BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to consider policy and implementation refinements to the Energy Storage Procurement Framework and Design Program (D.13-10-040, D.14-10-045) and related Action Plan of the California Energy Storage Roadmap. Rulemaking 15-03-011 (Filed March 26, 2015) REPLY COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) ON JOINT STAFF PROPOSAL ON MULTIPLE USE APPLICATIONS FOR ENERGY STORAGE JANET S. COMBS AMBER DEAN WYATT Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-1524 Facsimile: (626) 302-3990 E-mail: [email protected]Dated: June 30, 2017
Transcript
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Order Instituting Rulemaking to consider policy and implementation refinements to the Energy Storage Procurement Framework and Design Program (D.13-10-040, D.14-10-045) and related Action Plan of the California Energy Storage Roadmap.
Rulemaking 15-03-011 (Filed March 26, 2015)
REPLY COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) ON JOINT STAFF PROPOSAL ON MULTIPLE USE APPLICATIONS
FOR ENERGY STORAGE
JANET S. COMBS AMBER DEAN WYATT
Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-1524 Facsimile: (626) 302-3990 E-mail: [email protected]
Dated: June 30, 2017
1
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Order Instituting Rulemaking to consider policy and implementation refinements to the Energy Storage Procurement Framework and Design Program (D.13-10-040, D.14-10-045) and related Action Plan of the California Energy Storage Roadmap.
Rulemaking 15-03-011 (Filed March 26, 2015)
REPLY COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) ON JOINT STAFF PROPOSAL ON MULTIPLE USE APPLICATIONS
FOR ENERGY STORAGE
Southern California Edison Company (SCE) respectfully submits these reply comments
in response to the Administrative Law Judge’s May 18, 2017 Ruling (the Ruling) Seeking
Comments on the Joint Staff Proposal (the Proposal) by the California Public Utilities
Commission (Commission) and the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) on
Multiple Use Applications (MUA) for Energy Storage Devices.
I.
INTRODUCTION
SCE is pleased to see general agreement among parties on many of the principles guiding
MUAs for energy storage, including principles for ensuring reliability, maintaining flexibility,
and including timing considerations into determinations of incremental value of services for
storage devices.
As noted in SCE’s and other parties’ opening comments, an important consideration for
2
energy storage MUA rules is achieving a balance that ensures reliability while also allowing
enough flexibility for energy storage devices to provide maximum value to the grid and end
users.1 To this end, SCE reemphasizes its positions from its opening comments that: (1) to
ensure reliability services for storage devices with MUA, decisions may require analysis on a
case-by-case basis to determine more precise rules for the future;2 and, (2) timing considerations
must be incorporated into value determinations for energy storage resources.
As such, although SCE does not disagree with the five service domains and services
identified in the Proposal, SCE encourages the agencies to avoid overly prescriptive rules that
may preclude a resource from providing all the potential services that it can provide, or,
alternatively, attempting to provide two simultaneous services, which may be incompatible.
Despite agreeing in principle on many issues, there were a few specific topics where SCE
and other parties did not appear to agree in opening comments. SCE’s Reply Comments focus
on those key areas of discrepancy, and offer further recommendations for consideration,
including:
• Recommendations that any considerations for restructuring rates be addressed in
existing, open rate-making proceedings, rather than within this proceeding;
• Need for Commission-approved standards for ensuring the safety, accuracy, and
reliability of internal metering and related meter and data services before they
could be used in lieu of existing systems to bill end-use customers;
• Opposition to the California Energy Storage Alliance’s (CESA) recommendation
for the Commission to direct investor-owned utilities (IOUs) to pursue changes in
their Wholesale Distribution Access Tariffs (WDAT) to accommodate MUAs,
1 See, for example, SCE Comments at p. 6: “MUA rules for storage should not compromise reliability. However, being overly restrictive on MUA opportunities will artificially limit opportunities for storage.” And, Tesla Comments at p. 3. (“Tesla also suggests that the existing framework be modified to ensure that storage systems are not unduly limited.”)
2 See: SCE Comments at p. 6.
3
due to jurisdictional violations;
• Opposition to CESA’s “Look back” proposal – which creates opportunities for
gaming and market manipulation; and,
• Recommendation to address various jurisdictional and operational issues
associated with Net Energy Metered (NEM) Solar paired storage projects before
expanding MUA cases for such devices.
SCE expands on these recommendations in section II, below.
II.
REPLY COMMENTS TO SPECIFIC PARTY RESPONSES
A. Rate Design Structures Associated with Demand Charges or Demand Response
Programs Should be Addressed in the Appropriate Rate Design Proceedings – Not
in the Energy Storage Proceeding
In response to Question 6, parties—including Tesla, SunRun, Center for Sustainable
Energy (CSE), Advanced Microgrid Solutions (AMS), Calpine, and NRG Energy (NRG)—made
proposals for changes to current rate designs that could accommodate the timing example
outlined in Question 6. These comments include: Tesla’s recommendation that the Commission
consider promulgating rate structures where demand charges are not imposed during anticipated
or actual times of over generation;3 CSE’s recommendation for the Commission to explore
“rates and demand response programs that are more dynamic and reflective of the needs of the
grid;”4 and, AMS’s recommendation to align demand charges with periods when the grid is not
in an oversupply condition.5
Some, if not all, of the rate design considerations raised by parties in comments are
3 See: Tesla Comments at p. 5. 4 See: Center for Sustainable Energy’s Comments at p. 1. 5 See: AMS Comments at p. 7.
4
already being addressed in various rate design proceedings. For example, SCE is addressing the
subject of electricity pricing during periods of generation oversupply by proposing new time-of-
use (TOU) periods in its 2016 Rate Design Window (RDW) Application (A.16-09-003) that
align with the oversupply generation cost profile. SCE is also proposing new distribution
demand charge structures in its 2018 General Rate Case (GRC) Phase 2 Application.6 The new
demand charge structures would recover distribution-related cost through a fixed, dollar-per-
kilowatt grid component7 and a time-variant component recovered through dollar-per-kilowatt-
hour energy charges, or peak period dollar-per-kilowatt demand charges, depending on the
option. Furthermore, SCE is exploring new demand response rates through its 2018-2022
Demand Response Funding Application (A.17-01-022) and in the New Models for Demand
Response OIR (R.13-09-011).
