Date post: | 12-May-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | my-own-sweet-home |
View: | 538 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Chapter 15Chapter 15Government and
Industry: Challenges and
Opportunities for Today's Managers
Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today’s Decision
Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government and Industry
• The Rationale for Government Involvement in a Market Economy
• Doing Business with the U.S. Government
• Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Functions of Government in a Market Economy
• Provide legal and social framework
• Redistribution of income and wealth
• Regulation of natural monopolies
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Functions of Government in a Market Economy
• Provide for a competitive framework
• Reallocation of resources in the presence of externalities
• Stabilization of the aggregate economy
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Competitive Framework: Antitrust Laws
Sherman Anti-Trust ActClayton ActFederal Trade Commission Act
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
The purpose of antitrust laws
Two schools of thought
1. Economic efficiency
2. Protection of small independent firms
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Dealing with market externalities
Under perfect competition:
• resources are efficiently allocated
• social welfare is maximized
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Dealing with market externalities
However, if all costs are not included in the price or all costs are not compensated, market failure results.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
A benefit externality (positive externality) arises if certain benefits of the production or consumption of a good or service accrue to third parties.
Producers cannot appropriate all the revenue so too little may be produced.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
A cost externality (negative externality) arises if some of the costs of production or consumption of a good or service are borne by third parties.
The product’s price will be lower than if it had been fully costed and too much of the product will be produced.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Benefit externality• Private garden• Information• Innovations
Cost externality• Pollution
Examples
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
MCp = marginal production cost
MCpol = marginal pollution cost
MCs = marginal social cost
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
P1 = market price
Popt = socially optimal price
Q1 = market clearing quantity
Qopt = socially optimal quantity
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Socially optimal price occurs where the price of the product equals the marginal social cost.
At this point, less pollution will be produced than under competitive conditions. (Qopt < Q1)
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
How can the optimal equilibrium be attained?
• Government can restrict production to Qopt.
• Government can impose a pollution tax equal to MCpol.
• Government can set maximum pollution levels for the industry then sell (tradable) pollution licenses.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Coase Theorem: The idea that government intervention to eliminate the effect of externalities is not necessary if property rights are correctly and clearly defined.
If property rights (i.e. pollution permits) are assigned, bargaining between the parties involved would result in an optimal solution.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Problems with Coasian bargaining
• Normative issues
• Transaction costs
• Unfair bargaining
• Incomplete information
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Stabilization of the Aggregate Economy
• Monetary Policy: the use of the money supply and interest rates by the Federal Reserve System to influence the macroeconomy
• Fiscal Policy: the use of taxes and government spending to influence the macroeconomy
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Monetary Policy
The primary goals of monetary policy are to achieve a certain level of economic activity and price level.
Recently monetary policy has involved influencing the Federal Funds rate.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
The Federal Funds rate is the interest rate at which banks are able to borrow funds from other banks.
The Federal Open Market Committee determines whether the Federal Funds rate target should be changed.
Monetary Policy
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
The Fed may have to engage in open market operations to bring the rate to its desired (target) level. Open market operations involves buying and selling government securities in the market in order to increase or decrease the money supply, thus influencing interest rates.
Monetary Policy
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Fiscal Policy
Fiscal Policy is designed to achieve macroeconomic goals relating to output and employment.
By manipulating receipts and expenditures, a surplus or deficit is created.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
To stimulate the economy, the government will:
• decrease taxes • increase expenditures,
which shifts the federal budget toward deficit.
Fiscal Policy
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Involvement in a Market Economy
Policy Lags
• Recognition
• Implementation
• Operational
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Doing Business with the U.S. Government
Monopsony: A market in which there is only one buyer.
The government procurement office is often cited as a good example of a monopsony.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Doing Business with the U.S. Government
What the U.S. government buys is influenced by:
• Government strategic plans• Budget and program input from federal
departments• Priorities set by the President• Availability of appropriated funds• Congressionally mandated requirements• Surplus/deficit conditions• Politics
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Doing Business with the U.S. Government
Government acquisition is controlled by:
• Armed Services Procurement Act
• Federal Property and Administrative Act
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Doing Business with the U.S. Government
• Competition requirements
• Profit restrictions• Audits
• Bid protest rules• Accounting
requirements• Socioeconomic
Programs
Companies doing business with the government must comply with:
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
From the late 1970’s through the 1990’s the government eliminated most regulatory control in the following industries:
• Telecommunications
• Electric and gas utilities
• Airlines
• Commercial banks
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
Deregulation has resulted in more competitive environment.
Many companies have sought to merge with or acquire other companies in order to survive and grow.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
The basic motivation for mergers is to increase the value of the combined firms.
VA+B > (VA + VB)
V = total market value
A & B = companies involved
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
Incentives to Merge
1. Synergies in production
• Revenue enhancements
• Operating economies
• Financial economies
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
2. Improved management
The merger may create an opportunity for improving the overall management level by eliminating poor managers.
Incentives to Merge
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
3. Tax consequences
The merger may reduce the tax bill of the two combined companies.
Incentives to Merge
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
4. Managerial power
A merger may occur when the acquiring company’s managers are seeking to increase their span of authority.
Incentives to Merge
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
5. Diversification
Mergers among unrelated firms was said to decrease the variability of sales and earnings and thus benefit stockholders.
Incentives to Merge
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
6. Market power
Mergers may decrease competition in an industry, thus leading to higher profits for the remaining firms.
Incentives to Merge
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
Stockholders of the target firm gain substantially.
Stockholders of the acquiring firm gain very little.
Overall increase in value of combined firms.
2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Managerial Economics, 4/e Keat/Young
Government Deregulation, Mergers, and Acquisitions
Evidence regarding profitability of merged firms is mixed.
Merger activity does not appear to have increased the level of industry concentration.
There appears to be no decrease in research and development of merged firms.