CI
CHINTR
HAPRODU
PTEUCTI
ER ION
- 1
Chapter 1
1.1
1.1 Introduction to Nanomaterials
Introduction
Nanomaterials are cornerstones of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Nanostructure
science and technology is a broad and interdisciplinary area of research and
development activity that has been growing explosively worldwide in the past few
years. It has the potential for revolutionizing the ways in which materials and products
are created and the range and nature of functionalities that can be accessed. It is
already having a significant commercial impact, which will assuredly increase in the
future [1].
Figure 1.1.1: Evolution of science and technology and the future.
What are nanomaterials?
Nanoscale materials are defined as a set of substances where at least one dimension is
less than approximately 100 nanometers. A nanometer is one millionth of a millimeter
- approximately 100,000 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.
Nanomaterials are of interest because at this scale unique optical, magnetic, electrical,
Chapter 1
1.2
and other properties emerge. These emergent properties have the potential for great
impacts in electronics, medicine, and other fields.
Figure 1.1.2: Nanomaterial (For example: Carbon nanotube).
Some nanomaterials occur naturally, but of particular interest are engineered
nanomaterials (EN), which are designed for, and already being used in many
commercial products and processes. They can be found in such things as sunscreens,
cosmetics, sporting goods, stain-resistant clothing, tires, electronics, as well as many
other everyday items, and are used in medicine for purposes of diagnosis, imaging
and drug delivery.
Engineered nanomaterials are resources designed at the molecular (nanometre)
level to take advantage of their small size and novel properties which are generally
not seen in their conventional, bulk counterparts. The two main reasons why materials
at the nano scale can have different properties are, increased relative surface area and
new quantum effects. Nanomaterials have a much greater surface area to volume ratio
than their conventional forms, which can lead to greater chemical reactivity and affect
their strength. Also at the nano scale, quantum effects can become much more
important in determining the materials properties and characteristics, leading to novel
optical, electrical and magnetic behaviours.
Nanomaterials are already in commercial use, with some having been
available for several years or decades. The range of commercial products available
today is very broad, including stain-resistant and wrinkle-free textiles, cosmetics,
sunscreens, electronics, paints and varnishes. Nanocoatings and nanocomposites are
finding uses in diverse consumer products, such as windows, sports equipment,
bicycles and automobiles. There are novel UV-blocking coatings on glass bottles
Chapter 1
1.3
which protect beverages from damage by sunlight, and longer-lasting tennis balls
using butyl rubber/ nano-clay composites. Nanoscale titanium dioxide, for instance, is
finding applications in cosmetics, sun-block creams and self-cleaning windows, and
nanoscale silica is being used as filler in a range of products, including cosmetics and
dental fillings.
Brief History of Nanomaterials
The history of nanomaterials began immediately after the big bang when
Nanostructures were formed in the early meteorites. Nature later evolved many other
Nanostructures like seashells, skeletons etc. Nanoscaled smoke particles were formed
during the use of fire by early humans. The scientific story of nanomaterials however
began much later. One of the first scientific reports is the colloidal gold particles
synthesized by Michael Faraday as early as 1857. Nanostructured catalysts have also
been investigated for over 70 years. By the early 1940’s, precipitated and fumed silica
nanoparticles were being manufactured and sold in USA and Germany as substitutes
for ultrafine carbon black for rubber reinforcements.
Nanosized amorphous silica particles have found large-scale applications in
many every-day consumer products, ranging from non-diary coffee creamer to
automobile tires, optical fibers and catalyst supports. In the 1960s and 1970’s metallic
nano powders for magnetic recording tapes were developed. In 1976, for the first
time, nanocrystals produced by the now popular inert- gas evaporation technique was
published by Granqvist and Buhrman [2]. Recently it has been found that the Maya
blue paint is a nanostructured hybrid material. The origin of its color and its resistance
to acids and bio corrosion are still not understood but studies of authentic samples
from Jaina Island show that the material is made of needle-shaped palygorskite (clay)
crystals that form a super lattice with a period of 1.4 nm, with intercalates of
amorphous silicate substrate containing inclusions of metal (Mg) nanoparticles. The
beautiful tone of the blue color is obtained only when both these nanoparticles and the
super lattice are present, as has been shown by the fabrication of synthetic samples.
Today nanophase engineering expands in a rapidly growing number of
structural and functional materials, inorganic and organic, allowing manipulating
mechanical, catalytic, electric, magnetic, optical and electronic functions. The
production of nanophase or cluster-assembled materials is usually based upon the
Chapter 1
1.4
creation of separated small clusters which then are fused into a bulk-like material or
on their embedding into compact liquid or solid matrix materials. e.g. nanophase
silicon, which differs from normal silicon in physical and electronic properties, could
be applied to macroscopic semiconductor processes to create new devices.
For instance, when ordinary glass is doped with quantized semiconductor ''colloids,'' it
becomes a high performance optical medium with potential applications in optical
computing.
Classification of Nanomaterials
Nanomaterials have extremely small size which having at least one dimension 100 nm
or less. Nanomaterials can be nanoscale in one dimension (e.g. surface films), two
dimensions (e.g. strands or fibres), or three dimensions (e. g. particles). They can exist
in single, fused, aggregated or agglomerated forms with spherical, tubular, and
irregular shapes. Common types of nanomaterials include nanotubes, dendrimers,
quantum dots and fullerenes. Nanomaterials have applications in the field of nano
technology, and displays different physical chemical characteristics from normal
chemicals (i.e., silver nano, carbon nano tube, fullerene, photo catalyst, carbon nano,
silica).
According to Siegel [3], Nanostructured materials are classified as Zero
dimensional, one dimensional, two dimensional, three dimensional nanostructures.
Figure 1.1.3: Classification of Nanomaterials (a) 0D spheres and clusters (b) 1D
nanofibers, wires, and rods (c) 2D films, plates, and Networks
(d) 3D nanomaterials.
Nanomaterials are materials which are characterized by an ultra fine grain size (< 50
nm) or by a dimensionality limited to 50 nm. Nanomaterials can be created with
various modulation dimensionalities as defined by Richard W. Siegel [3], zero
(atomic clusters, filaments and cluster assemblies), one (multilayers), two (ultrafine-
Chapter 1
1.5
grained overlayers or buried layers), and three (nanophase materials consisting of
equiaxed nanometer sized grains) as shown in the above Figure 1.1.3.
Properties of Nanomaterials
Nanomaterials have the structural features in between of those of atoms and the bulk
materials. While most micro structured materials have similar properties to the
corresponding bulk materials, the properties of materials with nanometer dimensions
are significantly different from those of atoms and bulks materials. This is mainly due
to the nanometer size of the materials which render them: (i) large fraction of surface
atoms; (ii) high surface energy; (iii) spatial confinement; (iv) reduced imperfections,
which do not exist in the corresponding bulk materials.
