+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers...

Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers...

Date post: 17-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
Banks www.fitchratings.com 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries are at their Support Rating Floor (SRF). Fitch Ratings believes there is an extremely high probability of support from the UK authorities, which hold a 40.2% stake in the bank. UK Franchise Supports VR: Lloyds‟ Viability Rating is underpinned by its extremely strong UK retail and commercial banking franchises, high liquidity buffer and solid capitalisation, but also considers its reliance on wholesale funding and the risks in its real estate loan book. Sustainable Profitability Delayed: Following the rapid integration of HBOS plc and progress in deleveraging, the group reported an operating profit for 2010. However, a return to more sustainable profits has been delayed by the muted UK economic recovery, higher funding costs and continuing asset quality concerns. Lloyds made a small operating loss in 9M11. In addition, a GBP3.2bn exceptional provision in respect of UK payment protection insurance (PPI) redress was taken in Q111 and Lloyds expected GBP260m costs in 2011 for the UK bank levy. Deleveraging Continues: Asset reductions and disposals (largely 600 branches) required by EU state aid approval should not materially harm the group‟s strong franchises, pricing power, economies of scale or savings. Non-core assets fell by 22% in 9M11, to GBP151bn. Strategic Momentum Waning: Since end-Q111, Lloyds has accelerated several initiatives including the repayment of government funding, sale of branches and cost cutting. However, difficult market conditions could delay the implementation of the strategic plan. Asset Quality Stabilising: Asset quality appears to have stabilised (impaired loans were 10.3% at endQ311 and end2010) despite reducing loan book. The quality of the prime mortgage loans is satisfactory, but higher loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages and UK and Irish commercial real estate (CRE) exposures remain a risk. Funding Profile Improving: Despite being the UK‟s largest retail deposit taker, Lloyds has substantial reliance on wholesale funding. Wholesale funding with maturities of over a year has been maintained at 50% at endQ311. Government and central bank facilities have reduced significantly YTD (end-Q311: GBP36.8bn; end-2010: GBP96.6bn) and all mature by end2012. Refinancing requirements and the loans/deposits ratio will fall as the group deleverages. Lloyds‟ extensive franchise and large stock of liquid assets (which exceed the amount of short- term wholesale funding) place it in a solid position. Capital Adequate: In time, retained earnings and deleveraging should strengthen Lloyds‟ Fitch core capital, which mitigates the likely impact of Basel III implementation through deductions of deferred tax assets and equity in insurance operations. What Could Trigger a Rating Action VR on Upward Path: Stronger capital and further progress towards normalised funding, profitability and credit quality could lead to an upgrade of the VR. Downward Pressure on SRF: Downward pressure on SRF and IDRs could increase over time as a result of growing political will as well as regulatory and legislative developments to minimise future support to large banking groups by making them more resolvable. Ratings Lloyds Banking Group plc Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR A Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1 Viability Rating bbb Support Rating 1 Support Rating Floor A Sovereign Risk Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR AAA Long-Term Local-Currency IDR AAA Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1+ Lloyds TSB Bank plc Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR A Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1 Viability Rating bbb Support Rating 1 Support Rating Floor A HBOS plc Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR A Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1 Support Rating 1 Bank of Scotland Plc Foreign-Currency Long-Term IDR A Foreign-Currency Short-Term IDR F1 Support Rating 1 Support Rating Floor A Outlooks All Long-Term IDRs Stable Financial Data Lloyds Banking Group plc 30 Jun 11 31 Dec 10 Total assets (USDm) 1,567,074 1,552,244 Total assets (GBPm) 978,951 991,574 Equity (GBPm) 45,546 46,902 Operating profit (GBPm) -65 734 Published net income (GBPm) -2,278 -258 Comprehensive income (GBPm) -1,492 20 Operating ROAA (%) -0.01 0.07 Operating ROAE (%) -0.29 1.59 Fitch core capital ratio (%) 8.19 8.24 Analysts Svetlana Petrischeva, London +44 20 3530 1182 [email protected] James Longsdon, London +44 20 3530 1076 [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

www.fitchratings.com 17 January 2012

UK

Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report

Key Rating Drivers

Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries are

at their Support Rating Floor (SRF). Fitch Ratings believes there is an extremely high

probability of support from the UK authorities, which hold a 40.2% stake in the bank.

UK Franchise Supports VR: Lloyds‟ Viability Rating is underpinned by its extremely strong UK

retail and commercial banking franchises, high liquidity buffer and solid capitalisation, but also

considers its reliance on wholesale funding and the risks in its real estate loan book.

Sustainable Profitability Delayed: Following the rapid integration of HBOS plc and progress

in deleveraging, the group reported an operating profit for 2010. However, a return to more

sustainable profits has been delayed by the muted UK economic recovery, higher funding costs

and continuing asset quality concerns. Lloyds made a small operating loss in 9M11. In addition,

a GBP3.2bn exceptional provision in respect of UK payment protection insurance (PPI) redress

was taken in Q111 and Lloyds expected GBP260m costs in 2011 for the UK bank levy.

Deleveraging Continues: Asset reductions and disposals (largely 600 branches) required by

EU state aid approval should not materially harm the group‟s strong franchises, pricing power,

economies of scale or savings. Non-core assets fell by 22% in 9M11, to GBP151bn.

Strategic Momentum Waning: Since end-Q111, Lloyds has accelerated several initiatives

including the repayment of government funding, sale of branches and cost cutting. However,

difficult market conditions could delay the implementation of the strategic plan.

Asset Quality Stabilising: Asset quality appears to have stabilised (impaired loans were

10.3% at end‐Q311 and end‐2010) despite reducing loan book. The quality of the prime

mortgage loans is satisfactory, but higher loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages and UK and Irish

commercial real estate (CRE) exposures remain a risk.

Funding Profile Improving: Despite being the UK‟s largest retail deposit taker, Lloyds has

substantial reliance on wholesale funding. Wholesale funding with maturities of over a year has

been maintained at 50% at end‐Q311. Government and central bank facilities have reduced

significantly YTD (end-Q311: GBP36.8bn; end-2010: GBP96.6bn) and all mature by end‐2012.

Refinancing requirements and the loans/deposits ratio will fall as the group de‐leverages.

Lloyds‟ extensive franchise and large stock of liquid assets (which exceed the amount of short-

term wholesale funding) place it in a solid position.

Capital Adequate: In time, retained earnings and de‐leveraging should strengthen Lloyds‟

Fitch core capital, which mitigates the likely impact of Basel III implementation through

deductions of deferred tax assets and equity in insurance operations.

What Could Trigger a Rating Action

VR on Upward Path: Stronger capital and further progress towards normalised funding,

profitability and credit quality could lead to an upgrade of the VR.

Downward Pressure on SRF: Downward pressure on SRF and IDRs could increase over time

as a result of growing political will as well as regulatory and legislative developments to

minimise future support to large banking groups by making them more resolvable.

Ratings

Lloyds Banking Group plc

Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR A Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1 Viability Rating bbb Support Rating 1 Support Rating Floor A

Sovereign Risk Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR AAA Long-Term Local-Currency IDR AAA Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1+

Lloyds TSB Bank plc Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR A Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1 Viability Rating bbb Support Rating 1 Support Rating Floor A

HBOS plc

Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR A Short-Term Foreign-Currency IDR F1 Support Rating 1

Bank of Scotland Plc

Foreign-Currency Long-Term IDR A Foreign-Currency Short-Term IDR F1 Support Rating 1 Support Rating Floor A

Outlooks

All Long-Term IDRs Stable

Financial Data

Lloyds Banking Group plc

30 Jun 11

31 Dec 10

Total assets (USDm) 1,567,074 1,552,244 Total assets (GBPm) 978,951 991,574 Equity (GBPm) 45,546 46,902 Operating profit (GBPm)

-65 734

Published net income (GBPm)

-2,278 -258

Comprehensive income (GBPm)

-1,492 20

Operating ROAA (%) -0.01 0.07 Operating ROAE (%) -0.29 1.59 Fitch core capital ratio (%)

8.19 8.24

Analysts

Svetlana Petrischeva, London +44 20 3530 1182 [email protected] James Longsdon, London +44 20 3530 1076 [email protected]

Page 2: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 2

Profile

Lloyds was formed in January 2009 when Lloyds TSB acquired HBOS and its subsidiaries. The

group is now one of the UK‟s largest providers of retail financial services, including insurance.

