+ All Categories
Home > Documents > C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: ersundt
View: 224 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 23

Transcript
  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    1/23

    THE CORNERSTONE SEMINARY

    C. S. LEWIS: THEOLOGIAN OF ETERNAL HOPE

    A PAPER PRESENTED TO DR. MIKE CANHAMIN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT

    OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CH603

    BY ERIC SUNDT

    VALLEJO, CALIFORNIAMAY 14, 2013

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    2/23

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

    DEFINING A LEGACY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

    A LIFE OVERCOME BY JOY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

    DEFINING ETERNAL HOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    LIFE-ALTERING HOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

    Hope's Impact on Joy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

    Hope's Impact on Love . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    Hope's Impact on Suffering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

    Hope's Impact on Anthropology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    Hope's Impact on Choices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    THE BENEFITS OF A VIBRANT THEOLOGY OF HOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    i

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    3/23

    Preface

    I had suspected for some years that a paper of this sort should be written. Particularly

    when I completed reading the various works of C.S. Lewis that I possessed back in the winter of

    2011, I was regularly struck with the thought of how much beneficial insight he had regarding

    eternity, and how hopeful his theology was. So this paper is, for me, the opportunity to complete

    a project that I've looked forward to for a while. Even so, I did not anticipate just how easy it

    would be to review what he wrote and put together this paper.

    I must say that I have thoroughly enjoyed writing this paper. It has been a delight to read

    the many insightful things that Lewis had to say about eternity and about the hope of Christians

    for the future. His writing is very consistent with his theory; it is very easy to see how his ideas

    impacted the way he wrote. In the course of this reflection, I found myself drawn at multiple

    times to worship God, who has given this hope to His people.

    Considering the subject matter and all that could be said about it, this paper probably

    deserves to be ten times longer than it is. There is no way that I can exhaust in 20 pages the

    wealth of what C.S. Lewis wrote with specific focus on what he said about eternity and hope.

    Additionally, I was surprised with how little material I could find that had been written on this

    topic. As such, the reader will find that this paper is completely first-hand interaction with the

    writings of Lewis. In the scope of my admittedly-limited research, I simply could not find

    anyone else to provide extra comment to interact with along these lines. Thus, I submit this paper

    to any who might read it as an introductory work. Perhaps I, or others, can find time in the future

    to develop the strains of thought further.

    ii

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    4/23

    DEFINING A LEGACY

    Whenever examining a figure in church history, it is always helpful to seek to summarize

    key points that can be learned from his or her life. When this analysis turns to Clive Staples

    Lewis, the common assessment is that his primary contribution is in the realm of apologetics.

    Indeed, his defense of Christianity was strong, and much can be learned from insights that he had

    concerning the Christian faith and how it correlates to the world we observe. His acumen for

    taking abstract concepts and making them easier to understand and for seeing truth clearly in

    tough issues has been duly noted. However, there is another aspect of his theology that has often

    been overlooked and is so pervasive for Lewis that it appears even in his apologetics; namely,

    Lewis's theology of eternal hope. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate from Lewis's writings

    that a robust theology of eternal hope is in fact Lewis's most substantial and lasting contribution

    to Christian theology, and is one of the key threads that tied all of his thought together.

    Some might contend instead for Joy (a technical term for Lewis) as this central thought,

    and it certainly is a key factor. The place of Joy will be seen in the first section of this paper,

    which provides a brief biography of Lewis from the content of his autobiography Surprised by

    Joy, as well as his fictional novelPilgrim's Regress (based generally on his own life). The second

    section will set forth Lewis's theology of eternal hope from several of his writings to gain an

    overall understanding of what he meant. The third section will again look at many of his writings

    to show how this theology impacted many realms of life in his thought. Finally, the conclusion

    will seek to summarize these gleanings for the purpose of learning from Lewis and tracing out

    ways in which his theology of eternal hope can impact the lives of Christians today.

    1

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    5/23

    2

    A LIFE OVERCOME BY JOY1

    C.S. Lewis was born in 1898, the youngest of two children (both boys) born to parents

    who were both bookish, but shared contrasting temperaments (his father more emotional and

    his mother more tranquil) that led him to distrust emotion from an early age (SJ 3-4). His

    imagination manifested itself while he was young, as he and his brother would often draw

    pictures and create worlds (SJ 6). His early aesthetic experiences (including these imagined

    worlds) were of a romantic nature, rather than being based on formal beauty, and they were

    rare. One key example was a time when his brother made a miniature forest out of moss, twigs,

    and flowers on top of the lid to a biscuit tin, which was Lewis's first awareness of beauty, such

    that it permanently impacted his imagination of Paradise (SJ 7). Regarding religion, there was

    some influence in his early life, but it did not really affect him directly (SJ 7). Though these

    years of childhood contained more of a settled happiness than later years of boyhood, Lewis

    did not recall them with as much nostalgia as the later years, saying, It is not settled happiness

    but momentary joy that glorifies the past (SJ 8).

