Chapter – 1
Introduction
1.1 Concept and Meaning
Education is the basic tool for the development of an individual. Every
individual is linked to the society and society is linked with the country.
Therefore the development of manpower resource in the education sector has
key role to play in the development of a nation [18]. Education and training
are the basic and primary systems by which the trained human assets of a
nation are developed and preserved. Higher education, particularly technical
and management education, has a direct link with the growth in the economy
of a country.
The new era of human resource development (HRD) has become very vibrant
and dynamic and is speaking in terms of technological development and
management system, the demand for qualified engineers and managers is
increasing globally. In response to this, the demand for Engineering and
Management institutes is increasing in India. These institutions are coming up
with a challenge to enhancing the learning about the latest technology and new
management techniques by the students, and to create an environment for
preparing graduates with competitive excellence for an ever-changing future.
Hence, a developmental climate, which not only fosters innovation and
creativity, but also promotes a high level of motivation and commitment is
highly desirable in these institutes. Engineering and management institutes
both in government and the private sector are helping society by providing
opportunities to get the technical and professional education by those students
who are willing to become an Engineer or Manager. Presently, more than 3500
engineering and 2500 management colleges (Source: AICTE) are providing
engineering and management education in India, Out of which 213 are
Engineering Institute and 195 are Management institutes (Source: DTE, MP),
is in Madhya Pradesh.
Employees are considered to be the most important and valuable asset to
assure the efficient and effective management of these institutes. Human
resource development, therefore, plays a vital and essential role in the
development and maintenance of employees of educational institutions.
‘Human resource development is a continuous process to ensure the
development of employee’s competencies, dynamism, motivation and
effectiveness in a systematic and planned way. Hence, HRD is concerned with
the development of Human resource and optimum utilization of existing
human capabilities, i.e. intellectual, entrepreneurial and creation of new ones
in an organization’ [18].
‘Human Resource Development (HRD) is an important and very attention
receiving discipline of present time. It is a relatively young academic
discipline, but an old and well-established field of practice [83]. Researchers
have developed new theories and conceptual frameworks that address a broad
range of phenomena of interest to the HRD profession’ [85]. The public as
well as private sector including education, health, family welfare, Police,
defense service industry, etc. have initiated HRD systems and mechanisms for
the development of their employees as well as at organization. The scholars,
professionals and executives have also taken much interest in this regard to
propagate HRD values and its relevance in the organization.
“Management system has accepted the role of human resources as the key
factor for success in a highly competitive environment. It is the human
resource available within the company which identifies the advantage,
develops the necessary skills to refine the advantage and deliver the goods and
services needed to sustain the advantage”[15]. ‘HRD significantly influences
the local and national economy through the development of workforce skills
and intellectual capital’ [42]
Definition of HRD
Harbison and Myers offered the first definition of HRD in 1964. This
definition is very broad in perspective, as it elaborates HRD in relation to
culture, the economy and social and political contexts rather than individuals
and organizations. They defined HRD as:
“HRD is the process of increasing the knowledge, the skills, and the capacities
of all the people, in a society. In economic terms, it could be described as the
accumulation of human capital and its effective investment in the development
of an economy. In political terms, HRD prepares people for adult participation
in the political process, particularly as citizens in a democracy. From the social
and cultural points of view, the development of human resources helps to
people lead fuller and richer lives, less bound to tradition. In short, the
processes of HRD unlock the door to modernization,”[25].
Researchers have tried to define HRD in a global perspective. A few
definitions from an organizational point of view are given here:
“A series of organized activities conducted within a specified time and
designed to produce behavioral change” (by Nadler and Nadler 1970).
HRD as one of the more moral management functions, which is intended to
help people to learn and develop [23].
Management and organizational writers have noted, that the field of HRD has
expanded beyond training and development to include a strong connection to
corporate strategy, individual responsibility for learning, extension into team
learning, incorporation of career development, an emphasis on internal
consultancy, organizational learning and knowledge management and the
nurturing of the intellectual capital of an enterprise [48].
HRD is a process of developing and unleashing expertise for the purpose of
improving individual, team, work processes and organizational system
performance. HRD along with education and training also involves activities
related to empowerment, awareness raising, skill enhancement, team building,
community mobilization and development, organization development,
entrepreneurship development, sensitization and conscientisation, human
resources planning and policies [33].
