+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: atpeplow
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 14

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    1/14

    1

    1

    Bernhard Bettig

    Mechanical Design Research LabMechanical Engineering - Engineering Mechanics Dept.

    Michigan Technological University

    Web site: http://www.me.mtu.edu/~mdrl

    Rotordynamics: Unit 2

    - Timoshenko Beam Model

    2

    2-Node Beam ModelsThe beam models we will be lookingat have 8 degrees of freedom (2translations and 2 rotations at eachnode):

    (u1, v1, 1, 1 )

    ( u2, v2, 2, 2 )

    L, I, J, , E, G

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    2/14

    2

    3

    Important Variables

    The displacements and rotations at Node 1:

    u1, v1, 1, 1.

    The displacements and rotations at Node 2:

    u2, v2, 2, 2.

    The beam geometric properties L, I, and J.

    The beam material properties , Eand G

    The beam rotation:

    4

    Important Assumptions

    No displacements in the Zdirection.

    Linearization: u1, v1, 1, 1, u2, v2, 2, and

    2 are small.

    Gyroscopics about Z axis only:

    and are small compared to .

    Cross-section planes remain plane.

    The displacements are represented by aHermitian shape function

    ,,, 211 &&&

    2&

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    3/14

    3

    5

    Hermitian Shape Function

    The deflected shape is represented by a cubicpolynomial. I.e.:

    u(Z) = a0 + a1Z+ a2Z2 + a3Z

    3

    v(Z) = b0 + b1Z+ b2Z2 + b3Z

    3

    As well, the coefficients are determined from thedisplacements and slopes at the ends:

    dZ

    duu =

    2

    3212

    33

    22102

    11

    01

    32)(

    )(

    )0(

    )0(

    LaLaaLu

    LaLaLaauLu

    au

    auu

    ++==+++==

    ==

    ==

    6

    Hermitian Shape FunctionSolving for as

    in terms of u1,

    1, u2, and 2:

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )

    ( )22334

    23

    33

    3223

    32

    323

    31

    1)(

    321

    )(

    21

    )(

    321

    )(

    LzLzL

    zN

    LzzL

    zN

    zLLzLzL

    zN

    LLzzL

    zN

    =

    +=

    +=

    +=

    42322111

    42322111

    )(

    )(

    NNvNNvzv

    NNuNNuzu

    +++=

    +++=

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    4/14

    4

    7

    Hermitian Shape Function

    8

    Euler-Bernoulli Beam ModelWe start the lecture with a simpler beammodel, the Euler-Bernoulli beam. This

    model considers only:

    - stresses and strains due to bending

    - inertia due to lateral velocity

    Z

    X

    MM

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    5/14

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    6/14

    6

    11

    Euler-Bernoulli Beam Model

    Stiffness matrix (kE-B

    ) for deflections

    in X and Y directions:

    2

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    2

    22

    22

    3

    4

    612

    004

    00612

    26004

    61200612

    0026004

    0061200612

    v

    u

    v

    u

    L

    LSYM

    L

    L

    LLL

    LL

    LLL

    LL

    L

    EI

    12

    Timoshenko Beam ModelThis model also considers shear

    deformation and rotational inertia.

    This model is important for stubby

    shafts and higher frequencies.

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    7/14

    7

    13

    Timoshenko Beam Model

    Mass matrix (mri) for rotational inertia:

    2

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    2

    22

    22

    4

    336

    004

    00336

    3004

    33600336

    003004

    0033600336

    30

    &&

    &&

    &&

    &&

    &&

    &&

    &&

    &&

    v

    u

    v

    u

    L

    LSYM

    L

    L

    LLL

    LL

    LLL

    LL

    L

    I

    14

    Timoshenko Beam ModelNew stiffness matrix (k

    T):

    ( )

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    2

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    2

    22

    22

    3

    4

    612

    004

    00612

    26004

    61200612

    0026004

    0061200612

    1

    v

    u

    v

    u

    aL

    LSYM

    aL

    L

    aLLaL

    LL

    aLLaL

    LL

    La

    EI

    2

    12

    GAL

    EIa =

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    8/14

    8

    15

    Timoshenko Beam Model

    Timoshenko Beam Equation:

    ( ) Fukumm =++ TriBE &&

    16

    Accounting for CoriolisCoriolis affects appear as cross-

    coupling coefficients in the FE

    damping matrix (the same as with the

    spinning mass).

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    9/14

    9

    17

    Accounting for Coriolis

    Damping matrix (g):

    2

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    2

    22

    0

    00

    430

    33600

    0030

    0033600

    300430

    3360033600

    15

    &

    &

    &

    &

    &

    &

    &

    &

    v

    u

    v

    u

    SYM

    ANTI

    LL

    L

    LL

    L

    LLLL

    LL

    L

    I

    18

    Accounting for Coriolis

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    10/14

    10

    19

    Accounting for Torque

    Torque in the shaft also has a cross-

    coupling affect, but in the stiffnessmatrix. The affect is somewhat like

    wringing a wet towel.

    20

    Accounting for TorqueAdditional stiffness matrix (k

    To):

    2

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    005.01005.01

    00100010

    5.01005.0100

    10001000

    005.01005.01

    00100010

    5.01005.0100

    10001000

    v

    u

    v

    u

    LL

    LL

    LL

    LL

    L

    T

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    11/14

    11

    21

    Accounting for Torque

    22

    Accounting for Axial ForcesAn axial force in the shaft has the

    affect of straightening it.

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    12/14

    12

    23

    Accounting for Axial Forces

    Additional stiffness matrix (kax

    ):

    2

    2

    2

    2

    1

    1

    1

    1

    2

    2

    22

    22

    4

    336

    004

    00336

    3004

    33600336

    003004

    0033600336

    30

    v

    u

    v

    u

    L

    LSYM

    L

    L

    LLL

    LL

    LLL

    LL

    L

    Fax

    24

    Accounting for Axial Forces

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    13/14

    13

    25

    Complete Rotordynamic BeamModel

    Dynamic Equation for complete beam

    model:

    ( ) ( ) Fukkkugumm =+++++ axToTriBE &&&

    26

    Sample Questions1. What end moments are required to statically bend a

    solid steel shaft (3 m length x 300mm dia.) to 0.1 rad

    at each end? (Bent into a bow shape.) Use the Euler-Bernoulli beam model.

    2. What is the deflection in the middle?

    3. Repeat question 1 using the Timoshenko model.

    4. What if the shaft is also being bent (bowed) in thesame plane at an angular rate of acceleration of 0.002

    rad/sec2 at each end? Use the Euler-Bernoulli model.

    5. Repeat question 2 using the Timoshenko model.

    6. What if the shaft is also spinning about the +Zdirection at 2 Hz and is bowing in the same plane at0.02 rad/sec at each end?

  • 7/29/2019 BEAM FE Formulation Rotordynamics_2

    14/14

    14

    27

    Sample Questions

    7. What if the shaft is carrying a torque of 1000 N-m(about +Z at the upper end, -Z at lower end)?

    8. What if the shaft is carrying an axial force of 1000 N?

    9. In the equation:

    which matrices couple deflections in the X and Y

    directions?

    10. In the final equation , which

    matrices will end up being symmetric? Whichmatrices will be anti-symmetric? Which will beneither? What if the affects of torque were not

    included?

    FkuucuM =++ &&&

    ( ) ( ) Fukkkugumm =+++++ axToTriBE &&&


Recommended