Beam Transfer Lines• Distinctions between transfer lines and circular machines• Linking machines together• Trajectory correction• Trajectory correction• Emittance and mismatch measurement• Blow-up from steering errors, optics mismatch and thin screens• Phase-plane exchange
Brennan GoddardCERN
Injection, extraction and transfer
CERN Complex• An accelerator has limited dynamic range.
• Chain of stages needed to h hi hreach high energy
• Periodic re-filling of storage rings, like LHCExternal experiments like• External experiments, like CNGS
Transfer lines transport thebeam between accelerators,and onto targets, dumps,instruments etc.
LHC: Large Hadron ColliderSPS: Super Proton SynchrotronAD: Antiproton DeceleratorISOLDE: Isotope Separator Online DevicePSB: Proton Synchrotron BoosterPS P t S h tPS: Proton SynchrotronLINAC: LINear AcceleratorLEIR: Low Energy RingCNGS: CERN Neutrino to Gran Sasso
Normalised phase space• Transform real transverse coordinates x, x’ by
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⋅⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⋅=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⋅=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡'
011' x
xxx
SSS βαβN
'XX
1 xβ
⋅=X
⎦⎣⎦⎣⎦⎣⎦⎣ SSS ββ
'1 xx
S
βα
β
+'X 'xx SSS
βαβ
+⋅=X
Normalised phase space
Real phase space Normalised phase space
1
γαε−x’
ε='X
'X
γε 1
βε 1
γε=max'x
ε=maxX
⇒x
β
Area = πεArea = πε
⇒X
βε=maxxε=maxX
22 ''2 xxxx ⋅+⋅⋅+⋅= βαγε 22 'XX +=ε
General transport
y
s
Beam transport: moving from s1 to s2 through n elements, each with transfer matrix Mi
xx
y ss
1
2
⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⋅⎥⎤
⎢⎡
=⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⋅=⎥⎤
⎢⎡
21'2 xSCxx
M
1
∏=n
21 MM⎥⎦
⎢⎣
⎥⎦
⎢⎣
⎥⎦
⎢⎣
⎥⎦
⎢⎣
→ ''''21'2 xSCxx
M ∏=
→i
n1
21 MM
( )
( ) ( )[ ] ( )⎥⎥⎥⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎡
ΔΔΔΔ
ΔΔ+Δ=→ β
μββμαμββ
ii1
sinsincos 2111
2
21MTwiss parameterisation
( ) ( )[ ] ( )⎥⎥⎦⎢
⎢⎣
Δ−ΔΔ+−Δ− μαμββμααμααββ sincossin1cos1
22
12121
21
Circular Machine
Circumference = L
( ) ⎥⎤
⎢⎡ +
==QQQ πβπαπ
12sin2sin2cos
2MMOne turn ( ) ⎥⎥⎦⎢
⎢⎣
−+−== →→ QQQL παππαβ 2sin2cos2sin11 2021 MMOne turn
• The solution is periodic p• Periodicity condition for one turn (closed ring) imposes α1=α2, β1=β2, D1=D2
• This condition uniquely determines α(s), β(s), μ(s), D(s) around the whole ring
Circular Machine
• Periodicity of the structure leads to regular motion– Map single particle coordinates on each turn at any location
– Describes an ellipse in phase space, defined by one set of α and βvalues ⇒ Matched Ellipse (for this location)
x’
βα 2
max1' += ax βαγ 22 ''2 ⋅+⋅⋅+⋅= xxxxa
xArea = πa β
αγ21+=
βax =max
Circular Machine
• For a location with matched ellipse (α, β), an injected beam of emittance ε, characterised by a different ellipse (α*, β*) generates (via filamentation) a large ellipse with the original α β but larger ε(via filamentation) a large ellipse with the original α, β, but larger ε
x’
α, β
x’
α, β
xx
Turn 1 Turn 2
After filamentation
εο, α∗ , β∗
After filamentation
εο, α∗ , β∗
ε > εο, α, βε > εο, α, βTurn 3 Turn n>>1
Matched ellipse determines beam shape
Transfer line
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⋅=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡→ '21'
2
2
xx
xx
MOne pass:
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡'1
xx
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡'2
2
xx
⎤⎡ β
⎦⎣ 1x ⎦⎣ 2x
( )
( ) ( )[ ] ( )⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
Δ−ΔΔ+−Δ−
ΔΔ+Δ=→
μαμββμααμααββ
μββμαμββ
sincossin1cos1
sinsincos
22
12121
21
2111
2
21M
⎦⎣
• No periodic condition existsp• The Twiss parameters are simply propagated from beginning to end of line• At any point in line, α(s) β(s) are functions of α1 β1
Transfer line• On a single pass there is no regular motion
– Map single particle coordinates at entrance and exit.