HRD is the process of human capital formation. The transformation process
consists of acquiring, developing, allocation, conserving, utilizing, evaluating
and rewarding people. This way the importance of Human Resource
Development in cooperatives has been focused.(Patil, Sunil, Subhash, 2010).
HRD in India (Reproduced from the book on the future of HRD by T. V. Rao, MacMillan India
[96]):
HRD has come to a stage where it can be treated as a Profession in India. The
first dedicated department started in India about 25 years ago at L&T, A
Center for HRD was started at XLRI seven years later, A National HRD
Network was formed in the year 1985 and has sustained itself with good work
since then, an Academy of HRD started in 1990, over fifty books have
appeared in the last two decades on HRD, a few institutions have started
Master’s in HRD programs, a Doctoral program is in place, and the body of
knowledge in this field is growing.
In spite these developments, judged against the criteria needed to be called a
profession and as compared to the development of this profession abroad, it
may be concluded that the body of knowledge passed on in schools that
prepare HRD professionals lacks basic understanding of HRD. The basics are
neither taught nor followed by the professionals. There is no code of conduct,
ethics and values and the professional bodies have shied away from
formulating norm, values, certification requirements etc.. There is no licensing
mechanism to practice and mentorship lacking except at an informal level.
Judged against these criteria, it is concluded that HRD has remained at best as
an occupation or a preoccupation of a few it has a long way to go. The next
steps to be taken in India to make HRD a strong Profession are presented [96].
It is more than two decades the term Human Resource development became
popular in the country. It was in 1975 a decision to start a dedicated
Department to promote the Human Resources Development was initiated in
India at Larsen & Toubro Limited. Pareek and Rao (1975) outlined a
philosophy for the new HRD system. They outlined 14 principles to be kept in
mind in designing the HRD System. These principles deal with both the
purpose of HRD systems and the process of their implementation. Some of
these principles include:
a. HRD systems should help the company to increase, enabling
capabilities. The capabilities outlined in their report include:
development of human resources in all aspects, organizational health,
improvements in problem solving capabilities, diagnostic skills,
capabilities to support all the other systems in the company, etc..
b. HRD systems should help individuals to recognize their potential and
help them to contribute their best various organizational roles they are
expected to perform.
c. HRD systems should help maximize individual autonomy through
increased responsibility;
d. HRD systems should facilitate decentralization through delegation and
shared responsibility;
e. HRD systems should facilitate participative decision making
f. HRD systems should attempt to balance the current organizational
culture along with changing the culture, there should be a continuous
review and renewal of the function [54].
Thereafter L&T accepted these recommendations in full and started
implementing. The State Bank of India the single largest Indian Bank and its
associates have decided to use the Integrated HRD systems approach and
decided to create the new HRD department. Since then, by mid-eighties a
large number of organizations in India have established HRD departments. By
mid-eighties HR has become an accepted role and most organizations have
changed their personnel, training and other related functions to HRD. Some
have differentiated Human Resource Development from Human Resources
Department and some did not.
However, HRD has come to mean new expectations, new body of knowledge
and new function. Establishment of the Centre for HRD at XLRI; the
formation of the National HRD Network in 1985; the starting of the Academy
of HRD in 1990; Starting of Diploma Programs in HRD; starting the
Symbiosis Centre for Management and HRD; starting of the Doctoral Program
in HRD jointly by AHRD and XLRI etc. are highlights of HRD in India. All
these have added to the expectations of CEOs, line managers and HR
managers from HR development managers [96].
Human Resource Development (HRD) is a process by which the employees of
an organization are helped in a continuous, planned way, to: 1) Acquire or
sharpen capabilities required to perform various functions associated with
their present or expected future roles, 2) Develop their general cap-abilities as
individuals and discover and exploit their potentials for their own and/or
organizational development purposes, and 3) Develop an organizational
culture in which Supervisor - subordinate relationships, teamwork, and
collaboration among sub-units are strong and contribute to the professional
well-being, motivation, and pride of employees [62].
HRD Culture
The culture provides the energy needed to function well by ensuring as it were
a proper circulation of the blood through all the organs. The culture also acts
as as oxygen in the case of emergency. The HRD culture is one that results
from the beliefs of the top management initially and subsequently from the
HRD system and practices. It deserves to be studied and assessed
independently for its importance and independent standing. The organizational
culture plays a significant role in making organization get the best out of
themselves Abraham’s (1989) study has established clearly the linkage
between the HRD climate and organizational performance in financial terms.