    In his seventh year, his family moved to a new house, which came to be a defining

    characteristic of his childhood, for this house had distinct characteristics that shaped him, one of

    which was endless books that he was free to read to his heart's delight (SJ 10). His brother was

    sent off to boarding school and his life became increasingly one of solitude to read and write,

    solitude that was readily available in the large house and its grounds. He used one of the attics as

    his study and wrote his first stories (mostly of Animal-Land) there, including historical

    back-stories and illustrations, even including maps (SJ 11-13). During this time as he was living

    almost entirely in imagination (SJ 15), three events proved particularly significant.

    1 In order to refrain from excessive footnotes, this section will contain in-line references to title and page number.

    SJ will be used to indicate C.S. Lewis, Suprised by Joy (Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 1955). PR will be used to

    indicate C.S. Lewis, The Pilgrim's Regress (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991).

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    6/23

    3

    The first of these events was a specific time when he remembered the event of his brother

    bringing the toy garden into the room, and it filled him with pangs of Joy, a glimpse of pure

    desire. The second event that brought this Joy was the reading of Beatrix Potter's Squirrel

    Nutkin, which captured his attention and brought out similar pangs of desire. The third

    occurrence was when he was reading poetry and came across a particularly touching line that

    carried his imagination away to desires beyond the reading (SJ 16-17). Lewis saw the main story

    of his life as being about the shared experience of these three occurrences. He described the

    common quality of the three as being, an unsatisfied desire which is itself more desirable than

    any other satisfaction. I call it Joy, which is here a technical term and must be sharply

    distinguished both from Happiness and from Pleasure (SJ 17-18).

    After this time, things changed dramatically for Lewis. His mother died, which took away

    his sense of general stability and peace (SJ 21), and then he started going to boarding school in

    1908, which he said was intellectually a waste, but it did prepare him for the Christian life by

    teaching him to live with hope, in this case hope of the end of the school year (SJ 22, 34-36). A

    few years later, he moved on to an older school (Wyvern), where he ceased to be a Christian in

    his living as he followed pessimism and misguided religious practice to the indulgence of sexual

    appetite and overall paganism (SJ 58-70).

    During this time of his boyhood, the Joy he previously experienced had vanished from

    his life, but it returned all of a sudden when he came into contact with art based on the music of

    Wagner, and the memory and renewed experience of Joy filled him with insistent desire that he

    would have this Joy yet again (SJ 72-73). This connection to Wagner quickly to listening to

    Wagner's music, and then pursuing Norse mythology as a whole, which regularly provided the

    pangs of Joy he so desired. This pursuit as a whole produced a direct love of nature that he

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    7/23

    4

    previously did not have. He became more and more knowledgeable of Norse myth, and he

    suggested perhaps this worship was meant to prepare him for his later return to Christianity

    and real faith. At this point, Lewis's life became divided between his internal life of pursuing Joy

    and his external life of dealing with the world. The two often were disconnected, but this tension

    came to define him (SJ 76-78). Once again, Joy is the theme of his story.

    As the years passed, he became an intellectual prig (SJ 100) who came to be angry at

    God for not existing (SJ 115). And though he came to experience as much happiness as is ever

    to be reached on earth (SJ 147), he also discovered that this happiness, this Joy, was changing

    and wasn't the same anymore (SJ 165). As a result, he was determined to recover the old

    feelings, and he did this in a way that he could later see as encompassing two key errors. First of

    all, he was seeking the thrill itself, rather than the object of pursuit that created the thrill. Second,

    he was trying to produce this state of mind (the thrill) on his own, as if he could just create it on-

    demand (SJ 166-168). Through this time, he came to recognize clearly that the desire that created

    this Joy was not fulfilled by usual pleasures like sex or magic or other things (SJ 168-170, 177).

    There eventually came a day when he picked up a book by George MacDonald, the

    reading of which brought him to a fresh experience of Joy unlike those in the past: Up till now

    each visitation of Joy had left the common world momentarily a desert... But now I saw the

    bright shadow coming out of the book into the real world and resting there, transforming all

    common things and yet itself unchanged (SJ 179, 181). This was the start of his interaction with

    Christians, which was later followed by reading G.K. Chesterton, and by a relationship with a

    fellow solider, Johnson, who was a strong Christian and showed Lewis the value of virtues (SJ

    190-192). At the same time, other friends of his began to challenge points of his thinking and he

    came to accept the Absolute as a self-aware reality, though not yet as God (SJ 199-210).