Lloyds had market shares of 22% of gross new residential mortgages in 2010 and 20% in

customer deposits, making it the largest bank by market share in the UK.

Recent History

HBOS had a large exposure to CRE and a dependency on wholesale funding. In September

2008, as concerns over wholesale funding were magnified after the default of Lehman Brothers

and the prospects for CRE looked bleak, Lloyds agreed to acquire HBOS. In January 2009,

Lloyds received GBP17bn of capital from the UK authorities, of which GBP11.5bn of capital

was made available to HBOS on condition that the acquisition completed.

In view of the size of the potential losses at HBOS, in March 2009 Lloyds agreed to discuss

participation in the UK government‟s asset protection scheme (GAPS), designed to insure

Lloyds against losses on GBP260bn of identified assets. Legal and operational complexities

meant that the scheme had not been introduced by September 2009, when the threat of

crippling losses had receded and equity and debt investors were more confident about the

prospects for Lloyds. As a result, Lloyds withdrew from the planned scheme.

In December 2009, Lloyds successfully raised GBP13.5bn of equity and, in a debt exchange,

raised GBP9bn of enhanced capital notes, which would convert into equity if the bank‟s core

Tier 1 capital ratio fell below 5%.

On 1 January 2010, Lloyds adjusted its structure so that HBOS and its subsidiaries are held by

Lloyds TSB, the operating entity, rather than Lloyds Banking Group plc, the ultimate holding

company. Lloyds operates by means of several subsidiaries and brands, including Lloyds TSB,

Halifax, Bank of Scotland, Cheltenham & Gloucester, Scottish Widows and Clerical Medical.

Strategy

Lloyds is active in retail and commercial lending in the UK, financed mainly by customer

deposits and long-term wholesale funding. Historically, Lloyds has operated with good levels of

cost efficiency, low risks and resilient profitability. Lloyds is restructuring HBOS‟s operations by

applying its own risk appetite, lending and provisioning policies.

With the arrival of a new chief executive in 2011, the strategy was reinvigorated to continue the

de-risking and deleveraging, simplify the group structure and increase efficiency, consolidate its

already strong retail and commercial banking franchises and strengthen the balance sheet and

liquidity position. The plans include the annual investment of up to GBP500m to 2014 to

invigorate the Halifax brand, deepen relationships with clients and develop the bancassurance

proposition. The plan also aims to generate sustainable annual cost savings of GBP1.7bn in

2014 on top of the GBP2bn integration synergies by end-2011.

Lloyds targets a loans/deposits ratio below 130% (120% for core business) by end-2014, a

ROE between 12.5% - 14.5% and a core Tier 1 capital ratio above 10% in 2013 when Basel III

transition commences.

Disposals

As part of its review of state aid received by Lloyds in 2009, the European Commission

required Lloyds to dispose of a standalone UK banking business by end-November 2013. The

business for disposal consists of a retail banking business with over 600 branches, a 4.6%

share of the personal current accounts market in the UK and approximately 19% of the group‟s

mortgage assets. The business would consist of the TSB brand, the branches, savings

accounts and branch-based mortgages of Cheltenham & Gloucester, the branches and branch-

based customers of Lloyds TSB Scotland and a related banking licence, additional Lloyds TSB

Figure 1

Retail

29%

Wealth

and Int'l

15%

RWAs by DivisionAs at H111

Source: Fitch

Group operations

and central Items

4%

Wholesale

45%

Commercial

7%

Related Criteria

Global Financial Institutions Ratings Criteria (August 2011)

Leading market shares in UK retail

and commercial banking.

Integration of HBOS almost

complete.

Page 3: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 3

branches and branch-based customers in England and Wales and Intelligent Finance. In

December 2011 Lloyds announced The Co-operative Group to be a preferred bidder for the

transaction, Lloyds aims to agree heads of terms by end-Q112.

Lloyds expects to identify a disposal option (preferred buyer or IPO) by end-2011 allowing

sufficient time for the lengthy separation process. The Independent Commission on Banking

did not recommend additional branch disposals. Based on 2008 data, the bank calculates that

these disposals would cause its pre-tax profit to decline by around GBP500m.

Other state aid requirements included an asset reduction programme, agreement from Lloyds

to not make certain acquisitions and not to make discretionary payments of coupons or to

exercise voluntary call options on hybrid securities from 31 January 2010 until 31 January 2012.

The non-payment of coupons on hybrid securities prevents Lloyds from paying dividends on

ordinary shares in the same period.

Presentation of Accounts

Lloyds TSB and HBOS presented end-2008 accounts separately and the new holding company,

Lloyds, presented interim accounts for the first time at end-June 2009. Although some

comparative figures are available, statutory 2008 accounts are not comparable with 2009 data.

Performance

The improvements in performance in 2010 enabled Lloyds to report a small operating profit for

the period but performance have been under more pressure in 2011. Net interest margins

(NIM) widened in 2010, thanks to many mortgage borrowers reverting to higher standard

variable rates and the re-pricing of wholesale loans. However, NIM narrowed slightly in 9M11

as these benefits were more than offset by higher funding costs. Combined with a reduction in

loan balances through continued deleveraging, net interest revenue was lower. The subdued

UK economy also resulted in lower other income. Revenue growth is likely to be lacklustre in

light of these challenges.

In 2010, Lloyds‟ performance benefitted from a diminishing flow of impaired loans and hence a

significant reduction in loan impairment charges (LICs). Although the reduction in LIC continued

in 9M11, the pace of improvement is slowing. LICs are likely to remain moderately elevated

considering the economic outlook. Costs (excluding one-offs, see below) are well controlled.

On a combined business basis (ie, excluding amortisation of intangibles arising from HBOS

acquisition, insurance business volatility, integration costs and other one-offs), operating costs

were down 3% yoy in 9M11. With HBOS integration almost complete, Lloyds is starting to

benefit from the cost synergies (GBP2bn annually by end-2011).

On a statutory basis, Lloyds made an operating loss in 9M11, as improvements in LIC and

operating costs were not sufficient to offset the revenue pressures. In addition, there were

some one-off provisions/costs, the largest being GBP3.2bn for PPI redress (included as a non-

recurring expense in the attached Income Statement). Other one-offs included a GBP175m

provision in relation to German insurance litigation and GBP976m integration and simplification

costs. Lloyds expected to take a GBP260m charge in Q411 for the 2011 UK bank levy.

The table below (Figure 2) shows the contribution of each of the main operating divisions to

pre-tax profit in H111. These figures are not prepared on the same basis as the statutory

accounts.

NIM under pressure from higher

funding costs.

2011 results affected by GBP3.2bn

PPI redress provisions.

Fair value unwind, the insurance

operations and integration and

disposal costs add volatility to

statutory results.

One-off costs likely to remain a

feature in the near-term from

evolving regulation and as the

strategic review is implemented.

Page 4: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 4

Prospects

A return to more sustainable profitability is likely to be delayed by the muted UK economic

recovery, prolonged low interest rate environment, higher funding costs and continuing asset

quality concerns. In the near term, Lloyds‟ performance will continue to suffer from still

meaningful, but slowly decreasing, LICs. There are also likely to be further charges relating to

the simplification of the group under the new strategic initiatives.

Management has recently noted that the attainment of some of Lloyds‟ medium-term financial

targets, principally the income related metrics, may be delayed to beyond 2014 if weak

economic conditions persist. However, in the medium term, the underlying picture should be

one of reductions in costs and a return to increasing efficiency and profitability as the group

develops its deep franchise, multiple brands, economies of scale and pricing power. Lloyds has

the capacity to extract more value from its leading UK franchise. However, the limited exposure

to international and investment banking business means that returns are not as geographically

or operationally diversified as some national and international peers.

Risk Management

Lloyds‟ approach to risk is in line with legacy Lloyds TSB, which was more conservative,

relationship focused and with risk managed through the cycle. As part of the integration with

HBOS, risk appetite, monitoring and controls have been aligned and further developed where

required by the larger and more specialised nature of the combined group. Lloyds uses stress

tests and other possible outcomes to calculate potential levels of LICs and to manage risk

exposures.

Although some portfolios are being run down, given the nature of some of the non-core assets,

it will be some time before the group‟s exposure has been fully adjusted to this more

conservative approach. New management has reviewed higher risk loans in the wholesale

portfolio to identify and improve management of problematic assets. Lloyds has expanded a

business support unit (BSU) to manage distressed assets, maximise recovery and minimise

impairments.

