n.
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
safe
ty w
ith a
ll th
e la
rge
truc
ks u
sing
thi
s ro
ad a
re
also
ver
y re
al c
once
rns.
W
hile
w
e ac
know
ledg
e th
at
prog
ress
is
in
evita
ble,
sur
ely
in a
cou
ntry
thi
s si
ze,
indu
stry
sh
ould
no
t en
croa
ch
on
alre
ady
esta
blis
hed
resi
dent
ial
area
. If
we
had
sett
led
here
, w
ith t
he
crus
her
plan
t al
read
y in
pl
ace,
it
wou
ld
have
be
en o
ur o
wn
choi
ce.
H
avin
g a
crus
her
plan
t ac
tive
in t
his
area
, do
es
not
give
us
an
y ch
oice
, an
d w
e ve
hem
ently
ob
ject
. I
wou
ld a
ppre
ciat
e a
resp
onse
to
my
conc
erns
.
8.
IPA25
89
I am
w
ritin
g to
ex
pres
s m
y ob
ject
ions
an
d co
ncer
ns o
f th
e co
nsid
erat
ion
to a
llow
a s
tone
cr
ushe
r pl
ant
at l
ot 3
13 a
nd 3
14 M
inni
nup
Rd
Dal
yellu
p.
The
unkn
own
nois
e co
ncer
ns an
d risk
s to
th
e re
side
nces
who
liv
e cl
ose
to t
he p
lant
sho
uld
be
cons
ider
ed fir
st an
d th
e fa
ct
that
no
ise
leve
ls
cann
ot b
e ac
cura
tely
pre
dict
ed s
houl
d ra
ise
real
co
ncer
ns for
the
shi
re.
We
have
pai
d go
od m
oney
to
purc
hase
blo
cks
near
par
klan
d an
d op
en s
pace
and
you
nee
d to
co
nsid
er t
he r
esid
ents
and
not
jus
t th
e be
nefit
s of
a few
. I
am n
ot s
ure
whi
lst
stat
ing
that
a c
rush
ing
plan
t w
ould
not
occ
ur a
t th
e si
te t
hat
the
shire
is e
ven
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
bein
g co
nsid
erin
g th
is o
ptio
n.
This
lic
ence
nee
ds t
o be
dec
lined
and
the
tax
pa
ying
res
iden
ts w
ho w
ere
here
fir
st a
nd t
old
in
good
fai
th t
hat
the
site
wou
ld n
ot b
e a
min
e si
te
need
to
be for
onc
e pu
t ah
ead
of b
ig b
usin
ess.
D
o th
e righ
t th
ing
for
the
bene
fits
of t
he p
eopl
e w
ho s
uppo
rt t
he s
hire
the
mos
t.
9.
IP
A26
07
I w
ish
to v
oice
my
conc
erns
and
obj
ectio
n to
the
pr
opos
ed p
lant
in D
alye
llup.
I
feel
thi
s is
not
som
ethi
ng o
ur c
omm
unity
as
a w
hole
wou
ld li
ke t
o be
app
rove
d.
We
alre
ady
have
to
de
al
with
th
e no
ise
and
plas
ter
dam
age
from
th
e ex
plos
ions
at
th
e ge
loru
p si
te.
I
do be
lieve
th
is ne
w pl
ant
wou
ld
pose
ex
tra
nois
e le
vels
to
the
com
mun
ity a
s w
ell
as r
isin
g th
e du
st le
vel i
n ou
r ar
ea.
The
imm
inen
t in
crea
se
in t
ruck
tra
ffic
als
o po
ses
a co
ncer
n as
Dal
yellu
p ex
pand
s in
to t
hat
area
in t
he f
utur
e.
I am
rat
her
disa
ppoi
nted
tha
t th
e pr
opos
al l
ette
r w
as n
ot s
ent
to a
bro
ader
are
a in
Dal
yellu
p an
d on
ly s
ent
out
to r
esid
ents
in
very
clo
se p
roxi
mity
to
the
are
a.
This
is
som
ethi
ng t
hat
will
the
lar
ger
com
mun
ity
wou
ld o
f be
en in
tere
sted
in r
ecei
ving
.
I ho
pe
the
shire
will
gr
eatly
co
nsid
er
any
obje
ctio
n le
tter
s re
ceiv
ed.
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
Th
e le
tter
was
onl
y se
nt o
ut t
o pe
ople
w
ho p
oten
tially
cou
ld b
e af
fect
ed.
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
Cou
ld y
ou p
leas
e pa
ss t
his
lett
er o
f ob
ject
ion
on
to t
he r
elev
ant
part
ies
for
subm
issi
on.
10
. IP
A25
96
We
my
fam
ily a
nd I
wou
ld l
ike
to o
ppos
e th
e gr
ant
of c
rush
ing
limes
tone
in
the
sand
pit
at
Dal
yellu
p.
We
brou
ght
our
prop
erty
on
the
unde
rsta
ndin
g th
at t
he s
and
pit
was
clo
sing
in
2015
, th
is h
as
gone
pas
t th
is d
ate,
and
now
the
site
is
turn
ing
into
a m
ine
that
wan
ts t
o in
clud
e cr
ushi
ng.
My
expe
rien
ce in
Min
ing
tells
me
that
the
cru
sher
w
ill gi
ve of
f m
ore
nois
e th
an cl
aim
ed in
th
eir
appl
icat
ion,
pro
of c
an b
e fo
und
whe
re e
ver
they
pu
t a
crus
her
on a
min
e si
te i
t is
the
fur
thes
t po
int
away
fr
om
offic
es
and
min
e si
te
acco
mm
odat
ion
beca
use
it is
so
nois
y an
d du
sty.
W
e w
aite
d ye
ar
afte
r ye
ar
for
the
prom
ised
sh
oppi
ng
cent
re,
prom
ises
th
at
keep
ge
ttin
g st
retc
hed,
now
her
e is
ano
ther
one
. W
e ar
e se
ekin
g le
gal
advi
ce a
s to
whe
ther
the
Cap
el s
hire
is c
ulpa
ble
for
mis
lead
ing
info
rmat
ion
that
im
pact
s on
pur
chas
e an
d is
the
shi
re l
iabl
e fo
r lo
ss o
f va
lue
to la
nd.
1. I
s th
e Shi
re p
repa
red
to p
ay f
or l
iabi
lity
for
land
val
ue lo
ses
2. W
ill Shi
re bu
y ba
ck th
e af
fect
ed pr
oper
ties
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
W
e al
so h
ave
expe
rien
ce o
n m
ine
site
s,
and
this
is n
othi
ng li
ke a
min
ing
oper
atio
n. T
his
a ve
ry s
mal
l am
ount
of
limes
tone
, fo
r a
very
sho
rt t
ime
usin
g m
oder
n eq
uipm
ent.
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
whe
n th
e no
ise
leve
ls
and
vibr
atio
ns
star
t af
fect
ing
hous
es.
3. H
as a
ny t
houg
ht a
nd o
r fa
cts
been
sup
plie
d on
th
e vi
brat
ion
leve
ls o
f th
e cr
ushe
r 4.
Can
the
min
e be
clo
sed
if no
ise
and
vibr
atio
ns
are
too
loud
. 5.
Will
the
shi
re r
espe
ct t
he r
ight
s of
its
rat
e pa
ying
re
side
nts
to
prot
est
agai
nst
the
site
ch
ange
s an
d bl
ocka
de t
he g
ates
to
stop
wor
ks o
n th
is s
ite.
Why
did
the
shi
re a
llow
bui
ldin
g of
hou
ses
so
clos
e to
the
pit
if th
ey w
ere
goin
g to
incr
ease
the
ag
e of
the
pit
and
then
allo
w c
rush
ing,
12
year
s af
ter
the
first
hou
ses
wer
e bu
ilt in
the
pro
xim
ity.
Apa
rt f
rom
Pia
cent
ini
mak
ing
mon
ey f
rom
thi
s th
ere
is n
o ot
her
adva
ntag
e to
Cap
el S
hire
or
the
peop
le o
f D
alye
llup.
W
e ca
n’t
supp
ort
this
app
licat
ion
and
belie
ve t
he
shire
shou
ld n
ot e
ither
.
11.