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    8/23

    5

    Lewis soon came to another realization that he refers to as the ludicrous contradiction

    between my theory of life and my experience as a reader (SJ 213): all of the writers that he

    found sensible possessed the same regrettable quality their Christianity. He attempted to

    explain away this fact at the time,2 but this effort would not be able to last long (SJ 212-216).

    While reading theHippolytus of Euripedes, Lewis was overcome, his heart at once broken and

    exalted as it had never been since the old days at Bookham (SJ 217).

    The longing of Joy was back and he would never leave it again. A new philosophy of

    enjoyment was presented to him and it re-oriented his thinking such that he realized the

    foolishness of his previous pursuit of Joy for its own end (SJ 217-220). Joy itself, considered

    simply as an event in my own mind, turned out to be of no value at all. All the value lay in that of

    which Joy was the desiring. And that object, quite clearly, was no state of my own mind or body

    at all (SJ 220). He had come to recognize that what he really wanted was the object that his

    desire of Joy had been seeking all along. As this conclusion came to impact his philosophical

    thought and worldview, he came to a conversion to Theism, pure and simple. He did not yet

    recognize any connection between God and Joy, or hold a belief in the future life (SJ 220-230).

    This status did not last. After a few developments, Lewis came to recognize that Jesus

    Christ is the Son of God. He recognized the fulfillment of Joy in God Himself (SJ 230-238). The

    subject of Joy lost nearly all interest after he became a Christian, because he recognized that

    the importance was not found in Joy, but in Joy's object (SJ 238). When Lewis wrotePilgrim's

    Regress, he included there this pursuit of Joy and eventual recognition of Joy's proper place. The

    main character, John, has an early experience of a sweetness and a pang so piercing that he

    instantly forgot other things (PR 8). The rest of the story follows John's rational pursuit of this

    2 He later commented, I thought... that Christianity itself was very sensible 'apart from its Christianity' (SJ 223).

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    9/23

    6

    experience, this pang, through many different philosophies and methods, until John is eventually

    converted to Christianity. Lewis reflects on this in the afterword to the book, and describes again

    the process in his past of testing all possible sources of this Joy and finding them wanting, then

    discovering that there is One who is the object of Joy who is not yet fully given, but will be (PR

    202-205). So this is the centrality of Joy in Lewis's life as a motivator, but not the goal. Keeping

    this in mind, Lewis's theology of eternal hope easily finds its place.

    DEFINING ETERNAL HOPE

    There are many reasons why the modern Christian and even the moderntheologian may hesitate to give to the doctrine of Christs Second Coming that

    emphasis which was usually laid on it by our ancestors. Yet it seems to me

    impossible to retain in any recognisable3form our belief in the Divinity of Christand the truth of the Christian revelation while abandoning, or even persistently

    neglecting, the promised, and threatened, Return. - C.S. Lewis 4

    Especially when considering quotes like the above, it seems impossible to overstate the

    importance of eternity in Lewis's thinking. His core theology of hope receives its most direct

    treatment in the chapter called Hope inMere Christianity. As a brief summary (to be treated

    again later) of the importance and effect of hope, he said, Hope is one of the Theological

    virtues... the Christians who did the most for the present world were just those who thought most

    of the next.5Lewis went on to discuss the fact that many seem not to want 'Heaven' at all;

    however, he believed that all people possessed an inner longing that could not be fulfilled in this

    world: The longings which arise in us when we first fall in love, or first think of some foreign

    country, or first take up some subject that excites us, are longings which no marriage, no travel,

    no learning, can really satisfy.6 He then stated three ways to react to this unfulfilled longing.

    3 In order to avoid greatly distracting from Lewis's language, various features and spellings of British English will

    be preserved in their original form with the note [sic].

    4 C.S. Lewis, The World's Last Night: And Other Essays, Kindle Edition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt,

    2002), Kindle Locations 925-928.

    5 C.S. Lewis,Mere Christianity (New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), 134.

    6 Ibid., 135.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    10/23

    7

    The first way is the fool's way, which is to blame the objects in which the fulfillment is

    sought. Endless options are tried to see which one will be just right to complete the longing,

    which results in the person being always disappointed.7 The second way is that of the

    disillusioned sensible man who quickly concludes that the whole pursuit is a pointless

    delusion, and abandons it altogether. He learns to expect less of life and settles in well to the life

    he has.8 The third way is the way of the Christian, which is Lewis's own perspective: Creatures

    are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists...if I find in myself a desire

    which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made

    for another world.9 This, in its simplest form, is a statement of Lewis's theology of hope. The

    hope that he rejoiced in is the hope that all human experience will find its completion in eternity,

    including all that is implied there regarding knowing and experiencing God, being in 'Heaven,'

    judgment and reward, the resurrected body, and the nature of life itself.