Credit Risk

Fitch believes credit risk to be the largest risk in the bank. Lloyds incurred large LICs, mainly

against legacy HBOS assets in H109. Since then, LICs have fallen each half year as the UK

economy has improved. Given the current uncertain economic outlook, LICs are likely to

remain high, in Fitch‟s view.

Retail

Unsecured loans, mainly personal loans and credit cards, form a small part of the book but

generate larger LICs and are more susceptible to rise in employment than the residential

mortgages which dominate the book. Management expects improvements in the asset quality

following tighter underwriting, portfolio management actions and write-downs taken.

Figure 2 Lloyds Combined Businesses Profitability by Division (H111)

(GBPm) Retail Wholesale Commercial Insurance Wealth &

international

Group operations and

central items Total

Pre-impairment operating profit 2,826 1,426 396 564 348 -714 4,846 Loan impairment charges -1,173 -1,557 -160 0 -2,532 0 -5,422 Share of results of joint ventures and associates 3 9 0 0 0 0 12 Operating profit 1,656 -122 236 564 -2,184 -714 -564 Fair value unwind 544 1,551 26 -21 104 -536 1,668 Profit before tax 2,200 1,429 262 543 -2,080 -1,250 1,104 Memo: Gross loans (GBPbn) 358 130 29 n.a. 51 1 568

Source: Lloyds 2011 interim results news release

Figure 3

02468

1012

YE07 YE08 YE09 YE10 Q211

0

2

4

6

Impaired loans (LHS)

Impairment charge (RHS)

Reserves for impaired loans (RHS)

Credit Quality (As % of

Gross Loans)

(%)

Source: Fitch

(%)

Major credit risk reduction

programme.

Still significant credit risks but

emergence of impaired loans

slowing.

Market risks small and controlled.

Page 5: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 5

Figure 4 Lloyds Retail Loans at End-June 2011

(GBPbn) Loans Impaired loans Impaired

loans/loans (%) Impairment allowances

Impairment allowances/loans (%)

Secured 336,446 6,695 2.0 1,697 25.3 Unsecured 25,995 2,695 10.4 1,306 48.5 Total 362,441 9,390 2.6 3,003 32.0

Source: Lloyds 2011 interim results news release

HBOS contributed a large UK residential mortgage exposure to the existing significant

exposure of Lloyds TSB. This has resulted in around 22% of Lloyds‟ mortgage portfolio being

riskier buy-to-let and self-certified loans and contributed to the higher LTVs (25% of mortgages

have greater than 90% LTV). However, only 0.9% of all mortgages in negative equity at end-

Q311 were more than three months in arrears.

House prices fell on average to almost 20% below their peak values, but have since recovered

to about 10% below, which has contained losses on a decreasing flow of repossessions.

Recent data suggest a stabilisation of prices, with a risk of a fall as mortgage finance remains

tight, while the supply of properties for sale rises. Losses on residential mortgages in the UK so

far have been smaller than many expected, thanks to the low interest rates, forbearance and

unemployment hitting non-mortgage borrowers (the young and those close to retirement)

hardest. However, impairments may increase if the economic situation deteriorates.

Figure 6 Lloyds Residential Mortgage Loans at End-June 2011

(GBPbn) Loans 3+ months in arrears

Mortgage balances (%)

Loans with loan to value in excess of 100%

Mainstream 260,805 6,056 2.3 10.6 Buy to let 47,272 1,163 2.5 16.4 Specialist 28,369 2,416 8.5 19.4 Total 336,446 9,635 2.9 12.2

Source: Lloyds 2011 interim results news release

Wholesale and Commercial

The largest contributor to LICs is the wholesale book. Within this, the largest credit losses were

from legacy HBOS‟s CRE activities, where exposures involve the whole spectrum of financing

from capital to debt, a risky form of activity not undertaken by legacy Lloyds TSB. The HBOS

acquisition also introduced single-name concentrations as well as increasing the property bias

of the group‟s portfolio.

Figure 7 Lloyds Wholesale Loans at End-June 2011

(GBPbn) Loans Impaired

loans

Impaired loans/loans

(%) Impairment allowances

Impairment allowances/loans

(%)

Corporate 73,760 5,750 7.8 3,252 56.6 Commercial real estate BSU 23,673 16,212 68.5 6,263 38.6 Wholesale equity 140 114 81.4 110 96.5 Wholesale markets 36,843 5,561 15.1 2,177 39.1 Treasury and trading 1,021 0 0 0 0 Asset finance 8,546 1,612 18.9 1,009 62.6 Total 143,983 29,249 20.3 17,777 43.8

Source: Lloyds 2011 interim results news release

The UK CRE market remains sluggish and refinancing options are limited. Increased tenant

defaults, more likely in a prolonged economic downturn, could also exacerbate problems.

Development loans formed a small minority of lending. Overall, Fitch considers that while the

volume of CRE loans is likely to remain meaningful, the level of impairment allowances should

prove adequate. Lloyds has been able to sell some properties close to or slightly above the

Figure 5 Loan Book (End-H111) (GBPm) (%)

Retail 362,441 58.4 Wholesale 143,983 23.2 Commercial 29,694 4.8 Wealth & int‟l 64,119 10.3 Hedging & other 20,176 3.3 Gross loans 620,413 100.0 Provisions -29,571- FV adjustments -2,999 Net loans 587,843

Source: Lloyds, Fitch

Page 6: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 6

marked-down value, although these have mostly been in primary locations. Prospects are

linked broadly to the recovery of the UK economy.

Lloyds‟ other wholesale loans present fewer risks, although the risks may materialise later than

those in CRE. These risks may be highest in the legacy HBOS mid-sized corporate book,

which was characterised by individual concentrations and higher risk borrowers. Wholesale

equity comprises corporate equity, while wholesale markets comprise acquisition finance and

project finance loans. Many transactions have been restructured and Lloyds expects to exit

from all but project finance and development finance, allowing the portfolio to decline. The

current fragile recovery means that a portion of the exposures remain vulnerable.

The commercial loan book focuses on SME lending. At end-H111, 10.1% of the book was

impaired and provision reserve coverage was 31.2%. Given the subdued UK economic

environment, LICs are likely to remain high for this book.

Wealth and International

Figure 8 Lloyds Wealth and International Loans at End-June 2011

(GBPbn) Loans Impaired

loans Impaired

loans/loans (%) Impairment allowances

Impairment allowances/loans (%)

Wealth 9,226 434 4.7 125 28.8 Ireland 27,574 17,672 64.1 9,858 55.8 Australia 12,915 4,540 35.2 2,295 50.6 Wholesale Europe 6,956 952 13.7 429 45.1 Other 7,448 238 3.2 117 49.2 Total 64,119 23,836 37.2 12,824 53.8

Source: Lloyds 2011 interim results news release

Lloyds‟ wealth and international portfolio consists mainly of loans to Irish and Australian

borrowers. The group‟s Irish portfolio is heavily exposed to commercial real estate where large

price falls have led to significant losses. There is little liquidity in the market and economic

uncertainty has led to worsening problems. Impaired loans and impairment allowances

continue to increase. Lloyds has also made large impairment charges against its Australian

portfolio. Australia has suffered less from the economic downturn, but concentrated property

investment loans and loans to other sectors at risk resulted in a high level of impaired loans.

Other Earning Assets

At end-Q3111, Lloyds reported GBP144bn of trading and other assets at fair value through

profit or loss (down from GBP155bn at end-H111), GBP66bn of derivative assets and

GBP36bn of available for sale (AFS) assets. The asset at fair value through profit and loss

relate primarily to the insurance business (GBP130bn at end-H111) where most of the

investment risk is borne by policyholders. There is some residual risk in Lloyds‟ treasury

securities portfolio, but earlier write-downs and fair valuations, make further large devaluations

more limited.

Lloyds has significantly reduced its credit market exposures (largely inherited from HBOS) to

GBP20bn (end-2010: GBP35bn; end-2009: GBP43bn, see Figure 9). This included GBP15bn

accounted for as loans in the wholesale portfolio and GBP5bn trading and AFS assets. Just

under 90% of debt securities are rated „A‟ or better. Lloyds wrote down to fair value many of

these securities on acquisition of HBOS, which continues to provide protection against potential

losses. Lloyds‟ policy is to reduce the size of the portfolio, selling especially where there is risk

of loss.