Even if the climate does not have the direct linkage at a given point of time,
logically it makes sense to have a good HRD climate for the benefit of the
organization [66].
T.V. Rao (1999) [66] further explains human resource development deals with
competence building, culture building and commitment building. Competency
and commitment can be built on a continuous basis in a certain type of culture.
Hence creating a culture becomes important in any organization. A good HRD
culture should have the following characteristics:
a. It should be learning culture.
b. It should facilitate the identification of new competencies of people on
a continuous basis.
c. It should facilitate bringing out the hidden potential and new talent of
people.
d. It should help in developing new competencies.
e. It should have inbuilt motivational value.
f. It should enable people to take initiative and experiment.
g. It should bring joy and satisfaction in work.
h. It should enhance creativity and problem solving capabilities of people.
i. It should create team spirit and morale.
j. It should enhance the action orientation of individuals, dyads and
Team.
Such a culture has been termed as OCTAPACE is an acronym for openness,
collaboration, trust, authenticity, pro action, autonomy, confrontation and
experimentation. He further elaborates characteristics of the above terms in
detail as below:
HRD Climate
Human Resource Development climate is not new to India. It is evident that
India had a system of training and development of the personnel even some
4000 to 5000 years back through various institutions and systems such as
Ashramav, Yavastha, Purusharthas, joint family, etc. These systems slowly
disappeared from India due to foreign invasions and alien rule for several
centuries [8]
An optimal level of development climate is essential for facilitating HRD
activities. This can be characterized by the tendencies such as treating
employees as the most important resources, perceiving that developing
employees is the job of every manager, believing in the capability of
employees, communicating openly, encouraging risk taking and
experimentation, making efforts to help employees recognize their strengths
and weaknesses, creating a general climate of trust, collaboration and
autonomy, supportive personnel policies, and supportive HRD practices. HRD
Climate is an integral part of organizational climate. It is the perception the
employee can have on the development environment of an organization [63].
a. According to T.V. Rao (1999) [66] the developmental climate can be
observed in organization consisting of the following tendencies:
b. A tendency at all levels starting from the top management to the lowest
level to treat the people as the most important resources.
c. A perception, that developing the competencies in the employees is the
job of every manager/ supervisor.
d. Faith in capabilities of employees to change and acquire new
competencies at any stage of life.
e. A tendency to be open communication and discussion rather than being
secretive
f. A tendency to encourage risk taking.
g. A tendency to help employees recognize their strengths and
weaknesses through feedback.
h. A general climate of trust.
i. A tendency on the part of employees to be generally helpful to each
other and collaborate
j. Team spirit
k. A tendency to discourage favoritism and biases
l. Supportive personnel policies
Development oriented appraisal, reward management, potential development,
job rotation and career planning [66]
Patre Smruti, Gupta Rashmi (2011) [99] tried to explain in their study titled
“A Study of the Perceptions of Management Institute Faculty towards HRD
Culture, with Reference to Nagpur City” that's how an organization can
improve the HRD climate prevailing in the organization in following steps:
Developing HRD Climate in an Organization
Top to Bottom Effort
An organization is considered to be a complete organization after including
the top authority to the bottom line of workers. And whenever we talk about
development at the organizational level, effort is needed from the top to
bottom level. The top authority should not think that their task is to only take
decisions, but they should also emphasize on proper implementation of the
decisions by adopting various controlling techniques. Bottom level workers
should have a loyal mindset towards their organization, should work with
dedication, and should develop a sense of belongingness towards the
organization.
Motivator Role of Manager and Supervisor
To prepare a good HRD climate, the managers and the supervisors are the key
players. Managers and supervisors have to develop the competencies of the
employees by updating themselves and sharing their expertise and experience
with the employees.
Faith in Employees
In the process of developing a good HRD climate, the employer should have
faith in employees’ capabilities—amount invested should be based on the
development of employees. Top management should trust that the employees
will work for the well-being of the organization and the society.
Free Expression of Feelings
Clear communication from the top management to the employees and vice
versa should exist in the organization. Clear communication helps to establish
a good HRD climate.
Feedback
Regular feedback is a must to know the drawbacks in the system. This also
helps to gain the confidence of the employees who develop trust in the
management and express their opinion freely. Feedback will remove
weaknesses and establish a good HRD climate.
Helpful Nature of Employees
Whenever we talk about 100% effort, we have to talk about the employees’
effort too. Employees should help the management and their colleagues. They
should always be ready to help the customers too.