    In speaking of eternity, Lewis was not talking merely about the future in this life. He

    delineated this in chapter 15 ofThe Screwtape Letters, a fictional book of letters written from an

    older demon (Screwtape) to provide instruction to a younger demon (Wormwood). The demon,

    referring to God as the 'enemy,' says the following about eternity, the present, and the future:

    Our Enemy destines them to eternity. He therefore, I believe, wants them to attend

    chiefly to two things, to eternity itself and to that point of time which they call the

    present either meditating on their eternal union with, or separation from,Himself, or else obeying the present voice of conscience, bearing the present

    cross, receiving the present grace, giving thanks for the present pleasure. Our

    business is to get them away from the eternal and from the Present ... the Futureis, of all things, the leastlike eternity. It is the most completely temporal part of

    time for the Past is frozen and no longer flows, and the Present is all lit up with

    eternal rays Hence nearly all vices are rooted in the Future. Gratitude looks tothe Past and love to the Present; fear, avarice, lust, and ambition look ahead ... He

    does not want men to give the Future their hearts, to place their treasure in it. We

    7 Ibid., 135-136.

    8 Ibid., 136.

    9 Ibid., 136-137.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    11/23

    8

    do We want a whole race perpetually in pursuit of the rainbow's end, never

    honest, nor kind, nor happy now, but always using as mere fuel wherewith to heapthe altar of the Future every real gift which is offered them in the Present. 10

    Later in the book, Lewis says that God has guarded humans from the danger of feeling at home

    anywhere else than His eternal world, and speaks of the inveterate appetite that humans have

    for Heaven.11 Thus, for Lewis, eternity is meant ultimately to fulfill longing, but also impact the

    present and kill false hopes of the merely temporal future.

    Lewis also was not talking about the value or 'hope' of mere immortality. He praised the

    nature of God's progressive revelation, training men to love Him for Himself before later

    revealing the realities of immortality and eternity. Lewis believed that a religion that started with

    the focus on immortality was doomed, because immortality would serve as a bribe to men to

    fulfill their selfishness. He said that the essence of religion is the thirst for an end higher than

    natural ends; the finite self's desire for, and and acquiescence in, and self-rejection in favor of, an

    object wholly good and wholly good for it.12The point is God Himself knowing Him and

    finding all joy fulfilled by Him. Eternal life is given, as it were, as a reinforcement of this point.

    It is the unending gift of a good God who gives us Himself forever.

    In Lewis's theology, eternity contains the realm of what is truly real; this life has only the

    shadows that point forward. One way this is seen is in his perspective of the miracles and life of

    Jesus, which were the firstfruits of that cosmic summer which is presently coming on. A man

    should speak of Christ's resurrection not merely as a fact, but as a direct and emotive symbol of

    hope, because he knows what is coming. The Son of Man is calling men out of the 'cosmic

    winter' through the spring and into the 'high midsummer pomps.'13

    10 C.S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters (New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1980), 67-70.

    11 Ibid., 132-133.

    12 C.S. Lewis, The Grand Miracle (New York: Ballantine Books, 1970), 88.

    13 Ibid., 62.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    12/23

    9

    This realness is also seen (and most prominently seen) in the novels Lewis wrote. Not

    only miracles, but all of creation is a precursor, a foreshadowing of the reality to come. In The

    Silver Chair, in the Narnia Series, Lewis pictured Caspian (who had died in Narnia) as having a

    new body that was no longer fit for Narnia because it was now remade for the reality of Aslan's

    country.14The Great Divorce (a separate work about Heaven) picks up on similar concepts

    during its extended and imaginative look at Heaven. Here Lewis pictures a Heaven that is so

    much more real that a flower is hard like diamond and a leaf is as heavy as a sack of coal.

    Earthly visitors look like ghosts, because the substance of Heaven is so much solider than things

    in our country that men were ghosts by comparison.15 Everything in Heaven is ageless and full

    of life,16 and Heaven is reality itself. All that is fully real is Heavenly. For all that can be shaken

    will be shaken and only the unshakeable remains.17

    The heights of imaginative exploration are reached in the Narnia series's The Last Battle,

    when Aslan comes to bring an end to Narnia and take his followers into eternity in Aslan's

    country. Before this occurrence, the character Jill suggests that it would be wonderful if Narnia

    continued forever. The response is that all worlds draw to an end, except Aslan's own country.18

    In Aslan's country, his followers are treated to food beyond compare: If you had once eaten that

    fruit, all the nicest things in this world would taste like medicines after it.19 The end of Narnia

    does come shortly after this, and the reader is caught up in the strains of further up and further

    in as Aslan's followers continually follow him further and deeper into his land, a land which

    bears remarkable similarity to the Narnia that they left behind, but which is deeper and more

