+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bismillah Fix Hba1c3

Bismillah Fix Hba1c3

Date post: 17-Aug-2015
Category:
Upload: nsafifah
View: 225 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
DM
Popular Tags:
8
Research Article Outcome Analysis of Hemoglobin A1c, Weight, and Blood Pressure in a VA Diabetes Education Program Susan L. North, RD, MPH; Glen A. Palmer, PhD, ABN ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the effect of a specific diabetes education class (Basics) on hemoglobin A1c values, weight, and systolic blood pressure. Design: In this retrospective study, the researchers compared 2 groups of male veterans with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. One group received diabetes group education (n ¼ 175) over a 4-month period, and the other received standard diabetes management follow-up (n ¼ 184). Setting: Outpatient clinic setting in the Midwest. Interventions: Basics class compared with standard level of care. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and post-laboratory values for hemoglobin A1c, weight, and systolic blood pressure. Analysis: Multivariate analysis of covariance and follow-up univariate statistics for significant differences. Results: Findings revealed significant differences in hemoglobin A1c (P < .001) and weight (P < .001) in the treatment group compared with the control group. No significant difference was found in systolic blood pressure readings between the 2 groups. There was a significant difference in weight change between groups, with the treatment group demonstrating greater weight loss. Conclusions and Implication: There was an association between participation in the Basics diabetes education curriculum and reduction of hemoglobin A1c values. Some participants also had added benefit of significant weight loss. Key Words: diabetes, hemoglobin A1c, nutrition education, veterans, overweight, hypertension (J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47:28-35.) Accepted July 27, 2014. Published online September 27, 2014. INTRODUCTION According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the preva- lence of diabetes in the US is 25.8 million people or 8.3% of the general population. This includes 18.8 million diagnosed and 7 million un- diagnosed people. Type 2 diabetes accounts for 90% to 95% of all diag- nosed persons. 1 Within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, nearly 25% of veterans have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes is the leading cause of blindness, end-stage renal dis- ease, and amputation in the US and in the VA. The mortality rate among VA patients with type 2 diabetes averages approximately 5%/year compared with 2.6% of patients without dia- betes, and the majority of deaths and hospitalizations related to diabetes both inside and outside the VA are due to macrovascular complications such as heart attack and stroke. 2 Approximately three quarters of US veterans have a body mass index (BMI) > 25. The BMI is positively associated with vascular, diabetic, renal, and hepatic mortality rates. 3 These statistics are primary reasons why the VA's Diabetes Quality Enhancement Initiative asserts that approaches to preventing diabetes share many of the same characteris- tics as those to preventing and treat- ing obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Veterans Affairs research and imple- mentation programs focus not only on diabetes prevention and manage- ment, but more broadly on weight management, physical activity pro- motion, and cardiovascular disease risk prevention. 2 Nationwide, the VA has no uniform diabetes educa- tion curriculum for veterans with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes education programs are an important facet of diabetes manage- ment and care as evidenced by the numerous meta-analytic studies found in the literature. One systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis from Norway looked at 21 studies including 2,833 participants. Ran- domized controlled trials evaluating group-based diabetes self-management education for adult type 2 diabetes vs routine treatment were evaluated. The main conclusion of that review stated that group-based diabetes self- management education for persons with type 2 diabetes resulted in im- provements in clinical, lifestyle, and psychosocial outcomes. 4 A meta-analysis consisting of 18 studies examined the efcacy of St Cloud VA Health Care System, St Cloud, MN Address for correspondence: Susan L. North, RD, MPH, St Cloud VA Health Care System, 4801 Veterans Dr, Brainerd–CBOC, St Cloud, MN 56303; Phone: (218) 825-2616; Fax: (218) 855-1183; E-mail: [email protected] PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER INC. ON BEHALF OF THE SOCIETY FOR NUTRI- TION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.07.006 28 Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior Volume 47, Number 1, 2015
Transcript

