AGENDA
1. Introductions to Team and Process
2. BCSC Educational Vision
3. Understanding Stakeholder
Questions, Suggestions and Concerns
4. Next Steps
Steering Team
Dr. Jim Snapp Brownsburg Community Schools
Kat Jessup Brownsburg Community Schools
John Voigt Brownsburg Community Schools
Vicki Murphy Brownsburg Community Schools
Bret Daghe Brownsburg High School
Barry Gardner Brownsburg High School
Kert Boedicker Brownsburg High School
Kevin McGovern Meyer Najem
Jim Schellinger CSO Architects
John Rigsbee CSO Architects
Dr. Rosemary Rehak CSO Architects
Andy McNeilly CSO Architects
Master Plan Phases
1. Introduction:
The Identification phase of the master plan will be utilized to research all of
the existing and projected information and criteria relative to all current and
projected programs and activities of Brownsburg High School and research and
documentation of the existing quality and quantity of the facilities to support
same.
2. Evaluation:
The Evaluation phase of the master plan will be utilized to analyze all current
and future needs relative to the current and projected programs and activities
and the facility development to support same. This evaluation is often referred
to as the “brainstorming” phase of the master plan process, in which various
options and alternatives are analyzed to address future growth needs relative
to programs and activities and facility plans required to support same. Order
of magnitude cost estimates are coordinated for all options reviewed.
Master Plan Phases (Continued)
3. Recommendation:
The Recommendation phase of the master plan will be utilized to synthesize
the research and analysis coordinated in the Identification and Evaluation
phases, into the preferred alternatives(s) relative to the utilization of the
facilities to accommodate current and future programs and activities. The
Recommendation phase basically outlines the master plan vision.
4. Implementation:
The Implementation phase of the project will be utilized by Brownsburg
Community School Corporation to carefully consider the timing an
implementation of components included and noted in the Recommendation
Phase of the project. The Implementation Phase information will include
projected timeframes and projected costs for each phase as recommended
by the administration in consultation with the design team.
Community Outreach / Input Process
Workshop Notes
• Each workshop will begin with a presentation of the appropriate topic followed by stakeholder input
• Workshop Documentation Stakeholder Input BCSC Website
• Respectful communication with all stakeholders and team members
Community Outreach / Input Process
Master Plan Workshop No. 1 (Identification Phase)Review of the current and long term vision for high school programs and activities, and develop an understanding of stakeholder concerns
Tuesday, October 1, 20136:30 P.M.
Master Plan Workshop No. 2 (Identification Phase)Review and develop understanding for the history and existing conditions at the high school. The workshop will be followed by tours of the facility.
Wednesday, October 9, 20136:30 P.M.
Master Plan Workshop No. 3 (Evaluation Phase)Review the long term space requirements and the facilityneeds of the high school to ultimately establish the scope ofthe master plan.
Wednesday, October 30, 20136:30 P.M.
Community Outreach / Input Process (Continued)
Master Plan Workshop No. 4 (Evaluation Phase)Develop consensus on long term space and facility needs of the high school
Wednesday, November 13, 20136:30 P.M.
Master Plan Workshop No. 5 ( Evaluation Phase)Review previous consensus on long term space and facility needs of the high school. Begin review of concept site and building adjacency diagrams.
Monday, January 6, 20136:30 P.M.
Community Outreach / Input Process (Continued)
Master Plan Workshop No. 6 (Evaluation Phase)Review conceptual site plans, floor plans and rendering options as well as order of magnitude cost estimates.
Monday, February 3, 20136:30 P.M.
Master Plan Workshop No. 7 (Recommendation Phase)Develop consensus on master plan scope (size), quality (concept design) and cost.
Monday, March 3, 20136:30 P.M.
Master Plan Workshop No. 8 (Implementation Phase)Review and develop consensus on master plan implementation phases.
Monday, April 21, 20136:30 P.M.
