of 45
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
1/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2242 | Page
1Dr. K. N. Prasanna Kumar,
2Prof. B. S. Kiranagi,
3Prof. C. S. Bagewadi
.
ABSTRACT: We provide a series of Models for the problems that arise in Yang Mills Theory. No claim is made that the
problem is solved. We do factorize the Yang Mills Theory and give a Model for the values of LHS and RHS of the yang Mills
theory. We hope these forms the stepping stone for further factorizations and solutions to the subatomic denominations at
Plancks scale. Work also throws light on some important factors like mass acquisition by symmetry breaking, relationbetween strong interaction and weak interaction, Lagrangian Invariance despite transformations, Gauge field,
Noncommutative symmetry group of Gauge Theory and Yang Mills Theory itself..
We take in to consideration the following parameters, processes and concepts:
(1) Acquisition of mass(2) Symmetry Breaking(3) Strong interaction(4) Unified Electroweak interaction(5)
Continuous group of local transformations(6) Lagrangian Variance
(7) Group generator in Gauge Theory(8) Vector field or Gauge field(9) Non commutative symmetry group in Gauge Theory(10)Yang Mills Theory (We repeat the same Banks example. Individual debits and Credits are conservative so
also the holistic one. Generalized theories are applied to various systems which are parameterized. And we
live in measurement world. Classification is done on the parameters of various systems to which the Theory
is applied. ).
(11)First Term of the Lagrangian of the Yang Mills Theory(LHS)
(12)RHS of the Yang Mills Theory
SYMMETRY BREAKING AND ACQUISITION OF MASS:
MODULE NUMBERED ONENOTATION: : CATEGORY ONE OF SYMMETRY BREAKING : CATEGORY TWO OF SYMMETRY BREAKING
: CATEGORY THREE OF SYMMETRY BREAKING
: CATEGORY ONE OF ACQUISITION OF MASS
: CATEGORY TWO OF ACQUISITION OF MASS :CATEGORY THREE OF ACQUISITION OF MASSUNIFIED ELECTROWEAK INTERACTION AND STRONG INTERACTION:
MODULE NUMBERED TWO:
============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OF UNIFIED ELECTROWEAK INTERACTION : CATEGORY TWO OFUNIFIED ELECTROWEAK INTERACTION : CATEGORY THREE OFUNIFIED ELECTROWEAK IONTERACTION :CATEGORY ONE OF STRONG INTERACTION : CATEGORY TWO OF STRONG INTERACTION
: CATEGORY THREE OF STRONG INTERACTION
LAGRANGIAN INVARIANCE AND CONTINOUS GROUP OF LOCAL TRANSFORMATIONS:MODULE NUMBERED THREE:
============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OF CONTINUOUS GROUP OF LOCAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Some Contributions to Yang Mills Theory Fortification
Dissipation Models
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
2/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2243 | Page
:CATEGORY TWO OFCONTINUOUS GROUP OF LOCAL TRANSFORMATIONS : CATEGORY THREE OF CONTINUOUS GROUP OF LOCAL TRANSFORMATION : CATEGORY ONE OF LAGRANGIAN INVARIANCE :CATEGORY TWO OF LAGRANGIAN INVARIANCE : CATEGORY THREE OF LAGRANGIAN INVARIANCEGROUP GENERATOR OF GAUGE THEORY AND VECTOR FIELD(GAUGE FIELD):: MODULE NUMBERED FOUR:
============================================================================
: CATEGORY ONE OF GROUP GENERATOR OF GAUGE THEORY : CATEGORY TWO OF GROUP GENERATOR OF GAUGE THEORY : CATEGORY THREE OF GROUP GENERATOR OF GAUGE THEORY :CATEGORY ONE OF VECTOR FIELD NAMELY GAUGE FIELD :CATEGORY TWO OF GAUGE FIELD : CATEGORY THREE OFGAUGE FIELDYANG MILLS THEORYAND NON COMMUTATIVE SYMMETRY GROUP IN GAUGE THEORY:
MODULE NUMBERED FIVE:
=============================================================================
: CATEGORY ONE OF NON COMMUTATIVE SYMMETRY GROUP OF GAUGE THEORY : CATEGORY TWO OF NON COMMUTATIVE SYMMETRY GROUP OPF GAUGE THEORY :CATEGORY THREE OFNON COMMUTATIVE SYMMETRY GROUP OF GAUGE THEORY : CATEGORY ONE OFYANG MILLS THEORY (Theory is applied to various subatomic particle systems andthe classification is done based on the parametricization of these systems. There is not a single system known which is
not characterized by some properties) :CATEGORY TWO OF YANG MILLS THEORY :CATEGORY THREE OF YANG MILLS THEORYLHS OF THE YANG MILLS THEORY AND RHS OF THE YANG MILLS THEORY.TAKEN TO THE OTHER
SIDE THE LHS WOULD DISSIPATE THE RHS WITH OR WITHOUT TIME LAG :
MODULE NUMBERED SIX:
============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OF LHS OF YANG MILLS THEORY : CATEGORY TWO OF LHS OF YANG MILLS THEORY : CATEGORY THREE OF LHS OF YANG MILLS THEORY : CATEGORY ONE OF RHS OF YANG MILLS THEORY : CATEGORY TWO OF RHS OF YANG MILLS THEORY : CATEGORY THREE OF RHS OF YANG MILLS THEORY (Theory applied to various characterized systemsand the systemic characterizations form the basis for the formulation of the classification).
===============================================================================
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , are Accentuation coefficients , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , are Dissipation coefficients.
SYMMETRY BREAKING AND ACQUISITION OF MASS:
MODULE NUMBERED ONE
The differential system of this model is now (Module Numbered one).113 = 13114 13 1 + 13 114 , 13 .214 = 14113 14 1 + 14 114 , 14 .3
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
3/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2244 | Page
15 = 15114 15 1 + 15 114 , 15 .413 = 13114 13 1 13 1, 13 .514 = 14113 14 1 14 1, 14 .615
=
15
1
14
15
1
15
1
,
15 .7
+13
1
14 , = First augmentation factor .813 1, = First detritions factor.UNIFIED ELECTROWEAK INTERACTION AND STRONG INTERACTION:MODULE NUMBERED TWO
The differential system of this model is now ( Module numbered two).916 = 16217 16 2 + 16 217 , 16 .1017 = 17216 17 2 + 17 217 , 17.1118 = 18217 18 2 + 18 217 , 18.1216 = 16217 16 2 16 219, 16.1317
=
17
2
16
17
2
17
2
19
,
17 .14
18 = 18217 18 2 18 219, 18 .15+16 217 , = First augmentation factor .1616 219, = First detritions factor .17LAGRANGIAN INVARIANCE AND CONTINOUS GROUP OF LOCAL TRANSFORMATIONS:
MODULE NUMBERED THREE
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered three).1820 = 20321 20 3 + 20 321 , 20 .1921 = 21320 21 3 + 21 321 , 21 .2022
=
22
3
21
22
3 +
22
3
21 ,
22 .21
20
= 203
21 20
3
20
3
23 , 20 .2221 = 21320 21 3 21 323 , 21 .2322 = 22321 22 3 22 323 , 22 .24+20 321 , = First augmentation factor.20 323 , = First detritions factor .25
GROUP GENERATOR OF GAUGE THEORY AND VECTOR FIELD(GAUGE FIELD):: MODULE NUMBERED FOUR:
============================================================================The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Four).2624
=
24
4
25
24
4 +
24
4
25 ,
24 .27
25
= 25424 25 4
+ 25 4
25 , 25 .2826 = 26425 26 4 + 26 425 , 26 .2924 = 24425 24 4 24 427, 24 .3025 = 25424 25 4 25 427, 25 .3126 = 26425 26 4 26 427, 26 .32+24 425 , = First augmentation factor.3324 427, = First detritions factor .34
YANG MILLS THEORYAND NON COMMUTATIVE SYMMETRY GROUP IN GAUGE THEORY:
MODULE NUMBERED FIVE
The differential system of this model is now (Module number five).3528 = 28529 28 5 + 28 529 , 28 .3629 = 29528 29 5 + 29 529 , 29 .37
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
4/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2245 | Page
30 = 30529 30 5 + 30 529 , 30 .3828 = 28529 28 5 28 531, 28 .3929 = 29528 29 5 29 531, 29 .4030 = 30529 30 5 30 531, 30 .41+
28
5
29 ,
= First augmentation factor .42
28 531, = First detritions factor .43LHS OF THE YANG MILLS THEORY AND RHS OF THE YANG MILLS THEORY.TAKEN TO THE OTHERSIDE THE LHS WOULD DISSIPATE THE RHS WITH OR WITHOUT TIME LAG :
MODULE NUMBERED SIX
:
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Six).444532 = 32633 32 6 + 32 633 , 32 .4633 = 33632 33 6 + 33 633 , 33 .4734
=
34
6
33
34
6 +
34
6
33 ,
34 .48
32
= 326
33 32
6
32
6
35, 32 .4933 = 33632 33 6 33 635, 33 .5034 = 34633 34 6 34 635, 34 .51+32 633 , = First augmentation factor.5232 635, = First detritions factor .53HOLISTIC CONCATENATE SYTEMAL EQUATIONS HENCEFORTH REFERRED TO AS GLOBALEQUATIONS
We take in to consideration the following parameters, processes and concepts:
(1) Acquisition of mass(2) Symmetry Breaking(3) Strong interaction(4) Unified Electroweak interaction(5) Continuous group of local transformations(6) Lagrangian Variance(7) Group generator in Gauge Theory(8) Vector field or Gauge field(9) Non commutative symmetry group in Gauge Theory(10)Yang Mills Theory (We repeat the same Banks example. Individual debits and Credits are conservative so
also the holistic one. Generalized theories are applied to various systems which are parameterized. And we
live in measurement world. Classification is done on the parameters of various systems to which the Theory
is applied. ).(11)First Term of the Lagrangian of the Yang Mills Theory(LHS)
(12)RHS of the Yang Mills Theory
54
13 = 13114 13 1 +13 114 , +16 2,2,17 , +20 3,3,21 , +24 4,4,4,4,25 , +28 5,5,5,5,29, +32 6,6,6,6,33 , 13 .55
14
=
14
1
13
14 1 +14 114 , +17 2,2,17 , +21 3,3,21 , +25
4,4,4,4,
25 , +29
5,5,5,5,
29, +33
6,6,6,6,
33 , 14 .56
15 = 15114 15 1 +15 114 , +18 2,2,17 , +22 3,3,21 , +26 4,4,4,4,25 , +30 5,5,5,5,29, +34 6,6,6,6,33 , 15 .57
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
5/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2246 | Page
