of 14
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
1/14
Global Strategic Management
December, 2006
Case AnalysisEmbraer: The Global Leader in Regional Jets
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
2/14
Page 2 of 14
Introduction
This case analysis examines the major issues and ideas from the HBS case Embraer:
The Global Leader in Regional Jets1 and identifies the key attributes and characteristics
of a successful international aircraft company from Brazil. Despite many challenges and
the fact that Embraer is based in a developing country, Embraer has grown into one of the
worlds most successful airplane manufacturers. This paper discusses the nature of the
aircraft industry and competition, the key elements of Embraers strategy, how Embraer
is adapting to address future market changes. Finally, the paper analyzes the paradox of
Embraers rise and explores what that may imply about its home country.
Overview of the Commercial Aircraft Industry
Porters Five Forces framework2 provides a convenient way to analyze the dynamics
of the commercial aircraft industry. The figure below shows a high level view of the key
forces, barriers to entry, supplier power, buyer power, rivalry and the threat of
substitution. This brief analysis does not take into account the military jet, corporate jet
and the emerging tiny jet markets that also impact the strategies of aircraft
manufacturers.
Barriers to Entry are extremely high with large initial capital investments required along with
extremely high fixed costs. Additionally, highly skilled workers are required and learning
curves for workers and companies are long. Because the value chain is highly integrated, that
is partners and suppliers work very closely with the incumbent manufacturers, a new entrant
is at a distinct disadvantage. There is a high degree of customer loyalty, coupled with very
high switching costs for customers.
Supplier Power is variable. Suppliers with proprietary technology or extremely specialized
expertise have high power. Suppliers of certain special materials and coatings also have high
power. Some commodity suppliers of materials and services have relatively low power.
Buyer Power is extremely high causing severe pricing pressure on aircraft manufacturers.
The industry often experiences periods of over capacity which puts further downward
pressure on prices. Customer preference and flying trends may help bolster the power of
buyers in negotiating with manufacturers who have long development cycles and may have
inventory which may not meet the current trends and needs of the buyers. On the other hand,
switching costs for buyers are very high and have a fairly long time horizon.
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
3/14
Page 3 of 14
Threat of Substitutes are low with no cost effective alternatives available for commercial jets.
Industry Rivalry is very high with two major duopolies dominating the industry: Airbus vs.
Boeing in large jets and Embraer vs. Bombardier in regional jets. Long development lead
times mean that every new model is critical to the success of the vendor and any misstep
could spell disaster. Long development lead times mean rivals can plan counter-moves well
in advance and catch an emerging trend while a competitor may already be committed to a
certain direction.
SUPPLIER POWER
Specialized SuppliersImportance of supplier partnerships
Impact of inputs on cost or differentiation
Lack of substitute inputs
Some Threat of forward integration
Ample set of technology providers
BARRIERS
TO ENTRYVery High Costs of EntryInitial Capital Investment
High Fixed Costs
Long Learning curveGovernment support requiredSkilled Engineers/TechnicalBrand LoyaltyCustomer Switching CostsAccess to technology partners(Integrated Value Chain)Incumbent RetaliationProprietary Products
RIVALRY
Strong rivalry between playersDuopolies in 2 segments
(Boeing vs. Airbus Large Jets
Embraer vs. Bombardier Regional Jets)
Cyclical Industry
Intermittent Overcapacity
High Switching Costs
Brand identity
Long Development CycleTimes
(Rivals can plan counter-moves)
THREAT OF
SUBSTITUTESNo compelling or adequate
substitutes for commercial jets:
Trains
Automobiles
Ships
Helicopters
Customer Switching Costs arevery high
BUYER POWER
Customers - Bargaining leverage
Buyer Power is High
Buyer has transparent information
Brand identity
Price sensitivity
Require Product differentiation
Buyer concentration vs. industry
Buyers' incentives(option)
Diagram of Porter's Five Forces for the Commercial Aircraft Industry
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
4/14
Page 4 of 14
Core Elements of Embraers Strategy
Embraers core strategy can be summarized by the following bullets:
Interdependence with Brazilian Government
Focus on Regional Jet MarketFamily Approach to Product Development
Cultivate relationships and risk share with technology partners and parts suppliers
Focus on Intelligent Systems, Engineering Project Management
Risk Partner and Supplier Strategy
Intelligent Systems
Interdependence with Brazilian Government
Embraer was founded by the Brazilian government and the company is a source of
national pride. In 1994, after privatization, the Brazilian government continued to
provide subsidies in the form of loans to Embraer to provide capital funds to start new
initiatives. As quoted by Embraer CEO Botelho, We want to keep on being the
technological and industrial arm of the Brazilian government, although of course, we
have to make profits.1
Embraer recognizes the role its home country plays and the fact
the United States, home country to its largest customers, is not going to offer the type of
the support that the Brazilian government will provide.