    14 C.S. Lewis, The Silver Chair(New York: HarperTrophy, 1981), 253-254.

    15 C.S. Lewis, The Great Divorce (New York: HarperOne, 1973), 21.

    16 Ibid., 24.

    17 Ibid., 70-71.

    18 C.S. Lewis, The Last Battle (New York: HarperTrophy, 1984), 110-111.

    19 Ibid., 172.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    13/23

    10

    meaningful.20 In fact, what they see is the real Narnia, for the Narnia they left behind was just a

    shadow, as all of the temporary lands are merely shadows of real places that exist in Aslan's

    country. Aslan's real world preserves all that was important in the shadowlands and the

    experience is like waking up from a dream. It is home at last!21 The process of going further up

    and further in continues, faster and faster, and at last they come to the gates through which all

    their friends, and Aslan himself, are waiting to welcome them. Aslan summarizes the situation

    when he says, The term is over: the holidays have begun. The dream is ended: this is the

    morning.

    22

    They have moved from this life, which is only the cover page, on into the Great

    Story which no one on earth has read: which goes on forever: in which every chapter is better

    than the one before.23

    This, then, is the hope that C.S. Lewis envisions in his theology of eternity. The promise

    of eternal bliss with God is a joy worthy grasping at all moments that impacts all of life. Having

    summarized his theology all-too-briefly, it now remains to observe just how this joy-fulfilling

    hope impacts life as a whole for Lewis.

    LIFE-ALTERING HOPE

    Hope's Impact on Joy

    Perhaps the most easily-seen impact of eternal hope is upon the presence and pursuit of

    Joy. Lewis's conclusion, that Joy is ultimately fulfilled only by eternity and God Himself, has

    already been noted. The impact of this theology for daily life follows clearly from the claim. In

    an essay called The Weight of Glory, Lewis said the following about man's desires for joy:

    If there lurks in most modern minds the notion that to desire our own good andearnestly to hope for the enjoyment of it is a bad thing, I submit that this notion

    20 Ibid., 194-213.

    21 Ibid., 211-213.

    22 Ibid., 228.

    23 Ibid., 228.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    14/23

    11

    has crept in from Kant and the Stoics and is no part of the Christian faith. Indeed,

    if we consider the unblushing promises of reward and the staggering nature of therewards promised in the Gospels, it would seem that Our Lord finds our desires

    not too strong, but too weak. We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about withdrink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us, like an ignorant childwho wants to go on making mud pies in a slum because he cannot imagine what is

    meant by the offer of a holiday at the sea. We are far too easily pleased.24

    For Lewis, there was no question whether joy should be pursued: it should. The question is not

    if but how and where it should be pursued. Lewis recognized that there were many false

    sources of joy, so the practical outflow of this connection between hope and joy was to pursue

    the joy in the right object, namely God Himself and His Heaven. If a transtemporal, transfinite

    good is our real destiny, then any other good on which our desire fixes must be in some degree

    fallacious, must bear at best only a symbolical relation to what will truly satisfy.25

    Lest this perspective seem a killjoy against any other pleasures, Lewis stated clearly that

    other joys were good; however, they had definite limits:

    The books or music in which we thought the beauty was located will betray us ifwe trust to them; it was not in them, it only came through them, and what came

    through them was longing. These things the beauty, the memory of our own past

    are good images of what we really desire; but if they are mistaken for the thingitself, they turn into dumb idols, breaking the hearts of their worshippers. For they

    are not the thing itself; they are only the scent of a flower we have not found, the

    echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have never yetvisited.26

    The recognition that eternal hope is the fulfillment of joy impacts present life by altering one's

    gaze to only those things that can truly satisfy. And a man will not lose his pleasures by

    abandoning earth for Heaven: The kernel of what he was really seeking even in his most

    depraved wishes will be there, beyond expectation, waiting for him in 'the High Countries.'27

    24 C.S. Lewis, The Weight of Glory (New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), 26.

    25 Ibid., 29.

    26 Ibid., 30-31.

    27 Lewis, The Great Divorce, ix.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    15/23

    12

    Lewis protrayed this concept in The Great Divorce with a man who had a dragon of lust that,

    once it was killed in Heaven, became instead a glorious stallion.28

    Hope's Impact on Love

    Eternal hope also impacts Lewis's theology of love. In The Four Loves, Lewis provided

    his most extended treatment of the topic, dealing with 'affection,' 'friendship,' 'eros,' and 'charity.'