ICR17
152
Hi,
I w
ould
lik
e to
pro
test
at
the
prop
osed
new
m
achi
nery
to
be u
sed
off
of H
arew
oods
at
the
lime
site
fo
r th
e fo
llow
ing
reas
ons:
N
oise
po
llutio
n, h
igh
leve
ls o
f du
st e
spec
ially
for
tho
se
with
ast
hma,
eff
ect
of q
ualit
y of
life
for
tho
se
who
wor
k ni
ghts
/are
hom
e al
l day
. W
e ha
ve p
aid
a pr
emiu
m a
mou
nt f
or o
ur h
omes
as
they
are
ne
ar th
e oc
ean
and
ther
e w
as no
m
entio
n of
no
ise
incr
ease
at
the
time
of p
urch
ase.
One
of
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
our
reas
ons
for
mov
ing
here
was
for
pea
ce a
nd
quie
t an
d th
e oc
ean.
Fin
ally
, th
e ab
ove
will
aff
ect
our
inve
stm
ent
in
our
hom
e.
I w
ould
app
reci
ate
bein
g ke
pt in
form
ed o
f w
hat
is
happ
enin
g w
ith t
he a
bove
.
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
12.
IC17
151
I am
w
ritin
g to
vo
ice
my
conc
erns
ab
out
the
Plan
t ap
plic
atio
n fr
om P
iace
ntin
i. Apa
rt f
rom
the
ob
viou
s no
ise,
to
not
only
tho
se w
ho liv
e ne
ares
t to
th
e pl
ant
but
all
Dal
yellu
p,
as
soun
d do
es
trav
el
as
we
all
know
by
th
e so
und
of
the
Spe
edW
ay w
hen
even
ts a
re o
n. D
ust
can
have
he
alth
is
sues
fo
r al
l ag
es,
and
im su
re it
will
tr
avel
fur
ther
tha
n th
e 25
0mts
as
wro
te.
No
one
whe
re e
ver
it w
as,
wou
ld w
ant
to l
ive
near
the
cr
ushe
r pl
ant.
So
plea
se c
onsi
der
the
com
mun
ity o
f D
alye
llup
and
don'
t al
low
thi
s pl
ant
so n
ear
us.
We
don'
t pa
y hi
gh r
ates
to
live
with
thi
s.
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
13.
IPA26
38
We
have
rec
ently
ret
urne
d fr
om h
olid
ay t
o le
arn
of t
he a
bove
app
licat
ion.
We
wis
h to
con
vey
our
stro
nges
t ob
ject
ions
to
it. I
t w
ill i
mpa
ct u
s on
se
vera
l po
ints
. Fi
rstly
the
noi
se w
ill v
ery
muc
h af
fect
our
qua
lity
of l
ife.
We
purc
hase
d ou
r la
nd
so w
e co
uld
enjo
y th
e su
rrou
ndin
g se
ttin
g no
t to
ha
ve to
co
nten
d w
ith in
dust
rial
no
ise.
D
ust
is
anot
her
issu
e th
at
will
be
a
maj
or
prob
lem
ca
used
by
th
is
proc
ess.
Bot
h to
he
alth
&
pr
oper
ty.
W
e ha
ve k
now
ledg
e of
a s
imila
r si
tuat
ion
in a
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
Th
is w
ould
not
be
anyt
hing
like
the
si
tuat
ion
you
men
tion.
Th
ere
will
be
no e
ffec
t on
Gel
orup
or
Str
atha
m.
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
sout
h w
est
tow
n w
here
the
hou
seho
lder
s w
ere
2 km
's a
way
and
the
noi
se w
as s
o lo
ud t
hey
coul
d no
t oc
cupy
the
ir h
omes
whi
le t
he p
lant
was
bei
ng
used
. Als
o a
thic
k la
yer
of
dust
co
vere
d ev
eryt
hing
. Th
ere
is al
so th
e im
pact
th
is w
ill ha
ve on
us
fin
anci
ally
not
onl
y on
our
hom
e bu
t on
the
ren
tal
prop
erty
w
e ha
ve
whe
re
our
tena
nts
have
al
read
y in
dica
ted
that
the
y w
ill n
ot r
enew
the
ir
leas
e if
the
appl
icat
ion
goes
ah
ead.
It
w
ill be
im
poss
ible
to
ge
t ne
w
tena
nts
in
the
circ
umst
ance
s.
We
urge
the
shi
re t
o re
ject
thi
s pr
opos
al t
hat
will
im
pact
on
the
resi
dent
s of
Dal
yellu
p, S
trat
ham
an
d G
elor
up s
o th
ey c
an c
arry
on
enjo
ying
liv
ing
in b
eaut
iful,
peac
eful
sur
roun
ding
s.
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
14.
ICR17
201
In
rega
rd
to
the
prop
osed
ex
pans
ion
at
the
abov
e si
te b
y Pi
acen
tini
& s
on,
I w
ould
lik
e to
op
pose
th
is
amen
dmen
t.
I liv
e on
Hor
nibr
ook
road
and
am
app
roxi
mat
ely
a tw
o m
inut
e dr
ive
from
the
'sa
nd p
it' m
ine
site
. Th
e ad
ditio
n of
a c
rush
er w
ill h
ave
a ne
gativ
e ef
fect
on
the
area
, th
e du
st a
nd n
oise
cre
ated
will
be
det
rim
enta
l to
the
are
a an
d th
e en
viro
nmen
t.
I w
ork
in m
inin
g an
d sp
ecifi
cally
with
Cru
sher
s an
d am
ful
ly a
war
e of
the
noi
se a
nd d
ust
whi
ch
they
cr
eate
. If
thi
s lic
ense
is
gran
ted
I am
cer
tain
tha
t th
e ne
gativ
e af
fect
on
the
subu
rb w
ill b
e m
assi
ve a
nd
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
W
e al
so h
ave
expe
rien
ce o
n m
ine
site
s,
and
this
is n
othi
ng li
ke a
min
ing
oper
atio
n. T
his
a ve
ry s
mal
l am
ount
of
limes
tone
, fo
r a
very
sho
rt t
ime
usin
g m
oder
n eq
uipm
ent.
The
gran
ting
of t
his
licen
se w
ill a
id u
s to
de
velo
p ou
r pl
anne
d la
nd s
ubdi
visi
on.
This
will
hav
e th
e op
posi
te e
ffec
t th
en
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
wou
ld
mak
e cu
rren
t re
side
nts
thin
k ab
out
mov
ing
and
also
an
y po
tent
ial
new
re
side
nts
thin
k tw
ice
abou
t m
ovin
g in
to D
alye
llup.
that
you
r pr
edic
tion.
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
15
IC
1736
8 As
a ho
meo
wne
r of
tw
o pr
oper
ties
in D
alye
llup
– ou
r pr
imar
y ho
me
bein
g in
th
e la
st
bloc
k of
ho
uses
opp
osite
the
abo
ve s
ite,
we
feel
tha
t th
is
licen
ce w
ould
be
detr
imen
tal t
o th
e va
lue
of b
oth
our
prop
ertie
s.
Had
we
been
aw
are
that
thi
s am
endm
ent
mig
ht t
ake
plac
e, w
e w
ould
nev
er
have
inv
este
d in
the
hom
e w
e cu
rren
tly
live
in
whi
ch i
s in
suc
h cl
ose
prox
imity
to
the
site
in
ques
tion.
W
e ha
ve n
o do
ubt
in o
ur m
inds
tha
t se
lling
our
pro
pert
ies
wou
ld b
e pr
oble
mat
ic.
We
obje
ct o
n th
e gr
ound
s th
at w
e w
ill b
e di
rect
ly
affe
cted
by
the
nois
e an
d du
st le
vels
, de
spite
any
EI
A
asse
ssm
ents
/rep
orts
th
at
may
ha
ve
been
ca
rrie
d ou
t.
We
purc
hase
d ou
r pr
imar
y ho
me
whi
ch w
as i
n a
peac
eful
“re
side
ntia
l ar
ea”
– w
e ha
ve
no
desi
re
to
be
forc
ed
to
live
in
an
“ind
ustr
ial
area
”.
It
is
un
acce
ptab
le
and
we
cann
ot s
ee h
ow t
he C
ounc
il ca
n ag
ree
to t
his
amen
dmen
t be
ing
pass
ed.
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
W
e ar
e no
t tu
rnin
g it
into
an
indu
strial
ar
ea.