Due to their small dimensions, nanomaterials have extremely large surface
area to volume ratio, which makes a large to be the surface or interfacial atoms,
resulting in more “surface” dependent material properties. Especially when the sizes
of nanomaterials are comparable to length, the entire material will be affected by the
surface properties of nanomaterials. This in turn may enhance or modify the
properties of the bulk materials. For example, metallic nanoparticles can be used as
very active catalysts. Chemical sensors from nanoparticles and nanowires enhanced
the sensitivity and sensor selectivity. The nanometer feature sizes of nanomaterials
also have spatial confinement effect on the materials, which bring the quantum
effects.
The energy band structure and charge carrier density in the materials can be
modified quite differently from their bulk and in turn will modify the electronic and
optical properties of the materials. For example, lasers and light emitting diodes
(LED) from both of the quantum dots and quantum wires are very promising in the
future optoelectronics. High density information storage using quantum dot devices is
also a fast developing area. Reduced imperfections are also an important factor in
determination of the properties of the nanomaterials. Nanostructures and
Nanomaterials favors of a self purification process in that the impurities and intrinsic
material defects will move to near the surface upon thermal annealing. This increased
materials perfection affects the properties of nanomaterials. For example, the
chemical stability for certain nanomaterials may be enhanced, the mechanical
properties of nanomaterials will be better than the bulk materials. The superior
Chapter 1
1.6
mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes are well known. Due to their nanometer
size, nanomaterials are already known to have many novel properties. Many novel
applications of the nanomaterials rose from these novel properties have also been
proposed [1].
Optical properties
One of the most fascinating and useful aspects of nanomaterials is their optical
properties. Applications based on optical properties of nanomaterials include optical
detector, laser, sensor, imaging, phosphor, display, solar cell, photocatalysis,
photoelectron chemistry and biomedicine.
The optical properties of nanomaterials depend on parameters such as feature
size, shape, surface characteristics, and other variables including doping and
interaction with the surrounding environment or other nanostructures. Likewise, shape
can have dramatic influence on optical properties of metal nanostructures. Figure1.1.4
exemplifies the difference in the optical properties of metal and semiconductor
nanoparticles. With the CdSe semiconductor nanoparticles, a simple change in size
alters the optical properties of the nanoparticles. When metal nanoparticles are
enlarged, their optical properties change only slightly as observed for the different
samples of gold nano spheres in Figure 1.1.4. However, when anisotropy is added to
the nanoparticle, such as growth of nano rods, the optical properties of the
nanoparticles change dramatically [4].
Figure 1.1.4: Fluorescence emission of (CdSe) ZnS quantum dots of various
sizes and absorption spectra of various sizes and shapes of gold
NPs.
Chapter 1
1.7
Electrical properties
Electrical Properties of Nanoparticles discuss about fundamentals of electrical
conductivity in nano tubes and nano rods, carbon nano tubes, photoconductivity of
nano rods, electrical conductivity of nano composites. One interesting method which
can be used to demonstrate the steps in conductance is the mechanical thinning of a
nano wire and measurement of the electrical current at a constant applied voltage. The
important point here is that, with decreasing diameter of the wire, the number of
electron wave modes contributing to the electrical conductivity is becoming
increasingly smaller by well-defined quantized steps.
In electrically conducting carbon nano tubes, only one electron wave mode is
observed which transport the electrical current. As the lengths and orientations of the
carbon nano tubes are different, they touch the surface of the mercury at different
times, which provides two sets of information: (i) the influence of carbon nano tube
length on the resistance; and (ii) the resistances of the different nano tubes. As the
nano tubes have different lengths, then with increasing protrusion of the fiber bundle
an increasing number of carbon nano tubes will touch the surface of the mercury
droplet and contribute to the electrical current transport [5].
Figure 1.1.5: Electrical behavior of nanotubes.
Mechanical properties
Mechanical Properties of Nanoparticles deals with bulk metallic and ceramic
materials, influence of porosity, influence of grain size, super plasticity, filled
polymer composites, particle-filled polymers, polymer-based nano composites filled
with platelets, carbon nano tube- based composites. The discussion of mechanical
properties of nanomaterials is, in to some extent, only of quite basic interest, the
reason being that it is problematic to produce macroscopic bodies with a high density
Chapter 1
1.8
and a grain size in the range of less than 100 nm. However, two materials, neither of
which is produced by pressing and sintering, have attracted much greater interest as
they will undoubtedly achieve industrial importance.
These materials are polymers which contain nanoparticles or nano tubes to
improve their mechanical behaviors, and severely plastic-deformed metals, which
exhibit astonishing properties. However, because of their larger grain size, the latter
are generally not accepted as nanomaterials. Experimental studies on the mechanical
properties of bulk nanomaterials are generally impaired by major experimental
problems in producing specimens with exactly defined grain sizes and porosities.
Therefore, model calculations and molecular dynamic studies are of major importance
for an understanding of the mechanical properties of these materials.
Filling polymers with nanoparticles or nano rods and nano tubes, respectively,
leads to significant improvements in their mechanical properties. Such improvements
depend heavily on the type of the filler and the way in which the filling is conducted.
The latter point is of special importance, as any specific advantages of a nano
particulate filler may be lost if the filler forms aggregates, thereby mimicking the
large particles. Particulate filled polymer-based nanocomposites exhibit a broad range
of failure strengths and strains. This depends on the shape of the filler, particles or
platelets, and on the degree of agglomeration. In this class of material, polymers filled
with silicate platelets exhibit the best mechanical properties and are of the greatest
economic relevance. The larger the particles of the filler or agglomerates, the poorer
are the properties obtained. Although, potentially, the best composites are those filled
with nano fibers or nano tubes, experience teaches that sometimes such composites
have the least ductility. On the other hand, by using carbon nano tubes it is possible to
produce composite fibers with extremely high strength and strain at rupture. Among
the most exciting nano composites are the polymer ceramic nano composites, where
the ceramic phase is platelet-shaped. This type of composite is preferred in nature,
and is found in the structure of bones, where it consists of crystallized mineral
platelets of a few nanometers thickness that are bound together with collagen as the
matrix. Composites consisting of a polymer matrix and defoliated phyllosilicates
exhibit excellent mechanical and thermal properties [1].
M
B
at
in
ph
n
p
w
su
In
as
H
ap
fe
fe
o
or
ro
b
d
Magnetic pro
Bulk gold an
toms are no
nteraction w
henomenon
anoparticles
ossible that
when prepare
urprising cas
n the case o
ssociated wi
Fi
However, go
ppropriate m
erromagnetic
Surfac
erromagnetic
f these nob
rdering temp
oom temper
elow 2 nm t
ensity of s
operties
nd Pt are non
ot only diff
with other ch
opens the
by capping
non-ferrom
ed in nano ra
se of Au (th
of Pt and P
ith size effec
igure 1.1.6:
old nanopar
molecules: t
c-like behav
ce and the
c and param
ble metals c
peratures. M
rature for th
the localized
states and b
n-magnetic,
fferent to bu
hemical spec
e possibility
g them with
magnetic bul
ange. One ca
at is diamag
Pd, the ferr
cts.
