+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30...

CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30...

Date post: 01-Feb-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
168
CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT Annual Report to the Legislature 2014
Transcript
Page 1: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC

INTERCEPTIONS REPORT

Annual Reportto the

Legislature 2014

Page 2: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General

Division of Criminal Law

Appeals, Writs & Trials Unit This annual report is available on the

California Attorney General’s website: http://ag.ca.gov

Page 3: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

Table of Contents

Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................1 Table 1: Arrests and Convictions Resulting from Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014.....................................................................................................................................................2 Table 2: General Description of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ...................3

Table 3: Electronic Interception Orders Issued by Judges And Court Activity During Calendar Year 2014 ............................................................................................................................................4

Table 4: Description of Communications Obtained and Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ................................................................................................................5 Table 5: Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report ...................................................................59 Table 6: Costs of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014 ......................................113 Table 7: Jurisdiction Reporting No Electronic Interception Activity During Calendar Year 2014 ........................................................................................................................................158 Table 8: Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions Conducted in Prior Years ...........159 Table 9: List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed - Calendar Year 2014.. ...................................................................................................................163 Appendix A: Penal Code section 629.62 “Report by Attorney General” ......................................165

Page 4: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Executive Summary

The Attorney General’s Electronic Interceptions Report 2014, is issued pursuant to Penal Code section 629.62 and can be referenced on the Attorney General’s website at http://oag.ca.gov.

Electronic intercepts are legally sanctioned surveillance of electronic communications for law enforcement purposes. This report contains electronic interception data and describes how electronic intercepts have enhanced the ability of state and federal law enforcement agencies to identify and dismantle drug trafficking organizations (DTO), solve serious and violent crimes and incapacitate criminal street gangs. Multi-national DTO’s, criminal street gangs, and individuals often use telecommunications to advance their illegal objectives. These illegal objectives include kidnapping, organized crime, drug trafficking, and murder. Through use of court-authorized electronic intercepts, law enforcement has an effective tool to investigate and prevent these crimes. In some cases, electronic intercepts have led to solving decade-old crimes where no other avenue produced results. In other cases, DTO activity was halted and millions of dollars in narcotic proceeds as well as voluminous amounts of narcotics were seized. Several counties provide exemplary examples of the benefits of electronic intercepts: Stanislaus County (2014-STA-70) utilized electronic intercepts to dismantle a drug

smuggling cartel operating from Mexico to Northern California. As a result of the interceptions, over 700 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

Riverside County (2014-RIV-1097) worked with federal agents in using electronic

intercepts to gather intelligence to stop a large-scale cocaine smuggling operation based out of two South American countries.

Sonoma County (2014-SON-7) successfully employed electronic intercepts to

gather crucial information on a 1992 unsolved murder.

A Los Angeles County (2014-LA-811) investigation, which included electronic intercepts, of a DTO concluded with sixteen people arrested with more arrests expected, the seizure of $1 million in narcotic proceeds, 600 pounds of methamphetamine, and multiple vehicles.

From intelligence-gathering to arrests and prosecutions, these examples demonstrate that electronic intercepts are essential tools that law enforcement employs to combat the ever-changing criminal element. Though the report is divided into separate tables, the tables should be read in conjunction with one another to evaluate the impact intercepts have on public safety. Tables 1, 2, and 3 reflect the statistics of arrest, convictions and nature of intercept orders and post-intercept court activity. Table 4 contains a description of and optional commentary for each intercept. Table 5 represents compliance with the inventory notice requirement given to those who were subjected to intercepts. Table 6 shows the cost of each intercept. Table 7 lists counties with no intercepts to report. Table 8 provides supplemental information for intercepts approved prior to 2014 but completed later. Finally, Table 9 lists intercept orders which were never used. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please contact the Criminal Law Division of the Attorney General’s Office at (916) 445-9555.

1

Page 5: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 1 Arrests and Convictions Resulting from Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 20141

Reporting Jurisdiction

No of Orders

Number of

Persons Arrested

Arrest Offenses Conviction Offenses Number of Persons

Convicted To

tal

Avg

. per

O

rder

Mur

der

Gan

g

Nar

cotic

s

Terr

oris

m

Kid

napp

ing

Oth

er

Mur

der

Gan

g

Nar

cotic

s

Terr

oris

m

Kid

napp

ing

Oth

er

Tota

l

Avg

. per

O

rder

Alameda 10 14 7.0 2 12 0 Contra Costa 6 2 1.0 2 2 2 2 2 1.0

El Dorado 2 0 0 Fresno 24 23 11.5 20 23 20 0 Kern 19 13 3.3 2 11 3 3 0.8 Kings 2 4 2.0 4 0

Los Angeles 129 33 3.0 1 30 0 Madera 8 0 0 Merced 1 0 0 Napa 1 0 0

Orange 3 3 1.5 3 2 0 Placer 2 4 4.0 4 0

Riverside 624 176 2.2 166 0 Sacramento 6 19 4.8 3 16 0

San Bernardino 30 51 3.0 28 23 15 7 1 2 2 0.1 San Diego 14 34 5.7 32 18 18 3.0

San Joaquin 18 29 5.8 5 25 0 Santa Barbara 4 10 3.3 10 10 5 5 1.7

Santa Clara 13 35 8.8 2 11 28 3 3 0.8 Sonoma 2 1 1.0 1 0

Stanislaus 14 12 4.0 2 10 1 1 0.3 Tulare 11 3 1.5 0

Ventura 28 16 3.2 2 6 8 2 5 7 1.4 Total: 971 482

59 109 351 7 0 23 2 4 37 0 0 0 41

1 The disparity between “Number of Persons Arrested” and “Number of Persons Convicted” may be attributed to the fact that a number of those arrested are pending either charges or trial, a process which could take a period of time, or that the intercept was a part of a large-scale investigation.

2

Page 6: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 2 General Description of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction

No. of Orders

Targeted Offenses (Offenses Specified in Order) Targeted Location Targeted Device

Mur

der

Gan

g

Nar

cotic

s

Terr

oris

m

Kid

napp

ing

Oth

er

Res

iden

ce

Bus

ines

s

Publ

ic A

rea

Port

able

de

vice

Oth

er

Cel

l Pho

ne

Land

Lin

e

Page

r

Com

pute

r

Oth

er

Alameda 10 10 8 10 10 Contra Costa 6 4 4 6 6

El Dorado 2 2 2 2 Fresno 24 3 14 21 20 22 Kern 19 6 13 1 18 1 Kings 2 2 1 1 1 2 1

Los Angeles 129 18 3 104 8 4 67 3 126 4 9 1 Madera 8 8 1 8 Merced 1 1 1 1 Napa 1 1 1 1

Orange 3 3 3 3 Placer 2 2 2 2

Riverside 624 2 603 624 622 Sacramento 6 2 4 1 6 6 1

San Bernardino 30 8 22 30 30 San Diego 14 2 12 2 14 14 3

San Joaquin 18 18 15 14 17 Santa Barbara 4 1 3 3 3 4 4 4

Santa Clara 13 2 6 10 2 1 13 13 2 Sonoma 2 2 2 2

Stanislaus 14 1 1 13 14 14 Tulare 11 11 2 10 11

Ventura 28 3 7 24 28 28

3

Page 7: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 3 Electronic Interception Orders Issued by Judges And Court Activity During Calendar Year 20142

Reporting Jurisdiction

Number of Intercept Orders Number of Extensions Total

Duration of Wiretaps

Motions to

Suppress Number of

Trials Resulting

from Intercepts

App

licat

ions

Gra

nted

Mod

ified

/Am

ende

d

Den

ied

Not

Inst

alle

d/

Inst

alle

d N

ot U

sed

App

licat

ions

Gra

nted

Mod

ified

/Am

ende

d D

enie

d N

ot In

stal

led/

In

stal

led

Not

Use

d A

vera

ge L

engt

h

Req

uest

ed D

ays

Act

ual D

ays

Avg

. per

Ord

er

Gra

nted

Den

ied

Pend

ing

Alameda 10 9 1 300 230 23 0 Contra Costa 6 6 180 153 53 2 0

El Dorado 2 2 1 1 2 21 20 10 0 Fresno 24 24 2 2 30 780 499 21 0 Kern 19 19 1 1 1 1 30 600 366 19 0 Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0

Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5 5 0

Orange 3 3 90 16 5 0 Placer 2 2 60 35 18 0

Riverside 624 602 6 10 191 184 7 10 30 24403 17009 27 0 Sacramento 6 6 2 2 140 98 16 0

San Bernardino 30 30 1 1 18 18 1 30 1440 1259 42 0 San Diego 14 14 1 1 10 10 1 1 30 720 590 42 1 0

San Joaquin 18 17 3 2 30 600 497 28 0 Santa Barbara 4 4 90 63 16 0

Santa Clara 13 13 1 3 3 27 472 337 26 0 Sonoma 2 2 60 9 5 0

Stanislaus 14 14 2 2 30 480 359 26 1 Tulare 11 11 4 4 30 434 394 36 0

Ventura 28 28 15 27 27 15 0 840 642 23 2 0

2 The purpose of obtaining electronic intercept evidence is not always trial-focused and may relate to further investigation at the state or federal level as well as crime prevention. 4

Page 8: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Alameda 2014-ALA-19 257 9,967 4 96

Wiretap targeted a murder suspect. Suspect was arrested and charged based in part upon the intercepted communications and surveillance operations conducted during the interception. Case is pending.

2014-ALA-20 18 240 1 99

Wire tap operation targeted a murder suspect. Suspect was arrested and charged based in part upon the wire interception and accompanying surveillance. Case is still active and pending.

2014-ALA-24 120 11,592 3 97

2014-ALA-28 45 555 10 90

2014-ALA-29 433 6,908 17 83

2014-ALA-30 257 8,395 2 98

2014-ALA-31 205 7,407 9 91

2014-ALA-32 167 5,593 23 77

2014-ALA-33 92 2,352 4 96

2014-ALA-34 144 4,185 4 96

Contra Costa 2014-CO-1 8,230

2014-CO-2 180 2,205 13 87

2014-CC-8 2,017

2014-CC-9 3,011 See CCCDA 14-001.

2014-CC-10 0 See CCCDA 14-006.

2014-CC-11 0

El Dorado 2014-ED-1 64 996 1 99 A phone intercept was conducted to investigate a potential murder-for-hire plot on a peace officer.

2014-ED-2 27 411 1 99 See 2014-ED-1.

3 Comments are not mandated and may be edited 5

Page 9: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Fresno 2014-FR-6 187 8,320 11 89

This wiretap was used to investigate an attempted murder. The interceptions provided information regarding narcotic trafficking. Detectives arrested five suspects and seized two vehicles and $14,110 in narcotic proceeds, 37 pounds of marijuana, 2,336 milliliters of Codeine and 29 Oxycodone tablets. The suspects arrested are known to be involved in narcotic sales and violent crimes. The seized narcotics and the suspects arrested will have a positive impact on the community.

2014-FR-7 36 339 3 97 See 2014-FR-6.

2014-FR-8 9 316 3 97 See 2014-FR-6.

2014-FR-9 12 239 66 44

This wire interrupted a major supply source of methamphetamine in the Fresno area. The target phone was intercepted and monitored to identify those involved in transportation and distribution.

2014-FR-11 26 563 52 48 This wire is part of an ongoing effort to interupt a major supply source of methamphetamine in the Fresno area.

2014-FR-13 6 108 41 59 See 2014-FR-11.

2014-FR-14 16 272 73 27 See 2014-FR-11.

2014-FR-15 23 648 39 61 See 2014-FR-11.

2014-FR-16 62 2,166 39 61

Through related wires, agents identified a drug trafficking organization (DTO) that operated out of Southern California, Arizona, and Mexico. The investigation is ongoing and dismantling of the DTO is anticipated.

2014-FR-17 29 565 28 72

This wire resulted in the arrest of one subject, seizure of 17 pounds of narcotics, as well as the identification of co-conspirators and sources of supply. One additional arrest is expected and an additional warrant for arrest was issued for major narcotics transactions.

2014-FR-18 84 1,266 47 53 See FR-2014-16.

6

Page 10: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Fresno (cont’d) 2014-FR-19 270 1,106 29 71

During this investigation, agents made 43 arrests, seized 7 pounds of cocaine, 43 pounds of methamphetamine, 15 guns, $52,000 in narcotic proceeds, and served 18 search warrants. Subsequently, the investigation targeted a specific criminal street gang and dismantled a gang-related DTO and removed much of the capability of that gang to raise funds through the distribution of illegal drugs.

2014-FR-20 44 40 30 70 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-21 204 3,932 42 58 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-22 0 0 0 0 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-23 295 690 24 76 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-24 268 1,436 28 72 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-25 87 532 32 68 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-26 79 901 29 71 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-27 322 9,338 19 81 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-28 62 205 33 67 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-29 158 425 32 68 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-30 92 169 29 71 See 2014-FR-19.

2014-FR-31 116 168 39 61 See 2014-FR-19.

Kern 2013-KE-35 206 5,557 14 86

A county, state, and federal task force investigated a regional drug trafficking organization (DTO) operating in Central California, with suspected direct ties to an unknown DTO in Mexico. The DTO was believed to have been capable of distributing multiple pounds of illicit narcotics, specifically crystal methamphetamine (45 lbs. at a time) and heroin, within Kern County. This investigation is ongoing with plans to disrupt and/or dismantle the major drug operation.

2013-KE-36 206 609 15 85 See 2014-KE-35.

7

Page 11: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Kern (cont’d) 2014-KE-37 2 14 93 7

Law enforcement recovered two firearms, six pounds of crystal methamphetamine, quantities of cocaine and heroin, and 200 marijuana plants during an investigation into a multi-state and multi-country drug organization. This investigation resulted in the seizure of the account, which contained $40,000, and the arrests of two people who pled guilty and have been sentenced.

2014-KE-38 1 15 100 0

During a multi-agency (county/state/federal) ongoing investigation into importation and distribution of narcotics, agents were able to disrupt and impede the subject’s ability to import narcotics.

2014-KE-39 148 16,760 2 98

At the conclusion of the wiretap, the multiagency task force successfully dismantled the drug trafficking organization (DTO). Law enforcement was also able to make a large impact on two local gangs. Without the evidence obtained from intercepted conversations, this investigation would not have been as successful in identifying the known gang members.

2014-KE-40 1 4 50 50 See 2014-KE-38.

2014-KE-41 40 2,518 3 97 See 2014-KE-39.

2014-KE-42 22 581 4.5 95 See 2014-KE-39.

2014-KE-43 75 11,930 2 98 See 2014-KE-39.

2014-KE-44 0 See 2014-KE-39.

2014-KE-45 4 248 10 90

A multiagency and multistate investigation identified a large scale cocaine broker working in Kern County who was directly connected to drug trafficking cartels located in Tijuana. Agents passed investigative leads to law enforcement officers in other counties and states as a result of this wiretap investigation. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-KE-46 3 86 45 55 See 2014-KE-45.

2015-KE-47 14 190 35 65 Further investigation regarding a double murder is pending.

2015-KE-48 14 38 0 100 See 2014-KE-45.

8

Page 12: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Kern (cont’d) 2014-KE-49 5 1,639 35 65

This investigation identified a narcotics trafficker dealing in high quantities of crystal methamphetamine. Three subjects were successfully identified and federally indicted. Furthermore, the investigation resulted in the seizure of $14,004 and 3 pounds of crystal methamphetamine. The availability and amount of crystal methamphetamine in the area has been decreased.

2014-KE-50 14 5,626 2 98

This was a homicide investigation regarding a conspiracy to commit murder. Detectives arrested both conspirators and this case is pending in the Kern County Superior Court.

2014-KE-51 14 5,626 2 98 See 2014-KE-50.

2014-KE-52 14 5,626 2 98 See 2014-KE-50.

2014-KE-53 14 5,626 2 98 See 2014-KE-50.

Kings 2014-KI-16 9 4,200 An automatic rifle and marijuana were seized. Three people were arrested for a gang-related homicide.

2014-KI-17 1 6 Wire was initiated to intercept evidence for a murder-for-hire plot.

Los Angeles 2014-LA-747 294 8,258 The wiretap provided additional evidence against the suspect, a gang member. An arrest is pending.

2014-LA-748 43 315 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-749 380 3,915 14 100

2014-LA-750 47 967 This WT2 report covers Los Angeles County wiretap 14-01 for Target Telephone #50.

2014-LA-751 96 3,506 The subject discontinued using this phone. This investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-752 5 220 24 76 This WT2 report covers Los Angeles County wiretap 14-03 for Target Telephone #51.

2014-LA-753 380 3,915 14 86 The subject discontinued using both phones as their primary means of communication. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-754 50 566 24 76 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

9

Page 13: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-755 96 3,506 2.5 97.5

The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-756 5 64 84 16

2014-LA-757 380 5,558 14.5 85 The subjects discontinued using both phones as their primary means of communication. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-758 103 3,501 37 63

Based on intercepted conversations, law enforcement conducted surveillance and served a search warrant at a stash location. Investigators seized 50 pounds of methamphetamine, 10 kilograms of cocaine and $21,900 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-LA-759 37 568 16 84 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-760 4 23 50 50 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-761 43 315 4 96 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-762 0 0 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-763 64 2,353 8 92 The ubject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-764 79 2,769 32 68 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-765 968 8,462 4 96 The subject used the phone to conduct narcotics trafficking activities involving marijuana. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-766 50 2,454 20 80 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-768 75 1,001 20 80 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-769 0 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-770 36 716 18 82 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-771 19 3,433 10 90 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-772 169 6,563 36 64 One arrest was made and 36 grams of cocaine was seized.

10

Page 14: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-773 61 2,771 13 87

The subjects of this investigation are believed to have temporarily suspended their narcotics trafficking due to seizures of narcotics and proceeds of narcotics in the days and weeks prior to this wiretap. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-774 105 2,750 20 80 One arrest was made, and agents seized 9 pounds of methamphetamine and $25,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-LA-775 125 1,965 11 89 Based on interceptions obtained from Wiretap 14-42, 2 subjects were arrested, and 6 pounds of methamphetamine were seized.

2014-LA-776 93 821 27 73 The subject obtained a new phone which was being used as the primary means of communication.

2014-LA-777 10 175 15 85 The subject was arrested with 11 kilograms of cocaine.

2014-LA-778 63 776 22 78 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-779 86 4,501 14 86 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-780 0 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-781 5 1,342 12 88 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-782 5 61 10 90 The subject discontinued use of this phone after an unrelated arrest. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-783 27 559 23 77

The intercepted communications have assisted investigators identify other phone numbers and individuals engaged in the distribution of narcotics. The investigation is ongoing in order to identify and dismantle this Southern California-based narcotics trafficking network.

2013-LA-786 846 33,991 Subjects were believed to be invovled in murders that occurred in 2012 and 2013.

2014-LA-787 16 621 7 93 Target telephone intercepted for approximately 8 days before the phone was disposed.

2014-LA-788 279 4,823 20 80 The subjects discontinued using these phone. The investigation is ongoing.

11

Page 15: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LAK-2 168 2,909 37 63

The subject was involved in a money-laundering operation. This intercept provided significant leads to other investigations and cases. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-789 168 2,909 37 63 See 2014-LAK-2.

2014-LA-790 205 10,813 5 95 Intercept for an ongoing homicide investigation with pending prosecution.

2014-LA-791 187 2,061 6 94 Subjects were believed to be involved murders that occurred in 1992.

2014-LA-792 1,286 3 97 Interception confirmed narcotics trafficking activity.

2014-LA-793 25 2,890 2 98 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-794 24 159 25 75 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-795 95 2,167 45 55 Interceptions led to the identification of numerous sources of supply and have resulted in the initiation of additional federal investigations.

2014-LA-796 8 185 26 74 Subject(s) were believed to be involved in a 1994 murder.

2014-LA-797 28 3,513 29 71

Subject believed to be using devices to conduct narcotics trafficking activities involving cocaine methamphetamine, and marijuana. The investigation is ongoing.

13-155 0 0 0 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-800 51 316 25 75

During the interception, investigators were able to learn about the structure, members, and methods of operation of this drug trafficking organization (DTO).

2014-LA-801 85 953 60 40 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-804 91 1,464 3 97 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-805 217 10,365 9 91 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-806 15 272 48 52 The subject discontinued using these phones. The investigation is ongoing.

12

Page 16: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-807 36 456 17 83

Interceptions from wiretap 14-85 contributed to the arrest of one person and the seizure of 2 kilograms of heroin.

2014-LA-808 0 0 0 0 The subjects discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-809 87 6,426 15 85

Based on the intercepted calls obtained as a result of this wiretap, narcotics and narcotic proceeds were seized and six individuals have been identified for future criminal charges. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-810 46 711 36 64 See 2014-LA-809.

2014-LA-811 162 2 19 81

Investigation into the trafficking of methamphetamine from Mexico into California. The results of the five month long wiretap investigation resulted in seizure of: 600 pounds of methamphetamine, 1 million dollars, 16 arrests (four more pending) and five seized vehicles. Other than the four currently convicted on federal charges, the remaining individuals have been or are being filed on for state charges involving the transportation of methamphetamine.

2014-LA-812 62 3,137 46 53

Investigation has led to the identification of additional co-conspirators, tracking methods, and the initiation of additional federal investigations.

2014-LA-813 6 67 30 70 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-814 3 206 7 93 This wiretap helped identify additional members within the organization, including a possible source of supply.

2014-LA-815 36 1,278 13 87

Interceptions led to the identification of narcotics traffickers operating in Los Angeles County and their methods used to traffic narcotics into and through the United States. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-816 29 1,291 18 82 The subject is using multiple phones. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-817 0 4 0 100 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-818 78 3,052 4 96 No significant enforcement activity during this 30 day period.

13

Page 17: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Los Angeles

(cont’d) 2014-LA-820 116 4,688 12 88

2014-LA-821 32 1,793 12 88 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-822 110 7,887

The intercepted communications over 14-26 have assisted investigators identify other phone numbers and individuals engaged in the distribution of narcotics. Investigators will continue to investigate these phone numbers and indivduals in order to identify and dismantle this Southern California based narcotics trafficking network.

2014-LA-823 626 19,747 3 97 Subjects involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing and arrests are imminent.

2014-LA-824 0 2 0 0 The subject discontinued using this phone. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-825 70 319 3 97 Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing and arrests are imminent.

2014-LA-826 61 11,894 40 60

The wiretap assisted in the disruption of a drug trafficking organization (DTO). It also led to the seizure of $33,500 in narcotic proceeds, 3,710.8 grams of methamphetamine, 568.7 grams of cocaine, and 5.4 grams of crack cocaine. The investigation also led to the arrest of six subjects.

2014-LA-827 12 208 4 96 Subject is involved in the murders that occurred in 2012 and 2013.

2014-LA-828 14 774 8 92 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LAS-6 1 131 0 100 This wiretap was to help identify additional members within the organization, including a possible source of supply.

2014-LA-829 36 712 35 65 Interceptions have identified multiple narcotics distributors and sources of supply and additional federal investigations are ongoing.

2014-LA-831 62 3,137 47 53

Interceptions have led to the identification of additional co-conspirators, trafficking methods, and the initiation of additional federal investigations.

14

Page 18: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Los Angeles

(cont’d) 2014-LA-832 61 2,449 80 20 See 2014-LA-826.

2014-LA-833 109 8,850 37 63 Interception led to intelligence regarding a larger DTO associated with these subjects.

2014-LA-834 181 5,647 68 32

The interceptions on this cell phone enabled investigators to determine the scope of involvement of the subject and identify other subjects that would have a more substantial impact on the DTO if intercepted and apprehended.