This
will
aid
us
to d
evel
op o
ur
plan
ned
land
sub
divi
sion
. R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
16
IPA26
66
I’m
ver
y co
ncer
ned
that
in
a co
nver
satio
n w
ith a
fr
iend
who
liv
es n
ot f
ar f
rom
the
se l
ots
and
she
CO
MM
ENT:
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
men
tione
d th
at
they
ha
d re
ceiv
ed
a le
tter
ad
visi
ng y
ou p
ropo
se t
o al
low
san
d cr
ushi
ng t
o ta
ke p
lace
.
She
als
o ga
ve m
e a
copy
of
a le
tter
fro
m a
n an
onym
ous
conc
erne
d re
side
nt w
hich
det
ails
how
th
e no
ise
asse
ssm
ent
that
you
’ve
been
giv
en a
nd
whi
ch
appe
ars
on
your
w
ebsi
te
is
gros
sly
inac
cura
te (
atta
ched
).
I’m
uns
ure
why
we
have
not
bee
n ad
vise
d in
w
ritin
g of
thi
s pr
opos
al,
give
n it
will
im
pact
our
qu
ality
of
life
– w
e al
read
y he
ar t
he n
oise
fro
m
Bun
bury
Spe
edw
ay
whi
ch
is
a co
nsid
erab
ly
long
er d
ista
nce
away
tha
n th
is p
ropo
sed
crus
her.
Als
o, m
y ch
ildre
n at
tend
Oce
an F
ores
t Lu
ther
an
Col
lege
whi
ch w
ould
be
impa
cted
by
both
noi
se
and
dust
pol
lutio
n.
I th
eref
ore
wis
h to
reg
iste
r ou
r co
ncer
ns a
bout
th
is p
ropo
sal.
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
Th
e le
tter
was
onl
y se
nt o
ut t
o pe
ople
w
ho p
oten
tially
cou
ld b
e af
fect
ed.
Th
ere
will
be
no e
ffec
t on
the
Oce
an
Fore
st L
uthe
ran
Col
lege
. R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
17
IPA26
68
I ha
ve
man
y co
ncer
ns
abou
t th
is
prop
osed
am
endm
ent;
so
me
of
whi
ch
I ha
ve
outli
ned
belo
w.
Usi
ng a
mod
el w
ith a
pre
dict
ion
base
d so
lely
on
data
tha
t is
sup
plie
d by
the
man
ufac
ture
r an
d no
in
depe
nden
t so
urce
s is
con
cern
ing.
How
do
we
know
if t
his
data
has
bia
s or
not
? Th
e pr
edic
ted
nois
e le
vels
of
11
1 db
a is
w
ell
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A a
nd o
ther
poi
nts
rais
ed a
re
cove
red
belo
w.
The
mod
el s
how
s ho
w t
he n
oise
is
diss
ipat
ed s
o it
will
go
dow
n to
35d
B.
Th
ere
are
man
y so
urce
s of
san
d on
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
abov
e th
e cu
rren
t no
ise
leve
ls i
n th
e ar
ea.
Is
ther
e an
y da
ta t
hat
cont
radi
cts
this
?
The
sand
ex
trac
tion
licen
ce
has
only
re
cent
ly
been
ren
ewed
and
sta
ted
no c
rush
ing
plan
t is
al
low
ed o
n si
te.
This
is
a re
side
ntia
l ar
ea a
nd w
e pa
y th
e sa
me
rate
s as
the
res
t of
Dal
yellu
p an
d in
tur
n de
serv
e th
e sa
me
peac
e an
d qu
iet.
Th
ere
is a
lrea
dy e
xces
s sa
nd o
n th
e ro
ads
and
arou
nd m
y ho
use
that
I c
lean
aw
ay w
hich
cou
ld
only
hav
e co
me
from
lot
2 an
d 3.
Sin
khol
es a
re c
omm
on w
here
the
roc
k be
low
is
limes
tone
tha
t ca
n be
nat
ural
ly d
isso
lved
so
why
w
ould
any
one
wan
t to
nnes
of
it re
mov
ed f
rom
a
futu
re a
rea
of r
esid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t.
This
am
endm
ent
wou
ld o
nly
bene
fit t
he c
ompa
ny
to t
he d
etrim
ent
of r
esid
ents
.
road
s in
Dal
yellu
p.
Th
e ba
ckfil
l of th
e pi
t to
the
pro
pose
d su
bdiv
isio
n le
vel w
ill b
e co
mpa
cted
and
ap
prov
ed b
y a
stru
ctur
al e
ngin
eer.
Thi
s en
sure
d th
at t
here
will
not
be
any
sett
lem
ent
or s
inkh
oles
in t
he f
utur
e ho
uses
. R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
18
IPA26
69
I am
co
ncer
ned
abou
t th
is
exte
nsio
n to
th
e lic
ense
be
caus
e I
have
ex
perien
ced
grou
nd
rum
blin
gs a
bout
onc
e a
wee
k.
Thes
e ru
mbl
ings
com
e fr
om t
he s
and
pit.
I c
an
only
ass
ume
that
the
y ar
e ripp
ing
up li
mes
tone
. Th
ese
soun
ds ar
e re
ally
vi
brat
ions
tr
ansm
itted
th
roug
h th
e gr
ound
. H
ow w
ill t
hey
prev
ent
this
?
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
the
Noi
se a
nd D
ust
Man
agem
ent
Plan
s fo
r th
e si
te t
o in
clud
e th
e cr
ushi
ng p
lant
and
to
incl
ude
prov
isio
ns in
the
com
plai
nts
hand
ling
proc
edur
e fo
r w
ork
to b
e su
spen
ded
pend
ing
com
plai
nt r
esol
utio
n.
19
IP
A26
70
I w
ould
like
to
prot
est
at t
he p
ropo
sed
new
sto
ne
crus
her
plan
t at
th
e Pi
ance
ntin
i lim
e si
te,
Har
ewoo
ds
Roa
d,
Dal
yellu
p fo
r th
e fo
llow
ing
reas
ons:
- N
oise
pol
lutio
n -
my
husb
and
wor
ks n
ight
s as
pa
rt o
f hi
s ro
ster
and
doe
sn't
need
to
be k
ept
awak
e du
ring
the
day
and
I'm
hom
e m
ost
days
an
d w
ould
ra
ther
lis
ten
to
the
ocea
n!
Dus
t -
espe
cial
ly
for
thos
e w
ith
brea
thin
g di
ffic
ultie
s.
Hou
se a
nd l
and
valu
e -
we
boug
ht o
ur l
and
at a
pr
emiu
m
beca
use
it is
ne
ar
the
ocea
n,
we
wer
en't
told
tha
t th
is p
lant
was
com
ing
whe
n w
e bu
ilt,
and
we
fear
tha
t it
will
dec
reas
e th
e va
lue
of
our
hom
e.
Qua
lity
of l
ife -
we
boug
ht i
n th
is a
rea
so w
e co
uld
hear
the
oce
an,
and
we
also
lov
e lis
teni
ng
to t
he b
irds
and
fro
gs!
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
th
e N
oise
and
Dus
t M
anag
emen
t Pl
ans
for
the
site
to
incl
ude
the
crus
hing
pla
nt a
nd t
o in
clud
e pr
ovis
ions
in t
he c
ompl
aint
s ha
ndlin
g pr
oced
ure
for
wor
k to
be
susp
ende
d pe
ndin
g co
mpl
aint
res
olut
ion.
20
IPA26
71
We
wou
ld
like
to
voic
e ou
r ob
ject
ion
to
the
appl
icat
ion
to
amen
d th
e Ex
trac
tive
Indu
stry
Li
cenc
e th
at P
iace
ntin
i & S
on h
as a
pplie
d fo
r.
We
live
on E
dwin
ston
e Clo
se f
acin
g H
arew
oods
Roa
d,
whi
ch
we
purc
hase
d be
caus
e of
th
e lo
catio
n of
the
bus
h an
d ru
ral
outlo
ok.
