+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Chapter(12((mfscott/labs/Chapter_12-13.pdf · Mean (mm) Variance (mm2) Sample size, n Corn diet...

Chapter(12((mfscott/labs/Chapter_12-13.pdf · Mean (mm) Variance (mm2) Sample size, n Corn diet...

Date post: 09-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
4
Chapter 12 18. The males of stalkeyed flies (Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni) have long eye stalks. The females sometimes use the length of these eye stalks to choose mates. (See Example 11.2 for a similar story in a related species.) Is the male’s eyestalk length affected by the quality of its diet? An experiment was carried out in which two groups of male “stalkies” were reared on different foods (David et al. 2000). One group was fed corn (considered a high quality food), while the other was fed cotton wool (a food of substantially lower quality). Each male was raised singly and so represents an independent sampling unit. The eye spans (the distance between the eyes) were recorded in millimeters. The raw data, which are plotted as histograms below, are as follows: Corn diet: 2.15, 2.14, 2.13, 2.13, 2.12, 2.11, 2.1, 2.08, 2.08, 2.08, 2.04, 2.05, 2.03, 2.02, 2.01, 2, 1.99, 1.96, 1.95, 1.93, 1.89. Cotton diet: 2.12, 2.07, 2.01, 1.93, 1.77, 1.68, 1.64, 1.61, 1.59, 1.58, 1.56, 1.55, 1.54, 1.49, 1.45, 1.43, 1.39, 1.34, 1.33, 1.29, 1.26, 1.24, 1.11, 1.05. These data can be summarized as follows, where the cornfed flies represent treatment group 1 and the cottonfed flies represent treatment group 2.
Transcript
Page 1: Chapter(12((mfscott/labs/Chapter_12-13.pdf · Mean (mm) Variance (mm2) Sample size, n Corn diet (group 1) 2.047 0.00558 21 Cotton diet (group 2) 1.543 0.08119 24 $ a.$What$is$the$best$test$to$use$to$compare$the

Chapter  12    

18.  The  males  of  stalk-­‐eyed  flies  (Cyrtodiopsis  dalmanni)  have  long  eye  stalks.  The  females  sometimes  use  the  length  of  these  eye  stalks  to  choose  mates.  (See  Example  11.2  for  a  similar  story  in  a  related  species.)  Is  the  male’s  eyestalk  length  affected  by  the  quality  of  its  diet?  An  experiment  was  carried  out  in  which  two  groups  of  male  “stalkies”  were  reared  on  different  foods  (David  et  al.  2000).  One  group  was  fed  corn  (considered  a  high  quality  food),  while  the  other  was  fed  cotton  wool  (a  food  of  substantially  lower  quality).  Each  male  was  raised  singly  and  so  represents  an  independent  sampling  unit.  The  eye  spans  (the  distance  between  the  eyes)  were  recorded  in  millimeters.  The  raw  data,  which  are  plotted  as  histograms  below,  are  as  follows:    Corn  diet:  2.15,  2.14,  2.13,  2.13,  2.12,  2.11,  2.1,  2.08,  2.08,  2.08,  2.04,  2.05,  2.03,  2.02,  2.01,  2,  1.99,  1.96,  1.95,  1.93,  1.89.    Cotton  diet:  2.12,  2.07,  2.01,  1.93,  1.77,  1.68,  1.64,  1.61,  1.59,  1.58,  1.56,  1.55,  1.54,  1.49,  1.45,  1.43,  1.39,  1.34,  1.33,  1.29,  1.26,  1.24,  1.11,  1.05.    These  data  can  be  summarized  as  follows,  where  the  corn-­‐fed  flies  represent  treatment  group  1  and  the  cotton-­‐fed  flies  represent  treatment  group  2.    

 

Page 2: Chapter(12((mfscott/labs/Chapter_12-13.pdf · Mean (mm) Variance (mm2) Sample size, n Corn diet (group 1) 2.047 0.00558 21 Cotton diet (group 2) 1.543 0.08119 24 $ a.$What$is$the$best$test$to$use$to$compare$the

  Mean

(mm) Variance

(mm2)