2014-LA-835 94 1,965 40 60

The intercepted communications allowed investigators to further identify the sources of supply for narcotics entering the United States from Mexico and additional distribution points within Los Angeles.

2014-LA-836 1 131 0 100 The wiretap was to help identify additional members within the organization, including a possible source of supply.

2014-LA-838 32 1,653 8 92 Interception led to intelligence regarding a larger DTO associated with this subject.

2014-LA-839 54 1,336 36 64 This interception has led to eight additional suspects. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-840 28 3,513 29 71

Phones used to conduct narcotics trafficking activities involving cocaine, methamphetamine, and marijuana. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-841 28 166 6 94

2014-LA-842 0 3,986 8 92

Wiretap provided crucial information into the trafficking habits and activities of the DTO as well as information on additional DTO members.

2014-LA-843 0 0 0 100 No criminal charges resulted from the interceptions obtained to this intercept (wiretap) order.

2014-LA-844 77 1 0 100 See 2014-LA-811.

2014-LA-845 39 626 9 93 No significant enforcement activity during this 30-day period.

2014-LA-847 0 3 0 100 No pertinent interception made. Phone appeared to be inactive. Case is still active.

15

Page 19: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-848 163 1,792 11 89

Primary of target telephone identified, located, and arrested on federal indictment. Case is still active.

2014-LA-849 60 571 18 82 Seizure of 7 kilograms of heroin and forfeiture of vehicle with man-made hidden compartments (Traps). Case is still active.

2014-LA-850 59 3,224 2 98 Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing and arrests are imminent.

2014-LA-851 63 5,324 84 16

During the course of this wiretap investigators seized 34 pounds of methamphetamine and have identified numerous other subjects invovled in smuggling large amounts of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin into the United States and the Los Angeles area.

2014-LA-852 36 2,869 59 41

The intercepted communications allowed investigators to further identify the supplier of narcotics entering the United States from Mexico and subjects that were transporting narcotics from Mexico into Los Angeles area.

2014-LA-853 70 4,898 5 95

Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder and gang related activity. The wiretap assisted in solving the murder, investigation is ongoing, and arrests are imminent.

2014-LA-854 1 0 0 100 Subject discontinued use of both phones before any law enforcement action could be taken.

2014-LA-855 69 2,928 10 90

Based on wiretap intercepts, agents were able to ascertain the wire subject was sending bulk currency to Mexico. Agents were able to intercept and seize $28,178 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-LA-856 25 0 0 100 Interceptions identified multiple cocaine and methamphetamine couriers.

2014-LA-857 133 28,323 7 93 Cases have been submitted to the District Attorney's Office for filing.

2014-LA-858 279 24,677 10 90 Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The investigation is ongoing, and arrests are imminent.

16

Page 20: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (contd) 2014-LA-859 712 38,882 7 93

Subject was involved in a conspiracy to commit murder and gang related activity. The wiretap assisted in solving the murder, investigation is ongoing, and arrests are imminent.

2014-LA-860 27 1,406 65 35 Interceptions indentified a source of supply which led to an additional federal investigation.

2014-LA-861 146 7,574 8 92

Subjects were involved in a conspiracy to commit murder. The wiretap assisted investigators in solving this murder investigation. Arrests are pending.

2014-LA-862 45 760 44 56 No seizures have been made.

2014-LA-863 45 5,847 6 94

With the help of the electronic interceptions, investigators are able to compile enough evidence to submit the case to the District Attorney's Office for filing.

2014-LA-864 75 10,430 4 96

With the help of the electronic interceptions, investigators are able to compile enough evidence to submit the case to the District Attorney's Office for filing.

2014-LA-866 11 79 1 99

Identified a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) and Targets of Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles County supplying narcotics to gangs in Southern and Central California.

2014-LA-867 163 1,792 11 89 Primary subject identified, located, and arrested on unrelated federal indictment. Case is still active.

2014-LA-868 26 76 51 49 Interceptions identified multiple cocaine and methamphetamine couriers and and an additional cellular phone used by the subject.

2014-LA-869 15 0 0 100

The interceptions led to the arrest of five individuals and the seizures of 4 kilograms of cocaine, and $121,485 in narcotic proceeds. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-LA-870 73 3,002 13 87 This was an emergency wiretap to prevent a possible murder.

2014-LAS-7 205 2,700 38 62

Identified a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) and Targets of Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles County supplying narcotics to gangs in Southern and Central California.

2014-LA-871 85 2,394 3 97 No significant enforcement acitivity during this 30-day period.

17

Page 21: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LAS-8 113 5,058 76 24

Interceptions directly led to the arrest of three (3) individuals, the seizure of 5 pounds of methamphetamine, 1.5 kilograms of cocaine, $25,379 in narcotic proceeds, and two vehicles.

2014-LA-872 0 862 27 73 This case is ongoing due to the arrest made of associates of the primary target. The subject is no longer using the phone.

2014-LA-873 11 445 9 91

This was a beneficial interception period. Agents intercepted possible sources of methamphetamine and cocaine generating new leads in the investigation. The case is ongoing.

2014-LA-874 12 181 1 99

No seizures were made based on the interceptions of TT#1. The subject did not utilize TT#1 after the initial interception of the Target Telephone.

2014-LA-876 92 5,463 7 93 No arrests related to wiretap; case is still active.

2014-LA-877 75 3,905 4 96 No arrests related to the wiretap; case is still active.

2014-LA-878 25 500 11 89

Identified a Transnational Criminal Organization (TCO) and Targets of Influence (TOI) in Los Angeles County supplying narcotics to gangs in Southern and Central California.

2014-LA-879 274 8,583 6 94 No arrests related to wiretap; case is still active.

2014-LA-880 46 7,819 29 71 See 2014-LA-826.

2014-LA-881 1 4,941 99 1

This wiretap was used to investigate an unsolved murder and other crimes committed by members of a violent criminal street gang. The information will assist in identifying the persons responsible for this crime.

2014-LA-883 42 226 35 65

2014-LA-884 55 1,437 18 82

Madera 2014-MAD-5 92 957 25 75

The intercept provided information regarding a drug trafficking organization transporting methamphetamine up from Mexico to distribute in Madera County.

2014-MAD-7 95 2,174 18 82 See 2014-MAD-7.

2014-MAD-8 37 282 27 73 See 2014-MAD-7.

2014-MAD-9 53 462 18 82 See 2014-MAD-7.

18

Page 22: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Madera (cont’d) 2014-MAD-10 65 660 7 93 See 2014-MAD-7.

2014-MAD-12 58 442 24 76 See 2014-MAD-7.

2014-MAD-13 35 229 46 54 See 2014-MAD-7.

2014-MAD-15 21 205 22 78 See 2014-MAD-7.

Merced 2014-MER-27 1,060 54,058 This was a major operation targeting criminal street gang members and their associates in Merced County who were trafficking narcotics.

Napa 2014-NA-1 2 16 0 100

This intercept was obtained to investigate a murder. No incriminating conversations were obtained, and after five days, the operation was shut down.

Orange 2014-OR-86 5 709 36 64

The intercepts provided valuable assistance in developing probable cause to arrest two individuals for murder. These individuals have since been charged with the raping and murdering of four people.

2014-OR-87 36 78 4 96 The interceptions resulted in the arrest of one individual for murder. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-OR-88 21 202 10 90 The interceptions led to the arrest of one individual for murder. The investigation is ongoing.

Placer 2014-PLA-3 39 493 31 69

Wiretap was extremely useful and instrumental in solving a cold case homicide. The information on the wire corroborated other evidence and provided admissions to the homicide. Without the wiretap, this case would have remained unsolved. The wire also allowed us to pinpoint the suspects' location for easy apprehension once probable cause was established for an arrest warrant. This minimizing risk to law enforcement and others. Four defendants are in custody facing a murder charge.

Placer (cont’d) 2014-PLA-4 19 555 11 89 See 2014-PLA-4.

Riverside 2013-RIV-899 0

2013-RIV-902 0

2013-RIV-904 0

2013-RIV-905 0

19

Page 23: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-906 49 1,807 23 77 No significant events.

2013-RIV-911 11 163 1 99

2013-RIV-915 0

2013-RIV-916 23 617 21 79 As a result of this wiretap interception order, $19,100 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2013-RIV-922 54 518 7 93

2013-RIV-925 36 3,006 8 92

2013-RIV-926 0

2013-RIV-927 0

2013-RIV-928 56 4,534 20 80 This wiretap interception order was used to help identify the user's source of supply.

2013-RIV-929 0

2013-RIV-930 219 6,729 30 70

2013-RIV-931 178 13,786 3 97

2013-RIV-932 105 1,056 8 92

2013-RIV-933 0

2013-RIV-934 0

2013-RIV-935 19 302 7 93 As a result of this wiretap interception, 46 pounds of methamphetamine and 11 kilograms of cocaine were seized.

2013-RIV-936 0

2013-RIV-937 168 16,543 6 94

As a result of this wiretap interception order, $4 million in narcotic proceeds along with 22 kilograms of cocaine and 10 kilograms of heroin were seized.

2013-RIV-938 282 5,848 5 95

2013-RIV-939 0

2013-RIV-940 77 3,612 25 75

2013-RIV-941 40 697 63 37 This wiretap interception order led to an arrest of one individual and the seizure of 10 pounds of methamphetamine.

2013-RIV-942 21 564 7 93

20

Page 24: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-943 118 2,837 26 74

Traffic interdiction led to seizure of $3.7 million, which was hidden in interior gas tanks. Two were arrested and 1 kilogram of cocaine was also seized.

2013-RIV-944 87 832 28 72

During the investigation and wiretap interception, investigators learned about methods of operation, the drug trafficking organization (DTO) membership and stash locations associated with this DTO.

2013-RIV-945 417 13,174 5 95

As a result of this wiretap interception order, investigators were able to seize $17,000 in narcotic proceeds and a ½ pound of heroin.

2013-RIV-946 123 10,206 17 83 This wiretap investigation assisted in the identification of co-conspirators within the drug trafficking organization.

2013-RIV-947 0

2013-RIV-948 8 1,370 4 96

2013-RIV-949 2 9 0 100

2013-RIV-950 4 102 5 95 These subjects discontinued use of their phones during the interceptions; investigation is ongoing.

2013-RIV-951 0 6 0 100 The subjects discontinued use of their phones during this wiretap interception investigation.

2013-RIV-952 118 1,360 17 83

As a result of this wiretap interception order, $800,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized, as well as 22 kilograms of cocaine and 10 kilograms of heroin.

2013-RIV-954 0

2013-RIV-955 0

2013-RIV-956 0 0 0 0

2014-RIV-957 269 2,763 5 95

2014-RIV-958 21 870 7 93 Target telephone intercepts led to the identification of the supply source.

2014-RIV-959 121 12,829 4 96 No results to report.

2014-RIV-960 16 728 14 86

21

Page 25: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-961 99 1,851 9 91

The following were seized as a result of this wiretap interception order: 5 kilograms of cocaine, 6 pounds of heroin, 6 pounds of methamphetamine, and $24,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-962 400 14,473 24 76 During this wiretap interception order, agents seized 2 kilograms of heroin and 14 firearms, and made one arrest.

2014-RIV-963 194 5,932 40 60

During this wiretap interception, agents identified additional drug trafficking organization members (DTO), stash locations, and methods of operation.

2014-RIV-964 5 386 7 93

2014-RIV-965 249 1,326 5 95 Investigation is pending.

2014-RIV-966 26 860 52 48

2014-RIV-967 28 3,939 7 93

2014-RIV-968 5 342 62 38 Additional target telephones are currently being intercepted to further investigate this Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO).

2014-RIV-969 87 2,918 15 85 Interceptions from this wiretap order resulted in identification of co-conspirators to the DTO.

2014-RIV-970 16 152 80 20

As a result of this wiretap interception order, investigators were able to seize 54 kilograms of cocaine and made five arrests; investigation is ongoing and any prosecution is pending. Subject also discontinued use of phone during the interception.

2014-RIV-971 39 5,313 25 75 No significant events; investigation is ongoing.

2014-RIV-972 0

2014-RIV-973 0

2014-RIV-974 0

2014-RIV-975 59 35,720 22 78 As a result of this wire interception, 43 kilograms of cocaine and $1,157,010 were seized.

2014-RIV-976 24 1,403 33 67

As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents seized 52 pounds of methamphetamine and $11,000. Three arrests are pending prosecution.

22

Page 26: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-977 94 3,009 12 88

As a result of this wire interception, 8.5 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-980 4 1,107 0 100 No significant events to report

2014-RIV-981 11 730 11 89

2014-RIV-982 7 1,042 3 97

2014-RIV-983 61 2,239 17 83 As a result of this wire interception, $133,500 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-984 18 1,220 15 85

2014-RIV-985 46 450 77 23

As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents were able to identify the customer base as well as a Mexico-based narcotics cell head. Interceptions assisted in locating and identifying a second subject and telephone numbers of couriers.

2014-RIV-986 0

2014-RIV-987 0

2014-RIV-988 0

2014-RIV-989 32 253 43 57 No significant events to report.

2014-RIV-990 67 1,793 20 80

2014-RIV-991 161 5,814 15 85

This interception order assisted law enforcement agents to learn the identity and roles of other co-conspirators and the hierarchy of the drug trafficking organization.

2014-RIV-992 59 2,752 5 95

As a result of this wire interception order, two subjects were arrested, and 1.5 pounds of cocaine and $21,810 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-993 217 7,388 10 90

2014-RIV-994 17 6,255 65 35 As a result of this wire interception, 9.8 kilograms of cocaine was seized.

2014-RIV-995 17 396 32 68

Based off of this wiretap interception order, it was found that the primary user of the phone was going to facilitate a shipment of narcotics from Mexico to U.S. However, the intercept expired prior to receiving any further details of the narcotic transition.

23

Page 27: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-996 19 379 52 48

2013-RIV-997 47 499 24 76

2014-RIV-998 16 194 3 97 No significant events to report; investigation is ongoing.

2014-RIV-999 736 21,326 14 86

2014-RIV-1000 0

2014-RIV-1001 37 2,031 11 89

2014-RIV-1002 0

2014-RIV-1003 0

2014-RIV-1004 0 1 0 100 No significant events to report.

2014-RIV-1005 56 2,619 8 92 As a result of this wire interception, 6 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1006 40 503 18 82

2014-RIV-1007 18 706 7 93

2014-RIV-1008 62 1,376 33 67 No seizures to report.

2014-RIV-1009 5,266 6,028 5 95 No significant events occurred over the 30 days of interception.

2014-RIV-1010 15 203 15 85

Information from this wire led to further surveillance and investigative actions which resulted in the seizure of 72 kilograms of cocaine from another target.

2014-RIV-1011 65 718 18 82

2014-RIV-1012 47 935 27 73

During the interception, investigators seized 55 pounds of methamphetamine, 20 kilograms of heroin, and $21,900 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1013 0

2014-RIV-1014 1 11 0 100

2014-RIV-1016 0

2014-RIV-1017 0 Installed - but not used.

2014-RIV-1018 81 3,763 17 83

2014-RIV-1019 8 59 22 77 During the wiretap interception, investigators were able to seize $45,000 in narcotic proceeds.

24

Page 28: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1020 22 178 41 59

As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents were able to seize 13 kilograms of cocaine and made one arrest.

2014-RIV-1021 0

2014-RIV-1022 46 4,135 28 72

During this wiretap intercept investigation, three individuals were arrested, 1 vehicle, 5 pounds of methamphetamine, and $76,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1023 15 412 17 83 The wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 5 pounds of heroin, and the identification of other co-conspirators.

2014-RIV-1024 102 1,563 5 95

The wiretap interception order was essential in identifying and disrupting the drug trafficking organization (DTO). Furthermore, agents are able to dismantle the structure of this DTO.

2014-RIV-1025 4 211 20 80

2014-RIV-1026 0 1 0 100 Installed - but not used.

2014-RIV-1027 19 410 80 20 As a result of this wire interception, 5,000 pounds of marijuana was seized from the drug trafficking organization (DTO).

2014-RIV-1028 1 118 0 100 This subject discontinued the use of cell phone.

2014-RIV-1029 35 2,851 11 89

2014-RIV-1030 163 2,509 38 62

As a result of this wire interception, 138 kilgrams of cocaine was seized from within exterior reservoir fuel tanks, two people were arrested, and the truck was seized.

2014-RIV-1031 139 3,522 12 88 As a result of this wire interception, 18 pounds of heroin was seized and made one arrest.

2014-RIV-1032 3 374 6 94

2014-RIV-1033 108 1,268 19 81 During this investigation, agents seized $500,000 in narcotic proceeds and made one arrest.

2014-RIV-1034 30 183 40 60

2014-RIV-1035 0

2014-RIV-1036 49 960 33 67 As a result of this wire interception, two persons arrested, and 10 pounds of methamphetamine seized.

25

Page 29: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1037 35 471 15 85

As a result of this wire interception, four arrests made and 6 pounds of methamphetamine seized.

2014-RIV-1039 38 1,402 14 86

During this wiretap interception order, agents identified further co- conspirators within the DTO along with locations of stash houses and methods of operation.

2014-RIV-1040 0 18 0 100

2014-RIV-1041 0

2014-RIV-1042 27 83 16 84 Federally Funded - No significant events.

2014-RIV-1043 37 986 64 36

This particular wiretap interception order led to seizures of 90 grams of cocaine, 479 grams of marijuana, and 5 grams of methamphetamine. A search warrant served out-of-state also uncovered and closed a drug stash house.

2014-RIV-1044 0

2014-RIV-1045 91 8,273 20 80 As a result of this wire interception, 17 pounds of methamphetamine and 5 pounds of heroin were seized.

2013-RIV-1046 98 2,020 5 95

As a result of this wire interception, 160 pounds of methamphetamine, 200 gallons of liquid methamphetamine, and $850,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1047 1 1 0 100

2014-RIV-1048 15 163 25 75 Intercepts provided additional information regarding narcotics customers and structure of the drug trafficking organization (DTO).

2014-RIV-1049 36 59,257 39 61

As a result of this wire interception, seizures included 7.7 kilograms of heroin (China White), 20.79 kilograms of cocaine, and 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1050 79 3,489 30 70

2014-RIV-1051 4 490 10 90

2014-RIV-1052 47 2,242 16 84 This target telephone was terminated after 30 days.

2014-RIV-1053 129 4,619 18 82

2014-RIV-1054 326 2,409 21 79

Agents seized $6 million in narcotic proceeds and made three arrests. Interceptions also led to the identification of others within the DTO.

26

Page 30: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1055 0

2014-RIV-1056 0

2014-RIV-1057 0

2014-RIV-1058 65 1,134 26 74 As a result of this wiretap interception, 11 kilograms of cocaine and 5 pounds of methamphetamine were seized.

2014-RIV-1059 81 9,023 1 99 No criminal charges resulted from this wiretap interception order.

2014-RIV-1060 5 48 58 42

2014-RIV-1061 25 1,479 4 96

During the course of this wiretap, the primary user of the intercepted telephone was arrested on narcotics charges relating to the seizure of 4.3 kilograms of cocaine, 2.8 kilograms of heroin, 13.1 kilograms of crystal methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1062 0

2014-RIV-1063 0

2014-RIV-1064 22 7,745 23 77

2014-RIV-1065 18 940 9 91 As a result of this wiretap interception, 22 pounds of methamphetamine was seized, and one arrest made.

2014-RIV-1066 0

2014-RIV-1067 25 4,683 3 97

2014-RIV-1068 50 1,054 18 82

2014-RIV-1070 0

2014-RIV-1071 78 1,334 10 90

2014-RIV-1072 0 0 0 100 Cell phone interception ceased due to line being dropped by target user.

2014-RIV-1073 0

2014-RIV-1074 0

2014-RIV-1075 0 0 1 100

2014-RIV-1076 0

2014-RIV-1078 77 6,029 23 77

As a result of this wiretap interception order, 20 pounds of methamphetamine was seized and four arrests were made. The case is ongoing.

27

Page 31: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1079 0

2014-RIV-1080 0 5 0 100 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 50 pounds of methamphetamine.

2013-RIV-1081 57 2,770 16 84

2014-RIV-1082 0

2014-RIV-1083 0

2014-RIV-1084 10 2,058 11 89

2014-RIV-1085 298 21,486 15 85

2014-RIV-1086 77 3,654 14 86

2014-RIV-1087 4 881 5 95

2014-RIV-1088 118 9,769 7 93 As a result of this wiretap interception order, 5 kilograms of heroin and $346,000 were seized.

2014-RIV-1089 103 3,882 5 95

2014-RIV-1090 320 2,063 5 95

2014-RIV-1091 24 23,278 10 90 See 2014-RIV-1049.

2014-RIV-1092 156 12,062 12 88 No results to report; investigation is ongoing.

2014-RIV-1093 17 1,658 20 80

2014-RIV-1094 10 628 18 82

2014-RIV-1095 133 5,091 1 99

2014-RIV-1096 2,990 5,973 73 27

2014-RIV-1097 180 20,984 9 91

This wiretap interception order provided further intelligence to federal counterparts in South America concerning a large scale cocaine smuggling organization.

2014-RIV-1098 536 8,102 10 90

2014-RIV-1099 0

2014-RIV-1100 7 50 62 38 As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents seized $620,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1101 228 6,632 22 78

2014-RIV-1102 95 1,903 10 90

2014-RIV-1103 50 1,980 15 85 As a result of this wiretap interception order, 10 pounds of heroin was seized and one person was arrested.

28

Page 32: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1104 50 1,893 6 94

Based on intercepted calls, three suspects were arrested and 1 kilogram of cocaine and 1 stolen gun were seized.

2014-RIV-1106 214 10,896 5 95

2014-RIV-1108 33 1,224 14 86

2014-RIV-1109 0

2014-RIV-1110 591 14,781 4 96 As a result of this wiretap interception order, 21.3 kilograms of cocaine and $161,400 were seized.

2014-RIV-1111 61 4,295 7 93

2014-RIV-1112 184 4,025 13 87 As a result of this wiretap interception order, officers were able to seize 5 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1113 55 722 61 39 As a result of this wire interception, $11,780 was seized along with 60 grams of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1114 2 8 0 100

2014-RIV-1115 18 2,795 38 62

2014-RIV-1116 68 2,343 44 56

2014-RIV-1117 89 3,978 1 99 As a result of this wire interception, 25 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1118 24 1,414 2 98

2014-RIV-1119 0

2014-RIV-1120 15 5,667 7 93

2014-RIV-1121 0

2014-RIV-1122 128 3,535 2 98 As a result of this wiretap interception order, agents seized $283,555 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1123 86 2,721 10 90

2014-RIV-1124 1 5 60 40

2014-RIV-1125 24 449 35 65

2014-RIV-1127 83 5,736 17 83 Three people were arrested as a result of this wiretap interception order, and 12 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1128 30 1,057 42 58 As a result of this wire interception, seizures included 1 kilogram of cocaine and 1 stolen gun.

29

Page 33: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1129 17 619 8 92

Interceptions corroborated information on target but illegal activity was infrequent; no drugs or money seized under this wiretap order.

2014-RIV-1130 151 2,729 16 84

2014-RIV-1131 43 6,592 35 65

2013-RIV-1132 4 749 20 80

2014-RIV-1133 0

2014-RIV-1134 68 3,614 25 75

2013-RIV-1135 18 4,751 13 87 As a result of this wire interception, $418,790 was seized.

