+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

Date post: 30-May-2018
Category:
Upload: cato-institute
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 51

Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    1/51

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    2/51

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    3/51

    owes its name to Catos Letters, a series of essays published in 18th

    century Great Britain that presented a vision of a society free from the

    tyranny of excessive government power. Those same ideals inspired the

    architects of the American Revolution and continue to inspire the

    work of the Cato Institute today. The Cato Institutes core mission is

    to advocate policies that preserve and expand individual sovereigntywhile decreasing the power of government to interfere with the lives

    and activities of peaceful individuals.

    Today many American political leaders, elected to be good stewards

    of public monies and protectors of freedom, instead have endangered

    the very essence of America with policies that destroy liberty, stifle the

    economy, and waste billions of dollars.

    Catos work to restore the vision of our nations founders is more

    important than ever.

    Americas founding generation created a new kind of nation, based

    on individual sovereignty, limited government, free commerce, and

    peace. In 2005 Cato continued to be a critical voice in the struggle to

    protect and advance these values, putting forward timely and practical

    policy proposals centered on our nations first principles.

    The Cato Institute

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    4/51

    essage

    2

    The Cato Institute enjoyed un-precedented financial success in 2005.With revenues in excess of $22 million,the Institute was able to erase the diffi-culties we and so many nonprofits hadexperienced in the wake of September11, 2001. A special $1 million gift toour Project on Global EconomicLiberty under the direction of Ian

    Vasquez will allow us to expand thateffort, which now includes websites inSpanish, Russian, and Arabic. Each ofthose sites has its own webmaster, isupdated daily, and affords readers awide array of classical liberal, free-market thinkers. Arab speakers, in par-ticular, are able to read for the firsttime classic writings from such giantsof freedom as John Locke, Thomas

    Jefferson, F. A. Hayek, Ludwig von

    Mises, Milton Friedman, and manyothers. The conflict in the Middle Eastwill ultimately be resolved with en-lightened discourse, not bullets.

    Were proud of our colleague TomPalmer, who has been a driving forcebehind the Arabic and Russian web-sites, along with Vasquez, who overseesthe popular Spanish site, elcato.org.Palmer visited Baghdad twice and hasbeen to several countries in the MiddleEast, South Asia, and Eastern Europeto promote liberty and work with like-minded scholars and activists. Vasquezand Palmer work closely with our long-time Russian friend Andrei Illarionov,former top economic adviser to Presi-dent Vladimir Putin. Illarionov quit his

    job at the Kremlin in protest of its poli-cies of curtailing both economic andpolitical liberties.

    The Cato Institutes internationalreputation has never been greater. We

    hope to create a Center for Global

    Liberty sometime in 2006. Of course,bullets and weapons are still part of thefight against Islamic extremism, butso, too, is a thoughtful foreign policythat recognizes the limits, not to saycounterproductivity, of an overly ag-gressive military posture around theworld. Hopefully, the influence of neo-conservatives in the foreign policyworld has waned in the wake of itsfailed predictions concerning militaryintervention in Iraq. The growingreputation of Catos foreign policyscholarsTed Galen Carpenter, ChrisPreble, and most recently, JustinLoganwill help light the way to amore peaceful international regime, onein which America is held in the highesteem it deserves.

    One concern we share is the grow-

    ing assault on free trade. The Demo-cratic Party, once a bastion of free trade,appears ready to capitulate to organ-ized labors demand that Americanconsumers be denied inexpensive prod-ucts from abroad. At a time of growinginternational tensions, protectionism isprecisely the wrong approach. Underthe guise of national security, some inCongress appear prepared to use the12-agency Committee on Foreign In-

    vestments in the United States to blockforeign investment. This is a dangerousdevelopment. Dan Griswold, directorof Catos Center for Trade PolicyStudies, and his colleague Dan Ikensonare leading the battle to protect freetrade. Vice President Brink Lindsey hasa book coming out in 2006 that willhelp move the debate in the right direc-tion, as well.

    On more positive notes, DanGriswolds study of immigration poli-

    cy has been the basis for the adminis-

    trations enlightened approach in thatarea. The idea of marginalizing 11 mil-lion immigrants (in the manner ofMuslims in France), much less crimi-nalizing them, is exceedingly shortsighted. We need to provide them withtemporary worker status and an even-tual road to citizenship. Only then willwe be in a position to secure our bor-ders and assimilate our immigrants. Inthe health policy field, we are pleasedwith the increasing recognition thatthird-party payers are a major sourceof escalating medical care costs anddeteriorating service. The concept ofHealth Savings Accounts, first pro-moted in a Cato book, is the solution,and were pleased that the administra-tion is moving forward with efforts toexpand the current system of HSAs.

    Healthy Competition, by Catos healthpolicy experts Michael Cannon andMichael Tanner, was well receivedin 2005.

    We have always believed in Lord Actons dictum that Power tends tocorrupt, and absolute power corruptsabsolutely. That is particularly true inthe kind of philosophical vacuum thatCato senior fellow and Nobel laureate

    James Buchanan has warned of.Absent the principles of individual lib-erty to guide policymakers, powerbecomes an end unto itself, and cor-ruption inevitably will follow. Fromthe pathetic case of Rep. DukeCunningham, to the scandalized GOPin Ohio, to the bipartisan scandals inCongress related to the Jack Abramoffaffair, corruption in politics appearsendemic. America deserves much bet-ter, particularly with the enormousproblems facing our great nation.

    The failure of Congress to reform

    from the President and the Chairman

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    5/51

    the bankrupt and demeaning SocialSecurity system and the utterly irre-sponsible addition of prescriptiondrug benefits to a hopelessly unfund-ed Medicare program are remarkableexamples of politicians being moreconcerned about reelection than doingwhat is right for this country.Something must be done about the

    vast incumbent protection systemfrom campaign finance laws to cooper-ative gerrymanderingto shake up

    Americas political system.We were pleased to receive a major

    grant from Gordon and Helen Smithto support an expanded senior fellowand visiting fellow program at Cato.We also made two significant addi-tions to our staff: Andrew Coulson,director of our Center for Educational

    Freedom, and Bob Garber, director ofmarketing. Coulson is widely regardedas one of the leading advocatesof freeing the educational system frompolitics and unions, and Garber wasfor the past six years in charge ofmarketing and public information forWashingtons Holocaust MemorialMuseum. We welcome them both.

    Finally, we are pleased to havelaunched Cato Unbound under theeditorship of Brink Lindsey and man-aging editor Will Wilkinson. CatoUnbound is a state-of-the-art virtualtrading floor in the intellectual mar-ketplace. It reflects our increasingcommitment to using the Internet inthe public policy arena.

    As always, we express our gratitudeto our dedicated colleagues and ourloyal Sponsors who share Catos com-mitment to liberty.

    William A. NiskanenChairman

    Edward H. CranePresident and CEO

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    6/51

    4

    Contents

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

    CATO

    INSTITUTE

    2005 ANNUALRE PO RT

    PAGE 6ADVANCING

    FIRST

    PRINCIPLES

    PAGE 10PROTECTING

    CONSTITUTIONAL

    LIBERTIES

    PAGE 14REFORMING

    THE POLITICAL

    PROCESS

    PAGE 18ROLLING

    BACK THE

    ENTITLEMENT

    STATE

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    7/51

    5C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    PAGE 22DEFENDING

    AMERICA,

    PROMOTING

    WORLD PEACE

    PAGE 26FREEING

    THE WORLD

    ECONOMY

    PAGE 32TAKING ON BIG

    GOVERNMENT

    CONSERVATIVES

    PAGE 36

    EXPANDING

    LIBERTYS

    MESSAGE

    PAGE 38

    EVENTS

    PAGE 40

    PUBLICATIONS

    PAGE 42

    CATO STAFF

    PAGE 44FELLOWS

    AND ADJUNCT

    SCHOLARS

    PAGE 46

    FINANCES

    PAGE 47

    INSTITUTIONAL

    SUPPORT

    PAGE 48

    CATO CLUB 200

    INSIDE BACK

    COVER

    BOARD OF

    DIRECTORS

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    8/51

    We hold theseTruths to beself-evident, thatall Men are created

    equal, that theyare endowedby their Creatorwith certainunalienable Rights,that among theseare Life, Liberty,

    and the Pursuit ofHappinessThat tosecure these Rights,Governments areinstituted amongMen, deriving their

    just Powers from

    the Consent ofthe Governed.

    DECLARATION OFINDEPENDENCE

    ADVANCING

    FIRST

    PRINCIPLES

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    9/51

    Founders were inspired by the principles ofindividual liberty, free enterprise, and ahealthy skepticism of government power.They created a Constitution of enumeratedpowers designed to leave most decisions inthe hands of individuals and their local rep-resentatives. The federal government waslimited to those few powers necessary toprotect the basic rights of the people andunite the new nation.

    Today, Americans have forgotten manyof those core principles. The federal govern-ment is involved in every area of Americanlife, and every social problem provokes apublic cry for more government involve-ment. At the Cato Institute, scholars workto show that government intervention is

    not only ineffective and inefficient but thatunwarranted government power poses athreat to the cherished rights of life, liberty,and property.

    Throughout the year, Cato hosts semi-nars and forums to increase awareness of

    Americas rich history and to bring the ideasof liberty to the public. Catos central educa-tional program is Cato University, directedby senior fellow Tom G. Palmer. Cato

    University consists of a home-study coursea series of audio recordings and readingsdesigned to provide an introduction to liber-tarian ideasand annual seminars aroundthe country.