– Infinite number of equally valid possible starting ellipses for single particleInfinite number of equally valid possible starting ellipses for single particle……transported to infinite number of final ellipses…
L→0Mx’
x’
α1, β1
α∗ β∗α2, β2
⎥⎤
⎢⎡ 2x
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡'1
1
xx
x
α∗1, β∗1 ⎥⎦
⎢⎣
'2x
x xTransfer Line
βα∗2, β∗2Entry Exit
Transfer Line• Initial α, β defined for transfer line by beam shape at entrance
x’ x’α∗, β∗x’ x’α∗, β∗
α, βα, β
x xx x
Gaussian beamNon-Gaussian beam(e.g. slow extracted)
Gaussian beamNon-Gaussian beam(e.g. slow extracted)
• Propagation of this beam ellipse depends on line elementsPropagation of this beam ellipse depends on line elements
• A transfer line optics is different for different input beams
Transfer Line
350
• The optics functions in the line depend on the initial values
Design β functions in a transfer line
200
250
300
[m]
- Design βx functions in a transfer line− βx functions with different initial conditions
50
100
150
Bet
aX [
1500 2000 2500 30000
50
S [m]
• Same considerations are true for Dispersion function:Same considerations are true for Dispersion function:– Dispersion in ring defined by periodic solution → ring elements
– Dispersion in line defined by initial D and D’ and line elements
Transfer Line
• Another difference….unlike a circular ring, a change of an element in a line affects only the downstream Twiss values (including di i )
300
350
dispersion)- Unperturbed βx functions in a transfer line− βx functions with modification of one quadrupole strength
150
200
250
Bet
aX [m
]
10% change in this QF strength
1500 2000 2500 30000
50
100
1500 2000 2500 3000S [m]
Linking Machines
• Beams have to be transported from extraction of one machine to injection of next machine– Trajectories must be matched, ideally in all 6 geometric degrees of freedom
(x,y,z,θ,φ,ψ)
• Other important constraints can includeOther important constraints can include– Minimum bend radius, maximum quadrupole gradient, magnet aperture,
cost, geology
Linking Machines
Extraction
Matched Twiss at extraction propagated to matched Twiss at injection
Transferα1x, β1x , α1y, β1yαx(s), βx(s) , αy(s), βy(s)
s
α2x, β2x , α2y, β2y
Injection
⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⎥⎤
⎢⎡ −
⎥⎤
⎢⎡ 1
222
''''2 ββ
SSSCCSCCSCSC
The Twiss parameters can be propagated when the transfer matrix M is known
⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⎥⎤
⎢⎡
⎥⎤
⎢⎡ 2 xSCxx
M⎥⎥⎥
⎦⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⋅⎥⎥⎥
⎦⎢⎢⎢
⎣ −−+−=
⎥⎥⎥
⎦⎢⎢⎢
⎣ 1
122
2
2
'''2'''''
γα
γα
SSCCSSSCCSCC⎥
⎦⎢⎣
⋅⎥⎦
⎢⎣
=⎥⎦
⎢⎣
⋅=⎥⎦
⎢⎣
→ ''''21'2
2
xSCxxM
Linking Machines• Linking the optics is a complicated process
– Parameters at start of line have to be propagated to matched parameters at the end of the line
– Need to “match” 8 variables (αx βx Dx D’x and αy βy Dy D’y)
– Maximum β and D values are imposed by magnet apertures
Other constraints can exist– Other constraints can exist • phase conditions for collimators,
• insertions for special equipment like stripping foils
– Need to use a number of independently powered (“matching”) quadrupoles
– Matching with computer codes and relying on mixture of theory, i i t iti t i l dexperience, intuition, trial and error, …
Linking MachinesF l t f li i lif th bl b d i i th• For long transfer lines we can simplify the problem by designing the line in separate sections– Regular central section – e.g. FODO or doublet, with quads at regular
i ( b di di l ) ith t d i ispacing, (+ bending dipoles), with magnets powered in series
– Initial and final matching sections – independently powered quadrupoles, with sometimes irregular spacing.