With the exception of retail and corporate lending in Ireland, the group has minimal exposure to

Belgium, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain (see Figure 10). Over 40% of banking

group exposures are covered bonds and the remainder is largely short-term exposures. For

ABS exposures, just less than half are AFS securities, with the remainder held as loans.

Figure 9 Credit Market Exposures at End-June 2011

(GBPm) Net

exposure

US residential 4,125 Non-US residential 5,194 Commercial 2,254 Total mortgage-backed securities

11,573

Collateralised debt obligations

2316

Federal family education loan programme student loans (FFELP)

4,176

Personal sector 1117 Other asset-backed securities

680

Total uncovered asset-backed securities

19,862

Negative basisa 205

Total wholesale asset-backed securities (ABS)

20,067

a Negative basis means bonds held with

separate matching credit default swap (CDS) protection. Source: Lloyds 2011 interim results news release

Page 7: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 7

Market Risk

Lloyds is primarily a commercial bank and as such takes limited market risk. Most of Lloyds‟

market risk arises from structural rather than trading risks. Market risk is managed with

scenarios and stress tests, value at risk and potential impact on profit before tax. Management

has limited appetite for market risk, has good controls and is progressively reducing the credit

market exposures.

The group‟s large (GBP91bn at end-H111) exposure to equities is composed largely of policy

holders‟ direct holdings and the balance is chiefly the insurance company‟s own equities‟

exposure. This balance nevertheless contributes a material portion of potential losses in a

stress scenario and management is exploring ways of reducing it. The largest other market

risks generated by the balance sheet include basis risk, interest rate risk and credit spread risk,

for which Lloyds has a conservative appetite.

Operational Risk

The simplification programme as part of the strategic review initiatives increases the risk of

operational losses. However, the experience of the HBOS integration should decrease the

likelihood of material loss. As retail banking tends to have frequent but small operational losses,

Lloyds may be less exposed to the risk of large operational losses than investment banks

where losses tend to be rarer and larger.

Funding, Liquidity and Capital

Funding

Lloyds has the largest customer deposit base in the UK (GBP397bn excluding repos at end-

Q311). However, its GBP557bn loan book (excluding reverse repos) requires substantial

wholesale funding. The group reduces this gap through deleveraging and deposits growth; it

targets a loans/deposits ratio below 130% by end-2014 (end-Q311: 140%, end-2010: 154%;

end-2009: 169%). In 9M11, the group grew customer deposits by 4% and reduced customer

loans by 5%, achieving a GBP16bn reduction in wholesale funding to GBP282bn at end-Q311.

Lloyds‟ wholesale funding is relatively well diversified by source (see Figure 11). The

repayment of government and central-bank facilities was accelerated since March 2011 and

usage has decreased significantly (end-Q311: GBP36.8bn; end-2010: GBP96.6bn; end-2009:

GBP157.2bn, including UK Special Liquidity Facility accounted off-balance sheet). The

remainder mature by end-2012.

Lloyds has been issuing in excess of its funding plans (around GBP20bn-25bn of long-term

debt a year) to help accelerate the repayment of government and central bank facilities. In

2010, the group issued GBP50bn term funding. Despite the challenging market during parts of

2011, Lloyds had issued GBP33.6bn of term funding in 10M11, including GBP3bn in October.

Consistent with market trends secured funding accounted for a relatively high 64% of this

issuance (GBP21.4bn). Private placement accounted for 28% (GBP9.5bn) of issuance in

10M11.

Figure 10 Exposures to Selected Eurozone Countries (End-Q311) (GBPm) Belgium Greece Ireland Italy Portugal Spain Total

Direct sovereign 87 - - 52 - 40 179 Central bank deposits 5 - - - - 31 36 Banking groups 309 - 346 1,226 185 2,063 4,129 ABS - 61 329 44 369 408 1,211 Financial assets held for trading 1 - 1 295 16 106 419 Assets held by insurance business 270 - 81 99 - 81 531 Corporate exposures 451 557 8,646 65 104 1,816 11,639 Retail exposures - - 6,453 - 9 1,692 8,154 Total 1,123 618 15,856 1,781 683 6,237 26,298

Source: Lloyds, Fitch

Government and central bank

funding significantly reduced.

Moderate reliance on wholesale

funding.

Contingent funding supported by

large volumes of high quality liquid

assets.

Capital acceptable and likely to

strengthen through deleveraging.

Page 8: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 8

Liquidity

Half of wholesale funding at end-Q311 (ie, GBP141bn) had maturities less than 12 months,

including GBP80bn of money market funding (commercial paper (CP), certificates of deposit

(CDs), asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) and interbank deposits). In addition, GBP28bn

of wholesale funding had maturities between one and two years.

Lloyds‟ substantial short-term wholesale funding requirements in volatile funding markets

remain a point to watch. However, the bank‟s extensive franchise and large stock of liquid

assets (which exceed the amount of short-term wholesale funding) place it in a solid position.

Lloyds had GBP220bn of unencumbered liquid assets at end-Q311 including GBP97bn of FSA

eligible assets (cash, gilts, US treasuries and Euro AAA government securities) and GBP123bn

of secondary liquidity (highly rated securities including self-issuance).

Lloyds regularly runs various stress tests, including idiosyncratic and system-wide scenarios.

Management‟s projections show the group will achieve the proposed Basel III liquidity and

funding metrics in advance of expected implementation dates.

Capital

Lloyds exchanged some hybrid instruments for ordinary shares in 2010 which was a major

reason for a GBP1.6bn increase in its core Tier 1 (CT1) capital during the period. At the same

time, risk weighted assets (RWAs) fell by 18% reflecting deleveraging efforts and the change in

the methodology. Hence, Lloyds‟ CT1 ratio strengthened materially to 10.2% at end-2010 from

8.1% at end-2009. A further 9% reduction in RWAs in 9M11 offset the effect of the statutory

loss reported for the period with the CT1 ratio remaining broadly stable (10.3% at end-Q311).

Lloyds announced a tender offer for its lower tier 2 (LT2) securities on 1 December 2011

(offering to exchange them at a discount for more attractively priced LT2 securities) which is

likely to have a positive effect on its CT1 capital position due to accounting effect.

Lloyds targets a CT1 capital ratio greater than 10% after the start of Basel III transition period in

2013. Lloyds‟ focus on retail and commercial banking should mean that it faces less serious

challenges than its peers with sizable investment banking operations in adapting to Basel III‟s

challenging capital requirements. Tougher capital requirements for ownership of insurance

operations are likely, however, to weigh on the CT1 ratio. Management expects the

implementation of CRD 2/3 to have a negative effect of about 0.8% on Lloyds‟ CT1 ratio by

end-2013 (before insurance deduction is applied from 2014). Lloyds repatriated GBP1.5bn of

equity from its insurance subsidiaries in 2010 (including GBP0.8bn through exchange of equity

into subordinated debt) and completed further insurance capital restructurings in July 2011

(which will reduce CT1 deduction under Basel III by just over GBP2bn).

The Fitch core capital ratio, which is calculated after deductions for deferred tax assets and

equity in insurance subsidiaries, was an adequate 8.2% at end-H111. Lloyds‟ de-risking and

deleveraging actions make it well placed to meet new regulatory requirements amid a more

difficult environment for internal capital generation. However, Fitch‟s core capital ratio is

unlikely to improve meaningfully until the group starts generating sustainable profits.

Hybrid Instruments

As part of its capital raising measures in 2009, Lloyds exchanged certain Tier 1 and Upper Tier

2 securities into enhanced capital notes (ECNs), which constitute Lower Tier 2 debt under

normal circumstances but automatically convert entirely to equity as soon as Lloyds reports a

core Tier 1 ratio below 5%. This provides Lloyds with EUR9bn of contingency capital, equal to

2% of RWA. However, given the developments in regulation, these ECNs are unlikely to ever

be converted since the trigger point is so low.