The cost causation principle of setting electricity prices means that retail rate and demand
response program structures are inexorably tied to the marginal cost of service associated with
the respective groups customers in each program. The link between cost of service and retail
rates helps to mitigate inappropriate cost shifts between customer groups, and enables the
Commission to achieve equitable cost-based price signals. Because rate design proceedings
properly address the related issue between cost of service and rate structures, SCE recommends
the rate design and demand response program proposals made by various parties be addressed in
the appropriate ongoing proceedings. The Commission can also avoid duplication of effort by
continuing to address demand charge structures and demand response program design in the
ongoing proceedings rather than introducing a new record in this proceeding.
6 See: SCE’s 2018 GRC Phase 2 Application was filed on June 30, 2017. 7 The fixed Grid component is approximately 20% lower than the current distribution facilities related
demand charge.
5
B. Standards Must be Developed for Internal Metering Before Allowing Devices to Be
Used in Lieu of Utility Owned Meters
In their comments, Tesla recommends that device internal metering could be used in lieu
of utility-owned meters to assist in mitigating system costs;8 however, standards for such
metering devices and related meter and data services must be developed and implemented, akin
to the Commission adopted Direct Access Standards for Meter and Meter Data (DASMMD)9 for
third party owned or serviced meters, or to the protocols used in the third-party owned EV
submeter pilots,10 before such devices could be used to bill utility customers under Commission-
approved retail electricity tariffs. Importantly, such devices need to be revenue-grade, and the
related meter and data services need to conform to minimum standards developed by the
Commission for safety, accuracy and reliability of meter equipment, communications, meter data
management and meter reading, including rules for validating, editing and estimating meter
usage data, and meter installation, maintenance, testing and calibration.11
Other considerations include:
1) Internal meters, which are internal to inverters, cannot yet be accurately tested
with existing field testing equipment. Internal metering must be tested for
calibration on a routine basis as required by the Commission;
2) Internal inverters cannot currently be integrated with existing billing systems;
3) Certification procedures to allow internal meters to meet requirements for
8 See Tesla Comments at p. 12. 9 See SCE Rule 22.G, discussing requirements for unbundled meter services for Direct Access,
including the requirement (in G.1.d) that meters and meter services must conform to the standards set forth in the Direct Access Standards for Metering and Meter Data (“DASMMD”) as approved by the CPUC. The DASMMD is available at https://www.sce.com/wps/wcm/connect/6c452e80-05a7-47df-9b27 76e20b63a1e9/DirectAccessStandardsforMetering199903.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.
10 See e.g., SCE’s Schedule PEVSP Phases 1 and 2. 11 Pursuant to state law, the Commission has authority over any measuring instrument (i.e., meter or
submeter) used by the utilities in connection with measuring electricity service subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction. See Section 12510(a)(4) of Division 5, Chapter 5 of the California Business and Professions (B&P) Code, which governs weighing and measuring devices.
6
communication, testing, and calibration must be further developed.
C. CESA’s Recommendation for the Commission to Authorize All Forms of Allowed
Performance Measures for MUAs Violates Jurisdictional Regulations and Should
Be Dismissed
In their comments, CESA acknowledges that some performance measurement structures
established and enforced in the WDAT are not jurisdictional to the CAISO or the Commission.
In these cases, CESA recommends that the Commission “exercise its jurisdictional authority
over distribution system investor-owned utilities to direct them to pursue changes needed in their
WDAT to reasonably accommodate MUAs.”12
The concept of jurisdiction applies to government agencies, and the CAISO is not such
an entity. As such, any tariff rule or obligation relevant to this proceeding, including a
"performance measurement structure" would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission or
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC is the agency that has jurisdiction
over the CAISO Tariff; the CAISO does not have jurisdiction over itself as CESA implies. The
WDAT is FERC-jurisdictional and, thus, just like any performance measurement structure in the
CAISO Tariff, any such structure in the WDAT, to the extent any even exist, would be subject to
FERC's jurisdiction.
Second, the recommendation that the Commission order the IOUs to amend their
WDATs should be dismissed, as such action is outside of the jurisdiction of the Commission. A
state commission does not have the authority to compel the utilities that it regulates on what they
may file at FERC. In Western Massachusetts Electric Company, 23 FERC ¶ 61,025 (1983),
1984), FERC rejected a utility’s filing on the grounds that it was made under duress at the order
of the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU) and was therefore contrary to the
12 See: CESA Comments at p. 17.
7
Commerce Clause and the Federal Power Act (FPA). The First Circuit affirmed, finding that
allowing a state commission to order a utility to make a FERC filing would be "to allow a state
to do what FERC itself cannot, namely, to change an interstate rate practice that FERC has not
found unreasonable." 729 F.2d at 888.
D. CESA’s “Look back” Proposal Creates Opportunities for Market Manipulation and
Should Be Dismissed
In their comments, CESA proposes a “look back” or “LIFO” approach to BTM wholesale
charging rules.13 Under this “look back” approach, the rate treatment of charging energy (i.e.,
wholesale or retail) is not determined at the time of charging, but is instead determined following
the discharge of energy, depending upon whether the energy is exported to the grid or consumed
on site. Thus, the charging transaction would be determined retroactively based on the discharge
transaction: “Only when energy is supplied to the grid is a customer eligible for wholesale
treatment. It is not possible to know a customer’s future performance so only when they meet
this requirement is a wholesale settlement activated.”14 Under CESA’s proposal, if a customer
exports to the grid, the device would “look back” and find the most recent charging activity.
This activity would then be deemed wholesale, and a wholesale transaction would be created
retroactively.