Focus on Regional Jet Market
In the commercial aircraft market, Embraer produces planes exclusively for the
Regional Jet market. Embraer provides aircraft that are less expensive to produce and
operate than its main competitor, Bombardier. Airbus and Boeing make larger aircraft
and do not compete in the regional jet market. In the past few years, Embraer has
expanded its strategy to also focus on the 70 to 110 seat market as portrayed on their
website: www.ruleof70to110.com/main/index.html . Embraers campaign points out the
http://www.ruleof70to110.com/main/index.htmlhttp://www.ruleof70to110.com/main/index.htmlhttp://www.ruleof70to110.com/main/index.html8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
5/14
Page 5 of 14
inefficiencies of flying planes that are too large for regional flights or too small to handle
increasing demand. Their claim is that the 70 to 110 seat plane fills a void for customers.
Embraer not only provides less expensive planes, they have developed roomier planes
with innovations such as the double- bubble design8
that allows more head room and
larger cabin space for passengers. Another part of Embraers strategy is to use larger
regional jet aircraft to replace the aging fleet of planes that may be too large to operate on
the increasing number of short-haul routes. In a sense, Embraer is preparing to compete
with Airbus and Boeing, but their approach is subtle: create/identify the market, fill a
void and replace aging aircraft that are going to be retired.
Product Families
Embraers method of managing its product lines is based around families of
aircraft. Rather than developing a single model, Embraer designs it products based on
platforms than can be scaled to larger or smaller capacities allowing for parts reuse and
reduction of learning curves for its staff and the staff of its customers. This strategy
keeps costs low and improves time to market. The platform or family approach to
product management reduced time to market by two to three years, allowing Embraer
aircraft to be introduced in less than half the industry standard time that new plane
projects require6.
The platform approach to product management works hand in hand with Embraers
strategic partnership strategy. Embraers strategy can be broken into three parts6:
Choose Technology Areas aimed at product innovation and fulfilling theneeds/requirements of customers
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
6/14
Page 6 of 14
Identification of risk partners for supply of parts and subsystems (technologypackages)
Cultivation of local subcontractors for engineering services, chemical coatings,milling and other specialized aircraft technologies
Strategic Partnerships
For key technology areas, it is not important that Embraer manufacture every key
technology, but rather the company leverages its core capabilities in systems integration,
marketing and technical services coordinating the risk partnerships. The risk partners are
enlisted to supply key components of the aircraft and are required to invest their own
funds for development, thereby taking on some of the risk of the project. Partners are
rewarded if the project is successful in supplying primary components and spares for the
life of the new aircraft line. Most of the risk partners are located outside of Brazil, but
co-locate engineers in So Jos dos Campos. Local subcontractors are used extensively
for engineering services, milling, and coatings. Many of the local firms were founded by
former Embraer employees, resulting in an aircraft industry cluster.
Intelligent Systems
Instead of attempting to build an entire aircraft and develop all technologies within
Brazil, Embraer has chosen to focus on key aircraft technologies while building core
expertise in aerodynamics, fuselage and systems integration.6 The decision to focus on
the fuselage was driven partly because this technology could not be easily sourced
outside of Brazil and thus it provided a good area for Embraer to develop its own
expertise. This became part of Embraers determination not to outsource the aircraft
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
7/14
Page 7 of 14
cockpit nor anything that was not integral to its longer term strategy of concentrating on
the provision of intelligent systems1. Embraers recognition of the fact that increasing
its competency in systems integration is more important than the ability to create or
manufacture all of the technologies in an aircraft, provided it with a realistic approach to
competing globally.
Disruptive Innovation?
Another useful framework for analyzing the commercial aircraft industry and
Embraers strategy is from the point of view of disruptive technology described by
Clayton Christensen4. The commercial aircraft industry is dynamic and subject to the
effects of Porters five forces as described earlier. Vendors in this industry need to be
cognizant not only of economic factors that impact buyers (airlines) but also of
passenger preference trends. A keen awareness of passenger trends allows vendors to
understand market dynamics and sustain or improve their current position. Furthermore,
an appreciation of the role disruptive innovation may lead manufacturers to discover new
opportunities and grow future sales.
