+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bench Marking Lecture

Bench Marking Lecture

Date post: 10-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: atulshahi
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 28

Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    1/28

    BENECHMARKING -DEFINITION

    The continuous process ofmeasuring products, services, andpractices against the companystoughest competitors or thoserenowned as industry leaders

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    2/28

    Benchmarking is the practice of beinghumble enough to admit that someone

    else is better at something and wiseenough to try and learn how to match andeven surpass them at it.

    - APQC, 1998

    BENCHMARKING THOUGHTS

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    3/28

    BENCHMARKINGBENCHMARKING

    In sharp contrast to theconventional approach of settingthe future goals extrapolated from

    the internal practices and pasttrends.

    Since external environment andmarket conditions change rapidly;

    goal setting which is internallyfocused cant be true reflection ofcustomers expectations.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    4/28

    BENCHMARKINGBENCHMARKING

    Customers expectations are highlyliquid and are driven by standards

    set by best performer.Any product or service just below

    these standards may not catch the

    eyes of customer.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    5/28

    Why use BenchmarkingWhy use Benchmarking

    Survival lies in emulating best andnot in lagging behind

    Bench marking is time and costefficient because it involvesimitation and adaptation ratherthan pure invention. Prevents the

    Re-inventing the wheel.Quantum-leaps in performance

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    6/28

    Why use BenchmarkingWhy use Benchmarking

    An effective wake-up call and helps to makea strong case for change

    Practical ways in which step changes in

    performance can be achieved by learning fromothers who have already undertakencomparable changes

    The impetus for seeking new ways of doing

    things and promotes a culture that is receptiveto fresh approaches and ideas

    Opportunities for staff to learn new skills andbe involved in the transformation process fromthe outset.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    7/28

    Local industry is not yet well developedand is sprouting its wings.

    Cultural growth and professionalism isinchoate.

    The leading enterprises are foreignbased whether pharmaceuticals,automobiles or other FMCGs.

    These transnational companies havenurtured a professional culture.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    8/28

    The professional culture has paid TNCsin Pakistan through huge revenues.

    MNCS have small market share volumewise and high share price wise.

    National companies share is greatervolume wise and fewer revenues wise.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    9/28

    A list of top ten pharmaceuticalcompanies in Pakistan is filled with

    the MNCs

    Same situation exists in the

    beverages, automobile, electronicsand FMCGs.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    10/28

    Since TNCs are leading in thecompetition, they can be

    benchmarked by the strivingnational companies.

    Every aspect of the business

    where TNCs outperform their localcompetitors can be benchmarked.

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    11/28

    These aspects include

    Organizational cultureMarketing strategiesOperational activitiesFinancial aspectsHuman resourceOr any other aspect

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    12/28

    Types of BenchmarkingTypes of Benchmarking

    Internal benchmarking

    External benchmarking

    Functional benchmarking:

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    13/28

    Internal benchmarkingInternal benchmarking

    sharing opinions

    betweendepartmentswithin the sameorganisation

    ADVANTAGES:

    Easier to implement

    Easier to access data

    DISADVANTAGES:

    External ideas blocked

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    14/28

    External BenchmarkingExternal Benchmarking

    Comparison withexternal organisationsto discover new ideas,

    methods, products andservices.

    The gap betweeninternal and externalpractices displays the

    way where to changeand if there is anyneed to change.

    Advantages

    Helps to measureones ownperformance

    Helps to search forbest practices

    Disadvantages

    Takes time

    Requires support

    Legal/ethical isssues

    Industrial espionage

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    15/28

    Functional Benchmarking:Functional Benchmarking:

    Comparativeresearch to seekworld-class

    excellence bycomparing businessperformance notonly againstcompetitors but also

    against the bestbusinesses operatingin different industry

    Advantages:

    Discovering innovativepractices

    Disadvantage:

    Not suitable for every

    organisation

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    16/28

    Other Types of BenchmarkingOther Types of Benchmarking

    Product Benchmarking

    Process Benchmarking

    Strategic Benchmarking

    How companies compete, identify the winning

    strategies that have enable high-performingcompanies to be successful in their marketplaces.

    Parameter Benchmarking

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    17/28

    Gap Analysis (Spider chart)Gap Analysis (Spider chart)

    Current per r ance the h st

    Current per r ance the partner

    Current

    per

    r ance

    the h

    st

    rvariable K.

    est

    the best(current

    per

    r ance

    the partner

    rvariable A.

    tal customersatis

    action

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    18/28

    METHODOLOGY OF BENCHMARKINGMETHODOLOGY OF BENCHMARKING

    AT&TVs

    XEROX

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    19/28

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    20/28

    Clearly defined purpose

    Continual analysis & reassessment

    BM methodology must be appropriate

    Significance of results must be clear

    Conclusions must be justified by thedata

    Never compromise integrity for thesake of findings

    BENCHMARKING ESSENTIALS

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    21/28

    BENCHMARKING ESSENTIALSBENCHMARKING ESSENTIALS

    Investigation must be systematic

    A high code of ethics is essential

    Successful benchmarking requires a

    planned approach

    Requires senior management

    commitment

    Must establish & enforce milestones

    Must report findings to senior

    mangment

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    22/28

    Internal training for company

    personnel

    Access to a benchmarking database

    Professional BM analysts to support

    studies The process must be institutionalized!

    BENCHMARKING ESSENTIALS

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    23/28

    1. Fear of being seen as copying

    2. Fear of losing competitive advantage bysharing information

    3. Arrogance we are the best, whybenchmark?

    4. Benchmarking trap benchmark that

    which is convenient, but may not beimportant.

    Adapted from Watson 1992

    BARRIERS TO BENCHMARKING

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    24/28

    5. Impatience A quintessential trait

    6. Excuses are too easy:

    We are too small We are too busy

    We are too different

    Nobody else does what we do

    We do it better than anyone else

    Adapted from Watson 1992

    BARRIERS TO BENCHMARKING

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    25/28

    1. Key is to Adapt not adopt Deming

    2. Benchmarking does not come as a naturalprocess for many competitiveness does,but not benchmarking, because

    benchmarking requires a team approach.

    BENCHMARKING OBSERVATIONS

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    26/28

    Legal & Ethical GuidelinesLegal & Ethical Guidelines

    Keep it legal;

    Be willing to give what you get;

    Respect confidentiality;

    Keep information internal;

    Use benchmarking contacts;

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    27/28

  • 8/8/2019 Bench Marking Lecture

    28/28


Recommended