CESA’s proposed approach results in the potential for a gaming opportunity whereby a
customer could determine retroactively whether the charging energy will be wholesale, after the
price is published, simply by modifying operations to export energy (or not). Thus, if the
customer observes a favorable wholesale price, the customer may choose to export the energy
and take advantage of that price. If the customer observes the price is unfavorable, the customer
could consume the energy onsite, and pay the regular retail rate. This after-the-fact choice is not
13 CESA Opening Comments at Appendix page 1; see “Configuration 1.” 14 Ibid.
8
allowed in the current marketplace; schedules are determined in advance, and deviations are
handled by settling at the real time price, not by modifying (or creating new) transactions that
that take place in past time periods.
CESA later appears to recognize this issue in their comments, noting that “under the
hypothetical example, a customer would presumably contemplate this if they saw they had
charged during a period of negative wholesale prices, and so would want exposure to those
prices. The bad-actor would then theoretically take actions to make their past charging
categorized as ‘wholesale.’ ”15 CESA proposes this situation could be remedied by basing the
device’s charging activity on a pre-determined schedule into the wholesale market. SCE
strongly supports a requirement that any wholesale activity for a BTM device must only occur
according to a pre-determined CAISO schedule and be settled appropriately. Such requirements
were key elements of SCE’s proposed protocols to enable BTM wholesale charging.16 The
requirement for such a schedule – and the fact that CAISO settlements will be created according
to this schedule regardless of actual operations – help avoid the potential for gaming
opportunities to occur via retroactive transactions.
As CESA rightly points out, CAISO participants have the option to deviate from the
schedule, but they cannot retroactively modify the previous schedule. As CESA clarifies:
“market schedules are binding, and any failure to deliver on a schedule will be settled through
‘buying back’ one’s position at wholesale prices in the applicable intervals.”17 In other words,
deviations are handled by appropriate settlements in the present; a customer may never void a
settlement in the past, or retroactively create a new settlement.
Should a predetermined CAISO schedule be required (with CAISO settlements
determined to occur according to the schedule), then CESA may be correct that “this concern is
inapplicable.” However, CESA’s proposed “look back” approach contradicts CESA’s previous
15 CESA Opening Comments at 19. 16 SCE Opening Comments at Appendix A. 17 CESA Opening Comments at 19.
9
assumption that a predetermined CAISO schedule is required: As noted above, the “look back”
approach explicitly states that “a wholesale settlement [is] activated”18 for the charging energy
only after the discharge has occurred. This indicates that a pre-determined wholesale schedule
has not been established for the resource. Thus, because of the opportunity created for gaming
and market manipulation, CESA’s look-back approach should be rejected.
E. State and Federal Jurisdictional and Operational Issues Associated with NEM-
Paired Storage Projects Need to be Addressed Before Expanded MUA Case are
Permitted
SunRun claims that the Joint Staff Proposal correctly points out (contrary to SCE's
urging) that the Commission has no policy prohibiting "NEM storage resources"19 from
"participating in wholesale energy markets."20 SCE logically assumes that "participating in
wholesale energy markets means selling energy at wholesale." It responds to SunRun based on
that understanding. The notion of a NEM resource selling energy at wholesale to a party other
than its interconnected utility raises several legal and jurisdictional issues.
In real-time, a NEM resource provides the energy it produces that is not consumed by the
load of its associated retail customer (i.e., its "excess energy") to its interconnected utility in
exchange for a retail bill credit and surplus compensation at an avoided cost rate if the excess
energy exceeds the delivered energy over a 12-month period. The current NEM tariffs do not
permit the NEM customer to pick and choose how to dispose of its excess energy or to sell such
energy to an entity other than the host. If a NEM resource—which is required to be a qualifying
18 CESA Opening Comments at Appendix page 1; see “Configuration 1.” 19 SCE assumes that "NEM storage resources" refers to storage resources paired with (renewable) NEM
that meet the requirements set forth for such pairings of D.14-05-033. SCE notes that this proceeding has largely focused on battery storage devices that would be charged from the grid (not those that meet the strict requirements of D.14-05-033). In any case NEM storage resources that do meet the requirements of D.14-05-033 still cannot sell energy to third parties and remain eligible for NEM treatment.
20 SunRun Comments at p. 10.
10
facility—were to sell energy to a third party, FERC law would first require the resource to have
a FERC-jurisdictional interconnection agreement.21 If the NEM resource lacks a FERC-
jurisdictional interconnection agreement (which they all do), it would first need to acquire one to
sell to an entity other than its host.
Later in its comments, SunRun indicates that it was not discussing NEM resources selling
excess energy into the CAISO, but a non-NEM storage system (that is behind the same meter as
an NEM resource) that is selling energy to the CAISO market.22 Any such storage device would
likely not be considered an eligible qualifying facility, such that the storage resource selling
energy to the CAISO market would need FERC-jurisdictional interconnection service under the
WDAT. It would also need to have a market-based rate tariff on file at FERC, under current
FERC policies. Multiple meters separately measuring the storage and NEM resources might be
required by the WDAT under such a scenario, and, in any case, likely would be needed to ensure
that energy produced by the non-qualifying facility storage resource is not credited at the retail
rate or provided surplus compensation under the NEM Tariff.
SunRun also suggests allowing NEM customers to forego bill credits to provide an
incremental basis for compensation.23 The existing NEM tariffs would have to be amended to
provide for this optionality and implementation could prove impractical or cost prohibitive. For
example, there would have to be provisions to address how far in advance the NEM customer
would have to decide whether it was seeking NEM bill credits versus another form of
compensation and the net surplus compensation true-up process would also need to be modified.
Additionally, if the NEM customer has the ability under the NEM Tariff (a CPUC-jurisdictional
tariff) to sell a FERC-jurisdictional product to an entity other than its interconnected utility, it
21 See Western Massachusetts Electric Co., 61 FERC ¶ 61,182 at 61,661-62 (1992), aff’d sub nom, Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. FERC, 165 F.3d 922, 925-27 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (WMECo) (holding QF interconnections FERC-jurisdictional if energy is sold to any entity other than the host (interconnected) utility).