    Cato hosted three Cato University semi-nars in 2005. In April Rep. Edward Royce (R-CA), Duke University economist MichaelMunger, and other faculty taught AppliedEconomics: User Friendly Tools to

    Understand Politics, Business Enterprise,

    and Life. In June Anne Applebaum of theWashington Post,Jeffrey Hummel of San JosState University, Steve Davies of ManchesterMetropolitan University, and others taughtThe History and Philosophy of Liberty andPower. And in October, at The Art ofPersuasion: Skills for Everyone, Reasonmagazines Nick Gillespie, the National

    Reviews Deroy Murdock, and several Catoscholars gave participants tools for convinc-ing friends, strangers, and politicians of the

    value of liberty.Senior fellow and director of Cato

    University, Tom Palmer is one of Catosmost active ambassadors of liberty. In 2005,he lectured and debated at Yale University,Duke University, Georgetown University,

    and other colleges, educating students onglobalization, free trade, and the history ofliberty. He gave a public lecture in Moscowon the origins of European liberalism, spon-sored by Catos Russian language website,Cato.ru, and traveled to Iraq twice to addressgroups of Iraqi citizens and governmentofficials about how to foster a culture offreedom in their new democracy. Palmer dis-cussed the role of property rights in free

    markets and the disastrous consequences ofprice controls with reporters from Voice of

    Kurdistan and other Iraqi media.Cato legal scholars Roger Pilon, Mark

    Moller, Timothy Lynch, and Robert A. Levyare respected lecturers at the nations toplaw schools. Pilon spoke about constitution-al law, the judicial nomination process, reli-gious liberty, and property rights atHarvards Kennedy School of Government,

    the Aspen Institute, and law schools at

    7

    Americas

    At Cato University, participants

    heard speeches on liberty

    from Deroy Murdockof

    the National Review, Pulitzer

    Prize-winning authorAnne

    Applebaum, and Cato schol-

    ars including David Boaz,

    Ed Crane, Dan Griswold,

    andTom Palmer.

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    ,

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    10/51

    8

    Columbia, NYU, and elsewhere. Levydebated terrorism and civil libertiesat Harvard Law School and discussedgun rights litigation and federalismin other appearances. Cato scholarscontinue to help ensure that law stu-dents receive a Madisonian perspec-tive to provide balance to their lawschool educations.

    After more than a decade withouta Supreme Court vacancy, the nationsaw three nominations to fill theseats opened by Justice OConnorsretirement in July and the death of

    Chief Justice Rehnquist in Septem-ber. Catos legal experts weighed inon the nominees in appearances onPBS, MSNBC, Court TV, and CNN.In the Wall Street Journal, Cato seniorfellow Randy E. Barnett characterizedthe nomination of Harriet Miers tothe Court as cronyism, and Catosdirector of constitutional studiesRoger Pilon told the Washington Post,

    I know of nothing in Harriet Mierssbackground that would qualify herfor an appointment to the SupremeCourt. At a December Hill Briefing,What to Look for in the AlitoHearings, Pilon cautioned that thenominee might be too deferential toexecutive power.

    Roger Pilon testified before a sub-committee of the Senate Committee

    on Homeland Security and Govern-ment Affairs in October about theabuse of federal power: Search theConstitution as you will, you willfind no authority for Congress toappropriate and spend federal fundson agriculture, disaster relief, retire-ment programs, housing, healthcare, day care, the arts, public broad-castingthe list is endless. Pilons

    opinions on the Constitution andthe judicial nomination process wereread by millions this year in the WallStreet Journal, Legal Times, and theNewYork Post.

    Since its inception, the CatoInstitute has made a concerted effortto train and educate promisingyoung scholars and professionals inthe ideas of liberty. Cato sponsorsmore than 60 interns each year whoreceive hands-on training in research,advocacy, fundraising, and outreach.Cato interns have gone on to full-

    time jobs at prominent nonprofitorganizations and on Capitol Hill,and others continue to lead libertari-an organizations at colleges and uni-

    versities across the country. InNovember, Catos intern debate teambeat interns from the HeritageFoundation and other public policyorganizations in the Young Profes-sionals Speak debate competition.

    Catos government relations staffleads a series of seminars each sum-mer for Capitol Hill interns, combin-ing documentary films with lecturesby Cato scholars to introduce futureHill staffers to the ideas of liberty.Cato also provides complimentarycopies of Cato Audio, Cato Handbookon Policy, and other publications tocongressional offices in an effort to

    bring the principles of liberty to thehalls of Congress.Catos international team has

    made great strides in disseminatingthe key documents of classical liberalthought to the non-English-speakingworld.Libertarianism: A Primer,execu-tive vice president David Boazs 1997book, has been translated into sevenforeign languages, including Rus-

    ACLU President Nadine Strossen

    addresses the importance of freedom

    of religion during the B. Kenneth Simon

    lecture at Catos Constitution Day

    conference. Deroy Murdocktells a

    Cato University audience how to use

    The Art of Persuasion. Nick Gillespie

    ofReasonextols the virtues of choice

    at a Cato University seminar.

    A D V A N C I N G F I R S T P R I N C I P L E S

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    11/51

    9

    sian, Japanese, and Czech. Arabic,Spanish, and Chinese translationsare under way.

    ElCato.org, Catos Spanish lan-guage website, continues to garnermore than 65,000 hits each monthfrom journalists, academics, and layreaders in Latin America and Europe.Its Spanish translations of Cato stud-ies and special features by Latin

    American contributors were citedmore than 500 times in the Spanishlanguage media in 2005.

    Cato launched two other foreign

    language websites in 2005. In August,Cato.ru began offering Russian lan-guage translations of the works ofFriedrich Hayek and other timelessdocuments of freedom. Catos Arabicwebsite (www.lampofliberty.org) waslaunched in October as an initiativeof Catos Jack Byrne Project onMiddle East Liberty. The website hasmade the works of Adam Smith,

    Frederic Bastiat, John StuartMill, Hayek, and many others avail-able in Arabic for the first time.

    Advertisements on Middle Eastern newssites are actively promoting Catos

    Arabic website. The Byrne Projectwill also provide Arabic and Kurdishtranslations of books by FredericBastiat and Hayek to Iraqi libraries.

    Catos web presence was expanded

    in 2005 with the December launchofCato Unbound (www.cato-unbound.org), a new web magazine featuringmonthly debates on important in-tellectual issues. In the first issue,The Living Constitution: Amend-ments for the 21st Century, NobelLaureate James M. Buchanan proposedamending the U.S. Constitution tolimit government spending, prevent

    discriminatory lawmaking, and pro-tect the right of voluntary exchange.

    Akhil Reed Amar, a law professorat Yale and author of AmericasConstitution: A Biography; Judge AlexKozinski of the U.S. Court of Appealsfor the Ninth Circuit; and Cato Insti-tute chairman William A. Niskanenoffered their commentary. Futureissues of Cato Unbound will tacklesuch questions as Is Old EuropeDoomed? and Can There Be aLiberal/Libertarian Alliance?

    For limited government to suc-

    ceed, the public must understand theprinciples on which it is based. TheCato Institute continues to educatestudents, government officials, thelegal community, and the generalpublic about the dangers of en-croachments on freedom and theadvantages that liberty can bring toall people.

    We have allowed[the powers of the

    federal government]to expand beyondall moral and legalboundsat the priceof our liberty andour well-being. Thetime has come toreturn those powers

    to their properbounds, to reclaimour liberty, andto enjoy the fruitsthat follow.

    ROGERPILONSTESTIMONY BEFORE THE

    SENATE COMMITTEE ON

    HOMELAND SECURITY ANDGOVERNMENT AFFAIRS,OCTOBER25, 2005

    Senior fellowTom G. Palmerdiscusses

    effective public speaking in a Cato

    University talk titled From Pericles to

    the Digital Age: Why Liberty Rests on

    Persuasion. Roger Pilon, vice president

    for legal affairs, testifies before Congress

    on the constitutional limits of government.

    A D V A N C I N G F I R S T P R I N C I P L E S

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    12/51

    We the People ofthe United States,in order to form amore perfect Union,

    establish Justice,insure domesticTranquility, providefor the commondefence, promotethe general Welfare,and secure the

    Blessings of Libertyto ourselves andour Posterity, doordain and establishthis Constitutionfor the United Statesof America.

    CONSTITITION OFTHE UNITED STATESOF AMERICA

    PROTECTING

    CONSTITUTIONAL

    LIBERTIES

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    13/51

    The 2004-2005 Cato Supreme

    Court Reviewfeatures articles

    by leading constitutional scholars

    on the Madisonian legal tradition

    and analysis of recent Supreme

    Court cases. Distinguished

    contributors, including Richard

    A. Epstein, James W. Ely Jr.,

    and Marci Hamilton discuss

    private property rights, the First

    Amendment, international judi-

    cial precedents, and the rights

    of criminal defendants.

    gives the government certain powers to helpachieve important national priorities, suchas protecting citizens from harm and stimu-lating economic growth. However, the U.S.government sometimes oversteps its boundsin pursuit of those goals, violating the con-stitutional protections of some of our mostbasic rights. Cato scholars have pointed outrepeatedly over the years that individualrights are paramount in the Constitutionand must be respected in the nations laws.