Magnetic p
ticles becom
the charge
vior.
core of A
magnetic char
can yield to
More surprisi
hiol-capped
d carriers are
becomes di
Chapter 1
1.9
but at the n
ulk atoms,
cies, that is,
y to modif
h appropriat
lk materials
an obtain ma
gnetic in bulk
omagnetism
properties of
me ferroma
localized at
Au nanoparti
racter, respe
o a large an
ingly, perma
Au nanopar
e in the 5d b
iamagnetic,
nano size th
but they ca
, by capping
fy the phy
te molecules
exhibit ferr
agnetic nanop
k) from non
m arises from
f nano struc
gnetic when
t the partic
icles with 2
ctively. The
nisotropy an
anent magne
rticles. For
band. Bulk A
as is also
hey are magn
an also be
g the nanop
ysical prope
s. Actually,
romagnetic-
particles of P
-magnetic b
m the struct
ctured mate
n they are
cle surface
2 nm in di
e large spin-o
nd therefore
etism was ob
nanoparticl
Au has an e
the case
netic. Surfac
modified b
particles. Th
erties of th
it should b
like behavio
Pd, Pt and th
ulk material
tural change
erials.
capped wit
gives rise t
iameter sho
orbit couplin
exhibit hig
bserved up t
es with size
extremely lo
for bare A
ce
by
his
he
be
or
he
ls.
es
th
to
w
ng
gh
to
es
w
Au
Chapter 1
1.10
nanoparticles. This observation suggested that modification of the d band structure by
chemical bonding can induce ferromagnetic like character in metallic clusters [1].
Why nanoparticles exhibit such properties?
Quantum confinement
Quantum confinement is a very successful model for describing the size dependent
electronic structure of nanometer sized semiconductor structures [6]. Generally
speaking, it predicts increasing band gaps with decreasing particle sizes due to
shifting of the band edges. The majority of theoretical investigations on quantum
confinement effects were performed on isolated particles with idealized structures and
surface terminations. The quantum confinement effect can be observed once the
diameter of the particle is of the magnitude as the wavelength of electron wave
function [6]. When the materials are so small, their electronic and optical properties
deviate substantially from those of bulk materials. A particle behaves as if it were free
when the confining dimension is large compared to the wavelength of the particle.
During this state, band gap remains at its original energy due to continuous energy
state. However, as the confining dimension decreases and reaches a certain limit,
typically in nanoscale, the energy spectrum turns to discrete as it is shown in
Figure 1.1.7 [7]. As a result, band gap becomes size dependent. This ultimately results
a blue shift in optical illumination as the size of the particles decreases. Specifically,
the effect describes the phenomenon that results from electrons and electrons-holes
being squeezed into a dimension that approaches a critical quantum measurement,
called the excitons Bohr radius. In current application, a quantum dot confines in all
three dimensions such as a small sphere, a quantum wire confines in two dimensions,
and a quantum well confines in one dimension.
Surface to volume ratio
It plays a very important role in technology. As the surface area increases the
complete term increases but the volume remains same. Nanostructures and
nanomaterials possess a large fraction of surface atoms per unit volume. The ratio of
surface atom to interior atoms changes dramatically if one successively divides a
macroscopic object into smaller parts [6]. Such a drastic increase in the ratio of
surface atoms to interior atoms in nanostructures and nanomaterials might illustrate
Chapter 1
1.11
why changes in size range of nanometers are expected to lead to great changes in
physical and chemical properties of the material. As the scale decreases (keeping the
volume constant) the surface area of the material increases as shown in Figure 1.1.8
[8] and with increase in surface area the ability of the particles to interact with other
particle increases. Also the physical and chemical properties like interactive forces,
reactivity etc. increases. So the S/V ratio has a significant effect on the properties of
nanoparticles.
Figure 1.1.7: Representation of quantum confinement.
Figure 1.1.8: Representation of surface to volume ratio.
Chapter 1
1.12
Brownian motion
Brownian motion is characterized by the constant and erratic movement of minute
particles in a liquid or gas. The molecules that make up the fluid, in which the
particles are suspended, as a result of the inherently random nature of their motions,
colloid with the larger suspended particles at random, making them move, in turn,
also randomly. At macroscale we barely see the movement of particles or why they
move but at nanoscale the particles moves widely batted about by a smaller paticle.
Potential Applications of Nanomaterials
High – density magnetic data storage arrays provide a major technological driving
force for the exploration of magnetic nanomaterials. Surface and interface driven
properties play a role in all applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Various interesting
physical properties due to quantum size effect are currently of great fundamental and
application interest. Some of the recent developments associated with magnetic
nanomaterials are given here.
Information Storage
Since the 1940s with the sudden growth in popularity of magnetic recording,γ-Fe2O3
in the form of small single domain particles has dominated the magnetic storage
materials technology [9]. The data storage industry is driving towards higher densities
of stored ‘bits’. If a reliable data storage system based on a single 5 nm magnetic
nanoparticles acting as an individual bit of information could be created, storage
densities of 10 Gbit/cm2 would be possible [10]. The presence of silica was found to
enhance coercively of cobalt ferrite nanomaterials [11].
Electronic Devices
Today multifunctional laptops and palmtops are more users friendly, faster, handy and
have large memory capacities. Mobile phones, pocket sized memory storage devices
and the widely used MP3 players, iPods are perhaps the most convincing benefits of
nanomaterials. Most of them make use of magnetic materials such as ferrites.
Quantum Computers
With the ability to synthesize quantum dots on a commercial scale, it has become
possible to exploit the laws of quantum mechanics for novel quantum computers,
Chapter 1
1.13
using fast quantum algorithms. Quantum computers can perform several computations
at the same time and are much faster. Quantum dots were discovered by Louis E.
Brus, at Bell Labs in 1980 and he was awarded fist Kavli prize in nanoscience in 2008
for his pioneering efforts in this field [12]. Quantum dots are semiconductor materials
in the nano scale, normally in the size range of 1 – 20 nm. Most of the Q-dots are
composed of group II – VI and III – V elements of periodic table. Some examples of
Q – dots are CdSe, CdS, CdTe, GaAs, InAs etc. currently Q-dots are being used in
imaging, labeling, sensing [13] solar cells [14].
Sensors
Sensors made of nanocrystalline materials are extremely sensitive to change in the
environment. Some of the applications for the sensors made of nanocrystalline
materials are some detectors, ice detectors on aircraft wings and automobile engine
performance sensors. Ferrite nanoparticles can be used as LPG sensors [15].