Research ArticleOutcome Analysis of Hemoglobin A1c, Weight, and BloodPressure in a VA Diabetes Education ProgramSusan L. North, RD, MPH; Glen A. Palmer, PhD, ABNABSTRACTObjective: Todeterminetheeffectofaspecicdiabeteseducationclass(Basics)onhemoglobinA1cvalues, weight, and systolic blood pressure.Design: Inthisretrospectivestudy, theresearcherscompared2groupsofmaleveteranswitharecentdiagnosisoftype2diabetes. Onegroupreceiveddiabetesgroupeducation(n 175)overa4-monthperiod, and the other received standard diabetes management follow-up (n 184).Setting: Outpatient clinic setting in the Midwest.Interventions: Basics class compared with standard level of care.MainOutcomeMeasures: Pre-andpost-laboratoryvaluesforhemoglobinA1c,weight,andsystolicblood pressure.Analysis: Multivariate analysis of covariance and follow-up univariate statistics for signicant differences.Results: Findings revealed signicant differences in hemoglobin A1c (P 4months' follow-up. Theyalsonoted that HbA1c decreased morewith additional contact time betweenparticipantandeducator. Adecreaseof 1% was noted for every additional23.6hours of contact. One percentdrop in HbA1c is associated withimproved outcomes.7Ina meta-analysis of 153studiespublished between 1977 and 1994evaluatingtheeffectiveness of inter-ventions designed to improve patientcompliance with medical regimen,Roteretal8concludedthatnosingleintervention strategy appeared consis-tentlystrongerthananyother.How-ever, the authors noted that the morecomprehensivetheprogramwas, themoreeffectivetheoutcomewas, andthe most benecial interventionsincluded3comprehensiveelements:educational, behavioral, and affective.Offering groupeducationtopatientsmayprovetobemorecost-effective.9Duncanet al10reviewedcommercialand Medicare claims payer-deriveddatasetsandconcludedthatpatientswho participated in diabetes educationhad lower average costs thanthosewho didnot participate indiabeteseducation. In addition, diabetes educa-tionparticipants weremorelikelytofollow recommendations for care thansimilar patients who did not participatein diabetes education. The authorsconcludedthatqualityofcarecanbeimproved and costs reduced, specif-ically among men and people in disad-vantaged areas.TheBasicsprogramisusedattheVAhealthcare systemfromwhichthis retrospective chart review wasconducted. This curriculum originatesfromoneof the rst outpatient dia-beteseducationcenters. Clinical andeducational guidance was providedbyaregistereddietitian, aregisterednurse, andaphysician. Thephiloso-phy at the heart of the program is therecognitionthatthepatientisatthecenterofthisteamandcanlearntoself-manage diabetes. Four educationalmodels are applied to the curriculum:adult learning theory,11the trans-theoretical model (stages of change),12the healthbelief model,13and the pub-lichealthnursingmodel.14Thepro-grammeets the National StandardsforDiabetesSelfManagementEduca-tion Programs.15A detailed descriptionand philosophy of the program can befound in Diabetes Basics: education,innovation, revolution.16The targetaudienceforthecurriculumisnewlydiagnosed persons with type 2 diabeteswhohave receivedlittle or noself-management education. The objec-tivesoftheprogramarethreefold:toimprove glycemic control, to enhanceknowledge of diabetes management,and, for patients, to implement at least1 positive behavior change.In the mid 1990s, a team from theInternational Diabetes Center in Min-neapolis, MN, conducteda randomizedcontrolledtrial to compare diabetesgroup education using the Basics cur-riculum(n 87)withindividual in-struction(n 83). Subjects receivededucation in 4 sequential sessionsover 6 months. Outcomes reviewedincluded change in knowledge,self-management behaviors, weight,BMI, HbA1c, health-related qualityoflife, patient attitudes, and medicationregimen. Results showedsimilar im-provement inknowledge, BMI, andhealth-related quality of life. Hemoglo-bin A1c decreased in both groupsalthough the decrease was marginallygreaterin groupeducationthanindi-vidual instruction. This study demon-strated that group education andindividual education are equally effec-tive at providing the outcome ofimproved glycemic control.17In this particular VA outpatientclinic setting, veterans are typicallyreferred to classes by a diabetes educa-tionconsultplacedbytheirprimarycareprovider. TheBasicsprogramispresented by a registered dietitianandaregisterednursein3sessions.Sessions 1 and 2 are planned forapproximately 2 weeks apart to allowpatientstodeneandfocustheiref-forts for behavior change. Session3is held3months after session2toreneandpracticeeffortsfurtherto-wardlong-termbehavior change inthose areas the patient has identied.Figure 1 shows the content of each in-dividual session. The three sessionlengths are 2.5, 2, and 1.5 hours.Before each session, vital signs aretaken and recorded in the medical re-cord. The dietitianweighs eachpa-tient ona calibratedscale. Patientsareweighedfullyclothed.Thenursetakes a bloodpressure reading beforeclass. An elevated blood pressure(>140/90) is rechecked before theend of the session.Althoughtheprimarygoal oftheBasics programis glycemic controlfor the patient, management ofweight andbloodpressuremayalsoprovide signicant health benets.Atracking and goal setting toolcalledMySuccess Plan is usedintheBasicscurriculumforthebenetof instructors and patients. With thistool, instructors guide patients