But
the
du
st
and
the
nois
e of
th
e tr
ucks
al
one
is
a pr
oble
m
with
out
addi
ng
a cr
ushe
r an
d th
e
CO
MM
ENT:
Ref
er A
ppen
dix
A
No
othe
r po
ints
see
med
to
be r
aise
d ab
ove
thos
e co
vere
d in
App
endi
x A
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Shi
re o
ffic
ers
reco
mm
end
the
appl
ican
t re
vise
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
pote
ntia
l ad
ded
equi
pmen
t ne
eded
fo
r th
is
extr
actio
n. A
part
fro
m t
he d
ust
and
nois
e cr
eate
d by
the
cru
sher
and
add
ed e
quip
men
t ou
r ot
her
maj
or c
once
rn i
s th
e tr
ucks
tha
t w
ill b
e m
ovin
g th
is
lime
ston
e,
as
alre
ady
with
th
e tr
ucks
m
ovin
g th
e sa
nd o
ut,
It h
as b
een
a ni
ght
mar
e ju
st w
ith t
hem
. Th
e no
ise
pollu
tion
of t
he t
ruck
s w
ith t
he s
and,
and
the
dus
t ca
used
by
the
truc
ks,
grin
ding
the
san
d up
alo
ne i
s ho
rren
dous
and
is
an o
ngoi
ng p
robl
em,
our
hous
e an
d ca
r in
the
lo
ck u
p ga
rage
is
just
alw
ays
cove
red
in
a ve
ry
fine
dust
, an
d w
e ha
ve t
o ke
ep o
ur S
outh
fac
ing
win
dow
s/do
or s
hut
90 %
of
the
time
due
to t
he
dust
and
noi
se o
f th
e tr
ucks
.
So
I w
ould
hat
e to
kn
ow w
hat
the
dust
fro
m t
he l
ime
ston
e w
ould
ca
use.
And
we
alre
ady
hear
the
pla
nt e
quip
men
t an
d th
e tr
ucks
tha
t ar
e on
site
& t
heir w
ater
tr
uck,
whi
ch is
not
rea
lly t
hat
effe
ctiv
e, a
nd q
uite
no
isy
on it
s ow
n.
Ano
ther
ar
ea
of
conc
ern
is
the
cont
inuo
us
vibr
atio
ns o
f th
e cr
ushe
r, a
nd w
hat
long
ter
m
effe
cts
it w
ill h
ave
on o
ur p
rope
rtie
s.
We
stro
ngly
app
eal
to t
he c
ounc
il to
rea
lly l
ook
deep
er
into
th
is
mat
ter
and
not
allo
w
this
ap
plic
atio
n th
roug
h.
the
Noi
se a
nd D
ust
Man
agem
ent
Plan
s fo
r th
e si
te t
o in
clud
e th
e cr
ushi
ng p
lant
and
to
incl
ude
prov
isio
ns in
the
com
plai
nts
hand
ling
proc
edur
e fo
r w
ork
to b
e su
spen
ded
pend
ing
com
plai
nt r
esol
utio
n.
21.
IPA23
40 (
Mai
n Roa
ds
WA)
I re
fer
to c
orre
spon
denc
e at
tach
ed a
nd a
dvis
e th
at
Mai
n Roa
ds
has
no
obje
ctio
n to
th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent.
If
yo
u ha
ve
any
quer
ies
plea
se
phon
e
9724
566
2
CO
MM
ENT:
Nil
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Nil
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
Reg
ards
Pau
l Dav
ies
RO
AD
CO
RRID
OR P
LAN
NIN
G M
AN
AG
ER
22
. IC
R17
144
(Dep
artm
ent
of
Wat
er)
Than
k yo
u fo
r re
ferr
ing
this
app
licat
ion
to t
he
Dep
artm
ent
of
Wat
er
(DoW
) fo
r co
mm
ent,
in
clud
ing
the
docu
men
tatio
n:
‘Am
endm
ent
to
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry
Lice
nce,
Pi
acen
tini
&
Son
Pt
y Lt
d,
Lots
31
3 &
31
4 M
inni
nup
Roa
d, D
alye
llup,
Dav
id B
ills.
Sep
tem
ber
2016
’ (Bill
s).
Bill
s ha
s ou
tline
d th
e am
endm
ent
advi
sing
tha
t th
ere
will
be
no in
crea
sed
risk
to
wat
er r
esou
rces
of
the
are
a.
Giv
en t
he e
xist
ing
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry li
cenc
e an
d th
e na
ture
of
the
appl
icat
ion
- a
requ
est
to a
llow
cr
ushi
ng o
f lim
esto
ne -
DoW
has
no
obje
ctio
n to
th
e ap
plic
atio
n
CO
MM
ENT:
Nil
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Nil
23.
ICR15
754
(Dep
artm
ent
of
Plan
ning
)
The
appl
icab
le
port
ions
of
Lo
ts
313
and
314
Har
ewoo
ds
Roa
d,
Dal
yellu
p ar
e zo
ned
'Urb
an D
efer
red'
und
er
the
Gre
ater
Bun
bury
Reg
ion
Sch
eme
(GBRS)
and
loca
ted
adja
cent
to
a
'Reg
iona
l O
pen
Spa
ce'
Res
erve
. Th
e cu
rren
t sa
nd
extr
actio
n op
erat
ion
is
furt
her
clas
sifie
d as
a
non-
conf
orm
ing
CO
MM
ENT:
Nil
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
In t
he e
vent
tha
t th
e ap
plic
atio
n is
suc
cess
ful,
a G
BRS A
pplic
atio
n w
ill b
e re
quired
and
can
be
appr
oved
und
er
dele
gatio
n by
the
Shi
re.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
use
unde
r th
e G
BRS.
Und
er
Cla
use
27
of
the
GBRS
ther
e ar
e a
num
ber
of s
cena
rios
und
er w
hich
a
deve
lopm
ent
appl
icat
ion
is r
equi
red.
Th
is
appl
icat
ion
has
been
ass
esse
d in
ac
cord
ance
w
ith th
e pr
ovis
ions
of
th
e G
BRS,
and
in p
artic
ular
with
ref
eren
ce
to t
he N
otic
e of
Res
olut
ion
mad
e un
der
Cla
use
27,
Sch
edul
e 1,
Par
agra
phs
2 &
12
. •
Und
er
Para
grap
h 2
all
deve
lopm
ent
on
land
ab
uttin
g a
Reg
iona
l O
pen
Spa
ce R
eser
ve r
equi
res
plan
ning
ap
prov
al
unde
r th
e G
BRS
exce
pt fo
r a
few
ex
clus
ions
. In
th
is
part
icul
ar i
nsta
nce,
exc
lusi
on 2
(b)
can
be
appl
icab
le
whe
re
the
prop
osed
de
velo
pmen
t is
anc
illar
y an
d in
cide
ntal
de
velo
pmen
t th
at
does
no
t en
croa
ch
onto
the
res
erva
tion
and
whi
ch i
n th
e op
inio
n of
the
loc
al g
over
nmen
t do
es
not
conf
lict
with
th
e pu
rpos
e of
th
e Reg
iona
l O
pen
Spa
ce
Res
erva
tion
stat
ed i
n cl
ause
1O
(a)
of t
he G
BRS.
• U
nder
Pa
ragr
aph
12,
a G
BRS
appl
icat
ion
is
requ
ired
w
ith
any
exte
nsio
n an
d/or
ch
ange
to
a
non-
conf
orm
ing
use.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
Und
er s
ectio
n 16
of
the
Plan
ning
an
d D
evel
opm
ent
Act
20
05
(the
Act
) th
e W
este
rn
Aus
tral
ian
Plan
ning
Com
mis
sion
(t
he
WAPC
) m
ay,
by
reso
lutio
n pu
blis
hed
in t
he G
over
nmen
t G
azet
te,
dele
gate
an
y fu
nctio
n to
a
loca
l go
vern
men
t,
a co
mm
ittee
es
tabl
ishe
d un
der
the
Loca
l G
over
nmen
t Act
19
95 o
r an
em
ploy
ee
of a
loc
al g
over
nmen
t.