Medical Applications
Nanomaterials have dimensions similar to those of biological molecules and hence
useful for biomedical applications. By attaching different biomolecules to
nanomaterials, they can be used in medical applications for specific functions.
Nanotechnology is being developed for both therapeutic (using nano drug delivery
system) and diagnostic (nano biosensors) applications. Nanoparticles have shown
potentials for detecting virus, pre-cancerous cells, treatment of hyperthermia etc.
targeted delivery systems using Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles can deliver drugs
effectively and conveniently with increased patience compliance, extended product
life and reduced healthcare cost [16, 17].
Filtration
Magnetic nanoparticles offer an effective and reliable method to remove heavy metal
contaminants from waste water by use of magnetic separation techniques. Nanoscale
particles increase the efficiency to absorb contaminants. Since nanomaterials posses
unique properties they can be used for variety of applications ranging from toothpaste
to satellites. Nanotechnology is finding applications in virtually all fields ranging
from science to engineering, influencing our life style in many ways.
Chapter 1
1.14
Catalysis
Catalysis from nanoparticles is beneficiary due to the extremely large surface to
volume ratio. The application potential of nanoparticles in catalysis ranges from fuel
cell to catalytic converters and photocatalytic devices. Catalysis is also important for
the production of chemicals. Platinum nanoparticles are now being considered in the
next generation of automotive catalytic converters because the very high surface area
of nanoparticles could reduce the amount of platinum required [18].
1.2 Magnetic Nanoparticles
Introduction
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have been the focus of an increasing amount of the
recent literature, which has chronicled research into both the fabrication and
applications of MNPs. The explosion of research in this area is driven by the
extensive technological applications of MNPs which includes single – bit elements in
high – density magnetic data storage arrays, magneto – optical switches, and novel
photo – luminescent materials. In biomedicine, MNPs serve as contrast enhancement
agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, selective probes for bio – molecular
interactions and cell sorters. Nanoparticles of magnetic materials are also find
applications as catalyst, nucleators for the growth of high-aspect-ratio nano-materials,
and toxic waste remediation. Methodologies for the synthesis of MNPs are being
developed by scientists working in fields such as spanning Biology, Chemistry and
Materials Science. In the last decade, these efforts have provided access to nanoscale
magnetic materials ranging from inorganic metal clusters to custom – built Single
molecular Magnets [19].
The properties associated with the bulk magnetic materials are the same as that
in magnetic nanoparticles but due to the smaller size, magnetic nanoparticles show
interesting properties as compared to bulk particles. In magnetic nanoparticles some
of the new phenomenon like superparamagnetism and spin canting can be realized
which may not be seen in bulk magnetic particles. The saturation magnetization of the
magnetic nanoparticles is found to have less value when compared to bulk magnetic
particles. However, the coercivity of the magnetic nanoparticles is more value than
that of bulk magnetic particles.
Chapter 1
1.15
Magnetic Materials and Superparamagnetism
Materials which can be magnetized are called magnetic materials. The response of
materials is different at electronic, atomic, molecular and microscopic level to an
applied magnetic field. In different materials, the magnetic effect varies from weak to
strong. Application wise, magnetic materials are classified as soft and hard magnetic
materials and on account of their behavior, they are classified as diamagnetic,
paramagnetic, ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, ferrimagnetic and
superparamagnetic. The diamagnetic materials are weakly repelled by an external
magnetic field and show negative susceptibility, paramagnetic materials show small
and positive susceptibility and are weakly attracted by external magnetic field.
Ferromagnetic materials exhibit a large and positive susceptibility and are strongly
attracted towards magnetic field. In case of diamagnetic and paramagnetic materials,
the magnetic properties do not persist on the removal of external magnetic field.
In case of ferromagnetic materials, these properties are stable even after the external
magnetic field is removed.
Antiferromagnetic substances have small positive susceptibility at all
temperature but their susceptibility vary in a particular way with temperature. When
the spins are antiparallel due to negative interaction, it results in anti –
ferromagnetism.
Ferrimagnetic materials have magnetic moments of adjacent atoms as aligned
in opposite directions, but their magnitudes are not equal and opposite. So, there
exists a net magnetic moment which may have a value less than that in ferromagnetic
materials. The moment disappears above Curie temperature.
Superparamagnetism is a phenomenon in which magnetic materials may
exhibit the behavior similar to paramagnetism even when at temperatures below the
Curie or the Neel temperature [20,21]. The whole particle represents as single domain
having all atomic moments ordered. The magnetization of the particle is no longer
fixed in the direction dictated by the particle shape or crystal anisotropy, as the
frequently jump between different stable orientations of the magnetization. When a
system is in metastable equilibrium, the probability ‘p’ per unit time will switch out
the metastable state and will get into the more stable demagnetized state, given by:
Chapter 1
1.16
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ Δ−=
bTkfVvP exp0 (1)
In equation (1), v0 is an attempt frequency factor equal to approximately 10-9s-1, V is
the particle volume and ΔfV is the free energy barrier that the particle moment must
surmount to leave the metastable state. In a particle with strong crystalline anisotropy,
Δf is equal to magneto crystalline anisotropy Kb. (The magnetization appears to be
zero in a time scale large as compared to the typical time flipping).
Application of an external magnetic field to an ensemble of such thermally
demagnetized particle results in a much larger magnetic response than that would be
the case of paramagnets, because now each local moments have magnitude N’μm
instead of μm, where N’ is the number of magnetic atoms in the particle. Thus, the
susceptibility of a super – paramagnetic is increased (N’) 2 fold.
For KuV << KT, the magnetic moments exhibit superparamagnetic relaxation
and the relaxation time can be given in a simplified way as:
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛=
TkKV
B
exp0ττ (2)
In equation (2), τ0 is the characteristic time (10-10s), K is the anisotropy energy
(20,000 J/m3 for iron oxide) and V is the volume of the particle, kB is the Boltzmann
constant and T is the temperature.
When the superparamagnetic relaxation time is short compared to the time
scale of the experimental method used for the magnetic properties, the sample
resembles a paramagnetic. The relaxation time depends on temperature and so by
decreasing the temperature, τ0 can be made larger than the time scale of measurement
and then the magnetic moment of the particle becomes measurable.
Spin canting
A spin canting is one of the parasitic phenomenons, it negatively reflects in a
capability of nano objects to be easily controlled by an external magnetic field. It is
governed by finite size effects and surface effects.
In case of nanoparticles, the surface plays very important role in order to
decide the magnetic properties. Normal coordination, in the interior, breaks down at
the surface to have very different forms [22]. Spin structures of such nanoparticles is
Chapter 1
1.17
very complicated as compared to their bulk counterpart [23]. Spin canting can be
investigated by using Mossbauer spectroscopy in high magnetic field [24].