2014-RIV-1136 92 5,336 12 76 As a result of this wire interception, $35,492 was seized from subjects traveling through multiple states collecting narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1137 0

2014-RIV-1138 35 2,066 6 94

2014-RIV-1139 0

2014-RIV-1141 178 5,866 35 65

2014-RIV-1142 332 528 17 83 As a result of this wire interception, 4 pounds of methamphetamine was seized and two arrests were made.

2014-RIV-1143 11 74

2014-RIV-1144 0

2014-RIV-1145 54 3,543 43 57

2014-RIV-1146 0

2014-RIV-1148 106 6,093 9 91 As a result of this wire interception, 33 kilograms of cocaine, 5 kilograms of heroin, and 7 pounds of methamphetamine were seized.

2014-RIV-1149 20 274 20 80

2014-RIV-1150 56 4,871 6 94 As a result of this wire interception, 11 pounds of heroin and $346,020 were seized.

30

Page 34: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1151 29 1,251 21 79

A retail dealer was identified as a result of this wiretap interception order. Surveillance was conducted at the residence and a search warrant was also served, 100 grams of methamphetamine, 2 firearms (1 stolen), and 9 pounds of marijuana and marijuana wax were located. Four subjects were arrested and are pending prosecution

2014-RIV-1152 0 0 0 0 No calls were intercepted.

2014-RIV-1153 48 1,541 78 22

2014-RIV-1154 199 7,075 24 76

2014-RIV-1155 0

2014-RIV-1156 93 1,786 16 84

2014-RIV-1157 0 29 0 100

2014-RIV-1158 44 944 9 91 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 30 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1160 32 300 6 94

2014-RIV-1161 0 4 0 0 No arrests or seizures were made due to the brevity of this wiretap interception; agents were only able to monitor minimal phone activity.

2014-RIV-1162 51 2,895 4 96

2014-RIV-1163 0 7 0 100 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $109,980 from a drug trafficking organization (DTO) courier.

2014-RIV-1164 39 1,696 3 97

2014-RIV-1165 71 2,231 28 72

This wiretap interception order led to the arrest of two suspects and the seizure of $56,000 in narcotic proceeds and 5 pounds of marijuana.

2014-RIV-1166 4 87 3 97

2014-RIV-1167 116 4,475 22 78

2014-RIV-1168 0

2014-RIV-1169 3 101 19 81

Additional target telephones are currently being intercepted to further this investigation into drug trafficking organization (DTO). See also 2014-RIV-1049.

2014-RIV-1170 0

31

Page 35: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1171 87 999 40 60

2014-RIV-1172 32 2,934 11 89 As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made, and 10 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1173 1 1 0 100

2014-RIV-1174 71 1,887 15 85

2014-RIV-1175 0

2014-RIV-1176 426 4,660 30 70

2013-RIV-1177 49 4,309 8 92

2014-RIV-1178 32 4,395 6 94 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 11 pounds of heroin.

2014-RIV-1179 273 9,418 15 85

2014-RIV-1180 0

2014-RIV-1181 9 1,068 12 88

2014-RIV-1182 0

2014-RIV-1183 149 2,037 8 92

2014-RIV-1184 0

2014-RIV-1185 30 220 22 78 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 11 kilograms of cocaine and 21 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1186 41 931 19 81 As a result of this wire interception, $208,300 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1187 110 4,353 5 95

As a result of this wire interception, numerous intercepted calls proved the subject was directly involved in the DTO and 5 pounds of heroin was seized.

2014-RIV-1188 17 26,917 3 97 See 2014-RIV-1049.

2014-RIV-1190 813 10,700 8 92 As a result of this wire interception, $70,000 in narcotic proceeds, 10 – 1 ounce gold bars, and one vehicle were seized.

2014-RIV-1191 30 763 15 85

2014-RIV-1192 0 7 0 0

2014-RIV-1193 108 4,305 26 74 This wiretap interception order led to the arrest of one person along with the seizure of 343 grams of methamphetamine.

32

Page 36: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1194 87 5,076 55 45

2014-RIV-1195 0 0 0 0 Installed but not used - target telephone accounts were closed for non-payment.

2014-RIV-1196 54 8,672 5 95

2014-RIV-1197 64 1,406 7 93

2014-RIV-1198 67 8,787 60 40

2014-RIV-1199 15 10,282 26 74

2014-RIV-1200 0

2014-RIV-1201 82 3,583 27 73

As a result of this wire interception, numerous calls involving narcotic related trafficking were intercepted, and 1 pound of methamphetamine and $25,500 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1202 100 2,519 15 85

2014-RIV-1203 0 0 0 0

2014-RIV-1204 0

2014-RIV-1205 14 3,867 1 99

2014-RIV-1206 97 4,813 15 85

2014-RIV-1207 152 3,254 4 96

2014-RIV-1208 132 12,802 19 81

2014-RIV-1209 53 1,051 35 65 As a result of this wire interception, 29 pounds of heroin and $20,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1210 0 42 0 100

2014-RIV-1211 31 1,391 49 51 As a result of this wire interception, 10 kilograms of cocaine and 4 pounds of heroin were seized.

2014-RIV-1212 15 251 82 18

2014-RIV-1213 113 1,348 47 53

2014-RIV-1214 38 29,138 42 58

This wiretap interception order resulted in the seizure of undisclosed amount of narcotics and additional intelligence which will be utilized in disrupting the drug trafficking organization (DTO).

33

Page 37: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1215 84 10,581 12 88

As a result of this wire interception, 300 pounds of marijuana in a stash house was seized, four suspects were arrested and new subjects and DTOs were identified.

2014-RIV-1216 101 5,435 10 90 This wiretap interception order assisted detectives in further identification of subjects involved in murder and gang activity.

2014-RIV-1217 141 323 13 87

2014-RIV-1218 83 3,878 62 24

2014-RIV-1219 0

2014-RIV-1220 490 13,486 17 83 As a result of this wire interception, $2,245,661 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1221 55 139 33 67

2014-RIV-1222 2 1,121 23 77

2014-RIV-1223 0

2014-RIV-1224 105 3,913 2 98

2014-RIV-1225 5 102 16 84

2014-RIV-1226 471 2,115 12 88

2014-RIV-1227 0

2014-RIV-1229 48 6,501 11 89 As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made and 1 pound of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1231 189 6,500 17 83 As a result of this wire interception, $20,000 in narcotic proceeds, 5.6 ounces of cocaine, and 2 firearms were seized.

2014-RIV-1232 14 100 25 75

2014-RIV-1233 149 5,406 3 97

2014-RIV-1234 0

2014-RIV-1235 35 1,056 24 76

As a result of this wire interception, 20 kilograms of cocaine,11 pounds of heroin, 5 pounds of methamphetamine, and $39,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1236 103 11,218 8 92

2014-RIV-1237 8 1,936 11 89 As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made, and 25 kilograms of cocaine was seized.

2014-RIV-1238 2 4,637 0 100

34

Page 38: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1239 53 7,139 4 96

2014-RIV-1240 289 5,127 8 92

As a result of this wire interception, one arrest was made and 12.5 pounds of methamphetamine and 244 pounds of marijuana were seized.

2014-RIV-1241 100 26,480 17 83

2014-RIV-1242 0

2014-RIV-1243 174 3,252 13 87

2014-RIV-1244 111 5,119 7 93

2014-RIV-1245 6 223 80 20

2014-RIV-1246 0

2014-RIV-1247 6 80 30 70

2014-RIV-1248 0

2014-RIV-1249 107 2,392 22 78

2014-RIV-1250 51 1,693 7 93

2014-RIV-1251 35 2,048 25 75

2014-RIV-1252 59 255 16 84

2014-RIV-1253 8 32 34 66

2014-RIV-1254 617 3,452 10 90 As a result of this wire interception, $100,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1255 8 38 58 42

2014-RIV-1256 496 9,946 18 82 As a result of this wire interception, $180,000 in narcotic proceeds and 12 pounds of heroin were seized.

2014-RIV-1257 15 545 7 93

As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to further identify all suspects and subjects involved in the murder with additional gang affiliation admissions.

2014-RIV-1258 0

2014-RIV-1259 0

2014-RIV-1260 0

2014-RIV-1261 22 1,608 10 90

2014-RIV-1262 122 2,153 7 93

2014-RIV-1263 41 24,031 42 58 See 2014-RIV-1049.

35

Page 39: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1264 0

2014-RIV-1265 0

2014-RIV-1266 67 2,115 17 83

2014-RIV-1267 0

2014-RIV-1268 26 2,357 30 70

2014-RIV-1269 108 7,818 13 87

2014-RIV-1270 19 2,065 15 85

2014-RIV-1271 0 4 0 100

2014-RIV-1272 31 3,719 15 85 As a result of this wire interception, 18 kilograms of cocaine and 16 kilograms of heroin were seized.

2014-RIV-1273 0

2014-RIV-1275 37 5,273 12 88

2014-RIV-1276 89 3,392 21 79

2014-RIV-1277 305 18,395 15 85

As a result of this wire interception, numerous narcotic trafficking related calls were intercepted, two search warrants were served and $20,741 in suspected drug proceeds was seized along with 2 firearms and 5.6 ounces of cocaine. One person was arrested on drug trafficking related charges.

2014-RIV-1278 103 4,195 13 87

2014-RIV-1280 0

2014-RIV-1281 34 534 37 63

2014-RIV-1282 0 0 0 100

2014-RIV-1283 59 2,591 10 90

2014-RIV-1284 11 5,155 10 90

2014-RIV-1285 205 4,153 11 89

2014-RIV-1286 0

2014-RIV-1287 18 220 80 20 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 7 pounds of methamphetamine and the arrest of two subjects.

2014-RIV-1288 113 219 38 62

36

Page 40: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1289 315 4,027 28 72

As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to seize $1.16 million in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1290 163 7,741 45 55 As a result of this wire interception, $71,879 and 2 kilograms of cocaine were seized and two arrests were made.

2014-RIV-1291 0 0 Installed but not used, no calls were intercepted.

2014-RIV-1292 0

2014-RIV-1293 9 276 4 96 Interceptions from this wiretap order resulted in the seizure of $20,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1294 0

2013-RIV-1295 65 7,534 37 63

2014-RIV-1296 1 10 10 90

2014-RIV-1297 13 77 32 68

2014-RIV-1298 79 2,781 11 89

2014-RIV-1299 9 86 86 14

2014-RIV-1300 102 1,372 17 83

As a result of this wiretap interception, a search warrant was subsequently served. Methamphetamine and heroin were seized and the subject was arrested and released pending further investigation and prosecution.

2014-RIV-1301 0

2014-RIV-1302 156 7,227 30 70

2014-RIV-1303 9 703 25 75

2014-RIV-1304 0

2014-RIV-1305 48 496 36 64

2014-RIV-1306 1 2 0 100

2014-RIV-1307 12 362 7 93

2014-RIV-1308 0

2014-RIV-1309 42 15,964 46 54 See 2014-RIV-1049.

2014-RIV-1310 0

2014-RIV-1311 0

2014-RIV-1312 0

2014-RIV-1313 18 132 10 90

37

Page 41: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1315 24 1,466 32 68

2014-RIV-1316 67 8,468 40 60 As a result of this wire interception, additional subjects and the drug trafficking organization’s structure were identified.

2014-RIV-1317 655 2,921 17 83 As a result of this wire interception, $1.2 million in narcotic proceeds, 5 vehicles, and gold valued at $79,650 were seized.

2014-RIV-1319 11 1,464 1 99

2014-RIV-1320 142 3,283 15 85 As a result of this wire interception, 21.74 grams of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1321 0 0

2014-RIV-1322 196 8,264 5 95 As a result of this wire interception, communications assisted with surveillance operations and led to narcotic seizures and arrests.

2014-RIV-1323 0

2014-RIV-1324 156 4,279 19 81

As a result of this wire interception, two arrests were made and the seizure of 2.5 pounds of methamphetamine, 2 pounds of cocaine, $46,400 in narcotic proceeds, and 6 guns.

2014-RIV-1326 0

2014-RIV-1327 0 0 Installed but not used, subject dumped phone.

2014-RIV-1328 0

2014-RIV-1329 209 7,576 15 85

2014-RIV-1330 73 1,096 16 84

2014-RIV-1331 0

2014-RIV-1332 560 3,707 5 95

2014-RIV-1333 0 11 0 100 As a result of this wire interception, $210,698 in narcotic proceeds and 8 firearms were seized.

2014-RIV-1334 5 2,023 7 93

2014-RIV-1335 0

2014-RIV-1336 48 3,585 30 70

2014-RIV-1337 22 103 52 48

38

Page 42: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1338 33 2,470 12 88

As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 26 pounds of methamphetamine and 3 kilograms of cocaine.

2014-RIV-1339 115 3,365 7 93

This wiretap interception order was necessary to investigate a Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO). Intel was gained for a future enforcement action which will disrupt the DTO.

2014-RIV-1340 23 2,679 14 86 As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested and 86 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1341 30 444 54 46

2014-RIV-1342 18 512 30 70 Additional subjects and DTO were identified; no arrests or seizures were made.

2014-RIV-1343 142 3,283 15 85 See 2014-RIV-1320.

2014-RIV-1344 78 23,191 20 80

2014-RIV-1345 113 82,272 9 91

2014-RIV-1346 37 976 26 74 As a result of this wire interception, 1 pound of marijuana and $36,805 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1347 0

2014-RIV-1348 62 1,378 53 47 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 908 grams of methamphetamine and 136 grams of marijuana.

2014-RIV-1349 0

2014-RIV-1350 0

2014-RIV-1351 109 1,944 18 82

2014-RIV-1352 7 116 49 51 As a result of this wire interception, $160,012 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1353 102 4,156 14 86

2014-RIV-1354 37 2,988 8 92 As a result of this wire interception, 5.6 pounds of methamphetamine and $101,095 were seized.

2014-RIV-1355 0

2014-RIV-1356 0

2014-RIV-1357 8 556 34 66 One subject was arrested. See 2014-RIV-1320.

2014-RIV-1358 10 119 51 49

39

Page 43: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1359 2 3 0 100

This target telephone was used sparingly; no incriminating interceptions.

2014-RIV-1360 113 2,573 60 40 As a result of this wiretap interception order, $221,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1361 23 204 7 93 As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to seize $300,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1362 159 1,753 27 73 As a result of this wire interception, $505,880, $42,100, $60,000 and $25,000 in narcotic proceeds were seized at various locations.

2014-RIV-1363 200 8,847 5 95

2014-RIV-1364 611 35,139 20 80

As a result of this wire interception, numerous calls involving narcotics trafficking were discussed at length and 27.7 pounds of methamphetamine, 3 pounds of black tar heroin, 2 firearms, and $7,791 in suspected drug proceeds were seized from residences and traffic stops.

2014-RIV-1365 143 2,437 12 88

2014-RIV-1366 260 6,163 15 85

2014-RIV-1367 0

2014-RIV-1368 65 4,075 25 75

2014-RIV-1369 238 3,324 7 93

2014-RIV-1370 28 3,464 27 73 Information derived from this wiretap interception order resulted in two arrests and the seizure of 5 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1371 100 1,996

As a result of this wire interception, agents were able to further identify additional cocaine and methamphetamine couriers associated with the drug trafficking organization (DTO).

2014-RIV-1372 18 553 33 67

2014-RIV-1373 379 10,693 20 80

2014-RIV-1374 39 41,344 37 63

2014-RIV-1375 12 352 14 86

2014-RIV-1376 711 4,967 20 80

40

Page 44: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1377 50 4,775 33 67

The interception order assisted agents in further identifying the structure of the DTO.

2014-RIV-1378 0 0 0 100

2014-RIV-1379 16 305 40 60 As a result of this wire interception, $36,805 and 2 pounds of marijuana were seized.

2014-RIV-1380 4 698 23 77

2014-RIV-1381 0 1 0 100

2014-RIV-1382 0 17

2014-RIV-1383 7 1,536 20 80

2014-RIV-1384 0

2014-RIV-1385 0

2014-RIV-1386 10 193 27 73

Information derived from this wiretap interception order resulted in three arrests and the seizure of 7 kilograms of heroin and 4 kilograms of cocaine.

2014-RIV-1387 214 4,147 14 86

2014-RIV-1388 54 3,494 48 52

2014-RIV-1389 0

2014-RIV-1390 75 1,073 43 57

2014-RIV-1392 0 2 0 100

2014-RIV-1393 44 904 16 84

2014-RIV-1394 0

2014-RIV-1395 45 2,501 23 77

2014-RIV-1396 0

2014-RIV-1398 24 516 15 85 The subject discontinued using this phone.

2014-RIV-1399 55 3,482 7 93

2014-RIV-1400 27 4,942 4 96 The subject discontinued using this phone.

2014-RIV-1401 0

2014-RIV-1402 0

2014-RIV-1403 105 3,175 25 75 Intercepted communications resulted in the seizure of 31 pounds of methamphetamine and one arrest.

41

Page 45: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1404 0

2014-RIV-1405 126 924 40 60

As a result of this wire interception, narcotic proceeds were seized at various locations in the amounts of: $70,000; $170,000; $180,000; and $1.4 million.

2014-RIV-1406 554 9,504 13 87 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $22,433 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1407 9 649 30 70

2014-RIV-1408 36 15,486 22 78

As a result of this wire interception, investigators identified other associates and stash residences. The interception also led to the seizure of 4 kilograms of cocaine and 5 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1409 0 0 0 100

2014-RIV-1410 32 2,015 22 78

2014-RIV-1411 105 3,232 40 60

2014-RIV-1412 2 20 20 80

2014-RIV-1413 15 3,661 27 73

2014-RIV-1414 66 924 30 70

2014-RIV-1415 7 248 40 60

2014-RIV-1416 0

2014-RIV-1417 86 3,246 15 85 The interception led to the arrest and seizure of 4 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-RIV-1418 32 2,346 15 85

2014-RIV-1419 0

2014-RIV-1420 0

2014-RIV-1421 109 1,090 52 48

2014-RIV-1423 0

2014-RIV-1424 37 738 22 78 Interceptions from this wiretap order led to the arrest of two individuals and the seizure of 2 compartmented vehicles.

2014-RIV-1425 7 1,197 52 48

42

Page 46: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1426 27 21,267 74 26

As a result of this wire interception, agents seized 26.2 kilograms of heroin, 464.18 kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine, and $507,680 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1427 222 1,425 13 87

2014-RIV-1428 35 2,781 12 88

2014-RIV-1429 11 458 81 19

2014-RIV-1430 0

2014-RIV-1431 0

2014-RIV-1432 159 2,983 22 78

2014-RIV-1433 17 465 1 99

2014-RIV-1434 3 6 33 67

2014-RIV-1435 0 0

2014-RIV-1436 156 8,261 44 56 As a result of this wire interception, $122,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized from a residence.

2014-RIV-1437 28 3,112 2 98

2014-RIV-1438 7 428 8 92

2014-RIV-1439 29 2,354 15 85

2014-RIV-1440 124 72,602 30 70 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of $750,000 in narcotic proceeds and 6 kilograms of heroin.

2014-RIV-1441 23 980 18 82

2014-RIV-1442 0

2014-RIV-1443 0 0 0 0 Phone was discarded by subject.

2014-RIV-1444 16 1,710 1 99

2014-RIV-1445 2 2 2 98

2014-RIV-1446 14 1,901 16 84 As a result of this wire interception, , $152,823 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1447 10 614 60 40 As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested, and $176,493 in narcotic proceeds and 6 kilograms of cocaine were seized.

2014-RIV-1449 70 777 21 79 As a result of this wire interception, 13 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1451 0

43

Page 47: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1452 23 549 1 99

2014-RIV-1453 2 1 0 100

2014-RIV-1455 540 3,801 17 83 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $485,893 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1456 0

2014-RIV-1457 30 603 33 67

Interceptions led to the identification and authoring of wiretap affidavits for multiple other individuals associated with the drug trafficking organization.

2014-RIV-1458 61 1,313 32 68 As a result of this wire interception, 2 kilograms of cocaine was seized.

2014-RIV-1459 137 3,475 10 90 As a result of this wire interception, $320,000 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1460 56 977 5 95

2014-RIV-1461 7 1,416 3 97 This wiretap led to more intercepts which resulted in multiple seizures of narcotics and money from narcotics proceeds.

2014-RIV-1463 7 875 34 66 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $382,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1464 10 2,280 13 87 As a result of this wire interception, two people were arrested, and $152,823 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1466 107 5,674 8 92

The listed subject discontinued using the target telephone. As a result of a seizure, agents seized 5 kilograms of cocaine along with 2 vehicles, and four people were arrested on drug charges.

2014-RIV-1467 115 3,115 6 94 This interception led to the seizure of one handgun.

2014-RIV-1468 38 2,867 9 91

2014-RIV-1470 70 1,665 19 81

This wiretap interception order led to the identification of two sources of supply, customers, and couriers operating within the drug trafficking organization.

2014-RIV-1471 79 1,710 11 89

2014-RIV-1472 0

2014-RIV-1473 0

2014-RIV-1474 78 3,869 8 92

44

Page 48: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1475 0 18 0 100

2014-RIV-1476 9 381 40 60 As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested, and 8 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-RIV-1477 1 43 9 91

2014-RIV-1478 0 This intercept was not installed.

2014-RIV-1479 0

2014-RIV-1480 41 3,100 56 44

2014-RIV-1481 29 3,943 4 96

2014-RIV-1482 1 59 0 100

2014-RIV-1483 39 8,253 5 95

2013-RIV-1484 39 2,272 5 95

2014-RIV-1485 327 6,089 33 67 This wiretap interception led to the seizure of 14 pounds of methamphetamine and a handgun, and one person was arrested.

2014-RIV-1486 28 55,328 46 54

As a result of this wire interception, 26.2 kilograms of heroin, 474.24 kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine and $507,680 in narcotic proceeds were seized.

2014-RIV-1487 134 22,459 9 91 As a result of this wire interception, 46 kilograms of cocaine and one vehicle were seized, and one person was arrested.

2014-RIV-1488 0

2014-RIV-1489 67 2,371 35 65

2014-RIV-1490 32 3,288 16 84

2014-RIV-1491 0

2014-RIV-1492 7 4,236 27 73

2014-RIV-1493 84 1,961 15 85

2014-RIV-1494 36 848 23 77 As a result of this wire interception, agents seized $100,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1495 44 3,567 9 91

2014-RIV-1496 0

2014-RIV-1497 0

45

Page 49: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1498 40 993 30 70 Interceptions led to the seizure of

$279,850 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1499 116 3,746 9 91 As a result of this wire interception, $60,500 in suspected narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1500 0

2014-RIV-1501 86 6,816 25 75

2014-RIV-1502 0

2014-RIV-1503 64 3,360 7 93 This wiretap interception order led to the seizure of 13 pounds of methamphetamine and $60,400 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1504 13 122 7 93 As a result of this wire interception, 2 kilograms of cocaine and $21,563 were seized.

2014-RIV-1505 44 731 37 63

2014-RIV-1506 47 1,666 24 76

2014-RIV-1507 0

2014-RIV-1508 227 1,631 32 68

2014-RIV-1510 3 345 1 99

2014-RIV-1511 79 489 62 68

2014-RIV-1512 0

2014-RIV-1513 15 8,024 7 93 During this period of interceptions, agents seized a mixture of 200 pounds of heroin and 60 pounds of cocaine.

2014-RIV-1514 32 750 49 51 As a result of this wire interception, $308,710 and 3 kilograms of cocaine were seized.