As applied to the aircraft industry, Christensens model could be represented as in the
graph below:
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
8/14
Page 8 of 14
From the analysis, Embraer could choose to compete with the Airbus 320 and Boeing
737 in some sectors. With superior operating margins, Embraer presents a compelling
case for airlines to consider Embraer aircraft to assemble lighter and more fuel-efficient
fleets. Based on the previous Porter analysis, the reaction of the incumbent vendors must
be considered. Although one would expect them to defend their turf, the Airbus 320
and Boeing 737 are larger aircraft and more expensive to operate. One could argue that
Embraer has already eaten into some of the market share that would have been been
attained by Airbus or Boeing by filling the 70 to 110 seat void with lower cost aircraft.
However, according to Embraer CEO Botelho, entering the 135 seat aircraft market is not
in the cards for Embraer as this would mean jumping into the big dogs market, a
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
9/14
Page 9 of 14
reference to Airbus and Boeing8. Rather, he would prefer to diversify into the defense
market and expand in the business jet market.
Alliances and PartnershipsA new strategic direction or logical outgrowth?
From their founding, Embraer formed strategic relationships with technology
partners. The first Embraer jet trainer licensed technology from the Italian firm
Aermacchi for a product to be used by the Brazilian Air Force. Other technology came
from the Brazilian Aeronautical Technical Centers (CTA) Institute of Research and
Development (IPD). Embraer learned to incorporate technology from different sources
while strengthening core competencies in intelligent systems, systems integration and
project engineering. The use of risk partners not only benefits Embraer from a
technological point of view, but also from a financial and capital structure point of view.
Based on Embraers past with the turbulent Brazilian economy of the early 1990s to
Botelhos restructuring in the middle 1990s, to the WTO dispute, Embraer has always
faced difficulties with respect to funding projects. In addition to the regional jet market,
Embraer participates in competition for defense business in Brazil and globally. While
Botelho would like to expand Brazils share of the defense business, his success has been
limited.
The 1999 announcement of a strategic alliance with a group of French aerospace
companies was a logical outgrowth of Embraers overall strategy of risk partnerships.
Embraer had already embarked on an effort to work with fewer key suppliers on the ERJ-
170/190 (only 26 vendors vs. 45 for the ERJ-145)6. The US defense market had proven
difficult to break into. An alliance could provide extra capital funding, technological
resources and credible partners to bolster business in this important sector not subject to
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
10/14
Page 10 of 14
WTO restrictions. Also, this move was consistent with Embraers core strategy to
develop Intelligence Systems. In the defense context, this translates to Intelligent
Defense Systems1.
The new alliance provides the capability for Embraer to transfer in technological
know-how for supersonic aircraft, and allows expansion into defense systems for naval
and ground support1. An alliance is also a good alternative to being acquired which
would most likely be defeated by government veto. Overall, in terms of diversification in
product lines, capital funding sources, and acquisition of new technological capabilities,
the alliance is a good fit and is consistent with Embraers core strategy.
A Global Leader from an Emerging Economy
According to Porter, Government cannot create competitive industries; only
companies can do that.7 In the case of Embraer, the role of government is to act as "a
catalyst and challenge. Embraer can credit part of its success to government-
sponsored institutional and technological developments dating back to the 1950s6.
Embraer implemented much of the IPD technology to its advantage but created its own
methods of technological innovation and internal learning to carry it forward. Embraer is
responsible for increasing the size and capabilities of the So Jos dos Campos region
and creating a local aircraft design cluster for Brazil.
Even with government help, the appearance of Embraer in a developing country such
as Brazil appears to be an anomaly. However, in the context of Porters analysis of the
Competitive Advantage of Nations, some of Brazils lack of endowments actually created
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
11/14
Page 11 of 14
the necessity out of which Embraer was born. For example, Brazil has large amounts of
land through difficult terrain and wide rivers but limited surface transportation
infrastructure. Aircraft are a natural way to overcome these challenges.
In applying Porters Diamond Framework to Embraer, we can analyze the success of
the company and attempt to understand the reasons for this success.