    In 2005 the Supreme Court handeddown several decisions in key civil libertiescases. In February, Cato filed an amicus briefin the case of Kelo v. City of New London inwhich private homeowners were attemptingto stop the city of New London from using

    eminent domain to condemn their homesand transfer titles to a private developmentcorporation. In a Policy Analysis titledRobin Hood in Reverse: The Case againstTaking Private Property for EconomicDevelopment, George Mason Universitylaw professor Ilya Somin wrote, Such tak-ings are usually the product of collusionbetween large and powerful interests andgovernment officials against comparatively

    powerless local residents. Somin demon-strated how the harms of such takings toindividuals and the institution of propertyrights far outweigh any economic benefitsthey promise.

    When the Supreme Court ruled in Junethat the government could seize privateproperty and transfer it to other privatepartiesnot for public use, as theConstitution requires, but simply for a pub-

    lic benefitthe backlash was immediate.

    Americans were incensed that their propertycould be taken from them, and liberals andconservatives alike lined up to denounce thedecision. Cato constitutional scholars RogerPilon and Mark Moller appeared on radioand television, explaining the implicationsof the decision and urging lawmakers tolimit the eminent domain power to its con-stitutional bounds. Pilon testified beforea House committee, demonstrating that

    Kelo was a misreading of the Constitutionbut adding that Congress could end manyof the abuses of eminent domain simply byending the government-funded projectsthat lead to the abuses. Federal and state leg-islation is now in play to better protect pri-

    vate property, as recommended in a

    December Policy Analysis, The Birth of theProperty Rights Movement.

    In a victory for domestic economic lib-erty, the Supreme Court in May ruled thatstates could not erect trade barriers againstdirect-to-consumer shipments of winefrom out-of-state wineries. The majoritydecision in Granholm v. Heald cited evi-dence from Regulating Wine by Mail, anarticle from the Fall 2004 issue of

    Regulation magazine, on the economics ofwholesale wine sales and the nature of thestate law being challenged.

    The exercise of many constitutionalrights entails a fundamental right to privacy.But the federal War on Drugs seems recent-ly to be a war on the rights of ordinary citi-zens to be left alone and the authority ofstates to regulate areas of public life not del-egated to the federal government. President

    Bush, who during the 2000 campaign said

    The Constitution

    11C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    14/51

    P R O T E C T I N G C O N S T I T U T I O N A L L I B E R T I E S

    12 C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

    We should notwait until ourconstitutionallevees collapse

    to appreciatethe danger thatthe laws of warpose to freedomin America.

    TIM LYNCH,NATIONALLAWJOURNAL,OCTOBER3, 2005

    Cato senior fellow Randy Barnett

    recounts how federal constitutional

    authority has shifted from a small

    list of enumerated powers to an

    assumption of nearly unlimited

    federal power. Other Constitution

    Day speakers echoed Barnett's call

    for stricter federalism. Cato seniorfellow Mark Mollermoderates a

    Constitution Day panel discussion.

    of medicinal marijuana, I believeeach state can choose that decision asthey so choose, directed the JusticeDepartment to assert the federal gov-ernments power to prosecute mari-

    juana patients who produce or usemarijuana in accordance with theirstates laws. Despite the efforts ofCato senior fellow Randy E. Barnett,who argued the case before theSupreme Court on behalf of cancerpatient Angel Raich, the Court ruled

    in June that the federal governmentcan go after such patients. The NewYork Times quoted Roger Pilon, direc-tor of Catos Center for Constitu-tional Studies, as calling the decisiona disaster and Justice AntoninScalia, who supported it, a fair-weather federalist.

    Sick people must increasingly fearthe government even if the medicine

    they require is legal. At a Septemberconference, Drug Cops and Doc-tors: Is the DEA Hampering theTreatment of Chronic Pain? Dr.Linda Paey told the story of her hus-band Richard, who is currently serv-ing a 25-year prison sentence becauseFloridas drug laws left him no legalway to get the prescription medica-tion he needs to control intractable

    pain. Paey later appeared on 60Minutes to discuss the persecution ofpain patients. Ronald T. Libbys JunePolicy Analysis, Treating Doctors asDrug Dealers: The DEAs War onPrescription Painkillers, detailed thecoercive methods that the DEA usesto intimidate and harass doctors whospecialize in pain management, pre-

    venting millions of Americans fromgetting the medical care they needto alleviate their pain. John Tierney

    of the New York Times cited Libbysstudy in a July column, charging thatthe DEA goes after doctors becausethey are easier to catch than illegaldrug dealers.

    Fighting terrorism has been usedas a rationale for curtailing the civilliberties of American citizens and for-eign nationals within our borders.Catos Project on Criminal Justice

    has documented numerous viola-tions of the law and the Constitution.

    The case of suspected terrorist Jose Padilla illustrates how the Billof Rights has been circumvented inthe War on Terror. If the presidentprevails in his argument that he canhold Padilla and other suspected ter-rorists without charging them with acrime, the right of all Americans to be

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    15/51

    presumed innocent until proven guiltyis at risk. Cato scholars have spokenout against the enemy combatantdesignation in USA Today, the NewYork Times, and other media outlets.

    Catos director of informationpolicy studies, Jim Harper, is a mem-ber of the Department of HomelandSecuritys Data Privacy and Integrity

    Advisory Committee and is influenc-ing the administration to use newtechnologies in a responsible man-ner. Harper is also writing a bookabout identification and how efforts

    to create a National ID system willthreaten privacy and liberty. Harperhas been advocating against unwar-ranted surveillance and governmentdata-mining programs, thoughPresident Bush has stood by his asser-tion that he has the authority to uni-laterally authorize warrantless wire-taps of Americans communications.

    In September, Catos Center for

    Constitutional Studies hosted itsannual Constitution Day Confer-ence, which featured analysis of the

    just-completed Supreme Court termby leading constitutional scholars.Nadine Strossen, president of the

    American Civil Liberties Union andprofessor of law at New York Law

    School, discussed the Constitutionsreligion clauses in the fourth annualB. Kenneth Simon Lecture. Strossenlikened the countrys growing accept-ance of government entanglementwith religion to the increasing will-ingness to submit to intrusive search-es of persons and properties: the factthat such invasions into private lifeare equally applied against all, shesaid, doesnt make them acceptable.

    The fourth annual Cato SupremeCourt Review, released at the confer-ence, highlighted the erosion of

    important federalist precedents.Pepperdine Universitys DouglasKmiec, writing about Gonzales v.

    Raich, lamented the brake the Courtput on its recent revival of federalism,while Vanderbilts James Ely Jr. exco-riated the Court for its three propertyrights decisions.

    Cato scholars continue to fightefforts to expand the power of govern-

    ment to interfere with constitutionalliberties. On property rights, privacy,and other constitutional issues, Catoexperts will continue their work tosecure the blessings of liberty to our-selves and our posterity.

    P R O T E C T I N G C O N S T I T U T I O N A L L I B E R T I E S

    13C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    Well-placed,well-connected

    special interestsget togetherwith localgovernmentsat the expenseof propertyowners, andsmall businesses

    to carry outtheir plans.

    ROGERPILON,FOXNEWS, YOUR WORLDWITHNEIL CAVUTO,

    JUNE 23, 2005

    Oklahoma attorney general Drew

    Edmondson laments the Drug Enforce-

    ment Administrations persecution of pain

    doctors. He and 47 other state attorneys

    general have signed a resolution calling

    on the DEA to balance combatting diver-

    sion of prescription drugs with measures

    to protect effective pain treatment.

    Dr. Linda Paey advocates for patients

    rights to medical treatment.

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    16/51

    I am not anadvocate forfrequent changesin laws and constitu-

    tions, but laws andinstitutions mustgo hand in handwith the progressof the human mind.As that becomesmore developed,

    more enlightened,as new discoveriesare made, newtruths discoveredand manners andopinions change,with the change

    of circumstances,institutions mustadvance also tokeep pace withthe times.

    THOMASJEFFERSON

    REFORMING

    THE POLITICAL

    PROCESS

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    17/51

    government is based on the rules and limitsset forth in the Constitution. For govern-ment to serve the needs of the people, how-ever, citizens must be encouraged to takean active role in the political process.Government must be transparent enoughto allow scrutiny by the general public andsmall enough to allow thorough monitor-ing of its activities.

    Cato Institute scholars have long encour-aged policies that would increase citizen par-ticipation in the democratic process. In1984, Cato published The Federal ElectionCommission: A Case for Abolition, whichwarned that restrictions on campaignfinancing would limit free speech. Through-out the 1990s Cato papers advocated term

    limits to increase competition in elections,reduced spending in both federal and statebudgets, and the abolition of governmentprograms that limit individual freedom.In 2005 scholars from Catos Center forRepresentative Government continued toreceive media and scholarly attention fortheir consistent defense of smaller, moreaccessible government.

    Politicians across the country are prepar-

    ing for congressional and local elections in2006, and the two major parties are workinghard to raise money for the most competi-tive races. In many races, however, candi-dates benefit from public campaign fund-ing. In a Cato book called Welfare for

    Politicians, editor John Samples, director ofCatos Center for Representative Govern-ment, shows that public financing of elec-tions does not reduce corruption, nor does

    it increase political participation among

    taxpayers, most of whom do not support giv-ing their tax dollars to political candidates.