Supportive Personnel Management
Personnel policies of the organization should motivate employees to
contribute more on their part. Top management’s philosophy should be clear
towards human resource and its well being to encourage the employees.
Motivating Employees
Employees should be motivated to take decisions. This concept is risky, but
gradually brings expertise in the employees to handle similar situations in
future. It also develops confidence in the employees. The organization can
utilize and develop employees more by assigning risky tasks.
Discouraging Stereotypes and Favoritism
The management needs to avoid those practices which lead to favoritism.
Management and managers need to give equal importance to all. Those who
perform well needed to be appreciated and those who do not perform well
needed to be guided. Any kind of partiality does not aid in the establishment
of good HRD Climate.
Team Spirit
There must be a feeling of belonging ness among the employees, and also
willingness to work as a team.
Components of HRD Climate
The organizational climate consists of the following components:
Organizational Structure
An organization’s structure is actually a ‘snapshot’ of a work process, frozen
in time so that it can be viewed. The structure enables the people’s energy to
be focused towards process and goal achievement. An employee must have a
clear definition of not only the work structure, but also his role in organizing
the work. Ambiguity in the structure and role does not help in establishing a
good HRD climate.
Organizational Culture
Organizational culture is the pattern of beliefs, knowledge, attitudes, and
customs that exist within an organization. Organizational culture may result in
part from senior management's beliefs or from the beliefs of employees.
Organizational culture can be supportive or unsupportive, positive or negative.
It can affect the ability or willingness of employees to adapt or perform well
within the organization.
HR Processes
The HR system of an organization should be comprehensive enough to take
care of employees from the time they join till the time they leave. Their
demands must not be ignored, but a feeling of belonging ness should be
created. The process should be very clear and impartial so that employees
have faith in the organization. From recruitment to retirement, the whole
process should be according to the employees’ expectation and ability of the
employer [99].
An organization that has a better HRD climate and processes is likely to be
more effective that an organization which does not have [64].
According to T.V. Rao (1999) [66] HRD Climate constitutes of General
Climate, HRD Mechanisms and OCTAPAC Culture. General Climate
highlights the extent to which the management of an organization has a sincere
intention, determined will and takes supportive actions for developing its
manpower. HRD Mechanism constitutes subsystems like performance
management, training and development, potential appraisal, career planning
and development, reward management, quality of work life, self-renewal
mechanisms etc. The OCTAPAC (Openness, Confrontation, Trust,
Autonomy, Pro action, Authenticity and Collaboration)culture underlines an
organizational culture, having elements like open and frank communication
system, an environment of trust, opportunities to take decision and be
innovative, a proactive attitude towards development by the employees and
line managers, an authentic approach towards developmental issues, and
positive attitude for settling matters of dispute and grievances forthrightly with
positive interaction. T.V. Rao explained the OCTAPAC attributes for a
developmental HRD climate in detail asunder:
Openness
Employees are free to express their ideas. They are comfortable to talk to any
employees and their employers about their views and problems. Management
adopts open door policy to maintain openness in the environment within. An
organization should evaluate their ideas properly and carefully and be ready to
take risks. Because, as business policy says ‘more, risk more return’ and ’no
risk no return’. The top managers leave their doors open, so that any of their
subordinates also can communicate with them. Managers encourage their
employees to discuss their problems face to face. Openness also implies
spatial openness. It includes accessibility of computers or internet. Offices
without walls also symbol of promoting openness within the organization. If
an organization includes openness in its climate, then the atmosphere of the
organization becomes comfortable and stress free because of that atmosphere
the top management tries to solve the problems immediately. As employees
feel comfortable to discuss their ideas as well as problems with their
employees, so the probability of grievance or dissatisfaction within the
employees becomes very low.
General cause of grievance in the organizations is a communication gap
between employees and employers. Openness results in greater clarity of
objectives and free interaction among employees. The organization includes
openness, but if it is against risk taking, then too one can say climate of that
organization is not so good. Because if employees give idea to generate more
profit and that idea is genuinely strong, but the organization does not want to
take the risk, then those ideas are having no values. If we don’t implement our
planning then what is the need of it. Because of the negligence of their views
and suggestions employees may feel dissatisfaction and this can create
grievance within the employees. So, to make organizational climate more
effective and efficient one should adopt openness within the organization and
the organization must be ready to take risks. Openness in organizational
climate motivates open communication, feedback, and discussion about any
matter of importance to an employee.
