+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Case Study: pea phenotyping

Case Study: pea phenotyping

Date post: 13-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: sibyl
View: 59 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Case Study: pea phenotyping. Cooperators Funded evaluations Publication data mining Funded research projects Survey germplasm users (NCRPIS) Curator evaluations Publishable using augmented designs Data from other genebanks. A. Cooperators – CORE studies. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
13
Case Study: pea phenotyping A. Cooperators B. Funded evaluations C. Publication data mining D. Funded research projects E. Survey germplasm users (NCRPIS) F. Curator evaluations A. Publishable using augmented designs G. Data from other genebanks
Transcript

Case Study: pea phenotyping

A. CooperatorsB. Funded evaluationsC. Publication data miningD. Funded research projectsE. Survey germplasm users

(NCRPIS)F. Curator evaluations

A. Publishable using augmented designsG. Data from other genebanks

A. Cooperators – CORE studies

• Examples of published data in GRIN• Usually a subset of the pea CORE

– McPhee K.E. 2005. Variation for Seedling Root Architecture in the Core Collection of Pea Germplasm. Crop Sci. 45:1758-1763.

– McPhee K.E. and F.J. Meuhlbauer. 2000. Biomass production and related characters in the core collection of Pisum germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48: 195-203

B. CGC funded evaluations

• Aphanomyces– Malvick DK and J.A. Percich. 1999. Screening of Pea

Plant Introduction Collection for Resistance to Aphanomyces Root Root 1990-1994. Biological and Cultural Tests, Vol 11.

• Ascochyta blight– Kraft, J.M., Dunne, B., Goulden, D., and Armstrong, S.

1998. A Search for Resistance in Peas to Mycosphaerella pinodes. Pl Dis. Plant Dis 82:251-253.

• Fusarium root rot– Grunwald NJ., Coffman VA., Kraft JM.. 2003. Sources of

partial resistance to fusarium root rot in the Pisum core collection. Plant Disease 87:1197-1200.

• Fusarium wilt race 2– McPhee KE, Tullu A, Kraft JM, Muehlbauer FJ 1999.

Resistance to Fusarium wilt race 2 in the Pisum core collection. J. Amer. Soc.Hortic.Sci. 124:28-31.

• Mineral nutrients in seed– Grusak, M.A. et al., 2004. Novel approaches to

improve legume seed mineral nutrition. Proceedings of the 5th AEP-2nd ICLGG Conference, pgs. 37-38.

C. Data mining from

publications

• Crop Registrations – from JASHS and Crop Science– high quality peer-reviewed & replicated data

• Literature review– WEB of Science dbf– AGRICOLA dbf

• Sign up for Digitop https://d2.nal.usda.gov/login

D. Funding evaluation research projects

• USDA – FAS ($15,000/year, 3 yrs)– Seed weight and number in pea– www.fas.usda.gov/icd/grants/scrp.htm

• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development – funds scientific exchange visits– www.oecd.org/home/

0,2605,en_2649_201185_1_1_1_1_1,00.html• ARS Post-doctoral funding: pea SNPs

– 2 years, $50,000/year = $100,000– www.npstaff.ars.usda.gov/ARIS/Manual/

chapt15g.pdf• NRI (rejected so far, but they fund germplasm projects)

– http://www.csrees.usda.gov/funding/rfas/pdfs/06_nri.pdf

E. Survey stakeholders

• Ad hoc (polite for random): Large germplasm requests-ask if you may enter the data into GRIN after publication

• Systematic: once/year mail survey Western Region Advisory committee

• Systematic: Survey each germplasm order (NCRPIS)

• Discussion

F. Curator evaluations – design for publication

• Advantages: scientists will know the data is available with the experimental details – two examples

• Protein (cooperator ground seed, paid for gases for nitrogen analyzer) – core only– Coyne CJ, Razai L, Baik B-K, Grusak M.A. 2005. Variation for

pea seed protein concentration in USDA Pisum core collection. Pisum Genetics 37: (in press).

• Seed weight and seed number – core only– Replicated field trial, two locations, two years, too much

• Solution to too much– Work with statistician– Augmented designs

Field evaluations-design resources

• Book: Agricultural Field Experiments: Design and Analysis. RG Peterson. 1994. Marcel Dekker, NY.

• IPGRI. 2001. The design and analysis of evaluation trials of genetic resources collections. A guide for genebank managers. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 4. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.

• USDA ARS Area Office Statisticians• Ex. Western Regional, Albany, CA

Field evaluations-ARS resourcesPacific West Region example

PWA Statistical Support• Bruce E. Mackey, PWA & WHNRC

[email protected] (510) 559-6078

• Linda C. Whitehand WRRC & PGEC, [email protected] (510) 559-6077

Services offered in order of priority:1. Training in Statistics 2. Experimental Design3. Statistical Inference 4. Statistical Models and Methods 5. Data Analysis6. Data Salvage PC SAS - Distribution of the SAS software is through the

statisticians. Yearly licensing fees, are paid out of PWA funds and then charged back to each user

Field evaluations-6.4 Augmented designs

• Augmented designs are appropriate for evaluation stages when hundreds or even thousands of accessions are being studied in the same experiment, using a limited amount of sowing material perhaps enough for one replicate only.

• They cope with environmental heterogeneity by placing replicates of controls systematically in the experiment. As control plots may be said to keep a check on environmental variation, they have been called checks, and in this section we use check for control”.

• From IPGRI Technical Manual 4. http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/publications/pubselect.asp

Augmented designs: data analysis

• Manuals & Programs: Several programs, users manuals, and data examples can be downloaded:

• AMMI contains a manual, SAS codes, and data examples for performing the analysis of the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model of multi-environment trials and for constructing the biplot.

• UNREPLICATE includes a manual, SAS macro, and data for analyzing unreplicated trials where the repeated checks are arranged in incomplete blocks.

• SPATIAL has a manual and data for using the ASREML method for spatial analysis of field trials.

• BIPLOTS contains a manual, data, SAS codes, and examples for constructing GE biplots and GGE biplots obtained from AMMI and SREG models, respectively. These biplots delineate subsets of environments and genotypes with positive interaction.

• From www.cimmyt.org/english/wps/biometrics/index.htm • Other Reference book: Kang MS (ed) 2003. Handbook of

Formulas and Software for Plant Geneticists and Breeders. Haworth Press, New York.

Data analysis and presentation

• GRIN– Design descriptors during experimental design phase– Think about software for your analysis– SAS, TASSEL, GERMINATE

• Publication options– Crop Science– Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution– Euphytica – Plant Breeding– Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and

Utilization

G. Data from other genebanks

• Australia example:– Used IRRI’s ISIS database format– Downloaded all available data from SINGER and GRIN

on lentil and chickpea– www.iris.irri.org/ranjanweb/SiteMain.jsp

• Have not done in pea yet, but in discussion with other pea genebanks

• Funded project with ICRISAT- exchange chickpea data-failed.


Recommended