Following European Commission state aid requirements, Lloyds will not pay coupons on certain

Tier 1 and Upper Tier 2 securities for a period of two years from 31 January 2010. As a result,

the bank will not pay any dividends in this period on its ordinary shares. Management has

Figure 11 LBG: Sources of Funding at End-June 2011 (GBPbn) H111 2010 2009

Retail deposits

242.3 235.6 224.1

Corporate deposits

152.6 146.9 147.1

Customer repos

5.0 11.1 35.5

Bank repos 9.4 24.0 27.6 Deposits by banks

21.9 26.4 48.6

CDs/CPs 73.7 74.9 85.9 Covered bonds

39.1 32.1 28.1

Securitisation

37.1 39.0 35.8

Debt under CGS

37.1 45.4 50.0

Senior debt 49.5 42.3 89.7 Subordinated debt

37.2 37.9 37.4

Derivatives 36.1 42.2 40.5 Trading 27.3 26.8 28.3 Other 52.8 51.4 46.3 Accounting adjust

-6.9 -6.5 -2.4

Total 814 829 922

Other include: Liabilities arising from non-participating investment contracts Source: Lloyds, Fitch

Page 9: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 9

stated it intends to be in a position to recommence payment of coupons and dividends on these

hybrid capital securities after 31 January 2012.

Holding Company Analysis

At end-2010, Lloyds reported GBP37bn of equity at the parent company (compared with

GBP46bn at group level). The holding company itself does not undertake any activity other

than investment in its regulated operating subsidiaries. Its investment in its subsidiaries was

GBP38bn, hence double leverage is very limited (with a double leverage ratio of 103%).

However, the larger equity base at group level indicates that some debt at the holding company

was injected into group subsidiaries as capital.

The change in company structure on 1 January 2010 saw GBP9bn of enhanced capital notes

transferred to the parent company, increasing its burden of coupon payments, while all

preference shares and almost all other dated and undated securities were transferred to

banking subsidiaries. Fitch considers that the current extent of double leverage is acceptable.

Page 10: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 10

Figure 12 Peer Comparison

Lloyds Banking Group plc (GBPm)

‘A’/Stable/‘bbb’

The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc

(GBPm)

‘A’/Stable/‘bbb’

Santander UK plc (GBPm)

‘A+’/Stable/‘a+’

Nationwide Building Society

(GBPm)

‘A+’/Negative/‘a+’

Q311 2010 2009 Q311 2010 H111 2010 H112 FY11

Total assets (GBPm) 984,081 991,574 1,027,255 2,507,374 1,453,576 313,054 302,860 193,882 188,878 Total equity (GBPm) 46,325 46,902 44,107 113,345 70,622 11,346 11,380 6,077 6,254 Net interest income 9,933 12,546 9,026 9,605 14,209 1,981 3,814 783 1,541 Net fees and commission income 2,176 2,733 2,737 3,907 5,982 432 699 222 436 Other operating income 3,001 9,677 10,017 5,476.0 6,092.0 254 370 72.0 125.0 Non-interest operating costs 9,772 13,270 15,984 13,459 18,218 1,128 2,197 683 1,331 Loan impairment charge 6,017 10,771 16,028 5,747 9,256 259 712 144 359 Other impairment charges n.a. 181 645 1,044 n.a. n.a. n.a. 6 66 Operating profit 679 734 -10,877 -1,262 -1,191 1,280 2,086 244 346 Non-operating income and expenses 3,179 453 11,919 2,472 792 -731 - -6 -29 Pre-tax profit 3,858 281 1,042 1,210 -399 549 2,086 238 317 Taxes and discontinued operations 1,079 539 1,911 1,399 1,267 136 581 50 69 Net income 2,779 258 2,953 -189 -1,666 413 1,583 188 248 Net interest margin (%) na 1.34 1.16 0.94 1.47 1.47 1.41 0.85 0.84 Cost/income (%) 64.67 53.17 73.39 70.88 69.31 42.29 44.99 63.42 63.32 Pre-impairment operating ROAA (%) 0.73 1.15 0.69 0.5 0.48 1.01 0.96 0.41 0.41 Operating ROAA (%) -0.09 0.07 -1.29 -0.11 -0.07 0.84 0.71 0.25 0.18 Operating ROAE (%) -1.98 1.59 -36.73 -2.38 -1.55 24.77 25.48 7.89 5.82 Regulatory core tier 1 (%) 10.3 10.2 8.1 11.3 10.7 11.4 11.5 12.7 12.5 Regulatory tier 1 capital (%) 11.9 11.6 9.6 13.8 12.9 14.7 14.8 16.1 15.7 Regulatory total capital (%) 15.3 15.2 12.4 14.7 14 20.4 20.6 19.9 19.5 Fitch core capital/RWA (%) n.a. 8.24 5.91 7.79 6.69 12.26 11.96 12.04 11.62 Equity/assets (%) 4.71 4.73 4.29 4.52 4.86 3.62 3.76 3.13 3.31 Impaired/total loans (%) 10.56 10.38 9.01 7.63 6.73 1.13 1.14 2.02 1.95 Loan impairment cover (%) n.a. 45.87 44.17 48.21 46.78 70.52 71.65 25.33 26.14 Loan impairment charge/avg. gross loans (%)

1.33 1.69 3.04 1.35 1.48 0.26 0.36 0.19 0.24

Loan/deposit ratio (%) 140.47 154.12 168.62 111.97 117.30 132.88 132.5 115.31 116.77 a Financial year end on 4 April

Source: Companies‟ accounts adapted by Fitch

Page 11: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 11

Lloyds Banking Group plc

Income Statement

6 Months - Interim 6 Months - Interim As % of Year End As % of Year End As % of Year End As % of

USDm GBPm Earning GBPm Earning GBPm Earning GBPm Earning

Unaudited Unaudited Assets Unqualified Assets Unqualified Assets Unqualified Assets