2014-RIV-1515 18 8,967 10 90 As a result of this wire interception, three people were arrested, and 60 pounds of marijuana and 5 firearms were seized.

2014-RIV-1516 55 1,628 12 88 As a result of this wire interception, 3 pounds of methamphetamine and one vehicle was seized, and one arrest was made.

2014-RIV-1517 71 1,596 6 94

2014-RIV-1518 0

2014-RIV-1519 11 167 8 92

46

Page 50: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1520 186 7,939 14 86

As a result of this wire interception, two people were arrested and 4 pounds of methamphetamine and 1 kilogram of cocaine were seized.

2014-RIV-1521 5 357 56 44

As a result of this wire interception, 26 kilograms of heroin, 474 kilograms of cocaine, 8.55 kilograms of methamphetamine, and $507,680 were seized.

2014-RIV-1522 65 988 22 78 Interceptions assisted in the seizure of $279,805 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1523 28 4,307 52 48

2014-RIV-1524 0

2014-RIV-1525 230 3,119 5 95

2014-RIV-1526 112 830 5 95

2014-RIV-1527 34 2,277 12 88 As a result of this wire interception, 5 kilograms of cocaine was seized, and four arrests were made.

2014-RIV-1528 65 1,400 33 67 Interceptions led to the identification of additional telephone numbers of associates of the drug trafficking organization (DTO).

2014-RIV-1529 113 2,993 28 72

2014-RIV-1530 0

2014-RIV-1533 31 746 7 93

2014-RIV-1534 0

2014-RIV-1535 1 212 1 99

2014-RIV-1538 9 2,437 17 83

2014-RIV-1539 20 4,097 31 69

2014-RIV-1540 1 22 0 100

2014-RIV-1541 23 222 52 48

2014-RIV-1542 4 348 7 93

2014-RIV-1544 4 645 1 99

2014-RIV-1545 0

2014-RIV-1546 0

2014-RIV-1547 0

2014-RIV-1549 0

47

Page 51: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1550 43 1,890 38 62

As a result of this wire interception, two arrests were made and $308,710 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1551 0 9 0 100

2014-RIV-1552 0

2014-RIV-1553 7 283 15 85

2014-RIV-1554 0

2014-RIV-1555 175 7,110 18 82 As a result of this wire interception, 10 ounces of heroin and 2 kilograms of cocaine were seized.

2014-RIV-1557 31 633 11 89

2014-RIV-1558 159 8,898 10 90

2014-RIV-1559 0 152 0 100 No activity to report.

2014-RIV-1561 0

2014-RIV-1563 45 1,793 13 87

2014-RIV-1565 90 4,537 11 89

2014-RIV-1568 11 222 68 32 As a result of this wire interception, $493,978 in narcotic proceeds was seized.

2014-RIV-1569 5 307 5 95

2014-RIV-1570 0

2014-RIV-1571 25 262 36 64 As a result of this wire interception, $308,710 and 3 kilograms of cocaine were seized, and two arrests were made.

2014-RIV-1572 27 1,492 8 92 As a result of this wire interception, $308,710 in narcotic proceeds and 3 kilograms of cocaine were seized.

2014-RIV-1573 0

2014-RIV-1574 0

2014-RIV-1575 0

2014-RIV-1576 31 70,685 23 77

This wiretap interception order assisted in the seizure of 26 kilograms of heroin, 474 kilograms of cocaine, 8 kilograms of methamphetamine, and $539,202 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-RIV-1577 0

2014-RIV-1581 0 Installed but not used.

48

Page 52: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1582 0

2014-RIV-1586 12 49 33 67

2014-RIV-1587 0

2014-RIV-1589 2 38 0 100

Sacramento 2014-SAC-54 213 5,131 17 83 The intel received from the wiretap was valuable to further the investigation of an unsolved murder of an officer.

2014-SAC-56 45 732 4 96 Disposition of these defendants is still pending in Sacramento County.

2014-SAC-57 2 482 28 72

As a result of this wire interception, 38 pounds of cocaine, 8 pounds of methamphetamine, 6 pounds of heroin, 5 firearms, and $360,000 in drug proceeds were seized. Investigation concluded in San Joaquin and is being prosecuted there.

2014-SAC-59 3 1,513 29 71 See 2014-SAC-57.

2014-SAC-60 9 9,821 4 96

As a result of this wire interception, detectives received crucial items of evidence through communications. All three defendants are pending murder and attempted murder charges.

2014-SAC-61 4 772 92 8 See 2014-SAC-57.

San Bernardino 2014-SBD-538 31 390 71 29

2014-SBD-539 22 160 22 78

2014-SBD-540 13 135 89 11

As a result of this wire interception, $68,000 in narcotic proceeds, 63 pounds of methamphetamine and one firearm were seized, and one arrest was made.

2014-SBD-542 95 1,484 19 81 The phone was changed prior to arrests and seizures.

2014-SBD-543 2,102 5,126 10 90

2014-SBD-544 5 1,965 38 62 Other subjects have been identified and this case is ongoing.

2014-SBD-545 47 5,859 15 85

2014-SBD-546 201 13,228 5 95 As a result of this wire interception, 8 kilograms of heroin and $20,000.00 were seized.

49

Page 53: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

San Bernardino (cont’d) 2014-SBD-547 127 13,028 5 95

As part of an ongoing murder investigation, three suspects had been identified. A multiagency task force that assisted with a local authorities obtained evidence against the perpetrators, their co-conspirators, aiders and abettors. The content of the intercepted communications confirmed the identity of three suspects, who were members of a criminal street gang, and who were subsequently arrested. Two out of the three were charged with murder.

2014-SBD-548 368 12,025 19 81 As a result of this wire interception, 10 pounds of opium (Mexican Brown) was seized as well as $91,000 in narcotic proceeds.

2014-SBD-549 0 112 0 100

2014-SBD-550 4 758 17 83

2014-SBD-551 154 3,154 13 87

The wire intercept was conducted after exhausting leads on a gang-related murder and allowed investigators to obtain incriminating evidence sufficient for charges to be filed on the offenses of murder, attempted murder, participation in a criminal street gang, and accessory to murder on seven defendants.

2014-SBD-552 114 2,133 23 77 As a result of this wire interception, 3 kilograms of heroin and $91,000 were seized, and one person was arrested.

2014-SBD-553 616 7,604 21 79 As a result of this wire interception, 20 kilograms of heroin and $200,000 were seized, and five people were arrested.

2014-SBD-554 99 1,842 4 96

As a result of this wire interception, 18 pounds of methamphetamine, 4 kilograms of heroin and $56,000 were seized, and four people were arrested.

2014-SBD-555 5 87 19 81 As a result of this wire interception, 10 kilograms of cocaine and 1 pound of methamphetamine were seized.

2014-SBD-557 1,299 3,333 6 94 No seizures were based off of these intercepts.

2014-SBD-558 90 1,203 24 76 As a result of this wire interception, 2 pounds of methamphetamine and 4 kilograms of heroin were seized, and two arrests were made.

50

Page 54: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) San Bernardino

(cont’d) 2014-SBD-559 37 423 22 78 See 2014-SBD-559.

2014-SBD-560 33 4,307 4 96

Subject discontinued using this phone after his arrest. Agents seized 21 pounds of methamphetamine and $30,000 from the subject. Agents will file criminal charges on the subject at the termination of this case.

2014-SBD-561 26 325 13 87

As a result of this wire interception, the suspect was arrested on suspicion of committing multiple murders. The arrest concluded a four year investigation spanning multiple counties.

2014-SBD-562 29 224 16 84

As a result of these interceptions, investigators seized 8 pounds of heroin, 1 pound of methamphetamine, 1 handgun, and $52,000 in narcotic proceeds. These seizures are significant amounts of narcotics and have a direct impact on the community.

2014-SBD-563 72 7,818 2 98 The subjects were believed to be using additional telephones for their criminal activity. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-SBD-564 126 4,086 2 98 See 2014-SBD-561.

2014-SBD-566 70 751 40 60

2014-SBD-567 37 6,862 1 99 The subject was believed to be using an additional telephone for his criminal activity. The investigation is ongoing.

2014-SBD-569 35 238 31 69

2014-SBD-570 0 There have been no seizures directly related to this wiretap, however, other subjects have been identified and this case is ongoing.

2014-SBD-571 80 1,437 17 83

San Diego 2014-SD-180 46 1,131 49 51

During the course of wire intercepts, agents seized 18 pounds of methamphetamine and 1 kilogram of cocaine, and agents arrested three individuals and anticipate two more arrests.

51

Page 55: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

San Diego (cont’d) 2014-SD-181 103 23,001 8 92

This was a federal agency investigation into a Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO) specializing in the importation, transportation, and distribution of multi-pound quantities of cocaine and methamphetamine from Mexicali, Mexico to several cities in the United States and Canada. During the course of the investigation, agents seized 12.56 kilograms of cocaine, 3.36 kilograms of heroin, and 3 guns. Investigation includes wires 13-17 (EICOS 2013-SD-170), 13-18 and 14-02 (EICOS 2014-SD-194).

2014-SD-182 305 11,015 19 81

2014-SD-183 106 5,295 22 78

2014-SD-185 5 65 18 82

Subjects were members of an international drug trafficking network responsible for distributing multiple pound quantities of methamphetamine within San Diego County. Investigation led to the seizure of 8 pounds of methamphetamine, the conviction of nine co-conspirators, and the identification of higher ranking members of the organization. Investigation included wires 14-03 and 14-07.

2014-SD-186 78 1,707 84 16

2014-SD-187 118 12,764 14 86

2014-SD-188 0 0 0 0

The intercepts of target phone numbers provided agents with information about narcotic smuggling throughout the United States. During the course of this on-going investigation, agents seized 21.4 pounds of methamphetamine, 49.7 pounds of marijuana, 10 grams of heroin, and $500 in narcotic proceeds. Investigation included wires 14-06, 14-10 and 14-13.

2014-SD-189 138 4,397 37 63

52

Page 56: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

San Diego (cont’d) 2014-SD-190 165 4,878 8 92

The wire enabled federal agents to further infiltrate the DTO and dismantle the organization responsible for distributing multi-kilograms of narcotics in Southern California. During the investigation, agents seized 41 pounds of cocaine and 1.5 pounds of methamphetamine. Investigation included wires 14-05, 14-08 and 14-12.

2014-SD-191 57 263 0 100

This investigation involved efforts to solve a double murder that occurred in 1996. The investigation included wires 14-01 and 14-11. It did not result in any arrests.

2014-SD-192 217 13,066 4 96

Investigation into the drug trafficking activities of a Mexico-based drug trafficking organization (DTO) involved in the importation, transportation, and distribution of large, multiple pound quantities of methamphetmine into San Diego County. Additionally, the DTO coordinates the laundering of monetary proceeds from the narcotic sales through money pick-ups and bank account deposits made throughout the United States. Investigation includes wires 14-04 and 14-09.

2014-SD-193 120 33,551 27 46

2014-SD-195 57 540 7 93 See 2014-SD-191.

San Joaquin 2015-SJ-36 208 16,620 2 98 Intercepts were used to prosecute a criminal street gang for robbery, narcotics, and human trafficking.

2015-SJ-37 0 Wire intercepts were used for a murder investigation.

2015-SJ-38 0 Wire intercepts were used for a murder investigation.

2015-SJ-39 0 Wire intercepts were used for a murder investigation.

2015-SJ-40 0

2015-SJ-41 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang.

2015-SJ-42 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang.

2015-SJ-43 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang.

2015-SJ-44 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a criminal street gang.

53

Page 57: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) San Joaquin

(cont’d) 2015-SJ-45 0 Wire intercepts were used to prosecute a criminal street gang.

2015-SJ-46 111 1,014 37 63 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide investigation.

2015-SJ-47 0 Wire intercepts were used to prosecute a criminal street gang.

2015-SJ-48 0 Intercepts were used in an investigation of a bank robbery murder involving hostages.

2015-SJ-49 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution.

2015-SJ-50 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution.

2015-SJ-51 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution.

2015-SJ-52 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution.

2015-SJ-53 0 Wire intercepts were used to investigate a homicide prosecution.

Santa Barbara 2014-SBA-46 59 711 8.5 91

The interception was directed at two suspects in a murder. The year long investigation had exhausted investigative techniques. The wire was intended to capture co-conspirator statements regarding the murder that could not otherwise be obtained.

2014-SBA-47 1,639 1 99

2014-SBA-48 181 24 76

2014-SBA-49 3,069 32 68

Santa Clara 2014-SCL-71 27 729 23 77

This investigation involved a cold case homicide that occurred in 1989. The wire was used to intercept calls between the two suspects. The investigation was reopened in 2012 with a DNA hit. Intercepted calls revealed important facts and admissions. The investigation is ongoing by the District Attorney's Office.

2014-SCL-72 51 708 40 60 See WT 14-01 for a summary of the investigation.

2014-SCL-74 124 1,873 23 77 See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13.

2014-SCL-75 13 171 71 29 See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13.

54

Page 58: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Santa Clara (cont’d) 2014-SCL-76 76 1,295 32 68

This investigation (WT 12-15, 12-16, 12-19, 13-06, 13-08, 13-09, 13-11, 13-13, 14-02, 14-04, 14-05, 14-06 and 14-07) led to the dismantling of this drug trafficking organization (DTO) being sourced directly from Mexico and distributing narcotics all the way up to Canada. This investigation led to the arrest of 22 individuals, $150,000 in asset seizures, and the seizure of 9 firearms, a methamphetamine conversion lab, a butane hash oil lab, 14 pounds of heroin, 24 pounds of methamphetamine, 8 gallons of liquid methamphetamine, 15 pounds of cocaine, and 60 pounds of processed marijuana.

2014-SCL-77 23 129 10 90 See 2014-SCL-76.

2014-SCL-78 51 109 73 27 See 2014-SCL-76.

2014-SCL-79 173 3,577 11 89 See 2014-SCL-76.

2014-SCL-80 88 2,112 45 55 See 2014-SCL-76.

2014-SCL-81 74 3,006 28 72 See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13.

2014-SCL-82 14 152 51 49 See WT 14-08, 14-09, 14-10, 14-11 and 14-13.

2014-SCL-83 73 1,952 38 62

This is a pending investigation into a gang and narcotics distribution operation. Arrests have been effectuated, but more are imminent. Substantial quantities of cocaine, cocaine base, methamphetamine, and marijuana have been seized. In addition, two drug labs and multiple firearms have been uncovered.

2014-SCL-84 249 5,387 13 87

The wiretap solidified a case involving multiple bank robberies and arrest warrants were issued. When search warrants were executed, a handgun was located along with 2 ballistic vests, cell phones, cell phone records, and paperwork were located in various locations along with clothing that linked suspects to the robberies.

Sonoma 2014-SON-6 40 875 10 90

Police in a homicide investigation obtained additional evidence to corroborate DNA evidence found at the scene to the perpetrator of the murder.

55

Page 59: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%)

Sonoma (cont’d) 2014-SON-7 27 147 10 90

Wire interceptions provided critical information as to persons involved in a cold case homicide investigation from 1992.

Stanislaus 2014-STA-63 14 1,006 12.8 21

The wire interceptions allowed a federal and county task force to seize 815 grams of crystal methamphetamine, 163 grams of cocaine and $95,564.15 in assets from a drug trafficking organization (DTO). The intercepts assisted in the arrests of five individuals and the closure of a business that was used to distribute crystal methamphetamine.. To date, one member of the DTO has been convicted and hearings and trials for the other four members are pending.

2014-STA-64 2 0 0 71 See results reported on 14-07.

2014-STA-65 65 831 19 19 See results reported on 14-01.

2014-STA-67 211 5,666 4.5 94.5 Intercept led to the arrest of two people for a gang related homicide.

2014-STA-68 12 150 9 52 See results reported for 14-01.

2014-STA-69 80 916 26.3 74

This interception of drug related phone calls enables law enforcement to dismantle and disrupt drug trade organizations and reduce violent gang activity associated with drug deals.

2014-STA-70 133 1,970 21 36

Wire interception resulted in the dismantling of a drug smuggling cartel operating from Mexico to Northern California, 700 pounds of methamphetamine was seized and three federally indicted suspects are still at large.

2014-STA-71 9 66 22.3 27.7 See results shown on 14-08.

2014-STA-72 17 118 13.4 16.4 See results reported on 14-08.

2014-STA-73 42 4,720 3.6 53.1 See results reports on 14-08.

2014-STA-74 30 2,016 7 43.8 See results reported on 14-08.

2014-STA-75 17 651 9.5 67.8 See results reported on 14-08.

2014-STA-76 30 1,853 11.7 65 See results reported in 14-08.

2014-STA-77 26 1,010 8.9 71.7 See results reported in 14-08.

Tulare 2014-TUL-8 3 84

2014-TUL-9 7 309

56

Page 60: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Tulare (cont’d) 2014-TUL-10 38 4,221

2014-TUL-11 70 4,391

2014-TUL-12 68 3,348

2014-TUL-13 14 386 As a result of this wire interception, 1 pound of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-TUL-14 47 1,179

2014-TUL-15 69 7,523 As a result of this wire interception, 1 pound of methamphetamine was seized.

2014-TUL-16 63 1,294

2014-TUL-18 2,037 262

During this time frame, three subjects were arrested and are pending charges. A total of 2 pounds of methamphetamine was seized.

2015-TUL-19 0 0 During this time frame, there were no phone calls made on this target telephone.

Ventura 2013-VE-74 326 19,149 9 91

Detectives located a methamphetamine conversion lab and recovered 26 pounds of methamphetamine and 4 liters of liquid methamphetamine. Detectives also interdicted heroin and methamphetamine being transited through Ventura County.

2014-VE-84 427 95,415 14 86

2014-VE-85 428 20,683 12 88

2014-VE-86 328 211,492 6 94

2014-VE-87 15 389 7 93

2014-VE-88 179 22,388 4 96

2014-VE-89 70 4,236 14 86

Investigation led to discovery of a methamphetamine recovery and conversion lab, liquid methamphetamine, and 26 pounds of methamphetamine.

2014-VE-90 64 4,469 11 89

Gang members were committing residential burglaries of homes belonging to people of Indian ethnicity based upon a cultural tendency to possess gold. The money generated from the burglaries was used to further the criminal activities of the gang.

57

Page 61: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 4 Description of Communications Obtained and

Usefulness of Electronic Interceptions During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Approximate No. of Persons

Whose Communications Were Intercepted

Total No. of Communications

Intercepted

Nature & Frequency (Penal Code 629.62(9)) Comments on Usefulness of

Intercept3 Incriminating Communications

(%)

Other Communications

(%) Ventura (cont’d) 2014-VE-91 136 5,650 20 80

2014-VE-92 4 286 3 97

2014-VE-93 120 3,490 9 91

Defendants conspired with a confidential informant to murder a perceived informant. The murder was to be funded with the proceeds from an identity theft scheme.

2014-VE-94 185 17,789 12 88

2014-VE-95 489 36,375 16 84

2014-VE-96 569 18,681 7 93

2014-VE-97 92 3,911 14 86

2014-VE-98 28 1,276 26 74

2014-VE-99 806 36,375 6 94

Primary subject of gang-related drug dealing and extortion wiretap investigation was murdered on second day of interception. Wiretap led to information regarding the murder.

2014-VE-100 88 4,037 17 83

2014-VE-101 213 14,332 7 93

2014-VE-102 66 2,937 20 80

Heroin and methamphetamine were seized in a vehicle which crossed the US/Mexico border and drove directly to Ventura County. Multiple pounds of methamphetamine was recovered from stash house in San Bernardino County.

2014-VE-103 1,111 45,207 7 93

2014-VE-104 62 1,387 28 72

2014-VE-105 62 2,340 5 95

2014-VE-106 334 9,944 5 95

2014-VE-109 4 16 19 81

2014-VE-110 53 6,733 54 46

2014-VE-111 43 474 16 84

2014-VE-113 62 684 25 75

58

Page 62: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Alameda 2014-ALA-19 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/24/2015 12/18/2014

2014-ALA-20 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/24/2015 12/18/2014

2014-ALA-24 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/18/2014

2014-ALA-28 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

2014-ALA-29 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

2014-ALA-30 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

2014-ALA-31 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

2014-ALA-32 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

2014-ALA-33 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

2014-ALA-34 O'Malley, DA Hon. Rolefson 3/16/2015 1/9/2015

Contra Costa 2014-CO-1 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 10/17/2014 9/13/2014

2014-CO-2 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 1/20/2015

2014-CC-8 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 4/21/2014 10/9/2014

2014-CC-9 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 4/21/2014 10/9/2014

2014-CC-10 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 11/14/2014 9/13/2014

2014-CC-11 Peterson, DA Hon. Laettner (Inventory due) 12/12/2014 9/13/2014

El Dorado 2014-ED-1 Horn, Det. Hon. Wagoner 1/17/2014 1/14/2014

2014-ED-2 Bice, Investigative Asst. -DA Hon. Wagoner 2/7/2014 2/6/2014 9

59

Page 63: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Fresno 2014-FR-6 Egan, DA Hon. Harrell (Inventory due) 4/10/2014

2014-FR-7 Egan, DA Hon. Harrell (Inventory due) 4/10/2014

2014-FR-8 Egan, DA Hon. Harrell (Inventory due) 4/10/2014

2014-FR-9 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 11/25/2014

2014-FR-11 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/18/2014

2014-FR-13 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/7/2014

2014-FR-14 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/7/2014

2014-FR-15 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 12/28/2014

2014-FR-16 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/18/2015

2014-FR-17 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/8/2015

2014-FR-18 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 3/10/2015

2014-FR-19 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/3/2015

2014-FR-20 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/16/2015

2014-FR-21 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/28/2015

2014-FR-22 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/12/2015

2014-FR-23 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/26/2015

2014-FR-24 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 1/27/2015

2014-FR-25 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/13/2015

60

Page 64: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Fresno (cont’d) 2014-FR-26 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due)

1/23/2015

2014-FR-27 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/17/2015

2014-FR-28 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/1/2015

2014-FR-29 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/14/2015

2014-FR-30 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/16/2015

2014-FR-31 Egan, DA Hon. Peterson (Inventory due) 2/16/2015

Kern 2013-KE-35 Green, DA Hon. Twisselman 4/27/2014

2013-KE-36 Green, DA Hon. Twisselman 4/27/2014

2014-KE-37 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 7/23/2014 0

2014-KE-38 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 11/6/2014 0

2014-KE-39 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46

2014-KE-40 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 12/14/2014 0

2014-KE-41 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46

2014-KE-42 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46

2014-KE-43 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/2/2015 1/28/2015 46

2014-KE-44 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee (Inventory due) 1/18/2015

2014-KE-45 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/19/2015

2014-KE-46 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/19/2015

61

Page 65: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Kern (cont’d) 2015-KE-47 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/18/2015 1/22/2015 13

2015-KE-48 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 2/18/2015 1/22/2015 13

2014-KE-49 Green, DA Hon. Brownlee 10/9/2014 1/29/2015 7

2014-KE-50 Green, DA Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015

2014-KE-51 Green, DA Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015

2014-KE-52 Green, Da Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015

2014-KE-53 Green, DA Hon. Lewis 2/19/2015

Kings 2014-KI-16 Hacker, DA Hon. Reinhardt 10/20/2014 9/15/2014 50

2014-KI-17 Hacker, DA Hon. Tarter 1/13/2015 10/23/2014 5

Los Angeles 2014-LA-747 Lacey, DA Hon. FIDLER 4/1/2014

2014-LA-748 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/21/2014

2014-LA-749 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/19/2014

2014-LA-750 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 4/8/2014

2014-LA-751 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/12/2014

2014-LA-752 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/14/2014

2014-LA-753 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/20/2014

2014-LA-754 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/7/2014

2014-LA-755 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/12/2014

62

Page 66: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-756 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/5/2014