The main effect of finite size on magnetic nanoparticles is that, the broken
exchange bonds for the surface atoms become dominant. This can have a particularly
strong effect on ionic materials. Since the exchange interactions are mainly anti –
ferromagnetic and which happens only through super – exchange interactions. It
crucially depends on the bond length and the bonds are moved from the surface, there
can be frustration and canted spin order in case of these magnetic nanoparticles.
Some important uses of magnetic nanoparticles
High density magnetic data storage arrays provide a major technological driving force
for the exploration of MNPs. If a reliable data storage system based on a single 5 nm
MNP acting as an individual bit of information could be created, storage densities of
10 Gbit/cm2 would be possible [25]. MNPs have also demonstrated to be functional
elements in magneto – optical switches [26], sensors based on Giant Magneto
resistance [27], and magnetically controllable Single Electron Transistor devices
[28], or photonic crystals [29]. One of the first stages in the development of these
MNP – based materials is the creation of ordered 2 – and 3 – dimensional arrays of
MNPs [30]. Two dimensional arrays are typically fabricated by the slow evaporation
of highly monodispersed MNP solutions onto a substrate [31]. Structural control can
be achieved by the application of a magnetic field [32] or patterning using dip – pen
nanolithography [33]. Three dimensional nanoparticles assembles with complex
structures can also be fabricated by the slow evaporation technique in the presence of
an applied magnetic field [34]. These technological applications are all in the addition
to the numerous known and developed applications of aqueous suspensions of MNPs
(ferro fluids) [35].
1.3 Introduction to Ferrites
Among the numerous classes and types of magnetic materials, the ferrite occupies a
special class. Ferrites are widely used magnetic materials as they posses excellent
electrical as well as magnetic properties. The interesting physical and chemical
properties of ferro spinels arise from their ability to distribute the cations among the
available sites. The knowledge of cation distribution is essential to understand the
Chapter 1
1.18
physical properties. On account of their combined properties, they can be used in
many applications which include fabrication of magnetic cores of read/write heads for
high speed digital tapes or disc recording [36, 37].
Ferrites are the ferrimagnetic materials consisting of iron oxide and metal
oxides. On the basis of their crystal structure, they can be grouped into four main
types, namely spinel ferrite (MFe2O4, M = Co, Ni, Cu, Mn etc.) hexagonal ferrite
(MeFe12O19, Me = Ba, Sr or Pb, Ca), Ortho ferrite (RFeO3, e.g. BaTiO3, PbTiO3),
Garnet (R3Fe5O12, R = Y or rare earth ions like La, Gd, Dy etc). In the family of
ferrites, over many years, spinel ferrites have been subject of concern due to their
wide possibilities of applications in electronics and radio engineering. The advantages
of spinel ferrite as magnetic materials are due to their high values of electrical
resistivity, high saturation magnetization, high permeability, low eddy current and
dielectric losses [38].
Why Ferrites in 21st Century?
Figure 1.3.1: Number of publications on Magnetic materials (Year wise).
Though, the field of ferrite materials is well cultivated, but due to its potential
applications in various field, even after 60-65 years, after first artificial synthesis and
characterization of spinel ferrite system, scientists, researchers, technologists and
engineers are still interested in various types of ferrite systems, substituted with
different cations, prepared by different synthesis techniques, in bulk, thin film and
Chapter 1
1.19
nanocrystalline form and its various properties such as, structural, magnetic,
electrical, dielectric, optical, infrared spectral, mechanical etc.
From Figure 1.3.1 it is quite clear that since the year 2000 number of
publications on magnetic materials, particularly in the field of nanocrystalline ferrites
increases so rapidly [39], which supports the fact that research in the field of ferrites
in 21st century is still the subject of large interest and possibilities.
Nanocrystalline spinel ferrites
Recently, nano – magnetic materials have attained great interest because of their
potential applications in many fields like high density data storage, ferro – fluid,
magneto – optical recording, magneto – caloric refrigeration, magnetic resonance
imaging, drug delivery etc [40], the synthesis of magnetic materials on the nano scale
has been a field of intense study, due to the novel macroscopic properties shown by
particles of quantum dimensions located in the transition region between atoms and
bulk solids [41]. Quantum size effect and the large surface area of magnetic
nanoparticles dramatically change some of the magnetic properties and exhibit
superparamagnetic phenomena and quantum tunneling of magnetization, because
each particle can be considered as single magnetic domain.
Magnetic nanoparticles of spinel ferrites are of great interest in fundamental
science, especially for addressing the fundamental relationships between magnetic
properties and their crystal chemistry and structure. Crystal chemistry shows how the
chemical composition (chemical formula), internal structure and physical properties
of minerals are linked together. Spinel ferrites have been investigated in recent years
for their useful electrical and magnetic properties and applications in information
storage systems, magnetic bulk cores, magnetic fluids, microwave absorbers and
medical diagnostics. The synthesis and magnetic structure characterization of spinel
metastable nano ferrites have been investigated with much interest [42] and a lot of
attention has been focused on the preparation and characterization of
superparamagnetic metal oxide nanoparticles of spinel ferrites [42]. The rich crystal
chemistry in spinel ferrite systems offers excellent opportunities for understanding
and fine tuning the superparamagnetic properties of nanoparticles by chemical
manipulations.
Chapter 1
1.20
A wide variety of techniques are being used to synthesize nanostructured
materials including gas condensation, rapid solidification, electrodeposition,
sputtering, crystallization of amorphous phases, wet-chemical methods like co
precipitation, sonochemical reactions, sol–gel method, combustion, reverse micelle
technique, hydrothermal route and mechanical attrition-ball milling [42].
The magnetic, electric and dielectric behavior of spinel ferrites decisively
depends upon the structural properties. Therefore, the non-destructive methods of
characterization such as X-ray diffraction and infrared spectroscopy especially suited
for such investigations. The wavelength of X-ray, electrons and neutrons are
comparable to the interplanner distances in solids. Because of high penetrating power,
X-ray can provide important information regarding structural properties of matter.
The angle of diffraction and intensity of diffracted beam together are characteristics of
a particular crystal structure since no two atoms have exactly the same size and X-ray
scattering ability; the intensities of diffracted beam will be unique for every material.
This uniqueness helps to identify the structure and determine the structural parameters
of the material [43].
The use of nanoparticles as catalysts in organic transformation has attracted
considerable interest in recent years [44]. Spinel ferrites offer more interesting
catalytic activities compared to the corresponding single component metal oxides
[45]. Spinel ferrite nanocrystals are regarded as one of the most important inorganic
nanomaterials because of their electronic, optical, electrical, magnetic and catalytic
properties, all of which are different from their bulk counterparts. These properties are
dependent on chemical composition and microstructrual characteristics, where the
particle size and shape might be controlled in the fabrication processes [44].