    Before getting into each of these, he dealt with what he called Need-loves, which are

    essentially the result in our desires of a genuine need that we have, whether it be a need for food

    or companionship, or anything else. The love is brought about because of the need. And not all

    Need-love is a bad thing, for God specifically addresses our Need-love and invites us to come to

    Him for what we need.29Indeed, compared to other Need-loves, our Need-love for God is in a

    different position because our need of Him can never end either in this world or in any other.30

    Friendship also will be fulfilled, not eliminated, in eternity. Friendship increases our love for

    each other and for God and will do so even in Heaven, for every soul, seeing Him in her own

    way, doubtless communicates that unique vision to all the rest. 31

    After discussing the 'natural loves' (affection, friendship, and eros), Lewis concluded that,

    The natural loves are not self-sufficient. Something else, at first vaguely described as 'decency

    and common sense,' but later revealed as goodness, and finally as the whole Christian life in one

    particular relation, must come to the help of the mere feeling if the feeling is to be kept sweet.32

    The natural loves cannot maintain themselves, and certainly cannot take the place of God. 33 They

    must be converted to charity, to Christ-like love, because natural loves can hope for eternity

    28 Ibid., 106-114.

    29 C.S. Lewis, The Four Loves (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1988), 4.

    30 Ibid., 15.

    31 Ibid., 62.

    32 Ibid., 116.

    33 Ibid., 118.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    16/23

    13

    only in so far as they have allowed themselves to be taken into the eternity of Charity... the only

    eternal element is the transforming presence of Love Himself.34 Thus, the completion of all

    human love is the work of Christ to work out His own love in and through His people.

    The object of our love is also changed in light of eternity. All of our love in this life is

    meant to point us beyond to the love of God Himself, who is the truest object for such affection.

    It is only be being like God that our human beloveds can excite our love, for they are the portrait

    of which He is the Original; they are the rivulets for which He is the fountain; they are lovable

    creatures, but he is Love Himself.

    35

    Thus the hope of eternity changes the focus once more; love

    is focused ultimately on God instead of on people, to find it's everlasting completion in Him.

    Hope's Impact on Suffering

    Lewis believed that eternal hope has a very direct impact in the midst of suffering:

    Scripture and tradition habitually put the joys of heaven into the scale against the sufferings of

    earth, and no solution of the problem of pain which does not do so can be called a Christian

    one.36 There is a secret thread, a secret attraction in the things that each person enjoys, and

    all the things that have ever deeply possessed your soul have been but hints of it tantalising

    glimpses, promises never quite fulfilled, echoes that died away just as they caught your ear.37 It

    is in Heaven where this will be fulfilled, with each place in Heaven made specifically for each

    unique person.38

    Lewis believed that God uses suffering in this world to keep us close to Him. The

    security we crave would teach us to rest our hearts in this world and oppose an obstacle to our

    return to God... Our Father refreshes us on the journey with some pleasant inns, but will not

    34 Ibid., 136-137.

    35 Ibid., 139.

    36 C.S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain (New York: HarperOne, 1996), 148.

    37 Ibid., 150-151.

    38 Ibid., 151-152.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    17/23

    14

    encourage us to mistake them for home.39 The Christian's final home is Heaven, where security

    will be forever found in the presence of God. Until that future day comes, suffering serves to

    remind men that all is not yet well and a greater hope is coming.

    How does this function of suffering work and how must it be dealt with? Lewis provided

    an example scenario. Suppose all seems well and he is enjoying life with his friends in a godless

    condition, forgetting the greater reality. Suddenly a pain or a trial comes in and destroys this

    illusion that all is well. The experience can be overwhelming as all that seemed right can

    suddenly appear broken, but then bit by bit, I try to bring myself into the frame of mind that I

    should be in at all times. I remind myself that all these toys were never intended to possess my

    heart, that my true good is in another world and my only real treasure is Christ.40 Years later,

    Lewis experienced perhaps the most difficult such trial he had ever faced when his wife died. In

    a book calledA Grief Observed, Lewis's journals during that time are recorded. They start off

    despondent, hopeless, and even angry at God, but eventually the emotional swells calm as Lewis

    continued to cling to God. Lewis reminded himself that his own conceptions of God need

    correcting at times; that God was to be desired for His own sake, rather than for the sake of

    seeing his beloved again. He reminded himself that the real glory of Heaven is God. 41

    Suffering and hope are necessarily interwoven until eternity comes, for there will always

    be a need on this earth for reminders of what truly matters. And in the face of any suffering, the

    final hope is not that the suffering itself will cease, but that Heaven is coming where all desires

    will be finally met. On that Great Day, Jesus will fulfill all dreams and remove all sorrows. Thus,

    eternal hope is both the goal and solution to suffering, as well as the key method for dealing with

    suffering while it lasts.