    The same people who believe that taxpay-ers should be forced to pay for political cam-paigns to reduce the corrupting influence ofmoney in politics have taken steps to blockprivate groups from expressing their opin-ions on political campaigns. At a HillBriefing in May, Should We Ban 527s?

    John Samples and campaign finance lawyersRobert Bauer and Cleta Mitchell agreed thatall citizens have the right to spend money topropagate political ideas.

    Partisan groups on both sides of thepolitical spectrum fight restrictions on theirown candidates freedom of speech while fil-ing lawsuits to prevent their opponents sup-

    porters from expressing their views. TheCato Institute has been one of the few con-sistent voices arguing for the principleexpressed best by Voltaire, who said, I maydisagree with what you say, but I will defendto the death your right to say it. At a forumfor his book Speaking Freely: Trials of the First

    Amendment, renowned constitutional lawyerFloyd Abrams commended Cato for itsunswerving advocacy of free speech in all its

    forms. Abrams speech was republished inthe Fall issue ofCatos Letter.

    Former federal election commissionerBradley Smith became well accustomed todealing with contradictions during histime in Washington. At a September PolicyForum, Smith compared electoral politics tothe world ofAlice in Wonderland, where wordsmean the opposite of what they seem tomean and people believe impossible things.

    Citizen participation in the political process,

    In the Fall 2005 issue

    ofCatos Letter, Catos

    quarterly speech digest,

    First Amendment lawyer

    Floyd Abrams discussed

    campaign finance regulation

    and other restrictions on

    political speech. Abrams

    lamented that few partisans

    on either the left or right are

    steadfast in supporting

    freedom of speech. Although

    liberals supported the right

    of the New York Timesto

    run an ad critical of President

    Nixon in 1972, many today

    support restrictions on

    campaign spending by

    conservative interest

    groups. Similarly, he said,

    conservatives have recently

    fought campaign finance

    restrictions but often sup-

    port bans on speech they

    consider indecent.

    TheUnitedStates

    15C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    18/51

    he said, is hindered by a system ofcampaign finance law so complexthat grassroots campaigns and civicgroups cannot know whether or notthey are violating the law.

    Confusing restrictions on cam-paign finances also make the task ofrooting out true corruption more dif-ficult because the law casts a wide net.In an April debate in USA Today,Samples argued that most membersof Congress are not corrupt and thatthe media does a thorough job ofsniffing out even a hint of unethical

    behavior. As Catos government re-form scholars have consistentlyargued, transparency and opennessabout the sources of a legislatorsfunding are a better way to preventundue influence than unenforceablerestrictions on campaigns.

    Unfortunately, political campaignshave become less competitive overtime. Over the last 50 years, the con-

    gressional reelection rate has averagedmore than 90 percent. UncompetitiveElections and the American PoliticalSystem, a study by Cato senior fellowPatrick Basham and IndependenceInstitute senior fellow Dennis Polhill,found that the perks awarded toincumbent politicianspostal frank-ing, free travel, media access, and pub-licly funded stafftranslate to an 11-

    point advantage at the polls. Attemptsto increase competition by limitingcampaign financing actually exacer-bate the problem by limiting theability of challengers and advocacygroups to compete with such well-sit-uated incumbents.

    Incumbents also benefit fromthe ability to gerrymander districts toensure their own reelection. In the

    2006 midterm elections, only a smallpercentage of races will actually becompetitive; the rest are a virtual lockfor the incumbent party. Bashamand Polhills study predicted thatnonpartisan redistricting would benecessary to prevent collusion thatlimits voter choice. Imposing termlimits on long-serving representativeswould also foster turnover in the peo-ples branch of government.

    Government only works as longas an engaged populace has the abili-ty to elect representatives who truly

    speak for their interests and to oustthose who do not. Cato has long beenone of the few consistent voices forthe freedom of expression and gov-ernment accountability that keeppoliticians honest and safeguard therights of citizens to elect the govern-ment they deserve.

    Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) brandishes

    his Cato pocket Constitution on NBC's

    Meet the Press. Cato has distributed more

    than 3 million copies of its pocket edition

    of the Declaration of Independence and

    the Constitution, which is also available

    in Spanish and Arabic.

    R E F O R M I N G T H E P O L I T I C A L P R O C E S S

    16 C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

    I think theAmerican people

    are hungry formore facts, morereal informationabout the situationwe are in. I wouldlike to encouragethem to look onthe website of an

    institution calledthe Cato Institute.

    CONGRESSMANJIM COOPER(D-TN),MAY 25, 2005, SPEECHTO THE U.S. HOUSE OFREPRESENTATIVES

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    19/51

    R E F O R M I N G T H E P O L I T I C A L P R O C E S S

    17C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    I want to thankall of you from

    Cato for not onlyhelping us addressthis fiscal crisisthat we are facingas a nation, butfor your many-yeareffort at trying topreserve the fiscal

    sanity and stabilityof this nation forgenerations thatfollow us.

    SEN. JOHN MCCAIN(R-AZ), OCTOBER17, 2005,CATO HILL BRIEFING

    Catos vice president for government

    affairs Susan Chamberlin and director

    of health and welfare studies Michael

    Tannerdiscuss Social Security reform

    with Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) at an April Hill

    Briefing. At a Policy Forum reflecting on

    his tenure as chairman of the Federal

    Election Commission, Bradley A. Smith

    chats with Cato president Ed Crane.

    Cato director of tax policy studies Chris

    Edwardsjoins Rep. Jeb Hensarling and

    Sens. John McCain and Jim DeMint at a

    press conference on curbing out-of-control

    federal spending.

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    20/51

    If we can preventthe governmentfrom wasting thelabors of the people

    under the pretenseof taking care ofthem, they mustbecome happy.

    THOMASJEFFERSON

    ROLLING BACK

    THE ENTITLEMENT

    STATE

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    21/51

    The rightof the people to be free from governmentmeddling has been ignored for too long.Writing about the New Deal social programshe proposed in 1935, Franklin D. Rooseveltexpressed hope that Congress would notpermit doubts as to constitutionality, howev-er reasonable, to block the suggested legisla-tion. The programs Roosevelt championedare just as unconstitutional today as theywere then, and they have expanded into manymore areas of American life that were meantto remain outside the grasp of the federalgovernment. Today, entitlement programsbenefit not only the poor but a wide rangeof special interest groups, including corpora-tions, human service organizations, inde-pendent charities, and broad groups of citi-

    zens, regardless of financial need.Decades of research show that entitle-

    ment programs hurt all taxpayers in a num-ber of ways. By heavily taxing those who cre-ate new wealth and jobs, the government dis-torts the function of the free market andreduces employment opportunities for thepoor. Government redistribution of wealthcreates perverse incentives for investors try-ing to protect their assets and creates a

    culture of dependency and entitlement-seek-ing that marginalizes the values of hardwork, individual responsibility, and ethical

    values. Public schools, which were intendedto give all children the skills they need to suc-ceed as adults, are instead wasting taxpayermoney and preventing families from seekingout a better education for their children.Fortunately, Cato continues to proposeattainable and innovative reforms to Ameri-

    cas bloated social programs.

    Cato led the way to help restore freedomof choice to consumers and health careproviders with the publication of Patient

    Power in 1992, which called for widespreadavailability of health savings accounts(HSAs) to allow patients to pay for medicalcare with untaxed dollars. This year directorof health policy studies Michael Cannonand director of health and welfare studiesMichael Tanner publishedHealthy Competition:Whats Holding Back Health Care and How to

    Free It, a comprehensive guide to increasingconsumer choice and reducing harmful gov-ernment intervention in the provisionof medical care. Nobel Laureate MiltonFriedman called the book surprisinglyreadable, extraordinarily comprehensive,

    highly persuasive.Cannon and Tanner recommend expand-

    ing consumers ability to choose privatehealth insurance to fit their needs. In March,Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ) spoke at a CatoPolicy Forum about his proposal to create anationwide market for health insuranceinstead of limiting consumers to plans basedin their home state. Michael OGrady of theDepartment of Health and Human Services

    predicted that the proposal would lowerinsurance premiums and allow patients tochoose coverage appropriate to their needs.

    At a Cato Policy Forum in May, CanHealth Savings Accounts Cover the Unin-sured? panelists suggested that combininghigh-deductible health plans with tax-freeHSAs for out-of-pocket expenses could helpmake coverage more affordable for thosewho are now uninsured. Tanner and Cannon

    proposed universal availability of HSAs and

    In Healthy Competition,

    policy scholars Michael

    Tannerand Michael

    Cannon offer practical

    advice on using free

    market principles to

    improve health care for

    Americans. The book

    provides concrete policy

    suggestions for giving

    more Americans access

    to the best health care

    America has to offer

    and allowing competitive

    markets to make medical

    care even better.

    19C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    22/51

    profound deregulation of the healthcare market in Healthy Competition asthe best ethical and practical solution:such policies would lower coststhrough full market competition andrestore individual choice, a right eachindividual should have in a free coun-try. A November article in theNational

    Journal detailed the benefits of HSAsand cited Cannons efforts to expandconsumer-driven health care.

    In 2003, President Bush signedinto law the Medicare prescriptiondrug benefitthe single largest ex-

    pansion of the entitlement state sincethe Johnson administration. Nearly16 percent of federal tax revenues in2005 went to support the currentMedicare system, and the new benefitcould add more than $700 billion tothe cost over the next 10 years. InMedicare Prescription Drugs: MedicalNecessity Meets Fiscal Insanity, aFebruary Cato Briefing Paper, Cato

    senior fellow Jagadeesh Gokhale rec-ommends significant market-basedreforms to bring Medicare costsunder control.