Where 13 114 , , 14 114 , , 15 114 , are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3+16 2,2,17 , , +17 2,2,17 , , +18 2,2,17 , are second augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and
3
+20 3,3,21 , , +21 3,3,21 , , +22 3,3,21 , are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3+24
4,4,4,4,
25 , , +25
4,4,4,4,
25 , , +26
4,4,4,4,
25 , are fourth augmentation coefficient for category 1,2 and 3+28 5,5,5,5,29 , , +29 5,5,5,5,29, , +30 5,5,5,5,29 , are fifth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2and 3
+32 6,6,6,6,33 , , +33 6,6,6,6,33 , , +34 6,6,6,6,33 , are sixth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2and 3.58 59
.60
13 = 13114 13 1 13 1, 16 2,2,19, 20 3,3,23 , 24 4,4,4,4,27 , 28 5,5,5,5,31 , 32 6,6,6,6,35 , 13.61
14 = 14113 14
1
14
1
,
17
2,2,
19,
21
3,3,
23 ,
25 4,4,4,4,27 , 29 5,5,5,5,31 , 33 6,6,6,6,35, 14 .6215 = 15114 15 1 15 1, 18 2,2,19, 22 3,3,23 , 26 4,4,4,4,27 , 30 5,5,5,5,31 , 34 6,6,6,6,35, 15 .63Where 13 1, , 14 1, , 15 1, are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 316 2,2,19, , 17 2,2,19, , 18 2,2,19, are second detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 320 3,3,23 , , 21 3,3,23 , , 22 3,3,23 , are third detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
24
4,4,4,4,
27 ,
,
25
4,4,4,4,
27 ,
,
26
4,4,4,4,
27 ,
are fourth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2
and 328 5,5,5,5,31 , , 29 5,5,5,5,31 , , 30 5,5,5,5,31 , are fifth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2and 332 6,6,6,6,35 , , 33 6,6,6,6,35, , 34 6,6,6,6,35 , are sixth detritions coefficients for category 1, 2and 3 .64.65
16 = 16217 16 2 +16 217 , +13 1,1,14 , +20 3,3,321 , +24 4,4,4,4,425 , +28 5,5,5,5,529, +32 6,6,6,6,633 , 16 .66
17 = 17216 17 2 +17 217 , +14 1,1,14 , +21 3,3,321 , +
25
4,4,4,4,4
25 ,
+
29
5,5,5,5,5
29,
+
33
6,6,6,6,6
33 ,
17 .67
18 = 18217 18 2 +18 217 , +15 1,1,
14 , +22 3,3,321 , +26 4,4,4,4,425 , +30 5,5,5,5,529, +34 6,6,6,6,633 , 18 .68Where +16 217 , , +17 217 , , +18 217 , are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3+13 1,1,14 , , +14 1,1,14 , , +15 1,1,14 , are second augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3+20 3,3,321 , , +21 3,3,321 , , +22 3,3,321 , are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and3
+24 4,4,4,4,425 , , +25 4,4,4,4,425 , , +26 4,4,4,4,425 , are fourth augmentation coefficient for category1, 2 and 3
+
28
5,5,5,5,5
29 ,
, +
29
5,5,5,5,5
29,
, +
30
5,5,5,5,5
29 ,
are fifth augmentation coefficient for category
1, 2 and 3
+32 6,6,6,6,633 , , +33 6,6,6,6,633 , , +34 6,6,6,6,633 , are sixth augmentation coefficient for category1, 2 and 3 .69 70.71
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
6/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2247 | Page
16 = 16217 16 2 16 219, 13 1,1,, 20 3,3,3,23 , 24 4,4,4,4,427 , 28 5,5,5,5,531 , 32 6,6,6,6,635 , 16 .7217 = 17216 17 2 17 219, 14 1,1,, 21 3,3,3,23 ,
25
4,4,4,4,4
27 ,
29
5,5,5,5,5
31 ,
33
6,6,6,6,6
35 ,
17 .73
18 = 18217 18 2 18 219, 15 1,1,, 22 3,3,3,23 , 26 4,4,4,4,427 , 30 5,5,5,5,531 , 34 6,6,6,6,635 , 18 .74where b16 2G19, t , b17 2G19, t , b18 2G19, t are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 313 1,1,, , 14 1,1,, , 15 1,1,, are second detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 320 3,3,3,23 , , 21 3,3,3,23 , , 22 3,3,3,23 , are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 324 4,4,4,4,427 , , 25 4,4,4,4,427 , , 26 4,4,4,4,427 , are fourth detritions coefficients for category 1,2and 3
28
5,5,5,5,5
31 ,
,
29
5,5,5,5,5
31 ,
,
30
5,5,5,5,5
31 ,
are fifth detritions coefficients for category 1,2
and 332 6,6,6,6,635 , , 33 6,6,6,6,635 , , 34 6,6,6,6,635 , are sixth detritions coefficients for category 1,2and 3.75
20 = 20321 20 3 +20 321 , +16 2,2,217 , +13 1,1,1,14 , +24 4,4,4,4,4,425 , +28 5,5,5,5,5,529, +32 6,6,6,6,6,633 , 20 .7621 = 21320 21 3 +21 321 , +17 2,2,217 , +14 1,1,1,14 ,
+25 4,4,4,4,4,425 , +29 5,5,5,5,5,529 , +33 6,6,6,6,6,633 , 21 .7722 = 22321
22
3
+
22
3
21 ,
+
18
2,2,2
17 ,
+
15
1,1,1,
14 ,
+26 4,4,4,4,4,425 , +30 5,5,5,5,5,529 , +34 6,6,6,6,6,633 , 22 .78+20 321 , , +21 321 , , +22 321 , are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3+16 2,2,217 , , +17 2,2,217 , , +18 2,2,217 , are second augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2and 3
+13 1,1,1,14 , , +14 1,1,1,14 , , +15 1,1,1,14 , are third augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2and 3
+24 4,4,4,4,4,425 , , +25 4,4,4,4,4,425 , , +26 4,4,4,4,4,425 , are fourth augmentation coefficients forcategory 1, 2 and 3
+28 5,5,5,5,5,529 , , +29 5,5,5,5,5,529 , , +30 5,5,5,5,5,529, are fifth augmentation coefficients forcategory 1, 2 and 3+32 6,6,6,6,6,633 , , +33 6,6,6,6,6,633 , , +34 6,6,6,6,6,633 , are sixth augmentation coefficients for
category 1, 2 and 3 .79 80.81
20 = 20321 20 3 20 323 , 16 2,2,219, 13 1,1,1,, 24 4,4,4,4,4,427 , 28 5,5,5,5,5,531 , 32 6,6,6,6,6,635, 20 .8221 = 21320 21 3 21 323 , 17 2,2,219, 14 1,1,1,,
25
4,4,4,4,4,4
27 ,
29
5,5,5,5,5,5
31 ,
33
6,6,6,6,6,6
35,
21 .83
22 = 22321 22 3 22 323 , 18 2,2,219, 15 1,1,1,, 26 4,4,4,4,4,427 , 30 5,5,5,5,5,531 , 34 6,6,6,6,6,635, 22 .84
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
7/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2248 | Page
20 323 , , 21 323 , , 22 323 , are first detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and 316 2,2,219, , 17 2,2,219, , 18 2,2,219, are second detritions coefficients for category 1, 2 and313 1,1,1,, , 14 1,1,1,, , 15 1,1,1,, are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 324
4,4,4,4,4,4
27 , , 25
4,4,4,4,4,4
27 , , 26
4,4,4,4,4,4
27 , are fourth detritions coefficients forcategory 1, 2 and 328 5,5,5,5,5,531 , , 29 5,5,5,5,5,531 , , 30 5,5,5,5,5,531 , are fifth detritions coefficients forcategory 1, 2 and 332 6,6,6,6,6,635 , , 33 6,6,6,6,6,635, , 34 6,6,6,6,6,635 , are sixth detritions coefficients for category1, 2 and 3 .85.86
24 = 24425 24 4 +24 425 , +28 5,5,29 , +32 6,6,33 , +13 1,1,1,114 , +16 2,2,2,217 , +20 3,3,3,321 , 24 .87
25
= 254
24 25
4
+
25
4
25 ,
+
29
5,5,
29 ,
+
33
6,6
33 ,
+14 1,1,1,114 , +17 2,2,2,217 , +21 3,3,3,321 , 25 .8826 = 26425 26 4 +26 425 , +30 5,5,29, +34 6,6,33 , +15 1,1,1,114 , +18 2,2,2,217 , +22 3,3,3,321 , 26 .89
24 425 , , 25 425 , , 26 425 , 1, 2 3+28 5,5,29, , +29 5,5,29, , +30 5,5,29 , 1, 2 3+32 6,6,33 , , +33 6,6,33 , , +34 6,6,33 , 1, 2 3+
13
1,1,1,1
14 ,
, +
14
1,1,1,1
14 ,
, +
15
1,1,1,1
14 ,
are fourth augmentation coefficients for category 1,
2,and 3
+16 2,2,2,217 , , +17 2,2,2,217 , , +18 2,2,2,217 , are fifth augmentation coefficients for category 1,2,and 3
+20 3,3,3,321 , , +21 3,3,3,321 , , +22 3,3,3,321 , are sixth augmentation coefficients for category 1,2,and 3 .90 91.92
24 = 24425 24 4 24 427 , 28 5,5,31 , 32 6,6,35 , 13 1,1,1,1, 16 2,2,2,219, 20 3,3,3,323 , 24 .9325
=
25
4
24
25 4 25 427 , 29 5,5,31 , 33 6,6,35 , 14
1,1,1,1
, 17
2,2,2,2
19, 21
3,3,3,3
23 , 25 .94
26 = 26425 26 4 26 427 , 30 5,5,31 , 34 6,6,35 , 15 1,1,1,1, 18 2,2,2,219, 22 3,3,3,323 , 26 .95 24 427 , , 25 427 , , 26 427 , 1, 2 328 5,5,31 , , 29 5,5,31 , , 30 5,5,31 , 1, 2 332 6,6,35 , , 33 6,6,35 , , 34 6,6,35 , 1, 2 313 1,1,1,1, , 14 1,1,1,1, , 15 1,1,1,1,
1, 2
3
16
2,2,2,2
19, , 17
2,2,2,2
19, , 18
2,2,2,2
19, 1, 2 3 20 3,3,3,323 , , 21 3,3,3,323 , , 22 3,3,3,323 , 1, 2 3 .96, 9798
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
8/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2249 | Page
28 = 28529 28 5 +28 529, +24 4,4,25 , +32 6,6,633 , +13 1,1,1,1,114 , +16 2,2,2,2,217 , +20 3,3,3,3,321 , 28 .99
29 = 29528 29 5 +29 529, +25 4,4,25 , +33 6,6,633 , +
14
1,1,1,1,1
14 ,
+
17
2,2,2,2,2
17 ,
+
21
3,3,3,3,3
21 ,
29 .100
30 = 30529 30 5 +30 529, +26 4,4,25 , +34 6,6,633 , +15 1,1,1,1,114 , +18 2,2,2,2,217 , +22 3,3,3,3,321 , 30 .101 +28 529, , +29 529, , +30 529 , 1, 2 3 +24 4,4,25 , , +25 4,4,25 , , +26 4,4,25 , 1, 2 +32 6,6,633 , , +33 6,6,633 , , +34 6,6,633 , 1, 2 3+13 1,1,1,1,114 , , +14 1,1,1,1,114 , , +15 1,1,1,1,114 , are fourth augmentation coefficients for category1,2, and 3
+
16
2,2,2,2,2
17 ,
, +
17
2,2,2,2,2
17 ,
, +
18
2,2,2,2,2
17 ,
are fifth augmentation coefficients for category
1,2,and 3
+20 3,3,3,3,321 , , +21 3,3,3,3,321 , , +22 3,3,3,3,321 , are sixth augmentation coefficients for category1,2, 3 .102.103
28 = 28529 28 5 28 531 , 24 4,4,27 , 32 6,6,635 , 13 1,1,1,1,1, 16 2,2,2,2,219, 20 3,3,3,3,323 , 28 .10429 = 29528 29 5 29 531 , 25 4,4,27 , 33 6,6,635, 14 1,1,1,1,1, 17 2,2,2,2,219, 21 3,3,3,3,323 , 29 .10530 = 30529
30
5
30
5
31 ,
26
4,4,
27 ,
34
6,6,6
35 ,
15 1,1,1,1,1,, 18 2,2,2,2,219, 22 3,3,3,3,323 , 30 .106 28 531 , , 29 531 , , 30 531 , 1, 2 324 4,4,27 , , 25 4,4,27 , , 26 4,4,27 , 1,2 332 6,6,635, , 33 6,6,635, , 34 6,6,635, 1,2 313 1,1,1,1,1, , 14 1,1,1,1,1, , 15 1,1,1,1,1,, are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and3
16
2,2,2,2,2
19,
,
17
2,2,2,2,2
19,
,
18
2,2,2,2,2
19,
are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1,2,
and 3 20 3,3,3,3,323 , , 21 3,3,3,3,323 , , 22 3,3,3,3,323 , are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1,2,and 3.107.108