Confrontation
Confrontation is about face to face meeting of members where they can
express their ideas without fear. Some organizations boost confrontation so
that new ideas and new concepts can come out that can contribute to
organizational development. Confrontation means problems brought in front
of people rather than avoiding them. Employees face the problem together and
try to find a solution. An organization encourages people to recognize a
problem and bring it to the people concerned to solve it. It is the deeper
analysis of interpersonal problems.
Trust
Trust is a feeling which develops slowly. It is also related to openness. The
openness of an atmosphere can help to build trust in the mind of employees. It
also includes maintaining the confidentiality of information shared by others,
so that nobody can misuse it. Trust within the employees to the management
and management’s trust of employees result, a high level of empathy,
coordination among employees, friendly and disciplined atmosphere and
higher productivity. Trusty atmosphere also reduces stress as well as politics
among employees.
Authenticity
Authenticity is the willingness of a person to acknowledge the feelings and
make coordination between what he says and does. This value is important for
the development of a matured culture within the organization. Authenticity is
closer to openness. The result of authenticity brings openness in the climate of
the organization. If a person is authentic or genuine in his life it becomes very
easy to predict his behavior.
Pro-activity
Employees take active initiative for any change and anticipate future
development. In pro- activity employees take initiative and plan in advance
and take preventive action. Pro-activity also includes positive behavior. For
example, if an employee behaves very badly to another employee or shouts at
him, there could be two approaches of the other person. The first one could be
that the employee may blast on him and the second approach could be that the
person may say calmly that they will discuss on this matter later on with a cool
mind. This is called pro-activity or pro-action. Pro-activity gives initiative to a
person to start a new process or a new pattern of behavior.
Autonomy
Autonomy refers to freedom or independence to use power without any fear. It
means giving freedom to the employee to enjoy the power of a position, but
within certain limits set by the organization. Management respects the
employee’s feelings and encourages them to take the responsibility. Autonomy
increases with the responsibility of a person. The outcome of autonomy is the
development of mutual respect between employees and employers and
confidence among employees. Effective delegation can bring proper autonomy
in the organizational climate.
Collaboration
It depicts that people work together and use one another’s skill to achieve a
common goal. In solving any problem they take help of other people to find
out a better alternative. On the basis of that they plan and prepare strategies
and implement them together. It encourages employees to help others and ask
for help from others. It develops team spirit and manages a friendly and open
climate in the organization. It increases productivity of individual as well as
the organization; motivate joint decision and participative approach, proper
utilization of resources and better quality of products and services.
Research studies have shown that a conducive HRD Climate affects
performance of the organization positively and enhances organizational
commitment as well as job involvement and performance. HRD Climate
affects individual performance in three ways:
a. By defining the stimuli that confront the individual.
b. By placing constraints on the individual ‟s freedom of choice and
c. By providing a source of reward and punishment (B. Patanayak, 1998)
[57].
A congenial HRD Climate helps to boost employee morale and creates
motivated and competent employees who are propelled by Organizational
commitment and sensitivity towards organizational needs. The role of the HR
department becomes pivotal in designing, developing and implementing
effective policies, strategies and procedures of HRD mechanisms which help
in creating positive perceptions in employees, Thereby enhancing
organizational commitment. Studies have positively linked ten dimensions of
HRD climate, Such as participation, succession planning, counseling,
appraisal, training, organizational development, human resource information
system, career planning, reward and welfare, job enrichment towards
enhancing organizational commitment [59]. There is a significant relationship
between Job Satisfaction and HRD Climate and any positive change in HRD
Climate and its components will bring about positive changes in Job
Satisfaction which in turn will impact the Organizational Performance in a
positive manner. The various elements of an HRD Climate if exist to a good
extent in an organization, it would definitely help in augmenting job
satisfaction of employees [76].
Mukesh Parashar, Dr, Nishith Dubey concluded in their study “A study of
HRD climate in the service industry: A critical review” that the role of tertiary
sector is increasing day by day in every country’s economy. Human resource
is playing a very significant role in service sector as they are in direct contact
with the customer. For organizational gain internal customer, that is
employees have to be motivated for which proper HRD climate is extremely
essential. The studies discussed in the research reveal that there is a significant
evidence which claims that HRD climate is better in service industries than
manufacturing industry.