    Catos work to curb entitlementspending is centered on a belief thatthe federal government should be oneof enumerated and limited powers,as mandated in the Constitution.Thanks to the tireless efforts of Cato

    scholars, even politicians are begin-ning to realize that the economy willsomeday fall apart under the pressureof ever-more-confiscatory taxationand senseless regulation.

    At a bipartisan Hill Briefing inOctober, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)agreed that the Medicare drug benefitwill raise taxes to unprecedentedlevels. He joined Catos experts in

    recommending the repeal of the drugbenefit, along with curbing otherwasteful spending, as a means to bal-ance the budget. Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN) predicted that 2535 percent ofseniors would be worse off under thedrug benefit than under their previ-ous private coverage. The drug benefithas already cost many seniors theirexisting drug coverage.

    In a November article in theDetroitFree Press, Michael Cannon asked whyCongress insisted on putting all sen-iors under a single system, when 75

    percent of them already had drug cov-erage. Cannon appeared on NPR, FoxNews, and MSNBC to discuss the drugbenefits disadvantages for seniors.

    Cato experts also devoted signifi-cant attention in 2005 to endingthe governments monopoly on edu-cation. Catos Center for EducationalFreedom presented powerful evi-dence of the superiority of free educa-

    tional markets over governmentschool monopolies and explained theshortcomings of a number of govern-ment education programs.

    Unfortunately, but not unexpect-edly, many government efforts tomake education better and moreaffordable end up backfiring. As col-lege students across the country paidtheir tuition bills in January, Hillsdale

    College professor Gary Wolframpublished Making College MoreExpensive: The Unintended Con-sequences of Federal Tuition Aid, astudy examining how federal tuitionassistance raises the cost of collegetuition by increasing demand, put-ting higher education further out ofreach for the poorest students it wasintended to help.

    At a May Hill Briefing, Cato scholars

    Michael Tannerand Jagadeesh

    Gokhale examined the impact of

    the Social Security deficit on the

    nations finances.

    R O L L I N G B A C K T H E E N T I T L E M E N T S T A T E

    20 C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

    Catos nationwide campaign for

    Social Security reform told millions of

    Americans that they deserve ownership,

    inheritability, and choice regarding their

    own retirement savings.

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    23/51

    R O L L I N G B A C K T H E E N T I T L E M E N T S T A T E

    In April, policy analyst MarieGryphon shattered The Affirmative

    Action Myth, finding that affirma-tive action produces no concrete ben-efits for minority students because somany come from underperformingpublic high schools that do not pre-pare them for college.

    The best way to ensure that under-privileged students succeed in collegeis to improve the quality of their ele-mentary and secondary education. Ata September forum for his new book

    Education Myths: What Special-Interest

    Groups Want You to Believe aboutOur SchoolsAnd Why It Isn't So,

    Manhattan Institute senior fellow JayP. Greene found that nearly all of thestudents whose high school educa-tion prepares them for college go onto enroll in higher education. He alsotackled the fallacy that school choiceharms public schools by drainingresources and talented students. His

    book shows that in school districtswhere vouchers are available, the stu-dents who remain in public schoolsdo better than students in districtswhere no choice exists.

    In October, then-director of CatosCenter for Educational FreedomDavid Salisbury showed how school

    vouchers can increase resourcesavailable to public school students

    in Saving Money and ImprovingEducation: How School Choice CanHelp States Reduce Education Costs.The paper found that the availabilityof vouchers in Arizona, Wisconsin,Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Maine,and Vermont has saved taxpayers mil-lions of dollars and improved thequality of public school education.

    A May book edited by Salisbury

    and University of Newcastle professorJames Tooley, What America Can Learn from School Choice in Other Countries,

    examines longstanding school choiceprograms in Sweden, Chile, Australia,Denmark, and other foreign countriesand concludes that the most salientobjections to voucher programs havebeen overcome in those countries.There is no reason to believe thatschool choice in the United Stateswould not be equally successful.

    Following Salisburys departure,one of the contributors to that book,

    Andrew J. Coulson, was appointedthe new director of the Center forEducational Freedom. Coulson isthe author of Market Education: TheUnknown History.

    Reform of the scandalous SocialSecurity system joined health carechoice and educational freedom as amajor policy initiative of the CatoInstitute in 2005. Major media often

    cite Cato as the first to call for reformof the Social Security system.

    This year, Catos Project on SocialSecurity Choice focused on remind-ing current workers that they are pay-ing their own money into a retire-ment system that will be unable tosupport them by the time they retire.Cato distributed more than 300,000copies of Its Your Money: A Citizens

    Guide to Social Security Reform. Thebooklet explains that in only 12 years,Social Security will begin runninga deficit and that current workerswill likely not recoup the money theyhave paid into the system. This SocialSecurity crisis, however, presents anopportunity to allow younger work-ers a retirement benefit that they cancount on because they own it.

    With the generous support ofdonors across the country, the Pro-

    ject on Social Security Choice creat-ed radio and television ads centeredon the theme of ownership, inheri-tability, and choice that ran on theCBS Radio Network, the RushLimbaugh and Sean Hannity shows,and more than 1,800 local radio andtelevision stations from Seattle toDes Moines to Little Rock. Morethan 56 million Americans heard atleast one ad reminding them thattheir retirement savings should be

    their own and that they shouldchoose how to invest. Print ads werefeatured in the New York Times, theWashington Post, the Wall Street Journal,andRoll Call.

    Congressional Quarterly namedMichael Tanner one of the five mostinfluential Social Security experts thisyear. Tanner gave more than 70speeches and testified before Con-

    gress four times in 2005. Cato schol-ars wrote for USA Today, the Wall Street

    Journal, and other papers and ap-peared on NPRs Morning Edition, the

    Newshour with Jim Lehrer,ABCs WorldNews Tonight, andNBC Nightly Newstodiscuss Social Security reform.

    As public policy reforms centeredon individual autonomy and choicegain wider footholds, the culture of

    dependency underpinning the entitle-ment state will begin to fade. Ul-timately, benefiting from more free-dom and the greater prosperity andhope it brings, millions of individualswill begin to demand further policyreforms that fully reinstate the valuesof Americas founding generation.

    21C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    24/51

    The means ofdefense againstforeign dangerhistorically

    have become theinstruments oftyranny at home.

    JAMES MADISON

    DEFENDING

    AMERICA, PROMOTING

    WORLD PEACE

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    25/51

    The militaryof the United States is the strongest in theworld and has many times throughout his-tory defended the freedom of the UnitedStates and that of foreign nations from thethreat of tyranny. Catos foreign policyscholars have long advocated a balancebetween maintaining a strong nationaldefense and avoiding dangerous entangle-ments in international conflicts where thesecurity of the United States is not at risk.

    In his 2004 book,Exiting Iraq, Catos direc-tor of foreign policy studies ChristopherPreble warned that the conflict had becomefar too costly politically, financially, and interms of life lost. The book recommendeda military withdrawal by January 1, 2005.Unfortunately, the war has continued, the

    costs have continued to rise, and the Bushadministration has declared that the UnitedStates will not set a deadline for withdrawaluntil the new Iraqi government is firmlyestablished.

    Cato senior fellow Tom Palmer traveledto Iraq twice in 2005 to offer assistance toIraqis working to advance toleration, therule of law, free markets, and political plural-ism in the nascent democracy. Among his

    responsibilities, Palmer heads Catos JackByrne Project on Middle East Liberty, anambitious effort to make available libertari-an ideas and policy recommendations in

    Arabic, Kurdish, Farsi, and other MiddleEastern languages. In the summer issue ofCatos Letter, Palmer wrote of his hope thatIraq will become a stable market democracy.

    American interests in maintaining peacein the Arab world and protecting interna-

    tional oil supplies have long been billed as

    justifications for continued intervention inthe region. However, in Sandstorm: Policy

    Failure in the Middle East, Cato research fellowLeon Hadar argued that American interven-tion in the Arab-Israeli conflict has exacer-bated the problem and that plans for peacemust originate among the players in theconflict. Furthermore, he showed that themultibillion-dollar cost of maintaining aU.S. presence negates any benefit of cheaperoil from the region.

    Chris Preble has also been active in thedebate over Americas role in the UnitedNations. In September, he addressed acrowd of Hill staffers on United NationsReform: Beyond the Blame Game, chal-lenging the idea that the UN can improve its

    image without addressing fundamentalcontradictions in its mission. Internationallaw, he said, must sometimes choosebetween respecting the sovereignty ofnations and protecting the rights of peopleliving under repressive regimes, and thosechoices cannot be made without cost.

    The international community has longfeared the proliferation of nuclear weaponsto aggressive, undemocratic regimes. In

    January, Cato held a forum for The KoreanConundrum, a book by vice president fordefense and foreign policy studies Ted GalenCarpenter and former senior fellow DougBandow. Carpenter advocated a policy ofnonaggression in Korea in exchange for ver-ifiable guarantees from North Korea that itwould not pursue its nuclear program. The

    view that North Koreas nuclear ambitionscould be stopped with proper incentives

    from the United States was vindicated in

    Leon Hadars Sandstorm

    challenges traditional

    assumptions about U.S.-

    Middle East relations,

    showing how American

    attempts to foster stability

    and freedom have back-

    fired. U.S. intervention has

    bred resentment, he says,

    which hinders progress and

    peace in the region and

    hurts Americas economic

    and political interests.