22 Id. at 11. 23 Id. at 12.
11
would need FERC-jurisdictional interconnection service. For example, the very reason that the
interconnections of NEM resources that can receive Net Surplus Compensation are state-
jurisdictional is that the relevant tariff limits the ability of the customer to sell to entities other
than the host utility.
In sum, there are both state and federal jurisdictional and operational issues associated
with NEM-paired storage projects participating in MUAs that need to be considered and
addressed before any expanded MUA use cases are permitted.
III.
CONCLUSION
SCE appreciates the opportunity to file these Reply Comments and looks forward to
continuing to work with the Commission, CAISO, and stakeholders to realize the vision of
energy storage systems to stack incremental value and revenue streams by delivering multiple
services to the wholesale market, transmission system, distribution grid, and end users.
Respectfully submitted, JANET S. COMBS AMBER DEAN WYATT
/s/ Janet S. Combs By: Janet S. Combs
Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-1524 Facsimile: (626) 302-3990 E-mail: [email protected]
June 30, 2017
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Order Instituting Rulemaking to consider policy and implementation refinements to the Energy Storage Procurement Framework and Design Program (D.13-10-040, D.14-10-045) and related Action Plan of the California Energy Storage Roadmap.
Rulemaking 15-03-011 (Filed March 26, 2015)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of the REPLY COMMENTS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) ON JOINT STAFF PROPOSAL ON MULTIPLE USE APPLICATIONS FOR ENERGY STORAGE on all parties identified on the attached service list A.15-03-011. Service was effected by one or more means indicated below:
Transmitting the copies via e-mail to ALJ Michelle Cooke and all parties who have provided an e-mail address.
Placing the copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered by hand or by overnight courier to the offices of the Commissioner(s) or other addressee(s).
Commissioner Carla Peterman California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102
Executed on June 30, 2017, at Rosemead, California.
/s/ AnnMarie Lett AnnMarie Lett Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
PROCEEDING: R1503011 - CPUC - OIR TO CONSID FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: JUNE 29, 2017
DOWNLOAD THE COMMA-DELIMITED FILE ABOUT COMMA-DELIMITED FILES
Back to Service Lists Index
C.C. SONG CODY HILL REGULATORY ANALYST MGR. ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS MARIN CLEAN ENERGY LS POWER DEVELOPMENT, LLC EMAIL ONLY 5000 HOPYARD ROAD EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 PLEASANTON, CA 00000 FOR: MARIN CLEAN ENERGY FOR: LS POWER DEVELOPMENT, LLC
KENNETH SAHM WHITE PATRICK FERGUSON DIR - ECONOMIC & POLICY ANALYSIS ATTORNEY CLEAN COALITION DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CLEAN COALITION FOR: CALPINE CORPORATION
SHANNON EDDY TED KO LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION STEM. INC. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION FOR: STEM, INC.
ANDREW M JAMIESON JOHNNY J. PONG COUNSEL - REGULATORY AND LEGISLATIVE SENIOR COUNSEL ITC HOLDINGS CORPORATION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 27175 ENERGY WAY 555 WEST FIFTH ST., STE. 1400 NOVI, MI 48377 LOS ANGELES, CA 90013-1034 FOR: ITC GRID DEVELOPMENT, LLC (ITC FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY GRID) (SOCAL) PONG IS REP AS OF 3/2/16 EMAIL
CPUC Home
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONService Lists
STEVEN ZURETTI JEFFREY A. SERFASS DIR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS MANAGING DIRECTOR BROOKFIELD ENERGY MARKETING INC. CALIFORNIA HYDROGEN BUSINESS COUNCIL 601 S. FIGUEROA ST., STE. 2200 3438 MERRIMAC ROAD LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 FOR: BROOKFIELD ENERGY MARKETING INC. FOR: CALIFORNIA HYDROGEN BUSINESS COUNCIL
J. DOUGLAS DIVINE JESSALYN ISHIGO CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OFF. EAGLE CREST ENERGY COMPANY AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. 3000 OCEAN PARK BVLD., STE. 1020 1919 TORRANCE BLVD. SANTA MONICA, CA 90405 TORRANCE, CA 90501 FOR: EAGLE CREST ENERGY COMPOANY FOR: AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.
DANIEL W. DOUGLASS MAX BAUMHEFNER ATTORNEY LEGAL FELLOW DOUGLASS & LIDDELL NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL 4766 PARK GRANADA, SUITE 209 111 SUTTER ST., 21ST FLOOR CALABASAS, CA 91302 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 91404 FOR: ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS FOR: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL (AREM), DIRECT ACCESS CUSTOMER (NRDC) COALITION (DACC), WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM (WPTF)
JONATHAN WORD AMBER WYATT DIR OF STRATEGIC OPERATIONS SR. ATTORNEY BISON PEAK PUMPED STORAGE, LLC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 9795 CABRINI DR., STE. 206 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. G.O.1, RM 345E BURBANK, CA 91504 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 FOR: BISON PEAK PUMPED STORAGE, LLC FOR: SOUTHERN CALFIORNIA EDISON COMPANY
GREG BASS DONALD C. LIDDELL DIR ATTORNEY NOBLE AMERICAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 401 WEST A STREET, SUITE 500 2928 2ND AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-3017 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 FOR: NOBLE AMERICAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC FOR: CALIFORNIA ENERGY STORAGE ALLIANCE (CESA)
DONALD C. LIDDELL, PC JOHN W. LESLIE, ESQ COUNSEL ATTORNEY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL DENTONS US LLP 2928 2ND AVENUE 4655 EXECUTIVE DRIVE, SUITE 700 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 FOR: POWERTREE SERVICES, INC. FOR: SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P.