150
200
250
300
β [m
]
BETXBETY
0
50
100
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000S [m]Regular lattice (FODO)
SPS LHC(elements all powered in serieswith same strengths)
Final matching
section
Initial matching
section
SPS to LHC Transfer Line
Extractionpoint
Injectionpoint
Trajectory correction
• Magnet misalignments, field and powering errors cause the trajectory to deviate from the design
• Use small independently powered dipole magnets (correctors) toUse small independently powered dipole magnets (correctors) to steer the beam
• Measure the response using monitors (pick-ups) downstream of the corrector (π/2 3π/2 )corrector (π/2, 3π/2, …)
Corrector dipole Pickup Trajectory
QF QF
π/2
QF
QD QD
QF
• Horizontal and vertical elements are separated
• H-correctors and pick-ups located at F-quadrupoles (large βx )
V t d i k l t d t D d l (l β )• V-correctors and pick-ups located at D-quadrupoles (large βy)
Trajectory correction
• Global correction can be used which attempts to minimise the RMS offsets at the BPMs, using all or some of the available corrector magnets.
• Steering in matching sections, extraction and injection region requires particular care
D and β functions can be large → bigger beam size– D and β functions can be large → bigger beam size
– Often very limited in aperture
– Injection offsets can be detrimental for performance
Trajectory correction
Uncorrected trajectory.
y growing as a result f d i thof random errors in the
line.
The RMS at the BPMs is 3.4 mm, and ymax is , ymax12.0mm
Corrected trajectory.
The RMS at the BPMs is 0.3mm and ymax is 1mm
Trajectory correction
• Sensitivity to BPM errors is an important issue– If the BPM phase sampling is poor, the loss of a few key BPMs can
allow a very bad trajectory, while all the monitor readings are ~zero
Correction with some monitors disabled
y j y, g
With poor BPM phase sampling the correction algorithm produces a trajectory with 185mmtrajectory with 185mm ymax
Note the change of vertical scale
Steering (dipole) errors
• Precise delivery of the beam is important.– To avoid injection oscillations and emittance growth in rings
– For stability on secondary particle production targetsFor stability on secondary particle production targets
• Convenient to express injection error in σ (includes x and x’ errors)
Δ [ ] √ √ 2 2 β 2
Δa
Δa [σ] = √((X2+X’2)/ε) = √((γx2 + 2αxx’+ βx’2)/ε)
X
'X
Septum
XBumpermagnets kicker Mis-steered
injected beam
Steering (dipole) errors
• Static effects (e.g. from errors in alignment, field, calibration, …) are dealt with by trajectory correction (steering).
B t there are also d namic effects from• But there are also dynamic effects, from:– Power supply ripples
– Temperature variations
– Non-trapezoidal kicker waveforms
• These dynamic effects produce a variable injection offset which can vary from batch to batch or even within a batchvary from batch to batch, or even within a batch.
• An injection damper system is used to minimise effect on emittance
Blow-up from steering error• Consider a collection of particles with amplitudes A
• The beam can be injected with a error in angle and position.