Irradiation of ferrites is a powerful tool to enhance crystallographic defects
and changes in properties of ferrites [45]. Various kinds of radiation such as fast
neutron, energetic ions and γ rays were used to study the effect of radiation on the
properties of ferrites with different compositions. The obtained data are important for
evaluation of the ferrites performance in electronic components used in highly
radioactive environment such as nuclear facilities. Even the satellites and spacecrafts
can be exposed to cosmic radiations of rather high accumulated dose. The changes in
hysteresis loop parameters and magnetization in bulk spinel ferrites due to
Chapter 1
1.21
γ irradiation and heavy ions were investigated for several types of ferrites. However,
if the change in electrical or magnetic properties of ferrites is linearly dependant on
absorbed dose, the ferrites can be used to develop sensitive dosimeter [45].
Defect distribution plays a dominant role in tuning the properties of ferrites.
The positron annihilation lifetime (PAL) spectroscopy is one of the powerful
techniques for measuring the change in properties of structural defects in a wide
variety of solids. The PAL technique was used to study the electron density and to
determine the structure, nature, and concentration of point and extended defects in
ferrites. Also, the induced defects and changes in electron density and grain size by
irradiation can be accurately analyzed using this technique. The injected positron,
emitted from a 22Na source, into solids is thermalized and diffused to a depth of a few
hundred μm. The positron is either delocalized or trapped in defects, which lead to an
increase of its lifetime. Also, the positron may extract an electron from the
surrounding material to form a positronium atom (Ps) with two states; a singlet state
(para-Ps, p-Ps) and a triplet state (ortho-Ps, o-Ps). In both cases, the positron will
eventually annihilate with an electron and will have a corresponding lifetime with a
corresponding intensity for each state at annihilation site. Each lifetime component
has a corresponding intensity (I1, I2) relating to the number of annihilations occurring
at a particular lifetime (τ1, τ2). Therefore, the detection of annihilation g rays due to
trapping of positron in tetrahedral and octahedral sites is an indication for lifetime of
the impeded positrons in ferrite sample which reflect the size of defects and the ionic
distribution. The PAL technique was therefore employed successfully in studying
several types of ferrites [45].
Studies of the relations between structure and the electromagnetic response of
ferromagnetic semiconductors are useful in understanding their properties. Infrared
absorption spectroscopy has been used to study the occurrence of various absorption
bands in the spectra and analyzed on the basis of different cations present on A- and
B-sites of spinel lattice. It is used to determine the local symmetry in crystalline/non-
crystalline solids, ordering phenomenon in spinels, presence/absence of Fe2+- ions,
also to determine force constants, elastic moduli, Debye temperature, and heat
capacity of ferrite materials [46].
Chapter 1
1.22
In case of nanoparticles, the calcinations temperature determines the size of
the particle and crystallinity. Crystallization temperature is different for different
materials. In the thermogravimetric analysis, the temperature region which does not
contain any peaks represents the crystallization region. So this is an efficient tool for
the determination of temperature at which crystallization or recrystallization occur
[47]. Study of phase transition in nanoparticles in comparison with that in the bulk
materials has wide spread appreciation [48].
1.4 Aim and Outline of the present work According to the existing literature, cobalt ferrite, CoFe2O4, is an inverse spinel taken
to be collinear ferrimagnet [49], with magnetic moment of 3 μB at 80 K and Neel
temperature of 825 K [50]. Nanocrystalline CoFe2O4 with fcc spinel structure has
potential applications in the field of medicine, high density data storage, catalysis,
sensors, magnetic recording [51]. Cobalt ferrite exhibits high dc resistivity, positive
anisotropy constant, large magnetostriction, high permittivity and low losses made
them suitable for microwave device applications.
Transition metal chromites with the general chemical formula MCr2O4, are of
interest because of their technological applications as catalysts (ZnCr2O4), refractories
(CaCr2O4 and MgCr2O4), and pigments and glazes (CoCr2O4) [52]. Spinel cobalt
chromite, CoCr2O4, is a new spiral magnet that has been recently found to exhibit
strong magnetoelectric coupling [53]. Thus, expected to be useful in tailoring electric
polarization. In addition, they often serve as model systems for studying low
temperature magnetic phenomena [54].
Cobalt ferrite and cobalt-ferrite based composites have received recent
attention, as promising materials for magnetomechanical strain sensing and actuating
applications, and multiferroic materials [55]. CoCr2O4 is a normal spinel with canted
ferromagnetic structure and its Curie temperature is 97 K [56]. Cobalt ferrite,
CoFe2O4, and cobalt chromite, CoCr2O4, and their solid solutions CoCrxFe2-xO4 (x =
0.0 – 2.0) have attracted large number of chemists, physicists and metallurgists to
study their different aspects [51 – 57].
Manganese ferrite, MnFe2O4, is considered as a most controversial and
complex spinel ferrite [58]. The cation distribution, degree of inversion, oxidation
state of Fe3+ and Mn2+ and particularly its magnetic properties are still a subject of
Chapter 1
1.23
interest. On the other hand, MgFe2O4, is a partially inverse spinel and it can be
considered as a collinear ferrimagnet whose degree of inversion depends on the
thermal history of the sample.
Apart from the spinel composition and cation distribution, it is known that
physical properties can also tailored both by controlling the size of the nanocrystalline
domains and by the morphology of the material itself.
The purpose of the work is double sided. Initially we have presented the
important observations which were obtained from more conventional experimental
techniques such as XRD, TEM, EDAX, TGA, DSC etc. and highlight the changes
occurring at the different stages of substitution. The emphasis is thereafter diverted to
demonstrate the ability of nanoparticles to degrade pollutants and positron
annihilation techniques to sense such changes. The latter two aspects are of
importance since such works are scarcely available in the literature so far, and
secondly it offers a viable investigative probe for such studies which are highly
essential in the current scenario of novel material and arising challenges in their
understanding of macrostructure and preparative parameters [59]. The system under
investigation MgxMn1-xFe2O4 (x = 0.0 – 1.0) belongs to a large class of compounds
having general chemical formula A2+B23+O4
2- and crystallize in the spinel structure.
Nanoparticles of spinel ferrite systems with general chemical formulae,
CoCrxFe2-xO4 (x = 0.0 – 2.0) and MgxMn1-xFe2O4 (x = 0.0 – 1.0) have been
synthesized by the co-precipitation route. The synthesized samples have been
characterized by employing various experimental tools.
(i) X-ray powder diffractometry at 300 K.
(ii) Energy dispersive analysis of X-rays at 300 K.
(iii) Particle size distribution study at 300 K.
(iv) Transmission electron microscopic study at 300 K.
(v) Thermo gravimetric and differential scanning calorimetric analysis at
30 – 700 °C.
(vi) Mossbauer spectroscopic study at 300 K.
(vii) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant like nitrobenzene and
herbicide like 2, 4 – Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2, 4–D), studies have been
carried out under UV light irradiation.