E. GREGORY BARNES KELLY RODGERS ATTORNEY ENERGY PROGRAM MANAGER SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, BLDG 3. CP32D 4677 OVERLAND AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR: SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SACHU CONSTANTINE GUSTAVO E. LUNA DIR. OF POLICY VP - ORIGINATION CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TERRA-GEN POWER, LLC 9325 SKY PARK COURT, SUITE 100 11512 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 370 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 FOR: CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FOR: TERRA-GEN POWER, LLC
JOSHUA BLEDSOE CHRISTOPHER J. GRIECO LATHAM & WATKINS LLP EXECUTIVE V.P. 650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, 20TH FLOOR GRAVITY POWER, LLC COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1925 5735B HOLLISTER AVENUE, STE. B FOR: ALEVO ENERGY, INC. GOLETA, CA 93117 FOR: GRAVITY POWER, LLC
EDWARD G. CAZALET DAVID MACMILLAN CEO PRESIDENT TEMIX, INC. MEGAWATT STORAGE FARMS, INC 101 FIRST STREET, STE. 552 3931 JEFFERSON AVE LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022 WOODSIDE, CA 94062 FOR: TEMIX, INC. FOR: MEGAWATT STORAGE FARMS, INC.
MARC D. JOSEPH ANAND DURVASULA ADAMS, BROADWELL, JOSEPH & CARDOZO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 601 GATEWAY BLVD., STE. 1000 LEGAL DIVISION SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 ROOM 4107 FOR: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY 505 VAN NESS AVENUE EMPLOYEES (CCUE) SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA
HAYLEY GOODSON SERJ BERELSON STAFF ATTORNEY MGR - REGULATORY STRATEGY THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK SUNVERGE ENERGY, INC. 785 MARKET ST., STE. 1400 950 MINNA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 FOR: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK FOR: SUNVERGE ENERGY, INC. (SUNVERGE)
NORA SHERIFF LARISSA KOEHLER ALCANTAR & KAHL, LLP SENIOR ATTORNEY 345 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 2450 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 123 MISSION STREET, 28TH FLOOR FOR: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 ASSOCIATION (CLECA) FOR: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND (EDF)
SHERIDAN J. PAUKER, ESQ. F. JACKSON STODDARD REGULATORY COUNSEL ATTORNEY WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP ONE MARKET PLAZA, SPEAR TOWER, STE 3300 ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1126 FOR: ROBERT BOSCH LLC FOR: ICE ENERGY
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI & DAY, LLP PO BOX 7442, B30A-2467 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94106 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR: INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS (PG&E) ASSOCIATION (IEP)
JAMES D. SQUERI MICHAEL DAY ATTORNEY GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI & DAY LLP GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI & DAY, LLP 505 SANSOME STREET, STE. 900 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: ABENGOA SOLAR FOR: COMMERCIAL ENERGY
SEAN P. BEATTY YANA GARCIA WEST REGION GEN. COUNSEL EARTHJUSTICE NRG ENERGY, INC, 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 500 100 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: SIERRA CLUB FOR: NRG ENERGY, INC.
MANAL YAMOUT MEGAN M. MYERS VP - POLICY & MARKETS ATTORNEY ADVANCED MICROGRID SOLUTIONS LAW OFFICES OF SARA STECK MYERS 25 STILLMAN STREET 122 - 28TH AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121 FOR: ADVANCED MICROGRID SOLUTIONS FOR: CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIES (CEERT)
SARAH VAN CLEVE TIM LINDL ENERGY POLICY ADVISOR COUNSEL TESLA, INC. KEYES & FOX LLP 3500 DEER CREEK ROAD 436 14TH STREET, STE. 1305 PALO ALTO, CA 94304 OAKLAND, CA 94612 FOR: TESLA, INC. FOR: SONOMA CLEAN POWER AUTHORITY
TIM LINDL GREGORY MORRIS KEYES & FOX, LLP DIRECTOR 436 14TH STREET, SUITE 1305 GREEN POWER INSTITUTE OAKLAND, CA 94612 2039 SHATTUCK AVENUE, STE 402 FOR: SUNRUN, INC. BERKELEY, CA 94704 FOR: THE GREEN POWER INSTITUTE (A PROGRAM OF THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE)
COLLEEN QUINN DAN VICKERY V.P.-GOV'T. RELATIONS & PUBLIC POLICY DIR - MRKT DEVELOPMNT AND POLICY CHARGEPOINT, INC. GREEN CHARGE NETWORKS LLC 254 EAST HACIENDA AVENUE 4151 BURTON DR. CAMPBELL, CA 95008 SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 FOR: CHARGEPOINT, INC. FOR: GREEN CHARGE NETWORKS LLC
DAVID KATES BILL WEAVER DAVID MARK & COMPANY CALIFORNIA ISO 3510 UNOCAL PLACE, SUITE 200 250 OUTCROPPING WAY SANTA ROSA, CA 95403 FOLSOM, CA 95630 FOR: THE NEVADA HYDRO COMPANY FOR: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM
MATTHEW SWINDLE LAURA TAYLOR CEO & FOUNDER BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. NLINE ENERGY, INC. 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 5170 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PARKWAY SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762 FOR: SONOMA CLEAN POWER AUTHORITY FOR: NLINE ENERGY, INC.