32 = 32633 32 6 +32 633 , +28 5,5,529 , +24 4,4,4,25 , +13 1,1,1,1,1,114 , +16 2,2,2,2,2,217 , +20 3,3,3,3,3,321 , 32 .109
33 = 33632 33 6 +33 633 , +29 5,5,529 , +25 4,4,4,25 , +14 1,1,1,1,1,114 , +17 2,2,2,2,2,217 , +21 3,3,3,3,3,321 , 33 .110
34
=
34
6
33
34
6 +
34
6
33 ,
+
30
5,5,5
29,
+
26
4,4,4,
25 ,
+15 1,1,1,1,1,114 , +18 2,2,2,2,2,217 , +22 3,3,3,3,3,321 , 34 .111
+32 633 , , +33 633 , , +34 633 , 1, 2 3+28 5,5,529 , , +29 5,5,529 , , +30 5,5,529, 1, 2 3
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
9/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2250 | Page
+24 4,4,4,25 , , +25 4,4,4,25 , , +26 4,4,4,25 , 1, 2 +13 1,1,1,1,1,114 , , +14 1,1,1,1,1,114 , , +15 1,1,1,1,1,114 , - are fourth augmentation coefficients+16 2,2,2,2,2,217 , , +17 2,2,2,2,2,217 , , +18 2,2,2,2,2,217 , - fifth augmentation coefficients+
20
3,3,3,3,3,3
21 ,
, +
21
3,3,3,3,3,3
21 ,
, +
22
3,3,3,3,3,3
21 ,
sixth augmentation coefficients .112
.11332 = 32633 32 6 32 635 , 28 5,5,531 , 24 4,4,4,27 , 13 1,1,1,1,1,1, 16 2,2,2,2,2,219, 20 3,3,3,3,3,323 , 32 .11433 = 33632 33 6 33 635 , 29 5,5,531 , 25 4,4,4,27 , 14 1,1,1,1,1,1, 17 2,2,2,2,2,219, 21 3,3,3,3,3,323 , 33 .11534 = 34633 34 6 34 635 , 30 5,5,531 , 26 4,4,4,27 , 15 1,1,1,1,1,1, 18 2,2,2,2,2,219, 22 3,3,3,3,3,323 , 34 .116
32
6
35 ,
,
33
6
35 ,
,
34
6
35,
1, 2
3
28 5,5,531 , , 29 5,5,531 , , 30 5,5,531 , 1, 2 324 4,4,4,27 , , 25 4,4,4,27 , , 26 4,4,4,27 , 1,2 313 1,1,1,1,1,1, , 14 1,1,1,1,1,1, , 15 1,1,1,1,1,1, are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2,and 316 2,2,2,2,2,219, , 17 2,2,2,2,2,219, , 18 2,2,2,2,2,219, are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and 3 20 3,3,3,3,3,323 , , 21 3,3,3,3,3,323 , , 22 3,3,3,3,3,323 , are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and 3
.117118
Where we suppose.119
(A) 1, 1, 1, 1,1,1 > 0,, = 13,14,15(B) The functions 1, 1 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.Definition of()1, ()1:1(14 , ) ()1 (13 )(1)1(, ) ()1 ()1 (13 )(1).120121
(C) 21 14 , = ()1limG
1
,
= (
)
1
Definition of(13 )(1), ( 13 )(1) :Where (13 )(1), ( 13 )(1), ()1, ()1 are positive constants and = 13,14,15 .122They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
|()114 , ()114 , | ( 13 )(1)|14 14 |( 13 )(1) |()1 , ()1, | < ( 13 )(1)|| ||( 13 )(1) .123
124
125With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions
()114 , and()114 , . 14 , and 14 , are points belonging to the interval ( 13 )(1), ( 13 )(1) . It is to benoted that ()114 , is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if( 13 )(1) = 1 then the function(
)1
14 ,
, the first augmentation coefficient WOULD be absolutely continuous. .126
Definition of(13 )(1)
, ( 13 )(1)
:(D) (13 )(1), ( 13 )(1), are positive constants()1
( 13 )(1) , ()1
( 13 )(1) < 1.127
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
10/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2251 | Page
Definition of( 13 )(1), ( 13 )(1) :(E) There exists two constants ( 13 )(1) and (13 )(1) which together with ( 13 )(1), ( 13 )(1), (13)(1) and
(13 )(1) and the constants ()1, ( )1, ()1, ( )1, ()1, ()1, = 13,14,15,satisfy the inequalities
1
( 13 )(1) [ ()1 + ()1 + (13 )(1) + ( 13 )(1) ( 13 )(1)] < 11
( 13 )(1) [ (
)
1
+ (
)
1
+ (
13 )
(1) + (
13 )
(1) (
13 )
(1)] < 1.128
129
130
131
132Where we suppose.1342, 2, 2, 2,2,2 > 0, , = 16,17,18.135The functions 2, 2 are positive continuous increasing and bounded..136Definition of(pi)
2, (ri)2:.137 217 , ()2 162 .138 2(19 , ) ()2 ()2 ( 16 )(2) .139lim
2
2
17 ,
= (
)
2
.140
lim 2 19, = ()2 .141Definition of(16 )(2), ( 16 )(2) :Where (16 )(2), ( 16 )(2), ()2, ()2 are positive constants and = 16,17,18 .142They satisfy Lipschitz condition:.143
|( )217 , ( )217 , | ( 16 )(2)|17 17 |( 16 )(2) .144|( )219 , ( )219, | < ( 16 )(2)||19 19 ||( 16 )(2) .145With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )217 , and( )217 , .17 , And 17 , are points belonging to the interval ( 16 )(2), ( 16 )(2) . It is to be noted that ( )217 , is uniformlycontinuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if( 16 )(2) = 1 then the function ( )217 , , the SECONDaugmentation coefficient would be absolutely continuous. .146
Definition of(
16 )
(2), (
16 )
(2) :.147
(F) (16 )(2), ( 16 )(2), are positive constants()2( 16 )(2) , ()2( 16 )(2) < 1.148Definition of( 13 )(2), ( 13 )(2) :There exists two constants ( 16 )(2) and (16 )(2) which together with (16 )(2), ( 16 )(2), (16)(2) ( 16 )(2) and theconstants ()2, ()2 , ()2, ()2, ()2, ()2 , = 16,17,18,
satisfy the inequalities .1491
( M 16 )(2) [ (ai)2 + (ai)2 + ( A16 )(2) + ( P16 )(2) ( k16 )(2)] < 1 .1501
( 16 )(2) [ ()2 + ()2 + ( 16 )(2) + ( 16 )(2) ( 16 )(2)] < 1 .151Where we suppose.152
(G)
3,
3,
3,
3,
3,
3 > 0,
,
= 20,21,22
The functions 3
, 3
are positive continuous increasing and bounded.Definition of()3, (ri)3: 3(21 , ) ()3 (20 )(3) 3(23 , ) ()3 ()3 ( 20 )(3).1532 3 21 , = ()3limG 3 23 , = ()3Definition of(20 )(3), ( 20 )(3) :
Where (20 )(3), ( 20 )(3), ()3, ()3 are positive constants and = 20,21,22 .154155
156
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
|(
)
3
21
,
(
)
3
21 ,
|
(
20 )
(3)|
21
21
|
(
20 )
(3)
|( )323 , ( )323 , | < ( 20 )(3)||23 23 ||( 20 )(3) .157158159
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
11/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2252 | Page
With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )321 , and( )321 , .21 , And 21 , are points belonging to the interval ( 20 )(3), ( 20 )(3) . It is to be noted that ( )321 , isuniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if( 20 )(3) = 1 then the function ( )321 , , the THIRDaugmentation coefficient, would be absolutely continuous. .160
Definition of(20 )(3), ( 20 )(3) :(H) (
20 )
(3), (
20 )
(3), are positive constants
()3
( 20 )(3) , ()3
( 20 )(3) < 1.161There exists two constants There exists two constants ( 20 )(3) and ( 20 )(3) which together with(20 )(3), ( 20 )(3), (20)(3) ( 20 )(3) and the constants ()3, ()3, ()3, ()3, ()3, ()3, = 20,21,22,satisfy the inequalities
1
( 20 )(3) [ ()3 + ( )3 + (20 )(3) + ( 20 )(3) ( 20 )(3)] < 11
( 20 )(3) [ ()3 + ()3 + ( 20 )(3) + ( 20 )(3) ( 20 )(3)] < 1.162163
164
165
166
167
Where we suppose.168(I) 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 , 4 > 0, , = 24,25,26
(J) The functions 4, 4 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.Definition of()4, ()4: 4(25 , ) ()4 (24 )(4) 427, ()4 ()4 (24 )(4).169(K) 2 4 25 , = ()4
limG 4 27, = ()4Definition of(
24 )
(4), (
24 )
(4) :
Where (24 )(4), ( 24 )(4), ()4, ()4 are positive constants and = 24,25,26 .170They satisfy Lipschitz condition:|( )425 , ( )425 , | ( 24 )(4)|25 25 |( 24 )(4) |( )427 , ( )427, | < ( 24 )(4)||27 27 ||( 24 )(4) .171With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )425 , and( )425 , .25 , And 25 , are points belonging to the interval ( 24 )(4), ( 24 )(4) . It is to be noted that ( )425 , isuniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if( 24 )(4) = 4 then the function ( )425 , , the FOURTHaugmentation coefficient WOULD be absolutely continuous. .172
173
Defi174nition of(
24 )
(4), (
24 )
(4) :
(L) ( 24 )176175(4), ( 24 )(4), are positive constants(M) ()4( 24 )(4) , ()
4( 24 )(4) < 1 .174
Definition of( 24 )(4), ( 24 )(4) :(N) There exists two constants ( 24 )(4) and (24 )(4) which together with ( 24 )(4), ( 24 )(4), (24)(4) (24 )(4)
and the constants ()4, ()4, ()4, ()4, ()4, ()4, = 24,25,26,satisfy the inequalities
1
( 24 )(4) [ ()4 + ( )4 + (24 )(4) + ( 24 )(4) ( 24 )(4)] < 11
( 24 )(4) [ ()4 + ()4 + ( 24 )(4) + ( 24 )(4) ( 24 )(4)] < 1.175Where we suppose.176
(O)
5
,
5
,
5
,
5
,
5
,
5
> 0,
,
= 28,29,30
(P) The functions 5, 5 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.Definition of()5, ()5: 5(29 , ) ()5 (28 )(5)
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
12/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2253 | Page
531, ()5 ()5 (28 )(5).177(Q) 2 5 29 , = ()5
limG 5 31 , = ()5Definition of(28 )(5), ( 28 )(5) :Where (
28 )
(5), (
28 )
(5), (
)
5
, (
)
5
are positive constants and
= 28,29,30 .178
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
|( )529 , ( )529 , | ( 28 )(5)|29 29 |( 28 )(5) |( )531 , ( )531, | < ( 28 )(5)||31 31 ||( 28 )(5) .179With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )529 , and( )529 , .29 , and 29 , are points belonging to the interval ( 28 )(5), (28 )(5) . It is to be noted that ( )529, is uniformlycontinuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if( 28 )(5) = 5 then the function ( )529 , , theFIFTH augmentationcoefficient attributable would be absolutely continuous. .180
Definition of(28 )(5), ( 28 )(5) :(R) ( 28 )(5), ( 28 )(5), are positive constants
()5( 28 )(5) , ()
5( 28 )(5) < 1.181
Definition of(
28)(5), (
28)(5) :
(S) There exists two constants ( 28 )(5) and ( 28 )(5) which together with ( 28 )(5), ( 28 )(5), (28)(5) (28 )(5) andthe constants ()5, ()5, ()5, ()5, ()5, ()5, = 28,29,30, satisfy the inequalities1
( 28 )(5) [ ()5 + ( )5 + (28 )(5) + ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )(5)] < 11
( 28 )(5) [ ()5 + ()5 + ( 28 )(5) + ( 28 )(5) ( 28 )(5)] < 1.182Where we suppose.1836, 6, 6, 6, 6 , 6 > 0, , = 32,33,34(T) The functions 6, 6 are positive continuous increasing and bounded.