1. Interest Income on Loans n.a. n.a. - 26,085.0 2.86 25,023.0 2.62 15,716.0 3.75

2. Other Interest Income 21,509.5 13,437.0 3.08 3,255.0 0.36 3,215.0 0.34 1,853.0 0.44

3. Dividend Income n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

4. Gross Interest and Dividend Income 21,509.5 13,437.0 3.08 29,340.0 3.21 28,238.0 2.96 17,569.0 4.20

5. Interest Expense on Customer Deposits n.a. n.a. - 5,381.0 0.59 4,410.0 0.46 4,932.0 1.18

6. Other Interest Expense 11,922.5 7,448.0 1.71 11,413.0 1.25 14,802.0 1.55 4,919.0 1.18

7. Total Interest Expense 11,922.5 7,448.0 1.71 16,794.0 1.84 19,212.0 2.02 9,851.0 2.35

8. Net Interest Income 9,587.0 5,989.0 1.37 12,546.0 1.37 9,026.0 0.95 7,718.0 1.84

9. Net Gains (Losses) on Trading and Derivatives 4,991.2 3,118.0 0.71 15,724.0 1.72 19,098.0 2.00 -9,186.0 -2.19

10. Net Gains (Losses) on Other Securities n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

11. Net Gains (Losses) on Assets at FV through Income Statement n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

12. Net Insurance Income -1,959.3 -1,224.0 -0.28 -10,363.0 -1.14 -13,073.0 -1.37 8,271.0 1.98

13. Net Fees and Commissions 2,341.9 1,463.0 0.34 2,733.0 0.30 2,737.0 0.29 2,537.0 0.61

14. Other Operating Income 2,414.0 1,508.0 0.35 4,316.0 0.47 3,992.0 0.42 532.0 0.13

15. Total Non-Interest Operating Income 7,787.7 4,865.0 1.12 12,410.0 1.36 12,754.0 1.34 2,154.0 0.51

16. Personnel Expenses 5,076.0 3,171.0 0.73 5,469.0 0.60 6,675.0 0.70 2,931.0 0.70

17. Other Operating Expenses 5,213.7 3,257.0 0.75 7,801.0 0.85 9,309.0 0.98 3,252.0 0.78

18. Total Non-Interest Expenses 10,289.7 6,428.0 1.47 13,270.0 1.45 15,984.0 1.68 6,183.0 1.48

19. Equity-accounted Profit/ Loss - Operating n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

20. Pre-Impairment Operating Profit 7,085.0 4,426.0 1.01 11,686.0 1.28 5,796.0 0.61 3,689.0 0.88

21. Loan Impairment Charge 7,112.2 4,443.0 1.02 10,771.0 1.18 16,028.0 1.68 2,876.0 0.69

22. Securities and Other Credit Impairment Charges 76.8 48.0 0.01 181.0 0.02 645.0 0.07 6.0 0.00

23. Operating Profit -104.0 -65.0 -0.01 734.0 0.08 -10,877.0 -1.14 807.0 0.19

24. Equity-accounted Profit/ Loss - Non-operating 22.4 14.0 0.00 -88.0 -0.01 -752.0 -0.08 n.a. -

25. Non-recurring Income n.a. n.a. - n.a. - 12,671.0 1.33 0.0 0.00

26. Non-recurring Expense 5,122.5 3,200.0 0.73 365.0 0.04 n.a. - n.a. -

27. Change in Fair Value of Own Debt n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

28. Other Non-operating Income and Expenses n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

29. Pre-tax Profit -5,204.1 -3,251.0 -0.75 281.0 0.03 1,042.0 0.11 807.0 0.19

30. Tax expense -1,557.5 -973.0 -0.22 539.0 0.06 -1,911.0 -0.20 -38.0 -0.01

31. Profit/Loss from Discontinued Operations n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

32. Net Income -3,646.6 -2,278.0 -0.52 -258.0 -0.03 2,953.0 0.31 845.0 0.20

33. Change in Value of AFS Investments 672.3 420.0 0.10 493.0 0.05 2,248.0 0.24 399.0 0.10

34. Revaluation of Fixed Assets n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

35. Currency Translation Differences -123.3 -77.0 -0.02 -129.0 -0.01 -219.0 -0.02 1.0 0.00

36. Remaining OCI Gains/(losses) 709.1 443.0 0.10 -86.0 -0.01 -290.0 -0.03 n.a. -

37. Fitch Comprehensive Income -2,388.3 -1,492.0 -0.34 20.0 0.00 4,692.0 0.49 1,245.0 0.30

38. Memo: Profit Allocation to Non-controlling Interests 43.2 27.0 0.01 62.0 0.01 126.0 0.01 26.0 0.01

39. Memo: Net Income after Allocation to Non-controlling Interests -3,689.8 -2,305.0 -0.53 -320.0 -0.04 2,827.0 0.30 819.0 0.20

40. Memo: Common Dividends Relating to the Period 0.0 0.0 0.00 47.0 0.01 0.0 0.00 2,042.0 0.49

41. Memo: Preferred Dividends Related to the Period 0.0 0.0 0.00 n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Exchange rate

31 Dec 2009

USD1 = GBP0.61748

31 Dec 2008

USD1 = GBP0.68597

30 Jun 2011

USD1 = GBP0.62470

31 Dec 2010

USD1 = GBP0.63880

Page 12: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 12

Lloyds Banking Group plc

Balance Sheet

6 Months - Interim 6 Months - Interim As % of Year End As % of Year End As % of Year End As % of

USDm GBPm Assets GBPm Assets GBPm Assets GBPm Assets

AssetsA. Loans

1. Residential Mortgage Loans 566,230.2 353,724.0 36.13 356,261.0 35.93 362,667.0 35.30 114,643.0 26.29

2. Other Mortgage Loans n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

3. Other Consumer/ Retail Loans 51,948.1 32,452.0 3.31 36,967.0 3.73 42,958.0 4.18 25,318.0 5.81

4. Corporate & Commercial Loans 330,246.5 206,305.0 21.07 202,243.0 20.40 229,315.0 22.32 96,428.0 22.11

5. Other Loans 39,912.0 24,933.0 2.55 26,761.0 2.70 18,017.0 1.75 9,915.0 2.27

6. Less: Reserves for Impaired Loans/ NPLs 47,336.3 29,571.0 3.02 29,635.0 2.99 25,988.0 2.53 3,569.0 0.82

7. Net Loans 941,000.5 587,843.0 60.05 592,597.0 59.76 626,969.0 61.03 242,735.0 55.67

8. Gross Loans 988,336.8 617,414.0 63.07 622,232.0 62.75 652,957.0 63.56 246,304.0 56.49

9. Memo: Impaired Loans included above 104,799.1 65,468.0 6.69 64,606.0 6.52 58,833.0 5.73 8,542.0 1.96

10. Memo: Loans at Fair Value included above n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

B. Other Earning Assets

1. Loans and Advances to Banks 45,093.6 28,170.0 2.88 30,272.0 3.05 35,361.0 3.44 41,704.0 9.56

2. Reverse Repos and Cash Collateral n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

3. Trading Securities and at FV through Income 40,212.9 25,121.0 2.57 26,489.0 2.67 31,438.0 3.06 45,064.0 10.33

4. Derivatives 72,444.4 45,256.0 4.62 50,777.0 5.12 49,928.0 4.86 28,884.0 6.62

5. Available for Sale Securities 52,494.0 32,793.0 3.35 42,955.0 4.33 46,602.0 4.54 55,707.0 12.78

6. Held to Maturity Securities 12,553.2 7,842.0 0.80 7,905.0 0.80 n.a. - n.a. -

7. At-equity Investments in Associates 683.5 427.0 0.04 429.0 0.04 479.0 0.05 n.a. -

8. Other Securities n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

9. Total Securities 178,388.0 111,439.0 11.38 128,555.0 12.96 128,447.0 12.50 129,655.0 29.74

10. Memo: Government Securities included Above 29,102.0 18,180.0 1.86 18,649.0 1.88 8,700.0 0.85 3,282.0 0.75

11. Memo: Total Securities Pledged n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

12. Investments in Property 10,310.5 6,441.0 0.66 5,997.0 0.60 4,757.0 0.46 2,631.0 0.60

13. Insurance Assets 208,195.9 130,060.0 13.29 129,702.0 13.08 125,258.0 12.19 1,893.0 0.43

14. Other Earning Assets 24,845.5 15,521.0 1.59 25,735.0 2.60 32,652.0 3.18 0.0 0.00

15. Total Earning Assets 1,407,834.2 879,474.0 89.84 912,858.0 92.06 953,444.0 92.81 418,618.0 96.01

C. Non-Earning Assets

1. Cash and Due From Banks 90,654.7 56,632.0 5.78 39,483.0 3.98 40,573.0 3.95 5,008.0 1.15

2. Memo: Mandatory Reserves included above n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

3. Foreclosed Real Estate n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

4. Fixed Assets 12,604.5 7,874.0 0.80 8,190.0 0.83 9,224.0 0.90 2,965.0 0.68

5. Goodwill 3,227.1 2,016.0 0.21 2,016.0 0.20 2,016.0 0.20 2,256.0 0.52

6. Other Intangibles 5,213.7 3,257.0 0.33 3,496.0 0.35 4,087.0 0.40 197.0 0.05

7. Current Tax Assets 893.2 558.0 0.06 621.0 0.06 680.0 0.07 300.0 0.07

8. Deferred Tax Assets 8,199.1 5,122.0 0.52 4,164.0 0.42 5,006.0 0.49 833.0 0.19

9. Discontinued Operations n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

10. Other Assets 38,447.3 24,018.0 2.45 20,746.0 2.09 12,225.0 1.19 5,856.0 1.34

11. Total Assets 1,567,073.8 978,951.0 100.00 991,574.0 100.00 1,027,255.0 100.00 436,033.0 100.00

Liabilities and Equity

D. Interest-Bearing Liabilities

1. Customer Deposits - Current 32,607.7 20,370.0 2.08 21,516.0 2.17 103,151.0 10.04 51,285.0 11.76

2. Customer Deposits - Savings 357,768.5 223,498.0 22.83 215,733.0 21.76 207,474.0 20.20 76,144.0 17.46

3. Customer Deposits - Term 249,801.5 156,051.0 15.94 156,384.0 15.77 96,116.0 9.36 43,509.0 9.98

4. Total Customer Deposits 640,177.7 399,919.0 40.85 393,633.0 39.70 406,741.0 39.59 170,938.0 39.20

5. Deposits from Banks 50,094.4 31,294.0 3.20 50,363.0 5.08 82,452.0 8.03 67,022.0 15.37

6. Repos and Cash Collateral n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

7. Other Deposits and Short-term Borrowings n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

8. Total Deposits, Money Market and Short-term Funding 690,272.1 431,213.0 44.05 443,996.0 44.78 489,193.0 47.62 237,960.0 54.57