2014-LA-757 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/20/2014

2014-LA-758 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/26/2014

2014-LA-759 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/28/2014

2014-LA-760 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/26/2014

2014-LA-761 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/21/2014

2014-LA-762 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 6/28/2014

2014-LA-763 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/28/2014

2014-LA-764 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 5/23/2014

2014-LA-765 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 8/28/2014

2014-LA-766 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/16/2014

2014-LA-768 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/17/2014

2014-LA-769 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 8/16/2014

2014-LA-770 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 7/28/2014

2014-LA-771 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/6/2014

2014-LA-772 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/6/2014

2014-LA-773 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/11/2014

2014-LA-774 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/15/2014

63

Page 67: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-775 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/9/2014

2014-LA-776 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/27/2014

2014-LA-777 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/28/2014

2014-LA-778 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/29/2014

2014-LA-779 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler (Inventory due) 8/27/2014

2014-LA-780 Lacey, DA Hon. Olmedo 8/22/2014

2014-LA-781 Lacey, DA Hon. Olmedo 9/17/2014

2014-LA-782 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/23/2014

2014-LA-783 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/15/2014

2013-LA-786 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/23/2014 0

2014-LA-787 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/18/2014

2014-LA-788 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/19/2014

2014-LAK-2 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/28/2014

2014-LA-789 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/29/2014 0

2014-LA-790 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/28/2014

2014-LA-791 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/25/2014

2014-LA-792 Lacey, DA Hon. Olmedo 8/21/2014

2014-LA-793 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/29/2014

64

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Page 68: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-794 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/28/2014

2014-LA-795 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/29/2014

2014-LA-796 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/3/2014

2014-LA-797 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/5/2014

13-155 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/11/2014

2014-LA-800 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/11/2014

2014-LA-801 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/9/2014

2014-LA-804 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 4/3/2014

2014-LA-805 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/19/2014

2014-LA-806 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/2/2014

2014-LA-807 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/10/2014

2014-LA-808 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/18/2014

2014-LA-809 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/9/2014

2014-LA-810 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/27/2014

2014-LA-811 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/21/2014

2014-LA-812 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/13/2014

2014-LA-813 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/24/2014

2014-LA-814 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/29/2014

65

Page 69: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-815 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/30/2014

2014-LA-816 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/8/2014

2014-LA-817 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/5/2014

2014-LA-818 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/7/2014

2014-LA-820 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/14/2014

2014-LA-821 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/27/2014

2014-LA-822 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/1/2014

2014-LA-823 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/24/2014

2014-LA-824 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/12/2014

2014-LA-825 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/24/2014

2014-LA-826 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/3/2014

2014-LA-827 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/25/2014

2014-LA-828 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/7/2014

2014-LAS-6 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/7/2015

2014-LA-829 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/11/2014

2014-LA-831 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/13/2014

2014-LA-832 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/28/2014

2014-LA-833 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/22/2015

66

Page 70: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-834 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/28/2015

2014-LA-835 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/1/2015

2014-LA-836 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/17/2014

2014-LA-838 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/19/2014

2014-LA-839 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/9/2015

2014-LA-840 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/27/2014

2014-LA-841 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/11/2014

2014-LA-842 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/29/2014

2014-LA-843 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/3/2014

2014-LA-844 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/17/2014

2014-LA-845 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/26/2015

2014-LA-847 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/28/2014

2014-LA-848 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/14/2015

2014-LA-849 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/1/2014

2014-LA-850 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/25/2014

2014-LA-851 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/1/2015

2014-LA-852 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/10/2015

2014-LA-853 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/30/2015

67

Page 71: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-854 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 7/6/2014

2014-LA-855 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/20/2014

2014-LA-856 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/4/2014

2014-LA-857 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 8/4/2014

2014-LA-858 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/28/2014

2014-LA-859 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/25/2015

2014-LA-860 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/3/2015

2014-LA-861 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 11/18/2014

2014-LA-862 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 12/12/2014

2014-LA-863 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/8/2015

2014-LA-864 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 1/22/2015

2014-LA-866 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/12/2015

2014-LA-867 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/14/2015

2014-LA-868 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 2/27/2015

2014-LA-869 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/16/2015

2014-LA-870 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/18/2014

2014-LAS-7 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/12/2015

2014-LA-871 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/12/2014

68

Page 72: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LAS-8 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/16/2015

2014-LA-872 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/24/2015

2014-LA-873 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/9/2014

2014-LA-874 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/9/2014

2014-LA-876 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/23/2014

2014-LA-877 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/23/2014

2014-LA-878 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 3/23/2015

2014-LA-879 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 9/24/2014

2014-LA-880 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/6/2014

2014-LA-881 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 10/28/2014

2014-LA-883 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 5/3/2014

2014-LA-884 Lacey, DA Hon. Fidler 6/2/2014

Madera 2014-MAD-5 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/6/2015

2014-MAD-7 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/13/2015

2014-MAD-8 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/13/2015

2014-MAD-9 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 2/13/2015

2014-MAD-10 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015

2014-MAD-12 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015

69

Page 73: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Madera (cont’d) 2014-MAD-13 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015

2014-MAD-15 Keitz, DA Hon. Rigby 3/10/2015

Merced 2014-MER-27 Morse, DA Hon. Bacciarini 7/1/2014 7/1/2014 1060

Napa 2014-NA-1 Lieberstein, DA Hon. Boessenecker (Inventory due) 10/26/2014

Orange 2014-OR-86 Rackauckas, DA Hon. Jensen 6/27/2014 7/9/2014 8

2014-OR-87 Rackauckas, DA Hon. Jensen 2/23/2015

2014-OR-88 Rackauckas, DA Hon. Jensen 2/23/2015

Placer 2014-PLA-3 Wilson, ADA Hon. Wachob 5/29/2014 6/4/2014 39

2014-PLA-4 Wilson, ADA Hon. Wachob 5/29/2014 6/4/2014 19

Riverside 2013-RIV-899 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/1/2014

2013-RIV-902 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014

2013-RIV-904 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/5/2014

2013-RIV-905 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/10/2014

2013-RIV-906 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/9/2014

2013-RIV-911 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/9/2014

2013-RIV-915 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014 9/25/2014

2013-RIV-916 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/16/2014

2013-RIV-922 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 4/17/2014

70

Page 74: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-925 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014

2013-RIV-926 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/2/2014

2013-RIV-927 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2013

2013-RIV-928 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/7/2014

2013-RIV-929 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014

2013-RIV-930 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/2/2014

2013-RIV-931 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/2/2014

2013-RIV-932 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/7/2014

2013-RIV-933 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/8/2014

2013-RIV-934 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/3/2014

2013-RIV-935 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/9/2014

2013-RIV-936 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/5/2014

2013-RIV-937 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/29/2014

2013-RIV-938 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/10/2014

2013-RIV-939 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/5/2014

2013-RIV-940 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/5/2014

2013-RIV-941 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014

2013-RIV-942 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/11/2014

71

Page 75: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-943 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/15/2014

2013-RIV-944 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/17/2014

2013-RIV-945 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/17/2014

2013-RIV-946 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014

2013-RIV-947 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/20/2014

2013-RIV-948 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014

2013-RIV-949 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014

2013-RIV-950 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/18/2014

2013-RIV-951 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/23/2014

2013-RIV-952 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014

2013-RIV-954 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/26/2014

2013-RIV-955 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/26/2014

2013-RIV-956 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 4/11/2014

2014-RIV-957 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014

2014-RIV-958 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014

2014-RIV-959 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014

2014-RIV-960 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014

2014-RIV-961 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/27/2014

72

Page 76: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-962 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014

2014-RIV-963 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014

2014-RIV-964 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/9/2014

2014-RIV-965 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/8/2014

2014-RIV-966 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/7/2014

2014-RIV-967 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/30/2014

2014-RIV-968 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 4/23/2014

2014-RIV-969 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/14/2014

2014-RIV-970 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/14/2014

2014-RIV-971 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/11/2014

2014-RIV-972 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/13/2014

2014-RIV-973 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/16/2014

2014-RIV-974 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/16/2014

2014-RIV-975 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014

2014-RIV-976 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014

2014-RIV-977 Zellerbach, DA 5/15/2014

2014-RIV-980 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/20/2014

2014-RIV-981 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/11/2014

73

Page 77: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-982 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014

2014-RIV-983 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014

2014-RIV-984 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014

2014-RIV-985 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/22/2014

2014-RIV-986 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/25/2014

2014-RIV-987 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014

2014-RIV-988 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/26/2014

2014-RIV-989 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/15/2014

2014-RIV-990 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014

2014-RIV-991 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/16/2014

2014-RIV-992 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/27/2014

2014-RIV-993 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/27/2014

2014-RIV-994 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/1/2014

2014-RIV-995 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/6/2014

2014-RIV-996 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/17/2014

2013-RIV-997 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/1/2014

2014-RIV-998 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/25/2014

2014-RIV-999 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015

74

Page 78: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1000 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/29/2014

2014-RIV-1001 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/4/2014

2014-RIV-1002 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/4/2014

2014-RIV-1003 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/25/2014

2014-RIV-1004 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/18/2014

2014-RIV-1005 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/24/2014

2014-RIV-1006 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014

2014-RIV-1007 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/12/2014

2014-RIV-1008 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/20/2014

2014-RIV-1009 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/7/2014

2014-RIV-1010 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/6/2014

2014-RIV-1011 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014

2014-RIV-1012 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014

2014-RIV-1013 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/9/2014

2014-RIV-1014 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/11/2014

2014-RIV-1016 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/14/2014 9/25/2014

2014-RIV-1017 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 5/15/2014

2014-RIV-1018 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014

75

Page 79: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1019 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014

2014-RIV-1020 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014

2014-RIV-1021 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/18/2014

2014-RIV-1022 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014

2014-RIV-1023 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/16/2014

2014-RIV-1024 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/15/2014

2014-RIV-1025 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/14/2014

2014-RIV-1026 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014

2014-RIV-1027 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/19/2014

2014-RIV-1028 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014

2014-RIV-1029 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014

2014-RIV-1030 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/20/2014

2014-RIV-1031 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/18/2014

2014-RIV-1032 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014

2014-RIV-1033 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014

2014-RIV-1034 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/11/2014

2014-RIV-1035 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/17/2014

2014-RIV-1036 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014

76

Page 80: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1037 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014

2014-RIV-1039 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/22/2014

2014-RIV-1040 Zellerbach, DA 6/27/2014

2014-RIV-1041 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/1/2014

2014-RIV-1042 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/11/2014

2014-RIV-1043 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/17/2014

2014-RIV-1044 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/28/2014

2014-RIV-1045 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014

2013-RIV-1046 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/29/2014

2014-RIV-1047 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/24/2014

2014-RIV-1048 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/28/2014

2014-RIV-1049 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014

2014-RIV-1050 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/27/2014

2014-RIV-1051 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/2/2014

2014-RIV-1052 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/28/2014

2014-RIV-1053 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014

2014-RIV-1054 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014

2014-RIV-1055 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/30/2014

77

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Page 81: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1056 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/1/2014

2014-RIV-1057 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/4/2014

2014-RIV-1058 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/2/2014

2014-RIV-1059 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/4/2014

2014-RIV-1060 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/10/2014

2014-RIV-1061 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/4/2014

2014-RIV-1062 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/10/2014

2014-RIV-1063 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/5/2014

2014-RIV-1064 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014

2014-RIV-1065 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/6/2014

2014-RIV-1066 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/5/2014

2014-RIV-1067 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/3/2014

2014-RIV-1068 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/6/2014

2014-RIV-1070 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/15/2014

2014-RIV-1071 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014

2014-RIV-1072 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/21/2014

2014-RIV-1073 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014

2014-RIV-1074 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/11/2014

78

Page 82: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1075 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/19/2014

2014-RIV-1076 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1078 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1079 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1080 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014

2013-RIV-1081 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/11/2014

2014-RIV-1082 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014

2014-RIV-1083 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014

2014-RIV-1084 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/14/2014

2014-RIV-1085 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/15/2014

2014-RIV-1086 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014

2014-RIV-1087 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 6/27/2014

2014-RIV-1088 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/16/2014

2014-RIV-1089 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014

2014-RIV-1090 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/16/2014

2014-RIV-1091 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014

2014-RIV-1092 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/17/2014

2014-RIV-1093 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/17/2014

79

Page 83: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1094 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/19/2014

2014-RIV-1095 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014

2014-RIV-1096 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014

2014-RIV-1097 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014

2014-RIV-1098 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014

2014-RIV-1099 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014

2014-RIV-1100 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/23/2014

2014-RIV-1101 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/23/2014

2014-RIV-1102 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014

2014-RIV-1103 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/24/2014

2014-RIV-1104 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014

2014-RIV-1106 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014

2014-RIV-1108 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/25/2014

2014-RIV-1109 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014

2014-RIV-1110 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014

2014-RIV-1111 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014

2014-RIV-1112 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/26/2014

2014-RIV-1113 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014

80

Page 84: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1114 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014

2014-RIV-1115 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/30/2014

2014-RIV-1116 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/30/2014

2014-RIV-1117 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014

2014-RIV-1118 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/27/2014

2014-RIV-1119 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/1/2014

2014-RIV-1120 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/21/2014

2014-RIV-1121 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014

2014-RIV-1122 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/2/2013

2014-RIV-1123 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/30/2014

2014-RIV-1124 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/11/2014

2014-RIV-1125 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/6/2014

2014-RIV-1127 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1128 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/4/2014

2014-RIV-1129 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/12/2014

2014-RIV-1130 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/3/2014

2014-RIV-1131 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/3/2014

2013-RIV-1132 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014

81

Page 85: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1133 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014

2014-RIV-1134 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014

2013-RIV-1135 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014

2014-RIV-1136 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1137 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1138 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1139 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/2/2014

2014-RIV-1141 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1142 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/8/2014

2014-RIV-1143 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/10/2014

2014-RIV-1144 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/13/2014

2014-RIV-1145 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/13/2014

2014-RIV-1146 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1148 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/14/2014

2014-RIV-1149 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/14/2014

2014-RIV-1150 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/9/2014

2014-RIV-1151 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/29/2014

2014-RIV-1152 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/18/2014

82

Page 86: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1153 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/16/2014

2014-RIV-1154 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/12/2014

2014-RIV-1155 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/16/2014

2014-RIV-1156 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/17/2014

2014-RIV-1157 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/17/2014

2014-RIV-1158 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/17/2014

2014-RIV-1160 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/20/2014

2014-RIV-1161 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/29/2014

2014-RIV-1162 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/18/2014

2014-RIV-1163 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/18/2014

2014-RIV-1164 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/19/2014

2014-RIV-1165 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/21/2014

2014-RIV-1166 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/1/2014

2014-RIV-1167 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/18/2014

2014-RIV-1168 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/21/2014

2014-RIV-1169 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/20/2014

2014-RIV-1170 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/22/2014

2014-RIV-1171 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014

83

Page 87: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1172 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014

2014-RIV-1173 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/23/2014

2014-RIV-1174 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/23/2014

2014-RIV-1175 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 7/1/2014

2014-RIV-1176 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014

2013-RIV-1177 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/25/2014

2014-RIV-1178 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/25/2014

2014-RIV-1179 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/25/2014

2014-RIV-1180 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1181 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/24/2014

2014-RIV-1182 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1183 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/28/2014

2014-RIV-1184 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/9/2014

2014-RIV-1185 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/29/2014

2014-RIV-1186 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1187 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1188 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/3/2014

2014-RIV-1190 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

84

Page 88: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1191 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1192 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1193 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1194 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/3/2014

2014-RIV-1195 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/7/2014

2014-RIV-1196 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/10/2014

2014-RIV-1197 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1198 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/28/2014

2014-RIV-1199 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1200 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/21/2014

2014-RIV-1201 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1202 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/29/2014

2014-RIV-1203 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 8/6/2014

2014-RIV-1204 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/28/2014

2014-RIV-1205 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1206 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/30/2014

2014-RIV-1207 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/12/2014

2014-RIV-1208 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/12/2014

85

Page 89: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1209 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/3/2014

2014-RIV-1210 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/9/2014

2014-RIV-1211 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/9/2014

2014-RIV-1212 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/14/2014

2014-RIV-1213 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/13/2014

2014-RIV-1214 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

2014-RIV-1215 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/14/2014

2014-RIV-1216 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/14/2014

2014-RIV-1217 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/13/2014

2014-RIV-1218 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

2014-RIV-1219 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014

2014-RIV-1220 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1221 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/15/2014

2014-RIV-1222 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014

2014-RIV-1223 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/18/2014

2014-RIV-1224 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014

2014-RIV-1225 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 8/31/2014

2014-RIV-1226 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/20/2014

86

Page 90: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1227 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014

2014-RIV-1229 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/21/2014

2014-RIV-1231 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014

2014-RIV-1232 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/6/2014

2014-RIV-1233 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/22/2014

2014-RIV-1234 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014

2014-RIV-1235 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1236 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1237 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1238 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1239 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1240 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1241 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014

2014-RIV-1242 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014

2014-RIV-1243 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014

2014-RIV-1244 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/27/2014

2014-RIV-1245 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014

2014-RIV-1246 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/17/2014

87

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Page 91: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1247 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014

2014-RIV-1248 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014

2014-RIV-1249 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014

2014-RIV-1250 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/26/2014

2014-RIV-1251 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014

2014-RIV-1252 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/28/2014

2014-RIV-1253 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/13/2014

2014-RIV-1254 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/8/2014

2014-RIV-1255 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 10/4/2014

2014-RIV-1256 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/6/2014

2014-RIV-1257 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 9/19/2014

2014-RIV-1258 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/12/2014

2014-RIV-1259 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014

2014-RIV-1260 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014

2014-RIV-1261 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/9/2014

2014-RIV-1262 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 9/26/2014

2014-RIV-1263 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/8/2014

2014-RIV-1264 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/1/2014

88

Page 92: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1265 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/7/2014

2014-RIV-1266 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/10/2014

2014-RIV-1267 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1268 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/15/2014

2014-RIV-1269 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/12/2014

2014-RIV-1270 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/7/2014

2014-RIV-1271 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/13/2014

2014-RIV-1272 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/13/2014

2014-RIV-1273 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/12/2014

2014-RIV-1275 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/15/2014

2014-RIV-1276 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 10/11/2014

2014-RIV-1277 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/13/2014

2014-RIV-1278 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/12/2014

2014-RIV-1280 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/7/2014

2014-RIV-1281 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/15/2014

2014-RIV-1282 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/19/2014

2014-RIV-1283 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/17/2014

2014-RIV-1284 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/17/2014

89

Page 93: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1285 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/18/2014

2014-RIV-1286 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/29/2014

2014-RIV-1287 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/24/2014

2014-RIV-1288 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/31/2014

2014-RIV-1289 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/19/2015

2014-RIV-1290 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/28/2014

2014-RIV-1291 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/31/2014

2014-RIV-1292 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/12/2014

2014-RIV-1293 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/31/2014

2014-RIV-1294 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014

2013-RIV-1295 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014

2014-RIV-1296 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014

2014-RIV-1297 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/2/2014

2014-RIV-1298 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/3/2014

2014-RIV-1299 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/2/2014

2014-RIV-1300 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1301 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014

2014-RIV-1302 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014

90

Page 94: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1303 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014

2014-RIV-1304 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014

2014-RIV-1305 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014

2014-RIV-1306 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/7/2014

2014-RIV-1307 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014

2014-RIV-1308 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/16/2014

2014-RIV-1309 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 11/13/2014

2014-RIV-1310 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/8/2014

2014-RIV-1311 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 10/24/2014

2014-RIV-1312 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/15/2014

2014-RIV-1313 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/16/2014

2014-RIV-1315 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014

2014-RIV-1316 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/13/2014

2014-RIV-1317 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/16/2014

2014-RIV-1319 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/5/2014

2014-RIV-1320 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/13/2014

2014-RIV-1321 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/1/2014

2014-RIV-1322 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014

91

Page 95: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1323 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/22/2014

2014-RIV-1324 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014

2014-RIV-1326 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/12/2014

2014-RIV-1327 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/4/2014

2014-RIV-1328 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/21/2014

2014-RIV-1329 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/22/2014

2014-RIV-1330 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 11/21/2014

2014-RIV-1331 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/23/2014

2014-RIV-1332 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/20/2014

2014-RIV-1333 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/24/2014

2014-RIV-1334 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/24/2014

2014-RIV-1335 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/27/2014

2014-RIV-1336 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014

2014-RIV-1337 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/27/2014

2014-RIV-1338 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/27/2014

2014-RIV-1339 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014

2014-RIV-1340 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/29/2014

2014-RIV-1341 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/3/2014

92

Page 96: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1342 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014

2014-RIV-1343 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/28/2014

2014-RIV-1344 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

2014-RIV-1345 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/24/2015

2014-RIV-1346 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/24/2014

2014-RIV-1347 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/2/2014

2014-RIV-1348 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014

2014-RIV-1349 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/30/2014

2014-RIV-1350 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/13/2014

2014-RIV-1351 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

2014-RIV-1352 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/4/2014

2014-RIV-1353 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/4/2014

2014-RIV-1354 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/4/2014

2014-RIV-1355 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1356 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/18/2014

2014-RIV-1357 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/15/2014

2014-RIV-1358 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/6/2014

2014-RIV-1359 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/2/2014

93

Page 97: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1360 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1361 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1362 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 11/26/2014

2014-RIV-1363 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1364 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1365 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1366 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/9/2014

2014-RIV-1367 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/13/2014

2014-RIV-1368 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/11/2014

2014-RIV-1369 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/11/2014

2014-RIV-1370 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/12/2014

2014-RIV-1371 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/16/2014

2014-RIV-1372 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/15/2014

2014-RIV-1373 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/15/2015

2014-RIV-1374 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/20/2014

2014-RIV-1375 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/21/2014

2014-RIV-1376 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/23/2014

2014-RIV-1377 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/18/2015

94

Page 98: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1378 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/20/2014

2014-RIV-1379 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/24/2014

2014-RIV-1380 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/24/2014

2014-RIV-1381 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014

2014-RIV-1382 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/26/2014

2014-RIV-1383 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/11/2014

2014-RIV-1384 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/21/2014

2014-RIV-1385 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/15/2014

2014-RIV-1386 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/26/2014

2014-RIV-1387 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015

2014-RIV-1388 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/27/2014

2014-RIV-1389 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/5/2014

2014-RIV-1390 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014

2014-RIV-1392 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2014

2014-RIV-1393 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015

2014-RIV-1394 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015

2014-RIV-1395 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/2/2015

2014-RIV-1396 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

95

Page 99: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1398 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015

2014-RIV-1399 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015

2014-RIV-1400 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015

2014-RIV-1401 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/16/2014

2014-RIV-1402 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/12/2015

2014-RIV-1403 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/8/2015

2014-RIV-1404 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/22/2014

2014-RIV-1405 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/8/2015

2014-RIV-1406 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015

2014-RIV-1407 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1408 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1409 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1410 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/9/2014

2014-RIV-1411 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1412 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/10/2015

2014-RIV-1413 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/18/2015

2014-RIV-1414 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/8/2015

2014-RIV-1415 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

96

Page 100: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1416 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/16/2014