On
22 A
pril
2014
, pu
rsua
nt t
o se
ctio
n 16
of
the
Act
, th
e W
APC
re
solv
ed to
D
ELEG
ATE
to
loca
l go
vern
men
ts,
and
to
mem
bers
an
d of
ficer
s of
th
ose
loca
l go
vern
men
ts,
its f
unct
ions
in
resp
ect
of
the
dete
rmin
atio
n,
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
Part
s 7
and
8 of
th
e G
BRS,
of
appl
icat
ions
for
app
rova
l to
com
men
ce
and
carr
y ou
t de
velo
pmen
t as
spe
cifie
d in
sc
hedu
les
1 an
d 2,
w
ithin
th
eir
resp
ectiv
e di
strict
s,
subj
ect
to
the
term
s se
t ou
t in
sch
edul
e 3;
App
licab
le t
o th
is s
peci
fic d
evel
opm
ent
, un
der
Sch
edul
e 2,
Pa
ragr
aph
15,
any
exte
nsio
n an
d/or
ch
ange
to
a
non-
conf
orm
ing
use,
whi
ch r
equi
res
plan
ning
ap
prov
al u
nder
the
GBRS is
del
egat
ed t
o th
e lo
cal a
utho
rity
whe
re -
(a)
the
loca
l go
vern
men
t ac
cept
s th
e
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
reco
mm
enda
tion
and
any
advi
ce o
f th
e D
epar
tmen
t of
Pla
nnin
g, o
r (b
) th
e lo
cal
gove
rnm
ent
deci
des
to
refu
se a
ppro
val u
nder
the
GBRS.
The
Dep
artm
ent
of
Plan
ning
ha
s no
fu
rthe
r re
com
men
datio
n an
d an
y ad
vice
in
rela
tion
to t
he a
pplic
atio
n fo
r th
e ex
tens
ion
of t
he e
xtra
ctiv
e in
dust
ry
licen
ce a
nd s
ubse
quen
tly d
eleg
atio
n to
de
term
ine
the
GBRS a
pplic
atio
n is
with
th
e Shi
re o
f Cap
el.
24
. IP
A26
51 (
Dep
artm
ent
of M
ines
and
Pe
trol
eum
)
The
Dep
artm
ent
of
Min
es
and
Petr
oleu
m
note
s th
at t
here
is
limes
tone
map
ped
to t
he
nort
h of
the
pro
posa
l ar
ea,
but
it is
ste
riliz
ed
by
urba
n de
velo
pmen
t.
The
Aug
ust
2012
W
este
rn
Aus
tral
ian
Plan
ning
Com
mis
sion
pu
blic
atio
n tit
led
"Bas
ic
Raw
M
ater
ials
: D
eman
d an
d Sup
ply
Stu
dy f
or t
he B
unbu
ry-
Bus
selto
n Reg
ion"
hig
hlig
hts
the
scar
city
of
limes
tone
in
the
Sou
th W
est
in i
ts f
indi
ngs.
Th
eref
ore,
thi
s lim
esto
ne o
ccur
renc
e co
uld
be
a va
luab
le
prox
imal
re
sour
ce
to
the
com
mun
ity
shou
ld
the
extr
activ
e in
dust
ry
licen
ce a
men
dmen
t be
app
rove
d.
Alth
ough
Ex
trac
tive
Indu
stry
Li
cenc
es
fall
outs
ide
the
Min
ing
Act
19
78,
info
rmat
ion
on
min
eral
re
sour
ces,
in
clud
ing
basi
c ra
w
mat
eria
ls,
is o
f im
port
ance
to
the
Geo
logi
cal
Sur
vey
of
Wes
tern
Aus
tral
ia
(GSW
A),
a
CO
MM
ENT:
Nil
REC
OM
MEN
DA
TIO
N:
Nil
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
divi
sion
of
DM
P. T
he in
form
atio
n is
used
in
ou
r M
INED
EX
data
base
(h
ttp:
//m
ined
exex
t.dm
p.w
a.go
v .a
u/m
ined
ex/e
xter
nal/
com
mon
/app
Mai
n.
jsp
), whi
ch
is
a so
urce
of
in
form
atio
n fo
r ou
r
Sta
te-w
ide
reso
urce
m
appi
ng
syst
em
(htt
p://
ww
w.d
mp.
wa.
gov.
au/G
eoVie
w-W
A-
lnte
ract
ive-
1467
.asp
x ).
Th
e lo
catio
ns an
d st
atus
of
basi
c ra
w m
ater
ials
ext
ract
ion
site
s ar
e al
so
valu
able
in
puts
to
th
e G
SW
A's
re
sour
ce a
sses
smen
t an
d la
nd u
se p
lann
ing
role
. O
ur
aim
is
fo
r th
e da
taba
se
to
be
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
an
d up
-to-
date
so
urce
of
in
form
atio
n on
al
l m
inin
g-re
late
d ac
tiviti
es
thro
ugho
ut t
he S
tate
. It
is
a da
taba
se t
hat
is
used
to
info
rm o
ther
gov
ernm
ent
agen
cies
, as
w
ell
as t
he g
ener
al p
ublic
, of
the
loc
atio
n of
m
ines
an
d m
iner
al
reso
urce
s.
You
are
enco
urag
ed t
o us
e it
whe
neve
r re
sear
chin
g in
form
atio
n on
m
iner
al
or
petr
oleu
m
reso
urce
s, a
nd in
clud
ing
basi
c ra
w m
ater
ials
. A
cont
inui
ng
supp
ly
of
low
-cos
t ba
sic
raw
m
ater
ials
is
an i
mpo
rtan
t pa
rt o
f m
aint
aini
ng
the
lifes
tyle
an
d in
fras
truc
ture
th
at
all
Wes
tern
Aus
tral
ians
enj
oy.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
25.
IPA26
92 (
Dep
artm
ent
of E
nviron
men
t Reg
ulat
ion)
DER
un
ders
tand
s th
e pr
opos
al
invo
lves
cr
ushi
ng t
he l
imes
tone
ext
ract
ed f
rom
bel
ow
the
yello
w s
and
reso
urce
, an
d a
max
imum
of
93,0
00 t
onne
s of
lim
esto
ne w
ill b
e cr
ushe
d pe
r ye
ar.
Extr
activ
e In
dust
ry
oper
atio
ns
may
be
pr
escr
ibed
pr
emis
es
(for
ex
ampl
e Cat
egor
y 12
or
70;
Scr
eeni
ng,
etc.
of
mat
eria
l) u
nder
Sch
edul
e 1
of t
he E
nviron
men
tal
Prot
ectio
n Reg
ulat
ions
198
7. A
ny p
rem
ises
on
whi
ch a
n ac
tivity
(or
act
iviti
es)
liste
d in
Sch
edul
e 1
is
carr
ied
out
at a
rat
e th
at m
eets
or
exce
eds
the
prod
uctio
n or
des
ign
capa
city
spe
cifie
d in
Sch
edul
e 1
is a
pre
scribe
d pr
emis
es f
or t
he
purp
oses
of
Pa
rt
V
of
the
Envi
ronm
ent
al
Prot
ectio
n Act
198
6.
App
lican
ts
can
be
advi
sed
to
dete
rmin
e if
thei
r pr
opos
al
wou
ld
mak
e th
e pr
emis
es
pres
crib
ed
and
so
cons
eque
ntly
re
quire
an
appl
icat
ion
for
a w
orks
ap
prov
al.
Furt
her
info
rmat
ion
on
licen
sing
is
av
aila
ble
at
ww
w.d
er.w
a.go
v.au
/our
-wor
k/lic
ence
s-an
d-w
orks
- ap
prov
als.
N
ote
that
pl
anni
ng
appr
oval
s m
ay i
nflu
ence
DER
's d
eter
min
atio
n of
pro
duct
ion
or d
esig
n ca
paci
ty,
whe
re a
n ap
prov
al h
as t
he e
ffec
t of
res
tric
ting
capa
city
(s
uch
as c
onst
rain
ing
hour
s of
ope
ratio
n) .
Th
e D
epar
tmen
t ha
s no
t re
ceiv
ed
an
appl
icat
ion
rela
ting
to t
his
loca
tion.
CO
MM
ENT:
It
is o
nly
prop
osed
to
crus
h 40
,000
ton
nes
per
year
. An
appl
icat
ion
for
a w
orks
app
rova
l will
be
mad
e pr
ior
to C
ounc
il de
term
inat
ion.
R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
:
Incl
ude
cond
ition
tha
t an
y cr
ushi
ng p
lant
mus
t be
ope
rate
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
con
ditio
ns
of a
n ap
prov
ed D
epar
tmen
t of
Env
iron
men
t Reg
ulat
ion
Wor
ks A
ppro
val.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
The
purp
ose
of a
wor
ks a
ppro
val
is t
o al
low
D
ER t
o as
sess
the
env
iron
men
tal a
ccep
tabi
lity
of a
pro
posa
l's p
oten
tial
to c
ause
em
issi
ons
and
disc
harg
es
agai
nst
stan
dard
s an
d po
licie
s.