Definition of()6, ()6:
6(
33 ,
)
(
)6
(
32 )
(6)
6
(
35,
)
(
)
6
(
)
6
(
32)(6).184
(U) 2 6 33 , = ()6limG 6 35, = ()6
Definition of(32 )(6), ( 32 )(6) :Where (32 )(6), ( 32 )(6), ()6, ()6 are positive constants and = 32,33,34 .185
They satisfy Lipschitz condition:
|( )633 , ( )633 , | ( 32 )(6)|33 33 |( 32 )(6) |( )635 , ( )635, | < ( 32 )(6)||35 35 ||( 32 )(6) .186With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )633 , and( )633 , .
33 ,
and
33 ,
are points belonging to the interval
(
32 )(6), (
32 )(6)
. It is to be noted that (
)6
33 ,
is
uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if(
32)(6) = 6 then the function (
)
6
33,
, the SIXTH
augmentation coefficient would be absolutely continuous. .187
Definition of(32 )(6), ( 32 )(6) :(32 )(6), ( 32 )(6), are positive constants
()6( 32 )(6) , ()
6( 32 )(6) < 1.188
Definition of( 32 )(6), ( 32 )(6) :There exists two constants ( 32 )(6) and (32 )(6) which together with ( 32 )(6), ( 32 )(6), (32)(6) ( 32 )(6) and theconstants ()6, ()6 , ()6, ()6, ()6, ()6 , = 32,33,34,satisfy the inequalities
1
( 32 )(6) [ ()6 + ( )6 + (32 )(6) + ( 32 )(6) ( 32 )(6)] < 11
(
32 )
(6) [ (
)6 + (
)6 + (
32 )
(6) + (
32 )
(6) (
32 )
(6)] < 1.189
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
13/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2254 | Page
.190Theorem 1: if the conditions IN THE FOREGOING above are fulfilled, there exists a solution satisfying the conditions
Definition of 0 ,0 : 13 113 1 , 0 = 0 > 0 () (13 )(1)( 13 )(1) , 0 = 0 > 0 .191.192
Definition of 0 ,0 ( 16 )(2)(16 )(2) , 0 = 0 > 0() (16 )(2)( 16 )(2) , 0 = 0 > 0.193.194
( 20 )(3)(20 )(3) , 0 = 0 > 0() (20 )(3)( 20 )(3) , 0 = 0 > 0.195Definition of 0 ,0 : 24 424 4 , 0 = 0 > 0
(
)
(
24 )
(4)
(
24 )
(4)
,
0
=
0 > 0 .196
Definition of 0 ,0 : 28 528 5 , 0 = 0 > 0 () (28 )(5)( 28 )(5) , 0 = 0 > 0 .197198
Definition of 0 ,0 : 32 632 6 , 0 = 0 > 0 () (32 )(6)( 32 )(6) , 0 = 0 > 0 .199Proof: Consider operator (1) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , :+ + which satisfy.200
0 = 0
, 0 = 0
, 0
( 13 )(1)
,0
(13 )(1)
, .2010 0 ( 13 )(1)(13 )(1) .2020 0 ( 13 )(1)(13 )(1) .203By13 = 130 + (13)11413 (13 )1 + 13 )11413, 131313130 .20414 = 140 + (14)11313 (14 )1 + (14 )11413, 13 1413 130 .20515 = 150 + (15)11413 (15 )1 + (15 )11413, 13 1513130 .20613 = 130 + (13)11413 (13 )1 (13 )113, 131313 130 .20714 = 140 + (14)11313 (14 )1 (14 )113, 131413 130 .208T
15t
= T
15
0 +
(
15)
1
1413
(
15)
1
(
15)
1
13,
13 1513130
Where 13 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0, .209.210Proof:
Consider operator (2) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , :+ + which satisfy.2110 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 16 )(2) ,0 (16 )(2), .2120 0 ( 16 )(2)(16 )(2) .2130 0 ( 16 )(2)(16 )(2) .214By16 = 160 + (16)21716 (16 )2 + 16 )21716, 161616160 .21517
=
170 +
(
17)
2
1616 (
17)
2
+ (
17)
2
1716,
17 171616
0.216
18 = 180 + (18)21716 (18 )2 + (18 )21716, 16 1816160 .21716 = 160 + (16)21716 (16 )2 (16 )216, 161616 160 .218
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
14/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2255 | Page
17 = 170 + (17)21616 (17 )2 (17 )216, 161716 160 .21918 = 180 + (18)21716 (18 )2 (18 )216, 161816 160 Where 16 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0, .220Proof:
Consider operator
(3) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions
,
:
+
+ which satisfy .221
0 = 0
, 0 = 0
, 0
( 20 )(3)
,0
(20 )(3)
, .2220 0 ( 20 )(3)( 20 )(3) .2230 0 ( 20 )(3)(20 )(3) .224By20 = 200 + (20)32120 (20 )3 + 20 )32120, 20 2020 200 .22521 = 210 + (21)32020 (21 )3 + (21 )32120, 20 2120 200 .22622 = 220 + (22)32120 (22 )3 + (22 )32120, 20 2220 200 .22720 = 200 + (20)32120 (20 )3 (20 )320, 202020200 .22821 = 210 + (21)32020 (21 )3 (21 )320, 202120200 .229T
22
t
= T22
0 +
(
22)
3
21
20
(
22
)
3
(
22
)
3
20
,
20
22
20
20
0
Where 20 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0, .230Consider operator (4) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , :+ + which satisfy.2310 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 24 )(4) ,0 (24 )(4), .2320 0 ( 24 )(4)( 24 )(4) .2330 0 ( 24 )(4)(24 )(4) .234By24 = 240 + (24)42524 (24 )4 + 24 )42524, 24 2424 240 .23525 = 250 + (25)42424 (25 )4 + (25 )42524, 24 2524 240 .236
26
=
260 +
(
26)
4
25
24
(
26 )4 + (
26 )4
25
24
,
24
26
24
24
0
.237
24 = 240 + (24)42524 (24 )4 (24 )424, 242424240 .23825 = 250 + (25)42424 (25 )4 (25 )424, 242524240 .239T26t = T260 + (26)42524 (26 )4 (26 )424, 242624 240 Where 24 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0, .240
Consider operator (5) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions , :+ + which satisfy.241
2420 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 28 )(5) ,0 (28 )(5), .2430 0 ( 28 )(5)( 28 )(5) .2440
0
(
28 )
(5)
(28 )(5) .245
By28 = 280 + (28)52928 (28 )5 + 28 )52928, 282828 280 .24629 = 290 + (29)52828 (29 )5 + (29 )52928, 28 2928280 .24730 = 300 + (30)52928 (30 )5 + (30 )52928, 28 3028 280 .24828 = 280 + (28)52928 (28 )5 (28 )528, 282828280 .24929 = 290 + (29)52828 (29 )5 (29 )528, 28 2928280 .250T30t = T300 + (30)52928 (30 )5 (30 )528, 28 3028280 Where 28 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0, .251Consider operator
(6) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions
,
:
+
+ which satisfy .252
0 = 0 , 0 = 0 , 0 ( 32 )(6) ,0 (32 )(6), .2530 0 ( 32 )(6)( 32 )(6) .2540 0 ( 32 )(6)(32 )(6) .255
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
15/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2256 | Page
By32 = 320 + (32)63332 (32 )6 + 32 )63332, 32 3232 320 .25633 = 330 + (33)63232 (33 )6 + (33 )63332, 32 3332 320 .25734 = 340 + (34)63332 (34 )6 + (34 )63332,32 3432 320 .258
32
=
320 +
(
32)
6
33
32
(
32
)
6
(
32
)
6
32
,
32
32
32
32
0
.259
33 = 330 + (33)63232 (33 )6 (33 )632, 323332320 .260T34t = T340 + (34)63332 (34 )6 (34 )632, 323432 320 Where 32 is the integrand that is integrated over an interval 0, .261262
(a) The operator (1) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that13 130 + (13)1 140 +(13 )(1)( 13 )(1)130 13 =1 + (13)1140 + (13)1( 13 )(1)( 13 )(1) ( 13 )(1) 1.263From which it follows that
13
130
(
13 )
(1)
(
13)
1( 13 )
(1)
(
13 )
(1) +
140
( 13 )(1)+140
140
+ (
13 )
(1)
0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 1.264Analogous inequalities hold also for 14 ,15 ,13 ,14 ,15.265The operator (2) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that.26616 160 + (16)2 170 +(16 )(6)( 16 )(2)160 16 = 1 + (16)2170 + (16 )2(16 )(2)( 16 )(2) ( 16 )(2) 1.267From which it follows that
16 160 (16 )(2) (16)2( 16 )(2) ( 16 )(2) + 170 ( 16 )(2)+170170 + ( 16 )(2).268
Analogous inequalities hold also for 17 ,18 ,16 ,17 ,18 .269(a) The operator
(3) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that
20 200 + (20)3 210 +(20 )(3)( 20 )(3)200 20 =1 + (20)3210 + (20)3( 20 )(3)(20 )(3) ( 20 )(3) 1.270From which it follows that
20 200 ( 20 )(3) (20)3( 20 )(3) ( 20 )(3) + 210 ( 20 )(3)+210210 + ( 20 )(3).271
Analogous inequalities hold also for 21 ,22 ,20 ,21 , 22 .272(b) The operator (4) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that24 240 + (24)4 250 +(24 )(4)( 24 )(4)240 24 =
1 + (
24)
4
250 +
(24)4( 24 )(4)(
24 )
(4)
( 24 )(4)
1
.273
From which it follows that24 240 ( 24 )(4) (24)4( 24 )(4) ( 24 )(4) + 250 ( 24 )(4)+250250 + ( 24 )(4)0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 1.274
(c) The operator (5) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that28 280 + (28)5 290 +(28 )(5)( 28 )(5)280 28 =1 + (28)5290 + (28)5( 28 )(5)( 28 )(5) ( 28 )(5) 1.275From which it follows that
28
280
( 28 )(5)
(28)5
(
28 )
(5)
(
28 )
(5) +
290
( 28 )(5)+290290 + (
28 )
(5)
0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 1.276(d) The operator (6) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
16/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2257 | Page
32 320 + (32)6 330 +(32 )(6)( 32 )(6)320 32 =1 + (32)6330 + (32)6( 32 )(6)(32 )(6) ( 32 )(6) 1.277From which it follows that
32
320
( 32 )(6)
(32)6
(
32 )
(6)
(
32 )
(6) +
330
( 32 )(6)+330330 + (
32 )
(6)
0 is as defined in the statement of theorem 6Analogous inequalities hold also for 25 ,26 ,24 ,25 , 26 .278279