    23C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    26/51

    November, when Ambassador JosephDe Trani, U.S. special envoy for theSix-Party Talks, expressed hope thatNorth Korea will agree to abandonits nuclear programs in exchangefor energy and economic assistance.Carpenter appeared on South Koreantelevision, as well as CNN and ReutersTV, to discuss the book and the futureof U.S.-Korea relations.

    Cato scholars have actively sup-ported U.S. efforts to build militarystrength to defend America from for-eign and terrorist threats. In April,

    former director of defense policystudies Charles Pea concluded thatanti-American terrorist groups havelikely acquired shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles. In Flying the Un-friendly Skies: Defending against theThreat of Shoulder-Fired Mis-siles,he advised that commercial aircraftcould be outfitted with technology toprotect against the potential deadly

    threat. Pea, a noted terrorism expert,was a frequent guest on radio and tel-evision, appearing on C-SPAN, NBCNewschannel, and MSNBC to discussthe War on Terror.

    As the year was coming to a close,an article in the New York Times re-

    vealed that the Bush administrationhad authorized the National Security

    Agency to conduct warrantless wire-

    taps against Americans it suspectsmay be involved in terrorism. TimLynch, director of Catos Project onCriminal Justice, appeared on NBC

    Nightly Newsto debate Judge RichardPosner, who argued that warrantlesswiretaps were legal.

    Many nativists have taken theview that the best way to prevent for-eign terrorism in the United States is

    to keep foreigners out. But despiteincreasingly harsh crackdowns onillegal immigration, more than 10million undocumented immigrantscurrently live in the United States. Inhis June study, Backfire at theBorder: Why Enforcement withoutLegalization Cannot Stop IllegalImmigration, Princeton Universityprofessor Douglas S. Massey showedhow current U.S. policies waste lawenforcement resources and fail to dif-ferentiate between peaceful immi-grants and dangerous criminals.

    At a September Hill Briefing,Daniel Griswold, director of CatosCenter for Trade Policy Studies,described the U.S. immigration sys-tem as Bordering on Failure. Heemphasized that as long as there is ademand for labor in the UnitedStates, job-seeking migrants willenter the country, legally or illegally.Griswold testified in May before the

    Immigration Subcommittee of theSenate Committee on the Judiciary,and his proposal to create a guestworker program has been incorporat-ed into an immigration bill PresidentBush requested from Congress in his2006 State of the Union address.

    Americas War on Drugs has hada deadly impact on the Latin

    American countries that produce

    them. In his 2003 bookBad NeighborPolicy,Carpenter predicted that crack-downs on drug-exporting nationswould lead to escalating violence,economic instability, and the milita-rization of civilian life in those coun-tries. Colombia has already sufferedthe consequences of its cooperationwith draconian U.S. drug policies,and unfortunately, according to a

    D E F E N D I N G A M E R I C A , P R O M O T I N G W O R L D P E A C E

    24 C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

    The harsh realityis that terrorist

    groups aroundthe world havebeen enrichedby prohibitionistdrug policies thatdrive up drugcosts and deliverenormous profits

    to the outlaworganizationswilling to acceptthe risks that gowith the trade.Drug prohibitionis terrorisms

    best friend.That symbioticrelationship willcontinue untilthe United Statesand its allies havethe wisdom todramaticallychange theirdrug policies.

    TED GALEN CARPENTER,NATIONALPOST,JANUARY 4, 2005

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    27/51

    November Foreign Policy Analysis,Mexico Is Becoming the NextColombia. If Mexico is to stop thistrend, Carpenter explains, the U.S.government must rethink its abso-lutist position on drug interdictionabroad, allowing the Mexican author-ities to tackle corruption and violencewithout also having to fight our Waron Drugs.

    The War on Terror is not a fightwith a clear end, making a principled,targeted foreign policy more impor-tant than ever before. Keeping

    America safe and strong will requirethe kind of innovative, unconven-tional ideas for which Cato Institutescholars are widely known.

    Ted Galen Carpenterasks how best

    to guarantee that North Korea abides

    by its promises to dismantle nuclear

    weapons programs. Christopher

    Preble discusses national securityand the war on terrorism at a Cato

    policy forum. On a visit to Iraq in

    April, senior fellowTom G. Palmer

    talks withAmal Kashif al-Ghitta,

    member of the Iraqi Parliament.

    Palmer addressed Parliament on

    Principles of Constitutional Demo-

    cracy. Palmer also met with the

    Minister of Education,Abdul-Aziz

    Tayib, at the Ministry of Education

    in Erbil.

    D E F E N D I N G A M E R I C A , P R O M O T I N G W O R L D P E A C E

    25C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    Now is the timeto chart a new

    course. The firststep should be afirm pledge to beginthe withdrawal ofAmerican troopssoon after theDecember 2005elections. The Bush

    administrationshould furthercommit to have allU.S. troops out ofIraq by the end of2007 at the latest.

    CHRISTOPHERPREBLE,

    CHICAGO SUN-TIMES,NOVEMBER15, 2005

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    28/51

    Harmony, liberalintercourse withall nations, arerecommended by

    policy, humanity,and interest. Buteven our commercialpolicy shouldhold an equal andimpartial hand;neither seeking nor

    granting exclusivefavors or preferences;consulting thenatural course ofthings; diffusingand diversifying bygentle means the

    streams of com-merce, but forcingnothing.

    GEORGE WASHINGTONSFAREWELL ADDRESS

    FREEING

    THE WORLD

    ECONOMY

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    29/51

    and strong property rights are paramount

    in creating a healthy and dynamic economy.

    The United States has a long history of such

    economic freedoms. If developing countries

    are to benefit from U.S. prosperity and free-

    dom, they must also adopt free trade as a

    first principleand the United States mustnot revert to what Alan Greenspan calls

    creeping protectionism. Trade policy

    experts at the Cato Institute believe that

    almost every sector of the American econo-

    my could benefit from competition and

    trade with the rest of the world.

    Unfortunately, interest groups working

    on behalf of industries that benefit from

    domestic protectionism have worked hard

    to convince the public that free trade threat-ens American jobs and the American econo-

    my. Certain sectors of the farm industry

    have perhaps been most guilty of propagat-

    ing such myths. Americans have been told

    that the American family farm is dying, and

    that farm price supports are necessary to

    preserve the quintessential agrarian lifestyle.

    Daniel Griswold, director of Catos Center

    for Trade Policy Studies; Stephen Slivinski,

    director of budget studies; and ChristopherPreble, director of foreign policy studies,

    exposed the truth about farm subsidies in

    their paper Ripe for Reform: Six Good

    Reasons to Reduce U.S. Farm Subsidies and

    Trade Barriers. In fact, they argue, most

    farm subsidies go to wealthy corporations

    and hurt small farms. Farm price supports

    and tariffs make food more expensive for

    Americans by preventing cheaper foreign

    goods from entering the market, and they

    prevent labor and resources from being used

    more efficiently in other industries.

    Agricultural protectionism isnt just

    harmful to producers and consumers; its

    also illegal. The World Trade Organization

    in 2005 ruled in several cases that the United

    States was violating its international tradeagreements by maintaining farm subsidies

    and trade barriers against its trading part-

    ners. In a December Trade Policy Analysis,

    Boxed In: Conflicts between U.S. Farm

    Policies and WTO Obligations, University

    of California professor Daniel Sumner

    found that U.S. farm programs for a variety

    of commodities may be suppressing market

    prices in violation of the WTO commit-

    ments. Dan Griswold appeared on CNN,BBCs World Update, and CNBC to discuss

    the WTOs decision and its implications for

    other longstanding U.S. trade restrictions.

    The foreign aid community has for

    decades tried one approach after another

    in an effort to promote growth in poor

    nations. But aid has not reduced poverty,

    nor is it likely to do so in the future, accord-

    ing to 40-year veteran development practi-

    tioner Thomas Dichter in a SeptemberForeign Policy Briefing. Dichter believes that

    development assistance to poorly governed

    developing countries should be ended.

    Moeletsi Mbeki of South Africa agrees that a

    lack of money is not the cause of African

    poverty. In Underdevelopment in Sub-

    Saharan Africa: The Role of the Private

    Sector and Political Elites, he observes that

    Africas predatory political elite prevent the

    African private sector from creating wealth.

    27

    Fredrik Segerfeldt

    explores how millions

    of poor households in

    the developing world

    have gained access to

    clean, safe water through

    privatization of water

    networks in his 2005

    book, Water for Sale.Private companies can

    raise the capital neces-

    sary to quickly improve

    water infrastructure,

    and competition can

    ensure that water

    services are provided

    efficiently and affordably.

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    Freetrade

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    30/51

    Peasants, who make up the core of

    the private sector, would benefit

    from property rights protection and

    market reforms.

    Marian Tupy, assistant director of

    the Cato Institutes Project on

    Global Economic Liberty, appeared

    on CNN International, the PBS

    NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and NPRs

    Marketplace to discuss the pitfalls of

    aid to Africa. Tupys December

    study, Trade Liberalization and

    Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan

    Africa, presented research showingthat countries with the greatest free-

    dom to trade tend to grow faster

    than countries that restrict trade.