Wor
ks
appr
oval
s al
so
cont
ain
cond
ition
s to
en
sure
th
e pr
emis
es
can
oper
ate
in
an
envi
ronm
enta
lly
acce
ptab
le
man
ner
and
that
the
wor
ks t
hem
selv
es d
o no
t ca
use
unac
cept
able
env
iron
men
tal i
mpa
cts.
It
is
no
ted
the
quar
ry
is
adja
cent
to
a
resi
dent
ial
subd
ivis
ion
and
it is
pro
pose
d th
e cr
ushi
ng u
nit
will
be
loca
ted
less
tha
n 50
0 m
etre
s (m
) to
se
nsiti
ve
land
us
es.
DER
co
nsid
ers
that
a
sepa
ratio
n di
stan
ce
of
at
leas
t 1,
000
m
is
appr
opriat
e be
twee
n se
nsiti
ve la
nd u
ses
and
prem
ises
on
whi
ch
scre
enin
g an
d cr
ushi
ng
activ
ities
ar
e un
dert
aken
, w
ith a
hig
her
risk
of
impa
cts
to
publ
ic
heal
th
and
amen
ity
whe
re
this
se
para
tion
dist
ance
is
no
t m
et.
This
m
ay
resu
lt in
a
wor
ks
appr
oval
w
ith
addi
tiona
l re
gula
tory
con
trol
s im
pose
d to
miti
gate
ris
k.
DER
w
ill
unde
rtak
e pa
ralle
l pr
oces
sing
of
ap
plic
atio
ns,
how
ever
, w
orks
app
rova
ls m
ay
not
be g
rant
ed u
ntil
such
tim
e as
pla
nnin
g ap
prov
al i
s in
pla
ce.
DER
's p
roce
ss a
llow
s fo
r th
e pr
ovis
ion
of
a dr
aft
deci
sion
to
th
e pr
opon
ent.
The
pro
pone
nt m
ay c
onse
quen
tly
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
NO
S
UB
MIT
TO
R
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F S
UB
MIS
SIO
N
CO
MM
ENTS
/ R
ECO
MM
END
ATI
ON
prov
ide
this
dra
ft d
ecis
ion
in s
uppo
rt o
f th
eir
plan
ning
ass
essm
ent.
Sho
uld
your
sta
ff h
ave
any
quer
ies,
ple
ase
cont
act
DER
's
Act
ing
Plan
ning
an
d Adv
ice
Coo
rdin
ator
, M
s Cas
sie
Che
w,
on 6
467
5383
.
ATTACHMENT 5 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 1 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
1. PURPOSE
To provide details on the process for the management of stakeholder complaints pertaining to
operations at the Harewoods sand quarry.
To maintain positive relations with all stakeholders the community, regulatory and local authorities to
ensure compliance to the Extractive Licence.
2. SCOPE
This procedure applies to the Harewoods Sand Quarry operations pertaining to noise, dust, vibration,
road usage and any other non-amenity aspect that may give cause for a complaint from any
stakeholder.
3. LEADERSHIP, COMMITMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY
Leadership and commitment shall be demonstrated at all levels as described in the following table of
Responsibility and accountability. All personnel are responsible for:
§ Reporting of any non-compliances for dust, noise or vibration during operations.
§ Acquit all actions as assigned
Role Responsibilities
Management
and CEO
§ Provide the necessary resources to ensure all complaints are handled in a
professional and timely manner
§ Participate in any investigations and stakeholder relations/communications
as a result of the investigation outcomes.
§ Ensure all complaints are managed whilst remaining compliant
§ Ensure quarry practices are operated in accordance to regulatory and
local permits and the Extractive Licence
§ Ensure the Extractive Licence is current
§ Participate in quarterly management reviews to review complaint trends
§ Liaise with the local Council and community where and as required
Area Managers
Supervisors
§ Understand the noise, dust and/or vibration mitigation processes
§ Immediately cease any operations or equipment usage where noise, dust
or vibration breaches the permittable levels or a non-compliance occurs
§ Participate in daily review of complaints received
§ Participate in quarterly management reviews to review complaint trends
§ Immediately cease operations as instructed following a complaint
Project/Area Manager
§ Assume the role of complaints handling in collaboration with the CEO and
HSE and HR Manager
§ Participate in all investigations as a result of the complaints
§ Liaise with the local Council and community where an as required
§ Review all logged reports from complaints tracking trends
§ Liaise with the HSE Manager/Advisor on all regulatory reporting following
monitoring surveys.
§ Immediately cease operations as instructed following a complaint
HSE Personnel § Participate in quarterly management reviews presenting complaint trends
§ Conduct noise, dust and vibration monitoring in collaboration with the
Project and HR Manager
§ Record all monitoring surveys conducted, tracking trending and
exceedances reporting outliers to the regulatory body and local Council.
§ Complete all necessary reporting to the regulatory body and the local
Council
§ Lead all investigations as a result of a Level 4 or 5 complaint/s
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 2 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
Role Responsibilities
§ Liaise with the Project manager on all mitigation process for dust, noise and
vibration controls.
HR Manager § Collate any non-amenity complaints received and collaborate with the
Project and HSE Manager
§ Log all non-amenity complaints in the complaints register, reporting trends
and changes at the Management Meetings.
§ Participate in investigations as required
Personnel § Report all complaints received through to the Supervisor or Project
Manager
§ Operate all equipment at the operation in a manner to minimise the risk of
complaints.
4. PROCEDURE
4.1. Background
Harewoods is a sand pit operating for the sale of sand and limestone to customers. The operation
incorporates mining earthworks practices including excavation/dozing, loading and screening of sand;
crushing of limestone rubble. The sand and crushed limestone is made available for customers to cart
the product away.
The work is approved and carried out under the Extractive Industry Licence, all conditions of the
approval must be adhered to.
There is no blasting occurring at the operation, noise factors are as a result of the equipment operation
including the screening and crushing plant, loaders and conveyors loading transport trucks entering
the pit for carting the sand away.
Dust may be considered an issue in high/strong wind conditions and in particularly during the early
summer months, truck movement, loading screening and crushing operations.
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) is not considered an issue due to the surface mining operations
allowing for ventilation, the high frequency of maintenance on the equipment (greater than the OEM
standards) and the proximity to the residential housing with the buffer zone and windrow in place.
Vibration is as a result of heavy equipment operating on hard and rocky ground conditions. The
vibration is a risk to the operator, the equipment and through ground vibration.
4.2. Mitigation Practices
The Company is committed to their Environmental and Stakeholder Policy maintaining full responsibility
for ensuring sustainable mitigation processes are implemented and utilized with respect to the local
community and residents of Dalyellup and Gelorup. Mitigation practices include
Operations Times at the pit are between 7am and 5pm Monday to Friday; 7am to 12:00am on
Saturday with no operations on Sundays or Public Holidays. in accordance with the Extractive Industry
Licence.
Communications with the community are completed through mail drops, advertisements in local
papers and to and through the Capel Shire Council.
Dust
§ Weather conditions are monitored daily by the pit Supervisor.
§ Preventive controls used include use of water cart on roads and stockpiles to dampen all potential
dust zones.
§ Stockpile placement and management design reduces impact on the local community in medium
to low windy conditions.
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 3 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
§ When high to strong winds or greater are forecast, with the potential to impact the community,
crusher or screener operations cease until the wind drops to an acceptable wind speed that
minimises the impact on the community.
Noise
§ Control measure as stated in the Noise Impact Assessment – Harewoods Road Sand Quarry
Dalyellup and Environmental Assessment – Proposed Limestone Extraction Operations. These
included noise bunds and location of work operations.
§ Noise is monitored using an approved and NATA calibrated Noise Dosemeter completed by the
Senior HSE Advisor. All records from the noise survey are recorded into a database and any
reportable exceedances are processed immediately and investigated.
§ Machinery planned maintenance completed above the OEM requirements.
§ Vibration is monitored by the operators and the Supervisor through assessment of ground
conditions to ensure machine vibration is minimised resulting in reduced vibration through the
ground.