9. Senior Debt Maturing after 1 Year 370,088.0 231,194.0 23.62 228,866.0 23.08 233,502.0 22.73 75,710.0 17.36

10. Subordinated Borrowing 56,963.3 35,585.0 3.64 36,232.0 3.65 34,727.0 3.38 17,256.0 3.96

11. Other Funding 84,557.4 52,823.0 5.40 51,363.0 5.18 46,348.0 4.51 14,243.0 3.27

12. Total Long Term Funding 511,608.8 319,602.0 32.65 316,461.0 31.92 314,577.0 30.62 107,209.0 24.59

13. Derivatives 57,706.1 36,049.0 3.68 42,158.0 4.25 40,485.0 3.94 26,892.0 6.17

14. Trading Liabilities 43,685.0 27,290.0 2.79 26,762.0 2.70 28,271.0 2.75 6,754.0 1.55

15. Total Funding 1,303,272.0 814,154.0 83.17 829,377.0 83.64 872,526.0 84.94 378,815.0 86.88

E. Non-Interest Bearing Liabilities

1. Fair Value Portion of Debt n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

2. Credit impairment reserves n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

3. Reserves for Pensions and Other 7,286.7 4,552.0 0.46 1,955.0 0.20 1,763.0 0.17 n.a. -

4. Current Tax Liabilities 168.1 105.0 0.01 149.0 0.02 51.0 0.00 0.0 0.00

5. Deferred Tax Liabilities 659.5 412.0 0.04 247.0 0.02 209.0 0.02 0.0 0.00

6. Other Deferred Liabilities n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

7. Discontinued Operations n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

8. Insurance Liabilities 129,539.0 80,923.0 8.27 81,372.0 8.21 77,261.0 7.52 34,062.0 7.81

9. Other Liabilities 53,240.0 33,259.0 3.40 31,572.0 3.18 31,338.0 3.05 13,457.0 3.09

10. Total Liabilities 1,494,165.2 933,405.0 95.35 944,672.0 95.27 983,148.0 95.71 426,334.0 97.78

F. Hybrid Capital

1. Pref. Shares and Hybrid Capital accounted for as Debt n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

2. Pref. Shares and Hybrid Capital accounted for as Equity n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

G. Equity

1. Common Equity 71,888.9 44,909.0 4.59 46,061.0 4.65 43,278.0 4.21 9,393.0 2.15

2. Non-controlling Interest 1,019.7 637.0 0.07 841.0 0.08 829.0 0.08 306.0 0.07

3. Securities Revaluation Reserves n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

4. Foreign Exchange Revaluation Reserves n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

5. Fixed Asset Revaluations and Other Accumulated OCI n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

6. Total Equity 72,908.6 45,546.0 4.65 46,902.0 4.73 44,107.0 4.29 9,699.0 2.22

7. Total Liabilities and Equity 1,567,073.8 978,951.0 100.00 991,574.0 100.00 1,027,255.0 100.00 436,033.0 100.00

8. Memo: Fitch Core Capital 50,268.9 31,403.0 3.21 33,478.0 3.38 29,158.0 2.84 n.a. -

9. Memo: Fitch Eligible Capital 54,999.2 34,358.0 3.51 36,400.5 3.67 33,805.0 3.29 n.a. -

Exchange rate

31 Dec 2009

USD1 = GBP0.61748

31 Dec 2008

USD1 = GBP0.68597

30 Jun 2011

USD1 = GBP0.62470

31 Dec 2010

USD1 = GBP0.63880

Page 13: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 13

Lloyds Banking Group plc

Summary Analytics30 Jun 2011 31 Dec 2010 31 Dec 2009 31 Dec 2008

6 Months - Interim Year End Year End Year End

A. Interest Ratios

1. Interest Income on Loans/ Average Gross Loans n.a. 4.09 4.74 6.83

2. Interest Expense on Customer Deposits/ Average Customer Deposits n.a. 1.32 1.31 2.92

3. Interest Income/ Average Earning Assets 3.05 3.14 3.63 4.76

4. Interest Expense/ Average Interest-bearing Liabilities 1.87 1.95 2.65 3.03

5. Net Interest Income/ Average Earning Assets 1.36 1.34 1.16 2.09

6. Net Int. Inc Less Loan Impairment Charges/ Av. Earning Assets 0.35 0.19 -0.90 1.31

7. Net Interest Inc Less Preferred Stock Dividend/ Average Earning Assets 1.36 1.34 1.16 2.09

B. Other Operating Profitability Ratios

1. Non-Interest Income/ Gross Revenues 44.82 49.73 58.56 21.82

2. Non-Interest Expense/ Gross Revenues 59.22 53.17 73.39 62.63

3. Non-Interest Expense/ Average Assets 1.32 1.31 1.90 1.60

4. Pre-impairment Op. Profit/ Average Equity 19.58 25.28 19.57 33.33

5. Pre-impairment Op. Profit/ Average Total Assets 0.91 1.15 0.69 0.96

6. Loans and securities impairment charges/ Pre-impairment Op. Profit 101.47 93.72 287.66 78.12

7. Operating Profit/ Average Equity -0.29 1.59 -36.73 7.29

8. Operating Profit/ Average Total Assets -0.01 0.07 -1.29 0.21

9. Taxes/ Pre-tax Profit 29.93 191.81 -183.40 -4.71

10. Pre-Impairment Operating Profit / Risk Weighted Assets 2.33 2.88 1.17 2.16

11. Operating Profit / Risk Weighted Assets -0.03 0.18 -2.20 0.47

C. Other Profitability Ratios

1. Net Income/ Average Total Equity -10.08 -0.56 9.97 7.63

2. Net Income/ Average Total Assets -0.47 -0.03 0.35 0.22

3. Fitch Comprehensive Income/ Average Total Equity -6.60 0.04 15.85 11.25

4. Fitch Comprehensive Income/ Average Total Assets -0.31 0.00 0.56 0.32

5. Net Income/ Av. Total Assets plus Av. Managed Securitized Assets n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

6. Net Income/ Risk Weighted Assets -1.20 -0.06 0.60 0.50

7. Fitch Comprehensive Income/ Risk Weighted Assets -0.79 0.00 0.95 0.73

D. Capitalization

1. Fitch Core Capital/Weighted Risks 8.19 8.24 5.91 n.a.

2. Fitch Eligible Capital/ Weighted Risks 8.96 8.96 6.85 n.a.

3. Tangible Common Equity/ Tangible Assets 3.63 3.79 3.25 1.48

4. Tier 1 Regulatory Capital Ratio 11.60 11.60 9.60 8.00

5. Total Regulatory Capital Ratio 15.00 15.20 12.40 11.20

6. Core Tier 1 Regulatory Capital Ratio 10.10 10.20 8.10 5.60

7. Equity/ Total Assets 4.65 4.73 4.29 2.22

8. Cash Dividends Paid & Declared/ Net Income 0.00 -18.22 0.00 241.66

9. Cash Dividend Paid & Declared/ Fitch Comprehensive Income 0.00 235.00 0.00 164.02

10. Cash Dividends & Share Repurchase/Net Income n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.

11. Net Income - Cash Dividends/ Total Equity -10.09 -0.65 6.70 -12.34

E. Loan Quality

1. Growth of Total Assets -1.27 -3.47 135.59 23.40

2. Growth of Gross Loans -0.77 -4.71 165.10 16.06

3. Impaired Loans(NPLs)/ Gross Loans 10.60 10.38 9.01 3.47

4. Reserves for Impaired Loans/ Gross loans 4.79 4.76 3.98 1.45

5. Reserves for Impaired Loans/ Impaired Loans 45.17 45.87 44.17 41.78

6. Impaired Loans less Reserves for Imp Loans/ Equity 78.81 74.56 74.47 51.27

7. Loan Impairment Charges/ Average Gross Loans 1.47 1.69 3.04 1.25

8. Net Charge-offs/ Average Gross Loans 1.47 1.08 0.78 0.65

9. Impaired Loans + Foreclosed Assets/ Gross Loans + Foreclosed Assets 10.60 10.38 9.01 3.47

F. Funding

1. Loans/ Customer Deposits 154.38 158.07 160.53 144.09

2. Interbank Assets/ Interbank Liabilities 90.02 60.11 42.89 62.22

3. Customer Deposits/ Total Funding excl Derivatives 51.40 50.00 48.88 48.57

Page 14: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 14

Lloyds Banking Group plc

Reference Data

6 Months - Interim 6 Months - Interim As % of Year End As % of Year End As % of Year End As % of

USDm GBPm Assets GBPm Assets GBPm Assets GBPm Assets

A. Off-Balance Sheet Items

1. Managed Securitized Assets Reported Off-Balance Sheet n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

2. Other off-balance sheet exposure to securitizations n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

3. Guarantees 6,497.5 4,059.0 0.41 4,131.0 0.42 6,049.0 0.59 4,720.0 1.08

4. Acceptances and documentary credits reported off-balance sheet 88.0 55.0 0.01 48.0 0.00 59.0 0.01 49.0 0.01

5. Committed Credit Lines 174,522.2 109,024.0 11.14 116,156.0 11.71 127,537.0 12.42 80,823.0 18.54

6. Other Contingent Liabilities 1,421.5 888.0 0.09 1,142.0 0.12 1,046.0 0.10 2,569.0 0.59

7. Total Business Volume 1,749,603.0 1,092,977.0 111.65 1,113,051.0 112.25 1,161,946.0 113.11 524,194.0 120.22

8. Memo: Total Weighted Risks 613,521.7 383,267.0 39.15 406,372.0 40.98 493,307.0 48.02 170,500.0 39.10

9. Fitch Adjustments to Weighted Risks. n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

10. Fitch Adjusted Weighted Risks 613,521.7 383,267.0 39.15 406,372.0 40.98 493,307.0 48.02 170,500.0 39.10

B. Average Balance Sheet

Average Loans 973,841.8 608,359.0 62.14 638,529.0 64.40 527,516.0 51.35 230,246.7 52.80