Chapter 1
1.24
(viii) Crystal defects and cation redistribution study on nanocrystalline cobalt-ferri-
chromites by positron annihilation spectroscopy at 300 K.
Chapter 1
1.25
References
1. A. Alagarasi, ‘Introduction to Nanomaterials’, (http://www.nccr.iitm.ac.in).
2. R. A. Buhrman, C. G. Granqvist, ‘Ultrafine metal particles’, J. Appl. Phys., 47
(5) (1976) 32870 – 80.
3. R. W. Siegel, ‘Mechanical properties and deformation behavior of materials
having ultrafine microstructures’, Kluwar Academic Publishers, (1993) p.509.
4. S. Eustis, M. A. El-Sayed, ‘Why gold nanoparticles are more precious than
pretty gold: Noble metal surface Plasmon resonance and its enhancement of
the radiative and nonradiative properties of nanocrystals of different shapes’,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 35 (2006) 209 – 217.
5. P. G. Collins, P. Avouris, ‘Nanotubes for Electronics’, Scientific American,
283 (2000) 62 – 69.
6. http://www.en.wikipedia.org.
7. http://www.ntt-review.
8. http://www.biologyjunction.com.
9. D. J. Craik, ‘Magnetic Oxides’, Part 2, Ed., Wiley Inter – science, (1975),
London, New York.
10. G. I. Frolov, ‘Film carriers for super-high-density magnetic storage’,
Technical Physics, 46 (12) (2001) 1537 – 1544.
11. S. R. Makala, J. Ding, ‘Magnetic properties of cobalt/SiO2 nano composite’,
J. Alloys. and Comp., 296 (1-2) (2000) 152 – 156.
12. Robert Bogue, ‘Quantum dots: a bright future for photonic nano sensors’,
Sensor Review, 30 (4) (2010) 279 – 284.
13. Igor L. Medintz, H. Tetuo Uyeda, Ellen R. Goldman, Hedi Mattoussi,
‘Quantum dot bio-conjugates for imaging, labeling and sensing’, Nature
Materials, 4 (6) (2005) 435 – 46.
14. Jongmin Kim, Hongsik Choi, Changwoo Nahm, Hoonhee Moon, Chohui Kim,
Seunghoon Nam, Dae-Ryong Jung, Byungwoo Park, ‘The effect of a blocking
layer on the photovoltaic performance in CdS quantum-dot-sensitized solar
cells’, J. Power Sources, 196 (23) (2011) 10526 – 10531.
Chapter 1
1.26
15. J. Y. Patil, M. S. Khandekar, I. S. Mulla, S. S. Suryavanshi, ‘Combustion
synthesis of magnesium ferrite as liquid petroleum gas (LPG) sensor: Effect of
sintering temperature’, Current Appl. Phys., 12 (2012) 319 – 324.
16. Manuel Arruebo, Rodrigo Fernandez – Pacheco, M. Ricardo lbarra, Jesus
Santamaria, ‘Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery’, Nano Today, 2 (3)
(2007) 22 – 32.
17. Q. A. Pankhurst, J. Connolly, S. K. Jones, J. Dobson, ‘Application of magnetic
nanoparticles in biomedicine’, Journal of Physics D: Appl. Phys., 36 (13)
(2013) R167 – R181.
18. Rimi Sharma, Sonal Singhal, ‘Structural, magnetic and electrical properties of
zinc doped nickel ferrite and their application in photo catalytic degradation of
methylene blue’, Physica B: Condensed Matter, 414 (1) (2013) 83 – 90.
19. Vincent Rotello, ‘Nanoparticles Building Blocks for Nanotechnology’,
Springer Int. Ed., 2010.
20. C. P. Bean, J. D. Livingston, ‘Superparamagnetism ‘, J. Appl. Phys., 30 (4)
(1959) S120 – S129.
21. C. E. Deshpande, S. K. Date, ‘Magnetism in Materials – Processing and
Microstructure’, METALS MATERIALS AND PROCESSES, (7) (1995)
15 – 18.
22. J. F. Hochepied, M. P. Pileni, ‘Magnetic properties of mixed cobalt – zinc
ferrite nanoparticles’, J. Appl. Phys., 87 (5) (2000) 2472 – 2478.
23. S. K. Okuno, S. Hashimoto, K. Inomata, ‘Preferred crystal orientation of
cobalt ferrite thin films induced by ion bombardment during deposition’,
J. Appl. Phys., 71 (12) (1992) 5926 – 5929.
24. Jae Gwang Lee, Jae Yun Park, Chul Sung Kim, ‘Growth of ultra-fine cobalt
ferrite particles by a sol-gel method and their magnetic properties’,
J. Mater. Sci., 33 (15) (1998) 3965 – 3968.
25. G. I. Frolov, ‘Film carriers for super-high-density magnetic storage’,
Tech. Phys., 46 (12) (2001) 1537 – 1544.
Chapter 1
1.27
26. E. Hasmonay, E. Dubois, J. C. Bacri, R. Perzynski, Y. L. Railher,
V. I. Stepnov, ‘Static magneto-optical birefringence of size-sorted γ-Fe2O3
nanoparticles’, The Eur. Phys. Jour. B – Condensed Matter and Complex
Systems, 5 (4-6) (1998) 859 – 867.
27. D. Kechrakos, K. N. Trohindou, J. A. Blackman, ‘Scaling behavior of the
giant magnetoresistance of magnetic aggregates’, Phys. Rev. B, 63 (13) (2001)
134422 – 26.
28. K. Yakushiji, S. Mitani, K. Takanashi, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, H.
Imamura, H. Fujimori, ‘Enhanced tunnel magnetoresistance in granular
nanobridges’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 78 (4) (2001) 515 – 517.
29. X. Xu, G. Friedman, K. D. Humfeld, S. A. Majetich, S. A. Asher, ‘Synthesis
and utilization of monodisperse superparamagnetic colloidal particles for
magnetically controllable photonic crystals’, Chem. Mater., 14 (3) (2002)
1249 – 1256.
30. K. J. Kirk, ‘Nano magnets for sensors and data storage’, Cont. Phys., 41 (2)
(2000) 61 – 78.
31. C. B. Murry, S. Sun, H. Doyle, T. Betley, ‘Monodisperse 3d transition metal
(Co, Ni, Fe) nanoparticles and their assembly into nanoparticles superlattices’,
MRS Bulletin, 26 (12) (2001) 985 – 991.
32. M. Giersig, M. Hilgendorff, ‘The preparation of ordered colloidal magnetic
particles by magnetophoretic deposition’, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 32 (22)
(1999)
33. X. Liu, L. Fu, S. Hong, V. P. Dravid, C. A. Mirkin, ‘Arrays of magnetic
nanoparticles patterned via “Dip-Pen” nanolithography’, Adv. Mater. 14 (3)
(2002) 231 – 234.