The HRD climate consists of three variables (Fig. 1): General Climate, HRD
Mechanism and OCTAPAC culture and all three have to be taken due care to
generate competent employees ensuring optimization of human resource.
There is a direct relationship between HRD climate and job satisfaction and
job satisfaction is in a direct relationship with organizational performance.
Thus, organizations aspiring for performance should take care of the 3
variables affecting HRD climate [67].
[Fig. 1]
Model of HRD climate variables affecting organizational performance.
1.2 Rationale of the study
In light of industrial and economic growth in India the engineering and
management education have become first priority among the youth of our
country, as it gives faster growth in career and ample opportunity of
employment without investing much of time and money like other sector such
as Medical education, Law etc. To satisfy the demand for engineering and
management education, Indian government has now started permitting private
sectors to run the engineering and management institutions under the
regulations of Regulatory Authorities like AICTE and UGC etc..Although the
Top Management Support for Organizational Behavior Team Spirit Training to Practice
HRD Climate
General Climate HRD Mechanism OCTAPAC Culture Job
Satisfaction
Internal Customers (Employees)
Early Potential of Human Potential
Skill Enhancement Development
Organizational Performance
academic structure and employment eligibility etc. are directly under control
of these bodies still it is becoming difficult day by day to an institute to
immerge as the best engineering or management institute among the existing
and upcoming thousands of engineering and management institutes in the
country.
As the numbers of institutes are increasing, the demand for technical and
management qualified people for quality teaching is also increasing. In the last
few years, it has become extremely difficult to run engineering and
management colleges efficiently due to the competition at all levels. Though
the strength of aspiring students is increasing, because of the phenomenal
growth of engineering and management institutes, the situation is getting
worst. The last two decades had witnessed phenomenal growth in institutes
imparting engineering and management education, primarily due to private
sector participation. The private sector institutes have grown in quantity, but
they have failed in maintaining desired quality education. These private
institutions are still struggling to attract high ranking students. The issues of
academic quality, infrastructure, unable to give ‘industry ready’ students,
placements, etc. are the prime factors which need to be given priority attention
of the stakeholders.
To overcome from this problem every institute is trying best to engage
teachers and staff with it, so that they are supposed to adopt best HR practices
to provide the best organizational environment to retain their Human
Resource. They need to behave more professionally than the earlier
conservative system of the education sector. They should emphasize more on
the way employees interact with each other and the way members of the
organization conduct themselves with outsiders (Climate). Presently, more
than 3500 engineering institutes and around 2500 management institutes
(approved by AICTE; source AICTE) are imparting the engineering and
management education in our country, and they have huge demand of
technically and professionally qualified skilled human resource.
It has become necessary for them to create an organizational climate in such
way that can result a professional behavior within the employee and can help
them to retain with the organization for a long time and deliver their best
students. This research will help in identifying factors and designing suitable
strategies for a good and satisfactory HRD climate in engineering and
management institutes. Human resources are the most vital resources the
organizations and it is important to provide a congenial HRD climate for the
well-being of employees. Not much research work has been done on this topic.
It is an area of growing importance and thus research work is preferred on this
topic.
1.3 Research Methodology
The Study: The study was undertaken to compare the extent to which HRD
climate persists in a selected engineering and management institutes. The
information was collected from total 403 respondents working in 19 institutes
out of which 83 respondents were from 7 management institutes and 320
respondents were from 12 engineering institutes. These institutes are imparting
education in various fields of engineering and management, such as computer
science, information technology, electronics, mechanical, civil engineering,
and various streams of management like marketing, human resource, and
finance etc. are few among many more streams of engineering and
management education related fields . Data collected from Astral Institute of
Technology and Research (AITR), BM College of Technology (BMCT), CH
Institute of Management & Commerce (CHIMC), Chamelidevi Institute of
Management (CITM), Core Business School (CBS), Indore Institute of
Science and Technology (IIST), Jawaharlal Institute of Technology (JIT),
Malwa Institute of Technology (MITI), Medicaps Institute of Technology &
Management (MITM), Malwa Institute of Science & Technology (MIST),
Mahakal Institute of Technology (MIT), Prestige Institute of Engineering and
Science (PIES), Prestige Institute of Management and Research (PIMR),
Prestige Institute of Management Dewas (PIM), Rishiraj Institute of
Technology (RIT), Sapient Institute of Management Studies (SIMS), Shri
Vaishnav Institute of Management (SVIM), Shri Vaishnav Institute of
Technology & Science (SVITS), Vindhya Institute Of Technology (VIT),
Institute of Engineering and Technology, Gazizbad (IET). The information
was collected during, 2012 - 2013. No uniform procedure of sampling could
be followed. The questionnaires were given to all types of employees
randomly, taking into consideration of their availability and their interest to
respond the questionnaire.