tofocus on1 area of change from7deemed critical by the American Asso-ciation of Diabetes Educators. These 7areas include nutrition, physical activ-ity, medication regimens, problemsolving, stress management, bloodglucose testing, andother forms ofrisk reduction such as smoking cessa-tion. Patientsmaybenetbysettingmore measurable andspecic goalsfor behavior change, thus avoidingfrustration and confusion. Successplans helppatients prioritizeeffortsand dene expectations.Family and peer support are recog-nized as important to a patient'sself-management efforts. Therefore,veterans are encouraged to bring afamilymember suchas aspouse toparticipate in all sessions. Veteransalsomay learnfromeachother bysharing personal struggles and suc-cesses. A regularly occurring follow-upgroup is offered to veterans who havecompleted the 3 sessions. Follow-up isencouragedquarterly, biannually, orannually per the veteran's choice.Overall, basedontheliteraturere-view, diabetes groupeducationmayresult in modest improvement inHbA1c, weight, blood pressure, andother indicators of health. The primaryobjective of this retrospective chartJournal of Nutrition Education and BehaviorVolume 47, Number 1, 2015 North and Palmer 29reviewwas todetermine the associationof diabetes education classes using theBasicscurriculumwithbloodglucosemanagement, weight, and blood pres-sure outcomes. It was hypothesizedthat individuals who received diabeteseducation using the Basics curriculumwouldhaveimprovedoutcomesoverindividuals who did not participate inthese classes.METHODSThis study was a retrospective, obser-vational chart review of medicalrecords froma large VA medical centerintheMidwest that uses theBasicsprogram. The study was approvedby the VA-afliated institutionalreviewboardandresearchanddev-elopmentcommittee. Becauseoftheretrospective nature of the study, theresearchers obtained a waiver ofinformedconsent andHealthInsur-ance Portability and AccountabilityAct authorizationfromthe afliateinstitutional review board.Patient SampleThis was a retrospective analysis ofmedical records of veterans whoreceived care from a large VA medicalcenter inthe Midwest. Medical re-cords wereincludedinthis studyifthe medical record showed a diagnosisof type 2 diabetes within the previous2years.Ofthe1,626patientrecordsscreened, 1,263 were initiallyexcluded in the study. Four additionalpatientrecordswereexcludedowingtoextremeoutliers onpretreatmentscores. Themajorityof screenedpa-tient records that were excludedfromthis study did not meet thecriteriaforarecentdiagnosisoftype2 diabetes or did not have laboratoryvalues that fell within establishedtime parameters. Figure 2 shows aowchart of the selection process.A total of 359 medical records(Basics class 175 and controlgroup 184) wereacceptedfor thisstudy. The time period for this chart re-view is between the beginning ofJanuary, 2008andtheendof June,2011. Treatment group candidateswere identied froma spreadsheetkept internally by the medical center'snutrition clinic, which tracks pre- andpost-class values for HbA1c, weight,andsystolic bloodpressure andhasbeenusedforcasemanagementpur-poses within the facility. Each patientinthetreatmentgroupcompletedall3 sessions of the Basics diabetes educa-tionprogram.Thecontrolgroupwasselectedfromalist of veterans whoare patients of the medical center,whohavea diagnosis of type2diabetes,and had not beenseen ina VAdiabeteseducation clinic.The mean age of individuals in theBasics class was 65.2 years (SD, 8.87);the meanage of the control groupwas 66.8 (SD, 9.67). Most of thesubjects were Caucasian(78.9%forthe treatment group vs 73.4% for thecontrol group). There were no signi-cant differences between groups basedon age (P .11) or ethnicity (P .33).Chart ReviewFor the treatment group, the re-searchers collected data includingweight and systolic blood pressurereadingsthatareroutinelytakenandrecordedbeforesessions1and3andwere present in the medical record. If2 systolic blood pressure readingswere present in the medical record forthe same class day, the lower of the 2was taken. For thetreatment group,HbA1c values were taken fromtheclosest availablereadingbeforetreat-ment (nogreater than90days) andthe earliest reading posttreatment (nogreater than 90 days). Total length oftime between pre- and posttreat-mentwasnomorethan10months.This period was determined to beappropriate because the accuracy ofan HbA1c value is approximately6090 days. A medical record wasincludedinthestudyif theveteranhadbeengivenadiagnosisoftype2diabeteswithintheprevious2years.The researchers collected data forthe control groupincluding HbA1c,weight, and systolic blood pressurefound in the medical record at baselineandfollow-upforthesamelengthoftime as the treatment group. Data pre-sent in the medical records wereassumed to have been collectedfollowing standard VA procedure.Figure1. Educational topicspresentedintheBasicsprogrambysession.30 North and Palmer Journal of Nutrition Education and BehaviorVolume 47, Number 1, 2015Statistical AnalysisAminimumsamplesizeof 211wasdetermined as necessary to provideforapowerof0.80andeffectsizeof0.25. Alpha for this calculationwassetat P


Recommended