REBECCA FRANKLIN STEVEN P. DOUGLAS REGULATORY ADVOCATE SR. DIR - ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ASSOCIATION OF CALIF. WATER AGENCIES ALLIANCE OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS 910 K STREET, STE. 100 1415 L STREET, STE. 1190 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA WATER FOR: ALLIANCE OF AUTOMOBILE AGENCIES (ACWA) MANUFACTURERS
TY TOSDAL LAURA TAYLOR OF COUNSEL ATTORNEY BRAUN BALISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. 915 L. STREET, SUITE 1270 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95822 FOR: CITY OF LANCASTER FOR: SILICON VALLEY CLEAN ENERGY AUTHORITY
VIRINDER SINGH DIR - REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY 1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1880 PORTLAND, OR 97205 FOR: EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY
AARON (YICHEN) LU ALIA SCHOEN PROGRAM COORDINATOR PUBLIC POLICY MGR. CITY OF SAN DIEGO BLOOM ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
AMY BARR ANDREW CAMPBELL PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EXEC. DIR., ENERGY INSTITUTE AT HAAS EMAIL ONLY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
ANNE SMART BARBARA BARKOVICH CHARGEPOINT, INC. CONSULTANT EMAIL ONLY BARKOVICH & YAP EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
BRIAN THEAKER CASE COORDINATION DIRECTOR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY NRG ENERGY, INC. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
DANIELLE O. MILLS DANIELLE OSBORNE MILLS SR. POLICY ADVISOR SENIOR POLICY ADVISOR LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
DESPINA NIEHAUS DIANE FELLMAN CALIFORNIA REGULATORY AFAIRS DIR - GOVERNMENTAL & REGULATORY AFFAIRS SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY NRG ENERGY, INC. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
ELI HARLAND JAMES A. BISHARA CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION REGULATORY AFFAIRS ANALYST ENERGY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DIV. CAISO EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
JAMES HALL JAMIE HALL MGR.- ADVANCED VEHICLE AND INFRA. POLICY ADVANCED VEHICLE AND INFRASTRUCTURE GENERAL MOTORS LLC GENERAL MOTORS, LLC EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
JONATHAN HART KATIE JORRIE CENTER FOR SJUSATINABLE ENERGY DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CALPINE CORPORATION
LORRAINE PASKETT LORRAINE PASKETT EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
MAGGIE CHAN MARC COSTA PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY COALITION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
MATTHEW BARMACK MATTHEW TISDALE DIRECTOR, MARKET & REGULATORY ANALYSIS EMAIL ONLY CALPINE CORPORATION EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
MCE REGULATORY MICHAEL NGUYEN MARIN CLEAN ENERGY ENERGY COALITION
EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
NELLIE TONG PETER T. PEARSON SENIOR CONSULTANT ENERGY SUPPLY SPECIALIST DNV KEMA ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
PRAMOD KULKARNI RACHEL GOLDEN CUSTOMIZED ENERGY SOLUTIONS NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
REBECCA FEUERLICHT ROLA HALAWANJI CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PROJECT MANAGER EMAIL ONLY ENERGY COALITION EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
SEPHRA A. NINOW TIM OLSEN REGULATORY AFFAIRS MGR. ENERGY COALITION CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
UDI HELMAN WADE A. GREENACRE HELMAN ANALYTICS CASE MGR. EMAIL ONLY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
REGULATORY DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
MRW & ASSOCIATES, LLC TAM HUNT EMAIL ONLY COMMUNITY RENEWABLES SOLUTIONS, LLC EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000-0000
SANDER K. COHAN DENISE GRAB DIRECTOR, INNOVATION SR. ATTORNEY ENEL GREEN POWER NORTH AMERICA, INC. INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY 1 TECH DRIVE, SUITE 220 139 MACDOUGAL STREET, 3RD FL. ANDOVER, MA 01810 NEW YORK, NY 10012
DINA ABDULHADI ARMAN TABATABAI INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY RESEARCH NYU LAW SCHOOL MORGAN STANLEY 139 MACDOUGAL ST., 3RD FL. 1585 BROADWAY, 38TH FL. NEW YORK, NY 10012 NEW YORK, NY 10036
JEFF GATES KATHERINE HOFFMASTER DIRECTOR OF SALES & FIELD OPERATIONS SR. REGULATORY AFFAIRS ANALYST ALEVO ENERGY, INC. NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES 2320 CONCORD PARKWAY SOUTH 700 UNIVERSE BLVD., FEJ/JB CONCORD, NC 28027 JUNO BEACH, FL 33405
ARTHUR H. SIEGAL CHRIS NEVERS ATTORNEY AT LAW ALLIANCE OF AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS JAFFE, RAITT, HEUER & WEISS 2000 TOWN CENTER, STE.1140 27777 FRANKLIN ROAD, SUITE 2500 SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075 SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034 FOR: GREEN CHARGE NETWORKS LLC
TONY SIEBERT KELLY CRANDALL ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION EQ RESEARCH, LLC N93 W14475 WHITTAKER WAY 1400 16TH ST., 16 MARKET SQR., STE. 400 MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051 DENVER, CO 80202
LON W. HOUSE, PH.D JOE GRECO WATER & ENERGY CONSULTING SR. V.P. 10645 N. ORACLE RD., STE 121-216 TERRA-GEN POWER LLC ORO VALLEY, AZ 85737 9590 PROTOTYPE COURT, SUITE 200 FOR: WEC RENO, NV 89521-5916
KENDRA TALLEY THOMAS ASHLEY CASE MGR. DIR - GOVN'T AFFAIRS & PUBLIC POLICY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY GREENLOTS 555 W. FIFTH STREET, GT14D6 925 N. LA BREA AVENUE, 6TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CA 90013 LOS ANGELES, CA 90038
MILISSA MARONA GREGORY S. G. KLATT DIR - GOV'T & UTILITY RELATIONS ATTORNEY CODA ENERGY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 135 E. MAPLE AVE. 4766 PARK GRANADA, STE. 209 MONROVIA, CA 91016 CALABASAS, CA 91302
CASE ADMINISTRATION MARCIE MILNER SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VP - REGULATORY AFFAIRS 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE., PO BOX 800 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P. ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 4445 EASTGATE MALL, SUITE 100 SAN DIEGO, CA 92121
KELLY FOLEY HANNON RASOOL PILOT POWER GROUP ADMIN. - CALIF. REGULATORY AFFAIRS 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER LANE, SUITE 520 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 8330 CENTURY PARK CT. CP32D SAN DIEGO, CA 92123
STEVEN LANGO WILLIAM P. FULLER REGULATORY CASE MGR - II REGULATORY CASE ADMINISTRATOR SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 CENTURY PARK CT., CP-31H 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32D
JEVON POTTS ANDREW YIP LATHAM & WATKINS LLP MGR - BUS. DEVELOPMENT (RBNA/PJ-BGT) 12670 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE ROBERT BOSCH LLC SAN DIEGO, CA 92130 101 JEFFERSON DRIVE MENLO PARK, CA 94025
ANTHONY HARRISON SUE MARA MGR. - REGULATORY AFFAIRS CONSULTANT STEM, INC. RTO ADVISORS, LLC 100 ROLLINS RD. 164 SPRINGDALE WAY MILLBRAE, CA 94030 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94062 FOR: ALLAINCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS (AREM)
DAVID A. SILBERMAN JOSEPH F. WIEDMAN GENERAL COUNSEL SR. REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE ANALYST SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY AUTHORITY 400 COUNTY CENTER, 6TH FL. 400 COUNTY CENTER, SIXTH FL. REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 FOR: PENINSULA CLEAN ENERGY AUTHORITY
STEVE TABER MILA A. BUCKNER ENERGY MARKETS ATTORNEY EMOTORWERKS ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO 846 BRANSTEN ROAD 601 GATEWAY BLVD., STE. 1000 SAN CARLOS, CA 94070 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080
CANDICE YU HILARY STAVER ENERGY STORAGE BUS. DEVELOPMNT REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE ANALYST MERCEDES-BENZ RESEARCH & DEVELOP SILICON VALLEY CLEAN ENERGY AUTHORITY 309 N. PASTORIA AVENUE 333 W. EL CAMINO REAL, STE. 290 SUNNYVALE, CA 94085 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 FOR: MERCEDES-BENZ RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT NORTH AMERICA, INC.