1. Firm Strategy, Structure and Rivalry
Embraer has no domestic rivals in the aircraft business. Embraer was founded by the
government and later was privatized. There is an active aircraft industry in the local
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
12/14
Page 12 of 14
suppliers to Embraer in So Jos dos Campos which mirrors the technology cluster
that the United States has in the area surrounding MIT.
2. Demand Conditions
Embraer has very demanding local and global customers. Locally, the Brazilian
Defense Force and Brazilian Airlines do not automatically choose Embraer. They
must compete and win on a level playing field. Brazils domestic buyers are just as
discerning as global buyers.
3. Related Supporting Industries
In So Jos dos Campos, Embraer enjoys geographic proximity to upstream and
downstream industries. This facilitates the exchange of information and promotes a
continuous exchange of ideas and innovations. These local suppliers are also free to
compete globally.
4. Factor Conditions
Brazil did not inherit any key factors to help them enter the aerospace business. After
World War II, highly skilled and specialized labor was cultivated. Embraer never had
easy access to capital or benefited from a strong Brazilian infrastructure. Over time,
Embraer has developed core competencies and has helped So Jos dos Campos to
grow, creating specialized factors and conditions helping to foster sustained
innovation and investment from overseas. These factors are difficult to duplicate and
have created competitive advantage.
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
13/14
Page 13 of 14
Implications for Brazil
Embraers success demonstrates that with the proper mix of government support,
strong corporate leadership and sound strategy, Brazilian companies can succeed
globally. Embraer is a great source of national pride for Brazil and serves as a shining
example of how a Brazilian company can compete on a global basis. However, the
company faced adversity and was able to overcome it through strong leadership,
partnerships with and incentives from the government, along with global risk partnerships
structured to allow technology and capital to flow into Embraer. By adding value and
leveraging technologies from other countries, Embraer was able to build its own core
competencies and achieve global leadership in the regional jet market. Other businesses
in Brazil are equal candidates for success, specifically satellite and fuel technologies. As
Porter points out, the government may act as a catalyst, but only companies can create
sustained competitive industries.
Managers that recognize the fact that their home nation is integral to their success will
promote continuous innovation while welcoming the formation of clusters of like
competitors to create national centers of excellence. These clusters will lead to what
Porter calls the Diamond of National Advantage which is a self-reinforcing construct
that is difficult for other nations to imitate. Ultimately, nations that wish to be
competitive effectively on a global basis need to realize that only companies can achieve
and sustain competitive advantage and that the capacity of its industry to innovate and
upgrade is essential. Armed with this knowledge, national policy makers can make
decisions to foster an environment conducive to supporting industries that will be able to
take advantage of the lessons described above.
8/2/2019 Case Analysis Embraer
14/14
Page 14 of 14
References
1. Embraer: The Global Leader in Regional Jets, Pankaj Ghemawat, Gustavo A.Herrero, Luis Felipe Monteiro, Harvard Business School, 9-701-006, October 20,2000
2. How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy, Michael E. Porter, HBR Article, March-April 1979.
3. Designing and Implementing a New Supply Chain Paradigm for AirplaneDevelopment, Yun Yee Ruby Lam, MIT, June 2005,https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34854
4. Global Collaboration and ImplementationWorld Aerospace Symposium-2005, TimBowler,www.aviationweek.com/conferences
5. The Innovators Dilemma, Clayton M. Christensen, Harper Business, 2000, NewYork
6. Transfer of Technology for Successful Integration into the Global Economy, A casestudy of Embraer in Brazil, Jos E. Cassiolato, Roberto Bernardes and Helena
Lastres, UNCTAD, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2002,
http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteipcmisc20_en.pdf
7. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Michael E. Porter, HBR 90211, 1990
8. The Little Aircraft Company that Could, Russ Mitchell, Fortune Magazine,November 14, 2005
9. Airbus vs. Boeing Revisted: international competition in the aircraft market, DouglasA. Irwin, Nina Pavcnik, Journal of International Economics, 28 August 2003,
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/airbus3.pdf
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34854https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34854http://www.aviationweek.com/conferenceshttp://www.aviationweek.com/conferenceshttp://www.aviationweek.com/conferenceshttp://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteipcmisc20_en.pdfhttp://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteipcmisc20_en.pdfhttp://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/airbus3.pdfhttp://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/airbus3.pdfhttp://www.dartmouth.edu/~dirwin/airbus3.pdfhttp://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteipcmisc20_en.pdfhttp://www.aviationweek.com/conferenceshttps://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34854