www.qog.pol.gu.se
The quality of public sector organizations has proved to be highly significant for economic growth, poverty reduction, reduced income inequality, improved health etc.
How do we get there? -National characteristics -International dimension
Capacity-Building and Reform in Developing Countries: Linking Policy and Politics
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Outline
• Introducing ourselves & our research:– Key questions– Background– Main Findings– Future Research– 3 Take-Away Points
• Discussant • Q&A
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Background: The State & Human Welfare
• What we know:– Strong capable democracies are the most welfare
enhancing form of political organization
• What we don’t know: – How do you get it?
• The West followed one particular recipe:– First state became strong, then democratic
• Developing countries today following another:– Democratizing first, before becoming strong
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Research Question
• Key Research Question:– What are the consequences for human development of
‘reverse sequencing’ (democratizing before the state becomes strong)?
• Main Research Finding:Reverse sequencing can lead to more corruption, lower
administrative capacity (i.e. states that are democratic but not strong & capable)
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Democracy and Administrative Capacity in the World
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Research Findings
Mechanisms: Democracies can’t use coercion to solve collective action
problems & it becomes harder to state-build• Concrete case study: Taxation in Rwanda & Lesotho
Democracy changes elite-ruler relations, destabilizing rulers & increasing the importance of patronage (corruption)Concrete case study: Food Security Policy in Malawi
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Taxation in Rwanda & Lesotho
• Question:– Are there differences in how they go about collecting tax in
Rwanda (autocracy) compared to Lesotho (democracy)?
• Methods:– Interviews with RRA & LRA officials & detailed process tracing
• Findings:– Rwanda – use tax as a form of state-building to extend control of
state over population (eg. aggressively extending tax-net). Have succeeded in increasing direct taxes.
– Lesotho – avoid using tax to state-build - ‘too politically sensitive’ (instead emphasize voluntary compliance). Have not succeeded in increasing direct taxes, still reliant on trade
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Food Security Policy in Malawi 1964-2009
• Question:• How did democratization impact on food security in Malawi?
• Methods:• Diachronic comparison before & after multi-party elections in 1994
• Findings:• Democratization destabilized elite-ruler relations which led to:
– Fragmentation of policy making, as it became arena for elite competition
– Undermined capacity of bureaucracy to implement, as patronage increased
– Affected relationship with donors, concerned about corruption– Grain sold to Muluzi supporters → shortages
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Future Research
• Party Systems & Elite Behaviour: are consolidated parties the missing link in containing elite behaviour & connecting elites to voters?– Compare Kenya & Ghana
• Taxation & Democracy: has democracy made governments more accountable to private sector than to voters?– Quantitative Study of all 48 African countries
www.qog.pol.gu.se
3 Main Take Away Points
1) The West followed one particular recipe:– Strong first, democratic second
Developing countries today following another:– Democratizing first
2) This may not lead to the same outcome:– Reverse sequencing can lead to more corruption, lower
administrative capacity
3) We need to think more critically about the component parts of good governance – democratic institutions, bureaucracy, rule of law – and how sequencing in development of these institutions matters
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Background: Administrative reforms in developing countries
• The main research discourse Do not transfer Western models to developing countries– Bad experiences – Build on local knowledge and local circumstances – Significant adjustments
• Routine explanation
• A lack of empirical studies on public officials
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Key research questions
• How do public officials (i.e. public auditors) perceive what is legitimate structures and practices?
• How do they reform their organizations?
• How may problems of implementation be understood?
www.qog.pol.gu.se
The State Audit Case (Riksrevisioner)Research Design and Data
• Three parts: 1. Arenas 2. NAO Namibia3. NAO Botswana
• Methods – Observations (ap.100h + informal conversations)– Document studies – Personal interviews (59 with 46 persons)
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Main findings
• Arenas – Harmonization in line with international (Western) standards– When gap between international and local, discussed how
to change the local norms • NAO Namibia & Botswana
– Continuous change to achieve higher compliance with standards
• Problems of implementation – Underestimation of time and support needed– Management– Motivation
www.qog.pol.gu.se
Future Research
• Professionalization of public sector officials in African countries
• The role and impact on audit on public sector performance:– Quantitatively: Cross-country comparative research,
developing + developed countries– Qualitatively: The dynamic interplay between audit and non-
state actors
www.qog.pol.gu.se
3 Main Take Away Points
1) Professionals & Actors: - International instead of West – Africa- Not merely historic legacies & local conditions shape
attitudes and action, identities are more dynamic
2) Sharing common understandings and practices –enables cooperation, internationally – regionally
3) Be critical to routine explanations: Ground conclusions on empirical work