Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lester-skinner |
View: | 229 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Chapter 6
Data-Driven Fraud Detection
Sampling
ISA 240 emphasizes that Fraud is more difficult to detect than unintentional errors
• Errors - sampling is typically effective• Fraud - questionable
ISA: Responsibility
ISA 240: An auditor conducting an audit in accordance with ISAs is responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
Scope Paragraph - Standard Report
We conducted our audit in accordance with GAAS. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
2nd and 3rd standards of field work
The auditor must obtain a sufficient understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control, to assess the risk of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to error or fraud, to design the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures. The auditor must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence by performing audit procedures to afford a reasonable basis for an opinion regarding the financial statements under audit.
ISA 240: Objectives
• To identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of financial statements due to fraud;
• To obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the assessed risks of material misstatements due to fraud through designing and implementing appropriate responses; and
• To respond appropriately to fraud or suspected fraud identified during the audit.
Chapter 6: the data analysis process
• Understand the business• Identify possible frauds that could occur• Catalog possible fraud symptoms• Use technology to gather data• Analyze results• Investigate symptoms
the data analysis process
ISA 240 Objectives Stds of Field Work Data analysis process
assess RoMM 2nd Assess Romm 1- Understand Bus 2- ID possible frauds 3- Catalog fraud symptoms 2nd Design tests Sufficient evidence 3rd Suff evidence 4- Use Tech to gather data 5- Analyze results Repond Appropriately 6- Investigate symptoms I’m not sure this is a response
the data analysis process
Understand the business– Tour the business– Become familiar with competitors– Interview key personnel– Analyze financial statements
• Analyze other accounting information– Review documentation regarding processes
• Accounting • Information
– Observe employees performing their duties• Walkthrough
the data analysis process
• Catalog possible fraud symptoms ----- How will you recognize it if you see it
– Accounting anomalies– Internal control weaknesses– Analytical anomalies– Extravagant lifestyles– Unusual behavior– Tips and complaints
the data analysis process
Identify possible frauds that could occurAU 314.40 “Identify types of potential misstatements”
the data analysis process
• Use technology to gather data IDEA or ACL
• Analyze results• Investigate symptoms
Kickbacks Redflags page 171 Figure 6.2
Increasing pricesLarger order quantitiesIncreasing purchases from favored vendorDecreasing quality Unusual Behavior - we won’t likely see as external auditors Extravagant Lifestyle - we won’t likely see as external auditors All transactions from one buyerUse of unapproved vendors Anonymous complaints about buyerComplaints from unsuccessful vendorsQuality complaints from customers
IDEA section 3 -- kickbacksPayments to unauthorized suppliers ---
matching payments to list of authorized suppliersextract payments to payees not on list of authorized suppliers
Payments to individuals ---- searching for payees without Inc., Co., or Ltd. in their name
Test for duplicate invoices duplicate amount and supplier codeDuplicate amount and Purchase order number
Identify payments made on SundayPayments just below amount requiring approval (it seems to $80,000)Split invoicesVendors for whom payments have increased more than 25%Match supplier names with employee names
IDEA section3 - tomorrow
3.8 Stratify payments a lot $75,000 - $80,0003.9 Extract all payments between 75 -80,000
Extract all payments over $100,000
IDEA section 3 - tomorrow
3.10 Extract payments round numbers $xx,000Extract all payments authorized by HMVlots of $75-$80 payments were HMV’sExtract all Sunday paymentsExtract all payments with “CASH” in nameCould search for other common names,
addresses, PO boxes, phone nosBenford’s Law
IDEA section 3 - tomorrow
3.12 Duplicate Payments (Duplicate Key)same Amount and Supplier number extract all Supplier Numbers with > one Payee
3.13 Search for unrecorded checks(GAP Detection)3.15 Extract suppliers paid in less than 25 days
- policy to pay between 25-35 days
IDEA section 3 - tomorrow
3.16 Join Accounts Payable and Authorized Supplier Two Payees with the same Supplier NumberDuplicate KeyExtract payments to vendors not on Authorized Supplier
3.17 Summarize and Extract vendors for which payments increased more than 25%
IDEA section 3 - tomorrow
20 payments with CASH in vendor name 5 payments of $75,000 3 of which were potential duplicate payments 399 payments authorized by HMV 49 payments on Sunday – most authorized by HMV 5 missing checks 63 payments made in less than 25 days 6 of which were paid before the invoice was entered in the system 8 payments to unauthorized vendors 7 of which had CASH in their name All authorized by either HMV (5) or VST (3) 2 vendors have the same Supplier No.
Analysis
• Bedford’s Law
• Normal Distribution± 1.00 .6828 ± 1.28 .80
± 2.00 .9544 ± 1.645 .90
± 3.00 .9973 ± 1.96 .95
± 2.57 .99
Trend Analysis
Over time you seequantity purchased from vendor increasingprice per unit from vendor increasing
Match or Fuzzy Match
Employee names -- vendor namesCustomer names – vendor namesAddresses, PO Box, phone numbers
Why might you see
One vendor is always the last to submit a bid
The procurement specifications include a large number of specifications that do not seem necessary
Analyze Financial Statements
“change statements”Change current year from prior yearRatiosVertical analysis
% of Sales on Inc State----% of Total Assets on BS
Horizontal analysis% change from prior years
Statement of Cash Flows
Liquidity current ratioQuick ratio Acid Test ratio
Performance Accounts Receivable Turnover / Days in ReceivablInventory Turnover / Days in Inventory
Solvency Debt to EquityDebt PercentageTimes Interest Earned
Profitability Profit MarginReturn on Equity / Return on Assets / Return on ?Earnings per Share