JOSEPH D. PETTA SKY STANFIELD SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP 396 HAYES STREET 396 HAYS STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102
ERIC BORDEN CANDICE YU ENERGY POLICY ANALYST ASSOCIATE, ADVANCED SOLUTIONS THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK SUNEDISON 785 MARKET STREET, STE. 1400 44 MONTGOMERY STREET, 2200 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
STEPHANIE WANG BILL KISSINGER POLICY DIR MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP CALIFORNIA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER 369 PINE STREET, STE.300 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
GRACE HSU RYAN MANN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. ONE MARKET PLZ, SPEAR TWR,STE.3300 ONE MARKET STREET, SPEAR TOWER, STE 1200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
MONICA SCHWEBS ANDY SCHWARTZ MORGAN LEWIS BOCKIUS, LLP TESLA, INC. ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER 444 DE HARO ST., STE. 101 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1596 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107
FRANCESCA WAHL ADENIKE ADEYEYE SR. ASSOCIATE, BUS. DEVELOPMENT SR. RESEARCH & POLICY ANALYST TESLA, INC. EARTHJUSTICE 444 DE HARO STREET, STE. 101 50 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 500 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
ANNA MURVEIT JOHN MCINTYRE CALIFORNIA EMVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES ATTORNEY 423 WASHINGTON ST. 4TH FL. GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI & DAY, LLP SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
LUISA F. ELKINS MATTHEW VESPA GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI & DAY, LLP ATTORNEY 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 EARTHJUSTICE, CALIF. OFFICE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, STE. 500 SAN FRRANCISCO, CA 94111
RIKKI WEBER WILLIAM ROSTOV LITIGATION ASSISTANT STAFF ATTORNEY EARTHJUSTICE EARTHJUSTICE 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 500 50 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 500 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: SIERRA CLUB
NADIA MARQUEZ MEGHA LAKHCHAURA MGR - POLICY & MARKETS DIR. PUBLIC POLICY ADVANCED MICROGRID SOLUTIONS SUNRUN INC 25 STILLMAN STREET, STE. 200 595 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94114 SAN FRANCISOC, CA 94115
CALIFORNIA ENERGY MARKETS CHARLES R. MIDDLEKAUFF 425 DIVISADERO ST., STE 303 ATTORNEY SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 77 BEALE STREET, B30A, PO BOX 7442 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120
RANDALL J. LITTENEKER SARA STECK MYERS ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY LAW OFFICES OF SARA STECK MYERS PO BOX 7442, B30A 122 - 28TH AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121
MATTHEW R. GONZALES SHARMILA RAVULA MGR. - REGULATORY DIR - BUS. DEVELOP. RBNA/PJ-DC MICROGRIDPACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ROBERT BOSCH LLC PO BOX 770000 4009 MIRANDA AVENUE, SUITE 200 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94177-0001 PALO ALTO, CA 94304
BONNIE DATTA EMMIE STENSTEDT SIEMENS USA ELSYS INC. 4000 E. THIRD AVENUE 4966 HUMMINGBIRD ROAD FOSTER CITY, CA 94404 PLEASANTON, CA 94566
BEVIN HONG KATHY TRELEVEN UTILITY SALES DIRECTOR KATHY TRELEVEN CONSULTING ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION 103 BANDOL CT. 43 WOODLAND CT. SAN RAMON, CA 94582 SAN RAMON, CA 94582
AJ HOWARD NAOR DELEANU OLIVINE, INC. OLIVINE, INC. 2010 CROW CANYON PLACE, STE. 100 2010 CROW CANYON PL. NO. 100 SAN RAMO, CA 94583 SAN RAMON, CA 94583
SPENCE GERBER MARK STOUT OLIVINE, INC. V.P.-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2010 CROW CANYON PL NO. 100 AMBER KINETICS, INC. SAN RAMON, CA 94583 32920 ALVARADO NILES RD., STE. 250 UNION CITY, CA 94587
CYNTHIA CLARK JASON B. KEYES MANAGER, WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PROGRAM ATTORNEY UNIV. OF CALIF. - OFFICE OF THE PRES. KEYES & FOX LLP 111 BROADWAY . SUITE 1472 436 14TH STREET, STE. 1305 OAKLAND, CA 94607 OAKLAND, CA 94612 FOR: TESLA, INC.