Design: The study is descriptive in nature.
Sample Size: Responses collected from 430 employees of engineering and
management institutes through 1000 structured questionnaire developed by T.
V. Rao for HRD Climate survey distributed to various levels and category of
employees. Responses also collected on a web page through a web link
specially developed for this purpose only. Around 27 questionnaires were
rejected due to partially filling or answering found in a particular pattern.
Total 403 responses were taken into consideration for analysis.
Sampling Techniques: Randomization by convenience judgmental sampling.
Methodology and Data Analysis Tools: A structured questionnaire developed
by T. V. Rao (XLRI Jamshedpur) for the HRD Climate survey was used. It is
a standardized and widely used principle instrument for the HRD Climate
survey. The questionnaire consists of 38 questions which help to explore the
HRD climate persistence in any organization. It also segregates the climate in
three categories as General climate, HRD Mechanism and OCTAPAC culture
to understand the environment, policies and intra personal behavior of the
employees within the organization. The study has segregated 38 questions in
three groups of 13, 15 and 10 questions, where, first 13 question grouped to
explore the status of General climate, 14 – 26, 37 and 38 grouped to explore
the HRD mechanism and 27 – 36 grouped to explore the OCTAPAC culture
exist within the organization. The questionnaire was developed using a five
point scale for each question and the respondents were requested to assign
their rating on the scale ranging from strong agreement to strong disagreement
over the issue. Responses were given weightage of marks as 5 – almost always
true, 4 – mostly true, 3 – sometime true, 2 – rarely true, 1 – not at all true. A
score of 3 and around indicating a moderate tendency on the particular
dimension.
In order to make interpretations easy the mean score were converted into a
percentage score using the formula Percentage score = (mean score-1) x 25.
This assumes that a score of 1 represents 0 percent, of 2 represents 25 percent,
of 3 represents 50 percent, of 4 represents 75 percent, and of 5 represents 100
percent. Thus, percentage score indicates the degree to which the particular
dimension exists in the institute out of the total 100. The reliability coefficient
(Cronbach’s Alpha) recalculated and found 0.87 in General Climate, 0.80 in
HRD Mechanism and 0.84 in OCTAPAC culture.
Various statistical tools like Mean Deviation, Standard Deviation, Correlation,
Z-test and Factor Analysis have been used for the analysis of data. The z- test
is based on the assumption of normality i.e. The source of data is considered to
be normally distributed. In some cases the population may not be normally
distributed, yet the test will be applicable on account of the fact that we mostly
deal with sample and sampling distribution closely approach the normal
distribution.
Z-test based on the normal probability distribution and for judging the
significance of several statistical measures, particularly the Mean. The The
relevant test statistics, z, is worked out and compared with its probable value
(to be read from a table showing the area under normal curve) at a specific
level of significance for judging the significance of the measure concerned.
This is a most frequently used test in a research study. This test is used even
when binomial distribution or t-distribution is applicable on the presumption
that such a distribution tend to approximate a normal distribution as ‘n’
becomes larger.
Z-test is generally used for comparing the mean of a sample to some
hypothesized mean for the population in case of a large sample, or when the
population variance is known. Z- test is also used for comparing the sample
proportion to a theoretical value of the population or for judging the difference
in the proportion of two independent sample when ‘n’ happen to be large.
Besides, this test is used for judging the significance of median, mode,
coefficient of correlation and several other measured.
Few examples of various studies conducted to know the status of HRD climate
and perception of various categories of employees about the HRD climate as
persist in engineering and management Institute, University and Industry are
given in a table below to justify the use of instruments (questionnaires),
statistical tools and techniques in the study. Most of the studies, particularly on
HRD climate are included in the literature review have used the same
instruments and statistical tools for analysis of responses.
Sr.
No
.
Author Study Year
Instrument
(Used for
response)
Statistica
l Tools Result
1. Smruti
Patre,
Rashmi
Gupta
A study on the
perception of
Management
institute faculty
towards HRD
culture with
reference to
Nagpur city.