1. Should we build a new high school?
2. Should we build a second high school?
1971: 875 1976: 1,091 1981: 1,294 1986: 1,305 1991: 1,125 1996: 1,300 2001: 1,408 2006: 2,082 2011: 2,176 2013: 2,214 2017: 2,530 (Based on current enrollment)
1971
1975
1975 1975
1987
1989 1991
1996
1997
1999
1999
2001
2003
20042005
2006
Graduation Rate Increase Diploma Types Advanced Placement (AP) Scores National Student Recognition
89.90%
92.10%
95.10%
96.20%
97.10%
2009 2010 2011 2012 *2013
BHS Graduation Rate
4440.7
47.5 46.4 45
63 65
54.858.6
50.9 52.4 54.2
1.2 0.6 1.6 1.2 1.40
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013* 2014* 2015*
% of Diploma Types Earned
AHD Core 40 Gen.
The state’s goal for students to show success in this areafor school is 25%. For the classes of 2012 & 2013 approx.60% of BHS graduates showed success in this area.
Scored a 3, 4, 5 on an AP Exam Earned at least 3 Dual Credits Pass approved Industry Certification Exam
148
196213
0
50
100
150
200
250
2008 - 2009 2009 - 2010 2011 - 2012
Graduates Taking AP Exam
73 75
140
020406080
100120140160
2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 *2013 - 2014
Enrollment at Area 31
22.60% 22.60% 22.30%
25.90%
28.60%
2009 2010 2011 2012 *2013
% of Graduates Scoring a 3, 4, or 5 on AP Exams
2012 AP Average Score: 2.77 2013 AP Average Score: 3.05
Since 2009, BHS has had 13 National Merit Scholars
AP Scholars (Score a 3, 4, or 5 on at least 3 different AP Exams)
School Year # of AP Scholars Average Score
2010 - 2011 58 3.38
2011 - 2012 82 3.61
2012 - 2013 111 3.80
Assistant Principal, Guidance Counselor, Academic Coach, and Administrative Assistant
Travel with their graduation cohort Goal of meeting with every family, every year Establish relationships with students through
academic and behavior support Track data on a daily basis Provide individualized avenues for student success
Better informed parents about the high school process –Collective decision making
Decrease in discipline due to increased relationships
Increase in Attendance Rate
Increase in Graduation Rate
Increase in AP scores
Increase in amount of Academic Honors Diplomas
Increase in enrollment at Area 31
Vision: Brownsburg Senior Academy Cadre graduates are skilled, self-directed, and analytical thinkers who are prepared to compete and collaborate in a technical, global society. The graduates are leaders in personal, community and workplace environments.
Innovative learning environment Technology-based education Project-oriented learning Career-focused education planning Student-leadership focus
“A facility designed for preparing students for future success”
As we continue to fulfill our mission to “provide, within a secure environment, an engaging, relevant educational program with academic opportunities for all students to pursue their maximum intellectual potential”, we are distinctly aware of the age of some of our school buildings. The heart of the Brownsburg High School building was constructed in 1971. While many improvements have happened in the years since, that original structure remains largely unchanged. Education has changed and our student environment should match that innovation.
“Heart of BHS” 1971 - Present Future “Heart of BHS” – meeting the needs of the 21st century leaner
• Old Cafeteria• Old Media Center• Auto Shop• Special Ed classrooms built for small groups• Lecture Hall• Outdated Science Labs• Outdated Production Labs• Narrow Hallways
• PLTW Wing (Engineering & Biomedical Sciences)• Re-organization of Special Education Rooms• Culinary Arts re-organization• Business department room structure• Lab for TV Broadcasting/Yearbook/Newspaper• Reorganization of Team offices• More space for students to travel safely and more
efficiently
Understanding Stakeholder Questions, Suggestions, and
Concerns
Master Plan Workshop No. 2
Existing Conditions
Wednesday, October 9, 20136:30 P.M.