    39 Ibid., 116.

    40 Ibid., 107.

    41 C.S. Lewis,A Grief Observed(New York: HarperOne, 1994), 66-68.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    18/23

    15

    Hope's Impact on Anthropology

    One of the most substantial impacts of Lewis's theology of eternal hope concerns how

    believers see other people. His thoughts on this topic must be quoted at length:

    It may be possible for each to think too much of his own potential glory hereafter;

    it is hardly possible for him to think too often or too deeply about that of hisneighbour. The load, or weight, or burden or my neighbour's glory should be laid

    on my back, a load so heavy that only humility can carry it, and the backs of the

    proud will be broken. It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and

    godesses, to remember that the dullest and most uninteresting person you can talkto may one day be a creature which, if you say it now, you would be strongly

    tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at

    all, only in nightmare. All day long we are, in some degree, helping each other toone or other of these destinations. It is in the light of these overwhelming

    possibilities, it is with the awe and the circumspection proper to them, that we

    should conduct all our dealings with one another, all friendships, all loves, allplay, all politics. There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere

    mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilisations these are mortal, and their life is to

    ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with,

    marry, snub, and exploit immortal horrors or everlasting splendours. 42

    It would seem that not much more needs to be said to summarize this. Eternity impacts the nature

    of anthropology man is an eternal being of either horror or beauty. Eternity impacts evangelism

    it is not mere mortals who are being talked to, and the consequences are eternal. Eternity

    impacts daily life on this earth to transform all activities into intentional interactions.

    In addition, the resurrection of Jesus itself carries a vital impact on the perspective of the

    human body, on life, and on hope for the future. Lewis contended that the Resurrection was not

    regarding simply or chiefly as evidence for the immortality of the soul...Immortality simply as

    immortality is irrelevant to the Christian claim...A wholly new mode of being has arisen in the

    universe.43 Lewis held that Jesus is the founder of the New Nature, which results in great hope

    for the future when men clothed in spiritual bodies will join Jesus, who has kept His body also.44

    42 Lewis, The Weight of Glory, 45-46.

    43 C.S. Lewis,Miracles (New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), 236-241.

    44 Ibid., 244-266.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    19/23

    16

    Hope's Impact on Choices

    As a final foray, a few words may be said about the impact for Lewis of eternal hope on

    the choices that are made by men in daily life, and specifically those geared towards doing

    good to the fellow-man. He asserts that it is quite impossible that those who know this truth

    [Christianity] and those who don't should be equally well equipped for leading a good life. He

    then makes a comparison to attempts to help a starving man. Someone without knowledge of

    medical sciences pertinent to the situation might give the starving man a large meal and thereby

    kill him. Similarly, the Christian and non-Christian attempts to do good in the world around them

    are not equal. The materialist holds an evolutionary view of man that sees civilization as

    transcending the men that make it up, and thus might make choices that favor society without

    regard for some individuals who are hurt. By contrast, the Christian believes that all men are

    eternal and will outlast all earthly civilization. Therefore, the Christian will seek to do things that

    promote each man's eternal good.45 The idea of reaching 'a good life' without Christ is based on

    a double error. Firstly, we cannot do it; and secondly, in setting up 'a good life' as our final goal,

    we have missed the very point of our existence.46

    In this connection, the method can be seen by which Lewis thought that Christians live

    better in this world than those who do not share this eternal hope:

    Because our Lord is risen, we know that on one level it is an enemy alreadydisarmed; but because we know that the natural level also is God's creation we

    cannot cease to fight against the death which mars it... because we love something

    else more than this world we love this world better than those who know noother.47

    Eternity impacts choices in the present life because it is the Savior's world that needs help, and

    every moment contains the opportunity to impact eternity.

    45 Lewis, The Grand Miracle, 81-82.

    46 Ibid., 85.

    47 Ibid., 106.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    20/23

    17

    THE BENEFITS OF A VIBRANT THEOLOGY OF HOPE

    In reflecting on this theology, the only appropriate response would seem to be an echo of

    Revelation 22:20, Amen. Come Lord Jesus!48 Lewis's expression of hope in the promises God

    has given for eternity is refreshing, delightful, enlivening, and, indeed, intoxicating at times.

    Reading the narratives that Lewis wrote is itself a practice of the sort of joyful longing that he

    wrote about. There is a real day coming when Jesus will return and set all things right; a day

    when reality will be completely seen, when what is currently hidden will be made visible and the

    shadows will flee. This message should be heralded and proclaimed!

    Perhaps part of what is so attractive and arresting about this theology is the fact that it is

    so unabashedly positive. The gospel can be stated both negatively (Jesus saved you from Hell)

    and positively (Jesus saved you to be with Him forever), and Lewis found a beautiful way of

    expressing the positive statement. Jesus is calling people to eternal joy. He is calling them to

    pursue pleasure, but to pursue it where it can really be fulfilled: in Him. It is this same message

    of hope and fulfilled joy that can be offered to the world today.

    As a brief aside, it is worth noting that at this point of Lewis's theology, there seem to be

    substantial connections forward in Christian history, specifically to John Piper. Piper's theology

    of Christian hedonism, the focus on desiring God, is certainly aided by Lewis's eternal hope.

