+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS:...

CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS:...

Date post: 02-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
40
CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO EARTHQUAKES Prof. Dr. Güney Özcebe TED University Ankara
Transcript
Page 1: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE

DUE TO EARTHQUAKES

Prof. Dr. Güney Özcebe

TED University Ankara

Page 2: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

In-Class Activities

• P/A Quiz • Design philosophy for seismic resistant design

• Needs for strength, ductility and stiffness

• Causes of damage

• Concept quiz

Page 3: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

P/A Quiz

Which one of the followings makes sense? a)  The magnitude of earthquakes can be precisely

predicted

b)   The return period of a certain magnitude earthquake

can be precisely predicted

c)  The locality of the future earthquakes can precisely be

predicted

d)   None of the above

Page 4: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

P/A Quiz

What is earthquake resistant design? a)  No damage in any earthquake

b)   No damage in strong earthquakes

c)  No damage and no collapse in strong earthquakes

d)   Considerable damage, no collapse in strong

earthquakes

Page 5: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

EARTHQUAKES

Copyright, Wikipedia.org

Page 6: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

EARTHQUAKES

Page 7: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

EARTHQUAKES

Page 8: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

EARTHQUAKES

Page 9: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY FOR SEISMIC RESISTANT BUILDINGS •  In case of minor earthquakes:

No damage or distress to occur in load-bearing or non-load-bearing structural elements

•  In case of moderate earthquakes: Only repairable damage may occur in load-bearing or non-load-bearing structural elements.

•  In case of a severe earthquake: The building may become unusable, but collapse has to be prevented.

Page 10: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SEISMIC SAFETY IN REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

• Adequate strength

• Adequate ductility • Adequate stiffness

It is the function of earthquake codes to ensure that the above principles are applied and satisfied.

Page 11: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

F

Δ

Fe Fe

Δ1

STRENGTH and DUCTILITY

Δ1

Δ1

Page 12: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

STRENGTH and DUCTILITY F

Δ

Fe

Load Reduction Factor R = f(FR/Fe)

FR

Δ2

Δ1

Lower strength results in smaller force on structure. The structure can survive the earth excitation if it possesses ductility.

Δ2

FR

Page 13: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

REASONS FOR STIFFNESS REQUIREMENT

•  To reduce second-order moments as much as possible.

As stiffness Δ

P-Δ

F

Δ P

Page 14: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

REASONS FOR STIFFNESS REQUIREMENT

To minimize non-structural damage.

Page 15: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

TYPES OF DAMAGE

•  Damage due to soil conditions •  Damage resulting from errors made

during design and the construction processes.

Page 16: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

DAMAGE DUE TO SOIL CONDITIONS

•  Liquefaction •  Rupture or fissure •  Excessive soil deformation

Page 17: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

DAMAGE FROM ERRORS DURING DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

•  Architectural mistakes and/or mistakes in the selection of structural load-bearing system

•  Design and detailing mistakes resulting from bad engineering practice.

•  Construction mistakes

These mistakes are known to comprise the largest cause of damage and failure when the structure is subjected to earthquake load !!

Page 18: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SYSTEM ERRORS

•  Asymmetry in plan and elevation •  Insufficient lateral stiffness •  Over the structure height

– Sudden changes in strength leading to week storeys

– Sudden changes in stiffness leading to soft storeys

– Sudden change in floor plan area leading to set backs

Page 19: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

Sudden changes in stiffness and strength over the height of a building result in the creation of a soft storey causing increase in interstory drift.

In these systems damage will occur in the weak floor columns, and if these columns do not possess adequate ductility, failure is inevitable

Page 20: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

Abrupt changes in member sections cause stress concentrations as well as loss of stiffness and strength in these regions.

Page 21: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SYSTEM ERRORS

•  Discontinuity in frame elements •  Weak column/strong beam connection •  Formation of short columns •  Making buildings with large wing

portions •  Houses in terraced rows (insufficient

construction joint)

Page 22: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

Leaving a row of windows within infill walls or shear walls results in short columns.

