Date post: | 17-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | curtis-strickland |
View: | 238 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Chapter 7Critical Approaches to Research: Action and Feminist Research
Winston Jackson and Norine Verberg
Methods: Doing Social Research, 4e
7-2 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Critical Research
Social change orientation of critical schools See inequality as rooted in exploitative social
relations Advocate greater equality Advocate sociopolitical and structural change
Examples of critical schools Marxism Feminism Action research
7-3 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Core “Methodologic Themes” Common to All Critical Approaches
1. Research topic concerns disadvantaged, oppressed, marginalized group
2. Research process/results have the potential to benefit the marginalized group
3. Researcher’s assumptions are made explicit and examined
4. Prior scholarship is critiqued to expose bias
5. Researchers and participants interact as collaborators (Berman, Ford-Gilboe & Campbell)
7-4 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
The Premise of Critical Research – Knowledge Is a Political ProcessWe live in a world in which knowledge is used to
maintain oppressive relations. Information is interpreted and organized in such a way that the views of a small group of people are presented as objective knowledge, as “The Truth.” We believe that Maria Meis was right when she said that “Research, which so far has been largely the instrument of dominance and legitimation of power elites, must be brought to serve the interests of dominated, exploited, and oppressed groups.” (Kirby and McKenna)
7-5 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Research by, for, and with Participants
Advocate “research from the margins” “Research from the margins is not research on
people from the margins, but research by, for, and with them.”
Identifies social change as a specific goal or outcome of research (Kirby and McKenna)
7-6 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Which Research Method or Research Design Should Be Used? Considerable debate and disagreement Many critical researchers reject positivist
assumptions (i.e., objective and value free) Hence, some reject quantitative methods
Others agree with the critique of positivism but believe quantitative research designs are useful for exposing social inequality
Critical researchers employ quantitative or qualitative methods, or both
7-7 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Which Research Method or Research Design? (cont’d)
Many emphasize “methodological triangulation” – i.e., use several methods “Stories and numbers” – qualitative + quantitative
E.g., Browne used a quasi-experimental design to measure impact of interventions on parents and children living on social assistance and a cost analysis of providing the assistance In addition to showing that the interventions had a
positive impact, showed them to be cost effective Argue that “numbers” can impact policy reform
7-8 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Institutional Ethnography
A relatively new critical method Developed by Dorothy Smith Explores how everyday life is organized Focuses on the way structural conditions
influence consciousness e.g., examine how texts shape and reproduce
social relations (texts refer to the organizational features of institutions: school policy, workplace regulations, government policy, etc.)
Adopted by many feminists
7-9 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Action Research
Action research proceeds in cyclical stages that involve planning, implementing, reflecting, and evaluating, and it involves collaboration between researchers and participants throughout the entire process
Action research: Is educative Deals with individuals as members of social groups Is problem-focused, context-specific, and future-
oriented Involves a change intervention (cont’d)
7-10 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Action Research (cont’d)
Action research: Aims at improvement and involvement Involves a cyclic process in which research,
action, and evaluation are interlinked Is founded on a research relationship in which
those involved are participants in the change process
Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a subset of action research. Has three elements: research, adult education,
and sociopolitical action
7-11 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Steps in Action Research
Entry into the community Assessment of the situation Planning for research and action Implementation of plan and reflection Evaluation of the implementation Report and reassessment Planning future action
7-12 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Challenges in Conducting Action Research
Involving community members as members of the research team
Understanding and respecting diversity of values, perspectives, and abilities among community members and researchers
Ensuring that all members of the research team are sensitive and responsive to the needs of different forms and types of leadership at different stages of the research process
Action research takes a great deal of time
7-13 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Strengths of Action Research
Offers opportunities for researchers to plan, implement, and evaluate change simultaneously
Empowers participants Researchers gain practical knowledge;
participants gain research skills, political knowledge, and a sense of empowerment
7-14 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Example: Kim Travers
Conducted participatory action research Goal: to initiate nutrition education as well as
to explain the social organization that permitted nutritional inequalities among socially disadvantaged women and their families Involved women attending a Parent Centre Explored women’s experiences shopping for food
Women initiated actions to address nutritional inequalities
7-15 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Feminist Research
Feminists share many views but differ on key issues: hence, may say there are feminisms
Shared assumptions and orientations: Value women and their experiences, ideas, and
needs See phenomena from the perspective of women Recognize the existence of conditions that oppress
women Desire to change conditions through research leading
to political action
7-16 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Feminist Research
Uses a variety of quantitative and qualitative methods, but more emphasis on qualitative methods including in-depth interviews, oral histories, comparative and field studies
Emphasis on subjectivity and the personal experiences of the participants
Data are analyzed within the context of women’s lives in such a way that women are empowered rather than portrayed in ways that stereotype them
7-17 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Feminist Values
Women’s subjective experiences The context in women’s lives Relationship between researcher and
participant Inclusion of diverse women
7-18 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Feminist Research Questions
Issues that are of primary concern to women Encourage women to report their experiences in
their own voices Allow for a structural analysis of the conditions
of women’s lives with a goal of improving the conditions E.g., accessing health care, women’s work,
women’s health, poverty, motherhood
7-19 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Role of the Researcher
Non-hierarchical, reciprocal relationship Views self as a partner with participants
Vulnerable one, shares experiences and emotions with participants as team member
Reflexivity is expected of the researcher
7-20 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Types of Data Collection
Oral history interviewing Multiple in-depth interviews Participant observation Focus group interviews Structured/semi-structured interview guides Documents such as diaries, letters, photos Questionnaires and indexes
7-21 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Approaches to Data Analysis
Content is analyzed in terms of artifacts produced by women, about women, for women
Patriarchy and ethnocentric bias are major themes examined in the analysis
Participants are active partners in the data analysis process
7-22 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reporting Findings
Use descriptive, non-sexist language Portray women’s voices Provide a structural analysis of the everyday
lives of women Avoid academic jargon; make findings
accessible to all women, not just academics Include an analysis of the role of the
researcher
7-23 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Feminist Activism and Research in Atlantic Coastal Communities
Linda Christiansen-Ruffman conducted feminist-based participatory action research with women living in coastal communities during the closure of the cod fishery
Notes that women had been excluded from the decision-making process
Many women did not qualify for the compensation package because their work was not recognized
7-24 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Feminist Activism and Research in Atlantic Coastal Communities (cont’d) Women in coastal communities established
Nova Scotia Women’s FishNet Women saw the need to become organized
and engage in planning by, for, and with the local communities
Rejected the official response Produced fact sheets and an action plan for
women in coastal communities Response reflected their more holistic
understanding of coastal communities
7-25 © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Advantages and Limitations
Advantages Provides opportunity to make research
methods available to communities In the case of feminism, it redresses a gender
bias in past research Limitations
Many challenges to working with community groups: time consuming, need for reflection on process, roles, values, etc.