    Developing countries, he said, can

    reap the benefits of free trade even if

    the developed world retains trade

    barriers and should immediately free

    trade relations with their neighbors

    and the world.

    Catos advocacy of free trade paidoff this year in Latin America when

    the U.S. House of Representatives

    approved the Central American Free

    Trade Agreement in July. At a Hill

    Briefing in March, Griswold and

    Cato trade policy analyst Dan

    Ikenson argued that both imports

    and exports benefit American con-

    sumers by giving buyers access to

    new foreign goods and creating newmarkets for American-made goods

    abroad. In their 2004 study, The

    Case for CAFTA, Griswold and

    Ikenson maintained that despite its

    flaws, the agreement enhances im-

    portant U.S. foreign policy goals by

    promoting freedom and democracy

    in a region that has been troubled in

    the recent past by wars and political

    oppression. Ian Vsquez, director

    of Catos Project on Global Eco-

    nomic Liberty was a frequent guest

    on Spanish language radio and tele-

    vision to discuss the benefits of

    the agreement.

    Latin Americas troubled eco-

    nomic and political history was the

    subject of two policy forums at Cato

    in 2005. At a March forum for his

    book,Liberty for Latin America: How to

    Undo Five Hundred Years of State

    Oppression, Peruvian journalist Alvaro

    Vargas Llosa explained that stateoppression has been a problem in

    the region since the Spanish con-

    quest of the New World, and it con-

    tinues to preempt good policies and

    undermine the efforts of Latin

    Americans to lift themselves out of

    poverty. Vargas Llosa returned in

    November to comment on The Roots

    of Poverty in Latin America, a new book

    by Argentine author Guillermo Yeatts. The author posited that

    poverty persists in Latin America

    because countries colonized by

    Spain maintain social and economic

    institutions that undermine proper-

    ty rights and voluntary exchange.

    The release of the 2005 edition of

    Economic Freedom of the World, copub-

    lished with the Fraser Institute in

    Canada and more than 60 otherthink tanks around the world,

    brought significant international

    media attention. Ian Vsquez ap-

    peared on CNN to discuss the books

    finding that economic freedom is

    the key to prosperity. Newspapers in

    Thailand, Georgia, Hong Kong, the

    United Arab Emirates, Ukraine, and

    other nations around the world

    Christopher Dell, U.S. ambassador

    to Zimbabwe, speaks about the

    threats leveled against him after

    he criticized the Mugabe regimesseizure of private farmland.Amela

    Karabegovic of the Fraser Institute

    heralds the release ofEconomic

    Freedom of the World: 2005 Report.

    South African businessman Moeletsi

    Mbeki explains that corruption

    and unstable property rights make

    building wealth nearly impossible

    for many Africans.

    F R E E I N G T H E W O R L D E C O N O M Y

    28 C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    31/51

    reported their countries successes in

    economic freedom and endorsed the

    reports conclusion that economic

    freedom promotes peace and prosper-

    ity. The International Monetary Fund

    relied extensively on the report in its

    annual World Economic Outlook to sup-

    port its findings that institutions such

    as property rights and rule of law are

    the keys to economic growth.

    Nations achieve economic growth

    and stability by promoting stable

    monetary institutions and encourag-

    ing investment in the economy. At the23rd Annual Cato Institute Monetary

    Conference, Monetary Institutions

    and Economic Development, co-

    sponsored with The Economist, leading

    monetary economists explained why

    institutions matter and suggested

    ways that emerging market economies

    can improve their monetary institu-

    tions to encourage trade. Speakers

    included Rodrigo de Rato, managingdirector of the International Mone-

    tary Fund; Roger W. Ferguson Jr., vice

    chairman of the Federal Reserve

    Board; University of CaliforniaLos

    Angeles professor Deepak Lal; Mas-

    sachusetts Institute of Technology

    professor Yasheng Huang; and Cato

    chairman William A. Niskanen.

    China has, in recent years, begun

    to embrace the principles of freetrade. Monetary conference partici-

    pants argued that allowing private

    investment and increasing the flexi-

    bility of the exchange rate would

    increase confidence in the Chinese

    economy and aid growth. Catos vice

    president for academic affairs James

    A. Dorn has argued for ending finan-

    cial repression in China. He has

    warned that China-bashing could

    lead to trade wars that would under-

    mine Chinas peaceful rise.

    In U.S.-China Relations in the

    Wake of CNOOC, Dorn argued

    that preventing the CNOOC energy

    companys bid to buy U.S.-based

    Unocal was pure protectionism and

    not in the interest of U.S. national

    security. Politicizing energy markets

    and restricting the free flow of capi-

    tal will harm both Chinas political

    development and the American econ-

    omy. Cato senior fellow Jerry Taylortestified in July before the House

    Armed Services Committee, defend-

    ing the right of Unocal stockholders

    to sell their firm to the highest bidder.

    As China moves toward econom-

    ic freedom, the Zimbabwean econo-

    my has collapsed as a result of

    the governments widespread viola-

    tions of private property rights.

    Christopher Dell, the U.S. ambassa-dor to Zimbabwe, was threatened

    with expulsion from the country

    after giving a speech at the Africa

    University in Mutare in November

    condemning the human rights abus-

    es and economic mismanagement of

    the Mugabe regime. In that speech

    he cited a Cato Institute paper, How

    the Loss of Property Rights Caused

    Zimbabwes Collapse, which blamesthe confiscation of private farmland

    for Zimbabwes current economic

    and agricultural crisis.

    Poor countries that replace gov-

    ernment monopolies with market

    competition have seen tangible

    results. The failure of public utility

    companies to provide clean, safe

    water to more than 1 billion people

    F R E E I N G T H E W O R L D E C O N O M Y

    29C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    Just as Hayekwarned, the

    government'sinitial attack onprivate propertyled to interventionin the economyand, concomitantly,the destruction ofpolitical freedom

    in Zimbabwe.If Mr. Mugabecontinues alongthe path markedby other socialistdictators, theworld may yet

    see Zimbabwedescend into anorgy of violence.

    MARIAN TUPY,THEFINANCIAL TIMES,JULY 27, 2005

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    32/51

    worldwide has created a water crisis,

    and 22 people die each minute as a

    result. In his June book, Water for Sale,

    Fredrik Segerfeldt of the Confedera-

    tion of Swedish Enterprise detailed

    how weak property rights, bureau-

    cratic management, and price distor-

    tions have led to inadequate water

    supplies throughout Asia, Africa,

    and Latin America. Using numerous

    examples of successful private water

    networks, Segerfeldt showed how

    privatizing water distribution can

    increase access to affordable pipedwater, especially for the worlds poor-

    est people, who otherwise pay high

    black market prices for water.

    Governments in poor countries

    have also failed to educate children.

    A Cato Institute Conference in

    September asked, Does Private

    Education Work for the Poor? and

    found that in many of the worlds

    poorest countries, low-cost, high-quality private schools are educating

    thousands of students whose achieve-

    ments go unnoticed by the develop-

    ment community. Private school

    proprietors from Zimbabwe, India,

    Nigeria, and other countries where

    public education has failed the poor-

    est students described harassment

    and demands for bribes from gov-

    ernment officials who feel threat-ened by the success of private educa-

    tion for the poor. A study by James

    Tooley and Pauline Dixon of the

    University of Newcastle, copublished

    in December by Catos Project on

    Global Economic Liberty and its

    Center for Educational Freedom,

    documented for the first time the

    extent and quality of private educa-

    tion for the poor in some of the

    poorest slums in the world.

    European critics of the United

    States often claim that social demo-

    cratic systems are better for citizens

    than free-market economics. In

    September, Cato released the paper-

    back edition of Olaf Gersemanns

    Cowboy Capitalism, the popular book

    that shows how greater market free-

    doms in the United States create a

    more flexible, adaptable, and pros-

    perous system than the declining

    welfare states of Europe.As Americans complained about

    high gas prices in the wake of the

    summers hurricanes, Cato senior

    fellows Jerry Taylor and Peter Van

    Doren appeared on every major news

    network to warn against govern-

    ment intervention in the oil market.

    They also urged opposition to the

    pork-laden energy bill, which politi-

    cians claimed would help lower ener-gy prices through massive subsidies

    to big producers.

    Regulation of U.S. goods can have

    a direct impact on the global market.

    Taylor and Van Doren have long been

    skeptical of efforts by the U.S. govern-

    ment to control the international

    oil market by regulating American

    suppliers and storing vast reserves of

    domestic oil. In a January Policy Analysis, Economic Amnesia: The

    Case against Oil Price Controls and

    Windfall Profit Taxes, they show that

    price controls and taxes on oil profits

    dissuades investment in American oil,

    leaving the nation more dependent

    on foreign suppliers.

    In todays competitive global

    economy, policymakers need to re-

    F R E E I N G T H E W O R L D E C O N O M Y

    30 C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

    Chinas emergencefrom centuries

    of isolation andstagnation is oneof the great storiesof our time. Hun-dreds of millionsof its citizens arebeginning to tastethe rewards of

    middle-class lifethat most Americanstake for granted.It is profoundlyin our economicand securityinterests to nurture

    that progress.DANIEL T. GRISWOLD,

    FORBES, NOVEMBER14, 2005

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    33/51

    spond to foreign reforms by cutting

    U.S. income tax rates. Catos director

    of tax policy Chris Edwards testified

    in May before the Presidents Adviso-

    ry Panel on Federal Tax Reform.