.280
It is now sufficient to take()1
( 13 )(1) , ( )1
( 13 )(1) < 1 and to choose( P13 )(1) and ( Q13 )(1) large to have.281
282
()1(13)1 ( 13)1 + ( 13 )(1) + 0
( 13 )(1)+00 ( 13 )(1).283()1
(13)1 ( 13 )(1) + 0 ( 13 )(1)+0
0 + (13 )(1) (13 )(1).284In order that the operator (1) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS intoitself.285
The operator (1) is a contraction with respect to the metric 1,1, 2,2 = {+
1 2(13)1 ,+ 1 2(13)1}.286Indeed if we denote
Definition of
,
:
, = (1)
(,)It results131 2 (13)10 141 142( 13)113( 13)113 13 + {(13 )1131 132( 13)113(13)1130 +(13 )1141, 13131 132( 13)113( 13)113 +132|(13 )1141, 13 (13 )1142, 13| (13)113( 13)113}13Where 13 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, tFrom the hypotheses it follows.2871 2( 13)1 1
( 13)1 (13)1 + (13 )1 + (13)1 + ( 13)1( 13)1 1,1; 2,2And analogous inequalities for
. Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows.288
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (
13)
1
and (
13)
1
depending also on tcan be considered as not conformal with the
reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition necessary to prove the uniqueness of
the solution bounded by ( 13)1( 13)1 ( 13)1(13)1 respectively of+.If instead of proving the existence of the solution on +, we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to considerthat ( )1 and ( )1, = 13,14,15 depend only on T14 and respectively on ( ) and hypothesis canreplaced by a usual Lipschitz condition..289Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0From 19 to 24 it results 0 ( )1( )11413,13130 0 0( )1 > 0 for t > 0.290291
Definition of ( 13)1
1,(13)1
3 :Remark 3: if13 is bounded, the same property have also 14 15 . indeed if13 < ( 13)1 it follows 14 (13)11 (14 )114 and by integrating
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
17/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2258 | Page
14 (13)12 = 140 + 2(14)1( 13)11/(14 )1In the same way , one can obtain15 (13)13 = 150 + 2(15)1( 13)12/(15 )1If14 15 is bounded, the same property follows for 13 , 15 and 13 , 14 respectively..292
Remark 4: If13 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 14 15 . The proof is analogous with thepreceding one. An analogous property is true if
14 is bounded from below..293
Remark 5: If T13 is bounded from below and lim (( )1 (, ) ) = (14 )1 then 14 .Definition of 1 and 1 :Indeed let 1 be so that for > 1(14)1 ( )1(, ) < 1,13 () > 1.294Then
14 (14)11 114 which leads to14 (14)111 1 1+ 140 1 If we take t such that 1 = 12 it results14 (14)112 , = 21 By taking now 1 sufficiently small one sees that T14 is unbounded. The same propertyholds for 15 iflim (15 )1 , = (15 )1We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions . 295.296
It is now sufficient to take(
)
2
( 16 )(2) ,(
)
2
( 16 )(2) < 1 and to choose( 16 )(2) (16 )(2) large to have.297()2
(16)2 ( 16)2 + ( 16 )(2) + 0( 16 )(2)+00 ( 16 )(2).298
()2(16)2 ( 16 )(2) + 0
( 16 )(2)+00 + (16 )(2) (16 )(2).299In order that the operator (2) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying .300The operator
(2) is a contraction with respect to the metric
191
, 191
, 192
, 192
= {+
1 2(16)2 ,+ 1 2(16)2}.301Indeed if we denote
Definition of19 ,19 : 19 ,19 = (2)(19 ,19).302It results161 2 (16)20 171 172( 16)216( 16)216 16 + {(16 )2161 162( 16)216(16)2160 +(16 )2171, 16161 162( 16)216( 16)216 +
16
2|(
16 )2
17
1,
16
(
16 )2
17
2,
16
|
(16)216
( 16)216}
16 .303
Where
16represents integrand that is integrated over the interval
0,
From the hypotheses it follows.304191 192e( M16)2t1
( M16)2 (16)2 + (16 )2 + ( A 16)2 + ( P16)2( 16)2d191, 191; 192, 192 .305And analogous inequalities for G and T. Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows.306Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (16 )2 and (16 )2 depending also on tcan be considered as not conformal with thereality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition necessary to prove the uniqueness of
the solution bounded by ( P16)2e( M16)2t and ( Q 16)2e( M16)2t respectively of+.If instead of proving the existence of the solution on +, we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to considerthat ( )2 and ( )2, = 16,17,18 depend only on T17 and respectively on 19(and not on t) and hypothesis canreplaced by a usual Lipschitz condition..307
Remark 2: There does not exist any t where G
t
= 0 and T
t
= 0
From 19 to 24 it results
Gt G0e ( )2( )2T1716,16d16t0 0Tt T0e( )2t > 0 for t > 0.308
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
18/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2259 | Page
Definition of ( M16)21 ,( M16)22 and ( M16)23 :Remark 3: ifG16 is bounded, the same property have also G17 and G18 . indeed if
G16 < ( M16)2 it follows dG 17dt ( M16)21 (17 )2G17 and by integratingG17 ( M16)22 = G170 + 2(17)2( M16)21/(17 )2In the same way , one can obtain
G18
( M
16)
2
3= G
18
0 + 2(
18)
2
( M
16)
2
2/(
18)
2
IfG17 or G18 is bounded, the same property follows for G16 , G18 and G16 , G17 respectively..309
310
Remark 4: IfG16 is bounded, from below, the same property holds for G17 and G18 . The proof is analogous with thepreceding one. An analogous property is true ifG17 is bounded from below..311
Remark 5: If T16 is bounded from below and limt(( )2 (19t, t)) = (17 )2 then T17 .Definition of 2 and 2 :Indeed let t2 be so that for t > t2(17)2 ( )2(19t, t) < 2, T16 (t) > 2 .312Then
dT 17
dt (17)22 2T17 which leads to
T17
(
17)
22
2 1
e
2t
+ T17
0 e
2t If we take t such that e
2t =
1
2
it results .313
T17 (17)222 , = log 22 By taking now 2 sufficiently small one sees that T17 is unbounded. The same propertyholds for T18 iflim (18 )2 19t, t = (18 )2We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions . 314.315
It is now sufficient to take()3
( 20 )(3) , ( )3
( 20 )(3) < 1 and to choose( P20 )(3) and ( Q20 )(3) large to have.316
()3(20)3 ( 20)3 + ( 20 )(3) + 0
( 20 )(3)+00 ( 20 )(3).317()
3
(20)3 ( 20 )(3) + 0
(
20 )(3)+
0
0
+ (20 )(3) ( 20 )(3).318In order that the operator (3) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , into itself.319The operator (3) is a contraction with respect to the metric 231, 231, 232, 232 = {+
1 2(20)3 ,+ 1 2(20)3}.320Indeed if we denote
Definition of23 ,23 :23 , 23 = (3)23, 23.321It results
20
1
2
(
20)
3
0
21
1
21
2
(
20)3
20
(
20)3
20
20
+
{(20 )3201 202( 20)320( 20)3200 +(20 )3211, 20201 202( 20)320( 20)320 +202|(20 )3211, 20 (20 )3212,20| ( 20)320(20)320}20Where 20 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows.322
3231 2( 20)3 1
( 20)3 (20)3 + (20 )3 + ( 20)3 + ( 20)3( 20)3 231, 231; 232 , 232And analogous inequalities for
. Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows.324
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (20 )3
and (20 )3
depending also on tcan be considered as not conformal with thereality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition necessary to prove the uniqueness ofthe solution bounded by ( 20)3( 20)3 ( 20)3( 20)3 respectively of+.
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
19/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2260 | Page
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on +, we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to considerthat ( )3 and ( )3, = 20,21,22 depend only on T21 and respectively on 23( ) and hypothesis canreplaced by a usual Lipschitz condition..325
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0From 19 to 24 it results
0
( )3( )32120,20200
0
0( )3
> 0 for t > 0.326Definition of ( 20)31,( 20)32( 20)33 :Remark 3: if20 is bounded, the same property have also 21 22 . indeed if20 < (20)3 it follows 21 (20)31 (21 )321 and by integrating21 (20)32 = 210 + 2(21)3(20)31/(21 )3In the same way , one can obtain22 (20)33 = 220 + 2(22)3(20)32/(22 )3If21 22 is bounded, the same property follows for 20 , 22 and 20 , 21 respectively..327
Remark 4: If20 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 21 22 . The proof is analogous with thepreceding one. An analogous property is true if21 is bounded from below..328Remark 5: If T20 is bounded from below and lim
((
)3
23
,
)
= (
21 )3 then
21
.