Sample size, n Corn diet (group 1) 2.047 0.00558 21

Cotton diet (group 2) 1.543 0.08119 24  a.  What  is  the  best  test  to  use  to  compare  the  means  of  the  two  groups?  Why?  b.  Carry  out  the  test  identified  in  part  (a),  using  α  =  0.01.      24.  Weddell  seals  live  in  the  Antarctic  and  feed  on  fish  during  long  deep  dives  in  freezing  water.  The  seals  benefit  from  these  feeding  dives,  but  the  food  they  gain  comes  at  a  metabolic  cost.  The  dives  are  strenuous.  A  set  of  researchers  wanted  to  know  whether  feeding  per  se  was  also  energetically  expensive,  over  and  above  the  exertion  of  a  regular  dive  (Williams  et  al.  2004).  They  determined  the  metabolic  cost  of  dives  by  measuring  the  oxygen  use  of  seals  as  they  surfaced  for  air  after  a  dive.  They  measured  the  metabolic  cost  of  10  feeding  dives  and  for  each  of  these  also  measured  a  non-­‐feeding  dive  by  the  same  animal  that  lasted  the  same  amount  of  time.  The  data,  in  (ml  O2  kg-­‐1),  are  as  follows:    

 Individual  

Oxygen  consumption  after  feeding  dive  

Oxygen  consumption  after  non-­‐feeding  dive  

1     42.2   71.0  2     51.7   77.3  3     59.8   82.6  4     66.5   96.1  5     81.9   106.6  6     82.0   112.8  7     81.3   121.2  8     81.3   126.4  9     96.0   127.5  10     104.1   143.1  

 a.  Estimate  the  mean  change  in  oxygen  consumption  in  feeding  dives  compared  with  non-­‐feeding  dives.    

b.  What  is  the  99%  confidence  interval  for  the  mean  change  calculated  in  part  (a)?  c.  Test  the  hypothesis  that  feeding  does  not  change  the  metabolic  costs  of  a  dive.    

 

Page 3: Chapter(12((mfscott/labs/Chapter_12-13.pdf · Mean (mm) Variance (mm2) Sample size, n Corn diet (group 1) 2.047 0.00558 21 Cotton diet (group 2) 1.543 0.08119 24 $ a.$What$is$the$best$test$to$use$to$compare$the

 

Chapter  13  

28.  The  pseudoscorpion  Cordylochernes  scorpioides  lives  in  tropical  forests,  where  it  ride  on  the  backs  of  harlequin  beetles  to  reach  the  decaying  fig  trees  in  which  they  live.  Females  of  the  species  mate  with  multiple  males  over  their  short  lifetimes,  which  is  puzzling  because  mating  just  once  provides  all  the  sperm  she  needs  to  fertilize  her  eggs.  A  possible  advantage  is  that  by  mating  multiple  times  a  female  increases  the  chances  of  mating  with  at  least  one  sperm-­‐compatible  male,  if  incompatibilities  are  present  in  the  population.  To  investigate,  Newcomer  et  al.  (1999)  recorded  the  number  of  successful  broods  by  female  pseudoscorpions  randomly  assigned  to  one  of  two  treatments.  Females  were  each  mated  to  two  different  males  (DM  treatment),  or  they  were  each  mated  twice  to  the  same  male  (SM).  This  design  provided  the  same  total  amount  of  sperm  to  females  in  both  treatments,  but  DM  females  received  genetically  more  diverse  sperm  than  SM  females.  The  number  of  successful  broods  of  offspring  for  each  female  is  listed  below.  The  data  were  not  normally  distributed  and  to  test  the  null  hypothesis  of  no  difference  between  treatments  in  the  mean  number  of  broods  we  carried  out  a  permutation  test  in  which  the  data  were  randomly  reshuffled  10,000  times  on  the  computer.  Our  test  statistic  was  the  difference  between  groups  in  the  mean  number  of  broods  (SM  minus  DM).  The  observed  value  of  this  difference  was  -­‐0.841.  The  null  distribution  from  the  10,000  permutations  is  shown  in  the  upper  panel  of  the  accompanying  figure.  The  far  left  tail  of  the  null  distribution  is  shown  in  the  lower  panel.  Numbers  below  each  bar  give  the  exact  values  of  the  test  statistic;  numbers  above  give  the  frequency  of  each  of  the  values  in  10,000  permutations.  Using  these  values,  carry  out  the  permutation  test.1    SM  treatment:  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  2,  2,  2,  

2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  5,  5,  5,  5,  5,  6,  6,  6  

DM  treatment:  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  2,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  3,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  4,  5,  5,  5,  5,  5,  5,  5,  5,  6,  6,  6,  6,  6,  6,  7,  7  

 

                                                                                                               1  The data are also available at www.zoology.ubc.ca/~whitlock/ABD  

Page 4: Chapter(12((mfscott/labs/Chapter_12-13.pdf · Mean (mm) Variance (mm2) Sample size, n Corn diet (group 1) 2.047 0.00558 21 Cotton diet (group 2) 1.543 0.08119 24 $ a.$What$is$the$best$test$to$use$to$compare$the

       


Recommended