2014-RIV-1417 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/16/2015

2014-RIV-1418 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/16/2015

2014-RIV-1419 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015

2014-RIV-1420 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015

2014-RIV-1421 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015

2014-RIV-1423 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/17/2015

2014-RIV-1424 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/19/2014

2014-RIV-1425 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/18/2015

2014-RIV-1426 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/21/2014

2014-RIV-1427 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/24/2015

2014-RIV-1428 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/21/2014

2014-RIV-1429 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/21/2014

2014-RIV-1430 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/22/2014

2014-RIV-1431 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/5/2015

2014-RIV-1432 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015

2014-RIV-1433 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015

2014-RIV-1434 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 12/25/2015

97

Page 101: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1435 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/4/2015

2014-RIV-1436 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/28/2015

2014-RIV-1437 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/26/2015

2014-RIV-1438 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/30/2015

2014-RIV-1439 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/30/2014

2014-RIV-1440 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1441 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015

2014-RIV-1442 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/25/2015

2014-RIV-1443 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015

2014-RIV-1444 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez (Inventory due) 12/24/2014

2014-RIV-1445 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/3/2015

2014-RIV-1446 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2014

2014-RIV-1447 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/22/2015

2014-RIV-1449 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/2/2015

2014-RIV-1451 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/21/2015

2014-RIV-1452 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015

2014-RIV-1453 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2015

2014-RIV-1455 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2015

98

Page 102: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1456 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1457 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 1/23/2014

2014-RIV-1458 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1459 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1460 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1461 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/6/2015

2014-RIV-1463 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/8/2015

2014-RIV-1464 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015

2014-RIV-1466 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015

2014-RIV-1467 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2014

2014-RIV-1468 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/7/2015

2014-RIV-1470 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/8/2015

2014-RIV-1471 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/8/2015

2014-RIV-1472 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/13/2015

2014-RIV-1473 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015

2014-RIV-1474 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015

2014-RIV-1475 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015

2014-RIV-1476 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015

99

Page 103: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1477 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015

2014-RIV-1478 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015

2014-RIV-1479 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/13/2015

2014-RIV-1480 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/1/2015

2014-RIV-1481 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2015

2014-RIV-1482 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/4/2015

2014-RIV-1483 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/14/2014

2013-RIV-1484 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/20/2015

2014-RIV-1485 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/20/2015

2014-RIV-1486 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/22/2014

2014-RIV-1487 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/28/2015

2014-RIV-1488 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/22/2014

2014-RIV-1489 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015

2014-RIV-1490 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015

2014-RIV-1491 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1492 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1493 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1494 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

100

Page 104: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1495 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015

2014-RIV-1496 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/25/2015

2014-RIV-1497 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1498 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/19/2014

2014-RIV-1499 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015

2014-RIV-1500 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/25/2015

2014-RIV-1501 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2014

2014-RIV-1502 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/26/2015

2014-RIV-1503 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1504 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1505 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1506 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/27/2015

2014-RIV-1507 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

2014-RIV-1508 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/2/2015

2014-RIV-1510 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

2014-RIV-1511 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/4/2015

2014-RIV-1512 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

2014-RIV-1513 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

101

Page 105: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1514 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/22/2015

2014-RIV-1515 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/6/2015

2014-RIV-1516 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1517 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/10/2015

2014-RIV-1518 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1519 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1520 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1521 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 2/21/2015

2014-RIV-1522 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015

2014-RIV-1523 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1524 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/4/2015

2014-RIV-1525 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/6/2015

2014-RIV-1526 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015

2014-RIV-1527 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

2014-RIV-1528 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015

2014-RIV-1529 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/5/2015

2014-RIV-1530 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/6/2015

2014-RIV-1533 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015

102

Page 106: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1534 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/9/2015

2014-RIV-1535 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015

2014-RIV-1538 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/9/2015

2014-RIV-1539 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/7/2015

2014-RIV-1540 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015

2014-RIV-1541 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/30/2015

2014-RIV-1542 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015

2014-RIV-1544 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

2014-RIV-1545 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/11/2015

2014-RIV-1546 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/16/2015

2014-RIV-1547 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015

2014-RIV-1549 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/1/2015

2014-RIV-1550 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015

2014-RIV-1551 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1552 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1553 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1554 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1555 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

103

Page 107: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1557 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1558 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1559 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/18/2015

2014-RIV-1561 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1563 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1565 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/20/2015

2014-RIV-1568 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1569 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1570 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2014

2014-RIV-1571 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1572 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/21/2015

2014-RIV-1573 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/24/2015

2014-RIV-1574 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/2/2015

2014-RIV-1575 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/20/2015

2014-RIV-1576 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/20/2015

2014-RIV-1577 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/23/2015

2014-RIV-1581 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/22/2015

2014-RIV-1582 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/12/2015

104

Page 108: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1586 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/4/2015

2014-RIV-1587 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/10/2015

2014-RIV-1589 Zellerbach, DA Hon. Hernandez 3/19/2015

Sacramento 2014-SAC-54 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 5/14/2014 5/1/2014 213

2014-SAC-56 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 8/26/2014 12/24/2014 24

2014-SAC-57 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 11/18/2014 12/24/2014 39

2014-SAC-59 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 11/18/2014 12/24/2014 39

2014-SAC-60 Grippi, CDDA Hon. White 11/19/2014 11/18/2014 30

2014-SAC-61 Grippi, CDDA Hon. Savage 12/7/2014 12/24/2014 39

San Bernardino 2014-SBD-538 Roth, ADA Hon. Pace 4/4/2014

2014-SBD-539 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 4/4/2014

2014-SBD-540 Fermin, ADA Hon. Harrison 4/28/2014

2014-SBD-542 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 7/4/2014

2014-SBD-543 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 8/22/2014 9/4/2014

2014-SBD-544 Ramos, DA Hon. Harrison 9/5/2014 9/4/2014

2014-SBD-545 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 8/11/2014 5/30/2014 3

2014-SBD-546 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 8/11/2014

2014-SBD-547 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 8/15/2014 8/11/2014 14

105

Page 109: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

San Bernardino (cont’d) 2014-SBD-548 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 8/29/2014

2014-SBD-549 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 9/3/2014

2014-SBD-550 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 9/12/2014 9/4/2014 4

2014-SBD-551 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 9/16/2014 9/4/2014 5

2014-SBD-552 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 10/17/2014

2014-SBD-553 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 11/14/2014

2014-SBD-554 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 10/24/2014

2014-SBD-555 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 11/3/2014 12/19/2014 2

2014-SBD-557 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 11/14/2014

2014-SBD-558 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 12/12/2014

2014-SBD-559 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 1/1/2015

2014-SBD-560 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 12/22/2014 12/17/2014 4

2014-SBD-561 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 2/16/2015 1/7/2015 22

2014-SBD-562 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 1/23/2015 9/4/2014

2014-SBD-563 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 2/20/2015

2014-SBD-564 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 2/20/2015 1/7/2015 47

2014-SBD-566 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 3/13/2015

2014-SBD-567 Fermin, ADA Hon. Pace 2/16/2015

106

Page 110: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

San Bernardino (cont’d) 2014-SBD-569 Ramos, DA Hon. Pace 2/25/2015

2014-SBD-570 Ramos, DA Hon. Nakata 3/15/2014

2014-SBD-571 Ramos, DA Hon. Nakata 3/13/2015

San Diego 2014-SD-180 Hill, ASCA Hon. Rogers 2/20/2015

2014-SD-181 Sherman, ASCA Hon. Danielsen 2/25/2014 8/6/2014 8/6/2014 15

2014-SD-182 Tomaski, ASAC Hon. Fraser 8/5/2014 8/5/2014 151

2014-SD-183 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/11/2014 8/11/2014 111

2014-SD-185 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/11/2014 8/11/2014 111

2014-SD-186 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/19/2014 8/19/2014 290

2014-SD-187 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/19/2014 8/19/2014 290

2014-SD-188 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/1/2014 8/19/2014 290

2014-SD-189 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/5/2014 8/5/2014 151

2014-SD-190 Sherman, ASAC Hon. Rogers 8/5/2014 8/5/2014 151

2014-SD-191 Redman, Chief of Police Hon. Rogers 9/4/2014 9/5/2014 64

2014-SD-192 Gore, Sheriff Hon. Fraser 2/26/2015 8/26/2014

2014-SD-193 Gore, Sheriff Hon. Rogers 2/26/2015 8/26/2014

2014-SD-195 Redman, Chief of Police Hon. Rogers 9/4/2014 6/3/2014 9/5/2014 64

San Joaquin 2015-SJ-36 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 7/2/2014 7/2/2014

107

Page 111: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

San Joaquin (cont’d) 2015-SJ-37 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 9/4/2014 3/1/2014 0

2015-SJ-38 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 9/7/2014 9/7/2014

2015-SJ-39 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 9/12/2014 9/12/2014

2015-SJ-40 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 9/18/2014 9/18/2014

2015-SJ-41 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014

2015-SJ-42 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 11/4/2014 11/14/2014

2015-SJ-43 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 11/28/2014 11/28/2014

2015-SJ-44 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 9/3/2014 9/3/2014

2015-SJ-45 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014

2015-SJ-46 Willett, DA Hon. Guiliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014

2015-SJ-47 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014

2015-SJ-48 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/19/2014 12/19/2014

2015-SJ-49 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/3/2014 12/3/2014

2015-SJ-50 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014

2015-SJ-51 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/10/2014 12/10/2014

2015-SJ-52 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 9/10/2014 9/10/2014

2015-SJ-53 Willett, DA Hon. Guilliani 12/19/2014 12/19/2014

Santa Barbara 2014-SBA-46 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 1/9/2015 11/4/2014

108

Page 112: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Santa Barbara (cont’d) 2014-SBA-47 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 9/9/2014 9/9/2014 35

2014-SBA-48 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 9/9/2014 9/9/2014 35

2014-SBA-49 Dudley, DA Hon. Kelly 9/9/2014 9/9/2014 35

Santa Clara 2014-SCL-71 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 9/22/2014 9/22/2014 34

2014-SCL-72 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 9/11/2014 9/11/2014 34

2014-SCL-74 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014

2014-SCL-75 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014

2014-SCL-76 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 5/17/2014 9/22/2014 154

2014-SCL-77 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 4/21/2014 9/22/2014 154

2014-SCL-78 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 6/1/2014 9/22/2014 154

2014-SCL-79 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 7/11/2014 9/22/2014 154

2014-SCL-80 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 7/22/2014 9/22/2014 154

2014-SCL-81 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014

2014-SCL-82 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 1/12/2015 10/12/2014

2014-SCL-83 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett 2/28/2015

2014-SCL-84 Rosen, DA Hon. Barrett (Inventory due) 12/28/2014 12/4/2014 119

Sonoma 2014-SON-6 Ravitch, DA Hon. Gnoss 11/7/2014 11/20/2014 11/25/2014 24

2014-SON-7 Ravitch, DA Hon. Gnoss 5/18/2014 5/5/2014 27

109

Page 113: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Stanislaus 2014-STA-63 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 8/4/2014 5/7/2014 7/22/2014 14

2014-STA-64 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 6/19/2014 9/5/2014 2

2014-STA-65 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 8/4/2014 5/7/2014 7/22/2014 12

2014-STA-67 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 7/11/2014 7/11/2014 45

2014-STA-68 Kreis, Agent Hon. Ashley 8/4/2014 5/7/2014 7/22/2014 9

2014-STA-69 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 6/10/2014 9/5/2014 2

2014-STA-70 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/22/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-71 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/17/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-72 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/22/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-73 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 10/27/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-74 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 10/25/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-75 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 11/22/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-76 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 12/31/2014 10/8/2014 18

2014-STA-77 Fladager, DA Hon. Ashley 12/31/2014 10/8/2014 18

Tulare 2014-TUL-8 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/25/2015

2014-TUL-9 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/15/2015

2014-TUL-10 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/16/2015

2014-TUL-11 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 9/5/2014

110

Page 114: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Tulare (cont’d) 2014-TUL-12 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due)

10/30/2014

2014-TUL-13 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 12/17/2014

2014-TUL-14 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 12/11/2014

2014-TUL-15 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 12/11/2014

2014-TUL-16 Underwood, ADA Hon. Montejano (Inventory due) 1/16/2015

2014-TUL-18 Underwood, ADA Hon. Ferguson (Inventory due) 11/20/2014

2015-TUL-19 Underwood, ADA Hon. Ferguson (Inventory due) 9/18/2014

Ventura 2013-VE-74 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 11/2/2014 8/29/2014

2014-VE-84 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 1/11/2015 10/17/2014

2014-VE-85 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 5/8/2014 5/7/2014

2014-VE-86 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 5/15/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-87 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Ayers 6/1/2014 5/28/2014 10

2014-VE-88 Totten, DA Hon. O'Neill (Inventory due) 6/13/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-89 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 6/18/2014 6/13/2014 36

2014-VE-90 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 6/26/2014 3/23/2015

2014-VE-91 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 7/14/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-92 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 6/28/2014 5/28/2014 4

2014-VE-93 Maurizi, CADA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 7/2/2014 3/31/2015

111

Page 115: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 5 Penal Code Section 629.62 Inventory Report

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No. Name of

Applicant/Agency Judge

Authorizing Application

Date of Order for Service of Inventory

Date Granted for

Postponement of Service of

Inventory

Date of Compliance

With Inventory

Order

Number of

Inventory Notices

Sent

Ventura (cont’d) 2014-VE-94 Maurizi, CADA Hon. O'Neill (Inventory due)

8/12/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-95 Totten, DA Hon. Ayers (Inventory due) 9/10/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-96 Totten, DA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 9/27/2014 3/20/2015

2014-VE-97 Totten, DA Hon. Ayers (Inventory due) 10/18/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-98 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 10/23/2014 2/5/2015

2014-VE-99 Maurizi, CADA Hon. White (Inventory due) 11/19/2014 3/1/2015

2014-VE-100 Maurizi, CADA Hon. Ayers (Inventory due) 11/22/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-101 Totten, DA Hon. Back (Inventory due) 12/8/2014 4/3/2014

2014-VE-102 Totten, DA Hon. O'Neill (Inventory due) 11/26/2014 4/11/2015

2014-VE-103 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce (Inventory due) 12/26/2014 3/1/2015

2014-VE-104 Frawley, CDDA Hon. O'Neill 1/27/2015

2014-VE-105 Frawley, CDDA Hon. White 4/13/2015

2014-VE-106 Totten, DA Hon. Back 2/1/2015

2014-VE-109 Totten, DA Hon. White 1/20/2015

2014-VE-110 Totten, DA Hon. Back 2/7/2014

2014-VE-111 Totten, DA Hon. White 2/12/2015

2014-VE-113 Totten, DA Hon. DeNoce 3/12/2015

112

Page 116: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Alameda 2014-ALA-19 2 monitors; 1 wire room manager 78,000 3,200 81,200

2014-ALA-20 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 15,600 1,600 17,200

2014-ALA-24 1 monitor, 1 wire room manager 39,000 1,600 40,600

2014-ALA-28 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 35,200 1,600 36,800

2014-ALA-29 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 40,300 1,600 41,900

2014-ALA-30 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 23,400 1,600 25,000

2014-ALA-31 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 39,000 1,600 40,600

2014-ALA-32 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 29,900 1,600 31,500

2014-ALA-33 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 29,900 1,600 31,500

2014-ALA-34 1 monitor; 1 wire room manager 15,600 1,600 17,200

Alameda Total 345,900 17,600 363,500

Contra Costa 2014-CO-1 Cost not available

2014-CO-2 45,787 6,950 52,737

2014-CC-8 8 investigators 5,000 5,000 10,000

2014-CC-9 Costs related to CCCDA 14-001

2014-CC-10 Costs related to CCCDA 14-006

2014-CC-11 Costs related to CCCDA 14-006

Contra Costa Total 50,787 11,950 62,737

El Dorado 2014-ED-1 25 34,935 50 34,985

2014-ED-2 31 36,700 900 37,600

El Dorado Total 71,635 950 72,585

4 Totals per electronic wiretap and per county do not delineate between sources of funds (county, state, federal). 113

Page 117: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Fresno 2014-FR-6 66,125 5,092 71,217

2014-FR-7 Costs related to 2013-06

2014-FR-8 Costs related to 2013-06

2014-FR-9 agents; installers; monitors 49,516 1,400 50,916

2014-FR-11 agents; installer; monitor 49,516 1,400 50,916

2014-FR-13 agents; installers; monitors 64,736 1,400 66,136

2014-FR-14 agents; installer; monitor 53,312 1,400 54,712

2014-FR-15 agents; install; monitor 64,736 1,400 66,136

2014-FR-16 agents; intaller; monitor 140,896 1,400 142,296

2014-FR-17 agents; installer, monitor 95,200 2,800 98,000

2014-FR-18 agents; installer; monitors 114,240 2,800 117,040

2014-FR-19 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-20 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-21 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-22 0 500 500

2014-FR-23 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-24 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-25 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-26 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-27 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-28 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

114

Page 118: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Fresno (cont’d) 2014-FR-29 1 special agent sup.;

6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-30 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

2014-FR-31 1 special agent sup.; 6 special agents 18,925 1,500 20,425

Fresno Total 925,377 37,592 962,969

Kern 2013-KE-35 Costs related to 13-07

2013-KE-36 Costs related to 13-07

2014-KE-37 8 agents 4,000 2,200 6,200

2014-KE-38 11 agents 18,000 1,500 19,500

2014-KE-39 30 federal; contract; state and local 67,000 8,289 75,289

2014-KE-40 Costs related to 14-05

2014-KE-41 Costs related to 14-06

2014-KE-42 Costs related to 14-06

2014-KE-43 Costs related to 14-06

2014-KE-44 Costs related to 14-06

2014-KE-45 16 agents 20,000 17,000 37,000

2014-KE-46 Costs related to 14-12

2015-KE-47 25 detectives 15,500 2,200 17,700

2015-KE-48 Costs related to 14-18

2014-KE-49 4 agents 22,893 1,316 24,209

2014-KE-50 16 detectives 70,980 3,000 73,980

2014-KE-51 Costs related to 14-14

2014-KE-52 Costs related to 14-14

2014-KE-53 Costs related to 14-14

Kern Total 218,373 35,505 253,878

115

Page 119: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Kings 2014-KI-16 3 monitors; 5 agents; 1 technician 50,000 1,000 51,000

2014-KI-17 1 agent; 1 monitor 300 500 800

Kings Total 50,300 1,500 51,800

Los Angeles 2014-LA-747 4 monitors; 3 detectives; 2 technicians

29,500 4,000 33,500

2014-LA-748 1 monitor per day - Federal $ only 11,000 2,000 13,000

2014-LA-749

4 monitors per day for first 30 days 2 monitors per day for second 30

days

0 3,858 3,858

2014-LA-750 2 monitors per day - state 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-751 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-752 2 monitors per day 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-753

4 monitors per day for first 30 days 2 monitors per day for second 30

days

0 3,858 3,858

2014-LA-754 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-755 2 monitors per day - federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-756 2 monitors per day - state 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-757

4 monitors per day for first 30 days 2 monitors per day for second 30

days

3,858 0 3,858

2014-LA-758 4 monitors per day - Federal $ only 36,000 6,000 42,000

2014-LA-759 2 monitors per day - state 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-760 1 monitor per day - Federal $ only 11,000 2,000 13,000

116

Page 120: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-761 1 monitor per day -

Federal $ only 11,000 2,000 13,000

2014-LA-762 2 monitors per day -

Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-763 2 monitors per day - state 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-764 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-765 2 monitors per day - state 76,680 1,700 78,380

2014-LA-766 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-768 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-769 2 monitors per day – Federal 52,945 3,900 56,845

2014-LA-770 2 monitors per day – state 25,560 700 26,260

2014-LA-771 2 monitors per day - Federal 23,000 700 23,700

2014-LA-772 2 monitors per day - state 23,000 700 23,700

2014-LA-773 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-774 2 monitors per day - state 23,000 700 23,700

2014-LA-775 2 monitors per day 24,460 1,100 25,560

2014-LA-776 2 monitors per day - state 0 1,286 1,286

2014-LA-777 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-778 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-779 2 monitors per day - state 25,000 700 25,700

2014-LA-780 2 monitors per day - Federal 5,136 460 5,596

2014-LA-781 2 monitors per day - Federal 23,000 700 23,700

117

Page 121: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-782 2 monitors per day -

state 2,568 430 2,998

2014-LA-783 2 wiretap monitors per day 25,000 1,700 26,700

2013-LA-786 7 per month 105,000 7,500 112,500

2014-LA-787 5 30,000 20,000 50,000

2014-LA-788 2 monitors per day – Federal 52,945 3,900 56,845

2014-LAK-2 2 monitors per day - Federal 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-LA-789 2 monitors per day - Federal 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-LA-790 7 60,000 5,000 65,000

2014-LA-791 7 35,000 2,500 37,500

2014-LA-792 7 20,000 2,000 22,000

2014-LA-793 2 monitors per day - state 25,000 700 25,700

2014-LA-794 2 monitors per day 20,000 2,000 22,000

2014-LA-795 5 monitors 25,000 2,000 27,000

2014-LA-796 7 monitors 35,000 2,500 37,500

2014-LA-797 2 monitors per day - state 76,680 1,700 78,380

13-155 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-800 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-801 2 monitors per day - state 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-804 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 1,100 19,100

2014-LA-805 2 monitors per day - Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-806 2 monitors - Federa 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-807 2 monitors per day 24,450 1,600 26,050

118

Page 122: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-808 2 monitors per day -

Federal 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-809 2 monitors per day - Federal 78,548 2,100 80,648

2014-LA-810 2 monitors per day - Federal 52,366 1,400 53,766

2014-LA-811 7 contracted monitors 200,000 15,000 215,000

2014-LA-812 26,000 2,000 28,000

2014-LA-813 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-814 1 installer; 2 monitors 7,458 2,800 10,258

2014-LA-815 26,000 2,000 28,000

2014-LA-816 2 monitors per day - state 25,000 700 25,700

2014-LA-817 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-818 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-820 2 monitors per day 26,183 1,600 27,783

2014-LA-821 Cost not available

2014-LA-822 2 wiretap monitors per day 78,156 1,760 79,916

2014-LA-823 75,000 7,500 82,500

2014-LA-824 2 monitors per day 25,560 775 26,335

2014-LA-825 25,000 2,500 27,500

2014-LA-826 2 26,000 600 26,600

2014-LA-827 7 35,000 2,500 37,500

2014-LA-828 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LAS-6 6,780 2,800 9,580

2014-LA-829 52,000 4,000 56,000

119

Page 123: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-831 26,000 2,000 28,000

2014-LA-832 26,000 600 26,600

2014-LA-833 4 monitors; 1 technician 90,901 20,000 110,901

2014-LA-834 install; monitor 22,000 1,013 23,013

2014-LA-835 install; monitor 22,000 400 22,400

2014-LA-836 1 installer; 2 monitors 6,780 2,800 9,580

2014-LA-838 2 monitors; 1 techincian 25,691 700 26,391

2014-LA-839 tanslators 26,000 5,000 31,000

2014-LA-840 2 monitors per day - state 76,680 1,700 78,380

2014-LA-841 2 monitors 25,691 775 26,466

2014-LA-842 11 47,522 6,170 53,692

2014-LA-843 8 monitors 17,144 535 17,679

2014-LA-844 7 contracted monitors 50,000 1,500 51,500

2014-LA-845 2 monitors per day - Federal $ only 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LA-847 25,560 2,000 27,560