• For an injection error Δa (in units of sigma = √βε) the mis-injected• For an injection error Δay (in units of sigma = √βε) the mis-injected beam is offset in normalised phase space by d = Δax√ε
'X Mi i j t dMatched X Misinjectedbeam
Matchedparticles
X
A
d
Blow-up from steering error• The new particle coordinates in normalised phase space are
θcosnew dXX 0 +=
θsinnew dXX '0
' +=
Mi i j t dMatched 'X
• For a general particle distribution, where A denotes amplitude in
Misinjectedbeam
Matchedparticles
X
'222 XXA +=
where A denotes amplitude in normalised phase space A
θ X
2/2A=ε
d
Blow-up from steering errorS if l i th di t
( ) ( )'00
'222 dXdXXXA +++=+=22
θθ sincosnewnewnew
• So if we plug in the new coordinates….
( )
( ) 2'00'2002
2'00'200
dXXDXXA
dXXdXX
++++=
++++=
2
2
2
2
θθ
θθ
sincos
sincos
new ( )
( ) 2'00
0000
dXXD +++= 0 22 θθε sincos
new
0 0
2d+= 02ε
Giving for the emittance increase
2/2/ 022 dA εε +== newnew
• Giving for the emittance increase
( )2/102aΔε +=
Blow-up from steering error
A numerical example….
Consider an offset Δa of 0.5 sigma for ginjected beam
Misinjected beam( )0 2/1 Δεε += 2anew
'X
0ε1.125=X
0.5√ε√ε
X
MatchedBeam
Blow-up from betatron mismatch
• Optical errors occur in transfer line and ring, such that the beam can be injected with a mismatch.
• Filamentation will produce an emittance increase.
• In normalised phase space, consider Mismatchedbeam'Xp p ,
the matched beam as a circle, and the mismatched beam as an ellipse.
beamX
X
Matchedbeam
Blow-up from betatron mismatch
[ ])sin()cos('),sin( 2222222 ooo xx φφαφφβεφφβε +−+=+=
General betatron motion – coordinates of particles on mismtached ellipse
⎤⎡⎤⎡⎤⎡ 2011 xX
applying the normalising transformation for the matched beam (subscript 1)
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⋅⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡⋅=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
2
2
111 '011
xx
βαβ22'X
X
an ellipse is obtained in normalised phase space
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−+
⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢
⎣
⎡⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+=
2
121
1
2
1
22
2
121
1
2
2
12 2ββαα
ββ
ββ
ββαα
ββ
ββ
2222
22 'XX'XXA
an ellipse is obtained in normalised phase space
2121212 ⎟⎞
⎜⎛
⎟⎞
⎜⎛− ββββ
βββ
characterised by γnew, βnew and αnew, where
2
121
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
121
1
2⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
−+==⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
−=ββ
ααββ
ββ
γββ
βββ
ααββ
α newnewnew , ,
Blow-up from betatron mismatch
Mismatched( ) ( )112
112
−−+=−++= HHAbHHAa ,
From the general ellipse properties
'Xbeam
b
22
where
X
ab
( )
⎟⎞
⎜⎛
+⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
+
+=
2
2
1211
21
ββααββ
βγ newnewH
AX
⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜
⎝+⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎝
−+=1
2
2
121
1
2
2
1
2 ββαα
ββ A
λAa
MatchedBeam generally
giving
( ) ( )112
11112
1 −−+=−++= HHHHλ
λ ,
λλ
⋅==
AA
ba
)cos(1),sin( 1new1new φφλ
φφλ +=+⋅= A'XAX
Blow-up from betatron mismatch
)(cos1)(sin 2202
220
2211newnew φφ
λφφλ +++⋅=+= AA'XXA 22
new
We can evaluate the square of the distance of a particle from the origin as
The new emittance is the average over all phases
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ +++== 22
22 )(cos1)(sin21
21 φφ
λφφλε 11new
20
20
2 AAAnew
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ +++=
⎟⎠
⎜⎝
22
22
2
)(cos1)(sin21
22
φφλ
φφλ
λ
1120A
0.5 0.5
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ +=2
20
121
λλε
⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜
⎝
⎛+⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+==⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ += 2
2
121
21002
20 2
1121
ββ
ββαα
ββ
ββεε
λλεε Hnew
If we’re feeling diligent, we can substitute back for λ to give
⎟⎠
⎜⎝ ⎠⎝⎠⎝ 121222 ββββλ
where subscript 1 refers to matched ellipse, 2 to mismatched ellipse.