34. M. P. Pileni, ‘Fabrication and properties of nano sized material made by using
colloidal assemblies as templates’, Crystal Research and Technology,
33 (7-8) (1998) 1155 – 1186.
35. B. M. Berkovskill, V. F. Medvedev, M. S. Krakov, ‘Magnetic Fluids:
Engineering Applications’, Oxford University Press, USA, 1st Ed. (Dec 1993).
Chapter 1
1.28
36. Kurikka V. P. M. Shafi, Yuri Koltypin, Asaron Gedanken, Ruslan Prozorov,
Judit Balogh, Janos Lendvai, Israel Felner, ‘Sonochemical properties of nano
sized amorphous NiFe2O4 particles’, J. Phys. Chem. B, 101 (33) (1997)
6409 – 6414.
37. H. Lgarashi, K. Okazaki, ‘Effect of porosity and grain size on the magnetic
properties of NiZn ferrite’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 60 (1-2) (1977) 51 – 54.
38. K. J. Standley, ‘Oxide Magnetic Materials’, Oxford University Press, 2nd Ed.,
(1972).
39. http://www.nistads.res.in.
40. Sonal Singhal, Sheenu Jauhar, Jagdish Singh, Kailash Chadra, Sandeep
Bansal, ‘Investigation of structural, magnetic, electrical and optical properties
of chromium substituted cobalt ferrites (CoCrxFe2-xO4, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1) synthesized
using sol gel auto combustion method’, J. Mol. Struct., 1012 (2012)
182 – 188.
41. M. Mozaffari, F. Ebrahimi, S. Daneshfozon, J. Amighian, ‘Preparation of Mn-
Zn ferrite nanocrystalline powders via mechanochemical processing’,
J. Alloys and Comp., 449 (1-2) (2008) 65 – 67.
42. C. Suryanarayana, ‘Mechanical alloying and milling’, Progress in Material
Science, 46 (1-2) (2001) 1 – 184.
43. S. S. Bhatu, V. K. Lakhani, A. R. Tanna, N. H. Vasoya, J. U. Buch, P. U.
Sharma, U. N. Trivedi, H. H. Joshi, K. B. Modi, ‘Effect of nickel substitution
on structural, infrared and elastic properties of lithium ferrite’, Ind. J. Pure
Appl. Phys., 45 (07) (2007) 596 – 608.
44. M. Kooti, M. Afshari, ‘Magnetic cobalt ferrite nanoparticles as an efficient
catalyst for oxidation of alkenes’, Sci. Iranica, 19 (6) (2012) 1991 – 1995.
45. H. E. Hassan, T. Sharshar, M. M. Hessien, O. M. Hemeda, ‘Effect of γ-rays
irradiation on Mn-Ni ferrites: structure, magnetic properties and positron
annihilation studies’, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Rev. B, (2013) (Accepted
Manuscript).
46. R. D. Waldron, ‘Infrared Spectra of Ferrites’, Phys. Rev., 99 (1955)
1727 – 1735.
Chapter 1
1.29
47. F. Meyer, R. Hempelmann, S. Mathur, M. Veith, ‘Microemulsion mediated
sol – gel synthesis of nano-scaled MAl2O4 (M = Co, Ni, Cu) spinels from
single-source hetero bimetallic alkoxide precursors’, J. Mater. Chem., 9 (1999)
1755 – 1763.
48. W. Chang, F. Cosandey, H. Hahn, ‘Electron microscopy studies of phase
transformations in nanostructured Yttrium Oxide’, Nanostruct. Mater., 2 (1)
(1993) 29 – 35.
49. G A Sawatzky, F van Der Woude, A H Morrish, ‘Cation Distributions in
Octahedral and Tetrahedral Sites of the Ferrimagnetic Spinel CoFe2O4’,
J. Appl. Phys., 39 (2) (1968) 1204 – 1205.
50. B. S. Trivedi, R. G. Kulkarni, ‘Mossbauer and Magnetization study of cobalt
ferrite aluminates’, Solid State Commu., 86 (5) (1993) 327 – 331.
51. E. Pervaiz, I. H. Gul, ‘Enhancement of electrical properties due to
Cr3+ substitution in Co-ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by two chemical
techniques’, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 324 (22) (2012) 3695 – 3703.
52. S. S. Manoharan, K. C. Patil, ‘Combustion synthesis of metal chromite
powders’, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75 (4) (1992) 1012 – 1015.
53. I. Kim, Y. S. Oh, Y. Liu, S. H. Chun, J – S. Lee, K – T. Ko, J – H Park, J – H
Chung, K. H. Kim, ‘Electric polarization enhancement in
multiferroicCoCr2O4 crystals with Cr-site mixing’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 94
(2009) 042505 – 1 – 3.
54. C. Suchomski, C. Reitz, K. Brezesinski, C. T. de souse, M. Rohnke, K-I
Iimura, J. P. E. de Arauje, T. Brezesinski, ‘Structural, Optical, and Magnetic
Properties of Highly Ordered Mesoporous MCr2O4 and MCr2–xFexO4 (M = Co,
Zn) Spinel Thin Films with Uniform 15 nm Diameter Pores and Tunable
Nanocrystalline Domain Sizes’, Chem. Mater. 24 (2011) 155 – 165.
55. K. Krieble, C. C. H. Lo, Y. Melikhov, J. E. Snyder, ‘Investigation of Cr
substitution in Co ferrite(CoCrxFe2−xO4) using Mossbauer spectroscopy’, J.
Appl. Phys., 99 (8) (2006) 08M912 – 1 – 3.
56. G. Lawes, B. Melot, K. Page, C. Ederer, M. A. Hayward, Th. Proffen,
R. Sheshadri, ‘Dielectric anomalies and spiral magnetic order in CoCr2O4’,
Phys. Rev. B, 74 (2) (2006) 024413 – 024418.
Chapter 1
1.30
57. Kunal B. Modi, Nimish H. Vasoya, Vinay K. Lakhani, Tushar K. Pathak,
P. M. G. Nambissan, ‘Crystal Defects and Cation Redistribution Study on
Nanocrystalline Cobalt-Ferri-Chromites by Positron Annihilation
Spectroscopy’, Int. J. Spectro., 2013 (2013) 11 pages.
58. J. P. Chen, C. M. Sorensen, K. J. Klabunde, G. C. Hadjipanayi, E. Devlin
A. Kostickas, ‘Size-dependent magnetic properties of MnFe2O4 fine particles
synthesized by coprecipitation’, Phys. Rev. B, 54 (1996) 9288 – 9296.
59. T. K. Pathak, N. H. Vasoya, V. K. Lakhani, K. B. Modi, ‘Structural and
magnetic phase evolution study on needle-shaped nanoparticles of magnesium
ferrite’, Ceram. Int., 36 (1) (2010) 275 – 281.