2014-LA-848 25,560 2,000 27,560

2014-LA-849 51,120 4,000 55,120

2014-LA-850 25,000 2,500 27,500

2014-LA-851 26,182 5,000 31,182

2014-LA-852 26,182 2,500 28,682

2014-LA-853 25,000 5,000 30,000

2014-LA-854 58,000 2,000 60,000

2014-LA-855 60,000 6,000 66,000

120

Page 124: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-856 26,000 2,000 28,000

2014-LA-857 25,000 10,000 35,000

2014-LA-858 75,000 2,500 77,500

2014-LA-859 75,000 5,000 80,000

2014-LA-860 26,000 4,000 30,000

2014-LA-861 50,000 5,000 55,000

2014-LA-862 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-LA-863 25,000 2,500 27,500

2014-LA-864 25,000 5,000 30,000

2014-LA-866 install; agent monitors; contracts 156,000 7,500 163,500

2014-LA-867 3 officers; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 2,000 27,560

2014-LA-868 26,000 2,000 28,000

2014-LA-869 4 48,000 6,000 54,000

2014-LA-870 2 monitors 25,000 2,000 27,000

2014-LAS-7 install; monitors; contracts 156,000 15,500 171,500

2014-LA-871 2 monitors per day 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-LAS-8 25,000 1,500 26,500

2014-LA-872 2 monitors per day 28,000 1,013 29,013

2014-LA-873 2 monitors per day for 30 days 26,183 2,000 28,183

2014-LA-874 1 install; 2 monitors 27,000 2,000 29,000

2014-LA-876 8 officers; 0 monitors; 1 technician 37,800 5,000 42,800

2014-LA-877 8 officers, 0 monitors; 1 technician 18,900 2,500 21,400

121

Page 125: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014-LA-878 install; agent monitors;

contracts 156,000 13,000 169,000

2014-LA-879 3 officers; 2 monitors; 1 techincian 25,560 2,000 27,560

2014-LA-880 26,000 600 26,600

2014-LA-881 6,000 1,700 7,700

2014-LA-883 Cost not available

2014-LA-884 2 monitors day - state 18,000 2,000 20,000

Los Angeles Total 4,278,849 401,533 4,680,382

Madera 2014-MAD-5 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-7 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-8 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-9 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-10 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-12 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-13 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

2014-MAD-15 3 interpreters; 7 agents/monitors 0 3,000 3,000

Madera Total 0 24,000 24,000

Merced 2014-MER-27 16 monitors; 25 agents 77,921 0 77,921

Merced Total 77,921 0 77,921

Napa 2014-NA-1 bilingual investigators; wire room supervisor 8,200 800 9,000

Napa Total 8,200 800 9,000

Orange 2014-OR-86 17 sworn personnel

acting as monitors and technicians

36,105 15,652 51,757

122

Page 126: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Orange (cont’d) 2014-OR-87 20 police officers 10,546 6,200 16,746

2014-OR-88 20 police officers 9,228 6,200 15,428

Orange Total 55,879 28,052 83,931

Placer 2014-PLA-3

3 monitors in 10 hour shifts pool of 20

monitors 1 technician 2 agents

15,000 2,500 17,500

2014-PLA-4 Costs related to 2014-PLA-3

Placer Total 15,000 2,500 17,500

Riverside 2013-RIV-899 Cost not available

2013-RIV-902 Cost not available

2013-RIV-904 Cost not available

2013-RIV-905 Cost not available

2013-RIV-906 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 24,708 643 25,351

2013-RIV-911 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2013-RIV-915 Cost not available

2013-RIV-916 2 monitors 40,378 1,200 41,578

2013-RIV-922 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 25,440 642 26,082

2013-RIV-925 2 monitors 18,000 4,000 22,000

2013-RIV-926 Cost not available

2013-RIV-927 Cost not available

2013-RIV-928 1 installer; 3 monitors 26,052 1,600 27,652

2013-RIV-929 Cost not available

2013-RIV-930 1 agent; 2 monitors 62,000 2,500 64,500

2013-RIV-931 1 agent; 2 monitors 62,000 2,500 64,500

123

Page 127: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-932 2 monitors 40,154 1,700 41,854

2013-RIV-933 Cost not available

2013-RIV-934 Cost not available

2013-RIV-935 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2013-RIV-936 Cost not available

2013-RIV-937 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2013-RIV-938 1 officer; 4 monitors; 1 technician 49,416 1,929 51,345

2013-RIV-939 Cost not available

2013-RIV-940 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2013-RIV-941 2 installers and 4 monitors 78,677 2,825 81,502

2013-RIV-942 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 22,152 643 22,795

2013-RIV-943

8 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

81,360 4,500 85,860

2013-RIV-944 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000

2013-RIV-945 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000

2013-RIV-946 2 monitors 24,450 1,100 25,550

2013-RIV-947 Cost not available

2013-RIV-948 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2013-RIV-949 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2013-RIV-950 2 monitors 26,000 725 26,725

2013-RIV-951 2 monitors 26,000 700 26,700

2013-RIV-952 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2013-RIV-954 Cost not available

124

Page 128: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2013-RIV-955 Cost not available

2013-RIV-956 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643

2014-RIV-957 2 monitors 42,863 1,700 44,563

2014-RIV-958 2 monitors 24,400 1,100 25,500

2014-RIV-959 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-960 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-961 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-962

8 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

160,000 18,000 178,000

2014-RIV-963 4 monitors 80,000 8,000 88,000

2014-RIV-964 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-965 4 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-966 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 25,560 1,286 26,846

2014-RIV-967 2 monitors 51,120 2,400 53,520

2014-RIV-968 2 monitors; 1 interpreter 5,964 2,500 8,464

2014-RIV-969 4 monitors 48,900 2,200 51,100

2014-RIV-970 2 monitors 26,000 725 26,725

2014-RIV-971 2 Spanish monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400

2014-RIV-972 Cost not available

2014-RIV-973 Cost not available

2014-RIV-974 Cost not available

2014-RIV-975 2 monitors 118,133 12,500 130,633

2014-RIV-976 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

125

Page 129: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-977 2 monitors 25,560 1,200 26,760

2014-RIV-980 2 monitors 24,500 1,100 25,600

2014-RIV-981 2 monitors 17,040 1,500 18,540

2014-RIV-982 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000

2014-RIV-983 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-984 2 monitors 24,211 2,600 26,811

2014-RIV-985 2 monitors and 1 technician 26,052 1,600 27,652

2014-RIV-986 Cost not available

2014-RIV-987 Cost not available

2014-RIV-988 Cost not available

2014-RIV-989 2 monitors 25,000 1,000 26,000

2014-RIV-990 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-991

10 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

103,360 6,000 109,360

2014-RIV-992 4 monitors per day 49,100 2,200 51,300

2014-RIV-993 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

25,560 1,284 26,844

2014-RIV-994 2 monitors 25,560 7,500 33,060

2014-RIV-995 2 monitors 20,947 800 21,747

2014-RIV-996 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 17,040 643 17,683

2013-RIV-997 2 monitors 26,153 1,200 27,353

2014-RIV-998 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800

2014-RIV-999 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

230,040 13,750 243,790

126

Page 130: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1000 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1001 2 monitors 25,560 1,500 27,060

2014-RIV-1002 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1003 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1004 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1005 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1006 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1007 2 monitors 5,112 1,200 6,312

2014-RIV-1008 1 agent; 2 monitors 15,000 1,500 16,500

2014-RIV-1009 1 officer; 4 monitors and 1 technician 26,183 2,000 28,183

2014-RIV-1010 8 persons used re

installation and monitoring

28,627 2,870 31,497

2014-RIV-1011 3 monitors 60,000 6,000 66,000

2014-RIV-1012 4 monitors 40,000 4,000 44,000

2014-RIV-1013 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1014 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 5,112 643 5,755

2014-RIV-1016 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1017 2 monitors 3,333 1,000 4,333

2014-RIV-1018 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1019 2 monitors 20,000 2,000 22,000

2014-RIV-1020 2 monitors 22,000 1,800 23,800

2014-RIV-1021 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1022 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800

2014-RIV-1023 4 monitors 51,120 1,580 52,700

127

Page 131: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1024 2 monitors 26,183 1,700 27,883

2014-RIV-1025 2 monitors 0 1,500 1,500

2014-RIV-1026 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1027 4 monitors 36,240 1,200 37,440

2014-RIV-1028 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1029 2 monitors 25,560 1,500 27,060

2014-RIV-1030 4 monitors 41,004 1,290 42,294

2014-RIV-1031 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1032 4 monitors 69,228 0 69,228

2014-RIV-1033

6 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

120,000 12,000 132,000

2014-RIV-1034 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1

technician 25,560 1,286 26,846

2014-RIV-1035 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1036 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1037 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1039

6 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

12,000 12,000 24,000

2014-RIV-1040 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1041 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1042 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1

technician 0 643 643

2014-RIV-1043 2 monitors 10,400 1,000 11,400

2014-RIV-1044 Cost not available

128

Page 132: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1045 2 monitors 18,000 4,000 22,000

2013-RIV-1046 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1047 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1048 2 monitors 15,560 790 16,350

2014-RIV-1049 2 metropolitan translators 153,360 3,000 156,360

2014-RIV-1050 3 monitors and 1 technician 26,051 3,200 29,251

2014-RIV-1051 2 Spanish monitors 26,051 2,800 28,851

2014-RIV-1052 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1053 2 monitors 96,000 5,400 101,400

2014-RIV-1054 2 monitors 35,000 3,000 38,000

2014-RIV-1055 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1056 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1057 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1058 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1059 8 officers; 0 monitors; and 1 technician 18,900 2,500 21,400

2014-RIV-1060 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1061 2 monitors 24,450 1,100 25,550

2014-RIV-1062 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1063 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1064 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1065 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1066 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1067 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

129

Page 133: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1068

1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; and 1 technician

51,120 1,929 53,049

2014-RIV-1070 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1071 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800

2014-RIV-1072 2 monitors 4,620 2,300 6,920

2014-RIV-1073 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1074 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1075 2 monitors and 1 agent 8,348 2,600 10,948

2014-RIV-1076 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1078 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1079 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1080 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2013-RIV-1081 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1082 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1083 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1084 2 monitors 102,240 5,000 107,240

2014-RIV-1085 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-1086 1 officer; 6 monitors; and 1 technician 85,200 2,582 87,782

2014-RIV-1087 2 monitors 2,300 0 2,300

2014-RIV-1088 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1089 1 officer; 4 civilian monitors; 1 technician 51,120 1,284 52,404

2014-RIV-1090 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-1091 2 translators 51,120 4,200 55,320

2014-RIV-1092 2 monitors 65,827 2,400 68,227

130

Page 134: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1093 2 monitors 25,560 1,500 27,060

2014-RIV-1094 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1095 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-1096 2 monitors 96,000 14,400 110,400

2014-RIV-1097 2 Spanish monitors 26,051 2,800 28,851

2014-RIV-1098 2 monitors 26,000 2,500 28,500

2014-RIV-1099 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1100 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1101 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1102 1 officer; 4 civilian monitors; 1 technician 51,120 1,286 52,406

2014-RIV-1103 3 DEA special agents; 7 TFOs; and 2 monitors 125,400 2,000 127,400

2014-RIV-1104 2 monitors 14,707 25,560 40,267

2014-RIV-1106 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1108 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1109 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1110 7 civilian monitors 133,966 9,350 143,316

2014-RIV-1111

12 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

42,000 1,000 43,000

2014-RIV-1112 2 monitors per day 22,000 4,000 26,000

2014-RIV-1113 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1114 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1115 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1116 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

131

Page 135: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1117 2 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-1118 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1119 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1120 2 monitors 1,870 2,500 4,370

2014-RIV-1121 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1122 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1123 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1124 2 monitors 12,080 700 12,780

2014-RIV-1125 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1127 8 monitors 144,000 16,000 160,000

2014-RIV-1128 2 monitors 14,707 25,560 40,267

2014-RIV-1129 2 monitors per day 24,000 500 24,500

2014-RIV-1130 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

52,364 1,286 53,650

2014-RIV-1131 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2013-RIV-1132 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1133 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1134 2 monitors 14,707 51,120 65,827

2013-RIV-1135 6 monitors 76,680 4,800 81,480

2014-RIV-1136 5 monitors 45,000 70,000 115,000

2014-RIV-1137 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1138 2 monitors 52,000 1,450 53,450

2014-RIV-1139 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1141 4 monitors 36,240 1,200 37,440

132

Page 136: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1142 2 monitors 26,000 1,700 27,700

2014-RIV-1143 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1144 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1145 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1146 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1148 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1149 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1150 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1151 2 monitors 11,928 1,000 12,928

2014-RIV-1152 4 monitors 4,027 2,600 6,627

2014-RIV-1153 2 monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400

2014-RIV-1154 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

68,280 1,929 70,209

2014-RIV-1155 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1156 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1157 2 monitors per day 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1158 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1160 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1161 3 monitors 852 580 1,432

2014-RIV-1162 1 officer; 6 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

43,600 2,029 45,629

2014-RIV-1163 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1164 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1165 2 monitors 14,707 51,120 65,827

133

Page 137: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1166

1 officer; 2 civilian monitors;

1 technician 8,520 643 9,163

2014-RIV-1167 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

52,364 1,286 53,650

2014-RIV-1168 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1169 2 translators/monitors 25,560 3,900 29,460

2014-RIV-1170 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1171 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1172 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1173 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1174 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1175 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1176 2 monitors 96,000 1,000 97,000

2013-RIV-1177 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1178 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1179 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1180 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1181 2 monitors 28,624 2,600 31,224

2014-RIV-1182 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1183 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; 1 technician

25,560 643 26,203

2014-RIV-1184 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1185 2 monitors 26,000 4,000 30,000

2014-RIV-1186 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

134

Page 138: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1187

12 persons used to coordinate monitoring,

installation and transcript preparation

42,000 1,000 43,000

2014-RIV-1188 2 monitors 115,020 12,400 127,420

2014-RIV-1190 6 monitors 124,761 10,650 135,411

2014-RIV-1191 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1192 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1193 2 monitors 25,691 775 26,466

2014-RIV-1194 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1195 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

5,964 643 6,607

2014-RIV-1196 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 35,784 1,286 37,070

2014-RIV-1197 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-1198 2 monitors 52,000 5,000 57,000

2014-RIV-1199 1 monitor per day 14,000 2,500 16,500

2014-RIV-1200 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1201

6 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

67,500 70,000 137,500

2014-RIV-1202 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 34,080 1,286 35,366

2014-RIV-1203 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643

2014-RIV-1204 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1205 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1206

30 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

18,000 2,000 20,000

135

Page 139: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1207 2 monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400

2014-RIV-1208 1 officer; 4 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

51,120 1,286 52,406

2014-RIV-1209 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1210 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1211 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1212 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1213 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1214 10 officers 94,500 12,500 107,000

2014-RIV-1215 6 monitors 52,100 2,400 54,500

2014-RIV-1216 3 monitors 30,312 2,000 32,312

2014-RIV-1217 1 officer, 2 monitors and 1 tech 25,560 1,286 26,846

2014-RIV-1218 2 monitors 48,000 2,800 50,800

2014-RIV-1219 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1220

16 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

144,000 16,000 160,000

2014-RIV-1221 2 monitors 26,000 2,500 28,500

2014-RIV-1222 2 monitors 24,450 2,000 26,450

2014-RIV-1223 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1224 2 monitors 96,000 16,000 112,000

2014-RIV-1225 2 monitors 10,052 2,600 12,652

2014-RIV-1226 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-1227 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1229 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

136

Page 140: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1231 4 monitors 67,500 37,500 105,000

2014-RIV-1232 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

7,668 643 8,311

2014-RIV-1233 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1234 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1235 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1236 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1237 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1238 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1239 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1240

12 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

315,763 1,600 317,363

2014-RIV-1241 2 monitors 24,000 5,500 29,500

2014-RIV-1242 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1243 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1244 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1245 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1246 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1247 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1248 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1249 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-1250 2 monitors 37,800 5,000 42,800

2014-RIV-1251 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1252 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

137

Page 141: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1253 2 investigators and 2

monitors 7,000 2,000 9,000

2014-RIV-1254 8 civilian monitors 124,761 9,375 134,136

2014-RIV-1255 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 643 26,203

2014-RIV-1256 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1257 2 monitors 22,249 2,000 24,249

2014-RIV-1258 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1259 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1260 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1261 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1262 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 0 643 643

2014-RIV-1263 2 monitors 115,020 15,000 130,020

2014-RIV-1264 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1265 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1266 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1267 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1268 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1269 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1270 2 monitors 21,300 1,500 22,800

2014-RIV-1271 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1272 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1273 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1275 6 monitors 52,100 2,400 54,500

2014-RIV-1276 1 officer; 4 monitors; 1 technician 41,648 1,286 42,934

2014-RIV-1277 5 monitors 90,000 40,000 130,000

138

Page 142: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1278 1 install; 2 monitors 60,000 5,000 65,000

2014-RIV-1280 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1281 2 monitors 14,707 51,120 65,827

2014-RIV-1282 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1283 2 monitors 24,550 1,100 25,650

2014-RIV-1284 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1285 2 monitors 96,000 1,800 97,800

2014-RIV-1286 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1287 4 monitors 51,380 700 52,080

2014-RIV-1288 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1289

12 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

108,000 12,000 120,000

2014-RIV-1290 6 monitors 54,000 6,000 60,000

2014-RIV-1291 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1292 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1293 2 monitors 24,450 1,100 25,550

2014-RIV-1294 Cost not available

2013-RIV-1295 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1296 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1297 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1298 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1299 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1300 10 officers 37,800 5,000 42,800

2014-RIV-1301 Cost not available

139

Page 143: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1302

1 officer; 3 civilian monitors; and 1

technician 59,580 3,815 63,395

2014-RIV-1303 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1304 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1305 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1306 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1307 1 monitor 10,000 2,000 12,000

2014-RIV-1308 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1309 2 monitors/interpreters 115,020 15,000 130,020

2014-RIV-1310 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1311 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1312 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1313 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1315 2 monitors 26,182 700 26,882

2014-RIV-1316 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1317

7 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation

133,480 9,375 142,855

2014-RIV-1319 2 monitors 17,300 2,400 19,700

2014-RIV-1320 4 monitors 51,120 2,400 53,520

2014-RIV-1321 1 officer and 1 technician 0 643 643

2014-RIV-1322 2 monitors 51,000 2,200 53,200

2014-RIV-1323 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1324 4 monitors per day 51,120 5,000 56,120

2014-RIV-1326 Cost not available

140

Page 144: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1327 0 0 2,500 2,500

2014-RIV-1328 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1329 2 monitors 24,000 9,600 33,600

2014-RIV-1330 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; 1 techinican 25,560 643 26,203

2014-RIV-1331 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1332 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-1333 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1334 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1335 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1336 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1337 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1338 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1339 10 officers 37,800 5,000 42,800

2014-RIV-1340 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1341 2 monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400

2014-RIV-1342 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1343 4 monitors 51,120 2,400 53,520

2014-RIV-1344 1 officer; 4 monitors;and 1 technician 76,680 3,858 80,538

2014-RIV-1345 2 monitors 22,698 5,000 27,698

2014-RIV-1346 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1347 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1348 7 persons used re

installation and monitoring

25,936 2,460 28,396

2014-RIV-1349 Cost not available

141

Page 145: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1350 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1351 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1352 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1353 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1354 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1355 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1356 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1357 2 monitors 8,520 1,200 9,720

2014-RIV-1358 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1359 1 monitor 0 2,500 2,500

2014-RIV-1360 2 monitors 30,482 1,700 32,182

2014-RIV-1361 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1362 1 officer; 2 civilian monitors; 1 technician 17,040 1,286 18,326

2014-RIV-1363 1 officer; 2 civilian

monitors; and 1 technician

25,560 1,286 26,846

2014-RIV-1364

7 persons used re installation, monitoring

and transcript preparation.

157,500 10,000 167,500

2014-RIV-1365 2 monitors 2,500 32,000 34,500

2014-RIV-1366 1 officer; 4 monitors; and 1 technician 25,560 2,000 27,560

2014-RIV-1367 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1368 Costs related to R1-13-0168

2014-RIV-1369 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1370 2 monitors 25,560 1,600 27,160

2014-RIV-1371 4 monitors per day 52,364 2,300 54,664

142

Page 146: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1372 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1373 2 monitors 48,000 3,200 51,200

2014-RIV-1374 2 monitors/translators 102,240 15,000 117,240

2014-RIV-1375 2 Spanish monitors 44,000 2,800 46,800

2014-RIV-1376 6 civilian monitors 87,416 10,200 97,616

2014-RIV-1377 2 monitors 49,100 3,200 52,300

2014-RIV-1378 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1379 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1380 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1381 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1382 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1383 2 monitors 13,891 775 14,666

2014-RIV-1384 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1385 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1386 2 monitors per day 25,560 1,600 27,160

2014-RIV-1387 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-1388 2 monitors 65,000 2,500 67,500

2014-RIV-1389 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1390 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1392 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1393 4 monitors 3,600 4,000 7,600

2014-RIV-1394 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1395 2 Spanish monitors 22,000 1,400 23,400

2014-RIV-1396 Cost not available

143

Page 147: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1398 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1399 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1400 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1401 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1402 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1403 4 monitors 39,028 2,400 41,428

2014-RIV-1404 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1405 1 officer; 4 civilian

monitors;and 1 technician

50,880 1,286 52,166

2014-RIV-1406 2 monitors 60,378 6,800 67,178

2014-RIV-1407 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1408 1 monitor and 1 supervisor 18,144 2,500 20,644

2014-RIV-1409 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1410 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1411 1 monitor per day 2,000 14,000 16,000

2014-RIV-1412 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1413 6 monitors 60,000 4,500 64,500

2014-RIV-1414 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1415 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1416 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1417 2 monitors 25,691 876 26,567

2014-RIV-1418 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1419 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1420 Cost not available

144

Page 148: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1421 2 monitors 28,724 5,950 34,674

2014-RIV-1423 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1424 2 contract linguists 41,894 1,120 43,014

2014-RIV-1425 2 monitors and installers 25,000 2,000 27,000

2014-RIV-1426 2 monitors/interpreters 76,680 15,000 91,680

2014-RIV-1427 2 Spanish monitors 66,000 5,400 71,400

2014-RIV-1428 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1429 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1430 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1431 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1432 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1433 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1434 2 monitors 13,608 2,500 16,108

2014-RIV-1435 6 monitors 4,942 300 5,242

2014-RIV-1436 6 monitors 117,500 5,000 122,500

2014-RIV-1437 2 monitors 24,550 625 25,175

2014-RIV-1438 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1439 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1440 1 monitor; 1 supervisor 27,216 2,026 29,242

2014-RIV-1441 2 monitors 16,200 2,500 18,700

2014-RIV-1442 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1443 1 monitor 0 2,500 2,500

2014-RIV-1444 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 1,704 643 2,347

145

Page 149: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1445 1 officer; 2 monitors;

1 technician 8,520 643 9,163

2014-RIV-1446 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1447 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1449 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1451 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1452 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1453 2 monitors 11,901 1,750 13,651

2014-RIV-1455 6 monitors 100,000 7,050 107,050

2014-RIV-1456 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1457 3 monitors 11,076 930 12,006

2014-RIV-1458 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1459 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1460 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1461 2 monitors 1,200 25,560 26,760