    Some of the same quotes referenced in this paper from Mere Christianity orThe Weight of Glory

    can be found in Piper's writings as he urges his readers to seek their pleasure in God. Piper seems

    to find Lewis's writing to be a perfect complement to the emphasis of his own ministry.

    This theology of hope needs to be taught and reinforced regularly in Christian circles.

    There is often much emphasis placed on the cross and all that Jesus did to provide payment for

    48 Bible references are to the English Standard Version, unless stated otherwise.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    21/23

    18

    sin so that guilty men could be set free, and this is appropriate. However, the message is entirely

    incomplete if the glories of eternity are not proclaimed just as strongly. For what did Jesus

    ultimately save men for if it is not for eternity and all that it contains eternal life with God? The

    present days are existing between two points in time: Jesus life and ministry on earth on the one

    hand, and His coming return and the associated events on the other hand. The Christian faith

    looks back and it looks forward. Thus, the amount of emphasis that Lewis places on eternity

    seems right because it is biblical. Romans 8 is filled with this perspective. Paul promotes the fact

    that men will be raised in like manner to Jesus resurrection in verse 11. He asserts in verses 18-

    25 that present suffering is not to be compared with the glory to come, when even creation will

    be set free from the curse. And in verses 29-30, he proclaims the whole process of salvation,

    from foreknowledge to glorification.

    It is also worth noting that when Romans 6:23 speaks of the contrast to death as the

    wages of sin, it speaks of a free gift from God through Christ, and this gift is not forgiveness of

    sins, but eternal life. In Romans 13:11, Paul seeks to motivate his readers by reminding them

    that salvation is drawing ever-nearer. The focus of their action in the present is grounded in the

    hope of eternity. Peter speaks in a similar vein in both 1 st and 2nd Peter. 1 Peter 1:5 reminds the

    readers that they are those who by Gods power are being guarded through faith for a salvation

    ready to be revealed in the last time. All of 2 Peter chapter 3 is connected, either directly or

    indirectly, to the question and reality of Jesus future return. Peter reassures the church that Jesus

    is indeed coming, even though He seems to delay.

    The most extended biblical treatment of eternity is the book of Revelation. Throughout

    the book, eternity is consistently set forth as the grounds for hope. The seven letters to the

    churches look back to Jesus first coming, and look forward to His second. Similarly, the entire

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    22/23

    19

    story conveyed in Revelation is one of the future, presenting hope for martyrs, warnings for the

    complacent, and comfort and strength for the weary. Revelation provides reminders (similar to

    Lewis) that every person is either for Jesus or against Him; there is no neutral ground. Then

    chapters 21-22 of Revelation describe in grand terms the fact of eternity and all of the joys that

    will be a part of the great City of God.

    One final point that should be made in this conclusion concerns the nature of some of

    Lewis's claims; namely, that some of the claims (specifically in the fiction novels) are of a very

    speculative nature. Lewis himself did not want this to create undue cause for concern or division:

    The last thing I wish is to arouse factual curiosity about the details of the after-world.49 Here

    again is the impact of the imagination. Lewis appears to have speculated and imagined in such a

    way that was truly possible, with the emotions caught up in the joy of what has been promised.

    However, such speculation was not (and he was not claiming it to be) direct biblical truth. So

    even as Lewis's own eternal hope is dissected, care must be taken to differentiate between what

    is actually true and what is merely speculative. It is no use holding dogmatically to speculative

    understandings of things.

    In closing, it is best to be reminded once more of what has been discussed. All who are

    believers in Christ are not just saved from sin, but they are given eternal life. Jesus' followers

    have the opportunity to enjoy Him forever instead of wasting their lives on nothing. When that

    Great Day comes, all tears and pain will be wiped away, because God will have made His

    permanent home among men. Yes, please do come quickly, Lord Jesus!

    49 Lewis, The Great Divorce, x.

  • 7/27/2019 C. S. Lewis: Theologian of Eternal Hope

    23/23

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Lewis, C.S. The Four Loves. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1988.

    . The Grand Miracle. New York: Ballantine Books, 1970.

    . The Great Divorce. New York: HarperOne, 1973.

    .A Grief Observed.New York: HarperOne, 1994.

    . The Last Battle. New York: HarperTrophy, 1984.

    .Mere Christianity.New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001.

    .Miracles.New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001.

    . The Pilgrim's Regress. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.

    . The Problem of Pain. New York: HarperOne, 1996.

    . The Screwtape Letters. New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1980.

    . The Silver Chair.New York: HarperTrophy, 1981.

    . Suprised by Joy. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, 1955.

    . The Weight of Glory. New York: HarperSanFrancisco, 2001.

    . The World's Last Night: And Other Essays. Kindle Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

    Harcourt, 2002.

    20


Recommended