    When the panel released its recom-

    mendations to simplify the tax code

    and reduce taxes on savings and

    investments, Edwards wrote in the

    Washington Times in October, policy-

    makers should be more aggressive in

    responding to global trends and cut-

    ting marginal tax rates further than

    the tax panel has proposed. He wasalso cited in theFinancial Times, New

    York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek,

    Investors Business Daily, andForbes on

    tax and budget issues.

    Countries around the world that

    have opened trade and lowered

    restrictions on their economies have

    reaped extensive rewards. As proper-

    ty rights and economic institutions

    in developing countries are strength-ened, those countries will generate

    wealth and move out of poverty. And

    prosperous countries that improve

    economic freedom will see still

    greater growth and innovation. As

    the work of Cato experts consistent-

    ly shows, expanding free trade, open-

    ing markets, and removing regulato-

    ry restraints will lead to economic

    progress that benefits people, richand poor alike.

    At a September Hill Briefing, Dan

    Griswold outlines necessary reforms

    to the American immigration system.

    James Dorn welcomes nearly 200

    guests to Catos 23rd Annual Monetary

    Conference. Ian Vsquez moderates

    a panel discussion on the role of finan-

    cial market liberalization in economic

    development. Dan Ikenson makes The

    Case for CAFTA at a Cato Hill Briefing.

    F R E E I N G T H E W O R L D E C O N O M Y

    31C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

    When you talkabout debt relief,

    what youre reallytalking aboutis the failure ofpast foreign aidbecause themajority of thedebt of heavilyindebted countries

    is due to officialloans from theWorld Bank,the IMF, andother places.

    IAN VSQUEZ,WASHINGTONTIMES,

    JULY

    8, 2005

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    34/51

    The powers notdelegated to theUnited States bythe Constitution,

    nor prohibited byit to the states, arereserved to thestates respectively,or to the people.

    CONSTITUTION OFTHE UNITED STATESOF AMERICA

    TAKING ON

    BIG-GOVERNMENT

    CONSERVATIVES

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    35/51

    Historically,

    Profligate government

    spending will lead to

    fiscal crisis for future

    generations. Fortunately,

    as Cato director of tax policy

    studies Chris Edwards

    shows in Downsizing the

    Federal Government,

    we dont need many ofthe programs the federal

    government provides.

    The book, which offers a

    concrete plan for cutting

    unconstitutional programs

    and streamlining federal

    agencies, was lauded by

    Nobel laureate James M.

    Buchanan as a responsible

    program-by-program set

    of proposals to get the

    federal government within

    reasonable l imits.

    33

    the political left has pushed for more govern-ment spending and intervention, while theright has held that government programscost too much, provide too little benefit tothe taxpayers who fund them, and trampleon liberty. Liberals have insisted that peoplerequire government assistance and protec-tion; conservatives have argued that toomuch regulation harms the economy by sti-fling innovation and destroying jobs.

    In recent years, however, many Republi-cans have abandoned their conservativeprinciples in favor of unprecedented federalspending, rapidly rising deficits, and increas-ing government intrusion into every area of

    American life. Believing that big governmentof any political stripe is detrimental to liber-

    ty, Cato scholars have been especially criticalrecently of big-government Republicans forhiding their excessive spending behind therhetoric of conservatism.

    The GOP has broken the Contract withAmerica that led it to victory in the 1994elections. In March, Cato released The

    Republican Revolution 10 Years Later: Smaller

    Government or Business as Usual? edited byCatos director of tax policy studies Chris

    Edwards and director of the Center forRepresentative Government John Samples.Former House speaker Newt Gingrichwrites about his view that the 1994 electionwas the culmination of a Republican tradi-tion that began with Barry Goldwater andRonald Reagan. Other contributors, includ-ing former majority leader Dick Armey andCato president Ed Crane, argue thatRepublicans must return to those philo-

    sophical roots if they hope to fulfill the

    promise of the Republican Revolution andgive Americans the smaller, more effectivegovernment they deserve.

    Republicans are clearly not living up totheir rhetoric of fiscal responsibility. As Catodirector of budget studies Stephen Slivinskishowed in his May Policy Analysis, TheGrand Old Spending Party: How Republi-cans Became Big Spenders, the currentRepublican administration has presidedover the largest increase in federal spendingsince Lyndon Johnson. The federal budgetas a share of the economy grew from 18.5percent of GDP on Clintons last day inoffice to 20.3 percent by the end of Bushsfirst term, and Republicans have continuedto add new programs to the budget. The

    study was cited in The Economist, Newsweek,Time, and the Washington Post. Slivinski plansto release a book in 2006 expanding onthe story of how Republicans lost theirfiscal restraint.

    In February, Cato released the 6th editionof the Cato Handbook on Policy, a comprehen-sive, issue-by-issue blueprint for reducingthe federal government to the limits intend-ed by the Founding Fathers. The Washington

    Posthas called theHandbook a soup-to-nutsagenda to reduce spending, kill programs,terminate whole agencies, and dramaticallyrestrict the power of the federal govern-ment. The 2005 Handbook cited cuttingtaxes and reining in spending as top-priorityissues, along with developing new strategiesto fight the War on Terrorism without vio-lating citizens civil liberties.

    The media latched on to stories of profli-

    gate government spending in August, when

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E W W W . C A T O . O R G

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    36/51

    34

    the pork-laden highway bill camebefore Congress. The bill contained6,371 earmarks for special projectsadded to the bill by powerful mem-bers of Congress. Rep. Don Young (R-

    AK), chairman of the TransportationCommittee, secured more than $900million in pork projects for Alaska,including the much-condemnedbridge to nowhere. Cato executive

    vice president David Boaz appearedon CNNs Inside Politics to condemnthe bloated bill.

    In an op-ed in the Washington

    Times, Chris Edwards pointed outthat although Republicans deservedthe blame for producing so muchwaste, the two parties are partners incrime in pork spending, corporatesubsidies, unneeded Pentagon wea-pons systems, misallocated Home-land Security funding, and otherwaste. At a Cato Hill Briefing inOctober, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)

    reminded the audience that RonaldReagan had vetoed a highway bill forproposing 100 pork projects. That billwould be thrifty by todays standards.

    After hurricanes devastated theGulf Coast last fall, many Americanswere quick to blame the federal gov-ernment for spending too littlemoney on preparation and failing torespond quickly enough in the after-

    math. Cato scholars offered a differ-ent perspective: federal meddlingitself had led to bad local policies thatexacerbated the disaster, and privateindustry was better than governmentat responding to the needs of the

    victims. Cato scholars testified beforeCongress; were featured in the WallStreet Journal, National Review, Forbes,

    and the Washington Times; and appeared

    on CNN, FoxNews, and NPR. Catochairman William Niskanen told theWall Street Journalthat Katrina could bea test of the conservative agenda, fromenterprise zones to school vouchersand the repeal of labor laws, andthese ideas deserve careful thought.

    Cato senior editor Gene Healyopposed an expanded role for themilitary in disaster relief. On the

    NewsHour with Jim Lehrerand ABCsWorld News Tonight, Healy explainedthat the Posse Comitatus Act ismeant to prevent the president from

    using the military in a policing roleagainst American citizens. Healyurged the government not to use anatural disaster as a pretense fordestroying a fundamental principle of

    American law: that turning the mili-tary on civilians should be a last resort.

    In September, then-House major-ity leader Tom DeLay claimed thatthe government was running at peak

    efficiency and that he could find nofat to cut from the budget. He chal-lenged those who believe in reducingthe size of government to bring methe offsets, Ill be glad to do it. ChrisEdwards answered that call with hisbook,Downsizing the Federal Government,a comprehensive catalog of govern-ment waste, mismanagement, fraud,pork, and programs that overstep the

    federal governments constitutional-ly recognized powers. Edwards foundmore than $300 billion in unneces-sary, inefficient, and unconstitutionalgovernment programs that should beabolished or delegated to local govern-ments and private actors. Sen. TomCoburn (R-OK) found the book socompelling that he had his entire staffread it during Congresss winter recess.

    Chris Edwards proposes to Hill staffers

    that fiscal conservatism would be well

    received by the voters. Jim Harpertells

    the House Committee on Homeland

    Security that air travel would be safer

    if airlines were held responsible for their

    own security. Cato chairmanWilliam

    Niskanen testifies before the House

    Energy and Commerce Committee on

    the folly of price controls.

    T A K I N G O N B I G G O V E R N M E N T C O N S E R V A T I V E S

    C A T O I N S T I T U T E 2 0 0 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T

  • 8/14/2019 Cato Institute: Annual Report 2005

    37/51

    When the federal governmentcommits to spending it can ill afford,it often foists the costs of such pro-grams on the states. As states contin-ued their efforts to claw their way outof the worst budget hole in years,Catos director of budget studiesStephen Slivinski and senior fellowStephen Moore released the seventhbiennial Fiscal Policy Report Cardon Americas Governors. The reportcards grading is based on 15 objec-tive measures of fiscal performance,with high grades going to governors

    who have cut taxes and spendingthe most. The report shows that statescan secure their long-term fiscal healthby restraining spending growth andkeeping taxes low to promote econom-ic development. Slivinski commentedon high-scoring governors ArnoldSchwarzenegger (R-CA) and MarkSanford (R-SC) and failing gover-nors Bob Taft (R-OH) and Edward

    Rendell (D-P


Recommended