2011 HRD climate
questionnaire
developed by
the center for
HRD at XLRI
was used as the
basis with a few
modifications
Mean,
Standard
Deviation,
Chi-
Square
Test and
Regressio
n analysis
The study
shows that
the HRD
climate in
the
manageme
nt institutes
is average.
2. P. Dubey,
S. K.
Sharma
HRD Climate
Survey in
Private
Engineering
colleges of
Odisha
2012 HRD Climate
survey
questionnaire
developed by
Prof. T. V. Rao
was used as the
principle
instrument for
data collection
(with some
modifications).
This is because
it is a
standardized and
widely used
principle
instrument for
the HRD
Climate survey.
Percentage
, Mean
and
Standard
Deviation
and one
way
ANOVA
The mean
score of
3.599
indicates
the HRD
Climate in
Private
engineering
colleges in
Odisha is
average
and still
needs to be
upgraded
3. Dr. Parvez
Abdulla
Gaurav
Sehgal
Asif A.
Khan
A Pragmatic
Exploration of
HRD Climate
Practices In
State and
Central
Universities
2012 An instrument
developed by
Rao (1989)
comprising of
38 statements is
used.
Statements are
categorized as
General
Climate,
OCTAPACE
Culture and
HRD
Mechanism.
These thirty
eight statements
are categorized
as General
Climate,
OCTAPACE
Culture and
HRD
Mechanism.
Mean,
Standard
Deviation,
Percentage
Z-Test
The HRD
climate in
state
universities
is at an
average
and in
Central
Universitie
s is better
as
compared
to state
universities
1.4 Objective of the study
1. To identifying factor affecting HRD climate in Management and
Engineering colleges.
2. To identify whether there exists a significant difference in perception
of employees about prevailing HRD climate in Management colleges.
3. To identify whether there exists a significant difference in perception
of employees about prevailing HRD climate in engineering colleges.
Sr.
No
.
Author Study Year
Instrument
(Used for
response)
Statistic
al Tools Result
4. S.A.
Mufeed
F.A.
Gurkoo
Enhancing
Educational
Institutions
Effectiveness
Through
HRD
Climate: An
Empirical
Assessment.
2006
The
questionnaire,
as devised by
the Xavier
Labor
Relations
Institute,
Jamshedpur
was picked.
The section
included 38
statements for
assessing HRD
climate at the
university.
Percentag
e, Mean
and
Standard
Deviation
and one
way
ANOVA
Employees in
general
perceived that
the HRD
climate at the
University was
'poor'.
5. Dr. S.
Saraswathi
Human
Resources
Development
Climate: An
Empirical
Study
2010
Recognizing
the importance
of HRD
climate, Center
for HRD,
Xavier Labor
Relations
Institute
(XLRI)
developed 38-
item HRD
climate
questionnaire
to survey the
extent to which
development
climate exists
in
organizations
Mean,
Standard
Deviation,
Percentag
e
Z-Test
The general
climate, HRD
Mechanism
and OCTAPAC
culture is better
in software
organizations
compared to
manufacturing.
From the
comparative
analysis, it is
concluded that
there is a
significant
difference in
the HRD
climate of
software and
manufacturing
organizations.
4. Comparative Study of HRD climate in Management and Engineering
College.
1.5 Hypotheses
1. There is no significant difference in the HRD climate of management
colleges as perceived by teaching and non-teaching employees.
2. There is no significant difference in the HRD climate of management
colleges as perceived by employees in senior-level management and
employees in junior - level management.
3. There is no significant difference in perception of the HRD climate
amongst employees in different age groups of management colleges.
4. There is no significant difference in perception of the HRD climate by
male and female employees of management colleges.
5. There is no significant difference in perception of the HRD climate as
perceived by employees with more experience with the organization
and those with less experience with the organization of Management
collages.
6. There is no significant difference in HRD climate of engineering
colleges as perceived by teaching and non-teaching employees.
7. There is no significant difference in HRD climate of engineering
colleges as perceived by employees in senior-level management and
employees in junior - level management.
8. There is no significant difference in perception of HRD climate
amongst employees in different age groups of engineering colleges.
9. There is no significant difference in perception of HRD climate by
male and female employees of engineering colleges.
10. There is no significant difference in perception of HRD climate as
perceived by employees of engineering colleges with more experience
with the organization and those with less experience with the
organization.
11. There is no significant difference in HRD climate as perceived of
management and engineering colleges.