Definition of 3 and 3 :Indeed let 3 be so that for > 3(21)3 ( )323, < 3 ,20 () > 3.329330
Then21 (21)33 321 which leads to21 (21)333 1 3+ 210 3 If we take t such that 3 = 12 it results21 (21)332 , = 23 By taking now 3 sufficiently small one sees that T21 is unbounded. The same property
holds for 22 iflim (22 )3 23, = (22 )3We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions . 331
.332
It is now sufficient to take()4( 24 )(4) , ( )
4( 24 )(4) < 1 and to choose
( P24 )(4) and ( Q24 )(4) large to have.333()4
(24)4 ( 24)4 + ( 24 )(4) + 0( 24 )(4)+00 ( 24 )(4).334
()4(24)4 ( 24 )(4) + 0
( 24 )(4)+00 + (24 )(4) ( 24 )(4).335In order that the operator (4) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , satisfying IN to itself.336The operator
(4) is a contraction with respect to the metric
271
, 271
, 272
, 272
= {+
1 2(24)4 ,+ 1 2(24)4}Indeed if we denote
Definition of27 , 27 : 27 , 27 = (4)(27, 27)It results241 2 (24)40 251 252( 24)424( 24)424 24 + {(24 )4241 242( 24)424(24)4240 +
(24 )4251, 24241 242( 24)424( 24)424 +
24
2|(
24 )4
25
1,
24
(
24 )4
25
2,
24
|
( 24)424
( 24)424}
24
Where
24represents integrand that is integrated over the interval
0, t
From the hypotheses it follows.337
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
20/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2261 | Page
338271 272( 24 )4 1
( 24)4 (24)4 + (24 )4 + ( 24)4 + ( 24)4( 24)4 271, 271; 272 , 272And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows.339Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (
24 )4 and (
24 )4 depending also on tcan be considered as not conformal with the
reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition necessary to prove the uniqueness of
the solution bounded by ( 24)4( 24)4 ( 24)4( 24)4 respectively of+.If instead of proving the existence of the solution on +, we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to considerthat ( )4 and ( )4, = 24,25,26 depend only on T25 and respectively on 27( ) and hypothesis canreplaced by a usual Lipschitz condition..340
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0From 19 to 24 it results 0 ( )4( )42524,24240 0 0( )4 > 0 for t > 0.341Definition of ( 24)41,( 24)42( 24)43 :Remark 3: if24 is bounded, the same property have also 25 26 . indeed if
24 < (
24)
4
it follows
25
(
24)
4
1
(
25
)
4
25 and by integrating
25 (24)42 = 250 + 2(25)4(24)41/(25 )4In the same way , one can obtain26 (24)43 = 260 + 2(26)4(24)42/(26 )4If25 26 is bounded, the same property follows for 24 , 26 and 24 , 25 respectively..342
Remark 4: If24 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 25 26 . The proof is analogous with thepreceding one. An analogous property is true if25 is bounded from below..343Remark 5: If T24 is bounded from below and lim (( )4 (27, ) ) = (25 )4 then 25 .Definition of 4 and 4 :Indeed let 4 be so that for > 4(25)4 ( )4(27, ) < 4 ,24 () > 4.344Then
25
(
25)
4
4
4
25 which leads to
25 (25)444 1 4+ 250 4 If we take t such that 4 = 12 it results25 (25)442 , = 24 By taking now 4 sufficiently small one sees that T25 is unbounded. The same propertyholds for 26 iflim (26 )4 27, = (26 )4We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions ANALOGOUS inequalities hold also
for 29 ,30 ,28 ,29 , 30 .345.346
It is now sufficient to take()5
( 28 )(5) , ()5
( 28 )(5) < 1 and to choose( P28 )(5) and ( Q28 )(5) large to have.347
(
)
5
(28)5 ( 28)5 + ( 28 )(5) + 0( 28 )(5)+
0
0
( 28 )(5).348()5
(28)5 ( 28 )(5) + 0( 28 )(5)+00 + (28 )(5) ( 28 )(5).349
In order that the operator (5) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , into itself.350The operator (5) is a contraction with respect to the metric 311, 311, 312, 312 = {+
1 2(28)5 ,+ 1 2(28)5}Indeed if we denote
Definition of31 , 31 : 31 , 31 = (5)31, 31It results281 2 (28)50 291 292( 28)528( 28)528 28 +
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
21/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2262 | Page
{(28 )5281 282( 28)528( 28)5280 +(28 )5291, 28281 282( 28)528( 28)528 +282|(28 )5291, 28 (28 )5292,28| ( 28)528(28)528}28Where 28 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows.351
352311 312( 28 )5 1
( 28)5 (28)5 + (28 )5 + ( 28)5 + ( 28)5( 28)5 311, 311; 312 , 312And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis (35,35,36) the result follows.353Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (28 )5 and (28 )5 depending also on tcan be considered as not conformal with thereality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition necessary to prove the uniqueness of
the solution bounded by ( 28)5( 28)5 ( 28)5( 28)5 respectively of+.If instead of proving the existence of the solution on +, we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to considerthat ( )5 and ( )5, = 28,29,30 depend only on T29 and respectively on 31( ) and hypothesis canreplaced by a usual Lipschitz condition..354
Remark 2: There does not exist any
where
= 0
= 0
From GLOBAL EQUATIONS it results 0 ( )5( )52928,28280 0 0( )5 > 0 for t > 0.355Definition of ( 28)51,( 28)52( 28)53 :Remark 3: if28 is bounded, the same property have also 2930 . indeed if28 < (28)5 it follows 29 (28)51 (29 )529 and by integrating29 (28)52 = 290 + 2(29)5( 28)51/(29 )5In the same way , one can obtain30 (28)53 = 300 + 2(30)5(28)52/(30 )5If
29
30 is bounded, the same property follows for
28 ,
30 and
28 ,
29 respectively..356
Remark 4: If
28
bounded, from below, the same property holds for
29
30. The proof is analogous with the
preceding one. An analogous property is true if29 is bounded from below..357Remark 5: If T28 is bounded from below and lim (( )5 (31, ) ) = (29 )5 then 29 .Definition of 5 and 5 :Indeed let 5 be so that for > 5
(29)5 ( )5(31, ) < 5,28 () > 5.358359
Then29 (29)55 529 which leads to29 (29)555 1 5+ 290 5 If we take t such that 5 = 12 it results
29 (
29)
5
5
2 , = 2
5 By taking now 5 sufficiently small one sees that T29 is unbounded. The same propertyholds for 30 iflim (30 )5 31, = (30 )5We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutionsAnalogous inequalities hold also for 33 ,34 ,32 ,33 , 34 .360.361
It is now sufficient to take()6
( 32 )(6) , ( )6
( 32 )(6) < 1 and to choose( P32 )(6) and ( Q32 )(6) large to have.362
()6(32)6 ( 32)6 + ( 32 )(6) + 0
( 32 )(6)+00 ( 32 )(6).363(
)
6
(32)6 ( 32 )(6) + 0
( 32 )(6)+0
0
+ (32 )(6) ( 32 )(6).364In order that the operator (6) transforms the space of sextuples of functions , into itself.365The operator (6) is a contraction with respect to the metric
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
22/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2263 | Page
351, 351, 352, 352 = {+
1 2(32)6 ,+ 1 2(32)6}Indeed if we denote
Definition of
35
,
35
:
35
,
35
=
(6)
35
,
35
It results
321 2 (32)60 331 332( 32)632( 32)632 32 + {(32 )6321 322( 32)632( 32)6320 +(32 )6331, 32321 322( 32)632( 32)632 +322|(32 )6331, 32 (32 )6332,32| ( 32)632(32)632}32Where 32 represents integrand that is integrated over the interval 0, t
From the hypotheses it follows.366
367351 352( 32 )6 1
(
32)
6
(
32)
6 + (
32 )6 + (
32)
6 + (
32)6(
32)
6
35
1,
35
1;
35
2,
35
2
And analogous inequalities for . Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows.368Remark 1: The fact that we supposed (32 )6 and (32 )6 depending also on tcan be considered as not conformal with thereality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition necessary to prove the uniqueness of
the solution bounded by ( 32)6( 32)6 ( 32)6( 32)6 respectively of+.If instead of proving the existence of the solution on +, we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to considerthat ( )6 and ( )6, = 32,33,34 depend only on T33 and respectively on 35( ) and hypothesis canreplaced by a usual Lipschitz condition..369
Remark 2: There does not exist any where = 0 = 0From 69 to 32 it results 0 ( )6( )63332,32320 0
0
( )6 > 0 for t > 0.370
Definition of ( 32)6
1,
( 32)6
2( 32)6
3 :Remark 3: if32 is bounded, the same property have also 33 34 . indeed if32 < (32)6 it follows 33 (32)61 (33 )633 and by integrating33 (32)62 = 330 + 2(33)6(32)61/(33 )6In the same way , one can obtain34 (32)63 = 340 + 2(34)6(32)62/(34 )6If33 34 is bounded, the same property follows for 32 , 34 and 32 , 33 respectively..371
Remark 4: If32 bounded, from below, the same property holds for 33 34 . The proof is analogous with thepreceding one. An analogous property is true if33 is bounded from below..372Remark 5: If T32 is bounded from below and lim (( )6 (35, ) ) = (33 )6 then 33 .Definition of
6 and
6 :
Indeed let
6 be so that for
>
6
(33)6 ( )635, < 6,32 () > 6.373374
Then33 (33)66 633 which leads to33 (33)666 1 6+ 330 6 If we take t such that 6 = 12 it results33 (33)662 , = 26 By taking now 6 sufficiently small one sees that T33 is unbounded. The same property
holds for 34 iflim (34 )6 35, , = (34 )6We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions .375376
Behavior of the solutionsIf we denote and define
Definition of (1)1 , (2)1 , (1)1 , (2)1 :(a) 1)1 , (2)1 , (1)1 , (2)1 four constants satisfying