Average Earning Assets 1,423,488.1 889,253.0 90.84 935,860.0 94.38 778,085.0 75.74 368,726.3 84.56

Average Assets 1,575,702.4 984,341.3 100.55 1,015,651.3 102.43 842,139.0 81.98 385,720.3 88.46

Average Managed Securitized Assets (OBS) n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities 1,284,962.9 802,716.3 82.00 859,154.0 86.65 726,310.7 70.70 324,593.3 74.44

Average Common equity 72,164.2 45,081.0 4.61 45,370.7 4.58 28,697.3 2.79 11,120.0 2.55

Average Equity 72,952.9 45,573.7 4.66 46,221.7 4.66 29,610.7 2.88 11,068.3 2.54

Average Customer Deposits 636,262.2 397,473.0 40.60 406,929.3 41.04 335,587.0 32.67 168,651.0 38.68

C. Maturities

Asset Maturities:

Loans & Advances < 3 months n.a. n.a. - 68,941.0 6.95 97,064.0 9.45 47,108.0 10.80

Loans & Advances 3 - 12 Months n.a. n.a. - 28,193.0 2.84 30,296.0 2.95 15,430.0 3.54

Loans and Advances 1 - 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 114,102.0 11.51 126,355.0 12.30 56,331.0 12.92

Loans & Advances > 5 years n.a. n.a. - 381,361.0 38.46 373,254.0 36.34 123,866.0 28.41

Debt Securities < 3 Months n.a. n.a. - 8,665.0 0.87 4,574.0 0.45 38,416.0 8.81

Debt Securities 3 - 12 Months n.a. n.a. - 3,909.0 0.39 3,729.0 0.36 2,682.0 0.62

Debt Securities 1 - 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 15,702.0 1.58 24,034.0 2.34 11,902.0 2.73

Debt Securities > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 48,319.0 4.87 46,917.0 4.57 47,771.0 10.96

Interbank < 3 Months n.a. n.a. - 25,274.0 2.55 27,424.0 2.67 28,297.0 6.49

Interbank 3 - 12 Months n.a. n.a. - 2,550.0 0.26 4,759.0 0.46 7,002.0 1.61

Interbank 1 - 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 1,529.0 0.15 1,880.0 0.18 5,354.0 1.23

Interbank > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 919.0 0.09 1,298.0 0.13 105.0 0.02

Liability Maturities:

Retail Deposits < 3 months n.a. n.a. - 326,456.0 32.92 353,568.0 34.42 160,514.0 36.81

Retail Deposits 3 - 12 Months n.a. n.a. - 30,790.0 3.11 18,234.0 1.78 7,925.0 1.82

Retail Deposits 1 - 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 33,802.0 3.41 30,627.0 2.98 2,054.0 0.47

Retail Deposits > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 2,585.0 0.26 4,312.0 0.42 445.0 0.10

Other Deposits < 3 Months n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Other Deposits 3 - 12 Months n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Other Deposits 1 - 5 Years n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Other Deposits > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Interbank < 3 Months n.a. n.a. - 34,753.0 3.50 61,399.0 5.98 63,159.0 14.48

Interbank 3 - 12 Months n.a. n.a. - 4,152.0 0.42 16,612.0 1.62 1,399.0 0.32

Interbank 1 - 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 9,467.0 0.95 1,106.0 0.11 1,956.0 0.45

Interbank > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 1,991.0 0.20 3,335.0 0.32 0.0 0.00

Senior Debt Maturing < 3 months n.a. n.a. - 63,394.0 6.39 74,302.0 7.23 49,386.0 11.33

Senior Debt Maturing 3-12 Months n.a. n.a. - 46,629.0 4.70 33,475.0 3.26 9,192.0 2.11

Senior Debt Maturing 1- 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 67,190.0 6.78 75,912.0 7.39 13,643.0 3.13

Senior Debt Maturing > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - 51,653.0 5.21 49,813.0 4.85 3,489.0 0.80

Total Senior Debt on Balance Sheet n.a. n.a. - 228,866.0 23.08 233,502.0 22.73 75,710.0 17.36

Fair Value Portion of Senior Debt n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Covered Bonds n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Subordinated Debt Maturing < 3 months n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Subordinated Debt Maturing 3-12 Months n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Subordinated Debt Maturing 1- 5 Year n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Subordinated Debt Maturing > 5 Years n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

Total Subordinated Debt on Balance Sheet 56,963.3 35,585.0 3.64 36,232.0 3.65 34,727.0 3.38 17,256.0 3.96

Fair Value Portion of Subordinated Debt n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

D. Equity Reconciliation

1. Equity 72,908.6 45,546.0 4.65 46,902.0 4.73 44,107.0 4.29 9,699.0 2.22

2. Add: Pref. Shares and Hybrid Capital accounted for as Equity n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

3. Add: Other Adjustments n.a. n.a. - n.a. - n.a. - n.a. -

4. Published Equity 72,908.6 45,546.0 4.65 46,902.0 4.73 44,107.0 4.29 n.a. -

E. Fitch Eligible Capital Reconciliation

1. Total Equity as reported (including non-controlling interests) 72,908.6 45,546.0 4.65 46,902.0 4.73 44,107.0 4.29 9,699.0 2.22

2. Fair value effect incl in own debt/borrowings at fv on the B/S- CC only 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00

3. Non-loss-absorbing non-controlling interests 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00

4. Goodwill 3,227.1 2,016.0 0.21 2,016.0 0.20 2,016.0 0.20 2,256.0 0.52

5. Other intangibles 5,213.7 3,257.0 0.33 3,496.0 0.35 4,087.0 0.40 197.0 0.05

6. Deferred tax assets deduction 8,199.1 5,122.0 0.52 4,164.0 0.42 5,006.0 0.49 833.0 0.19

7. Net asset value of insurance subsidiaries 5,999.7 3,748.0 0.38 3,748.0 0.38 3,840.0 0.37 n.a. -

8. First loss tranches of off-balance sheet securitizations 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00

9. Fitch Core Capital 50,268.9 31,403.0 3.21 33,478.0 3.38 29,158.0 2.84 n.a. -

10. Eligible weighted Hybrid capital 4,730.3 2,955.0 0.30 2,922.5 0.29 4,647.0 0.45 5,567.0 1.28

11. Government held Hybrid Capital 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00

12. Fitch Eligible Capital 54,999.2 34,358.0 3.51 36,400.5 3.67 33,805.0 3.29 n.a. -

13. Eligible Hybrid Capital Limit 21,543.8 13,458.4 1.37 14,347.7 1.45 12,496.2 1.22 n.a. -

Exchange Rate

31 Dec 2009

USD1 = GBP0.61748

31 Dec 2008

USD1 = GBP0.68597

30 Jun 2011

USD1 = GBP0.62470

31 Dec 2010

USD1 = GBP0.63880

Page 15: Banks...Banks 17 January 2012 UK Lloyds Banking Group plc Full Rating Report Key Rating Drivers Support-Driven IDRs: The IDRs of Lloyds Banking Group plc and its banking subsidiaries

Banks

Lloyds Banking Group plc

January 2012 15

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE.

Copyright © 2012 by Fitch, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. One State Street Plaza, NY, NY 10004.Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings, Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch‟s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third-party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch‟s ratings should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion is based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at anytime for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of Great Britain, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

The ratings above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore,

Fitch has been compensated for the provision of the ratings.


Recommended