PAUL D. HERNANDEZ SAMUEL J. HARVEY POLICY MGR. KEYES & FOX LLP CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY 436 41TH STREET, SUITE 1305 426 17TH STREET, STE. 700 OAKLAND, CA 94612 OAKLAND, CA 94612
SAMUEL J. HARVEY RON PERRY KEYES & FOX LLP CEO 436 14TH STREET, SUITE 1305 COMMERCIAL ENERGY SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94612 7767 OAKPORT ST., STE. 525 OAKLAND, CA 94621
JIN NOH PHILLIP MULLER SR. CONSULTANT PRESIDENT STRATEGEN CONSULTING SCD ENERGY SOLUTIONS 2150 ALLSTON WAY, STE.210 436 NOVA ALBION WAY BERKELEY, CA 94709 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903
DEDRICK ROPER C. SUSIE BERLIN CHARGEPOINT, INC. LAW OFFICES OF SUSIE BERLIN 254 EAST HACIENDA AVENUE 1346 THE ALAMEDA, STE. 7, NO. 141 CAMPBELL, CA 95008 SAN JOSE, CA 95126
MOHAMMED S. ALRAI DEBRA EMERSON PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE SONOMA CLEAN POWER AUTHORITY RAIENERGY INTERNATIONAL 50 SANTA ROSA AVE., 5TH FL. 1299 DEL MAR AVENUE, SUITE 110 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 SAN JOSE, CA 95128
STEVEN S. SHUPE DELPHINE HOU GENERAL COUNSEL CALIF. INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS OPERATOR SONOMA CLEAN POWER AUTHORITY 250 OUTCROPPING WAY 50 SANTA ROSA AVE., 5TH FL. FOLSOM, CA 95630 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404
JILL POWERS JORDAN PINJUV CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR COUNSEL 250 OUTCROPPING WAY CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR FOLSOM, CA 95630 250 OUTCROPPING WAY FOLSOM, CA 95630
LEGAL DEPARTMENT PETER KLAUER CALIFORNIA ISO CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR 250 OUTCROPPING WAY 250 OUTCROPPING WAY FOLSOM, CA 95630 FOLSOM, CA 95630
LORENZO KRISTOV REGULATORY MGR. CALIFORNIA ISO WELLHEAD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 250 OUTCROPPING WAY 650 BERCUT DRIVE, STE C FOLSOM, CA 95630-8773 SACRAMENTO, CA 95811
BRAD HEAVNER CAMILLE STOUGH, ESQ. POLICY DIR. BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH PC CALIFORNIA SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 1107 9TH ST., NO.820 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
DAN GRIFFITHS JUSTIN WYNNE ATTORNEY ATTORNEY BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
KEVIN WOODRUFF LAURA GRAY WOODRUFF EXPERT SERVICES ENERGY STORAGE POLICY ADVISOR 1127 - 11TH STREET, SUITE 514 CALIFORNIA SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 95814
ENERGY SYSTEM RESEARCH OFFICE BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 1516 9TH STREET, MS-43 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
SCOTT BLAISING STEVEN KELLY COUNSEL POLICY DIRECTOR BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSCIATION 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 1215 K STREET, STE. 900 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
CHASE KAPPEL ANDREW B. BROWN ELLISON SCHNEIDER HARRIS & DONLAN LLP ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 2600 CAPITOL AVE., SUITE 400 2600 CAPITOL AVE, SUITE 400 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-5905
DOUGLAS K. KERNER JEFFERY D. HARRIS ATTORNEY AT LAW ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS, LLP 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-5905 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-5905
LYNN M. HAUG WILLIAM WESTERFIELD, III ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP SR. ATTORNEY, OFF OF GEN. COUNSEL 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT SACRMENTO, CA 95816-5905 6301 S STREET, MS A311 FOR: CHARGEPOINT, INC. SACRAMENTO, CA 95817 FOR: SMUD
ANN L. TROWBRIDGE JULIE GILL ATTORNEY AT LAW DIRECTOR OF REGULATORY & GOV'T AFFAIRS DAY CARTER & MURPHY LLP AES US WEST 3620 AMERICAN RIVER DRIVE, SUITE 205 PO BOX 3066 SACRAMENTO, CA 95864 YUBA CITY, CA 95992 FOR: GILL RANCH STORAGE, LLC
JACK ELLIS HEATHER CURLEE 1425 ALPINE WAY / PO BOX 6600 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI TAHOE CITY, CA 96145-6600 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5100 SEATTLE, WA 98104
SHAUN LOGUE VP - LEGAL SRVCS & GEN. COUNCEL BROOKFIELD ENERGY MARKETING, INC. 480 BLVD. DE LA CITE GATINEAU, PQ J8T 8R3 CANADA
HAL KANE MARC MONBOUQUETTE SR. ANALYST, RISK ASSESSMENT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
CPUC - SED DIV ENERGY DIVISION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000
MICHELLE COOKE AMY C. BAKER ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT EMAIL ONLY ROOM 5210 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
ARTHUR J. O'DONNELL CHRISTOPHER MYERS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH AREA ROOM 4104 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
EHREN SEYBERT GABRIEL PETLIN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION COMMISSIONER PETERMAN DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, ANROOM 5303 AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
JEFFREY KWAN JOSE ALIAGA-CARO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING BROOM 4-A AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
KARIN M. HIETA MANISHA LAKHANPAL CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH COMMUNICATIONS AND WATER POLICY BRANCH ROOM 5010 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
NATHAN BARCIC PATRICK DOHERTY CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, ANAREA AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
RACHEL MCMAHON RICK TSE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH AREA AREA 2-D 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION LEGAL DIVISION ELECTRIC SAFETY AND RELIABILITY BRANCH AREA AREA 2-D 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
SHELLY LYSER SYED SAFVI CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAM ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH AREA AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 FOR: ORA
WHITNEY RICHARDSON XIAO SELENA HUANG CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION AREA 4-A ROOM 3-D 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214
LINDA KELLY DAVID CHAMBERS ELECTRICITY ANALYSIS OFFICE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 9TH STREET, MS-43 1516 9TH STREET, MS 20 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95614
JOHN MATHIAS TANNER KURAL ELECTRIC GENERATION SPECIALIST ENERGY ANALYST CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 NINTH STREET, MS 20 1500 5TH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