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
23/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2264 | Page
(2)1 (13 )1 + (14 )1 (13 )114 , + (14 )114 , (1)1(2)1 (13 )1 + (14 )1 (13 )1, (14 )1, (1)1.377Definition of (1 )1, (2)1, (1)1, (2)1,1,1 :By (1)1 > 0 , (2)1 < 0 and respectively (1)1 > 0 , (2)1 < 0 the roots of the equations (14)112 +(
1)
1
1
(
13)
1 = 0 and (
14)
1
1
2
+ (
1)
1
1
(
13)
1 = 0.378Definition of (
1 )
1
, , (
2)
1
, (
1)
1
, (
2)
1
:
By (1)1 > 0 , (2)1 < 0 and respectively (1)1 > 0 , (2)1 < 0 the roots of the equations (14)112 +(2)11 (13)1 = 0 and (14)112 + (2)11 (13)1 = 0 .379Definition of (1)1 , (2)1 , (1)1, (2)1, (0 )1 :-(b) If we define (1)1 , (2)1 , (1)1, (2)1 by
(2)1 = (0)1, (1)1 = (1)1, (0)1 < (1)1(2)1 = (1)1, (1)1 = (1)1 , (1)1 < (0)1 < (1)1,and (0 )1 = 130140
( 2)1 = (1)1, (1)1 = (0 )1, (1)1 < (0)1 .380and analogously
(
2)
1 = (
0)1, (
1)
1 = (
1)1,
(
0)
1 < (
1)1
(2)1 = (1)1, (1)1 = (1)1 , (1)1 < (0)1 < (1)1,and (0)1 = 130140 ( 2)1 = (1)1, (1)1 = (0)1, (1)1 < (0)1 where (1)1, (1)1
are defined respectively.381382Then the solution satisfies the inequalities130 (1)1(13 )1 13 () 130 (1)1 where ()1 is defined
1
(1)1 130 (1)1(13)1 14 () 1(2)1 130 (1)1 .383(
(15 )1130(
1)
1
(
1)
1
(
13 )
1
(
2)
1
(1)1(13 )1
(2)1
+
150
(2)1
15(
)
(15 )1130
(
2)
1
(
1)
1
(
15
)
1
[
(1)1
(15 )1 ] + 150 (15 )1) .384130 (1)1 13 () 130 (1)1+(13 )1 .3851
(1)1 130 (1)1 13() 1(2)1130 (1)1+(13 )1 .386(15)1130
(1)1(1)1(15 )1 (1)1 (15 )1+ 150 (15 )1 15() (15)1130
(2)1(1)1+(13 )1+(2)1 (1)1+(13)1 (2)1 + 150 (2)1 .387
Definition of(1)1, (2)1, (1)1, (2)1:-Where (1)1 = (13)1(2)1 (13 )1
(
2)
1
= (
15)
1
(
15)
1
(1)1 = (13)1(2)1 (13 )1(2)1 = (15 )1 (15)1.388Behavior of the solutionsIf we denote and define.389
Definition of (1)2 , (2)2 , (1)2 , (2)2 :1)2 , (2)2 , (1)2 , (2)2 four constants satisfying.390(2)2 (16 )2 + (17 )2 (16 )2T17 , + (17 )2T17 , (1)2 .391(2)2 (16 )2 + (17 )2 (16 )219, (17 )219, (1)2 .392Definition of (1 )2, (2)2 , (1)2, (2)2 :.393By (1)2 > 0 , (2)2 < 0 and respectively (1)2 > 0 , (2)2 < 0 the roots.394of the equations (
17)
2
2
2
+ (
1)
2
2
(
16)
2 = 0 .395and (14)
2
2
2
+ (1)2
2
(16)2
= 0 and.396Definition of (1 )2, , (2)2, (1)2, (2)2 :.397By (1)2 > 0 , (2)2 < 0 and respectively (1)2 > 0 , (2)2 < 0 the.398roots of the equations (17)222 + (2)22 (16)2 = 0.399
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
24/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2265 | Page
and (17)222 + (2)22 (16)2 = 0 .400Definition of (1)2 , (2)2 , (1)2, (2)2 :-.401If we define (1)2 , (2)2 , (1)2, (2)2 by.402(2)2 = (0)2, (1)2 = (1)2, (0)2 < (1)2 .403(2)2 = (1)2, (1)2 = (1)2 , (1)2 < (0)2 < (1)2,and (0)
2
=G16
0
G170 .404( 2)2 = (1)2, (1)2 = (0 )2, (1)2 < (0 )2 .405and analogously
(2)2 = (0)2, (1)2 = (1)2, (0)2 < (1)2(2)2 = (1)2, (1)2 = (1)2 , (1)2 < (0)2 < (1)2,and (0)2 = T160T170 .406( 2)2 = (1)2, (1)2 = (0)2, (1)2 < (0)2 .407Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
G160 e(S1)2(16)2t 16 G160 e(S1)2t.408
(
)2 is defined.409
1
(1)2G
16
0 e
(S1)
2
(
16 )
2
t
17(
)
1
(2)2G
16
0 e(S1)
2
t .410
((18)2G160
(1)2(S1)2(16)2(S2)2 e(S1)2(16 )2t e(S2)2t + G180 e(S2)2t G18() (18)2G160(2)2(S1)2(18 )2 [e(S1)2te(18 )2t] + G180 e(18 )2t) .411T16
0 e(R1)2 16() T160 e(R1)2+(16)2 .412
1
(1)2 T160 e(R1)2 16() 1(2)2 T160 e(R1)2+(16 )2 .413(18 )2T160
(1)2(R1)2(18 )2 e(R1)2 e(18 )2 + T180 e(18 )2 18() (18)2T160
(2)2(R1)2+(16)2+(R2)2 e(R1)2+(16)2 e(R2)2 + T180 e(R2)2 .414Definition of(S1)
2, (S2)2, (R1)2, (R2)2:-.415Where (S1)
2
= (
16)
2
(
2)
2
(
16
)
2
(S2)2 = (18)2 (18)2 .416(1)2 = (16)2(2)1 (16 )2(R2)
2 = (18 )2 (18)2.417.418Behavior of the solutionsIf we denote and define
Definition of (1)3 , (2)3 , (1)3 , (2)3 :(a) 1)3 , (2)3 , (1)3 , (2)3 four constants satisfying(2)3 (20 )3 + (21 )3 (20 )321 , + (21 )321 , (1)3(2)3 (20 )3 + (21 )3 (20 )3, (21 )323, (1)3.419Definition of (
1 )
3, (
2)
3, (
1)
3, (
2)
3 :(b)
By (1)
3
> 0 , (2)3
< 0 and respectively (1)3
> 0 , (2)3
< 0 the roots of the equations (21)3
3
2
+(1)33 (20)3 = 0and (21)332 + (1)33 (20)3 = 0 andBy (1)3 > 0 , (2)3 < 0 and respectively (1)3 > 0 , (2)3 < 0 the
roots of the equations (21)332 + (2)33 (20)3 = 0and (21)332 + (2)33 (20)3 = 0.420
Definition of (1)3 , (2)3 , (1)3, (2)3 :-(c) If we define (1)3 , (2)3 , (1)3, (2)3 by
(2)3 = (0)3, (1)3 = (1)3, (0)3 < (1)3(2)3 = (1)3, (1)3 = (1)3 , (1)3 < (0)3 < (1)3,and (
0 )
3
=
200
210
( 2)3 = (1)3, (1)3 = (0 )3, (1 )3 < (0)3 .421and analogously(2)3 = (0)3, (1)3 = (1)3, (0)3 < (1)3
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
25/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2266 | Page
(2)3 = (1)3, (1)3 = (1)3 , (1)3 < (0)3 < (1)3, and (0)3 = 200210 ( 2)3 = (1)3, (1)3 = (0)3, (1)3 < (0)3Then the solution satisfies the inequalities200 (1)3(20)3 20 () 200 (1)3
(
)3 is defined .422
4231
(1)3 200 (1)3(20)3 21() 1(2)3 200 (1)3 .424(
(22 )3200(1)3(1)3(20 )3(2)3 (1)3(20 )3 (2)3 + 220 (2)3 22() (22 )3200(2)3(1)3(22 )3 [(1)3 (22 )3 ] + 220 (22 )3) .425200 (1)3 20() 200 (1)3+(20)3 .426
1
(1)3 200 (1)3 20 () 1(2)3 200 (1)3+(20 )3 .427(22 )3200
(1)3(1)3(22 )3 (1)3 (22 )3+ 220 (22 )3 22() (22)3200
(
2)3
(
1)
3+(
20 )3+(
2)3
(1)3+(20)3
(2)3
+
220
(2)3 .428
Definition of(1)3, (2)3, (1)3, (2)3:-Where (1)3 = (20)3(2)3 (20 )3(2)3 = (22)3 (22)3(1)3 = (20)3(2)3 (20 )3(2)3 = (22 )3 (22 )3.429
.430
.431
Behavior of the solutionsIf we denote and define
Definition of (1)4 , (2)4 , (1)4 , (2)4 :(d)
(1)
4
, (2)4
, (1)4
, (2)4
four constants satisfying
(2)4 (24 )4 + (25 )4 (24 )425 , + (25 )425 , (1)4(2)4 (24 )4 + (25 )4 (24 )427, (25 )427, (1)4
432
Definition of (1 )4, (2)4, (1)4, (2)4,4,4 :(e) By (1)4 > 0 , (2)4 < 0 and respectively (1)4 > 0 , (2)4 < 0 the roots of the equations
(25)442 + (1)44 (24)4 = 0and (25)442 + (1)44 (24)4 = 0 and
433
Definition of (1 )4, , (2)4, (1)4, (2)4 :By (1)4 > 0 , (2)4 < 0 and respectively (1)4 > 0 , (2)4 < 0 theroots of the equations (25)442 + (2)44 (24)4 = 0and (25)442 + (2)44 (24)4 = 0
Definition of (1)4 , (2)4 , (1)4, (2)4, (0 )4 :-(f) If we define (1)4 , (2)4 , (1)4, (2)4 by
(2)4 = (0)4, (1)4 = (1)4, (0)4 < (1)4(
2)
4
= (
1)
4
, (
1)
4
= (
1)
4
,
(
4)
4
< (
0)
4
< (
1)
4
,
and (0 )4 = 240250 ( 2)4 = (4)4, (1)4 = (0 )4, (4)4 < (0)4
434435
436
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
26/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2267 | Page
and analogously
(2)4 = (0)4, (1)4 = (1)4, (0)4 < (1)4(
2)
4 = (
1)
4, (
1)
4 = (
1)
4 ,
(
1)
4 < (
0)
4 < (
1)
4,and (0)4 = 24
0
250 ( 2)4 = (1)4, (1)4 = (0)4, (1)4 < (0)4 where (1)4, (1)4
are defined by 59 and 64 respectively
437
438
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
240 (1)4(24 )4 24 240 (1)4 where ()4 is defined
439440
441442443
444445
1
(1)4 240 (1)4(24)4 25 1(2)4 240 (1)4 446447 (26)4240
(1)4(1)4(24 )4(2)4 (1)4(24 )4 (2)4 + 260 (2)4 26 (26)4240(2)4(1)4(26)4(1)4(26)4+260(26)4
448
240 (1)4 24 240 (1)4+(24)4 4491
(
1)4
240
(1)4
24 (
)
1
(
2)4
240
(1)4+(24 )4 450
(26 )4240(1)4(1)4(26 )4 (1)4 (26 )4+ 260 (26 )4 26()
(26)4240(2)4(1)4+(24 )4+(2)4 (1)4+(24)4 (2)4 + 260 (2)4
451
Definition of(1)4, (2)4, (1)4, (2)4:-Where (1)4 = (24)4(2)4 (24 )4
(2)4 = (26)4 (26)4(1)
4
= (24)4
(2)4
(24 )4
(2)4 = (26 )4 (26 )4
452
453
Behavior of the solutionsIf we denote and define
Definition of (1)5 , (2)5 , (1)5 , (2)5 :(g) (1)5 , (2)5 , (1)5 , (2)5 four constants satisfying
(
2)
5
(
28 )5 + (
29 )5
(
28 )5
29 ,
+ (
29 )5
29 ,
(
1)
5
(2)5 (28 )5 + (29 )5 (28 )531, (29 )531, (1)5
454
Definition of (1 )5, (2)5, (1)5, (2)5,5,5 : 455
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
27/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2268 | Page
(h) By (1)5 > 0 , (2)5 < 0 and respectively (1)5 > 0 , (2)5 < 0 the roots of the equations(29)552 + (1)55 (28)5 = 0and (29)552 + (1)55 (28)5 = 0 and
Definition of (
1 )
5, , (
2)
5, (
1)
5, (
2)
5 :By (1)5 > 0 , (2)5 < 0 and respectively (1)5 > 0 , (2)5 < 0 theroots of the equations (29)552 + (2)55 (28)5 = 0
and (29)552 + (2)55 (28)5 = 0Definition of (1)5 , (2)5 , (1)5, (2)5, (0 )5 :-(i) If we define (1)5 , (2)5 , (1)5, (2)5 by
(2)5 = (0)5, (1)5 = (1)5, (0)5 < (1)5(2)5 = (1)5, (1)5 = (1)5 , (1)5 < (0)5 < (1)5,and (
0 )
5
=
28029
0
( 2)5 = (1)5, (1)5 = (0 )5, (1 )5 < (0)5
456
and analogously
(2)5 = (0)5, (1)5 = (1)5, (0)5 < (1)5(2)5 = (1)5, (1)5 = (1)5 , (1)5 < (0)5 < (1)5,
and (0)5 = 280290 (
2)
5
= (
1)
5
, (
1)
5
= (
0)
5
,
(
1)
5
< (
0)
5
where (
1)
5
, (
1)
5
are defined respectively
457
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
280 (1)5(28)5 28 () 280 (1)5 where ()5 is defined
458
1
(5)5 280 (1)5(28)5 29() 1(2)5280 (1)5 459460
(30)5280
(
1)5
(
1)5
(
28 )
5
(
2)5
(1)5(28 )5
(2)5
+
300
(2)5
30
(30)5
280(
2)5(
1)5
(30
)5
(1)5
(30
)5
+300
(30
)5
461
280 (1)5 28 () 280 (1)5+(28)5 4621
(1)5 280 (1)5 28 () 1(2)5 280 (1)5+(28 )5 463(30 )5280
(1)5(1)5(30 )5 (1)5 (30 )5+ 300 (30 )5 30() (30)5280
(
2)5
(
1)
5+(
28 )5+(
2)5
(1)5+(28)5
(2)5
+
300
(2)5
464
Definition of(1)5, (2)5, (1)5, (2)5:-Where (1)5 = (28)5(2)5 (28 )5
465
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
28/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2269 | Page
(2)5 = (30)5 (30)5(1)5 = (28)5(2)5 (28 )5