2014-RIV-1463 2 monitors 26,182 1,700 27,882

2014-RIV-1464 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1466 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1467 2 monitors 25,691 775 26,466

2014-RIV-1468 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1470 2 monitors 26,183 700 26,883

2014-RIV-1471 2 monitors 24,000 1,600 25,600

2014-RIV-1472 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1473 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1474 2 Spanish monitors 66,000 5,400 71,400

146

Page 150: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1475 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1476 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1477 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1478 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1479 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1480 2 monitors 14,484 1,800 16,284

2014-RIV-1481 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1482 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1483 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2013-RIV-1484 1 officer; 4 monitors; and 1 technician 51,120 1,929 53,049

2014-RIV-1485 2 monitors 25,691 1,775 27,466

2014-RIV-1486 2 monitors 104,252 22,500 126,752

2014-RIV-1487 6 monitors 76,680 7,800 84,480

2014-RIV-1488 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1489 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1490 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1491 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1492 4 monitors 74,124 6,750 80,874

2014-RIV-1493 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1494 4 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1495 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1496 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1497 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1498 5 monitors 26,412 1,810 28,222

147

Page 151: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1499 1 officer; 2 monitors;

1 technician 25,560 643 26,203

2014-RIV-1500 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1501 2 monitors 33,129 3,100 36,229

2014-RIV-1502 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1503 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1504 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1505 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1506 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1507 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1508 4 monitors 86,560 4,325 90,885

2014-RIV-1510 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1511 2 monitors 26,183 700 26,883

2014-RIV-1512 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1513 2 monitors; 1 installer 60,000 6,000 66,000

2014-RIV-1514 2 monitors 36,000 4,000 40,000

2014-RIV-1515 6 monitors 76,680 3,600 80,280

2014-RIV-1516 2 monitors 26,182 2,600 28,782

2014-RIV-1517 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 25,560 643 26,203

2014-RIV-1518 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1519 4 monitors 49,100 3,300 52,400

2014-RIV-1520 8 monitors 72,000 8,000 80,000

2014-RIV-1521 2 monitors 6,983 2,500 9,483

2014-RIV-1522 5 monitors 35,784 2,020 37,804

2014-RIV-1523 2 monitors 26,782 1,600 28,382

148

Page 152: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1524 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1525 2 monitors 44,000 3,600 47,600

2014-RIV-1526 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1527 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1528 3 monitors 25,560 1,600 27,160

2014-RIV-1529 2 monitors 25,891 876 26,767

2014-RIV-1530 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1533 2 monitors 66,000 5,400 71,400

2014-RIV-1534 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1535 2 monitors 24,550 1,100 25,650

2014-RIV-1538 2 monitors 24,000 3,200 27,200

2014-RIV-1539 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1540 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1541 1 officer; 2 monitors; and 1 technician 42,600 1,286 43,886

2014-RIV-1542 2 monitors 11,000 2,300 13,300

2014-RIV-1544 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1545 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1546 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1547 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1549 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1550 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1551 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1552 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1553 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

149

Page 153: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Riverside (cont’d) 2014-RIV-1554 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1555 5 monitors 60,131 5,800 65,931

2014-RIV-1557 1 monitor 26,051 825 26,876

2014-RIV-1558 4 monitors 123,540 6,700 130,240

2014-RIV-1559 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1561 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1563 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1565 1 DEA agent; 2 wire monitors 28,624 2,600 31,224

2014-RIV-1568 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1569 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1570 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1571 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1572 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1573 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1574 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1575 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1576 2 monitors 104,752 22,500 127,252

2014-RIV-1577 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1581 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1582 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1586 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-RIV-1587 Cost not available

2014-RIV-1589 2 monitors 26,690 700 27,390

Riverside Total 16,295,999 1,876,999 18,172,998

150

Page 154: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Sacramento 2014-SAC-54 35 detectives, patrol, civilian staff 52,402 6,431 58,833

2014-SAC-56 5 detectives, monitors 22,650 572 23,222

2014-SAC-57 25 detectives and translators 127,000 21,000 148,000

2014-SAC-59 Costs related to WT-14-04

2014-SAC-60 25 detectives 95,000 15,000 110,000

2014-SAC-61 Costs related to WT-14-04

Sacramento Total 297,052 43,003 340,055

San Bernardino 2014-SBD-538 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-539 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-540 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-542 1 officer; 1 monitor 70,000 2,000 72,000

2014-SBD-543 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-544 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-545 4 monitors 66,700 5,400 72,100

2014-SBD-546 1 officer; 1 monitor 140,000 4,000 144,000

2014-SBD-547 2 officers; 2 monitors 67,007 2,100 69,107

2014-SBD-548 2 officers; 4 monitors 84,000 2,000 86,000

2014-SBD-549 2 officers; 2 monitors 56,000 2,000 58,000

2014-SBD-550 1 officer; 2 monitors; 1 technician 17,040 7,643 24,683

2014-SBD-551 13 officers 43,920 5,000 48,920

2014-SBD-552 1 officer; 2 monitors 70,000 4,000 74,000

2014-SBD-553 1 officer; 4 monitors 300,000 12,000 312,000

2014-SBD-554 1 officer; 3 monitors 95,000 6,000 101,000

2014-SBD-555 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

151

Page 155: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

San Bernardino (cont’d) 2014-SBD-557 1 officer; 2 monitors 70,000 6,000 76,000

2014-SBD-558 1 officer, 2 monitors 70,000 4,000 74,000

2014-SBD-559 1 officer; 1 monitor 50,000 2,000 52,000

2014-SBD-560 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-561 6 officers; 2 technicians 38,640 1,000 39,640

2014-SBD-562 60,312 2,000 62,312

2014-SBD-563 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-564 6 officers 38,640 1,000 39,640

2014-SBD-566 16 officers 50,000 10,000 60,000

2014-SBD-567 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-569 16 officers 50,000 30,000 80,000

2014-SBD-570 2 monitors 18,000 2,000 20,000

2014-SBD-571 16 officers 50,000 40,000 90,000

San Bernardino Total 1,667,259 168,143 1,835,402

San Diego 2014-SD-180 translation, monitoring service 25,500 250 25,750

2014-SD-181 1-4 monitors/8 hr shift x 2 shifts/day 65,867 13,550 79,417

2014-SD-182 Costs related to 14-12 (Eicos 2014-SD-190)

2014-SD-183 Costs related to 14-07 (Eicos 2014-SD-185)

2014-SD-185 2 monitors per day 27,000 600 27,600

2014-SD-186 8 linguists 54,646 3,391 58,037

2014-SD-187 Costs related to 14-13 (Eicos 2014-SD-188)

2014-SD-188 8 linguists 54,646 3,391 58,037

2014-SD-189 Costs related to 14-12 (Eicos 2014-SD-182)

152

Page 156: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

San Diego (cont’d) 2014-SD-190 average of 4 monitors at

two 8 hour shifts/day 81,647 4,768 86,415

2014-SD-191 20 police officers 70,956 1,474 72,430

2014-SD-192 5 monitors; 7 linguists 197,476 4,270 201,746

2014-SD-193 Costs related to 14-04 (Eicos 2014-SD-192)

2014-SD-195 Costs related to 14-11 (Eicos 2014-SD-191)

San Diego Total 577,738 31,694 609,432

San Joaquin 2015-SJ-36 Cost not available

2015-SJ-37 Cost not available

2015-SJ-38 Cost not available

2015-SJ-39 Cost not available

2015-SJ-40 Cost not available

2015-SJ-41 Cost not available

2015-SJ-42 Cost not available

2015-SJ-43 Cost not available

2015-SJ-44 Cost not available

2015-SJ-45 Cost not available

2015-SJ-46 88,000 4,000 92,000

2015-SJ-47 Cost not available

2015-SJ-48 Cost not available

2015-SJ-49 Cost not available

2015-SJ-50 Cost not available

2015-SJ-51 Cost not available

2015-SJ-52 Cost not available

2015-SJ-53 Cost not available

San Joaquin Total 88,000 4,000 92,000

153

Page 157: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Santa Barbara 2014-SBA-46 7 monitors; 1 technician 35,504 2,520 38,024

2014-SBA-47 30,000 0 30,000

2014-SBA-48 9,000 0 9,000

2014-SBA-49 12,384 0 12,384

Santa Barbara Total 86,888 2,520 89,408

Santa Clara 2014-SCL-71 monitors and switch costs 237,000 4,968 241,968

2014-SCL-72 Costs related to WT 14-01

2014-SCL-74 4 monitors 22,554 3,159 25,713

2014-SCL-75 2 monitors 11,554 1,284 12,838

2014-SCL-76 Costs related to WT 14-07

2014-SCL-77 Costs related to WT 14-07

2014-SCL-78 Costs related to WT 14-07

2014-SCL-79 Costs related to WT 14-07

2014-SCL-80 2 monitors a day; 16 monitors total 65,424 6,560 71,984

2014-SCL-81 4 monitors 22,894 625 23,519

2014-SCL-82 2 monitors 11,894 625 12,519

2014-SCL-83 4 monitors 22,894 1,284 24,178

2014-SCL-84 installation and 17 law enforcement officers

monitoring wire 275,000 15,000 290,000

Santa Clara Total 669,214 33,505 702,719

Sonoma 2014-SON-6 Cost not available

2014-SON-7 16 deputies; 2 HIDA agents 0 2,000 2,000

Sonoma Total 0 2,000 2,000

Stanislaus 2014-STA-63 2 monitors per day 22,000 1,500 23,500

154

Page 158: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Stanislaus (cont’d) 2014-STA-64 3 monitors 5,040 1,000 6,040

2014-STA-65 2 monitors per day 44,000 1,500 45,500

2014-STA-67 5 monitors per day 44,000 7,000 51,000

2014-STA-68 2 monitors per day 22,000 1,500 23,500

2014-STA-69 monitors 14,678 300 14,978

2014-STA-70 3 monitors 44,000 3,000 47,000

2014-STA-71 Costs related to 14-08

2014-STA-72 Costs related to 14-08

2014-STA-73 Costs related to 14-08

2014-STA-74 Costs related to 14-08

2014-STA-75 Costs related to 14-08

2014-STA-76 Costs related to 14-08

2014-STA-77 Costs related to 14-08

Stanislaus Total 195,718 15,800 211,518

Tulare 2014-TUL-8 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

2014-TUL-9 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

2014-TUL-10 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

2014-TUL-11 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

2014-TUL-12 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 40,000 35,138 75,138

2014-TUL-13 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 20,000 22,893 42,893

2014-TUL-14 wire, monitor, and manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

2014-TUL-15 wire, monitor, manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

155

Page 159: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Tulare (cont’d) 2014-TUL-16 wire, monitor,

manpower costs 20,000 22,569 42,569

2014-TUL-18 surveillance teams, conduit monitors 213,700 6,000 219,700

2015-TUL-19 install, monitor, and prepare transcripts 43,600 3,000 46,600

Tulare Total 457,300 225,014 682,314

Ventura 2013-VE-74 2 monitors 39,948 2,262 42,210

2014-VE-84 9 88,000 14,750 102,750

2014-VE-85 2 monitors 61,271 2,200 63,471

2014-VE-86 66,000 13,250 79,250

2014-VE-87 2 monitors 10,331 402 10,733

2014-VE-88 4 monitors 44,000 4,500 48,500

2014-VE-89 2 monitors 47,351 1,094 48,445

2014-VE-90 2 monitors; 1 technician 6,500 2,500 9,000

2014-VE-91 4 monitors 44,000 6,500 50,500

2014-VE-92 1 monitor 6,390 2,925 9,315

2014-VE-93 1 monitor;

1 transcriptionist; 1 installer

5,869 3,575 9,444

2014-VE-94 5 95,000 11,000 106,000

2014-VE-95 15 322,000 26,400 348,400

2014-VE-96 35 monitoring detectives 98,000 4,000 102,000

2014-VE-97 10 144,000 18,600 162,600

2014-VE-98 11 monitors; 1 technician;

1 transcriptionist 0 18,736 18,736

2014-VE-99 4 monitors 4,500 8,000 12,500

2014-VE-100 6 92,000 6,000 98,000

156

Page 160: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 6 Costs of Electronic Interceptions

During Calendar Year 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction EICOS No.

Nature and Quantity of

Personnel Used Personnel Cost ($)

Resource Cost ($) (Installation Fees,

Supplies, Equipment, etc.)

Total Cost ($) (Personnel + Resource)4

Ventura (cont’d) 2014-VE-101 multiple monitors and

interpreters. 60,156 3,850 64,006

2014-VE-102 4 46,000 2,400 48,400

2014-VE-103 5 monitors 12,000 12,500 24,500

2014-VE-104 2 monitors 24,500 2,800 27,300

2014-VE-105 4 monitors; 6 detectives 78,000 1,200 79,200

2014-VE-106 45,000 0 45,000

2014-VE-109 2 monitors 500 600 1,100

2014-VE-110 4 monitors 26,258 1,400 27,658

2014-VE-111 1 monitor; 3 transcriptionists 26,000 1,500 27,500

2014-VE-113 3 monitors; 1 technician 25,597 3,992 29,589

Ventura Total 1,519,171 176,936 1,696,107

Total (all reporting counties) 27,952,560 3,141,596 31,094,156

157

Page 161: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 7 Jurisdiction Reporting No

Electronic Interception Activity During Calendar Year 2014

Alpine Marin Santa Cruz

Amador Mariposa Shasta

Butte Mendocino Sierra

Calaveras Modoc Siskiyou

Colusa Mono Solano

Del Norte Monterey Sutter

Glenn Nevada Tehama

Humboldt Plumas Trinity

Imperial San Benito Tuolumne

Inyo San Francisco Yolo

Lake San Luis Obispo Yuba

Lassen San Mateo

158

Page 162: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions

Conducted in Prior Years 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction

Report Year

Date of Application

Reference No.

EICOS No.

Cost ($)

Persons Arrested

Motions to Suppress Persons Convicted

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Gra

nted

D

enie

d P

endi

ng

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Alameda 2013 2/5/2013 13-02 13-02 1 4 Conspiracy;

unlawful firearm possession

Contra Costa 2009 1 Narcotics

2013 6/3/2013 13 Gangs; firearms; conspiracy 0 0 3 7 1 Firearms; gangs

2013 3 narcotics and firearms 3 Narcotics and

firearms

Kern 2013 13-05 3 USC 841(a) and 846 3 USC 841(a) and

846

Los Angeles 2006 06-126 4 Conspiracy;

possession for sales of cocaine 1 Possession for

sales of cocaine

2006

06-191, 06-230, 06-241, 06-255, 07-04,

07-23, 07-33, 07-133, 07-132, 07-136, 07-

179,

10 Attempted murder; conspiracy 1 10

Attempted murder;

conspiracy

2008 2/22/2008 08-31 8 Narcotics 6 Narcotics

2009 6/3/2009 09-87 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2009 7/21/2009 09-114 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2009 9/2/2009 09-151 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2009 9/24/2009 09-168 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2009 10/14/2009 09-183 3 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 5 3 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2009 09-152, 10-218, 10-

10, 10-23 1 Murder 1 1 Murder

2009 09-152 1 1 1 Murder

2009 09-27, 09-39 1 Murder 1 1 Murder

159

Page 163: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions

Conducted in Prior Years 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction

Report Year

Date of Application

Reference No.

EICOS No.

Cost ($)

Persons Arrested

Motions to Suppress Persons Convicted

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Gra

nted

D

enie

d P

endi

ng

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2010 10-226, 11-24 3 1 3 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2010 10-188 3 Murder; conspiracy 1 1 Murder;

conspiracy

2010 10-184 4 Murder; assault 1 3 Murder, assault

2010 10-61 1 Murder 1 1 Murder

2011 9/8/2011 11-11 3 Conspiracy; narcotics 1 3 Narcotics

2011 10/13/2011 11-155 3 Conspiracy; naroctics 2 Conspiracy;

naroctics

2011 5/11/2011 11-79 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics

2011 11/7/2011 11-196 3 Conspiracy; naroctics 2 Narcotics

2011 9/1/2011 11-162 5 Conspiracy; naroctics 1 Narcotics

2011 1/2/2011 11-44 1 Narcotics; weapons 1 Narcotics;

weapons

2011 9/29/2011 11-191 4 Narcotics; conspiracy Narcotics;

conspiracy

2011 6/1/2011 11-117 1 Narcotics; conspiracy Narcotics;

conspiracy

2011 11-49 4 Cnspiracy;

possession for sales of cocaine 4

Conspiracy; possession for

sales of cocaine

2011 8/2/2011 11-152, 11-178, 4 Narcotics trafficking 1 1 Accessory after

the fact

2011 11-30 1 Murder; accessory 1 1 Murder; accessory

2012 4/13/2012 12-50 2 Narcotics 2 Narcotics

2012 7/20/2012 12-115 4 Narcotics 4 Narcotics

160

Page 164: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions

Conducted in Prior Years 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction

Report Year

Date of Application

Reference No.

EICOS No.

Cost ($)

Persons Arrested

Motions to Suppress Persons Convicted

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Gra

nted

D

enie

d P

endi

ng

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2012 7/27/2012 12-78 2 Conspiracy;

narcotics 2 Narcotics

2012 1/13/2012 12-05 2 Narcotics 1 Narcotics

2012 1/1/2012 SW-2012-0088 2 Narcotics trafficking 2 Narcotics

trafficking

2012 12-72 4

Conspiracy; possession for

sales of methamphetamine

1 Conspiracy

2012 12-23, 12-45, 12-45 Ext 1, 12-52, 12-68 3 Burglary 1 3 Burglary

2012 12-64 2 Murder 1 2 Murder

2012 10-02 1 Murder 1 1 Conspiracy

2012 12-74 2 Murder; attempted murder 1 2

Murder; attempted

murder

2012 12-74 1 Murder 1 1 Murder

2013 2/8/2013 13-14 3 Narcotics 3 Narcotics

2013 2/7/2013 13-16 5 Narcotics 3 Narcotics; firearm

2013 3/4/2013 13-25 2 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2013 5/3/2013 13-76 2 Narcotics; conspiracy 1 Narcotics;

conspiracy

2013 1/2/2014 SW-2012-013 1 Narcotics trafficking 1 Narcotics

trafficking

2013 13-162 1 Attempted murder 1 1 Assault

2014 10/31/2012 12-265 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics

2014 6/11/2010 10-125 2 Narcotics 2 Narcotics

161

Page 165: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 8 Summary of Supplemental Reports for Interceptions

Conducted in Prior Years 2014

Reporting Jurisdiction

Report Year

Date of Application

Reference No.

EICOS No.

Cost ($)

Persons Arrested

Motions to Suppress Persons Convicted

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Gra

nted

D

enie

d P

endi

ng

Num

ber

Offe

nse(

s)

Los Angeles (cont’d) 2014 8/21/2012 12-135 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics

2014 5/4/2011 11-66 2 Narcotics 2 Narcotics

2014 4/18/2014 14-44 1 Narcotics 1 Narcotics

2014 4/14/2014 14-41 1 Narcotics trafficking 1 Narcotics

trafficking

2014 7 Narcotics 1 Narcotics

2014 5/15/2013 13-126 (Riverside) 7 Narcotics trafficking 0 1 1 6 Narcotics

trafficking

San Diego 2009 07-68, 07-70, 07-73 2 Murder; kidnapping

2012 12-10, 12-16, 12-22 2012-SD-137 1 Narcotics

2012 12-19, 12-24 2012-SD-149 1 Narcotics and

gangs

2012

11-42, 11-44, 12-05, 12-08, 12-18, 12-20, 12-25, 12-28, 12-31

2012-SD-159 2 Narcotics

2013 13-14 2013-SD-171 2 Voluntary

manslaughter

Sonoma 2014 8/14/2014 1 Murder 0 0 0 0 0 0

162

Page 166: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 9 List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed

Calendar Year 2014

Electronic Interception Orders Approved and Installed But Never Used

Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Installed

2014-FR-10 13-05 (Alameda)

2014-FR-12 2014-LA-785

2014-LA-837 2014-LA-846

2014-LA-865 2014-LA-875

2014-RIV1509 2014-MAD-11

2014-SAC-55 2014-MAD-14

2014-SAC-58 2014-RIV-978

2014-SBD-541 2014-RIV-979

2014-SBD-556 2014-RIV-1015

2014-RIV-1038

2014-RIV-1069

2014-RIV-1077

2014-RIV-1105

2014-RIV-1107

2014-RIV-1126

2014-RIV-1140

2014-RIV-1147

2014-RIV-1159

2014-RIV-1189

2014-RIV-1228

2014-RIV-1230

2014-RIV-1274

163

Page 167: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Table 9 List of Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Used or Installed

Calendar Year 2014

Electronic Interception Orders Approved and Installed But Never Used

Electronic Interception Orders Approved But Never Installed

2014-RIV-1279

2014-RIV-1314

2014-RIV-1325

2014-RIV-1448

2014-RIV-1462

2014-RIV-1560

2014-SD-194

164

Page 168: CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC INTERCEPTIONS REPORT · Kings 2 2 60 35 18 0 Los Angeles 129 129 3 37 36 30 4969 4672 36 0 Madera 8 8 222 222 28 0 Merced 1 1 2 2 18 63 63 63 0 Napa 1 1 30 5

California Electronic Interceptions Report Annual Report to the Legislature 2014

Appendix A: Penal Code section 629.62

“Report by Attorney General” (a) The Attorney General shall prepare and submit an annual report to the Legislature, the Judicial Council, and the

Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts on interceptions conducted under the authority of this chapter during the preceding year. Information for this report shall be provided to the Attorney General by any prosecutorial agency seeking an order pursuant to this chapter.

(b) The report shall include all of the following data: (1) The number of orders or extensions applied for. (2) The kinds of orders or extensions applied for. (3) The fact that the order or extension was granted as applied for, was modified, or was denied. (4) The number of wire or electronic communication devices that are the subject of each order granted. (5) The period of interceptions authorized by the order, and the number and duration of any extensions of

the order. (6) The offense specified in the order or application, or extension of an order. (7) The identity of the applying law enforcement officer and agency making the application and the person

authorizing the application. (8) The nature of the facilities from which or the place where communications were to be intercepted. (9) A general description of the interceptions made under the order or extension, including (A) the number

of persons whose communications were intercepted, (B) the number of communications intercepted, (c) the percentage of other communications intercepted, and (d) the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used in the interceptions.

(10) The number of arrests resulting from interceptions made under the order or extension, and the offenses for which arrests were made.

(11) The number of trials resulting from the interceptions. (12) The number of motions to suppress made with respect to the interceptions, and the number granted or

denied. (13) The number of convictions resulting from the interceptions and the offenses for which the convictions

were obtained and a general assessment of the importance of the interceptions. (14) Except with regard to the initial report required by this section, the information required by paragraphs

(9) to (13), inclusive, with respect to orders or extensions obtained in a preceding calendar year. (15) The date of the order for service of inventory made pursuant to Section 629.68, confirmation of

compliance with the order, and the number of notices sent. (16) Other data that the Legislature, the Judicial Council, or the Director of the Administrative Office of the

United States Courts shall require. (c) The annual report shall be filed no later than April of each year, and shall also include a summary analysis of the

data reported pursuant to subdivision (b). The Attorney General may issue regulations prescribing the content and form of the reports required to be filed pursuant to this section by any prosecutorial agency seeking an order to intercept wire or electronic communications.

(d) The Attorney General shall, upon the request of an individual making an application, provide any information

known to him or her as a result of these reporting requirements that would enable the individual making an application to comply with paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 629.50.

165


Recommended