Refer: OH&H Management Procedure
4.3. Complaints
The Company is respondent to complaints from the community verbally via telephone or face-to-face
contact, in writing via email or mail from both internal and external complainants.
Complaints are welcomed from both internal and external persons and shall be reviewed
independently, logged and recorded and where applicable investigated. The HSE department shall
track and monitor amenity type complaints (noise, dust, vibration) and the HR Department shall
monitor the non-amenity complaints.
All complaints shall be directed to the relevant department, pending the context of the complaint.
Once recorded the HR Manager, HSE Manager and Harewoods Project Manager shall liaise to
determine the most appropriate action required to acquit the issue for the complaint.
Each complaint is taken seriously and following a review, is recorded and appropriate actions are
determined and assigned. All actions relating to complaints are managed through the complaints
database system. Feedback and/or follow-up may be required to determine if an action was
effective and the stakeholder is satisfied with the outcome.
Anonymous complaints will not be deemed complaints. Complainants who wish to remain anonymous
will be advised that their personal details can remain confidential. If they still wish to remain
anonymous the matter will be logged as a concern and not responded to.
Appropriate behaviour regarding receiving, responding, and actioning complaints is described in the
Stakeholder and Complaints Management Procedure and all risks are described in the ENV03
Stakeholder and Complaints Management Critical Risk Standard.
4.3.1. Amenity Complaints
Amenity complaints include dust, noise, vibration from the operations at the sand quarry.
Dust complaints shall be monitored and reviewed from pre-shift meeting weather condition and
operational reports. Monitoring of dust over an agreed period shall be completed with outcomes
recorded in the database.
Noise complaints shall be monitored and where the noise level is found to be non-compliant with
permittable conditions the complainant will be advised of the recorded noise level. Noise monitoring
will continue over a period of time and once compliance has been achieved the complainant will be
advised and the complaint will be considered to be resolved.
Vibration complaints requires a written explanation to the complainant outlining the cause and how
this could be avoided in future. The complainant and the Capel Shire will be advised of this and the
complaint will be considered to be resolved. Regular monitoring through equipment maintenance
and ground conditions will be completed.
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 4 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
4.3.2. Non-amenity Complaints
These are complaints other than those relating to dust, noise or vibration, that are investigated by the
relevant department depending on the complaint issue. These will be investigated on an individual
basis, where they are deemed as having a significant impact on the stakeholders.
Typically, these complaints can be pertaining to but not limited to:
§ Traffic access and usage at the pit via Harewoods road
§ Piacentini personnel
§ Treatment of the stakeholder when making a complaint or asking questions
§ Failure to respond to a complaint – stakeholder not receiving feedback on their complaint.
All non-amenity complaints reaching Level 4 or 5 shall be investigated and processed accordingly.
4.3.3. Action on Complaints Trending in Nature
The immediacy of reporting enables the company to modify its activity to minimise disturbance.
Consistent complaints of a similar nature, the company shall complete an investigation into the reports
received to determine if there has been a regulatory breach or if the complaint has merit. The
outcomes of such investigations assist the company with future planning activity.
Complainants should be encouraged to report promptly following a disturbance to allow immediate
follow-up to occur or, where this is not possible, provide information for the planning of future mine-
related activity.
4.4. Permittable Limits
All exceedances in noise, dust and vibration shall be investigated to determine the root cause and to
provide determinations for mitigation of the causes which can then be utilised to provide
improvements in planning.
4.4.1. Dust
Dust is considered as having the greatest impact on the local community and nearby residential estate
of Dalyellup. Details on Dust Management is described in several procedures pertaining to dust
management in earthworks operations to minimise any dust impacting areas outside of the quarry.
The Company is committed to their Environmental and Stakeholder Policy as described in this excerpt
“…by:….Implementing and maintaining an Environmental Management System to identify, assess and
minimise environmental and community relations impacts, across all sectors of our operations;…….”
4.4.2. Noise
Noise complaints are followed up immediately if reasonable to do so (within 2 hours of the complaint
being received or at the same time the next day)
The Senior HSE Advisor is informed and a decision is made to measure the noise if practicable (e.g
noise monitoring may not be practicable if the wind speed is greater than 5.0m/sec).
Our aim is to be at or low to the level as stated in Noise Impact Assessment – Harewoods Road Sand
Quarry Dalyellup and Environmental Assessment – Proposed Limestone Extraction Operations and to
fully comply with Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.
4.4.3. Vibration
Vibration complaints are checked and monitored through maintenance assessments of the equipment
to ascertain any vibration transfer and to mitigate the transfer to below acceptable rates.
4.5. Action and Resolution with the Complainant and Shire of Capel
The complaint is reviewed by the Project Manager, HSE Manager, and HR Manager to determine the:
§ Origin of the complaint (individual, company, local or state authority, etc)
§ Level of risk associated with the complaint context
§ Breach or non-compliance to extractive licence
§ Impact on the Company
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 5 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
§ Impact on the Community
§ Regulatory requirements and other commitments
§ Actions to be taken
§ The frequency of other complaints of a similar nature.
All Complaints received by the company (email, postal, telephone or face-to-face) shall be directed
to either the Project Manager, HSE Manager, or HR Manager and reported into the relevant database.
All amenity complaints shall be recorded in MYOSH to ensure tracking and trending is enabled. Lower
level complaints (level 1,2,3) shall be managed through standard process and will not require
investigation unless requested. Level 4 and 5 complaints shall be investigated and thoroughly
reviewed.
4.5.1. All Complaints
Company protocol requires a prompt and timely response to the complainant within two hours of the
initial report where practicable. All complaints shall be completed as follows:
§ Immediate acknowledgement of receipt of complaint to the complainant
§ Conduct an assessment at the site to determine the cause
§ Take action to minimise or cease the cause which may include one or more of the following:
(i) Stopping the screening or crusher operations.
(ii) Initiate water cart to reduce dust.
(iii) A change in work tasks.
§ Respond with the outcome directly to the complainant
§ A full report of the complaint and all outcomes, actions and plans shall be submitted to the Capel
Shire within two hours
§ Record all actions in the database.
Determination of appropriate corrective action shall be completed by all responsible persons. Action
recorded against the complaint shall be included in the communications with the Capel Shire.
In all instances the complainant shall be notified and provided with feedback of the outcome of their
complaint including the determined actions to rectify the issue.
All complaints that are deemed unresolved by the stakeholder/complainant may result in legal action.
The company shall direct their legal representative to act on their behalf to resolve the matter aiming
for a positive outcome for all parties.
Once all actions have been addressed the outcomes will be communicated to the complainant. If
the complainant does not wish to escalate the complaint it will be considered to be resolved.
4.5.2. Level 4 and 5 Complaints
All major non-compliance (level 4 or 5) shall be investigated and may require approval to
recommence operations in the quarry. The Project Manager, HSE Manager, HR Manager and the CEO
in liaison with the Capel Shire representative shall determine when works may recommence and what
conditions, if any, have been imposed.
The HSE Manager or HR Manager shall respond to the complainant prior to the restart of any
operations following an investigation into a major non-compliance.
Refer to Appendix I and II for a flowchart on the complaints process.
4.5.3. Complaints level based on Risk Matrix
The steps of complaints handling, after the complaint has been recorded into the database, is
managed in accordance to the associated risk and complexity of the complaint. The following table
covers the risk aspect:
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 6 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
1 INSIGNIFICANT
Nil or Isolated
complaint.
§ Review and Record the complaint
§ Monitor
2
MINOR Small numbers
of complaints.
§ Review and Record the complaints
§ Assess any trending in context
§ Investigation if similar
§ Determine action
3
MODERATE
Repeated or
clustering of
complaints
§ Review and Record the complaint
§ Review previous complaints of similar context
§ Assess if investigated and what actions took place
§ Conduct an investigation
§ Determine actions and verify previous actions
4
MAJOR Critical
complaints
§ Review and Record the complaint
§ Conduct an investigation
§ Identify the major complaints amongst the group to
determine any trending of similar complaints from
previous reports
§ All regulatory, local or state government or serious
interests to be actioned immediately
§ Prepare meetings with relevant stakeholders to determine
actions for mitigation of the complaints
5
CATASTROPHIC
Significant
Reputation
Damage
§ Review and Record the complaint
§ Conduct an investigation
§ Call emergency meetings with stakeholders, both those
reporting complaints and other external
stakeholders/interested parties
§ Work towards resolving the complaint to rectify reputation
damage.