(
2)
5 = (
30 )5
(
30 )
5Behavior of the solutionsIf we denote and define
Definition of (1)6 , (2)6 , (1)6 , (2)6 :(j) (1)6 , (2)6 , (1)6 , (2)6 four constants satisfying(2)6 (32 )6 + (33 )6 (32 )633 , + (33 )633 , (1)6(2)6 (32 )6 + (33 )6 (32 )635, (33 )635, (1)6
466
Definition of (
1 )
6
, (
2)
6
, (
1)
6
, (
2)
6
,
6
,
6
:
(k) By (1)6 > 0 , (2)6 < 0 and respectively (1)6 > 0 , (2)6 < 0 the roots of the equations(33)662 + (1)66 (32)6 = 0and (33)662 + (1)66 (32)6 = 0 and
467
Definition of (1 )6, , (2)6, (1)6, (2)6 :By (1)6 > 0 , (2)6 < 0 and respectively (1)6 > 0 , (2)6 < 0 the
roots of the equations (33)662 + (2)66 (32)6 = 0and (33)662 + (2)66 (32)6 = 0
Definition of (
1)
6
, (
2)
6
, (
1)
6
, (
2)
6
, (
0 )
6
:-
(l) If we define (1)6 , (2)6 , (1)6, (2)6 by(2)6 = (0)6, (1)6 = (1)6, (0)6 < (1)6(2)6 = (1)6, (1)6 = (6 )6 , (1 )6 < (0 )6 < (1)6,and (0 )6 = 320330
( 2)6 = (1)6, (1)6 = (0 )6, (1 )6 < (0)6
468
470
and analogously
(2)6 = (0)6, (1)6 = (1)6, (0)6 < (1)6(2)6 = (1)6, (1)6 = (1)6 , (1)6 < (0)6 < (1)6,
and (0)6 = 320330 ( 2)6 = (1)6, (1)6 = (0)6, (1)6 < (0)6 where (1)6, (1)6
are defined respectively
471
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
320
(
1)
6
(
32)
6
32 () 320
(
1)
6
where ()6 is defined
472
1
(1)6 320 (1)6(32)6 33() 1(2)6 320 (1)6 473
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
29/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2270 | Page
(34)6320(1)6(1)6(32 )6(2)6 (1)6(32 )6 (2)6 + 340 (2)6 34 (34)6320(2)6(1)6(34)6(1)6(34)6+340(34)6
474
320
(
1)
6
32(
)
320
(
1)
6
+(
32)
6
475
1
(1)6 320 (1)6 32 () 1(2)6 320 (1)6+(32 )6 476(34 )6320
(1)6(1)6(34 )6 (1)6 (34 )6+ 340 (34 )6 34() (34)6320
(2)6(1)6+(32 )6+(2)6 (1)6+(32)6 (2)6 + 340 (2)6 477
Definition of(1)6, (2)6, (1)6, (2)6:-Where (
1)
6
= (
32)
6
(
2)
6
(
32
)
6
(2)6 = (34)6 (34)6(1)6 = (32)6(2)6 (32 )6(2)6 = (34 )6 (34 )6
478
479Proof : From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain1 = (13)1 (13 )1 (14 )1 + (13 )114 , (14 )114 , 1 (14)11Definition of1 :- 1 = 1314
It follows
(14)112 + (2)11 (13)1 1 (14)112 + (1)11 (13)1From which one obtains
Definition of(1)1 , (0 )1 :-(a) For 0 < (0 )1 = 130140 < (1)1 < (1 )1 1() (1)1+()1(2)1 141(1)1(0)1
1+()1 141(1)1(0)1 , ()1 = (1)1(0)1(0)1(2)1 it follows (0)1 1() (1)1
480
481
In the same manner , we get
1() (1)1+()1(2)1 141(1)1(2)11+()1 141(1)1(2)1 , ()1 = (1)1(0)1(0)1(2)1 From which we deduce (0)1 1() (1)1
482
(b) If 0 < (1)1 < (0)1 = 130140 < (1 )1 we find like in the previous case,(1 )1 (1)1+1(2)1 141(1)1(2)1
1+1 141(1)1(2)1 1 (1)1+1(2)1 141(1)1(2)1
1+1 141(1)1(2)1 (1)1
483
(c) If 0 < (1)1 (1)1 (0)1 = 130
140 , we obtain(1)1 1 (1)1+1(2)1 141(1)1(2)1
1+1 141(1)1(2)1 (0)1484
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
30/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2271 | Page
And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 1 :-(2)1 1 (1)1, 1 = 1314
In a completely analogous way, we obtain
Definition of
1
:-
(2)1 1 (1)1, 1 = 13
14 Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL E486QUATIONS we get easily the result stated in thetheorem.Particular case :
If(13 )1 = (14 )1, (1)1 = (2)1 and in this case (1)1 = (1)1 if in addition (0)1 = (1 )1then 1 = (0)1 and as a consequence 13 () = (0)114() this also defines (0)1 for the special caseAnalogously if (13 )1 = (14 )1, (1)1 = (2)1 and then(1)1 =(1)1if in addition (0)1 = (1)1 then 13 () = (0)114 () This is an important consequenceof the relation between (1 )1 and (1)1 , and definition of(0)1.
485
486we obtain
d
2
dt = (16)2
(16 )2
(17 )2
+ (16 )2
T17 , t (17 )2
T17 , t2
(17)2
2
487
Definition of2 :- 2 = G16G17 488It follows(17)222 + (2)22 (16)2 d2dt (17)222 + (1)22 (16)2
489
From which one obtains
Definition of(1)2 , (0 )2 :-(d) For 0 < (0)2 = G160G170 < (1)2 < (1)2
2(
)
(1)2+(C)2(2)2 172(1)2(0)2
1+(C)
2
172(1)2(0)2 , (C)2 = (1)
2(0)2(
0)2
(
2)2
it follows (0)2 2() (1)2
490
In the same manner , we get2() (1)2+(C)2(2)2 172(1)2(2)21+(C)2 172(1)2(2)2 , (C)2 = (1)2(0)2(0)2(2)2
491
From which we deduce (0)2 2() (1)2 492(e) If 0 < (1)2 < (0)2 = G160G170 < (1)2 we find like in the previous case,(1)2 (1)2+C2(2)2 172(1)2(2)2
1+C2 172(1)2(2)2 2 (1)2+C2(2)2 172(1)2(2)2
1+C2 172(1)2(2)2 (1)2
493
(f) If 0 < (1)2
(1)2
(0 )2
=G16
0
G170 , we obtain
(1)2 2 (1)2+C2(2)2 172(1)2(2)21+C2 172(1)2(2)2 (0 )2
And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
494
Definition of 2 :-(2)2 2 (1)2, 2 = 1617
495
In a completely analogous way, we obtain
Definition of 2 :-(
2)
2
2
(
1)
2,
2
=
16
17
496
. 497Particular case :
If(16 )2 = (17 )2, (1)2 = (2)2 and in this case (1)2 = (1)2 if in addition (0)2 = (1)2then 2 = (0)2 and as a consequence 16 () = (0)217()
498
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
31/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2272 | Page
Analogously if (16 )2 = (17 )2, (1)2 = (2)2 and then(1)2 =(1)2if in addition (0)2 = (1)2 then 16 () = (0)217 () This is an important consequenceof the relation between (1 )2 and (1)2
499
From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain3
= (
20)
3
(
20
)
3
(
21
)
3
+ (
20
)
3
21 ,
(
21
)
3
21 ,
3
(
21)
3
3
500
Definition of3 :- 3 = 2021 It follows(21)332 + (2)33 (20)3 3 (21)332 + (1)33 (20)3501
From which one obtains
(a) For 0 < (0)3 = 200210 < (1)3 < (1)33() (1)3+()3(2)3 213(1)3(0)3
1+()3 213(1)3(0)3 , ()3 = (1)3(0)3(0)3(2)3 it follows (
0)
3
3
(
)
(
1)
3
502
In the same manner , we get3() (1)3+()3(2)3 213(1)3(2)31+()3 213(1)3(2)3 , ()3 = (1)3(0)3(0)3(2)3
Definition of(1)3 :-From which we deduce (0)3 3() (1)3
503
(b) If 0 < (1)3 < (0)3 = 200210 < (1 )3 we find like in the previous case,(1)3 (1)3+3(2)3 213(1)3(2)3
1+3 213(1)3(2)3 3 (
1)3+
3(
2)3
213(1)3(2)3
1+3 213
(1)3
(2)3
(
1)
3
504
(c) If 0 < (1)3 (1)3 (0)3 = 200210 , we obtain(1)3 3 (1)3+3(2)3 213(1)3(2)3
1+3 213(1)3(2)3 (0)3And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 3 :-(2)3 3 (1)3, 3 = 2021 In a completely analogous way, we obtain
Definition of
3
:-
(2)3 3 (1)3, 3 = 20
21 Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.Particular case :
If(20 )3 = (21 )3, (1)3 = (2)3 and in this case (1 )3 = (1)3 if in addition (0)3 = (1)3then 3 = (0)3 and as a consequence 20 () = (0)321()Analogously if (20 )3 = (21 )3, (1)3 = (2)3 and then(1)3 =(1)3if in addition (0)3 = (1)3 then 20 () = (0)321 () This is an important consequenceof the relation between (1 )3 and (1)3
505
506
: From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain
4
= (24)4
(24 )4
(25 )4
+ (24 )4
25 , (25 )4
25 , 4
(25)4
4
507
508
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
32/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2273 | Page
Definition of4 :- 4 = 2425 It follows(25)442 + (2)44 (24)4 4 (25)442 + (4)44 (24)4
From which one obtains
Definition of(1)4 , (0 )4 :-(d) For 0 < (0 )4 = 240250 < (1)4 < (1 )4 4 (1)4+4(2)4 254(1)4(0)4
4+4 254(1)4(0)4 , 4 = (1)4(0)4(0)4(2)4 it follows (0)4 4() (1)4In the same manner , we get
4 (1)4+4(2)4 254(1)4(2)44+4 254(1)4(2)4 , ()4 = (1)4(0)4(0)4(2)4
From which we deduce (0 )4 4() (1 )4
509
(e) If 0 < (1)4 < (0)4 = 240250 < (1 )4 we find like in the previous case,(1 )4 (1)4+4(2)4 254(1)4(2)4
1+4 254(1)4(2)4 4 (1)4+4(2)4 25
4
(1)4
(2)4
1+4 254(1)4(2)4 (1)4
510
511
(f) If 0 < (1)4 (1)4 (0)4 = 240250 , we obtain(1)4 4 (1)4+4(2)4 254(1)4(2)4
1+4 254(1)4(2)4 (0)4And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 4 :-(2)4 4 (1)4, 4 = 2425 In a completely analogous way, we obtainDefinition of 4 :-(2)4 4 (1)4, 4 = 2425 Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem.
Particular case :
If(
24)
4
= (
25)
4
,
(
1)
4
= (
2)
4
and in this case (
1)
4
= (
1)
4
if in addition (
0)
4
= (
1)
4
then 4 = (0)4 and as a consequence 24 () = (0)425()this also defines (0)4 for the specialcase .Analogously if (24 )4 = (25 )4, (1)4 = (2)4 and then
512
513
7/31/2019 Bo 2422422286
33/45
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER)www.ijmer.com Vol.2, Issue.4, July-Aug. 2012 pp-2242-2286 ISSN: 2249-6645
www.ijmer.com 2274 | Page
(1)4 =(4)4if in addition (0)4 = (1)4 then 24 () = (0)425() This is an important consequenceof the relation between (1 )4 and (1)4 ,and definition of(0)4.
514From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain
5
= (
28)
5
(
28 )5
(
29 )5 + (
28 )5
29 ,
(
29 )5
29,
5
(
29)
5
5
Definition of5 :- 5 = 2829 It follows(29)552 + (2)55 (28)5 5 (29)552 + (1)55 (28)5From which one obtains
Definition of(
1)
5
, (
0 )
5
:-
(g) For 0 < (0 )5 = 280290 < (1)5 < (1 )5 5() (1)5+()5(2)5 295(1)5(0)5
5+()5 295(1)5(0)5 , ()5 = (1)5(0)5(0)5(2)5 it follows (0)5 5() (1)5
515
In the same manner , we get
5
() (
1)
5
+(
)
5
(
2)
5
29
5
(
1)5
(
2)5
5+()5 295(1)5(2)5 , ()5
=(
1)
5
(
0)
5
(0)5(2)5 From which we deduce (0 )5 5() (5)5
516
(h) If 0 < (1)5 < (0)5 = 280290 < (1 )5 we find like in the previous case,(1 )5 (1)5+5(2)5 295(1)5(2)5
1+5 295(1)5(2)5 5 (1)5+5(2)5 295(1)5(2)5
1+
5
29
5
(
1)
5
(
2)
5
(
1)
5
517
(i) If 0 < (1)5 (1)5 (0)5 = 280290 , we obtain(1)5 5 (1)5+5(2)5 295(1)5(2)5
1+5 295(1)5(2)5 (0)5And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have
Definition of 5 :-(2