Because short columns are not taken into account in the structural design, the resulting high shear forces cause in shear failures of the columns.

Page 23: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

Structural elements of adjacent buildings may undergo severe damage due to hammering effects

Local as well as total collapse may also result…

Page 24: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

UNSYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS

K.M.

Fy

Fx

Fx

Δ x = Eşit Ötelenme

R.M

Rijitlik merkezine etkiyen yatay kuvvet, yapıda aynı

yönde eşit ötelenme yaratır.

M.C

R.C

Page 25: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

UNSYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS

K.M

R.M

Fx K.M

R.M Fx

Mz

M.C

R.C

M.C

Page 26: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

UNSYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF VERTICAL ELEMENTS

i’th Floor Direction of the inertial force

(Δi)max

(Δi)min

i +1’th Floor

This is known as floor torsion.

Page 27: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

The earthquake causes large horizontal forces acting on buildings in both principal directions. Frames can carry these forces if and only if the building has sufficient ductility.

Page 28: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

•  The buildings that satisfactorily perform during an earthquake dissipate sufficient energy.

•  Energy absorption and dissipation depends on ductility, which itself is highly dependent on confinement.

•  This ability can only be provided by PROPER DETAILING of R/C members. This is the prime responsibility of the engineers.

IMPORTANT REMINDER

Page 29: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

DETAILING ERRORS

•  Detailing errors usually result from a lack of knowledge of structural behaviour

-  Bad & wrong engineering practice

Page 30: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

Negligence of proper detailing of ties and/or confinement reinforcement in plastic hinge regions lead to heavy structural damage in the case of an earthquake!

Page 31: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

CONSTRUCTION ERRORS

•  Poor concrete quality •  Variations in the member dimensions from the

design values •  Reinforcement not placed in accordance with

project requirements •  At site alterations on the design drawings

during construction

Page 32: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SUGGESTIONS: CHOICE OF SYSTEM

•  A regular and symmetric plan should be chosen; •  shear walls should be incorporated into the system

to provide sufficient lateral stiffness; •  Sudden changes of stiffness and strength over the

building height should be prevented; •  Hammering of neighbouring buildings should be

prevented; •  Soft storys, short columns, weak column-strong

beam connections should be avoided.

Page 33: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

When symmetrically placed in plan in both directions and continuous over the building height, shear walls contributed very positively to the seismic behaviour of the buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake.

Page 34: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING

•  The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

•  Pay attention to the amount and design details of the reinforcing bars.

Page 35: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING

•  The ends of columns and beams should be properly confined

•  At all joints (especially in corner columns) ties must definitely be provided.

Page 36: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SUGGESTIONS: CONSTRUCTION Construction requires care, effective supervision and professional application. IT MUST NOT BE FORGOTTEN THAT THE

BUILDING WHICH WILL SUFFER THE

EARTHQUAKE IS NOT THE ONE FOR WHICH

THE CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS HAVE

BEEN DONE ON PAPER BUT THE ONE THAT IS

CONSTRUCTED AT THE SITE.

Page 37: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

SUGGESTIONS: CONSTRUCTION

Construction requires care, effective supervision and professional application. IF REINFORCEMENT IS INADEQUATE AND WRONGLY PLACED AND THE CONCRETE QUALITY IS POOR, EVEN THE BEST DESIGN CANNOT SAVE THE STRUCTURE FROM DAMAGE OR COLLAPSE.

Page 38: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

ALL in ALL

•  Engineers and architects must know the reinforced concrete behavior in full details, understand the importance of EQ design codes and obey the code requirements.

•  Construction must be supervised thoroughly. •  Legislative bodies must take all necessay

actions and enforce all the laws designed for this purpose.

Page 39: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

LESSONS FROM THE PAST EQs

Page 40: CAUSES OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE DUE TO …...buildings shown after the 1999 earthquake. SUGGESTIONS: DETAILING • The dimensions of vertical load carrying members should be satisfactory

Concept Quiz

Earthquake resistant design is: a.  Architects business

b.  Engineers business

c.  Constructors business

d.  A political will

e.  All of the above


Recommended