Date post: | 27-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kerry-douglas |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 1 times |
CESIE IDEAS+ Workshop 2014 Brussels, 14 February 2014
Erasmus+Knowledge/Sector Skills AlliancesLessons learnt and perspectives
Holger Bienzle
www.bridgestoeurope.com
KA 2: New types of projects
Sector Skills Alliances
Knowledge Alliances
Strategic Partn
erships
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Key Activity 2: Cooperation
Development of innnovation and transfer of good practice
European aded value through transnational cooperation
Improvement of quality in education through innovative approaches
Development and dissemination of sustainable project results
Enhancement of key competences
Entrepreneurship and employability
Equal opportunities
Participation of people with special needs
Cooperation with third countries in higher education
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Knowledge Alliances
Strengthening Europe's innovation capacity and fostering
innovation in higher education, business and the broader socio-economic environment by
Developing new, innovative and multidisciplinary approaches to teaching and learning;
Stimulating entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial skills of higher education teaching staff and enterprise staff;
Facilitating the exchange, flow and co-creation of knowledge
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Boosting innovation
Jointly developing and implementing new learning and teaching methods (like new multidisciplinary curricula, learner-centred and real problem-based teaching and learning);
Organising continuing educational programmes and activities with and within companies;
Jointly developing solutions for challenging issues, product and process innovation (students, professors and practitioners together).
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Developing entrepreneurship
Creating schemes of transversal skills learning and application throughout higher education programmes developed in cooperation with enterprises aiming at strengthening employability, creativity and new professional paths;
Introducing entrepreneurship education in any discipline to provide students, researchers, staff and educators with the knowledge, skills and motivation to engage in entrepreneurial activities in a variety of settings;
Opening up new learning opportunities through the practical application of entrepreneurial skills, which can involve and/or lead to the commercialisation of new services, products and prototypes, to the creation of start-ups and spin-offs
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Exchange of knowledge
Study field related activities in enterprises which are fully embedded in the curriculum, recognised and credited;
Set-ups to trial and test innovative measures;
Exchanges of students, researchers, teaching staff and company staff for a limited period;
Involvement of company staff in teaching and research
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Essentials
Innovation in higher education and innovation through higher education in enterprises
Sustainability of university-business cooperation; reliable relations between partners
Impact beyond the project's lifetime and beyond the organisations involved in the Alliance
Proper ex-ante needs analysis
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Eligible organisations
Any public or private organisation established in a Programme Country or in any Partner Country of the world:
a higher education institution;
a public or private, small, medium or large enterprise (including social enterprises);
a research institute;
a public body at local, regional or national level;
an organisation active in the field of education, training and youth;
an intermediary or association which represents education, training or youth organisations;
an intermediary or association which represents enterprises;
an accreditation, certification or qualification body
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Corner stones
Duration: 2-3 years
Partnership: at least 6 organisations from 3 Programme Countries
Funding: up to 700.000 € (2 years), 1.000.000 € (3 years)
Budget different form Strategic Partnerships: just three cost categories:o Implementation supporto Travelo Subsistence
Submission to EACEA (centralized action)
Deadline: 3 April, 12:00 mid-day
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Sector Skills Alliances
Tackling skills gaps, enhancing the responsiveness of initial and continuing VET systems to sector-specific labour market needs and demand for new skills with regard to or more occupational profiles by
Modernising VET and exploiting its potential to drive economic development and innovation, notably at local and regional levels, increasing the competitiveness of the sectors concerned;
Strengthening the exchange of knowledge and practice between VET institutions and the labour market integrating work-based learning;
Facilitating labour mobility, mutual trust and increased recognition of qualifications at European level within the sectors concerned
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Characteristics
Design and delivery of joint vocational training programmes and teaching and training methodologies
Particular focus on work-based learning Application of the EU wide recognition tools (EQR, ECVET)
in the following sectors:
Textile/Clothing/Leather (European Skills Council) Commerce (European Skills Council)
Advanced Manufacturing; Information and Communication Technologies; Environmental technologies (Eco-Innovation); Cultural and Creative sectors
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Defining skills and training needs
When needed, gathering and interpreting evidence of skills needs on the labour market in a given economic sector, drawing on the EU Skills Panorama and, where relevant, the work of European Sector Skills Councils;
Identifying needs in terms of training provision, drawing on, where available, the occupational profiles of the classification of European Skills, Competences, Qualifications and Occupations
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Designing joint curricula
Designing EU sector-specific curricula, VET programmes and possibly qualification standards related to common skills needs common in the sector and/or to a European occupational profile, drawing, where available, on ESCO;
Integrating skills or occupational profiles into curriculum design, VET programmes and possibly qualification standards;
The activities described above should apply the learning outcomes approach (e.g. EQF, ECVET, etc.) and be underpinned by quality assurance principles (e.g. EQAVET);
Integrating innovative approaches to teaching and learning, notably through more strategic and integrated use of ICTs and open educational resources (OER), as well as including opportunities to apply knowledge in practical projects/"real life" workplace situations and to develop entrepreneurial mind-sets.