Blow-up from betatron mismatchA numerical example….consider b = 3a for the mismatched ellipse
3/ abλ
Mismatched
3/ == abλ
'X
( )22 11 λλεε +
beamThen
X
( )0
0
67.1
12
ε
λλεε
=
+=new
oεa b=3a
X
MatchedBeam
Emittance and mismatch measurement• A profile monitor is need to measure the beam size
– E.g. beam screen (luminescent) provides 2D density profile of the beam
• Profile fit gives transverse beam sizes σ• Profile fit gives transverse beam sizes σ.
• In a ring, β is ‘known’ so ε can be calculated from a single screen
Emittance and mismatch measurement
• Emittance and optics measurement in a line needs 3 profile measurements in a dispersion-free region
• Measurements of σ0 σ1 σ2 plus the two transfer matrices M01 andMeasurements of σ0,σ1,σ2, plus the two transfer matrices M01 and M12 allows determination of ε, α and β
Ms0 s2s1
M 32→M21→M
2
22
1
21
0
20
βσ
βσ
βσε ===
σ0 σ1 σ2
Emittance and mismatch measurement⎤⎡
⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡⋅⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
−−+−
−=
⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
0
0
0
2111
21
11111111
2111
21
1
1
1
'''2'''''
2
γαβ
γαβ
SSCCSSCSSCCC
SSCC
We have
( )
( ) ( )[ ] ( )⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
−+−−
+=⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
μΔαμΔββμΔααμΔααββ
μΔββμΔαμΔββ
sincossin1cos1
sinsincos
22
12121
21
2111
2
'1
'1
11
SCSC
where
( ) ( )20
0
22
0220222
20
0
21
01102
11 1212 αβ
αββαβ
αββ ++−=++−= SSCCSSCC ,so that
⎥⎦⎢⎣ βββ 221
Using 0
2
0
220
2
0
11
20
0 βσσ
ββσσ
βε
σβ ⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛=⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛== , ,
W00 21 βα =we find
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )222222 ////// SCSCSS +σσσσ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )2211
11222
1012202
////////
SCSCSCSCSS
−+−−= σσσσ Wwhere
Emittance and mismatch measurement
Some (more) algebra with above equations gives
( ) ( ) ( ) 4/////1 222
222
22
2020
2WW −+−= SCSCSσσβ
2 β
And finally we are in a position to evaluate ε and α0
W1 β020 βσε =
Comparing measured α β0 with expected values gives numerical
W00 2βα =
Comparing measured αo, β0 with expected values gives numerical measurement of mismatch
Blow-up from thin scattererS tt i l t ti i d i th b• Scattering elements are sometimes required in the beam– Thin beam screens (Al2O3,Ti) used to generate profiles.
– Metal windows also used to separate vacuum of transfer lines from vacuum in circular machines.
– Foils are used to strip electrons to change charge state
• The emittance of the beam increases when it passes through dueThe emittance of the beam increases when it passes through, due to multiple Coulomb scattering.
θs
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⋅+=
radradinc
cs L
LLLZ
cMeVpmrad 10
2 log11.01]/[
1.14][β
θrms angle increase:⎠⎝ radradc p ][β
βc = v/c, p = momentum, Zinc = particle charge /e, L = target length, Lrad = radiation length
Blow-up from thin scatterer
Ellipse afterscattering
Each particles gets a random angle change θs but there is no effect on the positions at the scatterer
'X
θβ+=
=
'0
'
0
XX
XXnew
sθβ+0XXnew
After filamentation the particles have different amplitudes and the beam has
X
Matchedellipse
a larger emittance
2/2Anew=ε
Blow-up from thin scatterer+ '222 XXA
Ellipse afterfilamentation
( )2sθβ++=
+=
'020
222
XX
XXA newnewnew'X
uncorrelated( )22
22
2
2 ss
θβθβ
βθθβ
+++
+++=
''22
'0'200
XXXA
XXX
20
22
22
2
ss
ss
θβθβε
θβθβ
++=
+++=
'0
02002
X
XXXA new
0
X
Matchedellipse
202 sθβε +=
20 2 snew θβεε +=
Need to keep β small to minimise blow-up (small β means large spread in angles in beam distribution, so additional angle has small effect on distn.)
