+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Capital Budgeting

Capital Budgeting

Date post: 31-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: elan
View: 31 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Capital Budgeting. Arguing for your project. Arguing for your project. Capital budgeting CFO receives proposals from divisions Projects described by cash flows. Arguing means applying measures. Net present value is the right measure. Many smart people use the wrong ones. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
40
Capital Budgeting Arguing for your project
Transcript
Page 1: Capital Budgeting

Capital Budgeting

Arguing for your project

Page 2: Capital Budgeting

Arguing for your project

Capital budgeting CFO receives proposals from divisions Projects described by cash flows

Page 3: Capital Budgeting

Arguing means applying measures

Net present value is the right measure. Many smart people use the wrong

ones. Alternative ways to the same end.

Page 4: Capital Budgeting

Uses of measures

Project acceptance Mutually exclusive alternatives.

Page 5: Capital Budgeting

Capital Budgeting Techniques

Kim, Crick, and Kim, Management Accounting

Nov. 1986, p. 49-52

Page 6: Capital Budgeting

Survey of use of measures by corporations

Measure Primary Secondary

Internal rate of return 49% 15%Accounting rate of return 8% 19%Net present value 21% 24%Payback period 19% 35%Other 17% 7%

Total responses 587 469

Page 7: Capital Budgeting

Make no mistake

NPV is the right measure always. Others work sometimes. NPV measures value to owners, their

wealth.

Page 8: Capital Budgeting

Objectives of a good measure

Value cash flows. Respond to the market.

Page 9: Capital Budgeting

NPV’s merits

Values cash flows as the market does. Responsive because the discount rate

is the current market rate. Measures increase in shareholder

value.

Page 10: Capital Budgeting

Payback period is

The time required for undiscounted cash flows to add up to the initial investment.

e.g., build a Wendy’s if it “pays for itself” in two years or less.

Page 11: Capital Budgeting

Payback merits

Based on cash flows

Page 12: Capital Budgeting

Payback defects

No market response.When r is high, payback period should be shorter.

Subtracts time-t dollars from time-0 dollars, a cardinal sin.

Ignores cash flow after payback. Ignores timing during payback.

Page 13: Capital Budgeting

Defects are not necessarily fatal

Repeated, similar investments. Stable financial conditions.

Page 14: Capital Budgeting

The well-informed capital budgeter knows

When to accept payback period as a measure.

When it is likely to fail.

Page 15: Capital Budgeting

Accounting rate of return

Doesn’t value cash flows No market response Ignores market values Scaling problems: melons or malls

Page 16: Capital Budgeting

Merits of accounting r.o.r.

Easily understood. Sometimes okay in stable markets. Smart application can overcome

defects.

Page 17: Capital Budgeting

Internal rate of return

Definition: IRR is the discount rate that makes NPV = 0

CFCF

r

CF

r

CF

rTT0

1 221 1 1

0

( )

. . .( )

That is, IRR is the r such that

Page 18: Capital Budgeting

Internal rate of return

Definition: IRR is the discount rate that makes NPV(r) = 0.

NPV(r) is a function. RWJ Figures 6.4 and 6.5.

Page 19: Capital Budgeting

Project

Time 0 1 2 3Cash flow -200 100 100 100

Page 20: Capital Budgeting

Figure 6.4: NPV(r)=0 at r=23.37%

NPV

r

100

NPV(r)

NPV(.1) = 48.68520

.1

IRR =23.3748.685

Page 21: Capital Budgeting

Figure 6.4

NPV (r) = 0 at r = 23.37%

Page 22: Capital Budgeting

Applications of IRR measure

Hurdle rate = market rate Project acceptance: Accept a project if

IRR > hurdle rate. Mutually exclusive projects: Take the

one with the highest IRR (> hurdle rate)????? Don’t rely on it.

Page 23: Capital Budgeting

Project acceptance:

NPV and IRR give the same conclusion when ...

Cash flows have one sign change. In the example: IRR = 23.37% > hurdle

= 10% for an investment project. IRR = 23.37% < hurdle rate = 30% for a

financing or “borrowing from nature” project.

Page 24: Capital Budgeting

Merits

Uses cash flows. Responds to the market when the

hurdle rate changes

Page 25: Capital Budgeting

Objective

Learn to recognize the times when NPV and IRR are the same.

and also the problems with IRR

Page 26: Capital Budgeting

Defects of IRR -- project acceptance

Lending to nature or borrowing from her?

Multiple IRR's may occur.

Page 27: Capital Budgeting

Financing (borrowing from nature)

Seek IRR < hurdle rate Same as NPV > 0

Page 28: Capital Budgeting

Multiple IRR's

Time in decades 0 1 2Cash flows -1 5 -6

Page 29: Capital Budgeting

IRR’s at r = 1 and r = 2

100% per decade = 7.17735% per year. 200% per decade = 11.61232% per

year.

Page 30: Capital Budgeting

IRR’s at r=1 and r=2.

NPV

r

100% 200%

Page 31: Capital Budgeting

Descartes’ Rule

The number of internal rates of return is no more than the number of sign changes.

Page 32: Capital Budgeting

Defects of IRR -- mutually exclusive projects

Ignores market values. Scale problems -- melons or malls.

Page 33: Capital Budgeting

Typical hour exam question

What is the scale problem in using IRR to choose between mutually exclusive projects?

Page 34: Capital Budgeting

Scale problem in IRR

Time 0 1 IRR NPV(r=.1)Little dam -100 200 1 81.8181…Big dam -1000 1500 0.5 363.6363…

One canyon, one dam.

Page 35: Capital Budgeting

Sketch of answer

The smaller dam has the higher IRR. The big dam has higher value. The big dam extends consumption

possibility of owners more than the little dam does.

It is wrong to take the higher IRR in this case.

Page 36: Capital Budgeting

Scale problems in IRR

Time 0 1 IRR NPV(r=.1)

Littledam

-100 200 1 81.8181...

Bigdam

-1000 1500 .5 363.63...

Page 37: Capital Budgeting

More answer

Consider the project of replacing the little dam by the big dam.

Cash flows are -900, +1300. IRR of the project is 4/9 = .4444 > .1 NPV is 281.8181… So replace the little dam. Capital budgeting jiu jitsu.

Page 38: Capital Budgeting

r

NPV

50% 100%

100

500

Big dam

Little dam

IRR IRR

Page 39: Capital Budgeting

Big dam, little dam

NPV

NPV of the big dam

NPV of the small dam

500

100

.51

r

r*

For hurdle rates below r*,the big dam is preferred.

r* = .4444...

Page 40: Capital Budgeting

Recommended