4.6. Reporting
All complaints shall be reported through to management with major and catastrophic complaints
being reported through to the CEO.
Complaint trends are presented and reviewed by the site management team at quarterly
management reviews.
5. DOCUMENTED INFORMATION
The complaints process shall be reviewed and audited at least once every three years to ensure the
process is compliant and aligns with company objectives.
6. REFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS
Relevant Document/Information Sources Location
Stakeholder and Complaints Management Procedure Controlled Documents
ENV03 Stakeholder and Complaints Management Critical Risk
Standard Controlled Documents
Complaints Register
MYOSH Software (amenity complaints register)
OH&H Management Procedure Controlled Documents
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 7 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
6.7. Legal Requirements and Other Commitments
Mine Safety and Inspection Act 1994
Mine Safety and Inspection Regulations 1995
7. DEFINITIONS
Amenity Complaint All complaints pertaining to the actual operations – noise, dust vibration
Non-amenity
complaint
Complaints as a result of an amenity complaint – property damage; or
pertaining to traffic management, personnel, unresolved issues, etc.
Shire of Capel Local Government Authority in which the operations are located
Noise Dosemeter Equipment for the measurement of noise in decibels
8. APPENDICES
APPENDIX I – Complaints Process Flowchart
APPENDIX II – Complaints Action Flowchart
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 8 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
APPENDIX I – Complaints Decision Process Flowchart
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
STAKEHOLDER COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT (HAREWOODS)
PROCEDURE PROJECTS/PRODUCTION | HAREWOODS
Prepared by: Bronwyn Falconer Document Status: DRAFT Document No: PRJ-009-PRO-233
Approved by: Richard Denby Review Date: 7/12/2019 Revision No: 1.0
Standard Ref: IMS009 Issue Date: 7/12/2016 Page No: 9 of 9
The latest version of this controlled document is available on the Document Control Server as a “PDF” file
This document is uncontrolled in hard copy and may only be edited or amended with permission of the document owner.
APPENDIX II – Complaints Action Flowchart
ATTACHMENT 6 TO ITEM 14.1
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES LICENCE
Clause 3.1(3)(b) Licensee: PIACENTINI & SON PTY LTD
Address: PO Box 308 Bunbury WA 6231
Land Description: Lots 2 and 3 Minninup Road, Stratham
Material to be Excavated: LIMESTONE
Term of Licence: TWO (2) YEARS
Date of Expiry: 24 January 2019
This licence is issued in accordance with the Shire of Capel Extractive Industries Local Laws subject to the following conditions: REFER ATTACHED CONDITIONS Dated this .................................. day of ………………………………….2016 ................................................ Chief Executive Officer SHIRE OF CAPEL
ATTACHMENT 7 TO ITEM 14.1
PIACENTINI & SON PTY LTD
PO Box 308 Bunbury WA 6231
EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY LICENCE CONDITIONS This licence is issued in accordance with the Shire of Capel Extractive Industry (EIL) Local Laws of 2016, subject to the following conditions: Clause 3.1 (3) (a) The Licence period expires on 24 January 2019
Clause 3.1 (4)(a) The payment of an annual licence fee in accordance with the Schedule of Fees and Charges adopted each year in the Shire of Capel annual budget prior to the commencement of sand extraction. Clause 3.1 (5) (a) The extractive industry area shall be limited to the area and levels as
detailed on the approved Development Plan dated 9 September 2016. (b) Access to the site shall be via Harewoods Road. A sealed crossover is to
be constructed and maintained by the licensee to the satisfaction of the Executive Manager of Engineering and Development Services. The internal haul road will be sealed for a minimum distance of 100 metres from the nearest point of Harewoods Road.
(c) Material may be stockpiled on site up to a maximum of 200,000m3 at any
one time and must be stabilised. (d) The hours of operation of the site shall be from 7.00a.m. to 5.00p.m.
Monday to Friday; and 7.00am to 12.00 noon on Saturday. No operations are permitted on Sundays or public holidays.
(e) Processing plant ie; crushing plant or screen plant, may only operate on
the site in accordance with the conditions of an approved Department of Environment Regulation Works Approval or Licence as per the hours stipulated in (d) above
(g) Depth of excavation shall be limited to 7 metres AHD. No over-
excavation below agreed levels is permitted.
ATTACHMENT 7 TO ITEM 14.1
(h) Minimum setbacks for the industry are as follows:
Forty (40) metres from the Harewoods Road and Minninup Road reserve boundaries
Forty (40) metres from the Eastern boundary Twenty (20) metres from the Southern boundary
No operations are permitted within the setback areas. Vegetation is to
be left undisturbed to screen the industry from the road and neighbouring properties.
(i) Safety practices for persons employed or visiting shall be in accordance
with Department of Minerals & Energy, Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 and Regulations 1995.
(j) Precautions against wind blown material shall be made in accordance with
the approved Dust Management Plan. (k) The existing vegetation buffer within the forty metre setback from
Harewoods Road shall be maintained for the period of the licence. (l) Prevention of dieback spread in accordance with DPaW guidelines shall be
made. (m) No discharge of stormwater other than pre-development runoff in defined
natural watercourses will be permitted. (n) Rehabilitation shall be in accordance with the rehabilitation plan contained
within the licence application document dated December 2006. (o) Minimum batters of 1:10 shall be applied to all rehabilitated slopes. (p) A detailed survey of the EIL site shall be submitted to the Shire prior to
16 November each year to allow monitoring of excavation works, annual licence payments and rehabilitation bond adjustments by 31 December of each year.
(q) The licensee to enter into an agreement with the local government by
which it agrees to pay any extraordinary expenses incurred by the local government in repairing damage caused to thoroughfares in the district by heavy or extraordinary traffic conducted by or on behalf of the licensee under the licence.
(s) Access to the extractive industry site shall be available to authorised
officers of the Shire of Capel at all times and without prior notice, for the purpose of inspection and monitoring of compliance with license conditions.
ATTACHMENT 7 TO ITEM 14.1
(t) No soil material to be imported into site without prior approval from the
Executive Manager of Engineering and Development Services. Clause 5 (1) Security for Restoration & Reinstatement The lodgement of a secured amount of $16,326/ha of disturbed land (or an amount as negotiated and adopted each year in Councils Annual Budget – Fees and Charges) is to be lodged prior to the commencement of extraction. This secured amount is to be reviewed annually in terms of Part 5 of the EIL Local Laws.
Clause 6.2
(a) Securely fence the excavation to the satisfaction of the Executive Manager
of Engineering and Development Services.
(b) Erect warning signs at the gate and at intervals of not less than 200 metres around the perimeter of the site, bearing the words, “DANGER EXCAVATIONS KEEP OUT” to the satisfaction of the Executive Manager of Engineering and Development Services.
Clause 7.1 A copy of a current public liability insurance policy for a sum of no less than $10,000,000 in respect of any one claim relating to any of the excavation operations is to be presented prior to the commencement of extraction. This policy is to remain current during the life of the EIL. Advice Note The licensee shall have due respect to the Aboriginal Heritage of the area of the works and all workers shall be briefed accordingly prior to commencement of any works on site. The works may be in proximity of areas that were part of the Aboriginal culture and so there is the possibility that artifacts or remains may be in the area. All workers are to be advised of this possibility. Should the presence of a site of possible significance be discovered or if any artifacts or remains are discovered then any works in the vicinity are to stop immediately and be reported to the Department of Indigenous Affairs. If bones are discovered then police are also to be advised immediately. The Licensee shall note that it is an offence under the WA Aboriginal Heritage Act to interfere with any Aboriginal site unless written permission is obtained from the Minister for Indigenous Affairs.
ATTACHMENT 7 TO ITEM 14.1
ATTACHMENT TO ITEM 14.2
Development Approval - Outbuilding
Attachment 1 Location Plan Attachment 2 Development Plans Attachment 3 Schedule of Submissions Attachment 4 DA supporting information submitted by the applicant
(2 pages)
Plan 1 of 2 Attachment 1 to Item 14.2
Plan 2 of 2 Attachment 1 to Item 14.2
Attachment 2 to Item 14.2
Plan 2 of 2 Attachment 2 to Item 14.2
Attachment 3 to Item 14.2
ELEVATION ATTACHMENT 4 TO ITEM 14.2
