+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Blair Marsh Veg Management Considerations 061215

Blair Marsh Veg Management Considerations 061215

Date post: 15-Sep-2015
Category:
Upload: hrnerr
View: 23 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Betsy Blair's presentation from the 4th Piermont Fact Finding Meeting
Popular Tags:
14
1 Piermont Marsh Management Considerations
Transcript
  • 1Piermont Marsh Management Considerations

  • 2Long-term marsh management goals Sustain native marsh communities Promote marsh resiliency to sea level

    riseMaintain or enhance storm protection for

    Village Increase scientific knowledge and public

    understanding of marsh

  • 3Key take-home messages Only envision small-scale pilot projects followed by monitoring &

    assessment, adaptation, and where appropriate, modest scale-ups

    Not thinking about any activity that would at any time involve all or large parts of the marsh

    Minimal work at north end, if any would not be visible from Village

    Now considering many options beyond just Phragmites management

  • 4Planning approach Convene fact-finding meetings to explore larger topics Continue to explore the context for management: current

    conditions, trends, threats, and opportunities Hone in on desired outcomes more specifically Evaluate many management options to achieve these

    outcomes Continue to talk with the community and regional experts

  • 5Context Variable salinity, brackish to fresh Nutrient enrichment in Tappan Zee Sea level rise rate is inch/year Piermont is a globally rare marsh,

    unique on Hudson River

  • 6Marsh erosion at east edge

  • 7Lots of storm debris & wrack

  • 8Diminishing salt meadows

  • 9Conservation targets what do we mean?- Habitats (e.g., salt meadows)- Species (e.g., terrapins or rare plants) - Ecosystem services (e.g. wave attenuation to

    buffer Village)

  • 10

    Conservation targets (draft, partial list)- Salt meadows & shallow pools persist - Rare plants persist - Diamond-back terrapin use of marsh &

    environs enhanced?- Wave energy on marsh edge buffered?- All of above need more detail on what,

    how much, & when

  • 11

    Wide range of management options to achieve conservation targets Restore marsh vegetation Expand marsh to east and south Add constructed habitats to support wildlife and serve as

    protective barriers, potentially including oysters where conditions permit

  • 12

    Potential Constraints Long-term funding, agency resources, public support Short-term all of above, plus consistency with bridge

    permit requirements Regulatory regulations may preclude certain actions, such

    as marsh creation where none previously existed Feasibility conditions may not be right, for instance oyster

    growth is limited by low salinity

  • 13

    Opportunities High public interest in marshMany partnership opportunities for stewardship & educationGrowing research infrastructure in place Source of funding in place to launch long-term marsh

    restorationWe are much more aware of climate impacts, and have a

    chance to take action to benefit both our natural and human communities

  • 14

    Last thoughtsWe have by no means settled on where or how we might

    seek to control Phragmites at Piermont Marsh. Tonight is intended to provide an overview of marsh

    vegetation management approaches, and to look at two local examples of Phragmites control.

    Piermont Marsh Management ConsiderationsLong-term marsh management goalsKey take-home messagesPlanning approach Context Marsh erosion at east edgeLots of storm debris & wrackDiminishing salt meadowsConservation targets what do we mean?Conservation targets (draft, partial list)Wide range of management options to achieve conservation targetsPotential Constraints OpportunitiesLast thoughts


Recommended