Blow-up from charge stripping foilF LHC h i Pb53+ i t i d t Pb82+ t 4 25G V/ i• For LHC heavy ions, Pb53+ is stripped to Pb82+ at 4.25GeV/u using a 0.8mm thick Al foil, in the PS to SPS line
• Δε is minimised with low-β insertion (βxy ~5 m) in the transfer liney
• Emittance increase expected is about 8%
120TT10 optics
80
100
Stripping foil
]
beta Xbeta Y
40
60
Bet
a [m
]
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000
20
S [m]
Emittance exchange insertion• Acceptances of circular accelerators tend to be larger in horizontal
plane (bending dipole gap height small as possible)
• Several multiturn extraction process produce beams which have p pemittances which are larger in the vertical plane → larger losses
• We can overcome this by exchanging the H and V phase planes (emittance exchange)(emittance exchange)
Low energy machine After multi-turn Aft itt High energy machine
y
extraction After emittanceexchange
x
In the following, remember that the matrix is our friend…
Emittance exchangePhase-plane exchange requires a transformation of the form:
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
0
0
2423
1413
1
1
'0000
' xx
mmmm
xx
⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝
=
⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝ 0
0
0
4241
3231
2423
1
1
1
'0000
00
' yyx
mmmm
mm
yyx
A skew quadrupole is a normal quadrupole rotated by an angle θ.
The transfer matrix S obtained by a rotation of the normal transfer matrix Mq:1S = R-1MqR
where R is the rotation matrix ⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎛
θθθθ
sin0cos00sin0cos
⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜
⎝ −−
θθθθ
cos0sin00cos0sin
( i lf f h t R d b h ki th t i t f d t(you can convince yourself of what R does by checking that x0 is transformed to x1 = x0cosθ +y0sinθ, y0 into -x0sinθ +y0cosθ, etc.)
Emittance exchange⎞⎛
For a thin-lens approximation⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
−
=
10001000010001
δ
δqM
(where δ = kl = 1/f is the quadrupole strength)
So that⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛
−⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛
−−
== −
0cos0sinsin0cos0
0sin0cos
01000010001
0cos0sinsin0cos00sin0cos
1
θθθθ
θθδ
θθθθ
θθ
RMRS q
⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛
⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝ −⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝ −⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
02i120001
cos0sin0100cos0sin0
θδθδ
θθδθθ
⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝ −
=
12cos02sin010002sin12cos
θδθδ
θδθδ
N l d45º k d
For the case of θ = 45º, ⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎛
=0100001
δS
Normal quad45º skew quad
this reduces to ⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜
⎝
=
1000100
δ
S
Emittance exchangeThe transformation required can be achieved with 3 such skew quads in a lattice,
of strengths δ1, δ2, δ3, with transfer matrices S1, S2, S3
A B
Skew quad Skew quad Skew quad
δ1 δ2 δ3
The transfer matrix without the skew quads is C = B A .
⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝
⎛
=
y
x
CC
C
0000
0000
[ ]
( ) ( ) [ ]⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛
−+−−
+
=xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx
x
x
φΔαφΔβφΔααφΔαα
φΔββφΔαφΔββ
sincossin1cos
sinsincos
12112
2111
2
C
and similar for C[ ]⎟⎟⎠
⎜⎜⎝
− xxxx
x
xx
φΔαφΔβββsincos 2
21
21and similar for Cy
Emittance exchangeWith the skew quads the overall matrix is M = S3B S2A S1
⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎛
⎤⎡⎤⎡
++ 23412233121121221341211 δδδδδ ababccabc
( ) ( )
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
++
+⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++
++⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++
+
=
34211234332341221134134
33423422
211234333
2332212232123422
211341343
21342221
δδδδδ
δδδδδ
δδδδδδδ
δδ
cabcbaabc
cababc
abcabcabc
abc
M
( ) ( )⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝+⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++
++⎥
⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡++
+
++
3234124421124443
23312112321244312
213422144
213412113
34211234332341221134134
δδδδδδδ
δδδδδδδδ
δδδδδ
abcabcabc
abcabcabc
cabcbaabc
⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎛
000000
2423
1413
mmmmmm
Equating the terms with our target matrix form⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜
⎝ 0000
4241
3231
mmmm
a list of conditions result which must be met for phase-plane exchangea list of conditions result which must be met for phase plane exchange.
Emittance exchange
21341211
34
12
000
δδabccc
+===
( )32341244
21123433
32123422
21341211
000
δδδδδδ
abcabcabc
+=+=+=
( )( )23312112321124443
21134134321342221
00
δδδδδδδδδδ
abcabcabcabc
+++=+++=
The simplest conditions are c12 = c34 = 0.The simplest conditions are c12 c34 0.
Looking back at the matrix C, this means that Δφx and Δφy need to be integer multiples of π (i.e. the phase advance from first to last skew quad should be 180º, 360º, …))
W l h f th t th f th k d1234
33
3412
1121 ab
cab
c−=−=δδ
We also have for the strength of the skew quads3412
44
1234
2232 ab
cab
c−=−=δδ
Emittance exchangeSeveral solutions exist which give M the target form.
One of the simplest is obtained by setting all the skew quadrupole strengths the same, and putting the skew quads at symmetric locations in a 90º FODO l ttilattice
A B (=A)
δ δ δFrom symmetry A = B, and the values of α and β at all skew quads are identical.
( )⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎛ + xxxxx φΔβφΔαφΔ sinsincos
with the same form for yTherefore ( ) ( )⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜
⎝−
−−
==xxx
x
xxxx
φΔαφΔβφΔα
sincossin1 2BA
The matrix C is similar, but with phase advances of 2Δφ
Emittance exchange
⎞⎛ βα 00
Since we have chose a 90º FODO phase advance, Δφx = Δφy = π/2, and 2Δφx = 2Δφy = π which means we can now write down A,B and C:
( )
⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛
−−
−
==
xx
x
xx
αβα
βα
2
001
00
BA ⎟⎟⎟⎞
⎜⎜⎜⎛
−−
=00100001
Ci.e. 180º across the insertion in both planes
( )⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜⎜
⎝−
−− y
y
y
yy
αβ
α
βα
2100
00BA
⎟⎟⎟
⎠⎜⎜⎜
⎝ −−
10000100 insertion in both planes
⎠⎝
sδδδδ 1321 ====we can then write down the skew lens strength as
yxs
ββ321we can then write down the skew lens strength as
12For the 90º FODO with half-cell length L, 2
1,2LL sDF ==−= δδδ
Summary• Transfer lines present interesting challenges and differences from
circular machines– No periodic condition mean optics is defined by transfer line element
strengths and by initial beam ellipse
– Matching at the extremes is subject to many constraints
– Trajectory correction is rather simple compared to circular machineTrajectory correction is rather simple compared to circular machine
– Emittance blow-up is an important consideration, and arises from several sources
Phase plane rotation is sometimes required skew quads– Phase-plane rotation is sometimes required - skew quads
Keywords for related topics• Transfer lines
– Achromat bends
– Algorithms for optics matchingAlgorithms for optics matching
– The effect of alignment and gradient errors on the trajectory and optics
– Trajectory correction algorithms
– SVD trajectory analysis
– Kick-response optics measurement techniques in transfer lines
– Optics measurements including dispersion and δp/p with >3 screensOptics measurements including dispersion and δp/p with >3 screens
– Different phase-plane exchange insertion solutions