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Delivering joint curricula
Delivering EU sector-specific curricula that have been adapted or newly created following the analysis and forecasts of labour market needs for a given occupational profile;
Implementing innovative VET teaching and learning methods to respond to evolving skills and/or specific target public within a given economic sector (e.g. ICT-based content, services and methods, education in the workplace environment, etc.);
Facilitating recognition and certification of the respective learning outcomes by implementing (ECVET) principles, the quality assurance framework in VET (EQAVET) and possibly referencing respective qualifications to EU frameworks (depending on the form of the NQF) or any other relevant European tools in the sector concerned.
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Essentials
Innovation in VET, in different economic sectors and related to occupational profiles (where available ESCO)
Impact beyond the project's lifetime and beyond the organisations involved in the Alliance
Changes have to be measurable
Results should feed back into European Skills Councils
Partners representative in the sector
European outreach
Skills needs based on research evidence
System relevance of results, mainstreaming
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Eligible organisations
Any public or private organisation established in a Programme Country or in any Partner Country of the world: a vocational education institute/school; a VET centre; an inter-company training centre; a public or private, small, medium or large enterprise (incl. social enterprises); a public VET authority at local, regional or national level; a higher education institution providing VET; a social partner or other representative of working life, including chambers of
commerce, industry, craft/professional associations and trade unions; an intermediary or association which represents VET organsiations; a research institute; a cultural and/or creative body; a body providing career guidance, professional counselling &information services; a body responsible for recognition; an accreditation, certification or qualification body.
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Corner stones
Duration: 2-3 years
Partnership: at least 9 organisations from 3 Programme Countries
At least 1 partner from each category:
o Public or private VET povider
o Public or private entity representatove in the sector
o Public or private entity with regulatory function for VET
Funding: up to 700.000 € (2 years), 1.000.000 € (3 years)
Budget different from Strategic Partnerships: just three cost categories:o Implementation supporto Travelo Subsistence
Submission to EACEA (centralized action)
Deadline: 3 April, 12:00 mid-day
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Erasmus+: Where to go?
Sector Skills Alliances
Strategicpartnerships
Knowledge Alliances
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Erasmus+: Where to go?
Development, transfer & dissemination of inno-vation & good practices
Duration: 2-3 years
Funding: up to 150.00 € / year
Decentralised action
Sector Skills Alliances
Strategicpartnerships
Knowledge Alliances
Exchange & co-creation of knowledge byhigher education & businesses
Duration: 2-3 years
Funding: up to 1.000.000 €Centralised action
Addressing identified sectoral skills gaps
Duration: 2-3 years
Funding: up to 1.000.000 €Centralised action
Most promising funding line in Erasmus+
Development of new educational products
Transfer of good practice to new countries
Tricky budgeting
Extremely competitive
Very high expectations
Slow start: only few projects in 2014
High preparation effort
Involvement of „big“ players
Sustainability and system relevance
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Lessons learnt and perspectives
LLP was a highly competitive funding programme:Funding rate in centralized actions 10-15 %
Erasmus + will be at least as competitiveMaybe not in all actions from the start?!?
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Success factor: Good proposal
„Round“ proposal
Red thread
Consistency: argumentation, use of key terms, workplan, budget
Readability (in spite of adverse application forms !)
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Success factor: Strategic approach
Contribution to o Overarching EU policies
(Europe 2020)o Programme aimso Priorities of Call for Proposals
and of sub-actions
Explicit references throughout the proposal (mantra)
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Success factor: Innovation
Innovation is crucial
But: There is no fresh snow. (Es gibt keinen Neuschnee.)“ (Kurt Tucholsky)
Innovation does not necessarily mean to invent something completely new but can also occur when an educational approach that has proved to be good practice is adapted, modified or further developed according to the needs of:
o A different thematic field of learning
o Another educational sector
o A new target group
o Other European countries
Consult ADAM & EVE
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Success factor: Partnership
Comprehensible criteria for the selection of the partners acccording to competence, geographical spread etc.
Outreach / access to the target groups
Balanced and appropriate distribution of tasks
Balanced budget distribution, in line with work plan
Imbalances are explicitly described/justified
Involvement of “system players”, such as chambers, social services, labour services, unions, ministries etc.
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Success factor: Workplan
Consistent and comprehensible – Red Thread Realistic and fit for action Roles and responsibilities are divided and understood Clear and measurable objectives External and internal evaluation are planned Dissemination and exploitation
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Success factor: Impact
Measurability: figures of participants, number of courses, involved organizations, etc.
Ambitious but realistic
Clear plans for the future
In Erasmus + (as usual ) more emphasis on added value, dissemination and exploitation, impact: system relevance !
Impact power of consortium: system players
www.bridgestoeurope.com
Thank you for your attention!